web
counter
 

Jump Up My Ass, Lady

By Dustin Rowles | Posted Under Film Reviews | Comments (213)



2823_12967143385.jpg

Unctuous. That’s the only way I can describe Eat, Pray, Love. Unctuous. Characterized by affected, exaggerated, or insincere earnestness. I didn’t buy it. I didn’t read the source material, so I can’t speak to the book. But this Elizabeth Gilbert — the one in the movie — I don’t see how anyone can relate to that character. Putting aside the white privilege that Courtney ranted to eloquently about yesterday, there’s also the notion that anyone could buy into this fortune cookie bullshit. Gilbert is a shallow, self-indulgent, and arrogant woman. This person is not going on a journey of self-discovery, whatever the fuck that is. This person is abandoning her life. Instead of confronting her problems, instead of working through them, or processing whatever it is that makes her so inexplicably unhappy, she abandons them. And she abandons a husband who — at least as he’s characterized in the movie — is loving, charming, and more than adequate because she needs some more goddamn “me time.”

Don’t we all, sister? Get the fuck over it.

And for what? So she can find herself? Or so she can find a better man? It’s hard to tell from the movie, because this woman is as shallow, self-indulgent and arrogant at the end of the movie as she is in the beginning, only now (*spoilers*) she’s traded Billy Crudup for Javier Bardem. From an aesthetic point of view, maybe that’s a worthwhile swap. But the best I can gather from the film is that all she learned along her journey of self-discovery is that she can eat more pasta, speak better Italian, and meditate, which is to say: Spend more time with herself, because God knows why anyone else would want to spend time with her. She’s no better than the Julie Powell character in Julie and Julia: She finds herself by boring other people with her petty fucking problems, and shitting on anyone dumb enough to give a damn.

I don’t like these kind of people. The Oprah types, who have to tell you how great they are in order to convince you. That’s all that Eat, Pray, Love boils down to: A woman trying to convince you of how great she is so that maybe you’ll take a similar journey — literal or metaphorical — in which you try to convince everyone of how great you are. There’s a scene in Eat, Pray, Love that’s typical of this white, bourgeois bullshit, where Elizabeth sends an email to all of her American friends to guilt them into sending a poor family some money to buy a house as a birthday present to her. Noble? Perhaps, if it weren’t so motherfucking transparent that the gesture is less about helping out this family than it is about celebrating her goddamn selflessness. I know people like this — I suspect most of you know people like this. People who manage to work their good deeds into virtually every conversation, the same way that gym obsessed person will work his morning work-out routine into all of his conversations. Like we’re the goddamn beneficiaries of their good health.

The people who will go to this movie, who read the book, they’re probably trying to find some answers. I get that. A lot of us are looking for answers. Some of us look at the bottom of whiskey bottle; some of us look to a higher power; and apparently, some of us look to selfish, well-educated narcissists, who don’t provide you with any answers as much as they try to convince you that they have the answers. They don’t.

But let me tell you where you’re not going to find those answers: In a Hollywood movie directed by the asshole who created “Glee.” Sure, he can splice together a sexual-identity crisis with a soaring rendition of a Streisand showtune better than anyone, but he wouldn’t know sincerity if it were fucking him in the leg. He’s not a feature director; what he did to Running with Scissors was absolutely criminal, and if there was at some point something genuine in Gilbert’s memoir, it doesn’t exist here on the screen.

Putting aside the movie’s themes, how does it hold up as entertainment? It stinks. It’s a travelogue hosted by a solipsist. It’s like being forced to look at someone else’s vacation photos for two-and-a-half insufferable hours while they narrate their empty little epiphanies. “This is the pizza place where I discovered that life is not about pleasing other people; it’s about pleasing myself.” Fuck you, and your Buddhist Ayn Rand bullshit philosophy.

Eat, Pray, Love is about a woman with marital problems — we don’t ever really understand why — who decides to skip town for a year. She visits Italy, where she eats. She goes to India, where she meditates. And then she goes to Bali, where she finds a man. That’s it. Eat. Pray. Love. It’s right there in the title, so at least it’s not misleading.

There are exactly two genuine moments in the entire excruciating experience, and they involve Richard Jenkins — who plays a Texan visiting an Ashram in India — and Bardem, a divorced and heartbroken man who deeply loves his son. In fact, the only honest relationship in the entire movie is between Bardem’s character and his son. Ryan Murphy must have taken that day off to focus on the Lady Gaga episode of “Glee.” Roberts, of course, is Roberts: She alternates between pouting and breaking into that signature laugh like a epileptic Julia Roberts’ doll. Pull its string, and it will cackle like a burst balloon.

I’m not saying Eat, Pray, Love is a bad movie. I’m saying it’s fucking unbearable. It’s an embarrassment to women. It’s an embarrassment to film. It’s an embarrassment to the word profound. It’s a 150-minute big screen bumper sticker, and it says, “Shit happens. Pay attention to meeeeee.”

The next time Elizabeth Gilbert takes a trip in order to facilitate a memoir, I know the perfect destination. She can jump up my ass.









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



Julia Roberts Career Assessment | So Painfully Overrated | The Expendables | The Eighties Called...









Comments

So you're gonna get the dvd when it comes out?

Posted by: Porkchop Express at August 13, 2010 4:31 PM

Fuck you, and you’re Buddhist Ayn Rand bullshit philosophy.

Wrong spelling of "your". I forgive you though. You clearly just had a terrible experience.

How did they manage to get Javier Bardem and Billy Crudup, two likable and talented actors, to do this movie? I don't get it. Maybe Bardem was whoring up to Murphy cause he wanted to be on Glee. But that's no excuse.

Also, my mother gets mad at me when I point out the disgusting message of this movie. She actually takes personal offense when I point out Elizabeth Gilbert's shallow narcissism.

PS: Fuck you, Elizabeth Gilbert.

Posted by: A-schaef at August 13, 2010 4:32 PM

I knew from the wikipedia summary of the book's plot that I'd hate this one, and that ladyhelmet(RN) would of course be dying to see it when it finally arrived. Naturally her co-workers are all over her to see it, and now I know I'll hate it. Maybe I need to find her someone else to watch it with, or dangle our movie passes in front of her face and put the choice of her other targets to her: Inception or Salt.

Remind me again, why do I not drink??

Posted by: lordhelmet at August 13, 2010 4:39 PM

I am going through a soul crushing breakup and one of my facebook friends suggested seeing this movie as a way to get through it. Uh, no thanks. These are the same types of people who like Twilight, or Nickelback.

Posted by: Alli at August 13, 2010 4:47 PM

The first person in my family who recommends this movie to me is getting my foot up their ass. If you're reading this, I'm looking at you, grandma.

As if I'm going to take advice on spirituality and happiness from a rich, arrogant woman based on her all-expense paid vacation.

Posted by: logar at August 13, 2010 4:52 PM

Fuck you, and your Buddhist Ayn Rand bullshit philosophy.

Dustin, I love you. In a I've-never-met-you,-and-I-only-know-you-through-this-series-of-tubes, kind of way.

But still, it's love.

Posted by: Scully at August 13, 2010 4:52 PM

The entire time I read this review, I imagined it the way Louis Black would read it. I feel like I need scotch now!

Posted by: peachfish at August 13, 2010 4:55 PM

So you're gonna get the dvd when it comes out?

haha

Posted by: grinningdog at August 13, 2010 4:59 PM

I read the book, loved it, and saw the movie today. The movie doesn't do Elizabeth Gilbert justice. She's much wittier and upbeat than the movie portrayed her. The director nor Ms. Roberts captured the SPIRIT of Elizabeth or her story, which was really comical and upbeat. Don't blame the author. Read the book and you'll understand what I'm saying.

Posted by: Pat Parks at August 13, 2010 5:04 PM

Well... if this woman who seems to have everything going for her STILL needs to marvel at something and we're all pissed about it, then the joke's on us. Let her be. We may not have everything, but we still appreciate the little things in life.

Posted by: Sofía at August 13, 2010 5:06 PM

Whatever. I know The Secret, and I've self-actualized myself so far beyond this negater hater-ism.

Posted by: DarthCorleone at August 13, 2010 5:08 PM

"These are the same types of people who like Twilight, or Nickelback."

THIS. YYYEEEEEEESSSSSS.

Like the time my future MIL practically had a heart attack when I mentioned in conversation that I hated Home Improvement. "But it was so popular! Everyone liked it."

She actually said that to me.

Posted by: laurap at August 13, 2010 5:10 PM

Son, you keep hating on white people with such eloquence and you just might survive the Revolution. Hell, we might even put you in charge of something.

Posted by: Tracer Bullet at August 13, 2010 5:11 PM

I've read the book, I didn't find much about Gilbert to be fond of. Reading it was a chore, and although it was nice she didn't bad mouth her husband ( that I remember), I had no idea why she was so unhappy. I'm amazed I finished it really.

Posted by: Carrie at August 13, 2010 5:11 PM

"The entire time I read this review, I imagined it the way Louis Black would read it."

Fuck yeah! I read it again in Black's voice and it was even better.

Posted by: Seany D at August 13, 2010 5:18 PM

Yeah, I know I'm playing into the "People who manage to work their good deeds into virtually every conversation" card, but ...

When I was still living in SE Asia, I'd written something about these hipster neo-hippy types -- Bali and the West Coast of India (among other places) are absolutely infested with them. The self-righteous, self-indulgent, "I'm more at peace than you are" types. Unfortunately, I just wans't able to able to adequately describe my disdain for the crowd and I never published anything on the matter.

I almost feel the need thank Gilbert and Winfrey for publicizing these dregs the way they want need ... umm, almost. Actually, I'd rather thank you guys for trashing them far better than I ever could.

P.S. For the record, I went to Asia for the surf, not to find myself.

Posted by: A Bowl Of Stupid at August 13, 2010 5:25 PM

*slow clap*

Posted by: Tara at August 13, 2010 5:25 PM

Dustin, your opinion of a book you have not read is totally invalid.

Posted by: AM at August 13, 2010 5:30 PM

I discovered that life is not about pleasing other people; it’s about pleasing myself.

I've heard these kinds of platitudes from people I know before. Ironically, the people who say it are almost always the kind of people who have never put a moments effort into pleasing anyone but themselves in their entire damned lives.

There are a lot of them out there. This movie will probably make tons of money.

Posted by: imk at August 13, 2010 5:34 PM

What I love the most about 'self-help' stories like this is how the solution for anyone who is unhappy is to go travel the world, tsk tsk-ing at all of the unprivileged little people, all while living off our your own bottomless income.

Meanwhile, I have to save up for weeks to afford the Match.com subscription fee so that for a month, I can send awkwardly-worded greetings to women who will never answer them (perhaps because I can't afford to send them to Italy so they can find a more handsome man they can treat like dirt).

Movies/books like this one don't make me lose faith in women - I know that they're not all like this. But God, there's an awful lot of them out there.

Posted by: Leftylad at August 13, 2010 5:35 PM

The best part? Elizabeth Gilbert is also responsible for Coyote Ugly, which means she's inflicted TWO fucking awful movies on the American public. You fucking bitch.

Posted by: Jeremy Feist at August 13, 2010 5:36 PM

Buddhist Ayn Rand
thumbs up

It’s an embarrassment to women.
thumbs down...we don't reap the embarrssment on behalf of this movie anymore than men do for the A-Team...

Posted by: Sara Tonin at August 13, 2010 5:41 PM

@peachfish

That is awesome. Thank you!

Posted by: LowSlash at August 13, 2010 5:42 PM

god, i hate ayn rand. i'll never forget reading atlas shrugged for a class in college and feeling...soiled. i hope she's in an inner circle of hell with others of her ilk...such as the type of people julia roberts represents. ugh.

Posted by: splinter at August 13, 2010 5:42 PM

god, i hate ayn rand. i'll never forget reading atlas shrugged for a class in college and feeling...soiled. i hope she's in an inner circle of hell with others of her ilk...such as the type of people julia roberts represents. ugh.

Posted by: splinter at August 13, 2010 5:43 PM

My only critique of the whole "Eat Pray Love" backlash comes in when people unleash their vitriol towards this woman's lifestyle. How dare she-who-gets-an-advance say "Geez, this is so not my best year ever. Hellz yeah, bring on the vacation!"

Posted by: Hayden Tompkins at August 13, 2010 5:44 PM

sorry for the double post!

Posted by: splinter at August 13, 2010 5:44 PM

Sounds like the perfect movie for a "Look At Me!" country.

I get your point, but this is really no different from a TV schedule full of dating shows, those godawful housewives shows, the wedding shows, the Kardashians ... The difference is, the "Eat Pray Love" commercials will slack off after another week, but that other shit will still be on my TV. For years to come, I'm guessing.

