web
counter
 

Drive Review: I'm Going Where the Road Won't Dare

By Daniel Carlson | Posted Under Film Reviews | Comments (52)



Drive-Review-2.jpg

When the lights came up at the end of Drive, my hands were still shaking, and the knot in the pit of my stomach had yet to untie itself. I can’t remember — honestly — the last time I was so utterly engaged with a thriller, so wowed by an action film, so seduced by a brand-new universe. Nicolas Refn’s slim, tight, riveting ride is just about perfect, from the glistening world of a broken Los Angeles as seen through Euro-pop lenses to the frenetic, awe-inspiring chase scenes that reinvigorate the genre. What makes the film work is Refn’s confidence in his ability to do more with less. Modern action films so often seem content to do the opposite: They’re titanic, massively constructed objects that achieve so much less with so much more because they trade away story for a series of exhausting sequences designed to force you into feeling a kind of confusion that the filmmakers hope will translate as excitement. You are asked to trick yourself into thinking you had a good time, or at least that you saw something coherent. Yet Refn knows that catharsis only comes after tension, and that true suspense requires devotion and patience. He’s a master at making little moments count for everything, and by dialing the action down to human levels, he makes it that much more amazing. A single slap becomes a shocking act of violence; a gunshot sounds like a cannon blast; a car chase turns the world on its end. Refn knows just how to grab you, and for every one of Drive’s 100 glorious minutes, he doesn’t let go.

But Refn’s film isn’t just one of the best action stories in years. It’s also a fantastically observed film about deception and appearances, and what it means to find yourself actively rooting for someone to do something very bad. The central character, the Driver (Ryan Gosling), feels a kindness and loyalty to those he cares about, but he’s also a criminal who can effortlessly and instantly transform into someone with the ability to threaten, fight, or kill an enemy. He’s neither wholly good or wholly bad; rather, he’s making those choices at every instant. Drive is basically an existential heist movie that deftly blends action and suspense with the very real struggle to decide what kind of life you want to lead. It’s a thriller with brains, a drama with muscle, and absolutely amazing from start to finish.

The Driver is a wheelman for hire who serves the thieves of greater Los Angeles with an autistic calm. He doesn’t panic or worry; he doesn’t fret or foam; he just moves through the city with graceful skill. He doesn’t talk much, even to people he likes, like Shannon (Bryan Cranston), who employs the Driver at his garage and repair shop and also outfits him with cars for jobs. The Driver’s not an idiot, nor is he condescending. He just doesn’t have much to say. He’s a creature of action and emotion, and Refn gets more miles out of Gosling’s half-smiles than he could from pages of dialogue. The script from Hossein Amini, based on the novel by James Sallis, was additionally stripped down and tweaked by Refn, often in the course of shooting. Cranston recently said that Refn met with the principal cast before production and had them pitch out ideas for scenes and character beats, many of which ended up in the script and on the screen because Refn “wanted that collaboration.” As a result, the Driver’s simplicity doesn’t feel like a tic, or (worse) a half-hearted attempt at symbolism. It’s just a natural part of his character that speaks to who he is and how he sees the world.

But as always happens, what starts out simple gets complicated. The Driver finds himself drawn to his neighbor, Irene (Carey Mulligan), and her young son, Benicio (Kaden Leos), though their halting attempts at a relationship falter when Irene’s husband, Standard (Oscar Isaac), gets out of prison. Standard still owes a lot of bad men some money, so the Driver gets involved and tries to help. In part it’s because he’s still devoted to Irene, but it’s also because this is something he knows how to do. The film deals almost entirely with the Driver’s attempts to help Standard and then escape the inevitable blowback.

It’s a simple story, but Refn doesn’t need a complicated one. He’s working on an instinctual level, as much at home with impressionistic montages and operatic song cues as he is with the pulsing action sequences that anchor the film. The gorgeous photography from Newton Thomas Sigel gives the nighttime scenes a crisp beauty that turns Los Angeles into an alien city, and the Driver himself is often bathed in dusky pinks and ripe greens as he makes his way through the silent streets. There’s a wonderful pop vibe to the film, thanks in large part to Cliff Martinez’s electronic score and the synth-heavy songs that recall the slippery polish of the 1980s. Refn picks and places songs with care, and he knows how to marry sound and image to create virtuosic moments of vengeance, anger, and redemption. It’s no accident that the lyrics to one repeated song talk about being “a real hero and a human being.” The Driver spends the film trying to figure out how to be both.

