free counter with statistics Deja Vu | Pajiba - Scathing Reviews for Bitchy People

dejavu.jpg


Right Now I’m Having Amnesia and Déjà Vu at the Same Time

Déjà Vu/ Dustin Rowles

Film Reviews | November 22, 2006 | Comments (36)


Honestly, I’ve never met a Denzel Washington flick that I couldn’t watch. The man has signed on to damn near as many clunkers (The Preacher’s Wife, The Manchurian Candidate) as he has remarkable films (Philadelphia, The Hurricane) but he’s never made anything so godawful wretched that his own presence couldn’t string a viewer along from opening to end credits. And there have been plenty of other films that he’s managed, single-handedly, to elevate from mediocre to the cusp of brilliance — He Got Game, Training Day, and Out of Time, to name a few.

With Déjà Vu, Washington is once again asked to lend that indelible screen presence to an otherwise unremarkable, far-fetched, almost silly Tony Scott flick, as he was asked to do with Man on Fire. And once again, Washington is the film’s only saving grace, injecting his charisma and gravitas into a silly adolescent cop/sci-fi fantasy.

With Déjà Vu, Washington is once again asked to lend that indelible screen presence to an otherwise unremarkable, far-fetched, almost silly Tony Scott flick, as he was asked to do with Man on Fire. And once again, Washington is the film’s only saving grace, injecting his charisma and gravitas into a silly adolescent cop/sci-fi fantasy.

Déjà Vu opens out in the Gulf of Mexico, a few hundred yards off the Louisiana shore, where a New Orleans ferry explodes into a scorching ball of fire, killing 543 people. It’s a classic Bruckheimer/Tony Scott explosion — close-ups of dolls, smiling old folks, and yawning children seconds before their fiery demise — and, fortunately, only one of a few such moments in the film.

Enter ATF Agent Doug Carlin (Washington), one of those “CSI” master-of-the-obvious crime-scene investigators, the kind of guy who can astutely deduce that the only place to find explosive residue on a rainy day out in the ocean would be a nearby covered bridge. While investigating the crime scene, he gets a phone call from the coroner’s office and discovers another woman, Claire (Paula Patton), has burned to death and been found on a nearby shore; only her time of death is placed two hours before the ferry explosion. After the autopsy, Carlin decides that her death is linked to the bombing, and turns his attention to Claire’s murder to discover the terrorist behind both crimes.

He’s helped along by a newfangled, super-duper-secret government unit headed up by Agent Pryzwarra (Val Kilmer), who really likes Carlin’s crime-scene skills. So, he’s brought into the unit, which uses a special program called Snow White, which has the ability to conduct continuous audio/video surveillance on any point, so long as that point is exactly four days and six hours ago. In other words, Carlin et al. conduct a stakeout on the past, focusing the bulk of their attention on Claire’s life. They manage this Emmett-Brownian feat through the fluke discovery of a break in the space-time continuum, which allows them to look back 102 hours. The geeky operative, Denny (Adam Goldberg, who has seemingly built a career on geeky operative roles) explains the “folding of time” involved, using some sort of Jessica Simpson understanding of physics, which was still a little over my head. I’m guessing, however, that it’s mostly bullshit.

Anyway, Carlin also discovers that he can manipulate the past, which he’s gangbusters about since he not only wants to stop the re-imminent destruction of the ferry, but he’s also developed quite the hard-on for Claire. Thus, the Quantum Leaping, the fate/destiny arguments, and the absurd car chases ensue, which inevitably leads them to the crazy, right-wing nut-job, Carroll Oerstadt (Jim Caveziel — and seriously, Caveziel, I question your decision to follow up your portrayal of Jesus with a Timothy McVeigh wacko; the message you’re sending is kinda creepy). It’s pretty much at that point that things turn from the ridiculous to the outright preposterous — the already flimsy logic crumbles, the plot holes widen, and the whole production turns into a blow-‘em-up version of Sandra Bullock’s Lake House.

