enchanted2sm.jpg

Poisoned Apples in the Big Apple

Enchanted / Agent Bedhead

Film Reviews | December 15, 2007 | Comments (63)


Enchanted is a pleasant surprise of a children’s film that carries the so-called spirit of the season. Directed by Kevin Lima (Tarzan, 102 Dalmations), the film uses a clever script penned by Bill Kelly (Blast from the Past) that edges into social commentary. Enchanted harbors a deconstructionist attitude that playfully engages in some reversal of gender roles and indulges in a self-parody of the Disney genre itself.

The film’s first 12 minutes are animated in the classic hand-drawn, 2-D old school Disney fashion. The animated heroine, Gisele (Amy Adams), strongly resembles Belle from Beauty and the Beast. Like all of the animated Disney heroines, Gisele has the ability to communicate with animals. Gisele lives in Andalasia and is a typical Disney princess with no visible traits other than beauty and vainglorious hope that her Prince Charming is out there somewhere. Prince Edward (James Marsden) hears her singing one day and happens to catch her after she falls from a tree. This is, of course, love at first sight, and the two decide to marry on the next day. However, the evil Queen Narissa (Susan Sarandon) wants to rule the kingdom alone, so she tosses Gisele and her fucking hoop skirt down the magic well. The Queen’s intentions are for Gisele to arrive in a place where “there are no happy endings.”

At the bottom of the well, the naive Gisele follows a manhole that leads to the (Disneyfied) Times Square in live-action Manhattan. The endearing Amy Adams embodies her formerly-animated character with fluttering grace as she struggles to avoid vehicles that are much smaller than her dress. The displaced would-be Princess ends up rain-soaked and knocking on the castle door of a billboard. Then, the disenchanted Robert Philip (Patrick “Dr. McDreamy” Dempsey) notices Gisele’s plight. As a divorce lawyer that specializes in dissolving mythical “happily ever after” unions, Robert mistakes Gisele for an errant mental patient. McJaded’s daughter, 6-year-old Morgan (Rachel Covey), persuades Robert to let Gisele sleep on the couch, and, naturally, Robert’s girlfriend, Nancy (the underused Idina Menzel), assumes the worst when she discovers Gisele’s presence. Meanwhile, Prince Edward dives into the magic well to rescue his bride. Edward is followed by his henchman, Nathaniel (Timothy Spall), and a chipmunk named Pip, who does most of the dirty work of rescuing the hopeful Princess. Throughout the film, various sugar-encrusted Disney allusions appear, including poisoned apples, midnight transformations, magic mirrors, glass slippers, and a restaurant called Bella Notte (Lady and the Tramp). Even the film’s fleeting and ephemeral Narrator (Julie Andrews) reminds the audience that, ultimately, this is a fairy-tale story. These reminders ground the film in a way that pays homage to the Disney catalog while gently batting it around.

While many characters appear throughout the story, the film’s obvious focus is on actress Amy Adams as the leading lady. Her unaffected Gisele interacts marvelously with the big city in a way that makes this an enthralling duo of sorts. The filmmakers do a fabulous job of presenting a visitor’s perspective of Manhattan by contrasting the city’s street-level grittiness with the splendor of Central Park. As the film goes on, Gisele becomes accustomed to the strangeness of reality, and she becomes far less annoying as she gradually begins to develop emotions other than her ubiquitous cheeriness. The CGI effects are minimal and primarily used to provide Giselle with animal helpers. However, the final act of the film descends into computer-generated madness once the Queen’s inevitable arrival in Manhattan. Younger children may be frightened of the Queen’s ghastly appearance in these final scenes, and parents should also be aware of some mild sexual innuendo involving Prince Edward and a vibrating bed. Speaking of the Prince, James Marsden carries one hell of a presence and impeccable comic timing. His Prince, who speaks without a trace of irony, is so dim that it would take the entire Manhattan power supply to light his bulb. As the single father and romantic rival, McDreamballs does OK, but his character doesn’t require much other than acting like a jaded doorstand. Basically, he’s there to row the boat and learn from Gisele as she blossoms into her own personality.

