free counter with statistics Falling Man | Scathing Reviews for Bitchy People

fallingman.jpg

Double D and the Towers

Falling Man by Don Delillo / Constance Howes

Film Reviews | June 25, 2007 | Comments (37)


I am addicted to “Top Chef.” I can’t help it. Watching human egos bash into each other like obscenely bloated bumper cars is beyond thrilling to me. In fact, it’s almost as exhilarating as watching questionably talented, ratings-conscious judges regularly rip the contestants shiny, new arseholes. On a recent episode of “Top Chef,” one of the contestants compared their own food prep skills to Michelangelo’s work in the Sistine Chapel, whining “Nobody told him how to paint!” You can’t fabricate more cringe-worthy comments, folks.

The success of the “Top” reality television run and its unabashed attempt to slice sociology right the hell in half with embarrassing glimpses into human behavior got me thinking about even more volatile contest themes. Like, what about Top Graffiti Artist? Top Gossip Blogger? Or, since I’m here to eventually review a book, Top Author? Just imagine it. Twelve to 14 authors all living in one house with their varied inner demons and drug addictions all geared up for messy melodrama. In America’s current state of well, war, I can gorram guarantee that some gung-ho literate would feel obligated to tackle the events of 9/11. During a particularly harsh smack down of the overly sentimental “Yes, it really is too soon for you or anyone else to dissect the entire nation’s post-traumatic stress” manuscript by the judges, I imagine the jilted author might indignantly claim to be “a modern messenger taking stock of the emotionally charged and politically relevant events of 9/11!” Then, the chastened contender would adjust their spectacles, refill their pitcher of whiskey and stagger back to the queue of neurotics. (If there’s one thing I’m mostly OK at, it’s stereotyping.)

So, let’s run screaming from my TV-addled imagination for a minute and rustle up writing magnate, Don Delillo. I mean, what Top Author wannabe wouldn’t kow-tow in deference to the great and powerful D.D.? White Noise has been on the lips and in the back pocket of every book-loving hipster worth their Saucony sneakers since 1985.

Delillo’s latest book, Falling Man does what my imaginary Top Author could not. Checking his sentimentality at the door, Delillo gives us a 9/11 from sharp fictional angles. The book’s title refers to Richard Drew’s infamous photograph featuring a man free-falling to his death after the North Twin Tower was hit. The title is also inspiration for the performance artist character who mimics the Falling Man pose at various NYC locations. This harnessed hanger appears at regular intervals a la Turn-Around-Norman, and lends heart-wrenching poetry to an otherwise cold, calculating narrative. The cold and calculating words are not meant to sound ishy. Really. 9/11 is a shark-infested topic that is much easier to emote over than it is to examine. Double D excels at this picking apart by unflinchingly thrusting his characters at one another: Longtime lovers, an American and a European, bicker constantly but eloquently about what the word God means to the terrorists. A writing teacher punches her neighbor for playing sitar music too loudly. Children scan the skies with binoculars waiting for more planes to come. Alzheimer’s patients attempt to remember and write about the attacks. A terrorist struggles to meld more seamlessly into his brothers’ deadly plan.

At one point, Delillo waxes descriptive about a main character’s escape from the Towers. This is more or less around the time that my guts began twisting into a splintery, Turk’s head knot (Look it up. It’s extra twisty). After a big, bad anything happens, it is often impossible to mentally process the event. In order to immediately deal, one might opt out of critical analysis and static cling to familiar habits — this avoidance isn’t a conscious choice or anything, it’s just how it has to go. Falling Man chronicles that kind of shock and does a pretty bang-up job of explaining what it might be like to sit at your work desk, hand around a warm cup of coffee and suddenly have your entire world, literally, come down around you.

Just for scuzz though, let’s all imagine that Don Delillo really is a contestant on my fictional TV show, “Top Author: All Stars.” In this little lame-tasy, I would be a pissy but incredibly attractive (well, it is a dream) judge from “Writers Ain’t Shit Review.” After D.D. submits Falling Man for the final writing challenge, I would be forced to mention that while reading his novel, there was often no clue as to which character was dialoguing it up until the fourth or fifth line of said dialogue. Seriously dude, while we understand that you might just be the pinnacle of Top Authorness, cluing your readers into what’s happening is kind of the whole point of storytelling. Character change cues let us know the vantage point of the statement and the experiences that are influencing it. Otherwise the word power is forever lost and your readers become jazzercised balls of irritation causing them to slam the book down and surf the internet for an hour … or something. Also, was the poker theme meant to be some kind of deep, reassuring metaphor about life, love and all the rest of it? Because honestly, I just kept thinking, “Poker? Really?