We've gone from not paying attention to anything women say if it doesn't involve housework or child rearing or fashion to treating everything that comes out of their gaping pieholes (no matter how stupid or commonplace) as worthy simply because they have a vagina. Both extremes are bad.

Posted by: Slash at August 13, 2010 5:44 PM

I was sad and bored with my life-my book, "Drink, Fall, What the Hell did I do last...oh my God is that a human hand in the dog's mouth!!!" is going to be released next month. By the way, if you're looking for a left hand with a Tulane class ring and a few tooth marks have I got a deal for ya!

Posted by: Mrcreosote at August 13, 2010 5:45 PM

But which movie is gayer? This or The Expendables?

That's what I want to know, although I'm leaning towards the latter.

Posted by: Humpty at August 13, 2010 5:47 PM

AM,

It probably goes without saying, but I'll say it anyway- this is a movie review, not a book review.

And I quote: "I didn’t read the source material, so I can’t speak to the book. But this Elizabeth Gilbert — the one in the movie — I don’t see how anyone can relate to that character"

Valid.

Posted by: logar at August 13, 2010 5:53 PM

It is reviews like this that made me love this site in the first place. I second Scully's comment, and peachfish's too. Brilliant!

Posted by: muttley crew at August 13, 2010 6:00 PM

/slowclap

Yeah, man...just...yeah

Posted by: D-Day at August 13, 2010 6:09 PM

Alli, I'd make her take me to The Expendables if I were you. Nothing would take my mind off a breakup more than shit blowing up and Jason Statham. This movie would just make me angrier.

Blergh, I KNOW my Mother-in-law is gonna watch this, and love it. And she's gonna ask me to watch it, and I'll say no and she'll ask me why and I'll try very very hard to not say everything that is wrong with it because she won't get it and we'll get to that place where I just want to tell her that she has shitty taste in movies and EVERYTHING and it won't be good.

Posted by: figgy at August 13, 2010 6:19 PM

I originally didn't give this movie a second thought, but this review actually made me more interested in it (No worries, I'm not seeing it). In fact, I'd only heard of the book because of the South Park episode "Eat, Pray, Queef".

But it has me thinking now only because I HATE people like the main character. Dustin's analysis of her describes my religion teacher from this year to a tee. I know how close minded and ignorant everyone is, myself included, but CHRIST can you stop telling us about it?

Eventually I stopped challenging her and started to kiss ass all day because I was tired of getting 70s while everyone else was enjoying an A average.

Fuckin' hippies...

Posted by: Patrick the Bunny at August 13, 2010 6:19 PM

Also, I forgot to say how thoroughly I enjoy reading these reviews. Bravo sir!

Posted by: Patrick the Bunny at August 13, 2010 6:22 PM

Thanks for the brilliant review. Yes, I do know people like this Elizabeth Gilbert, and I do not care to cough up $12 to re-meet such people.

The only quibble I have is your line "Buddhist Ayn Rand bullshit philosophy". Buddhist and Ayn Rand are contradictory. Buddhists seek to overcome all earthly desires, while Randists exult their (very earthbound) selfishness as a highest virtue. It's kind of like calling someone a "communist fascist".

Posted by: True_Blue at August 13, 2010 6:22 PM

Listen, I haven’t seen the movie but I have read the book and I'd like to speak to some of the comments coming out the narrative. I entered into the book with the same kind of skepticism that most have described here on the site. I scanned each page, and read each sentence looking to confirm my preconceived beliefs that this was nothing but a privileged woman’s whining dribble. Throughout the beginning and Italy sections, I let out a bunch of grinning “huhs” when each line confirmed my preconceived beliefs. But as I read on, something happened. I found some things redeemable and even likable about this woman’s story. So before we go dismissing the whole Eat, Pray, Love phenomena as a bunch of selfish, entitled twat, and all women who liked the book as a bunch of stupid, selfish, narcissists let me offer two positive things that I took away from it.

(1) The idea of the restless roamer who can’t handle the confines of a simple settled life and must break off on a trip is a common trope in American imagination. It’s just that these protagonists are nearly always male. And these men – the Jack Kerouacs, the Cormac MacCarthy Suttree’s, the Townes Van Zandts – are the heroes and we love them despite (or because of) their flaws. These are some of my favorite narratives but I have always felt frustrated because there doesn’t seem like a space for me as a woman in them. Men are permitted to leave the responsibility of a settled life in a way that women are not. Gilbert’s narrative was frustrating for me because she wraps it in such an irkingly feminine sensibility – I found myself often wishing that she wouldn’t sound so week. But that also made it a distinctly female take on the genre. Despite the weaknesses and tiredness of the “art” that her journey produced, I am happy that there is a female version of the trope out there. And with her story, she is able to point out some of the some of weaknesses and petty exclusiveness of the male version of this troupe: the notion that the protagonist must be brooding, depressed, dark, deep (never superficial), and inaccessible to the rest of us earthy human beings.

(2) On that note, my favorite section and the only one that really had redeeming value to me was her time in India. Also, Richard from Texas is clearly the best character in the book. But what was great to me about that section was her description of a path towards a kind of spirituality. It took her a while, but during the process, she realized that she could find a kind spirituality as she was - rather than trying to be someone (for example the quiet brooding male figures that occupy these stories). She could be this person who was chatty, and sometimes hung-up on superficial things (a person that I’ll admit was often an insufferable character) – and within that persona, she could find and understand a greater connection to the universe, spirituality, faith, or whatever it is that any of us are seeking. I think that is an OK lesson to have out there.

I know that her journey required privilege that not many of us have. But it’s not like she was born with the money. She made that privilege through her previous work and writings - these are what enabled her to get a book deal. And despite its many flaws, I am glad to have a female version of this story as a part of popular consciousness. Something that shows that all women don’t have to settle down, marry, and have children, to achieve something meaningful in their lives. It's a starting place at least, and not something to completely throw under the bus.
(Sorry for the length)

Posted by: homeslice at August 13, 2010 6:26 PM

This review totally made my day. Cheers, Rowles.

Posted by: MelBivDevoe at August 13, 2010 6:33 PM

@splinter- I was a Ayn Rand when I was in high school, impressionable child that I was. I was blown away by her philosophy; It was so different from my Asian background. I admit I was smitten. I hate to admit it but I highlighted both The Fountainhead and Atlas Shrugged. Now that I'm older, I see the world differently. I am, however, grateful for having been introduced to her writing. It's the perfect example of what not be.

As for the topic, I'm not a Roberts fan and I particularly didn't like the book. I couldn't relate. I'm not white/privileged/rich. I can barely pay my university tuition. By the time I graduate, I'll be paying for it till I'm grey and saggy.

Posted by: Tallulahc at August 13, 2010 6:41 PM

Hey, lets agree that not every movie is for everyone. Why, not all of us can stand Ben Folds and his excuse for music. So live and let live. And chill.

Posted by: Fred E at August 13, 2010 7:01 PM

My best friend is dragging me to this tonight. I can't believe I'm seeing this shit on opening night. It'll be fun to see how many times I can mutter "jump up my ass, lady" during the movie though, so thanks! I've been referring to it as Whine, Navel-gaze, Vacation.

Posted by: Rachel at August 13, 2010 7:19 PM

homeslice, to me it's not the fact that she's a woman in this situation that bothers me. I haven't read Kerouac, etc yet (I keep meaning to), so I don't know the circumstances that they went out of. The thing that really bothers me is her sense of superiority and the fact that she left behind a stable life to gain some bullshit religious experience from other cultures.

Posted by: A-schaef at August 13, 2010 7:19 PM

I still don't get where all the bile that surrounds the 'just get fucking over it' crowd is coming from.

there's real rage here

Michael Bay doesn't get that kind of abuse round here - he gets humour and satire aimed at him - this is generating some real hate.

Also:
stating that you haven't read the source then
giving this
"and apparently, some of us look to selfish, well-educated narcissists, who don’t provide you with any answers as much as they try to convince you that they have the answers. They don’t. "
which is a crit of not so much the book as the book readers based on a personal perception - but still a crit based around the source material that you've already stated you haven't read is just shoddy writing/editing.

Plus you've just stated that your opinion of where meaning can be found in life overrides the opinion of others on where such meaning can be found - and that they are stupid for thinking that way in the first place.

That sir is Glenn Beck level logic.

Posted by: PyD at August 13, 2010 7:34 PM

This review.

I... I just...

*clap*

*clap*

*clap*

Posted by: Jelinas at August 13, 2010 7:35 PM

RE homeslice: "The idea of the restless roamer who can’t handle the confines of a simple settled life and must break off on a trip is a common trope in American imagination. It’s just that these protagonists are nearly always male. And these men – the Jack Kerouacs, the Cormac MacCarthy Suttree’s, the Townes Van Zandts – are the heroes and we love them despite (or because of) their flaws."

Good point.

Posted by: Slash at August 13, 2010 7:44 PM

"The next time Elizabeth Gilbert takes a trip in order to facilitate a memoir, I know the perfect destination. She can jump up my ass."

She's already got another book coming out, about how she dealt with marrying the Javier Bardem guy even though she thought she was over marriage. That sounds even more insufferable.

I've read the book, and have mixed feelings. On one level it has a good message: take risks, explore new things, get in touch with spirituality.
On the other hand, it's also a privileged and selfish endeavor. It sounds like the movie overshadows the good parts.

Posted by: Empress of All the Russias at August 13, 2010 7:57 PM

Fucking awesome review. I hate Julia Roberts. She -- along with Ms. Gilbert -- can jump up MY ass.

Posted by: Lake at August 13, 2010 8:09 PM

the person you describe...people who manage to mention in every conversation the good works they've done (btw, who are just like namedroppers...except they drop their own name) is *EXACTLY* like I guy I was involved with...and I could never adequately explain to my cousin what it was about him that I disliked, saying "He acts like such a d*ck toward me, but he does good works with children." You have hit the nail on the head and I must email her this, then call her and shout, "THAT'S HIM!!" Thank you...it was like mentally reaching for a common word that you suddenly forgot. Thank you.

Posted by: gambit_moon at August 13, 2010 8:22 PM

Denis Leary could make a 'Rescue Me' based film called:

Drink, Curse, Hate.

Would be more entertaining.

Posted by: oskar at August 13, 2010 8:29 PM

I just sent this article to a few of my friends and let's just say Pajiba just gained a few more fans. Awesome review, Dustin

Posted by: THRILLHO at August 13, 2010 8:33 PM

So McWhorseface made a movie about people who are even more annoying than she is. The last time this crap made a wave it was for the Sedona and San Miguel de Allende power center BS stone circles doofuses. I had the misfortune of passing through both cities within a few years of each other at the height of the nonsense. I thought psychobabble was bad until I was forced to listen to spiritualistic babble and by forced to listen I mean hearing to harpies shrieking this crap at each other across an other wise inoffensive restaurant in some east coast New Joisy Lon Guyland accent about how much more spiritual they were now in the same tone and volume they undoubtedly had previously let everyone in a several block radius how much they had saved by not buying retail.

Posted by: OscarTamerz at August 13, 2010 8:42 PM

I don't get the vitriol directed at this movie. It's a harmless film--another version of "Under the Tuscan Sun." It's not meant to be anything more than "A woman hates her life, travels, and then changes." Oh, how dare she! It amazes me how many lame movies get a pass while this movie is treated like the coming of the Apocalypse.

I get the sense that some guys (and some girls) get really pissed off at chick movies. WHY? Does your girlfriend drag you to them? You can say no. It just seems cool to make fun of all things liked by women--another version of that high school mentality where boys made fun of girls to prove that they're oh-so-manly. Frat Boy humor.

My boyfriend LOVES Jason Statham movies and I could care less. But I don't make fun of him for liking the "Big boys with big guns" fantasy shit. It's not a big deal. Geez, get a grip.


Posted by: Saphire at August 13, 2010 8:47 PM

So, let me get this straight. The Expendables is given an mild slam but still seen as "entertaining," but this movie is seen as flat-out horrible with lots of nastiness? Yeah, ok. You GUYS can go suck it.

Posted by: Megan at August 13, 2010 8:54 PM

It’s a 150-minute big screen bumper sticker, and it says, “Shit happens. Pay attention to meeeeee.”

I must find a way to incorporate this line into my everyday life. You are the Jesus of words, Dustin!

Posted by: fullertonregan at August 13, 2010 8:55 PM

Oh how I've yearned to find someone who'll call out "finding yourself" as the total bullshit it is. 99% of the time, "finding yourself" is a polite way of saying, "I want to abandon my responsibilities to everyone and everything else and pretend that adult life is what I thought it would be like when I was 15 years old and didn't know any better".