In comparison to the Disney catalog of Princesses, mermaids, and the like, Giselle is something of a renegade in her self-awareness.Throughout the latter half of the film, her vacuous disposition lessens as she realizes her corporeal body. When Gisele experiences anger for the first time, she realizes her physicality, and through a subtle move by the filmmakers, Gisele happens to notice that McWhatshisname’s chest hair is ever-so-slightly visible at the top of his bathrobe. Thus, the typical Disney Princess achieves the ironic self-awareness often associated with postmodernist pieces of art. While these developments are unusual in the context of a Disney story, this film is hardly revolutionary in its animated deconstruction of a preexisting hierarchy. After all, Shrek and The Incredibles use extensive meta references (e.g. pop culture gags) as a concession to the parents who have to sit through these films. The problem with all this postmodernist bullshit is that, well, postmodernism is pretty much dead as a school of thought, and that all these groundbreaking revelations are pretty much old news. Enchanted may appear unorthodox in comparison to what we expect from Disney films, but I still think that it could have gone further. Perhaps the male characters could have moved past being either complete idiots or sheepishly jaded, and the jilted and jealous pre-existing girlfriend character is a well-worn cliché that should be retired. Still, Enchanted provides a slightly different version of “happily ever after” than we’re used to, and it provides the happy ending that children in the audience need to feel, well, satisfied. And as we all know, satisfied children drag their parents back to the movies for the next Disney film. Otherwise, Disney would have pressed the self-destruction button as far as its vast array of Princesses are concerned. So, in the end, the formulaic happy ending wins and Disney remains Disney. Still, Enchanted displays just enough cunning self-awareness within the Disney genre to make the film work as a successful family film.

Agent Bedhead (a.k.a. “Kimberly”) lives in Tulsa, Oklahoma. She can found destroying her prom dress at agentbedhead.com.


Pajiba Love 12/13/07 | I Am Legend



Comments

I'm glad to hear it's not terrible, I have been curious about this one for a while!

Posted by: Jenny at November 22, 2007 4:29 PM

I admit this looks cute, and I have hope for Susan Sarandon in most cases. I think I may have to make this a double feature with "August Rush".

Posted by: Elizebeth at November 22, 2007 4:43 PM

James Marsden. I still can't see him on screen without hearing a voice in my head saying "Go to the boy"...

Posted by: general rhubarb at November 22, 2007 4:51 PM

Patrick "McDouchebag" Dempsey? Nah, I don't think so, in fact let me shoot a nice sticky viscous wad of hate with a cup of poo chaser at this.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at November 22, 2007 5:19 PM

I took my 5 & 8 year old daughters to see this yesterday. We loved it. It was clever, funny and sweet.

Amy Adams steals the show. I have been a huge fan since Junebug. I will watch anything she will do!

Posted by: Sharon at November 22, 2007 5:39 PM

I call bullshit. Can't put my finger on it. "So she tosses Gisele and her fucking hoop skirt down the magic well." Nicely done, "Kimberly"

Posted by: carla at November 22, 2007 5:58 PM

I will confess that I cannot wait to see this. My usually-magic-stealing flatmate (she's so good at destroying the joy in everything that I had to force her to watch The Princess Bride without me under strict instruction that if she found even one tiny nit-pick I did not want to hear it - luckily she has taste and loved it) leaned over to me in the Cinema after seeing the trailer, her eyes wide and shining to whisper "Alex, if you don't come with me to this I may have to hurt you".

Magic! Fairytales! James Marsden! McDreamy (bite me)! Susan Sarandon! A Chipmunk!

Everything a girl could ask for. It may actually be enough to drag me near a movie theatre within the month of December. That hasn't happened since I was five.

Posted by: Alex the Odd at November 22, 2007 6:23 PM

"...Magic! Fairytales! James Marsden! McDreamy (bite me)! ..."


