free counter with statistics Delgo Review | Scathing Reviews for Bitchy People

delgo3.jpg

More Is Less, Bitches

Delgo / Agent Bedhead

Film Reviews | December 15, 2008 | Comments (32)


Dear Collective Animation Genre Filmmakers,

Lately, you seem to have backed your asses into a fine mess and, with the exception of Pixar and DreamWorks flicks, you’re pretty much fucked over a splintery barrel. Now, I love me some indie films just as much as that hipster in the next cubicle next, but with animation, you gotta be slick, ya dig? You see, when you have a primary audience of children, they’re basically gonna like everything they see, but the parents… don’t fuck with the parents. When these films hit the DVD shelves in time for Christmas, these parents have the power to choose which films they’d least mind repeatedly suffering through and tolerating as background noise as they attempt to review future piles of cinematic crap. So, with that in mind, here is a list, ranked in order of importance, of what actually matters in an animated film:

I. Story: It’s a damn shame that this even has to be said, but, on a budget of $40 million, a film should contain a coherent story that is somewhat original and not a mere amalgamation of whatever novels, films, or plays that screenwriters consider to be totally badass on any given day. Furthermore, since these writers’ tastes are constantly subject to change, a film that’s in production for a decade will necessarily start to show signs of multiple personality disorder. In that regard, Delgo is sort of like the Chinese Democracy of animation. This film has been gestating for so damn long that it doesn’t know what genre—Animation, Family, Sci-Fi, Romcom, Adventure—it belongs within, so little hope remains for a coherent story. Further adding to the confusion are the paw marks of two directors (Marc F. Adler, Jason Maurer) and the smeared ink of six writers (story by Marc F. Adler, Scott Biear, and Jason Maurer; screenplay by Patrick J. Cowan, Carl Dream, and Jennifer A. Jones), all of whom are equally culpable for this mess.

So, Delgo comes across as J.R. Tolkein meets Romeo and Juliet meets The Clone Wars meets Lord of the Rings meets Garfield: A Tail of Two Kitties meets intergalactic space opera (not exactly in manner of L. Ron Hubbard, but almost as cringeworthy). Of course, there’s absolutely nothing wrong with being derivative. Hell, just about every filmmaker pays homage to one or more of their cinematic idols, but that’s not all that they do. Homage should be a mere ingredient of a writer’s own recipe, and, unfortunately, Delgo’s menu is more likely to encourage projectile vomiting than repeat visits to anywhere but the nearest restroom.

II. Animation: Contemporary animation has progressed so quickly in recent times that dropping the ball is simply inexcusable. Again, the long gestation period of Delgo pretty much kills its chances of being taken seriously here. The characters of Delgo shuffle about in the most stilted of manners that is rather reminiscent of Atari visuals. Hey, you know what should have happened to Delgo? Uwe Motherfucking Boll. Yes, that’s right, and I’ve never wished such an ex post facto atrocity upon a film, but this one seems like it would have actually benefitted a wee bit from Boll’s, uh, touch. At the very least, Boll would have properly run this motherfucker into the ground and prevented it from taking up the space of 2000 theaters on opening weekend. Call it a mercy killing, if you will.

III. Audio: This one is pretty damn simple, but Delgo commits such an epic fail on this point that it deserves its own category. Listen up—it is very important to synchronize the audio track with its video counterpart. Otherwise, the animation runs the risk of looking like a dubbed kung-fu film, which can generally get away with such kitschy awfulness. You, however, cannot do so.