But that, folks, is why Denzel Washington is paid the scads and scads of dollars — to make you forget about the fact that you’re watching cinematic lunacy. And hell if the man can’t pull off even this Bruckheimerian feat. He’s like the “thinking man’s” action hero, though even that might be a misnomer, since even his action pics don’t require much thought. But with Washington along, at least you feel like you’re thinking, while you’re half-comatose and drooling into your popcorn tub. Seriously, Déjà vu never would’ve worked without him. I suspect it had the potential to be just another Paul Walker/Vin Diesel film, in which case the same narrative, the same supporting cast, and the same director would’ve fallen on flat on their asses.

Nevertheless, it’s hard not to be a little disappointed — not in the film, which still only manages to rise to the level of a mindless but infinitely watchable action flick (and only that if you allow yourself to get sucked into its illogicality), but in Washington. Looking over the past several years of his work, he’s basically the acting equivalent of Kobe Bryant Steve Nash being asked to deliver the same wide-open six-foot jumper over and over again. Sure, he’s going to hit it every goddamn time, but wouldn’t it be nice to see the man dunk it every once in a while, or at least shoot a three from half-court. I’m just saying: I’d like it if Washington took on material that lived up to his talent, something — I’d argue — he’s only done four times in his lengthy career: Glory, Philadelphia, Malcolm X, and The Hurricane.The way it’s going lately, however, it’s Washington’s acting career that’s in a constant state of déjà vu. (Jesus — I feel like I just stole that last line from Joel Seigel; quick, someone shoot me in the head before I give rise to an entire zombie community.)

Dustin Rowles is the publisher of Pajiba. He is currently halfway through a three-year ‘sentence’ in upstate, NY, where he lives with his wife. You may email him, or leave a comment below.


Fountain, The | Deck the Halls



Comments

Did you purposely repeat that 2nd paragraph - just to match the film's annoying ads?

Posted by: MsG at November 22, 2006 5:29 PM

Did you purposely repeat that 2nd paragraph - just to match the film's annoying ads?

Posted by: MsG at November 22, 2006 5:29 PM

DR please anyone BUT kobe the snitch, LA phoney, overhyped, phoney, rapist,ballhog, gunner!michael jordan want a be!! denzel earns his money, kobe is stealing from buss everyday.

Posted by: pasadenamike at November 22, 2006 7:49 PM

Might I introduce you to zombiedefense.org, in the event that Mr. Rowles does spawn a zombie community. And for what it is worth, if you are a zombie Dustin, I will perform FTD. It is a show of respect, really.

As far as the movie goes, Denzel Washington is worth the price of admission alone. So there go my ten bucks.

Posted by: ScarletKnight at November 22, 2006 7:50 PM

I have a feeling this comment section is going to get out of hand (out of hand) quickly.

Posted by: Mat at November 22, 2006 7:55 PM

I have a nitpick with the trailers at least; deja vu is the feeling that you have experienced the situation you are in, at another time (wiki says, "a new situation previously"); a feeling that is not evoked by seeing something and then seeing it again two seconds later. That might be a glitch in the Matrix, but it's not deja vu.

Posted by: zara at November 22, 2006 9:10 PM

Thank you, Dustin, for quantifying the reason why I cannot turn the channel when Remember the Titans or Virtuousity comes on. And thanks also fornot comparing him to Kobe. Denzel deserves better.

zara, that little fact bugged me for the longest after learning about this movie. It is usually a bad sign when the title of your movie is a plot hole. If he was repeating the same day, or they could see 4 days into the future, then the title would make more sense.

Against my better judgment, I am going to try to reconcile the title to the premise. Denzel and Co. can see things that are new to them, but have already happened. Wait, brain cramp. I have to lie down.

Posted by: Vermillion at November 22, 2006 10:47 PM

Show me a man who's never met a Denzel Washington flick he couldn't watch, and I'll show you a man who's never seen Virtuosity.

Posted by: j29 at November 23, 2006 2:49 PM

I really don't understand the Denzel Washington ting. I specifically avoid movies with him because no matter what the role or script he is always dull and trite. I'd rather watch paint dry than Denzel Washington "act." He's at the top of my list for overrated actors.