Even though I can't quite put my finger on it, I think that was meant for me...

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at November 22, 2007 6:37 PM

I had planned to see this with our 4 and 8 year old daughters, even if it ran afoul of Pajiba et al. I have to admit I was worried when I saw the title of this review, but now I can continue to look forward to a day at the movies with my family and not dread the movie to be seen. (Yes, I am looking at YOU, Nancy Drew!!)

Posted by: mswas at November 22, 2007 7:41 PM

My inner child is very happy with this review. Yay!

Posted by: KatyBelle at November 22, 2007 9:35 PM

Even though I've seen the trailer for this a million times, which means I've seen James Marsden IN the trailer a million times, while reading this I still thought it said James MARSTERS, not James Marsden, and my heart did a brief little dance.

Spike + Disney I'd go see.

Cyclops + Disney I'll be sure to skip.

Good review, regardless.

Posted by: Brett at November 22, 2007 9:40 PM

My friends in college and I all want to see it, and since it receives the Pajiba seal of approval then it must be worth my buck.

Posted by: Ben at November 22, 2007 9:59 PM

I feel like I'm the only person in the world who constantly confuses Amy Adams and Isla Fischer. Do any other fellow Pajibans make this mistake?

Posted by: Alex at November 22, 2007 10:09 PM

Oddly enough, Alex, I was just thinking about that the other day. Hmm. I had to remind myself that Isla Fischer wasn't the girl in Junebug and The Office. Was she? Dammit.

Also, I wish I went to the movies so I could see this. It looks adorable.

Posted by: Claire at November 22, 2007 10:35 PM

Queen's inevitable arrives in Manhattan.

WTF? Did you mean once the Queen inevitably arrives in Manhattan?

Posted by: joe cool at November 22, 2007 10:37 PM

Brett:

Let Hairspray be your litmus test for James Marsden, not the X-Men series.

Posted by: Colin at November 22, 2007 11:18 PM

Wow, joe cool. You are so...cool, for picking up on what was an understandable grammatical error. What would we do without you?

Good review, btw. I'd been a little hesitant to go see it, but now I think I'll give it a try.

Posted by: oh please at November 23, 2007 1:24 AM

Patrick Dempsey...meh

James Marsden...Oh I'm SO there!

Except it doesn't open here till boxing day. Apparently, even with the wonders of modern technology, it still takes six weeks to get a movie to Australia, unless there is a ridiculous amount of hype surrounding it.

Bah.

Posted by: rach at November 23, 2007 1:44 AM

Barbado Slim,

unless you're wearing latex gloves, stop trying to put your fingers on everything! It's unsanitary. My wife giggles like a truculent schoolgirl every time she sees the prince get run over by the bicyclists in the trailer, so we'll probably catch a matinee at some point in the near future. Thanks for the good review, A. bedhead!

Posted by: Capn Gravy at November 23, 2007 2:37 AM

I feel like I'm the only person in the world who constantly confuses Amy Adams and Isla Fischer. Do any other fellow Pajibans make this mistake

Me too! I'm just glad to know I'm not alone. I seriously thought they were one person and I was just getting her name wrong repeatedly until recently. I'm a little slow. Still can't tell them apart well, though.

And where the hell is the review of "The Mist?" That's the only one that I'm really excited about this week.

Posted by: AnnArrogance at November 23, 2007 3:05 AM

I enjoyed this movie, as nervous as I was going to see it by myself, since no one wanted to go. Anyway, it might be a while before I see it again, but I still had fun. Here's some random trivia, too! During the scene where McLead and Amy Adams are in his office and she's staring at the fish tank, the muzak is playing "Part of Your World," but you have to listen carefully. Also, in the same scene, his assistant is played by Jodi Benson, aka the voice of Ariel. Paige O'Hara (the voice of Belle) is somewhere in the movie as well. Also, the song they play during the ball, after announcing the King's Waltz, is not a waltz at all.

