free counter with statistics Fearless | Pajiba - Scathing Reviews for Bitchy People

fearless.jpg
I H♥te Martial Arts Films

Fearless / Dustin Rowles

Film Reviews | September 21, 2006 | Comments (29)


I’m not going to lie to you people: I don’t care for martial-arts films. There’s just nothing there for me. Unless there’s a stitched pigskin involved, I have no desire to see a bunch of men kick the shit out of each other in the name of honor. In fact, in the two-plus years that Pajiba has existed, I’ve never once reviewed a martial-arts flick. Hell, the last one I saw was probably Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon, and even that one didn’t do much for me — men kicking the shit out of each other on a high wire is no more appealing than watching them do the same in mid-air, on a ladder, under a table, in a box, with a fox, etc.

Indeed, assignments here generally have some correlation with the critic’s interest, which is why Jeremy usually winds up reviewing the martial arts films, while I get the lion’s share of sports flicks and shitty romantic comedies. But it’s nice to shake things up once in a while, to occasionally bring a new perspective to an unfamiliar genre, which is why — for instance — that Phillip got stuck with the Gridiron Gang last week (though he detests football) instead of yet another B-level horror flick. If you’re a hard-core martial-arts enthusiast or a huge fan of Jet Li, however, I suspect you’re probably going to see Fearless anyway. But if you don’t want to read a bunch of ignorant, self-indulgent, blasphemous hackery about a genre you adore, then I suggest you move right along to Jeremy’s respectful review of Hero, because I refuse to be wowed by a grown man who can stick his fist through a plank, even if it took him two decades to learn what would otherwise be a moderately impressive party trick.

So, Fearless (or Huo Yuan Jia, if you will) is about Huo Yuan Jia (Jet Li), who was a big deal back in the day, a spiritual guru in China and founder of the Jin Wu Sports Federation (and if that doesn’t put you to sleep right there, your interest level has already risen three levels higher than mine ever did). The film opens in Shanghai, in 1910, where Huo is engaged in some sort of tournament in which he faces off against an English boxer and some other fellas who brandish sharp weapons and whip them around really, really fast. And I’ll concede this: it’s pretty fucking impressive that no one gets an eye poked out. After he defeats the lot, Huo readies himself to face his top challenger, at which point the film flashes back 30 years, giving us the blessed opportunity to track Huo’s life from childhood.

As a tyke, Huo’s father was an instructor of a martial arts school, though he was apparently not skilled enough to win a fight by holding his palm two inches from a foe’s forehead and attempting some sort of Vulcan mind meld. That defeat, naturally, is humiliating to Huo, so he challenges a bully kid who is taunting him about his Pa. And, after the bigger kid beats the holy living crap out of him, Huo resolves never to lose another fight again, using revenge as his sole motive; and if we know anything from Confucius, it’s that revenge is not cool.

Twenty-five years later, Huo meets the bully again and does, indeed, thrash the living tar out of him, though I must say he takes a lot of cheap shots at the groin (clearly, Ultimate Fighting Championship rules were not in effect in turn-of-the-century China). Of course, winning that match is not redemptive enough for Master Huo. He wants to be number one, bitches, and all the maxims his elders toss at him about how winning isn’t everything don’t assuage his blood thirst. Indeed, the more fights he wins, the more cocksure he gets. He even develops a group of hangers-on that would make Vincent Chase jealous — though all they seem to care about is his ability to pick up the bar tab — and his head swells accordingly (and you might be surprised to know that emo haircuts were all the rage during that time).

Eventually, Master Huo does challenge and defeat the number-one fighter, though the guy has to resort to breaking a lot of nice vases to do so (pity). What he doesn’t really mean to do, however, is deliver the death blow, and doing so sends Master Huo on one helluva bender. So, he pretty much does what anyone would do after killing a man and discovering just how lonely it is at the top: He gets the hell out of Dodge (or Tienstsin, whatever) and becomes a back-to-the-lander! Yep. He grows a beard, finds a nice young pixie-girl who’ll comb his hair for him, and discovers what really matters in life: horseflies and soup!

But, after years of loving the land — like any self-respecting hippie — he returns to civilization. When he gets back, however, he discovers that the debt collectors have repossessed most of his shit but, on the plus side, he now understands why he needn’t ever deliver the death blow. He does return to the ring, though, only now he’s not such a fucking showoff and stops fighting his challengers one-handed, with the other holding an umbrella. He’s all about the compassion, folks. And now that’s he’s stopped knocking back the red wine, he gets deep into the Roadhouse mentality: 1) Never underestimate anyone or any situation; 2) take it outside; and, most importantly, 3) be nice.

