free counter with statistics Factotum | Pajiba - Scathing Reviews for Bitchy People

factotum.jpg
Because He Eats Typewriter Ribbons

Factotum / Dustin Rowles

Film Reviews | August 22, 2006 | Comments (23)


There are quite a few folks who go through failed experimental stages in college. Some people mess around with drugs, some flirt with same-sex activities, and others — especially those who take a lot of English lit — read a lot of the Beats. I fell into that latter category, but I sort of wished I’d tripped on the Ecstasy instead. I know it’s damn near sacrilege for a person who professes intelligence to dump on the Beats, but — like abstract art, L.A., or comic books — the appeal is lost on me. I appreciated the counterculture sentiment and all, but — though my prose may not always suggest it — I have a soft spot in my heart for grammar. And syntax. And appropriate punctuation. And making some goddamn sense in general.

All of which is why I couldn’t make heads or tails of Kerouac, Ginsberg, and Charles Bukowski (I know … I know … though he wasn’t technically a member of the Beats, his writing style suggested otherwise). But I read it anyway. ‘Cause that’s what the “cool” kids did in college. Well, that and the Ecstasy, but, you know, I got the allergies. Granted, I do love Bukowski’s Bar in Boston, though I admit to feeling a bit like a poseur walking in — I always do in the presence of equal amounts of body art and detached irony.

Anyway, Factotum is about Charles Bukowksi. Sort of. It’s actually about a guy named Hank Chinaski, who was the fictional alter-ego of Bukowski, played by Mickey Rourke in Barfly and by Matt Dillon here. But, really, Chinaski is just Bukowski — ask anyone. I’m not exactly sure what I think of Dillon as Bukowski; in the film, he looks a little bit like how I feel when I walk into Bukowski’s Bar— uncomfortable with the prospect of someone finding him out. Then again, it’s hard to gain any perspective when all you can think about is the fact that the guy who thinks “retards” are “goofy bastards” is channeling some weird, under-rasped Christian Slater with greasy hair and thrift-store clothes and saying things like, “Jan was an excellent fuck. She had a tight pussy. And she took it like it was a knife that was killing her.” Jan, it almost goes without saying, is played by Lili Taylor.

So, Chinaski drinks. He procures the occasional job, which he never manages to hang on to because he usually leaves mid-shift to hit the local tavern. He goes to the horse races. He drinks, and he occasionally pukes. He schtups and then beats Jan every once in a while, because it’s something to do, I guess. He gets crabs and covers his crotch in gauze. And he says a lot of idiotic shit that the cool kids are supposed to eat up, like “a poem is a barbershop filled with drunks” or “I decided to clean up the apartment. I thought, I must be turning into a fag.” And for all I know, all the cool kids are just like me, pretending to dig this nonsense — suggesting that the entire subculture is just an illusion built on a faux-hipster premise. Like the inexplicable resurgence of wrist bands.

But mostly Factotum is just a lot of nothing, revealed at the slowest pace imaginable. My God, it’s tedious. An entire 15 minutes, for instance, is devoted to Chinaski’s efforts to pick up a check for the one day he managed to work at a newspaper. “All I want to do is get my check and get drunk,” he says. “That might not sound noble, but it’s my choice.” There is no discernible plot; Chinaski just meanders from point to point, carrying a drink with him along the way. “It’s amazing how hard we hang on to our misery,” he says. Sadly, Factotum gives us nothing else to hang on to.

Dustin Rowles is the publisher of Pajiba. He lives in a blue house with his wife in a hippie colony/college town in upstate New York. You may email him, or leave a comment below.


Nobody Puts Pajiba in a Corner | Snakes on a Plane



Comments

I absolutely adore Ham On Rye. The rest I could do without.

But Bukowski did do all that grammar and punctuation and making sense shit. He just never grasped that stories should have structure, and maybe even a point.

Posted by: Deniz at August 22, 2006 12:59 PM

Oh, also his poetry. His shit works best when it's short enough that it doesn't matter that it's going nowhere.

Posted by: Deniz at August 22, 2006 1:00 PM

You couldn't make heads nor tails of it because it's not good. Don't beat yourself up.

Posted by: Ashley at August 22, 2006 1:48 PM

Dillion? As Bukowski? I can't decide if it's a step up or down from Mickey Rourke's Tragic Barfly Massacre.

I don't understand why nobody is interested in casting Nick Nolte as Bukowski! C'mon! It's Nolte! He's halfway there already!