Posted by: Rowen at November 23, 2007 8:19 AM

"I feel like I'm the only person in the world who constantly confuses Amy Adams and Isla Fischer. Do any other fellow Pajibans make this mistake"


ME TOO, I know they dont even look so much alike but I just cant tell them apart, especially know that the Fisher gave birth. they are like my female version of the Stephen Dorff/Christian Slater. Alex, AnnArrogance thank you, I dont feel so alone anymore, I was gonna commit suicide, you stopped me just in time.

Posted by: rio at November 23, 2007 8:40 AM

I really liked this review -- it actually made me want to see a movie that I previously had no desire to see, which is cool.

Just one thing: Can we please get past the casual equation of "ironic self-awareness" or anything that "deconstructs" something (or simply begins with the prefix "meta-") with postmodernism? Yes, this is the way the term is most often used and I usually just ignore it in other media outlets, but I think the level of discourse on Pajiba is sophisticated enough that it can be pointed out. Irony and metafiction are two (among many) features of postmodern fiction, which is in turn only a small part of the larger artistic and philosophical movement called postmodernism. Though a sense of ironic awareness and self-exposure of the conventions of one's genre are a feature of much art from the postmodern period, they have been around forever -- look at Chaucer, or Cervantes, or Sterne. Or, hell, Aristophanes and Seneca. There is barely any necessary connection between these features and postmodernism except a general cultural trend of the late 20th century, and plenty of books and films have been and continue to be made that ironically undercut themselves (or create metafictional awareness of their own process of composition) that are not postmodernist in any sense but this. So, although we may be weary of finding that yet another "deconstructive" film has been made, it is wrong as well as somewhat lazy to portray this weariness as the reason for postmodernism being putatively "dead as a school of thought." If postmodernism's philosophical moment has passed -- and it is a matter of some debate whether it has or not -- it isn't because we have seen too many retreads of "Adaptation".

So, sorry for ranting at y'all, and I know that this was not at all the main point of the review, but I think we can stop using this huge and important concept to explain something relatively limited? It's like killing flies with a chainsaw -- unnecessary, and you might end up damaging the furniture.

Posted by: BabyTyrone at November 23, 2007 9:17 AM

Yup, what Tyrone said.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at November 23, 2007 9:28 AM

I'm glad James Marsden got cast in this. He's a perfect Ken doll.

I'll see it because I get very escapist when it comes to Disney. To bad I could never be one of the princesses, self awareness, while great for sarcastic monologue, is not conducive to maintaining a vapid, two dimensional, damsel persona.

Posted by: Scarlett at November 23, 2007 9:49 AM

There's a fine line between entertainment and education. Today's movies inflict their brand of eductaion in hopes of entertaining the movie going public. Fuck Enchanted!!!

Posted by: Pookie at November 23, 2007 10:22 AM

I figured this could have gone either way and I'm glad it turned out as charming as it sounds it did (though, like Carla, I sense something slightly off in the tenor of this review). Still, when considering the princess learning to deal with the physicality of her body I couldn't help but wonder how she would deal with the more unpleasant bodily processes that physical beings take for granted but that a cartoon princess would go insane when faced with them.

Maybe that can be the Troma version of this film.

Posted by: Armando at November 23, 2007 10:54 AM

Armando and Carla, I found it a bit off myself...

Posted by: b at November 23, 2007 11:22 AM

BabyTyrone, please, postmodernism is a living breathing thing. It is an idea, a thought if you will. Man has constantly sought out vehicles to express his thoughts on a singular entity. Deconstruct is the process of getting to the essence of a thought or idea. Adaptation is used by the lazy and is nothing more than theft. The fact that you mentioned Aristophanes and Seneca only tells me that you don't fully understand the postmodern dogma that has infected our Universities.

Posted by: Pookie at November 23, 2007 12:08 PM

Postmodernism. Meta. Deconstructs. What the hell are you people talking about?