IV. Cast: Contrary to most studios’ practices, a list of familiar names is not the most important factor in an animated film’s success. It isn’t, I repeat, it is not enough to just have a cast that brings name recognition to the promotional posters and film premieres. As an all-too-willing example, here is a brief recap of Delgo’s overcomplicated plot: An ongoing civil war plagues the land of Jhamora. It’s a throwdown, bitches, between the Nohrin, a winged species, and the Lockni, who are otherworldly (read: allegorical) beings. Naturally, in the midst of it all, Delgo (Freddie Prinze Jr.), a tempestuous teenage Lockni, swears hatred against the Nohrin, that is, until he meets the Lockni Princess Kyla (Jennifer Love Hewitt). These two star-crossed lovers stare longingly into each other’s eyes until they become mere pawns for the evil Sedessa (the late Anne Bancroft), who has somehow become Jhamora’s leader despite her banishment by the Nohrin, thanks in part to Raius (Malcolm McDowell), a pussy-whipped warmonger. As part of the needlessly complex precursor to battle, Sedessa has Kyla kidnapped, which spurs on Delgo and his posse, Filo (Chris Kattan) and Bogardus (Val Kilmer), to rescue the pathetic damsel in distress. In addition, Michael Clarke Duncan (continuing his uncanny presence in children’s cinema), appears as an Obi-Wan Kenobi figure tasked with training Delgo. The pulsing stones are just too much to mention, and if the audience isn’t interested yet, then the voices of Kelly Ripa, Eric Idle, Louis Gossett Jr., and Burt Reynolds aren’t going to help much either.

Well, I hope this list clears things up a bit for the animated filmmakers in the audience. Please refer to the Ikea instructions on this topic if you have any questions. Otherwise, go fuck yourselves…. oh wait, you’ve already done that.

Best Wishes,
Agent Bedhead

Agent Bedhead (a.k.a. “Kimberly”) lives in Tulsa, Oklahoma. She and her little black heart can be found at agentbedhead.com.


Pajiba Love 12/15/08 | X-Men Origins Wolverine Trailer



Comments

Good review. Bookends nicely with the weekend I spent watching the WALL-E 'making of' features.

Posted by: twig at December 15, 2008 2:09 PM

Freddie Prinze and J-Lo-Hew? Chris Kattan? Good god, it's the stuff of nightmares.

Hold me...

Posted by: TK at December 15, 2008 2:10 PM

I don't understand why you like Dreamworks so much. So Kung Fu Panda was watchable, that doesn't make them a worthwhile animation studio. Pixar is the only animated movie studio with any real integrity, but I haven't given up praying for Disney to fix itself and make good movies again.

Posted by: Lucas at December 15, 2008 2:12 PM

How the fuck did Freddy Prince Jr. get such a hot wife. And Barcroft's been dead for years, this movie really has had a long gestation.

Posted by: George at December 15, 2008 2:15 PM

Oh, I've got your pulsing stones right here.

Posted by: Sabrina at December 15, 2008 2:27 PM

Holy fuck...I've never seen such an orgy of names in an animated movie...it's like they were hemorrhaging money in an attempt to stop up the leak of utter suck.

And did these people really need to whore themselves out for that kind of money? I mean, maybe Chris Kattan and Burt Reynolds...

Posted by: Shadows of Dakaron at December 15, 2008 2:33 PM

Where do the evil Skeksis fit in?

Oh wait, no Muppets. Nevermind. The picture in the heading threw me off.

Posted by: BWeaves at December 15, 2008 2:42 PM

Don't ALL animated fantasy movies like this one have overly complicated plots?

"An ongoing civil war plagues the land of Jhamora."

And just like that, I'm already exhausted.

Posted by: bucdaddy at December 15, 2008 3:11 PM

I had somehow never heard of this movie before this review and, like BWeaves, thought it was some kind of Muppet movie. That guy in the heading looks like a minty fresh version of the crazy head-throwing muppets from Labyrinth.

Posted by: Phaeolus at December 15, 2008 3:19 PM

Actually, I thought they looked like the crazy head-throwing Muppets from The Dark Crystal. Hence, my Skeksis comment.

Posted by: BWeaves at December 15, 2008 3:21 PM

The word "Bogardus" just makes me think of Adventures of Sebastian Cole, a movie I cherished back when everyone was still licking Freddie Prinze Jr.'s trainers, while I found a raging crush on the then-sufferable skinny little floppy-haired Adrian Grenier. That pout could stop traffic.