The conclusion of Fearless, of course, is all about virtue, reminding us of the importance of honor and patriotism, using the requisite dissolves and close-ups we’ve come to expect from bad American films. Somehow, in fact, I suspect that if this weren’t an Asian martial arts film that no one would accord it with the kind of respect it will inevitably receive, despite all of its over-the-top Roland Emmerich flourishes — and really, why should we expect better from Ronny Yu, the director of Freddy vs. Jason and Bride of Chucky. I’d also add that, for those of you who do love this sort of thing for the brilliant, kinetic fight sequences, the ones that do exist are pretty stellar. Unfortunately, for all the technical achievements and the bone-crunching brawls in the beginning and end, the movie drags for around an hour while Huo “finds himself,” and all hostilities come to a woeful standstill in favor of a pap morality tale that all the so-called charm of Jet Li’s stoicism can’t enliven.

I’ll also reiterate for the record that my opinions of the martial arts genre are not necessarily reflective of the rest of Pajiba. [It must say something about them that Jeremy — who is probably our most cerebral critic (he wrote over 6,000 words on the first half of his De Palma piece, for God’s sake) — absolutely adores a good martial arts film]. But as with Citizen Kane or Battleship Potemkin, I can certainly appreciate the contributions of martial arts films to cinema without actually enjoying them, and I’ll grant their undeniable influence on films I actually do like. But kung-fu, tae-kwon-do, jujitsu, Kieichu Do, Mau rakau or whatever — it’s all just karate to me, man. And the second that Ralph Macchio hobbled off that mat and collected his trophy, my brief fling with it ended, which is why I imagine I’ll go back to reviewing shitty romantic comedies next week.

Dustin Rowles is the publisher of Pajiba. He lives in Ithaca, NY. You may email him, or leave a comment below.


Gridiron Gang | Flyboys



Comments

Funny, I was listening to Wu-tang as I came to this review. I dunno, I'm probably the only one who finds that even mildly chuckle-worthy...

Posted by: Matt at September 21, 2006 6:19 PM

the way you describe the action in the movie sounds like unleashed...it kicks ass in the very beginning and the end, but in the middle it's enough to put you to sleep. watching jet li kick ass is still watching jet li kick ass though, so i'll probably rent this when it comes out.

Posted by: razh at September 21, 2006 6:23 PM

I didn't see the appeal of Crouching Tiger Hidden Dragon either. I didn't behave very well at the theater. I think that I shouted at the screen in disgust more than once. For me it was the fighting in the trees. But I was feeling pretty concrete that day.

Posted by: anikitty at September 21, 2006 6:23 PM

While I don't agree, I can certainly see why someone would not like martial arts films. If you don't like martial arts, or the genre's conceits (gravity-defying kung fu, melodrama ((sometimes)), strangely stoic or goofy characters) then it ain't for you. I love the great ones, like the good ones, and even tolerate the terrible ones to some extent (yeah, I'm lookin' at you, Romeo Must Die).

But, before dismissing the genre outright, try Lady Snowblood. For those who don't know, Tarantino basically pirated 90% of this film to make Kill Bill. While I loved Kill Bill, as usual, the original is better than the sample. If the asskickery isn't your thing, it's really more of a meditation on the nature and impact of revenge. There's a lot of interesting historical detail, beautiful cinematography, and very good acting for a genre not known for its thespians.

Of course I'm seeing Fearless, but probably as a rental.

Posted by: MaiGirl at September 21, 2006 8:06 PM

I never understood why crouching tiger hidden dragon isn't as beloved by others as it is by me, then I spoke with my chinese friend Tian and she told me that everyone in China hates Ziyi Zhang because she apparently is "loose," and slept her way to the top. That said, I still don't think that explains it. Personally, I love the artistry and the images that are created by most good martial arts films and even a few bad ones. For me it's not so much about the storyline as it is about viewing the physical dance between people. I loved Hero, the color imagery and even the melodrama. And seriously, is there anything more romantic in film than when Chow Yun-Fat says "I would rather be a ghost drifting by your side as a condemned soul than enter heaven without you... because of your love, I will never be a lonely spirit" ? I know it's melodramatic, but the muted relationship between those two characters seemed so real, their pain was expressed beautifully onscreen.

But, to get back to the movie at hand, I have to wonder whether or not there is a level of quality that defies genre. I am a fan of pretty much every genre there is in film, so I'm probably biased on this subject. For example, although I know that Tarantino stole pretty much every shot in Kill Bill and Kill Bill 2, I still loved those movies for what they were honoring. But is there a yardstick by which we can measure Jet Li movies? Is Hero better than Fearless as a martial arts movie or just as a movie in general? I'd have to see Fearless to answer this specific question, but in general, I'd like to know what others think.

Posted by: rachael at September 21, 2006 9:04 PM

Ummm...isn't it a Vulcan Mind Meld? I almost feel exposed and vulnerable for daring to point this out.