Gosling is mesmerizing as the wheelman with no name. He excels at playing men wrestling to keep their inner demons from manifesting themselves as chaotic external forces — the Jewish Neo-Nazi of The Believer, the drug-addled teacher of Half Nelson, the emotionally crippled lonely heart of Lars and the Real Girl — and he’s absolutely perfect as a simple man trying to do what he thinks is right. Gosling can pull the steel over his eyes in a heartbeat and then go back to being a misunderstood sweetie before anyone knows what happened. He’s backed by a fantastic cast, too. Cranston is warm but warped, while Mulligan is sweet without being naïve. Albert Brooks has a killer turn as a Bernie Rose, a local kingpin working with Cranston’s character, and it’s chilling to see him so believably deliver death threats. Bernie and the Driver are the twin hearts of the film, both capable of going to excess to take care of business. There’s a great moment when the characters meet and Refn acknowledges their true natures: Demurring from a handshake, the Driver says, “My hands are a little dirty,” to which Bernie replies with a shrug, “So are mine.” There’s not a wasted word, frame, or actor to be found.

It’s fitting, in a way, that Refn’s film is about a driver, when the experience of watching it is a lot like taking a ride. I wrote earlier about the film’s intoxicating blend of head and heart, of brains and brawn, but that’s only a fraction of its appeal. Refn is able to communicate very specific emotional states and transition between them quickly, which requires the viewer to relinquish a certain amount of control in order for the film to take them where Refn wants them to go. It’s not uncommon for Drive to move from action to romance to dark humor to awful violence in one fluid and dazzling motion, and that degree of emotional specificity is almost stomach-churning in an age when action films come coated with three layers of irony. You have to, in a sense, let Refn do the driving here. He’s made a gripping, moving, heart-stopping, revelatory thriller, and as he moves fast through the turns and floors the gas, you never want him to stop.

Daniel Carlson is the managing editor of Pajiba and a member of the Houston Film Critics Society and the Online Film Critics Society. He’s also a TV blogger for the Houston Press. He tweets more often than he should, and he blogs at Slowly Going Bald.









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



I Don't Know How She Does It Review: Take Your List of First World Problems and F*cking Choke On It | The Lion King 3-D Review: The Circle of Life for a Few Dollars More









Comments

I am so glad this is good, I want to see if for the G man and really wanted it to rock my face off. my husband will see it for Cranston since he has a man crush on him from Breaking Bad.

Posted by: jjrox at September 16, 2011 12:56 AM

OH FUCK YES

I HAVE ENOUGH GIDDINESS IN ME TO GO PUNCH A COMPLETE STRANGER IN THE MOTHERFUCKING FAAAAAAAAAAAAACE!

Posted by: sailboat at September 16, 2011 1:21 AM

Sold.

Posted by: , at September 16, 2011 1:27 AM

Good. I like Ryan.

Posted by: Candy at September 16, 2011 2:55 AM

The last time I was this excited for a film was the lead-up to There Will Be Blood, and that was the best film of the decade. I can't wait to see this, and I have an awesome feeling that it will not disappoint. Looks incredible.

I n the sage words of Bart Scott, "CAN'T WAIT!"

Posted by: Ty at September 16, 2011 2:57 AM

I love me some Baby Goose, and this fantastically written review makes me want to go out and see this film IMMEDIATELY.

Posted by: Jelinas at September 16, 2011 3:11 AM

I love it that Bryan Cranston keeps getting solid parts! He's such an awesome actor; totally deserved.

Posted by: severine at September 16, 2011 5:31 AM

Awesome. That critique is really doing it for me. And now I am excited for a movie, which hasn't really happened this year. Baby Goose and Mister White in a great action flick, yay!

Posted by: romain at September 16, 2011 6:01 AM

Such a long build-up, so much anticipation; bathtubs full of anxiety that it wouldn't pan out the way I was hoping it would, but satan slap me if every review I've read so far hasn't chucked those bathtubs out the window. And Dan, your review is almost word-for-word how I hoped it would be. This film was made for me. I cannot FUCKING wait to see this film.

Posted by: zeke the pig at September 16, 2011 6:53 AM

"Standard"?! STANDARD. What kind of name is that?

Really looking forward to this. Nice review, Dan.

Posted by: Lauren at September 16, 2011 7:14 AM

Really lovely review! Very much looking forward to this one!