Pajiba- find that flick and review it. It's got transgender themes, so it's "last year" enough to be "ironically cool, I guess" and the 80's soundtrack is lush. Blank Generation, anyone?

Posted by: Sweetie Darling at December 15, 2008 3:29 PM

Dear Collective Pajiba Reviewers,

Lately, you seem to have backed your asses into a fine mess and, with the exception of Daniel Carlson and Dustin Rowles, you're pretty much fucked over the splintery barrel of pretention and unfunny. I'll write some untrue generalizations of the masses here, but then I'll also sprinkle them throughout my comment. I want to let you know this here, because I would hate for you to form an opinion without my totally quirky, snarky attitude influencing it. So with that in mind, here's a list, ranked in order of importance, of what actually matters in a review:

I. Summary: Oh, hey, that's totally awesome and funny and original that you wait until nearly the last paragraph of the review to actually tell us what the movie's about, because it was absolutely smothered in your attempts to present the review as something totally awesome and funny and original. It's nice to know how you actually state that this movie opened on 2,000 screens in the country. Because that's how many theaters and market avenues there are, right? I wouldn't possibly be in the dark as to why you're nerdraging so hard over the fact that this movie had a shelf life of a year, and was allowed to sit there and grow fungus like an unintentional science project.

II. Research: Honestly, is it that hard to Google "guy who wrote Lord of the Rings" or "Tolkien"? (You got the last name right -- oh, wait, no you didn't! -- so here it is: J.R.R. Tolkien.) I did just that to make this section, and his Wikipedia page was the first thing to pop up. I'm sure even writing "Tolkein" would've brought something up, like maybe a "Did you mean Tolkien?" link from helpful Google.

III. Unintentional Comedy: Really, I should not be chuckling over something that wasn't meant to be funny, like how you're complaining about coherency with a sentence like: It's a damn shame that this even has to be said, but, on a budget of $40 million, a film contain a coherent story that is somewhat original and not a mere amalgamation of whatever novels, films, or plays that screenwriters consider to be totally badass on any given day.

IV. Uwe Boll: See point I. about "totally awesome and funny and original."

V. Feminine Toughness: Yes, darling, I think we all get it that you're a girl who's not going to go quietly by the wayside like a fat girl's Easy-Bake Oven with a burnt-out lightbulb. Look at you here on a man's website, writing a review all by your big baby girl self! In case I was mistaken, though, I'm glad you told us all to go fuck ourselves in the end, then add (as if it was really an afterthought) the presumed fact that we've already done that. Like the fact you drew the shortest straw or were first to lose in the company circle-jerk (or however reviews are assigned) really makes you angry and is somehow our fault, and you just need the whole world to hear you roar! Yes, we get it.

Posted by: duckandcover at December 15, 2008 3:51 PM

Oh no he/she din't!

DAYUM!

Posted by: WhoWhatWhere at December 15, 2008 4:07 PM

AB, just in case you ever happen to meet Brad Bird, i advise you to refrain from uttering the words animation and genre in the same sentence, or he might punch you in the face (and not completely unrightfully so).

Posted by: daniel at December 15, 2008 4:32 PM

Duckandcover...

I don't agree with 75% of what is said around here, but I did take notice of the fact this place is touted as being "Scathing reviews for bitchy people." Maybe you're a regular around here and I never noticed. But you sure sound like a more literate-than-normal troll.

Don't you suspect that means there is going to be more than a little pretention and snark in these posts?

I mean, did you have an investment in this movie...because you sure seem pissed off at the review for some unindentifiable reason.

Posted by: Deacon Blue at December 15, 2008 5:03 PM

AB it would be totally awesome if you decided to kick duckandcover's ass for him making fun of you in this way (and it was actually quite funny reading both reviews side by side). This animation mess of a movie sounds like they were indeed hemorraging to make money but sacrified the quality for all the semi-famous people in it. Honestly, Freddie Prinze Jr? I didn't even know he was still an actor, just somebody married to Sarah Michelle Gellar (and the only reason I know that is because of my nerdette crush on Buffy reruns!)Chris Kattan is TOTAL blasphemy and I suppose Val is so ashamed of his dwindling looks that he decided to sign up for this crapfest.