First step in "finding yourself": occasionally think about something other than yourself.

Posted by: Churchston Winsthill at August 13, 2010 8:58 PM

'Pull its string, and it will cackle like a burst balloon.'

Best line ever.

Posted by: Ginger at August 13, 2010 9:23 PM

I am in the opposite position here, having read the book and not seen the movie. I was hoping that the ubiquitous trailers, pop-up ads, and retail tie-ins were masking a film that actually did the book justice. Oh well. Had I known that the butcher behind "Running With Scissors" was involved I wouldn't have bothered even hoping. That movie was a massacre.

The vitriol towards Elizabeth Gilbert is pretty unjustified. The only thing she is guilty of is being a successful freelance writer who got a sweet-ass book deal to travel the world after her painful divorce. I sure as hell wouldn't turn that down. I have no doubt that the movie portrays her as a vapid moron, but give me a fucking break, guys. She didn't inflict Coyote Ugly on the viewing public. She wrote a fucking article, which was her job.

It took me three tries to make it through the book, but when I finally did, I found it pretty honest and funny, and not especially preachy. The part about buying the house for the Balinese woman is cringeworthy, I will admit. So is the ad campaign for this movie, and I wonder what Gilbert herself thinks about it. At least Julie Powell, infinitely more grating than Gilbert, got her book made into an appealing movie. I bet Elizabeth Gilbert wants to punch her (and then meditate about it).

Posted by: Cara at August 13, 2010 9:37 PM

I did read the source material for this movie, and after the funny part in Italy, the rest was smug and indulgent, and it wrapped up in a suspiciously tidy way. I mean, she financed this year-long trip with the advance money from her publisher knowing that she was going to write this book. And then it ended up making her life perfect, like a Hollywood movie? Hmm...

Posted by: Dorothy Snarker at August 13, 2010 9:41 PM

Money gives one the opportunity to indulge, good or bad. Away from pajiba you guys wouldn’t believe the type of person I really am. I’m shy, easy going, I day dream a lot, I’ve been called too sensitive. I got married in my thirties because I was on somewhat of a journey and I loved living and being alone. It afforded me the opportunity to quiet my mind. Some nights I would just sit in my apartment looking out the window for hours, not thinking about anything in particular but just sitting there letting my mind run free. I think people miss the opportunity to just sit back and reflect. The greatest journey I’ve ever taken was the journey inward. This movie fails to understand that your inner journey should not be to the detriment of other.

Posted by: Pookie at August 13, 2010 9:48 PM

yeah fuck bono!

Posted by: brian at August 13, 2010 9:48 PM

Hallelujah!

Pookie, you let out your soft side again.

Posted by: Cindy at August 13, 2010 10:11 PM

I think one of the reasons so many people get so angry about a movie/book like this is that so many people--women in particular--are passing it around like it is some amazing life-guide. (See the book review). Yes, The Expendables is probably silly and ridiculous but you don't see people running out and saying, "OMG, it's given my life a sense of direction--it's something to live by!" That's why it's not receiving the same ridicule. You don't see Oprah dedicating two days of her programming to discuss the importance of the life-lessons found in The Expendables. Her audience isn't filled with with women who have been so "deeply impacted" by Dolph Lundgren's(sp?) wise words. Movies/books like Eat,Pray,Love, the Secret, etc. are spread like that--like a rash!

Posted by: Sar at August 13, 2010 10:20 PM

"The next time Elizabeth Gilbert takes a trip in order to facilitate a memoir, I know the perfect destination. She can jump up my ass."

I guess she can join all the other travel writers of all time, and most nonfiction writers, many artists, and anyone else who's ever traveled with any intention of creating art as a result of said travels. There must be a lot of room in there.

Posted by: AM at August 13, 2010 10:45 PM

I didn't read the book and won't because it doesn't sound remotely good enough for me to spend time on. Life is short and there's a HELL of a lot of truly great books out there still to be read, so I try not to waste my time on crap (except when it's fun fluffy crap and that's what I need at the moment, but even that doesn't happen often--and this doesn't even look like fun crap).

I won't see the movie because of La Roberts, who just phones it in, playing herself in every damn thing she's in. And she? Is annoying.

Posted by: Snuggiepants at August 13, 2010 10:47 PM

after reading this, my vagina is singing.

oh sweet jesus. my brain is so fried, i've forgone the rules of grammar and now i've made it seem like my vagina knows how to yodel.

WHICH IT TOTALLY FUCKING DOES.

let me try again:

upon reading this, i heard the sweet sounds of jock jamz emanating from betwixt my legs. but soft! what song through yonder vagina breaks?

Y'ALL READY FOR THIS...

duh nuh nuh nuhnt nuhnt nuht nuhtnuh nuhtnuh nuhnt nuhnt nuhtnuh nuhtnuh

oh fuck it. don't pretend like you don't know what my vagina is singing.

Posted by: stopthemadness at August 13, 2010 10:48 PM

@Saphire: There is a difference, and I think a substantial one, between this movie and its ilk, and the action movie froth of Statham et al.
Below you will see a review of the book from Amazon which illustrates pretty well, I think, the different effect this sort of female self-actualization BS has on it's fans compared to the Arnie/Sly/Bruce etc. action tropes. I don't think that there are too many men who would talk of how they are on a three month tour of steamy tropical jungles looking for alien trophy hunters they can go mano a mano with....or haunting high rise office towers at Christmas time in hopes of getting into it with a group of high-tech international thieves....or...but I think you get the point. Unfortunately, movies (and books) like this create some pretty unrealistic expectations in some people that can lead to genuine problems in real relationships. I doubt very much that many marriages or relationships have broken up because some guy wants to go hunting terrorists in the wilds of Afghanistan with Sly-but I'd be willing to bet quite a bit that more than a few have experienced issues because of some sense of longing for a life that essentially has no more in common with reality than driving an Audi S8 upside down to knock a bomb off the underside and save a damsel's life. They are BOTH bullshit...but I suspect a lot more of the action movie fans KNOW it's bullshit.

"I loved this book!! Thank you for your well written story that has touched my life. I am surprised I haven't had this experience yet in my own life. I am in a similar place and needed to read this story. I am doing my own 3 month eat, pray, love. I read you don't read any of your reviews anymore and I have came to believe that some people just don't understand a spiritual journey.

Thanks again!
Elizabeth A Ziegler"

Mark M

Posted by: Mark M at August 13, 2010 11:04 PM

homeslice,

Your comment would have made one excellent Book Review. It should really be acknowledged as a perfect companion piece to Dustin's review, and one I'd like to think he'd approve of.

Anyone familiar with Dustin's writing knows that he would have been most eager and passionate to promote and single out every genuinely honest, literate, believable, even simply entertaining aspect of this movie.

I've said before that I really love reading those ass-shredding, appropriately hate-filled reviews of truly bad movies by the reviewers here, because it brings out their most creative and unguarded opinions, and in turn it's a catharsis for us to read someone's brilliant deconstruction of a film, and provides great laughs.

I could be way off base here, and it sure wouldn't be the first time, but the impression I got from this review was that Dustin was genuinely disgusted at the "fucking unbearable" disappointment he witnessed. It just made me feel uneasy, thinking of the state of mind he might have been in when writing it. But excellent, nonetheless.

When the most one might expect is 'tolerable', and proceeds to go so far beyond those boundaries as to inspire criticism like that, you'd better bet that the book could be a goddam masterpiece, but Dustin's reviewing a movie, and whether he's read the book or not is really relevant at all.

Posted by: Bill (Formerly Bill) at August 13, 2010 11:27 PM

"not relevant at all" - unnastan' me now

but "isn't really relevant" would have been better anyw-

shit, can't even make a graceful exit on a COMMENTS SECTION!!

Posted by: Bill (Formerly Bill) at August 13, 2010 11:30 PM

@MarkM. You've obviously never seen my boyfriend practice his MMA skills after watching one of those Statham movies. He comes home and throws these air punches, drop kicks and acts like he's some major badass. I just smile indulgently.

And, I agree with you on one point--anyone who sees these movies as anything other than movies, or pleasant diversions, needs a reality check. You can travel all you want. It's a great experience and I highly recommend it. But, you won't escape your problems, find instant enlightenment, or Javier Bardem waiting in Bali. NOT gonna happen. But, that's what these type of movies are obviously for, right?

Posted by: Saphire at August 13, 2010 11:48 PM

One of my favorite reviews in a while. Thanks Dustin.

Posted by: Dave at August 13, 2010 11:59 PM

"I discovered that life is not about pleasing other people; it’s about pleasing myself.” Fuck you, and your Buddhist Ayn Rand bullshit philosophy."

Yes, what would you know about pleasing yourself, and being a creator, verses imitation, you're a fucking movie critic.

How fucking original is that?

Posted by: Dudee at August 14, 2010 12:06 AM

I know I'm going to get flames for this, but I can't help myself: How is this boring-ass "Eat Pray Love" chick-flick (no commas for the movie title, folks) any different from that "acclaimed" yet, dreadfully-self-indulgent and BORING dude-movie "Easy Rider?" Well, I can think of one BIG reason: No one, except us on this page, gives a rat's ass about "Eat Pray Love," whereas, at least, "Easy Rider" is "critically-acclaimed," for WHAT I don't know.

I felt like I needed a third pack of cherry Now-and-Laters to chomp through when I watched that piece o' crap (oh, excuse me, ART)---Easy Rider---a few years ago. If you wanna smack Julia Roberts or Elizabeth Gilbert, then why doncha yank Dennis Hopper outta the grave and whack HIM, as well as Peter Fonda, AND, while you're at it, that Peter Coyote guy that does the voice-overs for all the "On-Drugs-Out-Of-Our-Minds-in-the-60s-and-70s'" documentaries on the History Channel?

Who gives a shit? Is "Eat Pray Love" worth all this vitriol, anymore than, say, "Prince of Persia"(Pronounced "Pur-see-uh," by the average 7-year-old)?

Frankly, "Easy Rider" is worthy of a lot more vitriol because it's been heralded as "the movie of a generation"... of what? Ruined, divorced, recovering-something-or-other-"Me-Generation"-ers?

I snort. And NOT a buncha white powder thru a crisp C-note...

Posted by: Stinky at August 14, 2010 12:47 AM

I'd like to thank our Google visitors for joining us, and welcome them back for more.

Posted by: replica at August 14, 2010 1:04 AM

Great review. thoroughly enjoyed the trashing of this over hyped crap. The title alone is enough to make you gag. What pretentious bullshit. Nothing worse than pseudo spiritual silly maxims. Thus quoth all the zombie-tards.

Posted by: Kgmfr at August 14, 2010 1:42 AM

replica made me snort.

Posted by: Snuggiepants at August 14, 2010 2:20 AM

We all have emptiness inside
We all have answers to find
But you can't win this fight

Life sucks, get a helmet. Excellent review, Dustin. I knew this was going to be an infuriating piece of shit.

I lump this flick into the same "my needs above all others" celebratory movies like "Revolutionary Road". That was an irritating ass movie too, and I love DiCaprio and Winslet in most everything else.

Posted by: TylerDFC at August 14, 2010 6:46 AM

It took way longer than I thought for someone to get huffy about Ayn Rand. Has humanity truly turned a corner, or is there just a shinier cover for psychopathic behavior masquerading as philosophy these days that I don't know about?

Posted by: sansho1 at August 14, 2010 9:00 AM

leftylad, I don't think the message of this movie is that the ONLY way to find yourself or be happy is to travel around the world. The movie certainly glamorizes traveling to exotic countries, but I don't think the point is SPEND MONEY TO BE HAPPY NOW.

Also, it's her money. She can do whatever the fuck she wants with it. As she should.

I think people are taking this waaaaay too seriously. Does the book or film ever say that the only way to find yourself is traveling around the world? I don't think so. Does it make it really pretty and tempting so that all of us feel the urge to visit such places? Yes, it does. It's a fucking movie. It's escapism.

Now I must go enjoy my last weeks in New York 'cause I still have 20% of myself that I need to find ASAP.

Posted by: Sofía at August 14, 2010 9:47 AM

You know what, I am really fucking pissed about this. I have no doubt that this movie is a piece of shit. And, it has (hopefully temporarily) ruined a song I really like by playing it over, and over, and over in its blanket marketing campaign.

My issue is not with the review of the movie, but with the attitude in the review and in the comments thread towards this woman, who might I add, is NOT Julia Roberts or comparable to Julie Powell. She was a successful writer before this book came out and she is even more so now, and what the fuck is the problem with that? Maybe she truly is self-involved and insufferable. Who the fuck knows, and also: maybe you all find her so insufferable because of her vagina. I don't play that card very often, but there's a lot of "fucking bitch" talk on this thread that is really pissing me off.

