free counter with statistics Fall, The | Scathing Reviews for Bitchy People

fall1.jpg

Boredom’s Not a Burden Anyone Should Bear

The Fall / Brian Prisco

Film Reviews | May 14, 2008 | Comments (43)


Mother Goose wants you dead. Her nursery rhymes are full of babies falling out of trees, children toppling from wells and splitting their skulls open, bridges collapsing, and general chaos and horror befalling the young. Like the gothic sketches accompanying Through the Looking Glass, The Fall weaves its terrifying narrative with bizarre imagery and lush fantastic landscapes. But ultimately, like an opium-addled house of cards, the entire project falls apart under the weight of its own dreary narrative and mind-numbing “artistry.” A lot of people will be lured in by supposed similarity to Pan’s Labyrinth or The City of Lost Children. However, this Pied Piper’s song quickly blats sour notes. You’ll find yourself longing for substance rather than arbitrary visual treats, like a disappointed diabetic visiting Hansel and Gretel’s witch.

The Fall tells the story of Alexandria (Catinca Untaru), a precocious young girl wandering around a the grounds of a hospital in 1920s Los Angeles. She has been laid up with a broken arm after falling from an orange grove tree where she’d been picking fruit with her family. While exploring the hospital, she comes upon Roy (Lee Pace), an injured stuntman who appears to have paralyzed himself while trying to impress his lady love during a movie shoot. Roy enchants Alexandria with an epic story of adventure and spectacle, and we are catapulted through her vivid imagination into a world of swimming elephants and multi-cultural warriors swathed in a crayon-rainbow of garbs. Just as we’re settling in for a wild, insanely crafted adventure, we’re yanked from the story and thrust back into the drab real world. That’s how we spend the next two hours, bounding from painted miracle to morbid doldrums like they reshot the video for A-Ha’s “Take on Me” with The Smiths.

There are two combating narratives fighting for attention in this, and both are filtered through the eyes of a 5-year-old girl. In the hands of a more deft filmmaker or screenwriter, this could have been powerfully effective; here, it’s just uneven, confusing, and erratic. Neither story is particularly well-told or captivating, but you wish for more of the fantasy because at least it’s pretty to look at. And it is. The world of Roy’s story is cinematically glorious, with orange deserts and enormous blue skies. A character explodes from a flaming tree, his long dreadlocks knotted like tree branches. An enormous white sail absorbs the blood of a fallen comrade and we see it seep its way skyward, with a verdant hillside and rippling sky behind it. It’s fucking gorgeous. It’s just a damn shame that we’re subjected to such a sloppy story placed in it.

At least it’s an escape from the tragically heavy-handed narrative that takes place in the hospital. You see, Roy is suicidal, though it’s never made explicitly clear whether it’s from his true love shacking up with the star of the film or from the fact he might never get out of bed. Whatever the case, Roy has decided to off himself. He uses his story of bandits and revenge to trick the immigrant child into stealing a bottle of morphine for him so he can kill himself. Not once, but twice. The real-world narrative spirals down a black, slimed sewer drain into more murk and misery, culminating in Alexandria’s suffering a massive head injury that plunges her into a nightmare puppetry sequence straight out of a Tool video for a funeral dirge. Then it gets even more horribly dark and depressing.

I have nothing against dark children’s stories. In fact, some of my favorite films are bleak fairy tales like The Dark Crystal or The Last Unicorn. But this movie is like The Princess Bride if Peter Falk were suffering from dementia, and midway though the telling he tries to bludgeon Fred Savage to a bloody Giants-pajama-wearing pulp.