Posted by: Squarah at November 23, 2006 3:03 PM

I have a feeling that this comment will show up twice. Will the second time be Déjà Vu?

Posted by: Simon Owens at November 23, 2006 10:02 PM

I have a feeling that this comment will show up twice. Will the second time be Déjà Vu?

Posted by: Simon Owens at November 23, 2006 10:02 PM

At least this movie reminds me of a sublime gag from Top Secret!:

"This is Deja Vu." "Have we not met before, sir?"

Posted by: Arran at November 23, 2006 11:58 PM

I think I've forgotten this before.

Oh Steven Wright.

Posted by: Tim at November 24, 2006 1:33 AM

Denzel is fun to look at and I agree with your assesment that he does make any POS movie he may be in passable somehow... however, he plays the same character in EVERY SINGLE MOVIE he's in. He's the black Tom Cruise. But so far, not crazy.

Posted by: courtney at November 25, 2006 8:19 AM

it takes a talented mofo to pack so much brilliance into one review. bravo!

Posted by: briana at November 25, 2006 12:51 PM

it takes a talented mofo to pack so much brilliance into one review. bravo!

Posted by: briana at November 25, 2006 12:52 PM

"But with Washington along, at least you feel like you're thinking, while you're half-comatose and drooling into your popcorn tub."

i couldn't agree more. for some reason, mr. washington makes us white folks feel like we're watching an "important" performance regardless of how asinine the storyline.

and this carries on with ALMOST every movie denzel is in. i was transfixed by "Out of Time" and then ran to the bathroom and stuck my finger in the back of my throat to make myself feel better about it. same goes with almost every movie denzel has been in (although i did quite enjoy "man of fire" and "training day".

but "virtuosity"...well, color me disgusted.

and i will be a part of any zombie community, regardless of whether dustin is the impetus or not...

Posted by: idiot dentist at November 26, 2006 1:33 AM

I don't know, I feel like Denzel's lack of range has more to do with the dearth of roles available to black men than with his skill level.

Posted by: Samantha T at November 26, 2006 2:05 PM

I agree with Samantha T's comment. The majority of roles available to black men do seem to me (and not that I'm really keeping a tally) to be those dealing with race issues. If they aren't dealing with race issues, I think there's somewhere in the subconscious of whoever writes them the need to validate the black hero by making him overly assertive, smart, serious, etc. Whether it's the fault of the actor or the director that this monotonous trend continues in every movie is hard to say.

I don't think I've ever seen one of those "quirky" roles fulfilled by a black man, unless you count Cuba Gooding, Jr. in Radio (which I don't). I guess it's hard enough for an audience to accept a character that's too different from the norm; making him black is just too much to handle. Sad, I know. But I don't think there's any doubt that Denzel is playing to a mainstream audience.

Posted by: Diana at November 27, 2006 1:58 PM

I agree with Samantha T's comment. The majority of roles available to black men do seem to me (and not that I'm really keeping a tally) to be those dealing with race issues. If they aren't dealing with race issues, I think there's somewhere in the subconscious of whoever writes them the need to validate the black hero by making him overly assertive, smart, serious, etc. Whether it's the fault of the actor or the director that this monotonous trend continues in every movie is hard to say.

I don't think I've ever seen one of those "quirky" roles filled by a black man, unless you count Cuba Gooding, Jr. in Radio (which I don't). I guess it's hard enough for an audience to accept a character that's too different from the norm; making him black is just too much to handle. Sad, I know. But I don't think there's any doubt that Denzel is playing to a mainstream audience.

Posted by: Diana at November 27, 2006 1:59 PM

Bravo, Dustin, for being a secure enough man to acknowledge the magnetic force that is Denzel. I see all of his movies so that I don't get kicked out of the club.

I too agree with Samantha T. It's so sad that Hollywood broke both its arms patting itself on the back for the "progress" it had made when both Denzel and Halle won Oscars, then only offers the shittiest roles possible to these two admittedly talented actors. Not to mention, out of all of his roles, Denzel won for Training Day????? Yeah, that role broke a lot of steroptypes!