Posted by: Cara at August 14, 2010 10:12 AM

This is why I love you Rowles,I already knew why I hated this movie but wasn't eloquent enough to say it right.And Running with Scissors was an atrocity,I'm glad someone acknowledged that.As for Glee,I'll wait for that one to slowly bleed itself to death.

Posted by: nikolai at August 14, 2010 10:37 AM

If this is a movie that people "shouldn't take seriously," then why are people commenting on a movie review to say this? If people really think this is just escapism, why do they care enough to post here and say that? This is a site that DOES take movies seriously. Deal with it.

Posted by: Chris at August 14, 2010 10:48 AM

ONE.FUCKING.HUNDRED.FIFTY.MINUTES?

Mrs. , , even knowing my near-physical repulsion for Julia Roberts, threatened again today to make me watch this. And told me I'd better like it.

Seems I have some decisions to make ...

Posted by: , at August 14, 2010 1:25 PM

I struggled through this book and thought Gilbert was smug and the Bali house thing made my face burn with embarrassment.

BUT...I do think that traveling the world can be an eye opener for some of us. I left a dead end job to live and work abroad. I've had some of the best experiences of my life during my travels. But I didn't leave a husband (or even a boyfriend), and I have been very faithful at keeping in touch with family and friends. I work hard for not much money. I've given up a lot of luxuries, things I thought were necessary but really weren't, to live this life. It's made me stronger, braver.

I know the whole "finding yourself" thing is BS, and I know that running away from problems is never the solution. And I know that once you have a family, abandoning them to traipse around the world is unforgivable and incredibly selfish, but for some people, if the situation is right, traveling really can change a person, just as having a child or getting a better job or moving to a new city can change you.

So I disliked Gilbert in the book, but I can't fault her for leaving a marriage she was no longer happy in (and I have to give her credit, she never blamed her ex), nor can I hate her for getting paid to see the world, experience other cultures, learn a new language, etc. She did what a lot of people would like to do, it's just that she had the means to do it.

Posted by: lucy at August 14, 2010 1:44 PM

aka Gwyneth Paltrow's biography.

Posted by: JapJay at August 14, 2010 1:57 PM

Cara said "... maybe you all find her so insufferable because of her vagina. I don't play that card very often, but there's a lot of "fucking bitch" talk on this thread that is really pissing me off."

Word. I thought Pajiba was better than that, especially after the thoughtful chatter on the recent post about female fear and abuse.

Posted by: monkeyhateclean at August 14, 2010 1:59 PM

Wow. I go away for some hours and either Elizabeth Gilbert's Fan Club or her family must have found this site.

I always love the "If you haven't seen it/heard it/read it, then you don't know what you're talking about" defense. It's usually the last stop before we start getting questions regarding intelligence, background and sexual abilities.

If we accept that we are all able adults that can see and sense when something is of a quality making and when it's spurious, then that defense really has no merit.

And is this a carefree and light travelogue that is not to be taken seriously or a serious look into how a person affected real and compelling change in her life (and that you can follow to make changes in yours)? Which one is it?

Posted by: Fredo at August 14, 2010 2:13 PM

It’s an embarrassment to women.

Wait, what? Why is it an embarrassment to women? My impression is that it's just about the one woman, Elizabeth Gilbert, who had some money and traveled to some places and then wrote a book about it all. When did we decide that this successful, wealthy author was representative of all women? I know I didn't decide that, and I have a vagina, so I really think I should have been consulted at some point.

Posted by: Another Jen at August 14, 2010 2:23 PM

Second that, Cara. I think a lot of the word "selfish" being thrown around here has to do with her being a woman. I've never heard anyone rage against Tony Bourdain for having the AUDACITY, for being so SELFISH as to travel around the world, eating things he loves, pleasing himself at the cost of no one, sampling various cultures and then writing BOOKS about it. I mean, his books are about HIMSELF! He gets PAID to travel and EAT, and write about!! What a fucking cock, right? I mean he has a wife and kid, and he actually leaves them AT HOME to do these selfish trips.

No, you don't hear any of that. Wonder why?

Last thought. I think the name of the book is unfortunate and it probably wasn't Gilbert's choice cause I think she's smarter than this. But the title is ambiguous in that it can sound imperative or infinitive. In my opinion, having read the book, it's more of a theme. A little too cutesy-convenient, but I mean she did go and eat, then she prayed, then she loved. But it comes across as a command, too. So I can understand some of the indignation (I felt it myself) of looking at a book that appears to be ordering you to do as she did.

Still, I think a lot of this criticism is purely sexist.

Posted by: AM at August 14, 2010 2:25 PM

"If we accept that we are all able adults that can see and sense when something is of a quality making and when it's spurious, then that defense really has no merit."

Sorry, I don't accept that you can somehow "sense" what is written in a book you've never read. You can't. I am an able adult and I have myself read the book, and I can report from my first-hand knowledge that is it not spurious. How can that not trump your "sense" from, I don't know, sniffing Dustin's hallowed ass, that it's "not of a quality making?"

You don't have a leg to stand on.

Posted by: AM at August 14, 2010 2:36 PM

I take back everything I said bad about you.
A spot on review.

Posted by: mothy at August 14, 2010 2:38 PM

I can't speak for everybody, but I am not criticizing her because it's a woman. AM, your point about Tony Bourdain is way off base. He does that because he's a chef and food critic. He never said that it changed his life, and he never said that other people should try what he did. He left a wife and kid behind and then came right back when he was done travelling. Because that was his job.

I have no problem with the fact that Elizabeth Gilbert is a woman. It's the face that she advocates running from your problems and pretending they're fixed. And back the fuck off about the book. I don't think Dustin ever said that the book gave the same negative message as the movie. He was criticizing the message of the movie. Maybe they just got it wrong and the book is amazing. Maybe they got it right and you were fooled by Elizabeth Gilbert. But either way, the book is not relevant.

Posted by: A-schaef at August 14, 2010 2:43 PM

Despite my showing both this review and the following comments, the Missus STILL insisted on us seeing this movie.

Y'know how some people need to have a few drinks at the airport bar before boarding a plane for their flight? I think there ought to be a bar next to the concession counter at the movie theater. That way some of us hapless spouces can get a few shooters before forcing ourselves into the theater to face our doom like the Bridge of Sighs.

Some of us will still go kicking and screaming...

"NO! NONONONO! I DON'T WANNA GO THIS MOVIE! IT'LL MAKE MY BUM HURT LIKE THE TIME I WENT FOR ICE CREAM WITH UNCLE DUKE!"

Oh, somebody SOOOOOO owes me a post-cinematic bj for this one!

Posted by: bleujayone at August 14, 2010 3:28 PM

I think a lot of this criticism is purely sexist.

Indeed. Also, critics of Obama are racists, liberals are socialists, men are misogynists, Mormons are polygamists, muslims are jihadists, and closeted homosexuals become evangelists.

Posted by: Herber B. Brimmbury at August 14, 2010 3:42 PM

It's actually taken a lot longer than I thought it would for the cries of sexism and misogyny. I'm getting disappointed by this site.

Posted by: Porkchop Express at August 14, 2010 3:48 PM

I take back everything I said about being disappointed in this site after rereading Pookie's post. Pookie.... I just don't know what to say. Never thought the day would come. Cats and dogs living together. Will wonders never cease. That's all I got.

Posted by: Porkchop Express at August 14, 2010 4:02 PM

I've only gotten through the first few paragraphs and it sounds to me like this is a biography for Julia's life. Pass.

Posted by: Candy at August 14, 2010 4:12 PM

Sorry this is long. I don't think the anger is about the hokey, spiritual elements in the film. A lot of Oprah books have the same theme. Somehow w/Gilbert, it's VERY offensive. So much so--that it causes grown-ups to lose their shit and go into anger-fueled tirades.

And I find Dustin's review and some of his comments offensive. "This movie is an embarrassment to women"? Why the finger-wagging at women?

Does he say the same for The Expandables? Or, Iron Man? Or, Prince of Persia? These are all silly movies which promote a fantasy of all-powerful men, overcoming insane battles, and then rescuing some helpless dame who is nothing more than eye candy. I can't count how many times Spider Man had to rescue Kirsten Dunst's character in that franchise. Offensive is in the eye of the beholder, apparently.

What gets me is that Dustin presumes that women should be offended by a movie HE does not like. Some nerve! I wouldn't dare presume that men should be embarrassed by the male fantasy films. That's ridiculous. It's like telling men what kind of films they SHOULD like. Tranformers 10, Expandables 3, whatever. It's your money--watch what you want.

What I did notice in Dustin's review is how he described the character. She leaves a perfectly decent marriage and a nice guy to go off on an indulgent voyage of privilege. Hmmmm . . . that's interesting.

I think some of the vitriol is that this woman left a NICE GUY, went off ALONE, and then found a better GUY. The horror! Isn't it men who should do the leaving and not the other way around? Isn't that what all those male-dominated fantasy films show us? The guy is in charge. Women are supposed to sit there looking pretty, and waiting to get rescued.

Now, the anger suddenly makes a lot of sense to me. It seems to strike a hidden fear--you can be doing everything right, and the unhappy bitch just isn't satisified, is she? That uppity, spoiled, self-indulgent cow. What an embarrassment to all women. SHAME on you woman. SHAME! It's pretty funny, actually.

Posted by: Megan at August 14, 2010 4:40 PM

Thanks, homeslice, I've been thinking about the roadtrip genre lately (you can add Blue Highways and PowWow Highway to the list) and wondering why it is such an exclusively male genre...good food for thought.

Posted by: Alarmjaguar at August 14, 2010 4:51 PM

And Pookie, you continue to surprise!

Posted by: Alarmjaguar at August 14, 2010 4:53 PM

The whole part about this "finding yourself" is utter bullshit and very disingenuous on the part of the author. "Finding yourself" is usually a very personal issue. To want to go tell it on the mountain after the fact and expect everyone else to be hostage to your metaphysical transformation is a little pushy, to say the least.

And this is usually done w/out a family in tow. Doing this clearly selfish thing w/a family reeks and begs the charge of narcissism. That's why they say "experiment" in your early life, before you start making semi-permanent (because nothing is truly permanent) living choices that WILL affect other people.

I'm leaning toward saying something similar to what the review says, without the gender distinction: People who abandon their responsibilities and say after the fact, "I had to find myself" are fucking selfish tools with egos too big to even know what a fucking self is in the first place. Read what Kerouac etc.'s kids have to say about them: nothing nice. This isn't male/female; this is human. You think people who do this will actually say, "Yeah I'm a narcissistic tool who doesn't care about his/her relationship/family more than I let on and I'm abandoning them for my own better deal." People like this don't have that degree of self-honesty. And if they did, this wouldn't be the book that encapsulated that "journey".

Someone needed to fucking say it because too many of you here love your divide and conquer tactics.

This woman is selfish, the Beats were selfish, and so were the hippies. Some were more honest about their selfish motives than others. Drawing gender lines here and drawing timeless principles from them is causing YOU to fall into the trap this movie wants you to fall into. The debate is overexaggerated based on gender lines here and the trenches (idiotic ones) you like to dig when gender lines are addressed.

Grow the fuck up and give this some adult treatment, unlike this movie's author.

Posted by: Recondite at August 14, 2010 5:18 PM

Lots of valid points here on both sides. Dustin's review is hilarious, although I think the criticism is probably more valid of the movie than of the book. Gilbert's quite self-aware in the book, and makes absolutely no prescriptions for anyone else -- she totally acknowledges the rarity of her privilege and never ever suggests that anyone else should do what she's done. But Megan's right too. People -- women just as much as men -- seem to be very angry at Gilbert for leaving her nice husband, when all he wanted to do was give her a life that for many people would be a dream come true. Well, that's natural. It's easy to envy Gilbert. For one thing, if she didn't happen to be so pretty, she wouldn't have the romantic and social options that she has. People get mad when life's not fair.

Posted by: CJ at August 14, 2010 5:39 PM

Sofia - My complaint isn't that the movie is about a having a nice vacation or that going on vacation helped her get her life in order. Obviously, she can spend her own money how she wants and if it helps her on the way, all the better. God knows I'd like to be able to travel some day too.

What bothers me, more so than the pretentiousness of the movie, is that I KNOW people like this - who aren't just self-absorbed, but who think that the world revolves around them and that nothing can happen that isn't a direct result of their own thoughts or actions. I've lived my whole life around people, men and women, who treat the world like their own personal ongoing reality television show, and we're all just bit characters who are graced with their presence. When they're feeling down, they assume that all the world mourns with them, and once they feel better they delight in teaching the world a lesson about how everyone should solve their problems the same way.