I hate Disney on principle. It will take a lot to make me watch any of their fairy tales. Even as a kid I hate Cinderella, I thought she was an idiot running around in glass shoes (her foot would have been maimed if they'd broken). Not to mention the whole "I'll sit here like a moron until some guy I've never met comes and rescues me". *sigh*

Posted by: joker at November 23, 2007 12:08 PM

Just because it bothered me too while reading: I don't think it was necessary to throw a simplified notion of postmodernism into the review, just for the heck of it. (Not that I'm a big fan)

Posted by: tpring at November 23, 2007 12:56 PM

In general, I do agree that the majority of Disney fare is permeated with the helpless damsel in distress motif; however, I need to point out that in Beauty and the Beast, Belle was an intelligent heroine. She was the one who saved the day. I could give examples, but I don't have the time. Just don't disrespect Beauty and the Beast. It's such a cherished movie of mine, and I would hate to have it's image tainted here on Pajibaland. I'll have to take this conversation outside if people start talkin' trash 'bout that movie.

On a more related note, I really enjoyed this review and am happy that the movie received a nice one at that. My little sister has been begging me to take her to see this when I visit for Christmas, and I shall kindly oblige her wishes since it seems this movie will be fun for the both of us.

Posted by: Gigi Worthington at November 23, 2007 1:31 PM

BabyTyrone, please, postmodernism is a living breathing thing. It is an idea, a thought if you will. Man has constantly sought out vehicles to express his thoughts on a singular entity.

Pookie, I entirely agree with you. What did I write that made you think i disagree with this statement? All I said was that it is a matter of some debate whether postmodernism's philosophical moment has passed. But if you think it is a living idea and a means of expression, then why would you call it a "dogma that has infected our Universities?" Dogma is, by definition, not a living, breathing thing.

And I do take issue with: Deconstruct is the process of getting to the essence of a thought or idea. That's just another lazy definition. Deconstruction is a philosophical/literary process that is a whole lot more involved than this. But I don't want to hijack this into a forum for the discussion of the more arcane vagaries of philosophy. Check out this guy, jamesfaulconer.byu.edu/deconstr.htm , who has a good handle on it.

And finally, just to clear it up:
Adaptation is used by the lazy and is nothing more than theft. I was referring to the Charlie Kaufmann movie "Adaptation." You obviously have some axes to grind, but I wasn't trying to tread on those particlar toes (to blthely mix a metaphor.)

Posted by: BabyTyrone at November 23, 2007 1:55 PM

I agree with you Gigi Worthington with the damsel motif. Society is very scornfull of pimps, but Disney protray pimps in a more humane light. In a disney movie the damsel/hoe is always in distress and the Knight/pimp is always there to provide much needed help. The motif that you speak of has been a disney mainstay since it began it's foray into the movie making business.

Posted by: Pookie at November 23, 2007 2:17 PM

Gigi Are you sure you're not Robin McKinley in disguise? :-)

BabyTyrone don't feed the troll. Vermillion can tell you all about how exhausting it is to argue with Pookie. But I was quite pleased to have a handy summary of postmoderism, even if it did all go over my head.

I'm glad to hear this is worth watching as I wasn't that impressed with the trailer, though the clothes out of the curtains was quite funny. Does that mean they had WWII in fairly land too?

Posted by: Chris D at November 23, 2007 2:20 PM

Okay...I would like to agree with Gigi but not with Pookie. Some disney princesses, especially the early Snow White/Cinderella/Sleeping Beauty were pretty helpless damsels. But Jasmine, Mulan, Belle, and Pocahontas all had distinct viewpoints that would often clash with the male lead. And they by and large took care of themselves. How can we forget quick-thinking Jasmine pretending that Jafir's wish had been granted to gain time and trust? Screw classic literature lets deconstruct Disney (not deconstructionism though - I'm not getting in on that thread)
I don't know what any of that has to do with pimps though Pookie.