Posted by: ph at December 15, 2008 5:13 PM

Posted by: Deacon Blue at December 15, 2008 5:03 PM

I've been reading this site for about .. three, four years now? Somewhere around that timeline. I also am an infrequent commenter, which is probably why you've never noticed me. (What does that say about me that I'm taking your "more literate-than-normal troll" as a sideways compliment? Or did you actually mean it to be a compliment?)

Oh, I'm sure there will be pretention and snark in each post made, but as the website touts, it's "Scathing Reviews for Bitchy People." I'm just a piss in the vast ocean of the target audience, and it's somewhat disconcerting that my post (while somewhat over-the-top itself) has garnered mostly "HURRR AB U SHOULD KICK HIS ASS" reply and a literal (albeit amusing) "OH NO S/HE DIN'T" comment. I'm more pissed off at the growing lack of actual reviews and opinions as they're replaced with pseudo-intellectual attempts to inject political and social commentary (anyone remember the dreadful review that was basically -- correct me if I'm wrong -- DR saying America's fat Wal-Mart goers and little else? While it was meant to be sarcastic, it started the ball rolling on my "Give us the fucking review and go about your business" attitude). I, of course, contribute to the vicious cycle that is producing a work for the public to have it mangled by some no-name on the Internet, who in turn will mangle my work, who in turn .. you get what I'm saying.

Also, for the record, I did not have a financial, emotional, or any sort of investment in this movie. If I did, would I really be hiding behind an Internet moniker? I was also not endorsing the movie nor defending it in any way. I was merely critiquing AB's review form. Her points were valid and no doubt I would've been reaching for perhaps the exact words that she's laid down here.

AB it would be totally awesome if you decided to kick duckandcover's ass for him making fun of you in this way (and it was actually quite funny reading both reviews side by side).

Hey, brah, after she does that, brah, you guys should like, go out and get some beers, brah. I think, brah, it would totally awesome, brah.

Posted by: duckandcover at December 15, 2008 5:47 PM

tl;dr

Posted by: ChrisD at December 15, 2008 6:09 PM

In case I was mistaken, though, I'm glad you told us all to go fuck ourselves in the end, then add (as if it was really an afterthought) the presumed fact that we've already done that

Um, unless you are one of the said animated filmmakers she addressed with the line to which you refer, I am not seeing how you can take such personal offense to that.

As far as the rest of your complaints, well, they have certainly been raised before. Some better, some worse. You have every right to feel that way. Just like AB has every right to ignore your little tirade.

True, she wrote a technically flawed review with a somewhat overwrought gimmick, for a film that seems to not deserve such attention. Then again, the same could be said for your quite pedestrian attempt at a sarcastic and intentionally incendiary response.

And you might want to look into this issue you have with females writing posts here or anywhere, good fellow. And I say that regardless of your actual gender or number of female associates you claim. I just don't see how her being female has anything to do with her abilities to review or her assignment, which you seem to indicate. It seems disingenuous to you point about critiquing her form with such a slam directed at her gender.

Posted by: Vermillion at December 15, 2008 8:21 PM

Maybe I'm just old-fashioned, but I prefer either gender to present themselves with some dignity and I see all too often women simply lowering themselves to cariactures of "tough guys" to make it in the world. I'm not saying she has to be Marcia Brady, but come on. A movie review ending with something along the lines of "go fuck yourselves," regardless of who or what it's aimed at? Can we just say lazy writing and call it a day or what? Instead of the pompous bloat, she should've just written in size 72 font "THIS MOVIE STUNK."

And while I'm not one of the animators, I am pursuing a degree in the area. If you think it's painful to watch, try scraping an entire project just to start it all over again and come out with something even worse than what was there to begin with. Sometimes, you'd rather just push forward with what you've already spent perhaps months or years on.

There's something not right about your comment on my ambiguous gender, but I can't put my finger on it at the moment. I'm sure it'll come to me later.