It's not the being selfish, or the taking of 'me time', or even fleeing one's obligations that bothers me about the movie. We all do that from time to time, and sometimes it's even healthy. It's not even the fact that it's a bad movie - there are other bad movies out right now, and some that are even worse. It really isn't about the movie, but the message. It's this sense of conceit that we're bombarded with in everyday life from people who see stuff like this as a spiritual journey that we can all learn from; like it was all for our benefit.

I have to deal with people who think they're God's gift to Himself every day. I hate it, but I put up with it (because I work in retail and I have to). But the last think I want to see is something that glorifies this attitude to encourage others that self-importance is the same thing as enlightenment.

Posted by: Leftylad at August 14, 2010 5:45 PM

"E.P.L." is a P.O.S. Take one look at the most recent trailer and you'll see why ...

Academy Award Winner Julia Roberts
(emphasis added)

Movie Promotion for Retards, period, stop.

Posted by: Chucky at August 14, 2010 5:48 PM

It's wouldn't be such a soft-sell to people looking to justify their self-deception and attendant behaviors if it was called "Gorge, Indulge, Lust".

This points directly to the problem: Indulging with abandon (hedonism?), but instead sugar-coating it and calling it what it isn't. Is this so it will grace the consciousness more easily? The soft lies the Englishman told himself at the turn of the century in order to be comfortable with colonialism and essentially never knowing who he is? What's the difference here?

I wouldn't have as much of a problem w/the whole frame if it wasn't so full of shit. Without self-honesty, there is no authentic discovery.

What do bored, middle-upper class people do? Go on vacation and have a fling.

How is this different other than how the deluded author frames it?

Posted by: Recondite at August 14, 2010 6:33 PM

Yes, Tony Bourdain DOES in fact advocate that people travel, that they try new things, that they open their minds. That his travels to Vietnam, in particular, have changed his life...hell, that certain BITES of food have changed his life. And there's nothing wrong with that.

So, is the beef with Gilbert that she happened to experience a divorce before embarking on her travels? Are we really dumping this much rage on one woman who decided she wasn't happy in her marriage? Christ, I hate to break it to you. MILLIONS of people in this country get divorces from their perfectly decent spouses for all kinds of reasons - I'm not allowed to talk about gender, I guess, so I won't even go down the road of men who leave their wives for younger hotter women.

If you read the book you might not hate this effigy you've all built up and are so ready to burn. Seriously, the movie might suggest (or perhaps Dustin was prone to believe) that she left her perfectly nice husband and ditched all her responsibilities to go trotting off around the world spending oodles of money and looking fabulous all the time, but it simply wasn't so! Getting a divorce doesn't make you instantly free, trust me. And she wasn't. That was a hard decision, one she agonized over and tried to prevent. But fuck, it happens sometimes. Even Tony Bourdain is divorced!!

Posted by: AM at August 14, 2010 7:11 PM

Interesting concept Megan, but I have one question for you? In what world does finding a man with a bigger cock and learning how to make bananas foster have to do with enlightenment? I would think that some of the features of enlightenment are inner satisfaction and self reliance. If she was in a bad or abusive relationship, fine, I hope she leave, I’d even volunteer to drive her down to safe space myself. But she wasn’t, she was with a guy that didn’t quite do it for her and she wanted something better, and if that was the premise of the movie fine. But it wasn’t, the premise of the movie was about someone looking for enlightenment. So once again I ask? What does a fat cock and learning how to cook have to do with enlightenment?

Posted by: Pookie at August 14, 2010 9:02 PM

My new favorite quote.... "A lot of us are looking for answers. Some of us look at the bottom of whiskey bottle; some of us look to a higher power; and apparently, some of us look to selfish, well-educated narcissists, who don’t provide you with any answers as much as they try to convince you that they have the answers. They don't."

Posted by: Jennie at August 14, 2010 9:22 PM

Bourdain, as far as I know, doesn't claim to be in search of himself or some other stupid bullshit.

And Recondite for the win. I don't care if the person doing it has a vagina or a penis, it's still boorish and self-involved, at the least.

Posted by: Snuggiepants at August 14, 2010 9:35 PM

Good point Jennie, reminds me of a joke.


A zen master was walking down the straight and he came upon a hot dog vender. He gave the vender a crisp one hundred dollar bill and asked for a hot dog. The vendor gave the zen master a hot dog and began to walk away. The zen master said to the hot dog vendor where is my change. The hot dog vender replied “change comes from within.”

Posted by: Pookie at August 14, 2010 9:42 PM

The Zen Master walked up to a hot dog stand and said, "Make me one with everything."

I just guessing, but is the husband that she dumped paying for this whole trip?

Posted by: The Mutt at August 14, 2010 11:26 PM

@Pookie. I don't see this film as anything other than a pleasant diversion--a travel fantasy mostly. The fact that some people see it as a template for living is funny. Maybe, that's the problem--some people are taking the film too seriously?

And, a bigger cock doesn't have anything to do with enlightenment in my view, and that's not my point. Look people find their own meaning (or diversions) in life. It really doesn't matter to me whether they find enlightenment through food, a big cock, big boobs, big guns, or whatever. To each his own.

I just find it interesting that all this vitriol is thrown at this movie. Yet, we have so many other ridiculous movies out there (The Expendables, Will Ferrell movies, and Grown Ups anyone?). One person's BS is seen as horrid, while another's is given a pass. So, my point was to look at why, and come up w/an idea. That's it, really.

And, I think that people come into these movies with the mindsight that they will hate it. It's a film which caters to certain women's fantasies. What guy is going to identify with a female who leaves her nice husband to go find herself? Of course, they won't identify with her. They're going to feel bad for the nice guy left behind and find her to be a selfish cow. It's understandable.

But, instead of admitting that they don't like the movie for that reason, people say that the film is an "embarrassment to film," "to women," etc. So, it's an affront to all, because the film pisses me off personally.

It would be nice when people admit to their biases here. I certainly can't relate to the cartoon movies, The Expendables, Grown-Ups, and Will Ferrell, etc. But many guys I know love these films. So, I wouldn't say that these films are an embarrassment to all men just because I don't like them. I'm sure these films have their merits (even if I don't get it).


Posted by: Megan at August 15, 2010 12:00 AM

Dustin Rowles thank you very much. That was one of the best movie reviews i've read in a long time. Not just because youre bashing horse face Roberts'banshee cackle, which, is the downfall of humanity, but the way you wrote it was f*cking spectacular. I want more ppl to read this review. well played.

Posted by: Alejandro at August 15, 2010 12:48 AM

"I discovered that life is not about pleasing other people; it’s about pleasing myself."

Sooo...The meaning of life is not worrying about whether or not you can make the other person come, its all about masturbation?

Posted by: DD at August 15, 2010 6:45 AM

*frantic applause* Now excuse me, I have to go and invade Poland.

Posted by: eatprayqueef at August 15, 2010 8:28 AM

Really people, in the end, it's just another movie. Some people will pay to see it and some people won't. There is no need for all this vitriol and hate for Ms. Gilbert and what she chose to do with her life. And the hate for Julia is just puzzling to me. It's just a movie made from a book, about a self-indulgent woman on a "quest." It will be a hit because there are many women in this world who want to escape their mundane lives for a couple of hours. There is nothing wrong with that. Stop the hate!! God, people, it's a movie!!

And, Dustin, your review was way over the top, really. Not funny or interesting, just over the top and unnecessary. And most of these comments are jut nasty and painful. It's as if you are all taking this book and movie personally, like it's an affront to you. It isn't.

I didn't read the book and won't see the movie because it's not the sort of thing I read or watch. So, that's how I'm handling this. Much better than getting all hot and bothered over a movie!!! Come on people, calm down.

Posted by: mslewis at August 15, 2010 11:00 AM

“It will be a hit because there are many women in this world who want to escape their mundane lives for a couple of hours.”

Posted by: mslewis at August 15, 2010 11:00 AM

Sister, truer words have never been spoken. Unfortunately those broads bought that trouble on themselves with their constant nagging. Not for nothing lady but let me tell you something, a lot of guys out there would pay to see them leave.

Posted by: Pookie at August 15, 2010 11:32 AM

Sorry, I don't accept that you can somehow "sense" what is written in a book you've never read. You can't. I am an able adult and I have myself read the book, and I can report from my first-hand knowledge that is it not spurious. How can that not trump your "sense" from, I don't know, sniffing Dustin's hallowed ass, that it's "not of a quality making?"

You don't have a leg to stand on.

So you mean to tell me that I can't peruse Amazon.com or the local Barnes & Noble and come to a decision over a book before I buy it and read it? I can't pick up The Da Vinci Code and say "This is a crap" and not buy it? Or go to a movie theater and see Meet the Spartans is on and choose to go see something else?

How can you have any time to do anything but read then?

Posted by: Fredo at August 15, 2010 1:27 PM

Fredo, you don't know Johnny Ola do you?

Posted by: Pookie at August 15, 2010 2:29 PM

The whole running away thing bothers me to no end. Seems cowardly. Maybe I'm genderblind and don't see it when (if) men do this, but it seems way more women have this deal where when things go wrong they need to pull up stakes and run away.

"Too many bad reminders." Bullshit. Suck it up, or the ex wins.

Posted by: , at August 15, 2010 2:34 PM

Maybe if she would have done a better job of sucking in up things would have worked out better.

Posted by: Pookie at August 15, 2010 3:14 PM

"Sister, truer words have never been spoken. Unfortunately those broads bought that trouble on themselves with their constant nagging. Not for nothing lady but let me tell you something, a lot of guys out there would pay to see them leave.
Posted by: Pookie at August 15, 2010 11:32 AM"

So, then what is your problem with the film, exactly? The chick does leave, but YOU have been on this board non=stop complaining about the film. It seems that your words don't correlate to your actions. And don't even start about nagging? Look in the mirror, dude.

Posted by: shelly's thoughts at August 15, 2010 4:12 PM

I liked the book, the movie was "meh." I really don't understand what about the book caused such white-hot rage among normally-balanced people. As usual, I Blame the Patriarchy.

On that note, I think the movie was, as I said, "meh" but effective as an escapist fantasy for women. Men get these in the movies all the time.

Posted by: the essence of fanciness and class at August 15, 2010 5:53 PM

Pookie, it's not the way I wanted it!!! I was passed over!!!

Posted by: Fredo at August 15, 2010 5:53 PM

I recently purchased the book because the concept of self-discovery and exotic locals drew me in and.... I knew I would never go to see the movie. No way, no how.

The book is still sitting here with its binding intact. Today, however, I read somewhere on the web a comparison between the book and the movie and, yep, they took liberties with the movie.

I'll read the book and, if it's a good one, I'll be happy. If it stinks then I can happily revert back to the status quo, which is to say, I'll return to reading histories and biographies and skip the novel-esque renderings such as these.

Posted by: jmflynny at August 15, 2010 7:24 PM

Fredo, you're nothing to me now. You're not a brother, you're not a friend. I don't want to know you or what you do. I don't want to see you at the hotels, I don't want you near my house. When you see our mother, I want to know a day in advance, so I won't be there. You understand?

Posted by: Pookie at August 15, 2010 8:17 PM

Excellent review. Also, earnest responses to Pookie's comments always make me smile.

Posted by: nosio at August 15, 2010 8:26 PM

Shelly I do not want to get into a verbal altercation with you. I was merely stating that the broad in the movie was acting like she was going on Hajj or some shit, when in reality she was just looking to get laid. This is an outrage! I demand that you take back your other comments about me.

Posted by: Pookie at August 15, 2010 8:31 PM

Well, according to a posting on August 8th on the YogaDork blog, Ms. Roberts (along with the rest of her pride) are now all practicing devotees of Hinduism.

Looking forward to the inevitable book/DVD self-help program that's sure to follow.

Posted by: Votre at August 15, 2010 9:39 PM

I strongly recommend ﹏﹏﹏ Mixed friends ﹋ C o m ﹏﹏﹏ to you where I just found my interracial boyfriend! You know it

is a great place to meet black men and beautiful women. What's kind of relationship do you want?

Posted by: sophi at August 15, 2010 9:44 PM

Megan, I do think you make a fair point about gender here, but for me the major difference between this and Expendables etc. is that this movie--at least from the previews I've seen--is being set up as a self-satisfied inspiring tale for people to imitate in real life. Expendables' message--again, from the previews I've seen-- seems more "brain off, EXPLOSIONS ON!!!!" ridiculousness.