Posted by: Tiki at November 23, 2007 2:30 PM

If you are looking for an animated Disney female who's smart, self-sufficient, feminine (meaning no overcompensating with 'tude or butchiness), and athletic look no further than Kim Possible.

Pepper Ann was also good.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at November 23, 2007 2:37 PM

BabyTyrone, thank you for responding to some made up shit that I happily pulled out of my ass. I was sitting here at work in my dead end job bored to tears. And I saw your long comment about the review of enchanted and thought, here's a pompous ass who takes himself way to serious.

Posted by: Pookie at November 23, 2007 3:02 PM

Chris D, you are one of the main reasons why Clinton couldn't get away with getting a blowjob. You would have told everyone.

Posted by: Pookie at November 23, 2007 3:13 PM

I went and saw this yesterday and thought it was wonderful. It's funny and sweet. Amy Adams has excellent comic timing as does James Marsden. Patrick Dempsey is the straight man. It's kind of a hyper, comedic, ridiculous movie and you need a person in it who is "normal" and boring to balance the silliness.

I came out of it smiling and just feeling happy. Beside that, not all Disney princesses or most Disney princesses are damsels in distress. Like Tiki said, Jasmine, Mulan, Belle and Pocahontas all had minds of their own and didn't need to be "saved". Now little girls have Giselle to look up to who went from being silly and vapid to being self-aware and thoughtful.

Posted by: Alicia at November 23, 2007 6:24 PM

Just one question before I begin: How did we get to pimps?

Chris D.: I must live in a very odd and tiny box because I had to initially do some research on Robin McKinley. However, after doing my brief research, I realized that I need to read her novels. I think in another life I would be doing exactly what she does.

Tiki: I am so happy you brought up the other characters. I was thinking of listing those as well. I agree that the more modern Disney princess/heroine is a quick-thinking, do-it-herself gal. I guess I was thinking of the classic Disney princess (Snow White, Sleeping Beauty, etc.) because Enchanted seems to deconstruct (not in the philosophical sense) those archetypes. In any case, I am happy that someone else acknowledges that Disney is at least trying to move in a more progressive manner (it still has a way to go).

I hope everyone had an excellent Thanksgiving. If you don't live in the states, I hope you had an excellent Thursday while America gorged itself on food, alcohol, and football(which really isn't too different from any other day).

Posted by: Gigi Worthington at November 23, 2007 8:09 PM

Um, there is something that is really irking me (no, not Pookie for once). Quite a few comments refer to the "Disney Princesses" and their relative damselness. I think you are giving Disney too much credit.

First off, Snow White, Sleeping Beauty and Cinderella existed in all their un-PC weak-kneed glory long before Disney got their hands on them. The stories had these females established as prizes or simpletons for some time now. The House of Mouse only grabbed them up and made their cash off of them. It didn't hurt that the films were released during a time where gender relations weren't as progressed as they are now.

The original Princesses (Ariel, Mulan, etc.) showed a more advanced understanding of the heroine concept. They became much more capable of protecting themselves and others, without losing those feminine attributes they enjoyed. Belle seemed to be a transition character in a way: she was from a established fairy tale, but she showed a more modern mentality and wasn't nearly as passive as her predecessors. Still, that could be seen as a necessary change reflecting the times than a conscious attempt at character evolution.

So please, don't let Disney completely off the hook, but don't place the blame squarely on their shoulders.

Posted by: Vermillion at November 23, 2007 9:32 PM

Oh, Vermillion, you and your complex shades of grey; I want to love and hate in black and white, damn it!

I'm sure there's no easy solution to the Middle East either, right Mr. Complicated?

Posted by: socalledonlycousins at November 23, 2007 9:40 PM

Ariel is not an original princess, Vermillion. The "Little Mermaid" is a Hans Christian Anderson story-- yet another that Disney butchered, almost as badly as they did the Hunchback.