Posted by: KatSings at September 16, 2011 8:35 AM

Good review Carlson, though I’m not a big Gosling fan I’m still going to see it. I like the way the director shot the film, it reminds me of the way that Michael Mann shoots his movies.

Posted by: Pookie at September 16, 2011 8:48 AM

I haven't loved a film like this in ages - I saw it a week ago and it has stuck with me in such a consuming way. Great review.

Posted by: Jane at September 16, 2011 9:29 AM

Does anyone ride on the path we made to Union Square?

Posted by: Mattfactor at September 16, 2011 10:03 AM

Two of my roommates saw this in a free advanced screening and they raaaaaaaved about it. This really just cinches it for me. I really have to see this movie.

Posted by: Sassafrass Green at September 16, 2011 12:12 PM

So this is like The Transporter....but for Grown Ups. Awesome. Can't wait to see it.

Posted by: Keith at September 16, 2011 1:15 PM

I am not usually one to get all swoony for Baby Goose, but this review has me kinda excited.

Posted by: Angeleno Ewok at September 16, 2011 1:16 PM

Although I didn't quite like the movie as the reviewer (maybe because I had too much expectations)

But, my everloving Godtopus, was the Gosling hot in this movie! I think my girlfriend got a little worried after I poured my manlove of Gosling over her.

Posted by: Ari at September 16, 2011 1:56 PM

This review just made me a little hard.

Posted by: The_wakeful at September 16, 2011 3:51 PM

Is he really fucking serious, with those gloves? ARE YOU FUCKING KIDDING ME.

Posted by: Snath at September 16, 2011 4:49 PM

Saw it today, it's pretty f-in great.

Two female suburban senior citizens in the restroom after, one is saying to the other, "...like the Fast and Furious movies, there's another one coming out, I thought this was it. Obviously, it wasn't. I'm sorry for bringing you, this movie was AWFUL, there was no dialogue for the first 45 minutes!!"

She's right, there kind of wasn't, and it was like a bath in awesome sauce.

Posted by: Opie1 at September 16, 2011 5:29 PM

... I used to be able to say, "you remember films like like Scorsese's Taxi Driver? Peckinpah's Straw Dogs (remade already and shouldn't have been)? De Palma's Carlito's Way? Hollywood just doesn't make movies like that anymore." Now I can't say that. Drive fits well within that category of classic action flicks that resonate. I'm glad this was made. Gives me hope for the future of great cinema.

Posted by: Brian Kehinde at September 16, 2011 6:09 PM

Fantastic review, Dan. I'm beyond pumped to see this.

Posted by: Kolby at September 16, 2011 6:52 PM

It's as great as I hoped it would be. That hasn't happened since The Dark Knight.

Posted by: junierizzle at September 16, 2011 8:27 PM

Saw it based on this review and boredom...it was stellar. but by far the best part was at the end the audience of idiots being super pissed that it had a brain and wasnt Michael Bay blowing shit up

Posted by: Luke at September 16, 2011 9:09 PM

Meh

Posted by: Jeremy at September 16, 2011 9:52 PM

It's gonna be a long time before I stop thinking about this movie. It was so beautiful and horrible and I wanted more. I haven't left the theater so wonderfully conflicted in some time.

Posted by: Larold at September 17, 2011 1:11 AM

@Snath: Those are, in fact, proper stringback driving gloves. Quite appropriate for the character.

Posted by: MarkM at September 17, 2011 2:03 AM

BarbadoSlim Approved.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at September 17, 2011 2:38 AM

I saw this last night with a theater full of baboons. I get that some people react with laughter to images of shocking, horrific violence, but these creeps cheered loudly at every gruesome turn. When the lights came up I practically ran out of the theater so I wouldn't try to stab anyone, I was so furious. On the way out I saw who it was that had been so perversely (and loudly) enjoying the film: The entire University of Illinois football team. We're going to see them play today. I guess that disturbing bloodlust is probably good for their chances?

Posted by: antoinette jeanine at September 17, 2011 10:01 AM

(Edited with this disclaimer: Substantial spoilers for those of you who don't want to read about some of the film's more violent moments. You've been warned. — DC)

Well, based on this review I took my wife to see this movie last night. We both hated it. And I've probably lost my privileges to direct her to a movie sight unseen for a long time.

Spoilers, but I don't care. We got to see:

1) Someone stomping someone's head so it exploded like a grapefruit.
2) Someone stick a fork in someones eye
3) Someone cut open another person's wrist so they can bleed to death
4) Someone's head blown apart by a shotgun blast.

