free counter with statistics Fast Food Nation | Pajiba - Scathing Reviews for Bitchy People

fastfood.jpg


Would You Like Coliform Bacteria with That?

Fast Food Nation / Jeremy C. Fox

Film Reviews | November 17, 2006 | Comments (19)


Eric Schlosser’s 2001 book Fast Food Nation — based on his series of Rolling Stone investigations into the dishonest, unsanitary, dangerous, and sometimes inhuman practices of the fast-food industry and those who provide its raw materials — was a rare book in both how much it illuminated and how many it reached. Aside from Bob Woodward’s biennial publications, few books of investigative journalism make it into the hands of average Americans, yet Schlosser’s exposé became a ubiquitous bestseller; indeed I picked up my copy when I finished my traveling novel early and could find nothing else in the airport bookshop that I wouldn’t be embarrassed to be seen with. It’s gripping reading, both confirming many things we knew or suspected and revealing relatively unknown corporate practices that range from merely unsavory to nigh-homicidal, but it hardly screams “Major Motion Picture.” Schlosser’s tone is engaging, but the book is structured around history lessons, anecdotes, and plain facts; there are plenty of villains but few heroes, and no real narrative connection to much of its material but for Schlosser’s quiet, journalistic presence.

Transforming such a book into a narrative form is never an easy task; adapting those statistics, anecdotes, and historical asides into something resembling a coherent storyline necessitates dropping much that is important or at least interesting and finding or faking associations between facts and incidents with little organic connection. In the face of such an unwieldy task, Schlosser and co-writer/director Richard Linklater have done an admirable job of synthesizing the material into the narrative. This, though, is not to say that the finished product is entirely effective as a film: While they manage both to convey many important facts and to engage in some earnest calls-to-action, the film treatment of Fast Food Nation is often a confusing, frustrating array of ambitions nearly, but not quite, fulfilled.

The first issue in adapting a nonfiction exposé like Schlosser’s is the tremendous amount of exposition required. Four hundred pages of information aren’t easy to cram into a feature film, even a two-hour one, particularly when the obvious (and usual) way to accomplish this is to turn half your characters into pedantic talking heads for long stretches. Linklater and Schlosser avoid this as much as they can, allowing us to directly witness many of the most disturbing aspects of the trip our Big Macs make from the farm to our bellies, but inevitably there are scenes that consist of nothing more than a long speech or two about the evils of Big Food. Most of these are delivered to Greg Kinnear, who plays a marketing executive recently recruited from ESPN to the fictional chain of Mickey’s hamburger joints (an obvious play on the common nickname for McDonald’s). When he’s sent by his boss to investigate reports of fecal contamination in the beef for their top product, Kinnear becomes an unwitting student of the ugly realities of the meatpacking industry.

Visiting Mickey’s beef supplier Uni-Globe Meatpacking, located in an endless strip-mall called Cody, Colorado, Kinnear initially believes the company’s claims of hygiene and safety. They give him a tour of the facility that shows nothing but pristine white rooms full of the most modern, well-maintained machinery, efficiently (and hypnotically) pressing out thousands of identical patties a minute. But a little digging reveals that he’s only seen half the story: He meets a rancher (Kris Kristofferson) who used to sell cattle to Uni-Globe and knows too well how they run their business and whose Chicana housekeeper (Raquel Gavia) bears horrific tales of the killing floor and the carelessness with which meat, innards, and, yes, shit are handled. Kinnear follows this meeting with a visit to a Mickey’s executive vice-president (Bruce Willis) who rationalizes away concerns about cleanliness and safety, explaining that Mickey’s has to make a few compromises to keep their profit margins high and letting Kinnear know that it’s not in his best interest to make a fuss. As the truth is gradually revealed, Kinnear comes off as sincere and reasonably bright, but not especially quick on the uptake, and as such he’s a natural stand-in for the typical middle-class American moviegoer.

Representing an entirely different demographic are Wilmer Valderrama (“That ’70s Show”), Catalina Sandino Moreno (Maria Full of Grace), and Ana Claudia Talancón (El Crimen del padre Amaro) as illegal Mexican immigrants come to work in a Colorado meatpacking plant. Their characters leave Mexico in a large group, losing one member in the night desert when they’re almost nabbed by border patrol, that then splits off into small groups for various towns in the western United States and the firms that are willing, even eager to take on illegals. These three also wind up in Cody, waiting in a ramshackle motel to be recruited by Uni-Globe, where they’ll be subjected to English-only training videos that they can’t possibly understand, unsafe working conditions, and sexual harassment by Bobby Cannavale (well, except for Valderrama).

The third major group of characters comes from right inside the local Mickey’s franchise, where we meet a bright, peppy high-school student (Ashley Johnson, best known as little Chrissy Seaver on “Growing Pains”) and her lazy, disgruntled coworkers (Paul Dano and Matt Hensarling). Johnson’s character is the kind of person you hate to see working in fast food, someone who clearly has the potential to do greater things but lacks either the opportunity or the ambition. She represents another group of potential viewers — the young idealists who’ll see this movie or read the book and become card-carrying PETA radicals. This is her trajectory, briefly, as she falls in with a group of student activists at the local college, but ultimately their earnest, misguided efforts at fomenting revolution prove futile, and she chooses to focus on changing her own life rather than trying to change the world.