As well, since Disney attempted to give these fairytales life beyond the morals, social values, and warnings these tales were originally meant to impart, I would say the lack of dimension they gave to the characters did, in fact, result in weaker and more pathetic female archetypes.

At the same time, who freaking cares? What weak-minded children were brainwashed into helplessness by Snow White? None that I know of. I've seen much worse from the modern role-models that little girls are spoon-fed. I can't stand little girls-- the snotty attitudes and narcissism rampant in modern little girl attitudes is horrifying. These little brats grow up to be divas who need to have the snot slapped out of them and could benefit from a dose of modesty, humility, and self-sacrifice. And THESE are the ones raised on Belle, Ariel, and Mulan.
Hey, women. Despite what various make-up adverts would have you believe, not every woman is a queen. We're not all princesses and we don't deserve to be treated like princesses. Get /over/ yourselves and quit living and acting like you're the center of the universe.

Sorry for the tangent. Had a bad day.

Posted by: amea_gari at November 24, 2007 1:08 AM

I took my nephews to see this, all boys, 9, 8, 6 and 5. They liked it, had some good laughs. It's just a feel good movie, and sometimes that's ok.

Posted by: Chiquis at November 24, 2007 2:30 AM

Amea_gari, you are the new voice of reason. Your insights into the female psyche are both impressive and on point. I think that other female posters on this website ( I won't mention any names) can learn from you.

Posted by: Pookie at November 24, 2007 9:21 AM

well, postmodernism is pretty much dead as a school of thought, and that all these groundbreaking revelations are pretty much old news
agent bedhead, what did postmodernism do to you to deserve that?

Posted by: bloodsugar at November 24, 2007 11:24 AM

Mulan isn't a Disney original, either...

Posted by: kayla at November 24, 2007 11:48 AM

Pookie, dear, you're transparent.

I wanted to say Mulan but I had an idea that, like Pocohantas, that was /allegedly/ based on 'history' rather than a preexisting fairytale.

Posted by: amea_gari at November 24, 2007 12:40 PM

Amea_Gari: I think the sense of entitlement that you are referring to is found not only in little girls but in little boys as well. While Disney may feed the machine a little, it is the culture and parents who really make these children into little brats. I have a much younger sister who adores her Disney princesses (especially Jasmine), and she is nowhere near being a brat or helpless girl because my dad has raised her to be something better than that. I think it unfair to say that Disney is to blame for it all (or even a large percentage) when there are some truly unfit parents in the world breeding little monsters. Obviously, I am not saying that Disney is perfect or that some animated princess should be the avatar of a strong female woman in a young girl's life. But, I do think that parents whom willingly delude their children into believing that they are entitled to everything are more responsible for the outcome (which I think coincides with what you were saying). Regarding entitled women, there is nothing worse than a woman or man who thinks the world should revolve around her or him; however, from my own experiences, it seems that generally people only focus inward, and it takes a very powerful situation to make a person change their perspective from inward to outward, which is tragic. In any case, I hope your day today is better than your last.

Vermillion: I love the fact that you bring up the original fairy tale. I bought a collection of original fairy tales a few years a go, and I was shocked by how gruesome they were. In Cinderella, the step sisters cut their feet off in order to fit into the glass slipper. In the Little Mermaid, the mermaid who has no name (aka Disney Ariel) kills herself. And how could anyone forget Blue Beard, the guy who kills his wives and then hangs them in a secret room. I know that Disney pretty much bastardizes any original story, but I think that sometimes they may have no other option. Could you imagine a Cinderella movie in which the step sisters mutilate their feet in order to fit into the glass slipper (cautionary tale of vanity)? I would have no problem seeing it, but I think some parents might which would greatly impact profits. However, I might be mistaken since most parents I know have no problem showing their 8 year olds the Lord of the Rings trilogy. In any case, the issue is really not that grave. Disney does what it needs to do in order to increase its profit margin. It's a corporation not extended family or even a valid babysitter even though some people might think it is. In the end, like you so accurately stated, it is neither good nor bad.