Anyway, like any movie about football (that does not have Adam Sandler in it), I will be seeing Fearless, most likely on rental, because I don't like our crappy theater here is this hellhole of a town. Netflix, I cometh!!

Posted by: ScarletKnight at September 21, 2006 9:09 PM

Hey ScarletKnight, I think I could be your next door neighbor.

Posted by: Matt 2.0 at September 21, 2006 9:20 PM

ScarletKnight: You're right, and it's now corrected. Good Lord, but I was a nerdy child.

Posted by: Daniel at September 22, 2006 1:57 AM

Well, I'll admit it - I love me some Jet Li. He has made some godawful American movies (right there with you, MaiGirl), but when he does the Chinese stuff, he is truly amazing. And yes, his acting ranges from stoic, to enraged, to beaten puppy, but the man is a true artist when it comes to martial arts. It's like a more talented Jackie Chan, without the pratfalls. So I'll see this.

anikitty, people like you are why I don't see movies in the theaters anymore. Jerk.

Posted by: TK at September 22, 2006 9:03 AM

TK--I've done that twice in my life. The other time was "Frailty". So I can still sleep safely at night.

Posted by: anikitty at September 22, 2006 11:26 AM

I can appreciate martial arts movies as spectacle, but the whole flying ninjas thing is an aspect of the genre I find hard to endure. As much as I've ever exercised, I've never levitated.

I saw Unleashed recently and spent most of my time wondering why Morgan Freeman was in a buddy movie with Jet Li. (Hey, HBO was free and I have insomnia.) Jet Li is so wooden he can probably put his fist through himself.

Posted by: Bill at September 22, 2006 12:56 PM

Martial arts movies have come a long way since the "Kung Fu Theatre Ha-YAAAAAAH!!!" movies I watched when I was a kid, but the surrealism of them is part of what makes them so great. Plot? Bah. Plot is just an excuse to have awesome fight scenes, like the one in some old movie I never knew the name of where the old bearded guy kills the bad guy in the end by very artfully spitting a toothpick at him. Then he and his 2 young grasshoppers laugh heartily and walk off through the forest. I actually liked the plot in Crouching Tiger but again, for me it took a back seat to the fantastical fight scenes. That's what makes the genre so great--the escapism and unreality of it, plus the extreme acrobatism of the actors (hey, it ain't ALL done with wires!!!) So if I can get anyone to see this with me (sadly I'm one of very few I know who appreciate a good martial arts movie) I'll be seeing it in the theater and probably looooving it. Jet Li is enough of a reason for me to plunk down $10.
P.S. No Matt, you are very decidedly not the only one who gets why listening to Wu-Tang and reading a Kung-Fu movie review at the same time might be kind of funny.

Posted by: jerkygirl at September 22, 2006 5:48 PM

"men kicking the shit out of each other on a high wire is no more appealing than watching them do the same in mid-air, on a ladder, under a table, in a box, with a fox, etc."

Great stuff man.

Posted by: Me at September 23, 2006 11:20 AM

i think we all gotta be open-minded about everything.
plus who cares about critics
if u like whatever it is that u like, watch it
if u dont, then dont.

Posted by: david at September 23, 2006 3:58 PM

Grrr.... I hate when people yell during the movies. If you don't like it, just go home!

For the record, I'm not a fan of martial arts flicks, but it's the same idea with reviewing movies you plan on hating no matter what: if you are going to watch a movie with a completely closed mind, can't you just pass the review duties to someone else who will give it a chance?

Posted by: SV at September 23, 2006 8:54 PM

OK, I might be a slow female, but it would've been helpful to know that the movie was SUBTITLED. It's hard to go to a theater slightly buzzed, expect to be entertained with lots of great Jet Li fight scenes, and then realize I also have to freakin' read... pshaw!

Aside, it was definitely great to see Jet Li back into a more suitable role. "Unleashed" was uncomfortable for me on so many levels. The storyline was typical for the genre, so I would count this one to watch as a renter (and sober).

There was also a subliminal message in the movie as to why Golden Rice is good and lack of vitamin A is bad.

Posted by: Brooke at September 23, 2006 9:16 PM

No offense, anikitty, but if anyone, male or female, is yelling in my theatre, I'm dragging them out and kicking their ass. And if the boyfriend objects? I'm kicking his ass for not controlling his mouthy broad. Then I'm giving a ten to a bum because of karma.

Posted by: antianikitty at September 25, 2006 3:16 PM

Will your Mother allow that? Or will she make you to go back to your room?

Posted by: anikitty at September 25, 2006 4:26 PM

That was one hella funny review. Good one, Dustin!

Posted by: carrie at September 26, 2006 3:19 AM

Anikitty, to paraphrase Shepherd Book, there is a special hell reserved for people like you. The same hell reserved for child molesters.