Posted by: duckandcover at December 15, 2008 8:40 PM

Maybe I'm just old-fashioned, but I prefer either gender to present themselves with some dignity and I see all too often women simply lowering themselves to cariactures of "tough guys" to make it in the world.

And I am not seeing how her using such a phrase is supposedly an attempt to be perceived as "tough". Why is that even considered? Is it not possible that AB, as a human being, really feels that such language is warranted? Is it not possible that a woman might actually WANT to say the word "fuck"?

For someone who claims to be a long-time reader of this site, this particular complaint is quite confusing. True, Dustin and Prisco tend towards the more offensive and scatological in their work, but then you have others like RanyIt (also a female) and Phillip with more nuanced and thought out analysis. So there is no reason for AB to feel like she has to swear to fit in here; she just said it because, believe it or not, she wants the people responsible for this film to fuck themselves.

Maybe you are "just old-fashioned", but that still isn't an excuse. You called into question her ability to write a review based on this strange notion her being a woman trying to be a "tough guy", all stemming from one throwaway line that wasn't even directed to you. That is ridiculously unfair, wholly inappropriate, and worst of all, completely wrong. She has no need for such validation, and as a friend and associate, I do take umbrage when someone derides her (or anyone else) based on some faulty supposition.

And as far as my comment on your gender: There have been many a time when people, when confronted with accusations of being somewhat sexist, immediately declare the impossibility of such a notion due to their having male/female friends or being the particular gender themselves. My statement was made to simply negate such an automatic defense.

Posted by: Vermillion at December 15, 2008 8:58 PM

Wow, it's like coming over for a dinner party and walked in on my friends fighting and throwing shit at each other ... AWWWK-WARD.

Posted by: A Bowl of Stupid at December 15, 2008 9:29 PM

Nothing says a cry for objective film commentary like generalizing the entire Pajiba population as hipster douchebags, "brah."

Posted by: Robert at December 15, 2008 10:31 PM

It misspelled "pretension". Glass houses.

Posted by: Jay at December 16, 2008 10:41 AM

Duck - I'm a woman and this site gave me an EE win for quite excessive use of 'tough' verbiage. In defense of some pretty inexplicable ranting at a female staff member...If I may quote that total asshat from the black eyed peas: where is the love? (lately).

Posted by: replica at December 16, 2008 2:28 PM

duck I was actually quite amused by your comment. ass kickin' deserves some encouragement and is always fun to observe, verbally of course! if you want more bitchiness and less "brahness" maybe you should read The Economist or something?

Posted by: ph at December 16, 2008 4:46 PM

Wait, I have one for duck:

Go fuck yourself.

The end.

Posted by: abby at December 16, 2008 8:57 PM

Well, aren't you the lovely ones.

Funny how duck here gets labeled a troll for commenting a review like this. While I can agree on some of ABs arguments, in the end she ends up looking like the green goblin - damn ugly and throwing harmful shit at the world in general and its granny.

Communication is a craft - reviews dripping with sarcasm can be smooth and elegant, or it can be - this. I prefer the former.

Posted by: GRR at December 17, 2008 7:02 AM

I didnt even see it. And I am so creeped out.

I am surley going to have nighmares.
And c'mon Freddy Prince Jr? Funny when I first herd his name I thought he was black.
Anywho this is a flop like that other creepy "film" Egor.

Posted by: Loveley at December 17, 2008 8:19 PM

Wow, so someone actually went to see Delgo.

Posted by: Starcasm at December 22, 2008 12:19 AM

ChrisD--seconded.

My eyes skimmed, but all my brain registered was "BAAAAWW! (something akin to having the unexplainable need to argue on the internet and being completely butthurt over nothing) WAAAAHHH!"

Posted by: marty at December 22, 2008 5:17 PM

15 seconds into the trailer I could tell this was a major POS. If you're not going to do the legwork that Pixar or Disney does prior to production, you might as well not even try. 3D looks like an easy option, but it is an unforgiving medium.

Posted by: Protoguy at December 23, 2008 2:13 PM