The Fall is directed by Tarsem Singh, going simply by Tarsem, apparently hoping that withholding his last name will protect him from people who remember The Cell, another visually arresting crapfest. Awesomeness abounds, but more often than not it seems like things are weird for weirdness’ sake. Much like The Wizard of Oz, the characters for the fantasy are culled from people in the hospital, but inexplicably so. Nothing is ever given explanation or depth, so they exist as cartoons. The Indian, though described as a Sioux, becomes transformed into a Pakistani. This could be expressed by the young girl’s misunderstanding, but there’s also an Italian explosives expert who for some reason or another is dressed in a Chinese robe and hat. Even more bizarre, one of the heroes is Charles Darwin, only he dresses like one of the droogies from A Clockwork Orange, except for a shag red peacock coat and a pet monkey named Wallace. There’s no viable reason for Darwin to be here. At all.

Much of the movie consists of strange excess and unexplained phenomena. It’s weirdly violent and unsure what tone to take with the brutality: A chandelier is made from the skinned corpses of the bandit-hero’s brother and his companions. One of the characters is riddled with arrows and comes to rest with a smile on his face on his back, resting on the protruding arrows. A character chokes up blood in a pool, drowning and struggling as the young girl weeps hysterically. The tone throughout the movie is problematic, dancing erratically from playful to morose.

Which is a shame, because the acting is terrific for the most part. The young Untaru is adorable, and she handles most of the emotions with charm and pathos. Her dialogue is strange; since her character is both extremely young and supposedly foreign, she constantly mumbles and speaks over the other characters, often saying, “What? What?” as if she were auditioning for a Lil’ Jon video. But poor Pace needs a new agent. He manages to rise above the material in all of his projects, even being one of the bright spots in the odious Miss Pettigrew Lives for a Day. Such is the case here. He’s so delightful as Roy, even when he’s a miserable child-torturing mope, you almost feel sorry he has to actually speak the awful dialogue from a script by Tarsem, Dan Gilroy, and Nico Soultanakis.

I can easily see The Fall as being a favorite for some folks. They’ll get swept under by the dazzling imagery and gasp at the brief bubbles of humor on this otherwise crushingly morbid tale. But the cinematographic wizardry and lush backdrops do little to distract from the boring narrative. It ultimately disappoints because you can see what this movie could have been but cannot forgive it for what it actually is. Which is crap. Tarsem needs to stick to the music videos and leave the storytelling to the Gilliams and Burtons.

Brian Prisco is a warrior-poet from the valley of North Hollywood, by way of Philadelphia. He wastes most of his life in desk jobs, biding his time until he finally becomes an actor, a writer, or cannon fodder in the inevitable zombie invasion. He can be found shaking his fist and angrily shouting at clouds on his blog, The Gospel According to Prisco.


ABC's 2008 Fall Schedule | What's Your Favorite Quote?



Comments

Waail! But Lee Pace is so pretty!

Posted by: coveredinbees at May 14, 2008 12:39 PM

You should have kept digging, Brian.

Posted by: Adere at May 14, 2008 12:51 PM

As I have said before, I am a sucker for pretty cinematography with nothing to back it up. I'll probably watch this and The Cell back to back with ample libations to make sure I don't pay any attention to that silly thing called "plot". I just want my moving art, damnit.

And yes, coveredinbees, Lee Pace is pretty.

Posted by: Genny (also Rusty) at May 14, 2008 12:51 PM

Wait - so those are Lee Pace's arms in the header image? No wonder I was drooling uncontrollably.

Posted by: Kolby at May 14, 2008 12:51 PM

But this movie is like The Princess Bride if Peter Falk were suffering from dementia, and midway though the telling he tries to bludgeon Fred Savage to a bloody Giants-pajama-wearing pulp.

hee!
I absolutely love your reviews Brian, I find myself alternating between "what an excellent well-argued point" to "that is the funniest fuckin thing I have read all week". a lot.

that said, when will directors figure out that you cannot just substitute wonderful settings and bright colors for plot and character development and still have a successful film (story-wise, not money-wise)? drives me nuts

and coveredinbees, I say we go hunt down Lee and offer our (ahem) services as agents

that boy needs some help

Posted by: Bethy at May 14, 2008 12:53 PM

Ah, damn.