Posted by: MaiGirl at November 27, 2006 3:28 PM

Bravo, Dustin, for being a secure enough man to acknowledge the magnetic force that is Denzel. I see all of his movies so that I don't get kicked out of the club.

I too agree with Samantha T. It's so sad that Hollywood broke both its arms patting itself on the back for the "progress" it had made when both Denzel and Halle won Oscars, then only offers the shittiest roles possible to these two admittedly talented actors. Not to mention, out of all of his roles, Denzel won for Training Day????? Yeah, that role broke a lot of steroptypes. Bravo, Hollywood!

Posted by: MaiGirl at November 27, 2006 3:29 PM

Denzel Washington is incredibly over-rated; I've never understood why people like him so much. I agree with the previous comment that Denzel is the black Tom Cruise. Then again, many allegedly good actors give us the same character over and over: Clint Eastwood, Tommy Lee Jones, Harrison Ford, Tom Hanks, etc. Boring and over-rated, the lot of them. They all have the range of a toothpick.


But for Denzel, you can't blame a lack of good Hollywood roles for black men for Denzel's lack of acting range: look at Don Cheadle who has infused all his characters with complexity and passion, no matter how small the part. Also, he's made good films. No clunkers come to my mind.


Also -- Denzel is a racist! He refuses to play characters that have romantic involvements with white actresses. He even refused to kiss Julia Roberts in The Pelican Brief, even though the script called for it. Can you imagine what outrage would ensue if a white actor refused to kiss a black actress, based just on her race? Why aren't more people disturbed by Denzel's offensive position on this issue?

Posted by: Kimbo at November 27, 2006 4:25 PM

Kimbo - I was under the impression that Denzel refused to kiss Julia Roberts (and Kelly Lynch, in another movie) because he didn't want to get embroiled in all of the stereotypes that accompany a black man being sexual with a white woman. I also thought the scene wasn't in the original version. Also, he has kissed white women in other movies. Has anybody else heard otherwise?

Don Cheadle is, to be sure, a fabulous actor. That said, he's really more of an indie actor than Denzel Washington, so I stand by my contention that black men (and women) have very limited choices in mainstream movies.

Posted by: Samantha T at November 27, 2006 6:35 PM

Denzel's role in Pelican Brief was originally portrayed as a white man in the book. So he doesn't always play a "Black Man" in my opinion. I think he plays an "Everyman." And I am white....

Posted by: derekthered at November 28, 2006 9:15 PM

Who didn't get a hint Washington would have a career like this when he was still roaming the halls at St. Elsewhere?

And yes...I think one of the biggest reasons he appeals to all us white folk is because so many of his roles (OK....probably not Malcolm X or Reuben Carter..LOL) are NOT the the basic "Hollywood black guy" role, written in expressly because they either felt the plot needed a black stereotype at that point or because they wanted a black presence to widen the film's demographic appeal. So many of his roles are essentially color-blind roles which could have been just as easily been cast with a white actor.

I admit I've probably also got a soft spot for him because Deja Vu marks his second film shot at least in part here in New Orleans, and he's seemed to comport himself like a regular guy while down here, including just grabbing a bicycle and peddling out to see the neighborhood where the 17th Street Canal breach occured (I know some folks with a gutted-out home nearby that just happened to see Denzel Washington ride a bike down their block..LOL) rather than arranging for some of the press to record his righteous indignation, like so many others have. By the way, the ferry is in the Mississippi River, not the Gulf of Mexico..the Gulf's some 30 miles or so from NOLA. Although it's getting closer all the time (coastal erosion) and will be at our back door if something isn't done NOW (off-shore royalty sharing).

Posted by: Puddinhead at November 30, 2006 8:09 AM

Man On Fire is an utterly awful movie, the worst of Scott's spotty list (or, at least, it was until Domino - that promptly topped the list). It's loud, frantic, bombastic, over saturated, poorly written and cloying.

And I've seen it five times. Because Denzel is fucking amazing in it. Pisses me off.