Etc.

Then there were the goofy, unbelievable moments. The Driver and the girl make out in an elevator when he realizes a killer is in there with them. Ok. He wears a mask and the movie suddenly turns into Halloween, as he dramatically stands on a cliff above the helpless soon to be victim. The plot device that $300k is going to get THE DRIVER into NASCAR racing.

I thought the first 15 minutes were dramatic and filled with tension as he did one of his getaway driving jobs for two bad guys. We never got to see that again.

Minimalist, pretentious, cartoonish violence? Who could like that crap?

Posted by: jake gittes at September 17, 2011 11:19 AM

Gittes you son of a bitch, get out of my head. I verify all statements made by the aforementioned.

Posted by: DBO at September 17, 2011 11:58 AM

"...I've probably lost my privileges to direct (my wife) to a movie sight unseen for a long time."

She sounds neat.

Posted by: firedmyass at September 17, 2011 2:22 PM

Main character who appears to have nothing behind his eyeballs. Vomit-inducing violence. Annoying 1980s feel and score. Air of pretentious portentousness. It's Irreversible with cars!

Posted by: Jamie at September 17, 2011 7:54 PM

I saw it today and I have to say, outside of the main characters (Driver, Girl, Girl's husband), I never really felt like I had a grasp on what the fuck was going on.

I feel bad about this, but it's true. This is not a movie for the intellectually lazy.

Posted by: Skyler Durden at September 17, 2011 8:05 PM

Jake Gittes, you douche, you really need to give WAY more warning about spoilage before you give away a major plot point like that.

Posted by: Maryscott O'Connor at September 17, 2011 8:22 PM

Just came back from seeing this and it still haunts me.

Admittedly I went expecting something closer to the "Fast & Furious" side of the spectrum so in that regard the previews and even the name "Drive" may be a bit misleading. Similarly this is a violent film and that also was something I wasn't expecting.

But if you're looking for a thoughtful action movie with a dark hero that does a great job of "show don't tell" than Drive more than fits the bill.

Ryan Gosling is truly a rare talent.

Posted by: Alexis at September 17, 2011 10:08 PM

Take a pill, guys. I just went to see this and I'm distincly underwhelmed. I can't believe the way this reviewer and some others rhapsodize over this movie.
Gosling sits there through this mostly slow picture with a dumb look on his face, a blank look, or just a really vacant look. Cary Mulligan is adorable, but is wasted with nothing to do at all, except look cute and vulnerable with more boring, endless shots of her smiling at Gosling.
The violence is really over the top, which was repulsive, and I normally don't complain about violence in films (loved "The Departed.")

On the plus side, the couple of brief car chases are really good, and it's a blast seeing the rest of the cast like Cranston, Cristina Hendricks, Albert Brooks, etc. Otherwise, though, I felt cheated by this film, never felt totally involved, and I wanted my hour and forty minutes back.

Posted by: KonaKathie at September 18, 2011 1:03 AM

Maryscott, you'll get over it.

Posted by: jake gittes at September 18, 2011 8:03 AM

NOT a movie for the intellectually lazy? What the hell do you have to think about? What intricate plot devices require deep thought? Trying to catch whether or not the Driver has his fucking toothpick in his mouth?

Posted by: jake gittes at September 18, 2011 8:05 AM

Oh, sorry, I should have added a spoiler to the above. He chews on a toothpick. When he gave the little kid his own toothpick....let me tell ya....Niagara Falls. Haunting.

Posted by: jake gittes at September 18, 2011 8:07 AM

Apparently I said something incredibly offensive in my post yesterday. Like nothing at all offensive and people have said much worst in this thread alone. Anyways, my apologies. I'm sure Drive is a wonderful movie everyone will forget about by the end of the year.

Posted by: googergieger at September 18, 2011 1:47 PM

I love people who want their movie violence to be all neat and tidy. We want to see people die, and probably a lot of them, but please let's not go over the top. Think of the children.

Posted by: Socraz6 at September 19, 2011 11:17 AM

@Socraz6: Reminds me of this:

I need to watch things die
From a good safe distance

Posted by: FabMax at September 19, 2011 6:51 PM

I am already a Gosling fan (which I was for years before I ever saw The Notebook, which I'm not much of a fan of) and I'm a fan of Cranston and Ron Perlman. Lots of great actors in this film doing great work.