Posted by: SOME_KINDA_BUNNY at August 22, 2006 1:53 PM

the reason those lines you quoted were so stupid is beacuse they weren't bukowski; they were some dork with a dorky name trying to write like buk. Also, Dillon was a terrible chinaski. We went to the premiere at LACMA and didn't even stay for the Q & A after because it was so obvious the guy had no clue what makes the character so interesting, or at least human. In the book, the part where he 'beats' Jan, it comes after Buk makes it clear that it's coming from a sense of helplessness and even a real kind of love. In the movie that is just not there.

Also, no more voiceovers, please. If you can't make an interesting movie from intersting books without putting the whole book in in post, then don't make the damn movie.

Barfly was so much a better movie. Rourke actually kind of captured the mix of crazy/naive pretty well, I thought. Rent that instead.

Posted by: Ryan at August 22, 2006 2:47 PM

Bukowski = Overrated. Actually most of the 'Beat' style is only appreciated by Po-mo Mo-fos with far more angst then sense.

Posted by: Adam C at August 22, 2006 3:47 PM

My favorite poem ever is For Jane: with all the love I had, which is not enough.
And I will love Bukowski forever, but movies made from his stuff are just not all that great. I love Where the Buffalo Roam but I know it sucks. I love Barfly and I know it's not the best (not the worst either) And I'll see this and probably love it too.

Posted by: Liz at August 22, 2006 4:38 PM

I'm only 18, so Bukowski won't mean anything to me until I hit my pretentious, artsy college phase (Yay.)

Posted by: Nicki B at August 22, 2006 5:42 PM

I shouldn't nitpick, but...

I don't believe Bukowski should be lumped in with the Beats. First of all, he was never a part of the east coast intelligensia in general, or Kerouac's small circle of friends who comprised the "Beats" proper, and while he is NOW viewed as a counter-culture figure, Bukowski, as far as I could tell, didn't really give a shit about those sorts of trends. Yes, his life certainly ran counter to the way "civilized" culture behaved, but his lifestyle and affixed philosophy (if he even had a philosophy) wasn't the same as those of Kerouac, Ginsberg, et al.

Also, Bukowski was never inspired by the American Transcendentalism movement of the early 19th century (as many of the so-called Beat Writers were), and so his work was never heavily informed by a real spirituality (in the traditional sense) that transcended the physical. Bukowski seemed to me to always be very much grounded in the physical, especially his beloved city of Los Angeles. There's certainly nothing transcendent about drinking oneself silly every day and night and slapping the shit outta yr woman, but that's just my opinion.

Also, to commentator Liz - it should be noted that Where The Buffalo Roam was essentially a biographical film about Hunter S. Thompson, not Charles Bukowski.

Anyways, Matt Dillon as Bukowski doesn't excite me in the least. An example, I would say, of casting who is "hot in Hollywood" rather than who is the right actor for the job. I rather enjoyed Barfly, which is definitely worth a rental, and I certainly suggest checking out the recent documentary, Bukowski: Born Into This, which is a rather compelling examination of the man's life. Two films that are undoubtedly better than this one.

Posted by: Hank Mohaski at August 22, 2006 7:17 PM

It would have been better to do a movie about Bukowski's Hollywood, which was a fun random book about how Barfly got made. Which sucked in the end
(or so I heard). I guess aside from Bukowski's docu-film Born Into This, there really is no point in making films about him or characters that are based on him. Sort of like Hunter S. Thompson...although Fear and Loathing was pretty RAD! And I never really thought of Bukowski as a Beat poet or writer, seems he came into the whole writing thing later than that when he was way older than everyone else...just a thought...

Posted by: Gina at August 22, 2006 8:32 PM

I have to say that Charles Bukowski the poet has gotten me through so many bad periods over the years by his shining humanity and his harsh and real honesty that I am forever grateful to his work and his life. So much poetry is abstracted from genuine experience and lifted up into swirling images where old Charles always gave it to you straight. There's alot to be said for that.

Posted by: d henry at August 22, 2006 8:41 PM

Bixby says:
Attention Hollywood! The line forms behind Factotum and Matt Dillon for this year's Award Honors!
Mr. Dillon recalls the youthful exuberance of Burt Lancaster in "Come Back Little Sheba"
Ms Lili Taylor brings to mind the outrageous and vivacious energy of her namesake Elizabeth Taylor! Viva La Taylors!
If Mr. Bukowski's outstanding script doesn't win for this one there is no justice in the business! Bravo Mr. Bukowski, and here's a special shoutout to Mr. Dillon who makes Ray Milland's Lost Weekend seem like a tiptoe through the tulips compared to this new modern classic. To the Head of the Class Mr. Bukowski and troupe!

Posted by: Bixby at August 22, 2006 8:51 PM

Bukowski may be overrated, but Bukowski's Bar in Boston is outstanding, though I prefer the Cambridge one - smaller crowds, quieter, less pretense.