Constance Howes is a book critic for Pajiba and a graphic designer living in Philadelphia. Her hobbies include making out and messing shit up. In short, she’s a firecracker. She blogs over at I Love You in the Face.


Evan Almighty | Your Last Meal



Comments

Top Gossip Blogger? It's on, bitches.

Fantabulousistic first review, C!

Posted by: litelysalted at June 25, 2007 10:06 AM

Nice review. I don't know that I will be able to read this book. I really have a hard time with stuff based on 9/11.

Posted by: Erin at June 25, 2007 10:16 AM

Very entertaining review. Glad that there's another voice added to the mix. I like Delillo, so am happy about the review and I look forward to more of your good work.

Posted by: Spender at June 25, 2007 10:31 AM

I would love to see an Afternoon Comment Diversion on the five authors (living or dead) who we would like to see locked in a reality TV show house together (a la Big Brother) and charged with delivering jointly a chapter of a new book at the end of each episode. I would be all over that show.

Posted by: PaddyDog at June 25, 2007 11:14 AM

Forgot to add: that's one hell of a book cover. I stared at it for about 5 minutes before I even clicked on the review. I remember the photo from the NYT the day after, but I didn't think it would ever be used as a literary image. Not sure how I feel about it to be honest. I don't think it's too soon to have books referencing 911 (actually Audrey Niffenberger did it brilliantly in The Time Travelers Wife), but using that photo on the cover of a work of fiction just makes me feel a little uncomfortable.

Posted by: PaddyDog at June 25, 2007 11:18 AM

Aw, c'mon. We don't watch reality TV to see people think. Where's the fun in that?

Nice review. DeLillo's hard for me to read because I end up going off on mental tangents and have to come back to his train of thought.

Posted by: Wednesday at June 25, 2007 11:21 AM

Nicely done C-Haich, very nicely done. You're just going to get better from here.

Posted by: Rebecca H. at June 25, 2007 11:35 AM

Nice Tom Robbins reference.

Posted by: Brianne at June 25, 2007 12:17 PM

Well done CH! Good to "hear" a new voice on this blog. If you have some spare time, perhaps you could give a few pointers to Agent Bedhead. (See A Mighty Heart review and comment thread).

The girls are all in a dither and have confused criticism of the movie (in that case) with personal vendettum. Why, we even have references to circular self-gratification!

Good to be reminded that the overwhelming majority of critics and commenters on this site can stay "on topic" and offer useful and insightful criticism.

Posted by: rudy at June 25, 2007 12:18 PM

Character change cues let us know the vantage point of the statement and the experiences that are influencing it. Otherwise the word power is forever lost and your readers become jazzercised balls of irritation causing them to slam the book down and surf the internet for an hour ... or something.

This is precisely why I hated White Noise.

Posted by: tetetetigi at June 25, 2007 12:35 PM

i loved this book. his best in a long while. made up for the stink that was cosmopolis.

Posted by: jordan at June 25, 2007 12:36 PM

oh and paddydog, only the picture on the left is the cover. its just a blue sky with some sort of pole jutting out of it. at least every copy ive seen. the man actually falling is not on it.

Posted by: jordan at June 25, 2007 12:39 PM

Disagree, if you will, with AB's assessment of "A Mighty Heart", Rudy, but is it necessary to disparage the individual? I found Bedhead's take to be interesting and informative.
While you state that it's '...good to be reminded that the overwhelming majority of critics and commenters on this site can stay "on topic" and offer useful and insightful criticism...', not once in your post do you mention Delillo; the book or C's review.
Just saying.......

Posted by: Spender at June 25, 2007 12:53 PM

Jordan: Thanks for the clarification. That makes a lot more sense. I was wondering how they got to use that.