What I noticed while watching it was that there were so many quiet moments, and it seemed to make a lot of the audience uncomfortable. I loved it. Movies today are so talky, and I like that too, but this felt different than most of the other things I've seen recently, and I felt like the juxtaposition of the those quiet moments with the violence made the violence feel more real and meaningful than it does in a cacophony of violence like you see in most movies. I stopped to consider the violence I was seeing in a way I sadly don't that often anymore in tv and film, and I'm probably more on the queasy side than most. The movie was spare in a wonderful way, but a way that will not appeal to everyone, and that's okay.

On a superficial note, they made Christina Hendricks seem much less attractive than I've ever seen her before, and I like her sexy.

Posted by: Katie at September 20, 2011 12:17 PM

I agree Katie, Christina Hendricks was done no favors in this movie.

Posted by: Stella at September 21, 2011 11:13 PM

This was everything I hoped it would be and more. Yes, the violence was intense (and I had to respond with laughter in parts because... WOW), but the silent moments were extremely powerful. I LOVED the 80s vibe. Gosling's performance was incredible. You really had no idea where this person was coming from or what he had experienced in life before meeting Mulligan and her son, and that made his reaction to the chain of events even more intriguing.

Highly recommend.

Posted by: Mel C. at September 26, 2011 9:44 AM

I just saw this and thought it was excellent, but disagree on one point. Albert Brooks was dreadful. I can't decide if it was because I could see him acting or that he wasn't bothering to act at all. He almost ruined it for me.

Posted by: Carrie at September 28, 2011 5:09 PM

Just saw this film, and I think your analysis is spot on, and beautifully written, but I personally was frustrated with the musical montages. They almost ruined the movie for me; it's not enough to call them distracting, because they're clearly meant to be present and important, but the danger in making the music (especially actual songs with clear lyrics that are hammering home an emotional point) so essential to a scene is that if the songs aren't good, the whole scene falls apart. I wanted that ending to be so moving to me, but that song invaded and kicked me in the ears. It's definitely a person-to-person problem, but for me, it was disappointing. Still a great film overall.

Posted by: ChristianH at September 30, 2011 12:57 PM

Just got back from seeing this and was distinctly underwhelmed. In other hands, this film could have been great, but Refn is too intent on making a "serious" film.

I honestly can't see what the reviewer was gushing about. Perhaps if I saw more of the action drivel released each week, I would latch onto this film merely as something different. Instead, all I saw was a jumble of parts that could have been good (excellent acting, gritty violence, use of silence and lack of dialogue, slow pacing), but failed to come together.

Also, I found the film score completely distracting and the entire 80s vibe misplaced.

Posted by: WestCoastPat at October 2, 2011 3:18 AM

Was like a weird 100 minute long music video, not very engaging, and not very interesting. Most of the audience was laughing at the cheesiness, and I couldn't help but laugh too.

Posted by: Slim at October 4, 2011 5:29 AM

People are freaking out about this movie like they’ve been fingerbanged by Jesus and I can only assume they are excited by the stylised tone to the point that they are willing to ignore its obvious superficiality and cynicism. But I can only say what I truly feel, and that is, this movie is a con.

The best things about it are: Ryan’s awesome scorpion jacket. Kavinsky’s ‘Nightcall’. The opening action scene. The heist sequence. A few moments of violent, well-shot action give the movie a brief pulse.

But that’s pretty much it. There are so many interminable long moments where the two comatose leads stare at each other as if something meaningful is going on beneath the surface. But there is no subtext here. The writing, direction and acting are all underplayed to the point of tedium. It has a promising premise; what a great idea, a story about a Hollywood stuntman who lives a double life…so much could be done with this. But here it never really gets going. I suspect this is a very shallow movie that critics are fawning over because it won something at Cannes, and it isn’t Transformers. But if that's all it takes to be a masterpiece, then god help us!

Overall, Drive is so insistently cool, it chilled me to the marrow. Even more disappointingly, it’s not even that stylish - some nice shots of LA at night and 80s italic neon pink credits do not equal an artistic statement or anything that can be called an original style. I like Gosling, I love Cranston, I like noir, I like LA, I like action, I like the 80s, I like arthouse, I like character development, I like subtlety in filmmaking. But that doesn’t mean I’m a sucker who mistakes portentous, affected filmmaking for great art.

I go into movies open-minded and I want filmmakers to succeed in telling great stories that make us think and feel. But this left me cold.

Posted by: SweetValleyGuy at November 1, 2011 2:42 AM