Posted by: twig at May 14, 2008 1:00 PM

When I saw Miss Pettigrew I was content to gaze at him and the boy I was with was content to gaze at Amy Adams and neither of us noticed that the movie wasn't all that and a bag of chips. The power of pretty.

Posted by: coveredinbees at May 14, 2008 1:02 PM

Oh Prisco, you may be sneaking up on the coveted title of my favorite reviewer. Your light sprinkling of the greatest references always makes me smile. (For those interested, I do have a standing list, I shant post it, for fear of incurring TK's wrath.)

Posted by: Tyranthesaurus Rex at May 14, 2008 1:18 PM

You know....I kind of liked the Cell. The story was crap, J.Lo was...crap, but it was different. Kind of like MirrorMask, another style over substance movie. But hey, I'm a sucker for style.

Oh, except for the disemboweling part of the Cel. Icky Icky.

Posted by: meh at May 14, 2008 1:27 PM

Kind of like MirrorMask, another style over substance movie.

I did like Valentine quite a bit.

"Nooo! I don't want to be a waiter!"

Posted by: twig at May 14, 2008 1:46 PM

Shoot. I have really been looking forward to this film. I'll still see it, but you have lowered my expectations.

Posted by: docsmartypants at May 14, 2008 1:49 PM

I keep thinking that the photo associated with this movie is a still from The Three Amigos. And that makes me very happy.

"Yip yip yip yip yip yip yip yip yip NANNY!" [shoots gun]

Posted by: Julie at May 14, 2008 1:50 PM

Re. Darwin and his monkey: Interesting--a fellow by the name of Alfred Wallace formulated the theory of evolution by natural selection around the same time as Darwin (some say before Darwin), though he didn't use the term "natural selection." He was credited as a co-discoverer; however, he was never given as much recognition (obviously).

Now he's Darwin's pet monkey in a mediocre film.

Poor ol' Wallace.

Posted by: MO at May 14, 2008 1:54 PM

Me too meh. I don't care all that much if there's no plot if the imagery is so strange and beautiful. (I remember coming out of the Cell with friends and they were like, "What kind of sick, twisted mind comes up with that kind of imagery," and I was all like "Uh....your dreams don't look like that?" Tarsem should call me, I have 25 years worth of twisted nightmares to mine. I dreamed my brother was beheaded when I was like, 6. The very first dream I ever remember having my mom got her hand chopped off. It only gets worse from there.)

Posted by: s. pisaster at May 14, 2008 1:56 PM

"Yip yip yip yip yip yip yip yip yip NANNY!" [shoots gun]

I love you, Julie.

Posted by: Kolby at May 14, 2008 1:58 PM

Julie! You just shot The Invisible Swordsman!

And secondary thought: The Three Amigos! is the only movie in which I have ever liked Martin Short. I can't stand the man in anything else.

Posted by: Bistro at May 14, 2008 2:13 PM

I loved it, but I get that it's boring. Lemme clear up a few things I learned at a Q&A with Lee and Tarsem.

1. This was Lee's second movie (first was A Soldier's Girl), so thus it helped him get an agent. Tarsem picked him because he wanted an unknown. Only bad part was the movie took four years to make.

2. They shot it as a documentary to appease the little girl. And thus, Tarsem LIED to the entire crew and cast and told them that Lee Pace was truly paralyzed for the first half of the shoot!!! Crazy, I know. So this is truly why Catinca is saying "what" all over the place. She really didn't understand because she barely knew english!

3. Since Tarsem basically just wanted to tell a blanket story involving locations he collected for over 23 years, he simply changed the script willy nilly to fit his budget and characters.

Like you said, it's beautiful. And it was shot in over 24 countries on Tarsem's own dime. He simply kept living off making commercials and selling off his things until it was time to sell the house. Then, he was like, "It's done". Fincher helped him get distribution and the rest is history. I say see just to help the man not lose his house, okay?

Read more of my write up on the Q/A on my blog, if you like.

Good review, Brian.