Wednesday: I wasn't actually thinking we'd watch authors think, I was going more along the lines of forcing J.D. Salinger, Brett Easton Ellis and Jackie Collins to share a home and write together and get into bitch-fests. Sorry. I'm just that low.

Posted by: PaddyDog at June 25, 2007 1:00 PM

I've been waiting for DeLillo to write about 9/11 for a while, as I was so disgusted and appalled by the "non-fiction" tell-alls and conspiracy theory books hitting the Barnes & Noble shelves by January 2002, I knew that DeLillo had the ability to humanize the event with his themes of internal solidarity and almost solipsistic narration.

Thank you for reviewing this book, but no thanks for reviewing or even acknowledging the money-making atrocity of a movie Flight 93.


P.S. Oh, Jordan, Cosmopolis totally sucked right?!

Posted by: Nico at June 25, 2007 1:01 PM

Thanks for the warm reception! I feel so loved. And Paddydog, the authors you've selected for Top Author are right on the darn money. (I'm also that low)

Posted by: Constance at June 25, 2007 1:23 PM

I am genuinely excited, CH. Fun review. I hope this/you becomes a regular feature; starting out of the gate with DD in one hand and 9/11 in the other is quite the spectacle!

Posted by: Ranylt at June 25, 2007 1:33 PM

I'd audition for Top Author.

Then again, I've also auditioned for American Idol, American Inventor, Making the Band 4, and was partly recruited by The Real World, so I'm a famewhore anyway.

Still, I'd love to be the only non-alchie in the house, obviously causing tension and ensuring me ample screentime talking about how everyone's picking on me because I won't drink their brown fire water.

Posted by: Robert at June 25, 2007 1:44 PM

What is Turn-Around-Norman? Googled it and all I can find is some Virginia hardcore band.

Posted by: isabelle at June 25, 2007 2:19 PM

you had me at 'gorram'

welcome aboard constantinople

Posted by: MAx at June 25, 2007 4:15 PM

Turn-Around-Norman is a character in Tom Robbins' "Skinny Legs & All" which is another fantastic book. (Well, except for some of the extended monologues but those can be ignored without missing too much of the plot;)

Posted by: Constance at June 25, 2007 4:33 PM

Sorry Spender, I began my comment with a "Well done" shoutout to CH. I had nothing more to add. I agree with her assessment of the book. I try mightily not to comment unneccessarily.

n.b., I commented on CH's (the critic's) assessment of the book (her task). Compare that to AB's dreadful putative "review" of A Mighty Heart where she was so distracted by an actor's lips that she did not perform the task at hand, which was to review the movie. This observation called out the defense rangers who engaged in ad hominem attacks on any commenter within cyber-spitting range. Completely unnecessary but entertaining nonetheless. As I stated there, "Well, consider me fully chastised. I have no defense but of actually holding an opinion (go ahead, re-read the putative "review") to your rapier wits. I bleed with the lacerations of your jousts and parries. No mas!"

Posted by: rudy at June 25, 2007 4:57 PM

"Gorram"

Oh, Constance, I rutting think I'm in love with a book reviewer. *shudder* If I could laconically curse in Chinese, I would.

Add me to the list of people not especially impressed by "White Noise," and I didn't like "Underworld" either. *ducks hail of gunfire* Sorry.

Posted by: socalledonlycousins at June 25, 2007 5:02 PM

Ah, thank you for the eplanation, Constance, and welcome to our beloved Scathing Reviews.
p.s. I like your site, too. Yay for more things to kill my time.

Posted by: isabelle at June 25, 2007 6:31 PM

Lovely review. Welcome, Constance!

And may I also voice my excitement at the possibility of more frequent book reviews? When I was in middle school I had a sweatshirt that said, "So many books... so little time." I wore it all the time. If it still fit me, I'd probably still wear it. Sans irony, even.

Uh, anyway... I must now admit to (somehow) never having read a single thing by Don Delillo. I must now rectify that.

And, rudy - I'm glad you're impressed with your own cleverness, but is it necessary to pimp your comments from the review of "A Mighty Heart" in this review as well? I mean, if we're taking people to task for not staying on topic...

And Top Author? Sign me up! To watch, I mean. And snicker. Because that would be awesome.