Posted by: Gigi Worthington at November 24, 2007 1:13 PM

Amea_gari, I had hope not to be so transparent. But I still do believe that you are very insightful.

Posted by: Pookie at November 24, 2007 1:21 PM

I don't have a problem with the princesses/heroines from the original movies. My problem is all the Disney Princess stuff that comes out Direct to DVD and plastered all over . . things. It's almost as bad as Hello Kitty. That's where I see the problem is. In most of the movies, I don't see a big deal being made over the fact that many of these girls are royalty, it's just who they are, and apart of the story. However, THEN the whole "all girls are princesses" bullshit comes flying around and suddenly all trace of intelligence and strength is lost as we get pretty girls singing, dancing and wearing pretty dresses. Just like many modern day females, except most modern day females can't sing, dance, and wouldn't know a good looking outfit if it ran over them.

Posted by: Rowen at November 24, 2007 4:22 PM

The Balls on this guy!

Posted by: Pookie at November 24, 2007 4:48 PM

Okay, until I read the Isla Fisher/Amy Adams comment, I didn't KNOW there was and Isla Fisher. I thought Amy Adams was both and the same...

Posted by: courtney at November 24, 2007 7:44 PM

The dress shaped curtain holes in the trailers were enough to get me to see this.

Posted by: Ken Hart at November 24, 2007 10:20 PM

re: looked like Belle....
I was actually trying to analyze some of the animation for prior Disney character influence... and I thought she looked a little bit Megara-ish (Hercules), more than anything else. Maybe a mix of the two. And for the record, I think that Idina Menzel's animation was Little Mermaidy.

Posted by: Nikki at November 25, 2007 1:13 AM

Was I the only one waiting and WAITING for Idina Menzel to burst out into song? One of the film's main running gags is the characters spontaneously lapsing into melody and they DON'T utilize the Broadway star of both RENT and Wicked?? Color me severely disappointed.

Posted by: Michele at November 25, 2007 12:11 PM

Was I the only one waiting and WAITING for Idina Menzel to burst out into song?

Word, Michele. Word.

I thought at the very least she should have burst into song at the end... and been horribly off key. Now THAT would have been funny.

The only thing that held the movie back was, surprisingly, Dempsey. He was so blah. I don't watch Grey's... is he always like that?

On another note, the 2D animation here was greatly improved and quite stunning. After seeing the upgrade here, I am super-excited about the upcoming "Frog Princess".

Posted by: ciji at November 25, 2007 5:53 PM

Wow, I didn't think it was possible to say that much about a film while saying almost nothing at all. I think the local newsrag does more insightful reviews.

Posted by: JoeBlu at November 25, 2007 8:27 PM

This is waaaaay late, but I had to join in on the Robin McKinley LOVE. I just reread Beauty a few weeks ago; it's very obvious that the Disney folks were highly influenced by her interpretation of the story. It's so beautifully nuanced. (No pun intended.)

Posted by: pinkcheese at November 26, 2007 10:30 AM

Sorry, didn't mean to yell. Someone else mentioned once how frustrating it is to see your mistakes after clicking the post button...I wholeheartedly agree. Grrr.

Posted by: pinkcheese at November 26, 2007 10:32 AM

Ditto on the Robin McKinley love... I stole Beauty from the Library when I was about 12... I went and saw this movie yesterday with my 3 year old and my 21 year old sister, and I think we all enjoyed it. I remember Amy Adams best as Leslie in Drop Dead Gorgeous ( in which she is the MOST hilarious character), and I really enjoyed her fluttery princess here.

Posted by: Aldogg at November 26, 2007 12:29 PM

I suspected I would love this movie, and I did. I adore Amy Adams, and I have a weakness for Disney princess flicks (especially Beauty and the Beast). I loved how Amy Adams used her hands ... she did the animated princess hands so perfectly. It was the perfect touch to capture that special Disney-princessness.

Posted by: Kristin at November 27, 2007 12:08 AM