Posted by: Teresa at May 14, 2008 2:14 PM

I love the fact that you name-drop three of the defining kids' movies of my generation: The Last Unicorn, The Dark Crystal, and The Princess Bride. Throw in a little Labyrinth and we've got a party!

Posted by: Ariel at May 14, 2008 2:21 PM

Ah, Lee Pace. I love his salsa.

Posted by: Kevin Longrie at May 14, 2008 2:27 PM

"But this movie is like The Princess Bride if Peter Falk were suffering from dementia, and midway though the telling he tries to bludgeon Fred Savage to a bloody Giants-pajama-wearing pulp."

Savage wasn't wearing Giants pajamas, he was a Bears fan in that film. Everything in that room was Chicago.

Posted by: thejodester at May 14, 2008 2:51 PM

I figured this one would be a hollow beauty, like an incomplete Fabergé egg-all fancypants on the outside but open it up and there's no magic toy inside.

But I ADORE Lee Pace, and since Pushing Daises shuffled off to Buffalo, I am jonesing for a fix.

This one looks like a good entry in the Blu-Ray collection. Mr. Pink can ogle the technology while I ogle Lee Pace's biceps.

Posted by: Alabamapink at May 14, 2008 2:59 PM

Damn you, Prisco. Damn you straight to hell.

Nice work.

Posted by: TK at May 14, 2008 3:00 PM

The Facts Were These:
Lee Pace, after staring in the adorable Miss Pettigrew, decided to do a movie that was artsy and pretty to look at. However, the Piemaker soon realized that him mourning over some random princess with a cool hat and a lavish wardrobe could just be stopped by him touching her and bringing her back to life. Though it might sound easy, he much preferred his childhood sweetheart Chuck, over the princess. After growing tired of wearing guyliner and showing off his abs, the Piemaker decided that if he was to set things straight, he would have to return to the Pie Hole so that a certain kamikaze feminist can watch Pushing Daisies like a crack fiend and feel joy after having to wait for x number of months to get their dose of Anna Friel heroin.
P.S Kamikaze Feminist should probably watch Pan's Labyrinth NOW.

Posted by: Kamikaze Feminist at May 14, 2008 3:06 PM

Awww, Kamikaze Feminist, you just made me miss 'Pushing Daisies' even more. I now have Jim Dale's voice running through my head.

Posted by: Mimi at May 14, 2008 3:19 PM

"The Three Amigos! is the only movie in which I have ever liked Martin Short. I can't stand the man in anything else."

Same. No Jiminy Glick love? His appearance plus his name never fail to crack me up ... and then he starts talking.

I really wanted to love this movie. Damn it.

Posted by: Mick J at May 14, 2008 3:40 PM

Just wanted to say that I love the Tool ispired title. It's to bad that the movie sounds no good. It always seems like the movies like this, the ones where the lush imagery are the center piece, always tend to suck. The people behind these things forget that this is not a visual art exibition, it's a movie. Having a descent plot, you know, kinda helps

Posted by: blahmeh at May 14, 2008 5:36 PM

I cordially disagree. I see where you're coming from, and I'm not a critic, so I won't get into it, but yeah, I cordially disagree. There were so many things that made this movie interesting. But you saw people like me coming.
Enough.

Posted by: jackie at May 14, 2008 5:52 PM

Teresa and Jackie, thank you both for dissenting eloquently and passionately. I don't think less of you for liking this, and I can understand why you do. This is forever going to be one of those movies that people love or loathe, and there will be no middle ground. I do think that people should see this movie. I really do. I was just horrifyingly disappointed. Especially knowing that it was produced by Spike Jonze and David Fincher, two of my favorite directors. I was hoping for Baron Munchausen, and it just fell short for me. I know there are people who will see this and just think I'm a complete asshole. Which I am, but for totally different reasons.

Oh, and Teresa, thank you for the info. That does explain a lot of my issues and how things seemed so wonky. But I gotta say, Todd Solondz had to do the same thing with Palindromes, and it might very well have wrecked his career. I would actually be really interested in seeing Tarsem direct Charlie Kaufman or Zach Helm.