Posted by: alanna at June 25, 2007 6:33 PM

eplanation: noun. [ee' plah nay' shun] An explanation made electronically, as on a website or "blog."
Actual word, used on purpose, and in no way a typo. Ahem.

Posted by: isabelle at June 25, 2007 6:37 PM

It took me a sec to recognize the name but I had a bad feeling about Don DeLillo, and now I remember why: Mao II. The worst book I've read in the past year.

Posted by: Geetch at June 25, 2007 6:41 PM

I would so watch Top Author, especially with PaddyDog's selections. Fun!
Thanks for the review-

Posted by: demondoll at June 25, 2007 6:44 PM

Yep, 9/11 is just going to have to be one of my historical and literary blind spots forever and ever, 'til my last day on earth. I was there, I lived it.

Never say never, I guess, I might be an 84 year old woman reading some book on it someday. But I kind of doubt it. Not even fictionalized stuff about it.

Just....no. And that picture? Haunts me.

Posted by: Kathy at June 25, 2007 8:19 PM

Good stuff. Welcome to the site.

Posted by: Kevin Longrie at June 25, 2007 8:39 PM

This seems like a (mostly) positive review. However, this:

Double D excels at this picking apart by unflinchingly thrusting his characters at one another: Longtime lovers, an American and a European, bicker constantly but eloquently about what the word God means to the terrorists. A writing teacher punches her neighbor for playing sitar music too loudly. Children scan the skies with binoculars waiting for more planes to come. Alzheimer's patients attempt to remember and write about the attacks. A terrorist struggles to meld more seamlessly into his brothers' deadly plan.

Makes me want to run away from this book as fast as possible.

Just me?

Posted by: zenhound at June 25, 2007 9:32 PM

Paddydog: add in Hemingway and
Fitzgerald and I'm all over that show! Let the mayhem begin!

Posted by: Trixie at June 26, 2007 12:17 AM

Sorry alanna, You have to read all the comments. Spender raised the topic of comments in other threads. I merely wanted CH to give a few hints on how to write a reivew to AB. CH did a great job in her debut review while AB was too distracted by inconsequential physical characteristics of an actor and failed to perform her task.

Our task is commenting on reviews. I see no deviation. Good to know, however, that the comment police are out in force.

Posted by: rudy at June 26, 2007 7:02 AM

Don DeLillo makes me want to puke. I had to read five of his novels (FIVE Delillos in four months; holy crap!! Don't ever do that to yourself) for my senior seminar class, which I took only because the professor is a published and well-respected author in the literary community. BIG mistake. He was absolutely enamored of Delillo, and when I wrote my final paper about how DD should basically just, well, shut the fuck up and tell a story already, I solidified my B grade in the class. I suspect that DD might be brilliant and that I am probably not as smart as I always thought I was or just too lazy to attempt him. I'm thinking it's probably both.

For people who have't read him before and are thinking about trying him out, be forewarned: he's definitely not casual, before-you-go-to-bed reading. And now that I've graduated college, I just don't want to work that hard to read a book anymore. I guess that's more of an indictment of myself, not Delillo, but I'm being honest here. You may think you're an intellectual, but you can test that theory by figuring out whether or not you can read Delillo for pleasure. May God have mercy on your soul.

Posted by: tinmo at June 26, 2007 7:17 AM

DeLillo's a poet. Period.

Granted, his unparalleled ability to create an absolutely gorgeous mosaic using nothing but the English language rarely makes for an easy read, but I'd trade any storytelling ability I might have in a heartbeat to be able to do what he does.

Incidentally, if you feeling like slamming DeLillo feel free, but you'd better damn well not sing the praises of Eggers in the same breath, because he's essentially doing the same thing -- lovingly admiring the sound of his own goddamned voice at the cost of everything else.

www.DeusExMalcontent.blogspot.com

Posted by: Chez at June 26, 2007 1:13 PM

As a blogger for Top Chef,http://www.bloggingtopchef.blogspot.com/,I share your obsession. You cannot taste the food but you think you are somehow a better judge then those actually tasting it.

Posted by: chef biatch at July 14, 2007 3:26 AM

As a blogger for Top Chef,I share your obsession. You cannot taste the food but you think you are somehow a better judge then those actually tasting it.

Posted by: chef biatch at July 14, 2007 3:27 AM