And note to Pajiba editors - I know some of the posters are doing the double post thing for ha-ha's, but there is something goofy about your comment sections. It's showing up all over the place, probably due to the lag time after hitting the "post button".

Posted by: TK at November 30, 2006 12:18 PM

I show my students Kenneth Branagh's "Much Ado About Nothing" every year, and they're always surprised to see Denzel Washington do Shakespeare. They're pretty honest about expecting to see white actors do Shakespeare, especially since his character's brother in the film is played by Keanu Reeves, but they get over it quickly when they see the caliber of his work. It's a small part but he brings (if this makes any sense) a kind of sweet gravitas to the role that is, well, magnetic. Keanu Reeves, on the other hand, is simply AWFUL when speaking, although his over-the-top sneer is just perfect for the stock villian he plays. Oh I just love this movie. You all should check it out. It even features a pre-plastic surgery Kate Beckinsale! (She used to be so cute.)

Posted by: AM at December 1, 2006 4:09 PM

Actually the film opened in the Mississippi river, not the Gulf of Mexico.

I enjoyed it. I've decided that with "time travel" movies I will think for approximately 2 minutes after the movie to figure it out then give up and decide if I had fun or not watching it. And I enjoyed this one. I will watch anything with Denzel. He's basically a younger Morgan Freeman who I also love.

And they didn't manipulate the Katrina situation which, as a New Orleans resident, made me VERY happy.

Posted by: Michelle at December 2, 2006 12:34 AM

Ooooops... didnt see Puddinhead's correction on the Mississippi river. My bad!

Posted by: Michelle at December 2, 2006 12:36 AM

AM, 'Much Ado' is one of my favorite movies, and I have to say that Denzel MAKES that movie. Who can't be overwhelmed with his proposal to Emma's character (in its subtle honesty and awe of her amazing persona)? I think it just serves to show how "kingly" he comes across in all of his movies. No matter if he seems to be repeating the same character in various roles, he has that certain *something* that makes him undeniably watchable. Even in shit like The Bone Collector.
Worst. Movie. Ever.

Posted by: Britt at December 4, 2006 1:46 PM

Oh, and to add to the 'Much Ado' discussion, two words: Michael Keaton.

Cynics beware!

Posted by: Britt at December 4, 2006 1:47 PM

I confess to thoroughly enjoying this film, up to a point (towards the end, the plot holes were a bit too wide to successfully get across). This may or may not be because Scott reigns it in slightly... while comparisons to Enemy Of The State are obvious, I was reminded more of Minority Report in the way it was shot.

Does one get bonus nerd points for spotting that Scott lifted a death scene straight from his own The Last Boy Scout?

Posted by: craig at January 25, 2007 4:25 AM

"The geeky operative, Denny explains the 'folding of time' involved, using some sort of Jessica Simpson understanding of physics, which was still a little over my head. I'm guessing, however, that it's mostly bullshit."

Being a "geek operative" myself, I can tell you the theory is mostly correct, even if pictured in a very trivial manner. The practical side of things, on the other hands, are resumed to "Look, we managed to find it by accident, ok?".

This movie was downright offensive, and no, there was no Denzel Washington to save it. The agent could actually be the lovechild of Hannibal Lecter and Steve McQueen, and the movie would still suck like an olympic pool drain.

Posted by: Gargumma at March 24, 2007 2:48 AM

Did you purposely repeat that 2nd paragraph - just to match the film's annoying ads?

Posted by: MsG at May 7, 2007 1:23 AM

i can't believe i'm defending bruckheimer, but...

this is actually the second review i've read where the reviewer didn't catch that the whole "snow white and the seven satellites" thing was a pretty obvious lie intended to hide the true nature of the project from washington's character (the other review is over at the onion av club).

i was laughing myself at all of the rotation and zooming that was going on at first (i also thought of the bullshit "enhance" moments in enemy of the state) but the wormhole explanation actually does allow for that sort of viewing.

*pushes glass up on nose and replaces calculator in hip pouch.

Posted by: sissyneck at June 2, 2007 1:40 AM