The film’s structure is reminiscent of other ensemble films directed by Linklater, particularly his first feature, Slacker, in which the camera followed one character for a few minutes, watched him or her interact with someone else, and then continued by following that new character. The action isn’t quite so random here: We’re introduced to many of the characters through their interactions with others we’ve already met — as when we hang out to meet the Mickey’s employees after Kinnear stops in for a burger — but the bulk of the film cuts back and forth between a number of established characters, often contrasting their situations — as when a dozen or so illegals squeeze into their run-down motel room while Kinnear unpacks and casually half-watches lesbian porn in his Holiday Inn-type accommodations. But in several instances, we’re set up to anticipate events that never transpire, as though Linklater and Schlosser were satisfied with establishing their likelihood and implying their potential outcomes rather than delivering the goods.

Though the filmmakers don’t quite deliver on all they promise, neither do they pull any punches. We see the full variety of dangers and casual humiliations that workers in these industries are subjected to, and there is a sting that comes as each of their unhappy fates slide into place. The greatest sympathy lies with the illegal workers, who are the only characters whose futures seem entirely out of their own control, but, like the cattle slaughtered in the film’s grisly climactic scene, each character here is ultimately a cog in a much greater machine, one more vicious and uncaring than any individual could be.

Jeremy C. Fox is a founding critic of Pajiba and a member of the Online Film Critics Society.You may email him at jeremycfox[at]gmail.com.

ofcs.gif


Happy Feet | For Your Consideration



Comments

Reading this book turned me into a vegetarian. I can't imagine the film delivering information -- even the same information -- in such a compelling fashion.

Posted by: MJ at November 19, 2006 1:28 PM

I had high hopes, the trailer marketed the film as the fast food version of THANK YOU FOR SMOKING, which I thought was genius. Maybe an unfair comparision though, since that was clear satire. I think I'll wait for the DVD.

Posted by: Jenn at November 19, 2006 7:50 PM

Hey MJ, the book turned me into a vegetarian, too. I was teetering on the edge of it for a long time and that really pushed me over. I'm glad. I'll never go back.

Posted by: Kathy at November 19, 2006 11:40 PM

I know what you guys mean. After I read that book I can only eat animals that I personally slaughter.

Posted by: Murray at November 20, 2006 1:49 AM

This book was already written 100 years ago. It's called The Jungle by Upton Sinclair. The same problems were discussed: exploitation of immigrants (although, they were legal) and cleanliness in the meat packing industry. How upsetting that nothing has changed.

Posted by: Natalie at November 20, 2006 11:41 AM

I wanted to see this, but it only looks ok. I'll either read the book or wait for the DVD.

Natalie, I remember The Jungle; I read parts of it for school. They mentioned rats and other rodents (along with their feces) going into the meat, possibly the breakfast sausages. Pres. Roosevelt was disgusted. Nice, huh?

Posted by: Brie at November 20, 2006 3:29 PM

Good call on that one Natalie.

Posted by: G40 at November 20, 2006 4:07 PM

I work in the meat-packing industry and as far as our standards go, they are fairly high and consistently observed. Things may happen and sometimes do, but be assured that they are few and far between and production is shut down because of a little agency called the USDA. Let it also be known that rats can also (and do) inhabit Wal-Marts the world over and evidence of such can be seen. Just start going through the packs of flour or sugar and you will eventually come upon a few that have holes in them that were probably caused by rats. As far as illegal immigrants go, they had better have some damn good fake documents otherwise they will not work for my company. As far as training is concerned, since most of us are Hispanic, it will be given in several languages and also under the guidance of a mentor, who naturally has done that particular job for quite some time. You would not believe how hard it is to learn to cut meat properly (especially when you process over 5000 head a day). Everyone here is trained to the highest levels possible and all animals are slaughtered in concordance with the law.

Posted by: ScarletKnight at November 20, 2006 7:32 PM

ScarletKnight with the counterpunch! This review lacked substance, as I suspect the film does. Good call on the Jungle reference. Does this film provide a conclusion for the viewer to take home? Are we told to become vegetarians? Who are they trying to get us to sympathize with? The immigrants? The cattle? Ourselves?

Posted by: Sam at November 20, 2006 7:55 PM

I haven't read Fast Food Nation, personally I'd be more interested in the author's other book that focused on illegal immigrants, marijuana and porn. However, it has to be better than The Jungle. That book was like a blackly comic Grand Guignol exercise. I half-expected a comet to come out of the sky and brain poor Jurgis (I think). It was quite funny that that book was supposed to be a call to arms in the name of communism but everyone just said "holy crap, what is wrong with the meat industry?"

Posted by: Uptown Sinclair at November 21, 2006 5:16 PM

the meat industry is always trying to rationalize their practices. the way our "food" is raised and killed is absolutely horrendous. i believe that if people want to eat meat they should kill the animal themselves and if they are unable to fathom doing such a thing, then maybe they should rethink their diet. the meat industry and all others are about one thing, MONEY!!!! how can one expect not to be lied to by an industry that is based on the exploitation of animals,its workers and all of the people who eat the product.