Honestly, Matt Dillon as anything holds almost no interest to me.

Posted by: TK at August 23, 2006 12:23 PM

Wow - I'm probably showing my age, but I think Matt Dillon is one of the most handsome actors ever to have graced the screen. Dark and brooding - just gorgeous. He is far more compelling to me than Orlando Bloom and his ilk.

I don't think he's a gifted actor, but I don't think he's terrible or anything and I think he, generally, knows his limitations and sticks with them. I respect that.

Posted by: Samantha T at August 23, 2006 1:32 PM

I'm finally realizing that other people agree with me on the Beats. While I do enjoy myself some Ginsberg, I find Kerouac to be insufferable - not only because of his writing style but also because of his over-wrought mysogyny. Like you, I thought I should be reading the Beats in college and tried On the Road three times before figuring it wasn't worth my time. Thank God there are others out there who feel the same way.

Posted by: lindsay lu at August 23, 2006 8:50 PM

Having met Bukowski and Allan Ginsgerg, (sp)? , I can say I liked Bukowski better. At least he didn't try to fuck me in the ass. I met Bukowski on a street in San Pedro where he said he was waiting to meet Sean Penn. Go figure.
After having passed a few sentences with Bukowski, we found that we were both victims of drunken and repeated beatings administered by our respective fathers. (Don't ask).
We talked about the sadness and rage this had caused in us, and suddenly I got it. I was a quiet fan and devotee forever after.
Amazingly, he wasn't drunk @ the time of this chance meeting and called over his "wife" and introduced me, joyfully proclaiming to her that "this guys' father beat him too". She seemed weary of this behaviour and not particularly impressed by our bond of trauma and lifelong struggle to get free of the emotional scarring. Bitches...they're all alike.
I crossed paths with Ginsburg (sp)? in the downtown Baltimore Hilton, during the winter of 1972. Elvis was in town on one of his fateful, pathetic final tours, and I had gone down to the lobby, wrecked on Red Leb Hash, looking for candy.
I looked up from the counter after buying God knows how much sugar, and here Ginsboig (sp)? comes, riding down the escalator to the cavern of lobby space, grinning beatifically.
I marched right up to him and asked if he was Allan Gainsborough (sp)? and he assured me that I was correct, still grinning to BEAT the band. Anyway I invited him up to my room for a puff and introduced him to my roommate at the time, an olive-skinned blond woman cheer leader from St. Louis, wrapped up provocatively in the gooey sheets.
The guy starts putting the make on me and I kindly but respectfully showed Ganzberle (sp)? out. I didn't know he was gay....I hadn't read anything he had written, and wanted to ask him about Cassidy and Kerouac. So I can tell you with assurance that Bukowski and the Beats had very little in common except red wine.

Posted by: Transformedia at August 24, 2006 1:24 AM

according to the biography Locked in the Arms of a Crazy Life by Howard Sounes, Buk may or may not have fucked a male friend in the ass after a night of drinking. So, you know, they probably have that in common, too.

Posted by: Ryan at August 24, 2006 3:22 PM

"Elvis was in town on one of his fateful, pathetic final tours, and I had gone down to the lobby, wrecked on Red Leb Hash, looking for candy."

Somebody's been reading a bit *too* much of the Beats.

Posted by: Samantha T at August 24, 2006 5:51 PM

"Jan, it almost goes without saying, is played by Lili Taylor."

I think this may be the best line I've ever seen on Pajiba.

Posted by: Eep at August 26, 2006 12:28 PM

The problem with movies about Kerouac, Bukowski, Burroughs, or Hemingway is that someone will review them. And usually the reviewers write in some not-insightful, tic-filled approximation of the writer's style and then I have to scoop my eyes out with a teaspoon. I was so happy that you didn't try to be Bukowski. And then I read the comments. *splorch*

Posted by: Kate at August 28, 2006 7:29 PM

if i remember correctly, there was a part in 'Hollywood' where Bukowski specifically mentions how ridiculous it was that they wanted to have some young handsome star to play him.

Posted by: lefty at August 29, 2006 2:24 PM

Adrienne Shelley was murdered last month in Manhattan. Thankfully her new film (starring the criminally-unappreciated Nathan Fillion)is finished and will hopefully get widespread release soon. Everyone loves a hot murdered white woman, right?

Posted by: chris at November 9, 2006 5:42 PM

I think "the beats" are overrated and they didn't write for themselves. they wrote for fame, like nicholas sparks and stephen king. true writers are those who write for themselves and bukowski was that. so was rimbaud, celine, and few others.

Posted by: gus at May 27, 2007 5:28 PM