Posted by: insertclevernamehere at May 14, 2008 6:18 PM

Nice Tool reference in the title!

Posted by: bearno at May 14, 2008 6:57 PM

I was so hoping for this to be good- the preview completely captivated me. I am still going to see it though for Lee Pace. It's funny, because even though I loved him as the brother in Wonder Falls, and also loved him in Pushing Daisies- i never see him as one actor. He just completely becomes those characters (even if in Wonderfalls he was a bit-ish part)

Posted by: dene at May 14, 2008 7:22 PM

I was really excited about this movie when I saw the trailer, and now, after reading the review...I think I still am. I am, being a book nerd, a sucker for stories, and love seeing them told in new ways, even if sometimes they fail. I think my art major friend and I will get together and love this for what it is, and fill in the things it's not. After all, it's still going to be better than most of the movies out right now where no one tries at all. It sounds like somebody (even if that somebody is a little messed up and maybe let their concentration wander a little bit) put pieces of their heart and soul into this, and from the review and the trailer, it looks like there's a lot of material of merit there. Excellent review.

Posted by: BiblioGeek at May 14, 2008 10:42 PM

Why did I think this was going to be about the band?

Posted by: Pheagan at May 14, 2008 11:21 PM

Great review. (Even though really, does any movie NEED a reason to have Charles Darwin in it? No! I mean, wouldn't let's say, Knocked Up be way more interesting if Darwin was in it?)

My expectations for this movie seeing as how 1) Lee Pace is in it and 2) the visuals are mind blowing were a wee bit unrealistic. So now they've shrunken down to size... anyways, I'm babbling. Cannot wait to see it (even with much lowered expectations)!

Posted by: io at May 15, 2008 2:22 AM

The Cell fascinated me so much that it is one of the few movies I've ever felt impelled to write a comprehensive account of my impressions about on my blog. No doubt that on some levels, it's deeply flawed - but I found it almost entirely unlike anything else I'd seen, which made it a worthwhile watch in and of itself.

Here's the blog post, in case anyone's interested.

Posted by: Dill The Devil at May 15, 2008 5:26 AM

I saw this movie last weekend and it is not in the top 2,567,895 movies ever made. It reminds me of when I had crushes on good looking people as a kid and then learning their assholes. Yes, they are pretty to look at but you don't want to get to know them.

All of the people who say this movie is worthwhile are the same people who would spend all day digging through a pile of shit in hopes of finding a pony.

Posted by: The Land Snark at May 15, 2008 12:29 PM

All of the people who say this movie is worthwhile are the same people who would spend all day digging through a pile of shit in hopes of finding a pony.

Interesting imagery...

Posted by: KatSings at May 15, 2008 2:21 PM

Bethy, you offer your service as an agent, I'll offer services of an entirely different kind. Lee Pace, sigh...

Posted by: becca at May 16, 2008 4:17 PM

I remain amazed by how differently people can come away from the same experience. I thought The Fall was wonderful, if not perfect, and that a number of the supposed "inconsistencies" (e.g. what the Italian was doing wearing Chinese robes and why the bandit crew was actually staff by people in the hospital) require the watcher to keep in mind that what we're watching is the story as filtered through an excitable child's mind.

I was frankly surprised by how many laughlines the movie had too...Tarsem definitely has an ear for comedic dialogue and it's pretty impressive how much of it came through as delivered by a very young girl just learning English speaking naturally. I would really want to go see it again right away if not for the fact that the pathos of Roy's condition is genuinely affecting and pretty hard to watch.

Posted by: le mike at May 28, 2008 4:19 PM

After watching this film I wanted to run right back inside the theater and watch it again. I absolutely loved it...and I thought the humor and the so called "inconsistencies" were the best part. It was beautifully filmed (as you already established), but it was more than just a promenade of pretty images, imho. Moreover, Catinca Untaru has got to be the cutest thing I've ever seen.