Posted by: carol at November 22, 2006 1:01 PM

To carol:
The argument that you should only eat animals if you kill them yourself is a little strange. Do you live in a house that you personally built? Did you manufacture your own car? Do you produce your own television shows?
We are all consumers. The production of every product is an ugly, messy, disgusting process. Thankfully we live in a capitalist society that allows us to choose what to purchase and consume.

Posted by: Brian at November 23, 2006 10:26 AM

to brian:
no i do not live in a house i built, i rent an apartment, do not own a car and don't have cable vision. and yes brian, i am a comsumer and not ignorant to that fact. my point was that we [consumers] are kept in the dark where our products come from and some of us are willingly ignorant. the only thing that i can do is to try to be a little bit more aware and educated about what i am consuming. thankfully i have cut all ties with the meat industry and the dairy industry.

Posted by: carol at November 23, 2006 2:32 PM

Not all of us meat eaters are in the dark just because we don't, ney, Can't, go around slaughtering a pig or a cow every time we get the hankering for a cheeseburger or bacon with our breakfast.

One, I don't have the land to raise an animal and feed it,

two, I don't have the means to keep half of a cow or pig frozen for an extended period of time in my nice walk in freezer.

Three, I don't have the time to worry about raising an animal for the purposes of food and go about feeding it everyday.

That's why we have farmers and butchers and everyone else who do those things for us, because it would be stupid and impractical for everyone who eats meat to have to raise and slaughter and store their own animals. You don't grow your own corn and harvest your own vegetables and grind your own flower, do you? ( A little more on par with your example, as opposed to the making a house and car argument.)

I would love to see a doc. on the conditions of large scale grain and flower mills and sugar processing plants and every other large scale industry that is used to provide strict vegetarians with their diets. If you think for a second there are no amounts of rat shit going into the non-meat based foods you eat, you are kidding yourself.

Finally, if SuperSize Me only suceeded in making me drive to McDonalds 20 min. after the movie ended, something is telling me this movie isn't going to do the trick, either.

Posted by: some guy at November 24, 2006 1:33 AM

Not all of us meat eaters are in the dark just because we don't, ney, Can't, go around slaughtering a pig or a cow every time we get the hankering for a cheeseburger or bacon with our breakfast.

One, I don't have the land to raise an animal and feed it,

two, I don't have the means to keep half of a cow or pig frozen for an extended period of time in my nice walk in freezer.

Three, I don't have the time to worry about raising an animal for the purposes of food and go about feeding it everyday.

That's why we have farmers and butchers and everyone else who do those things for us, because it would be stupid and impractical for everyone who eats meat to have to raise and slaughter and store their own animals. You don't grow your own corn and harvest your own vegetables and grind your own flower, do you? ( A little more on par with your example, as opposed to the making a house and car argument.)

I would love to see a doc. on the conditions of large scale grain and flower mills and sugar processing plants and every other large scale industry that is used to provide strict vegetarians with their diets. If you think for a second there are no amounts of rat shit going into the non-meat based foods you eat, you are kidding yourself.

Finally, if SuperSize Me only suceeded in making me drive to McDonalds 20 min. after the movie ended, something is telling me this movie isn't going to do the trick, either.

Posted by: some guy at November 24, 2006 1:35 AM

Uhh, 'some guy'? When someone says they'll only eat animals that they slaughter themselves, that usually means they don't eat meat. Not that they have their own personal abattoir in the toolshed and a backyard full of livestock.
Or that they hunt. My landlord went the other week and now there's 165 lbs of moose meat in the chest freezer.
The movie? I'm glad it's not just a 2-hour talking head spiel, but I'll probably just read the book.

Posted by: L'original at November 24, 2006 8:45 AM

carol - plants have feelings too. didn't you read that study (not joking, this was an actual study)? they respond to pain. just imagine what it feels like for them to be raised in those horrible, unsanitary, crowded, chemical filled conditions. chilling. course, doesn't leave you with much to eat, does it?
meat is an integral part of the human diet. it's why we have sharp front teeth. could the industry use a cleanup? yeah. but i'm not sure if disrupting the natural balance of nutrients in your body is the best way to protest it...

Posted by: Ryan at December 6, 2006 6:13 PM

you're calling it sexual harassment? it was coerced sexual intercourse. it was sex in exchange for a job, for safety... come on. also, this storyline should have been made into a separate movie. it had nothing to do with the book, and i felt like the fact that it was just tossed into the mix really diminished the severity of that particular problem (which is very real for immigrant women and women in low paying jobs in general)-- it was also an excuse to show some on-screen f*cking. this movie was such a disappointment, and I don't know how Linklater and Schlessinger could bear putting their names on this piece of shit.

Posted by: melanie at April 10, 2007 10:40 AM

Recently rented and HATED this pile of crap movie.
Ghost Rider was better(and Ghost Rider was BAD).

Posted by: WhoWhatWhere at July 26, 2007 1:36 AM