The second type of message I can deal with. The first makes my hackles rise.

Posted by: avocadolime at August 15, 2010 10:13 PM

The book made me ill. The only reason I kept reading was because I'd spent my hard earned money on it...but by the time I reached the Love part, I was ready to hurl it out the window.
What a self-absorbed ninny...
See the movie??? No friggin way.

Posted by: tamara at August 16, 2010 7:33 AM

Jesus Christ, the vitriol. And I'm not just talking about the review.
I haven't seen this movie yet, but I did read the book, and although I can't really relate to it b/c I'm not able to escape my life for months at a time traveling the world, I still enjoyed it. I'm not going to hate on this woman for decisions she's made in her own life, or for writing about it. If you hate the subject matter and the book, fine. But the venom in some of these comments is just, wow.
I'm not one of the Oprah followers who picks up every self help book out there, trying to "live my best life" by subscribing to O Magazine or giving myself an emotional makeover, and I hate Nickleback. But I enjoyed this book and look forward to seeing the movie. I didn't take it as something to emulate or live my life by, or even as something advisory. It was a book about somebody else that I read, enjoyed, and put down. Which is how I will treat the movie.

Posted by: Whorish Mouth at August 16, 2010 8:28 AM

I feel the need to support Dustin on the "women should be emabrrassed" line. Women went in their hordes to watch this film this weekend. I was even invited to an "Eat, Pray, Love" cocktail party (women only) on Saturday night. Women turned this unenjoyable and not very well-written (yes, I read it) book into a huge success. Women are to blame for this phenomenon and for so many other books that are "conceptualized" between author and publisher to appeal to a certain demographic of female before even a word has been put on the page. The unfortunate truth is that for those of us with brains who want to use them to appear more than just decorative elements in life, most of our sex lets us down horribly all the time.
And yes, I know someone will start a rant about books like that for men. For those, men should be embarrassed. But for this one, women should be embarrassed.

Posted by: PaddyDog at August 16, 2010 9:19 AM

By the way, for those of you who didn't read the book, here's a little excerpt:

"Using my keen intuitive powers, I e-mailed both men at the same time, asking in Italian, “Are you perhaps brothers?” It was Giovanni who wrote back this very provocativo message: “Even better. Twins!” Yes—much better. Tall, dark and handsome identical twenty-five-year-old twins, as it turned out, with those giant brown liquid-center Italian eyes that just unstitch me. After meeting the boys in person, I began to wonder if perhaps I should adjust my rule somewhat about remaining celibate this year. For instance, perhaps I could remain totally celibate except for keeping a pair of handsome twenty-five-year-old Italian twin brothers as lovers. Which was slightly reminiscent of a friend of mine who is vegetarian except for bacon, but nonetheless ... I was already composing my letter to Penthouse"

So you see: it's cliche-ridden, chick-lit style dreck. "Tall handsome Italians with liquid brown eyes?" Perhaps I would not feel so offended by this book if it had been written as if it didn't come out of "what middle-class women aged 25 to 55 want to read according to our focus groups this month" publisher's file number five.

Posted by: PaddyDog at August 16, 2010 9:49 AM

most of our sex lets us down horribly all the time.
---
Sorry to hear that. Maybe you're not doing it right. Can I help? My tongue runs on nuclear power.

Posted by: , at August 16, 2010 9:50 AM

Posted by: Recondite at August 14, 2010 5:18 PM

______________


Fuck. And Yeah.

Once you get married and have children, you need to grow up and realize that your decisions have a PROFOUND impact on the lives of your children. (Full disclosure: I haven't read the book or seen the movie) From what I gather, the author was unhappy in a marriage to a good man. Did she try to become happy within the marriage? Or did she have a few conversations with the hubby that didn't garner the answers she wanted and decided to leave him?

I ask because it touches on a troubling trend in marriages involving children. Once you have kids, you lose a large part of your right to be selfish. You want to be a good parent? Drop your fucking ego because your life belongs to someone else. I understand that divorce is a last resort in many cases (not including abuse and horrible treatment, in which case get the fuck out NOW) and applaud couples who do everything in their power to salvage things. They reach their tipping point with honesty and integrity. However, parents who refuse to put in the work necessary to tend their relationship are putting their children in serious jeopardy.

Ms. Gilbert's journey is what it is and I can bitch and moan about the over-privileged having too many options and too much free time, but that's not what gets me. If she dropped her marriage after a half-assed effort while abandoning her children to travel the globe on a devastatingly narcissistic journey of self-indulgence, then shame on her*. Kids are left confused, angry, ashamed, afraid, isolated, sad, and hating themselves by their parents' divorce. If you need self-enlightenment, you better hope the YMCA can help because your kids need you now more than ever. You know, unless you want to be the weeping parent on "Intervention" or enjoy bailing your 18 year old out of jail for blowing a dude in the park again.

*If proven wrong, Kballs reserves the right to rescind this statement as it directly regards Ms. Gilbert, and instead direct its vitriol at people who actually do such things.

Posted by: Kballs at August 16, 2010 10:08 AM

I know you were trying to have the ladies' backs when you wrote this review, dude. You weren't trying to be sexist. It just made me sad, reading it, because the sexism presented here is not only blatant, but intrinsic to your criticism of the movie.

I'm not saying the movie wasn't a shitpile. It was. I'm not saying Julia Roberts doesn't piss me off. She does.

I just don't understand why this is an "embarrassment to women." I don't understand why the protagonist's self-indulgence is any more offensive than that of countless male leads who have gone on similar navel-gazing adventures.

Go back, read what all the other lady commenters had to say. Don't get all defensive and huffy. Just think about it. Think about how you think about women. Please.

Posted by: Maddy at August 16, 2010 10:21 AM

Kballs, she doesn't have any children, and her realization that she didn't want any is what spurred the divorce.

Posted by: AM at August 16, 2010 10:28 AM

I think what is so astounding by a lot of the comments is how PERSONALLY people seem to be taking this book/movie, even those who never read it or saw it. I know this site is scathing and bitchy, but the venom seems misplaced.
And some seem to be assuming she had/left children...not the case.

Posted by: Whorish Mouth at August 16, 2010 10:53 AM

*"by" should have been "about". Needed to point that out before someone starts throwing knives. I'm going back over to The Expendables review. sheesh.

Posted by: Whorish Mouth at August 16, 2010 10:55 AM

AM,

Noted. Then direct my hate flame away from this book.

Posted by: Kballs at August 16, 2010 11:00 AM

Hey Cara...stop being such a f*cking b*tch. Because until YOUR comment...I didn't count one instance of anyone using that term or anything like it. Eff yer vagina postulate too as it is completely unfounded and unreasonable around these parts.

Posted by: PissBoy at August 16, 2010 11:45 AM

Happiness = I will never see this movie.

Posted by: MRod at August 16, 2010 12:53 PM

PissBoy,

Learn how to read.

"The best part? Elizabeth Gilbert is also responsible for Coyote Ugly, which means she's inflicted TWO fucking awful movies on the American public. You fucking bitch.

Posted by: Jeremy Feist at August 13, 2010 5:36 PM"

Posted by: An Atlantan at August 16, 2010 2:07 PM

It appears the movie is simply bad, regardless of its messages or themes. I think that's why I found Dustin's review so hilarious.

As far as the rest of the conversation about Buddha, Ayn Rand, male/female road trips, etc., I think some good points were made by AM and others. In his lusty desire to trash the movie, Dustin made some comments about other subjects that are probably a bit misplaced, but still funny nonetheless. The book does seem a lot better, based on the descriptions of those in this thread who have read it.

I don't know that you can excuse a movie like The Expendables because it's evidently aware that its crap. I think Pajiba readers know this and might still watch the movie as a guilty pleasure, but Pajiba readers know that a good 99% of Hollywood is crap. All the Hollywood studios do is pander to the lowest common denominator and market accordingly, whether it is the Expendables or Eat Pray Love. Either way the movies that get made and draw significant audiences are indicative of our general culture. In that sense I don't think the movies are actually any different- either way focus groups go and figure out the best way to sell their movies. The Expendables is not any more "meta" about it than Bud Light relying on sex and talking frogs to sell beer rather than the beer itself- the beer still sucks and nothing excuses that fact.

Posted by: Steve at August 16, 2010 2:39 PM

My uncle works with Doctors Without Borders in the slums of Southern India (where he ACTUALLY goes to help; wading in piss and shit and living in hovels next to rats and dead bodies, not living off a trust fund), and he said that a lot of people in India (both well off and poor) are puzzled as to why Americans feel they need to go to places like that to be become "enlightened" or why they need to even BE "enlightened." A lot of Indians just live and eat and breathe and exist, even though we think they're always meditating and living some holy existence. They're not rude and love meeting new people and learning English by talking with our family, but my uncle always uses one story as an analogy for the difference between us and the West. When he was in Calcutta he met an elderly man who lived on the side of the road and sold copper rings he made for a few rupees (it equaled to like three cents or something.) The man had no family, no major income, and slept and cooked and lived in the clothes he had on his back. He would just make his rings and smoke a cigarette and just live his life. My uncle in his down time started to sit near the man and the man didn't ask for food or anything, he would just keep working in silence unless my uncle asked him a question. He wasn't a swami that gave mystical answers or told my uncle some great truths, he just lived and worked and that was it. Because he had to travel light my uncle had pretty much two changes of clothes, his passport, some toilet paper and a book, but he asked the man if he wanted anything and he just asked for a cigarette. My uncle gave him the cigarette and bought three rings from him to take home with him. After a few weeks of sporadically sitting with him, one day the man apparently decided he was ready to die. He was old, but he wasn't in pain and he wasn't sick, he just felt that his life was in order and he was ready to go. So he gave away his rings and the tools he had, and just sat in silence and refused water and food. He wasn't crying or angry or asking for anything from anyone, just kept sitting in relaxed silence until he died, and they wrapped his body in a sheet and took it to the burning fields where he was cremated. My uncle says that India (not the Mumbai/tourist/Taj Mahal India), but the REAL India with the caste system and the slums and the waterfalls and rainforests.....it is what it is. There is no enlightenment because these people are just existing. The old man asked for only what he wanted, and when he was ready he chose to die. As an American I'm guilty of the "who am I? Where am I going?" mentality, but sometimes there isn't anything but what is in front of us.

Posted by: scorzi at August 16, 2010 2:40 PM

PissBoy:

You wrote:
"I didn't count one instance of anyone using that term or anything like it."

Actually, Feist used it, aimed directly at Gilbert.

As for the review: it's a shitty movie. I get it; I believe it. I ain't gonna see it. No doubt the film steam-rolled most of the nuance out of her story, as movies do.

I think the real problem here is with the Oprah-ization of Gilbert's book - the temptation to use her very personal and very honest story as some sort of guide to life. I like EPL well enough. Her latest, "Committed" about her decision to marry again, is better, if nearly as personal.


There are female idiots (of the sort who would take this book as a self-help guide) and there are male idiots. I refuse to take responsibility for anybody else's idiocy, regardless of gender.

Posted by: manders at August 16, 2010 2:43 PM

Yeah, I never read this book. I never read it, because I looked at the title and knew that it would be some hideous touchy-feely bullshit by an overprivileged white lady who goes to my homeland, puts on some batik, and sits in a paddy field in the lotus position watching exotic brown people toil around her, essentially using them as spiritual dildos to somehow feel like a better person. Thank for objectifying us, lady. Glad you got something out of it.

Posted by: Laura at August 16, 2010 3:29 PM

Oh no!!!! Well excuse the hell outta me!!!!!

One fucking comment by one person out of 149 saying that....which is a far cry from "...a lot of "fucking bitch" talk on this thread..."

Get off your fucking soap-boxes. Stop your grand-standing like there's really even an argument here and go back to shopping for ironic t-shirts.

Every person on here who's arguing about this shit missed the ENTIRE point/tone of Dustin's review.

Posted by: PissBoy at August 16, 2010 4:01 PM

oh...and An Atlantan, kindly, jump up my ass.

Posted by: PissBoy at August 16, 2010 4:10 PM

I don't know who you are but I love you! Great review! I did get half way through the book but it made my gag so I had to stop. You confirmed my suspicions about the movie.

Posted by: Kai at August 16, 2010 4:10 PM

Thanks, Steve. Kballs, I got some episodes of the L-word you can kindly burn.

Besides, shouldn't we really all be directing our vitriol at World Market, with its Eat Pray Love marketing blitz that began in JUNE?? THIS is the kind of materialistic, imperialist, cynical and misguided bullshit I love to hate. Oooh let's all go buy a "real" sari, a so-called whimsical gelato set and a...something Balinese! The Balinesier the better! I feel enlightened already.