Posted by: I Love Beets at September 26, 2006 9:00 AM

Here's a quarter...hopefully you use it to buy some perspective. I'm not sure that you can find it on the internet, but good luck.

I'm on par with a child molester?
I should be abused and beaten?
I'm a jerk?

Because I admitted to talking to the movie screen (and admitted that it was bad behavior) on TWO occassions.

Well thanks for the input, I'll be sure to incorporate it into my beliefs about myself and how the world works.

I'll use the quarter that I have left for my own therapy, so that I can mold myself into a person that you respect and who isn't as bad as a child abuser.

Posted by: anikitty at September 26, 2006 11:28 AM

I hope you do, anikitty. I really hope you do.

Posted by: antianikitty at September 26, 2006 2:28 PM

Anikitty, it's a line from an episode of Firefly.

"If you take sexual advantage of her, you're going to burn in a very special level of hell.
A level they reserve for child molesters and people who talk at the theater. "

Just a joke. Lighten up. And honestly, IMO, being rude in a movie theater twice is two times too many. That's all I'm trying to say. I don't get why you think it's acceptable (I don't recall you acknowledging any regret), but hey, that's your journey.

Posted by: I Love Beets at September 26, 2006 4:24 PM

Thank you beet-person. I was unaware of the quote. I think that your advice is correct for all of the people involved in this debate.

Posted by: anikitty at September 26, 2006 4:47 PM

Instead of reviewing the movie, you just kinda gave a play by play, disclaimers ins't an excuse for laziness. Goes to show I shouldn't be reading your opinions anymore.

Posted by: Cindy at September 27, 2006 9:10 AM

Anikitty, internet hugs all around!

Posted by: I Love Beets at September 27, 2006 9:53 AM

Very very lame, this is not even a review it's just the reviewer going on, and on, and on about how he doesn't even like the genre.
That was very beneath you sir.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at September 27, 2006 7:34 PM

Viewing a film in a theatre is a public experience, with that comes the public and all the good and bad it encapsulates. In a time when it costs anywhere from $7.50- 10.00 and up to go, people are going to pretty much feel entitled to behave however they please regardless of the cellphone silence requests and what have you. Furthermore, most films, if not outright escapism, are an expression of someone's ideas. When I can get those ideas for about four bucks by waiting a few months, I'm not about to waste the extra cash on a big screen and digital surround sound, unless it offers some serious eye candy in addition to a decent plot. If you're not sure how to tell beforehand, peep Pajiba or some lesser critic out there like Ebert, or your friend Jay. A lot of folks will simply settle for the eye candy. This probably explains why martial-arts, sci-fi, and slasher flicks are so popular in the theatre.

Having said all that, if you don't like public outbursts in a public setting, exert some of that immaculate self-control the rest of us in the human population seem to be lacking and rent it when the DVD comes out. Emotional outbursts are a part of life. Why do think people cry at weddings and laugh at funerals? Everybody is not you, so don't expect us to behave like you do. I know, I know, I keep forgetting, it's different when it's you. Talking to the screen in some sense is no different than laughing, crying, or walking out, it's just a different expression of emotion, which on this blog seems to be less socially acceptable.

Bottom line, you paid ten bucks, they paid ten bucks, deal with each other or wait for the rental when you can control the vertical and the horizontal. But by all means, ease up on all the threats and name calling. Must be the martial arts action has everyone's blood up, including me, I never post on this rag. S'usually a good read, comments included, and this time's no exception.

With all that out of the way, I'll just add this. I doubt I'll see this in the theater, simply because I'm usually too broke to rent, much less shell out the extra for the big screen. But I have to defend Jet Li's "Unleashed". He said in an interview I read several years ago, he was no longer interested in fighting movies for the sake of fighting movies, but rather wanted to start stretching as an actor. I saw "Unleashed" as an early attempt at such, and this movie is probably another step in that direction. I too grew up watching Saturday and Sunday afternoon Kung-fu flicks and Saturday night's "Shock Theatre" then later on Elvira's show, but that mainly for the cleavage as I was in my early teens. And just like comic books, I grew out of them, when I realized that Spider-Man wasn't going to die, and if he did, they would just bring him back, and moved on to deeper stuff. (Still like a good comic yarn from time to time, just not the super hero stuff.) So, all I'm saying is cut Jet some slack, he's trying to learn how to act, mainly because I guess he's realized that his decades-earned party trick is pretty much just that.

May we all experience deeper breaths and thoughts.

PS Matt, I think listening to Wu-tang is chuckle- worthy.

Posted by: New Millennium Craka at September 29, 2006 10:57 PM

Was the long plot summary to prove, despite the fact you were going to opt out of of reviewing the movie, that you did actually watch the movie? I could read a "review" of this quality in any local newspaper (shudder). I demand better from pajiba! I paid no good money to read this!

Posted by: mfd at October 2, 2006 10:24 PM