Posted by: lux at June 3, 2008 5:21 PM

I kept giving this shitty film chance after chance, but finally walked out when the little girl turned up in the "epic tale" to save the fucking day.

The humor was so base and moronic my eyes were left strained from rolling so much.

Everyone else in the theater seemed to be enjoying it, sadly.

I can't believe I missed seeing these assholes - especially Alexandria, who was cute at first but got really goddamn annoying really goddamn quickly - get what was coming to them, though. Damn, that will teach me to leave a movie early.

Someone give me spoilers? Does she get her scalp ripped off by the ice tongs guy? Her intestines torn out and maypoled around her by 3 sepia colored circus clown midgets?

If the pay off for sitting through such an aggressively uninteresting shit fest was as awesome as any of that then forgive me, movie, you're far more clever than I gave you credit for.

It not? Fuck you.

Posted by: sia at June 5, 2008 11:47 AM

I've not said this very often in my life, but; this review is wrong. It is completely wrong.

This is a beautiful movie about storytelling and the audience's interaction with the story. It's about letting go, it's about imagination, it's fucking gorgeous to look at and it has a very solid script.

The only reason to give this a bad review is if you don't like this kind of film. Don't say it's bad at what it's trying to do, say you don't like this genre.

Posted by: Ben (The Harry Potter-Bashing Troll) at September 12, 2008 10:33 AM

I'm one of the folks making it a favourite


I honestly ...well actually its a fantastic review but I politely disagree =)

I was indeed swept away by the fantastic visual imagery, charmed by the performances( I had a crush on Pace before this, now I'm pretty much head over heels in love) and dazzled by the film as a whole


I am a sucker for films where fantasy is used as an escape for dark, dreary or depressing reality, I adore the whole 'escapism' aspect of film making and adore it more when a great visual mind like Tarsem's is given full reign and allowed to just flow and unleash the true potential of imagination

This film is a bout two very lonely people finding one another and creating something woderful and freeing, about the ways we use each other, about the way we use stories to not just communicate but to cope


SPOILER (sort of)

as those who have seen the film know, the story he tells to Alexandria is what saves Roy's life, by telling it, by drawing her in and creating a connection, a shared ...something, he creates some one who cares enough to not only want him to want to live, but to weepingly beg him to do so.

I agree with Ben, if this sort of film isn't your bag, you are probably going to hate it( but dont pretend the visual imagery anf frankly, ART WORK on display in this film didn't steal your breath away) But if you did like Pans Labyrynth, The City of Lost Children, etc, then this film will pick you up and carry you away to some where beautiful


I am a ...vocal complainer about people seeing films based on the opinions of others, so dont see it just because I've said so....but watch the trailer


I was interested in this film, I saw the trailer and I was crying during that....so give the trailer a chance, if nothing, and go from there...


I guarantee you wont be disappointed

Unless...like I say....this sort of film isn't your thing...in which case....nothing really...=D

Posted by: Nadine at September 17, 2008 6:47 AM

Dear lord, sometimes you people are pretentious. What's the point of watching movies? Entertainment. This movie probably had the most beautiful imagery/cinematography I have ever seen. The story was simple, which I appreciate, because anything more would have probably been overloaded and overambitious. The main characters were fairly well fleshed out, and the side characters are supposed to be 1-dimensional characters thought up by a little girl. Lee Pace and the girl are fantastic actors, and the plot moved along well. Sure, some plot points were breezed over too quickly and the two worlds did not match up perfectly, but I think that may have been a result of having 2 competing "authors" of the story. It did a great job of creating a child-like atmosphere by playing with the rules of traditional storytelling. The violence was also quite beautiful in its own way, even if it was the result of flawed, suicidal anger. Everybody just needs to calm down. I guess when a movie chooses to be this flashy, it has certain expectations, but as a 2 hour experience, I thought it was great. Just relax and watch the most beautiful movie of the last 10 years and enjoy yourself.

Posted by: liz at September 28, 2008 4:58 PM