Posted by: AM at August 16, 2010 4:51 PM

When Byron and Shelley did it in the 19th century it was awesome. When Hemingway and D.H. Lawrence did it in the 20th it was cool. But when Elizabeth Gilbert, a professional writer, wants to take a little time off and think about stuff and travel and exploit different cultures she's a selfish c*nt.

I'm not comparing Gilbert to those other writers, but this is not something new, except for the gender of the person doing it. The more things change.

Posted by: Abby at August 16, 2010 5:03 PM

PissBoy,

My bad. Perhaps I should have said, "Learn how to count" since you said "I didn't count one instance of anyone using that term or anything like it" and someone did, in fact, use that term.

But, I think my original comment of "Learn how to read" still stands since I was never on a "fucking soap-box." Nor did I engage in any "grand-standing."

And really? Ironic t-shirts? That's your comeback?

Grow the fuck up.

Posted by: An Atlantan at August 16, 2010 5:21 PM

Thanks Dustin for that great review. First off You got my respect and I like people like you who have the balls to say the truth.

To take a very strong and critical position when everyone seems to go ga ga over this book and film , It's hard to take a stand on something in the midst of many disparaging voices, and I encourage you for that.

Fact:
Elizabeth Gilbert's trip was financed by an advance on the book she already planned to write, and "Eat, Pray, Love" is the mixed result.

Do you people see the paradox here ??

On one hand, Eat, Pray, Love" is built on the notion of a woman trying to heal herself from a severe emotional and spiritual crisis; Gilbert suggests more than once that she was at risk for suicide.

She got paid for this new age crap thrown at us .

This is an embarassment of epic proportions and I hope people can see through this illusion.

Fuck you, and your Buddhist Ayn Rand bullshit philosophy.

And while we are at it, fuck you all twilight philosphers as well.

Posted by: Nick at August 16, 2010 5:28 PM

So Nick, you have a problem with writers getting paid?

Posted by: Abby at August 16, 2010 5:39 PM

Abby, I dont have any fucking problems with writers getting paid. You missed the point I was trying to make.

Its not like one of us just took a trip to find our inner self and came back enlightened with all the fucking answers to all our lifes problems.

This selfish, self righteous woman is totally self absorbed and all me , me and look at me.

In the words of laura , hideous touchy-feely bullshit by an overprivileged white lady who goes to my homeland, puts on some batik, and sits in a paddy field in the lotus position watching exotic brown people toil around her, essentially using them as spiritual dildos to somehow feel like a better person. Thank for objectifying us, lady. Glad you got something out of it.

Thanks Laura , couldnt have said it better ;-)

Posted by: Nick at August 16, 2010 5:47 PM

Abby, I dont have any fucking problems with writers getting paid. You missed the point I was trying to make.

Hmm. Then why:

Fact:
Elizabeth Gilbert's trip was financed by an advance on the book she already planned to write, and "Eat, Pray, Love" is the mixed result.
Do you people see the paradox here ??
On one hand, Eat, Pray, Love" is built on the notion of a woman trying to heal herself from a severe emotional and spiritual crisis; Gilbert suggests more than once that she was at risk for suicide.
She got paid for this new age crap thrown at us .

It seems to me you have a major problem with the fact that she got paid. Because you said so. I haven't read the woman's book, it isn't really my kind of thing, but she's a professional writer, thus she gets paid for writing. Writers often writer about their lives. Perhaps your point, if you had one, would be clearer if you weren't conflating several issues and if you dialed back the unnecessary hostility two or three notches?

Posted by: Abby at August 16, 2010 5:55 PM

I have read the book and seen the fucking movie. Maybe Abby, you need to do the same and then come back and talk about what you think about professional writers who come across as being insincere and superfical. I dont buy this crap .

Thats my fucking view.

You wanna get paid, fine, but dont get paid to make a buck selling your enlightenmnet crap.
Have some ethical standards and be sincere to yourself before sharing your fucking ideas in a book which you plan to share with others.

If you still dont get this , then I suggest just grow the fuck up .

Posted by: NIck at August 16, 2010 6:12 PM

Oh noes! A superficial Hollywood movie! I'm not sure I'm the one who needs to grow up Nick.

PS: I certainly hope you had my back when I was making a similar argument to yours regarding Wes Anderson's use of India in "The Darjeeling Ltd." But somehow I doubt it, seeing as Anderson is not a Uterine American.

Posted by: Abby at August 16, 2010 6:19 PM

I have seen "The Darjeeling Ltd" :-)

Dont worry , I have your back if you were making similar arguments regarding that movie ;-)

Wow, you grew up very quickly ;-)

Posted by: Nick at August 16, 2010 6:27 PM

Okay, I haven't had a dog in this fight, but I can say one thing with certainty:

I'm sick and tired of the bullshit such as "Uterine American".

Don't fucking pretend to give a shit about the female gender while lumping us all into one assinine category designed not to present women in a positive light, but instead to diminish the opinions of any men who dare to disagree with you.

It's called deflection. And anybody with a fucking brain can see through the tactic.

If you want to argue an opinion on a website paid for by someone else and offered to you free-of-charge, then fine, but don't think you can toss your weight around and nobody hit you back.

And don't try to make this a poor-little-woman thing.

Posted by: jmflynny at August 16, 2010 9:05 PM

And you have nothing but your sarcasm, since it's apparent you came here to troll the comments instead of actually adding anything of any sort of merit or substance or begin to engage anyone in any kind of argument. Not that I'm saying my comment had anything of merit other than me supposing that everyone seems to be missing Dustin's point. But fuck dude...at least I'm not some lifeless troll nitpicking on someone's words. Learn to read. Learn to count. blah...blah...

Enjoy sitting in front of your computer pompously thinking of your reply, making sure to use your spellcheck and thesaurus so as to sound as s.m.r.t. as possible. I'll be over here accidentally breezing over a single comment and not counting it.

(hopefully you realize I am not at all annoyed with you...the entire length of this comment thread has just effing derailed to the point that now my frustrations with it are being lobbed at a target who bit.)

Posted by: PissBoy at August 16, 2010 9:16 PM

@ jmflynny So many questions. What difference does who paid for this website make. What is a "poor little woman thing"? Puzzling.

Given the level of Nick's vitriol, I thought I was pretty polite. I diminished his opinions because they were stupid and badly expressed.

I have no problem with anyone disagreeing with me. I do have a problem with the free-flowing sexism on this thread in particular and Pajiba in general. Katherine Hegel is the devil, Sarah Jessica Parker is ugly, Julia Roberts is overrated, etc. etc. etc. I do not see this applied to equally mediocre male actors. This is a long way from film review.

Posted by: Abby at August 16, 2010 9:23 PM

I rarely post and when I do it is usually nothing but sarcasm, however Abby's 9:23 post(about how males are not portrayed negatively or mocked) is fucking nonsense.

Michael Bay is routinely eviscerated as being a douchebag and having a small cock. Franck Ribery was mocked during the World Cup for(unfortunately out of his control) being an ugly motherfucker. Paul Haggis is considered a cancer on this site. There are many, many other men getting skewered. It's not a fucking one way street here.

I really don't know what is up with some of the people here that seem to lurk in the grass and jump on one particular thread every 3 months or so. It's the same comments everytime and the commenters have blinders on, seeing what they want, when there is really nothing there. Nothing different than the way men are treated.

Posted by: Porkchop Express at August 16, 2010 9:44 PM

I don't quite understand the Heigel hate and I adore SJP. Julia Roberts, however pretty she may be, can act, but no longer chooses to do so.

And...no matter what my opinion on these matters, and no matter to what degree I may agree or disagree with the proprietor of this blog, I realize that there are easily 1M other things I could do on any given day rather than visit this site. The fact that I am here says that I enter willingly, as did you. If you are so offended by what you find here, why would you continue to subject yourself to it?

To try and draw a simile between action flicks and Eat, Pray, Love is absurd. Action flicks are fantasies. No one, not even those involved in the making of the movie, would suggest that anyone strap on an ak-47 and head out into the jungle to fight a predator nor would they suggest strapping suction cups to our feet and climbing a tall building. The difference, is that the movie Eat, Pray, Love is not attempting to create a fantasy but instead direct our attention to the possibility that we can (or should) follow the lead of the protagonist: Leave your life and problems behind you! Paradise is awaiting you! All you need to do is discover that it is all about you!

One of my favorite movies continues to be Sleepless in Seattle. However, in reality, Ms. Ryan's character doesn't look so good on paper: cheat, liar, stalker... but I'm a sucker for it. My favorite line of the movie belongs to Rosie O'Donnell "You don't want to be in love. You want to be in love in a movie!"

Women continue to wait for Mr. Right to save them and, absent that, for Calgon to take them away. In other words, for our problems to be taken away or to simply dissolve away. I say, face your friggin problems and get on with it.

In the meantime, I'll continue to enjoy certain chick-flicks while understanding that many others do not share in my taste. As well, I will continue to find The Godfather (both I and II) masterpeices. I think that The Dirty Dozen and The Magnificent Seven are endlessly entertaining.

In other words, I will watch what I watch and Dustin and Nick and Agent Bedhead and everyone else here will do the same. And, if you find us unenlightened or the commentary here crass, well...

There are about 1M other things that you can do with your evening as well.

Posted by: jmflynny at August 16, 2010 9:55 PM

I love me some mansplaining.

Well Porkchop Express I see it differently. And I'm sure no amount of arguing is going to change either of our minds, so I'm not going to bother.

But I will point out that even when you're insulting men, you use the terms "douchebag" and "motherfucker." Telling.

Posted by: Abby at August 16, 2010 9:56 PM

There are lots of other things I could be doing. But I don't remember asking your opinion on that.

Comparing films is a perfectly reasonable thing to do. I believe EPL is just as much of a fantasy as any action film. Not very many of us look like Julia Roberts or have the means to skip out for a year and eat gelato. I don't really like the idea of ghettoed escapism, this is for boys, this is for girls, but I also don't like violent action films so I guess I'm stuck with the cheesy rom-coms if I feel like turning my brain off for 2 hours.

I started reading here when Ranylt still wrote. And some of what is here is good. But the sexism gets worse and worse. Sorry you don't see that. You may some day.

Posted by: Abby at August 16, 2010 10:09 PM

Abby,
I don't know how long you've been around here, but you do realise that this is a predominately female site, right? If I remember the last stats correctly, something like 62% female. That such a small but vocal group sees a problem is also telling. I'm sure there are plenty of websites that fit your worldview. Why waste your time at a website that you think is sexist?

Posted by: Porkchop Express at August 16, 2010 10:11 PM

Too annoy assholes like you?

Posted by: Abby at August 16, 2010 10:13 PM

Ohhhh!

I get it now.

You are here to bring light to the masses. If only we "Uterine-Americans" would wake up and assume our righteous-indignation the world would be a better place.

I see. I really do. How could I have been so blind?

Whatever would the world do without good old fashioned Us vs. Them carnival barkers such as you?

Posted by: jmflynny at August 16, 2010 10:14 PM

@jmflynny I would have thought it was obvious that "Uterine American" was a joke.

As for the rest of it, sigh. Honey. No.

Posted by: Abby at August 16, 2010 10:30 PM

@jmflynny If by "Us vs. them carnival barkers" and "poor little woman thing" you mean feminists, well, what do you think your life would be like without the right to vote?

Posted by: Abby at August 16, 2010 10:40 PM

Haaa

First year women's-studies major, huh?

Posted by: jmflynny at August 16, 2010 10:47 PM

@jmflynny

No. But enjoy the Sarah Palin rally. Tea Party 4-evah!

Posted by: Abby at August 16, 2010 10:55 PM

Ouch!

How dare you compare me to a self-made woman!

Tsk tsk

What would your professor say?

Posted by: jmflynny at August 16, 2010 11:10 PM

I'm sure you and Mama Grizzly have much in common. In fact, you should go huntin' together. Be sure to wear something brown.

It's been fun. And remember, you may love patriarchy, but it doesn't love you back.

Posted by: Abby at August 16, 2010 11:30 PM

It's been fun. A little like playing with Barbies.

Posted by: jmflynny at August 17, 2010 12:20 AM

Geez Abby,

get a grip and stop being such a feminist.

I am sick and tired of the bullshit such as "Uterine American".

You dont like other peoples opinions then why waste your time here ? Trying to enlighten the masses ,

please find other 1 m ways to do something with your evening .

Posted by: Sarah at August 17, 2010 12:26 AM

@Sarah Get a grip and stop cutting and pasting other people's (not very interesting to begin with) remarks and passing them off as your own.

Posted by: Abby at August 17, 2010 12:30 AM


this movie was awful and dustin nailed it. the level of self-absorbtion demonstrated by the julia roberts character is indigenous to the female gender. if that is sexist, so be it. if
this portrayal of liz gilbert is even close to being authentic, she
should be required to wear a sign that says " danger " any time
she is in the company of a male.

like many of the other commenters, i didn't get the ayn rand
reference.

why does this film elicit so many responses? it could cure insomnia.

Posted by: snake at August 17, 2010 12:33 AM

Please dont try to make this a poor-little-woman thing , Abby.

Dont insult the rest of the women on this site with stuff like "Uterine American". And please dont try making this a sexism thing either.

You wanna annoy assholes here ?
You quoted "

And I'm sure no amount of arguing is going to change either of our minds, so I'm not going to bother."

Thats exactly what you are doing arguing with everyone here who has a different opinion as yours .

Please stop this nonsense.

Posted by: Joannap at August 17, 2010 12:37 AM

ooooh barbie girl Abby , did I hurt your feelings !

Posted by: Sarah at August 17, 2010 12:40 AM

Why do people keep cutting and pasting BS from other posters and passing it off as their own? I weep for our education system, truly. Can't anyone come up with their own tedious little thoughts?

As I said, and repeated, and should have been obvious, Uterine American was a joke. You know, like on America's Funnies Home Videos?

Nonsense is in the eye of the beholder, "Joannap." And your eye isn't too reliable.

Posted by: Abby at August 17, 2010 12:44 AM

You should be on Americas Funniest home videos , lol

Posted by: Joannap at August 17, 2010 12:54 AM

Ladies and gentlemen, I think Sarah Palin is in the building.

Posted by: Abby at August 17, 2010 12:57 AM

Ladies and gentlemen , Abby likes to play with barbies.

Posted by: Joannap at August 17, 2010 12:58 AM

PissBoy,

"the entire length of this comment thread has just effing derailed to the point that now my frustrations with it are being lobbed at a target who bit."

HA. That's kind of how my original comment started. Here's to us!

Posted by: Jen at August 17, 2010 9:29 AM

it should be called: "fuck. you. me." or "me. fuck. you." or "me. me. me."

This is a great review.

Posted by: Tripp Obrien at August 17, 2010 12:24 PM

Let's end this now.

Everyone who's been a lurker and is just now chiming in to comment on this particular thread, go back to lurking and leave the movie reviews to the grownups.

You know who you are, and we know who you are, considering most of the end of the thread is people who never comment here. Go watch Twilight or watch Oprah.

Posted by: scorzi at August 17, 2010 1:57 PM

You want to end it little boy , why dont you jump up my ass scorzi

Posted by: carzan at August 17, 2010 8:35 PM

It's just a BOOK/MOVIE.

NO WOMAN I know wanted to run away after reading the book. That was Gilbert's idea. She even said "this is not for everyone. I was lucky to do it. Find your own way. You can stay at home and still get a new perspective on life."

Most of you don't know her, haven't read the book, or even seen the movie. Instead, you are making all these assumptions that women will watch this film, and then, like zombies wander off searching for themselves.

Give us a break, guys. It's just a movie--just like the silly fantasy movies y'all like to watch.

And, why is it "selfish" for this woman to go off on her own and yet there are so many movies about men going off by themselves to travel, hunt, or whatever. Geez, the double standards are ridiculous. She was married, she wasn't a mother of 10.

Posted by: cecilia at August 18, 2010 2:14 AM

Oh, and another thing, if a woman really does leave her relationship after watching this film, then it wasn't much of a relationship to begin with. Or, the woman is not that bright.

I watch movies to escape--no movie has ever influenced me to "change my life." Do men really think women are that influenced by these books and films? You aren't giving women much credit and that's just sad.

Posted by: Cecilia at August 18, 2010 2:18 AM

You Cecilia are making the assumption that people wont be influenced to change their lives based on a book/movie.

Just because you dont know anyone who wants to run away after reading this book you think gives you the right to assume that many other wont ?

You are the one not giving enough credit that Gilbert is a dangerous woman with a crazy idea which can destroy many people with this notion that I need to be found. what the fuck ? Taking a fucking trip is not going to change your life or your problems or unlock the fucking doors of happiness.

Everyone has problems in life. Deal with them Dont fucking run away from them. Its called responsibility . Thats what growing up and maturity is all about. Grow the fuck up.

Being responisble and being true to yourself are good starters to get a better grip on life's reality.

Fuck you, and your Buddhist Ayn Rand bullshit philosophy.

Posted by: Splinter at August 18, 2010 8:00 AM

Exactly , thats what its all about. Confront your problems and be responsible.

Traveling is awesome and if you can afford to take a trip every once in a while, then you should do it.

Sadly, not everyone has the luxury to up and leave the country for several months of leisure time, which is my other problem with this book/film. A lot of us have jobs and responsibilities that prevent us from embarking on such a long vacation.
Taking a vacation is cool but dont be confused that once the vacation is over your problems are going to dissappear. It just means that you took a little time off to relax and now you come back and deal with your problems with a level refreshed head.

I cannot believe that people find wisdom in a book of someone whining and stuffing their face with pasta, followed by pages of whining about a Sanskrit chant and whining in general, followed by a whole lot more whining and woo woo in Bali?Where is the wisdom? Why is this book considered spiritual at all? I've never been able to work it out.

Women have a lot of luxurious options these days , if she’s willing to risk everything for enlightenment. Thanks to Oprah Winfrey and Elizabeth Gilbert.

Self-improvement culture in general has the contradictory effect of undermining self-assurance by suggesting that all of us are in need of constant, effortful (and often expensive) improvement. There is the danger of over-investing in this literature not only financially, but also psychologically.”

I am continually offended by the bullshit "self-help" that permeates at least American culture and continually profanes what should be an intensely personal and sacred quest. The worst part of it, for me, is how this has created a false sense of enlightenment in folks who wouldn't understand true sublimity if it smacked them in the face.

Yes, this book/movie is an embarrassment to women. I just wish that for every wealthy and insecure woman who can pony up to reach great heights of self and spending, there are thousands more whose lives are comparatively uncharmed, who are happier working with creative and healthy alternatives instead of spending on what they’re terrorized into wanting, and whose stories will, someday, be valued for the strength they communicate, not the fantasies they sell.

Just my two cents , God bless.

Posted by: Amanda at August 18, 2010 8:43 AM

Wow! Everyone who is posting anything on this site has absolutely made my day! Work sucked, I'm sick, and I just spent 2 hours looking up information on various heavy metal drummers (all of whom were male, old, and SUPER talented) out of sheer boredom and curiosity. I then fucked around on facebook, ended up on this review and started reading all of the comments!

Seriously, everyone, thank you so much for letting me know that I am not the only entitled american to actually spend hours of their time occupied in complete drivel.

Who the fuck cares if everyone (or anyone) disagrees (or agrees) with you? Are you all arguing about a movie (big social dilemma) for any other reason than to combat the utter boredom of day to day life?

But you all made my night. Thanks again.

Posted by: jay at August 18, 2010 8:12 PM

@Splinter. I hope you're joking. If you're not, then I think your response was very nasty to someone who was just expressing their opinion on a movie.

Elizabeth Gilbert a "dangerous woman"? Ummm, sure.
Are you Bill O'Reilly by any chance? He said Jen Aniston will destroy our society by endorsing single mothers. I think you are giving Gilbert way too much credit. The film didn't even do that well. It was beat by The Expandables.

And, she was responsible. She didn't just abandon the guy w/out telling him. They talked it over and they got a divorce. It happens all the time. And, traveling is not running away from your problems. People travel all the time to experience new things and new lifestyles. You sound really narrow-minded.

Posted by: whatever at August 18, 2010 9:37 PM

I guess i am in a minority..I liked the book and the movie. I love Italy and food! The scenary was beautiful! Richard Jenkins was great and his character was interesting. Javier Bardem is sexy as hell! Why can't Julia roberts smile and laugh. she is beautiful!

Posted by: Ellen Reynolds at August 20, 2010 11:22 AM

Okay, I just saw the movie yesterday, and yes, it's crap. I didn't dislike it for all of the same reasons as you though. I thought there were several moments and examples that could have been explored in a real way (for instance, why did she never seem angry at her ex husband for letting her down???? I don't think he was "loving" or "charming" -- I think he was a baby, and she did the right thing by no longer being married to a baby.

James Franco -- I know he's supposed to be the hot rebound guy, but there's no chemistry whatsoever between them. When she leaves dramatically, I just didn't get it. They had NADA going on between them anyway...

The BIG MOMENT, in India (why the F did she decide to schlep to India anyway, to follow her EX BOYFRIEND's guru??? Just...LAME!!!), when the Texas guy confesses to her why he's there -- I was daydreaming through this entire thing, because it rang so false. I told myself to hang in there, because maybe Javier Bardem would somehow redeem things. Didn't happen.

I actually left this movie before it ended, and I have no curiousity about how things turned out for her. Couldn't care less.

Dang, I can't believe I can still rant -- Julia R. looked absolutely frumpy and schlumpy the entire time. The filming of the countries in no way tempted me to see more---and I'm DYING to go to Italy!!!

Such a crappy movie, on so many levels....thanks for letting me vent.

Posted by: bunnyvelour at August 27, 2010 1:35 PM

Regardless of whether the movie sucked or not, what I hear is the conflict between the haves and have nots. Such animosity and jealousy because someone has the resources (that they earned!) to travel on a long term basis and do things that many of us dream of doing.

Posted by: wandalust4ever at August 31, 2010 1:07 PM

Seriously wanderlust? Elizabeth Gilbert was basically paid around one to two hundred k to go on a year long vacation that hardly counts as the sweat of one's brow. People hate this film because an overly privileged white woman was complaining about how hard her life was and then decided a trip that most people could not afford was the answer.

Posted by: Tchadensis at September 9, 2010 3:54 PM

Wouldn't it be interesting if the director purposely sabotaged the movie to make it this way and point out Gilbert's narcissism?

Posted by: AS at September 17, 2010 11:54 AM

IT IS ONE OF THE BEST MOVIE
GREAT ACTING, KIND AND NICE STORY
PEOPLE NEED MORE MOVIES LIKE THIS

Posted by: irene at September 18, 2010 8:42 PM

OMG.....@the original review and all the negative unproductive feedback...makes me thank God that I don't have you as a friend...I think the words itself...eat pray love inspires us to enjoy life, re-evaluate ourselves and what is important to us....and I haven't even seen the movie...looking very forward to it though...so chill out...and if you think you can be inspiration and a positive human being you go write a book.....

Posted by: Sigrid at October 6, 2010 3:13 AM

I've been coming back to this review for a couple of months now, just to bask in its awesomeness.

Thank you so much for writing such a brilliantly scathing review!

Posted by: Marksers at October 30, 2010 3:54 AM

Im very pround to be Indonesian and live in Bali. and for the nice movie ,Eat Pray and love.

Posted by: jeany at November 16, 2010 12:29 AM

I saw the movie, I identified with pieces of Elizabeth Gilbert and I am not privileged. I think we all yearn to discover ourselves, especially women. I also think we all hurt and are at times consumed by fear following heart break. Fearing love and feeling alienated from oneself are universal feelings. Perhaps she was fortunate in her ability to travel when embarking upon her path to self-discovery which most are not able to do. Nevertheless, one can still identify with the larger themes of the film. One can still feel like she does even if they are poor. The desire to discover oneself and to overcome pain is not reserved for the wealthy. The less wealthy simply find a less expensive means of accomplishing those goals.

Was the movie all that awful or are there too many angry and jealous people posting above....

Posted by: Darcy at November 29, 2010 11:17 PM

Sadly, I think Billy Crudup is giving up. For shame.

Posted by: Melissa at January 3, 2011 2:47 PM

I agree, Melissa.

Posted by: derekthered at January 3, 2011 8:43 PM

jeezussfukkingkeerystt..just netflixed this, and i am awash in woe..wussup, Javier? So amazing in Butiful, acted his manly gorjuss ass off, know he won't but hope he wins a little golden man for it..and now he sells his soul for this krapp?? Why oh why oh why oh why,Senor Bardem, oh whyyy??? I couldnt watch him kissin old Horsey, I finally just had to give up. There is no God.

Posted by: devildoggie at February 8, 2011 1:48 AM

It was just a crap film.

Posted by: em at March 18, 2011 6:41 AM

Precisely what some really good audio players for kids? My cousin is 5 yoa and for christmas I want to buy her a iphone, she loves my nano but I think it might be difficult for her to apply it. Are there the proper job ones for kids?

Posted by: MP3 players for kids at March 18, 2011 6:58 PM