deck.jpg


No, Deck Anyone Who Asks You to Watch This Crap

Deck the Halls / Jeremy C. Fox

Film Reviews | November 24, 2006 | Comments (27)


As much as I try never to judge a movie by its genre, I find that it’s usually safe to assume that any time a movie is marketed by its studio as a “family comedy,” this will translate as “unmitigated shit.” Toss in a holiday theme and thus the requisite lessons to be learned about the true meaning of Christmas/Hanukkah/Ramadan/Administrative Professionals Day, and the chance that the movie will be a labored, unfunny pile of disingenuous moralizing nears 100 percent. Hire the director responsible for such cinematic abortions as Malibu’s Most Wanted and Big Momma’s House 2 and the screenwriter guilty of scripting both Big Momma’s House films, and its potential for quality drops several digits into the negative zone. Throw in a late-career Danny DeVito, and you’ll be lucky to escape the theater with any remnants of your will to live.

These are the sorry circumstances that have conspired to give us this year’s cinematic equivalent of the unwanted McDonald’s gift certificate, Deck the Halls. In this sad attempt at a movie, DeVito plays Buddy Hall (see, the title is a pun — how witty!), a boorish twit recently relocated with his family — slutty, pneumatic wife Tia (Kristin Chenoweth, best known for her Tony-nominated turn as Glinda the Good Witch in Wicked) and their slutty, inexplicably Amazonian twin daughters Ashley and Emily (Sabrina and Kelly Aldridge from the MTV series “8th & Ocean”) — to quaint Cloverdale, Massachusetts. The trashy Halls rent the house across the street from their social opposites, the uptight Finch family, which consists of optometrist Steven (Matthew Broderick), his cookbook-writer wife Kelly (Kristin Davis from “Sex and the City”), and their children Madison (Alia Shawkat from “Arrested Development,” slumming) and Carter (Dylan Blue). Steven is the kind of Type-A holiday planner who manages to schedule and nitpick all the fun out of his family’s celebration; he breaks out a Christmas-countdown calendar each December 1 and proceeds to ensure that each event is thoroughly regimented, predictable, and tedious, all in the name of maintaining family traditions. Buddy, conversely, lacks Steven’s knack for planning; he has spent his life looking for something important, something “monumental” that would allow him to make his mark in the world, and, idiotic family comedies being what they are, he naturally seizes on the idea of erecting the largest, most ghastly Christmas-light display he can concoct, one that can be seen from space.

What follows is a predictable series of confrontations in which Buddy, as the free-spirited, earthy type, naturally triumphs over the anal-retentive Steven, whose attempts to dominate any given situation inevitably lead to events spiraling out of his control in ways that are supposed to be hilarious but are alternately 1) merely uncomfortable or 2) thoroughly uninteresting. Watch Steven dragged across town in an out-of-control horse-drawn carriage and ultimately dumped into a frozen pond, watch him get covered in shit and then spit on by a camel, watch him speed-skate while wearing a humiliatingly snug skating suit, watch his Christmas trees go up in flames multiple times throughout the movie. None of this is ever funny, and what’s more, we just don’t care. Buddy and Steven are both predictable, paper-thin, totally unlikable stereotypes, and so are just about all the other characters in the film. The only performer here who shows any real energy or charm is Chenoweth, playing a character who comes off as a sanitized version of Amy Sedaris’ Jerri Blank. Maybe it’s just that Chenoweth is relatively underexposed, so that her shtick here seems far fresher from that of the other leads, each of whom is phoning in a role he or she has played a dozen times before. But whatever the reason, she’s the one person onscreen who seems not only to want to be there but to deserve the opportunity.

Aside from her performance, the movie is a combination of the entirely predictable and the pointlessly harebrained. The entire premise that Buddy’s goal is to have his house visible from space, of course, never makes any sense — the goal is to make their house show up on a Google Earth-type satellite system called MyEarth, on which the neighbors’ houses are already visible, yet they apparently have to light their house brighter than the sun to achieve the same, though there is no foliage blocking the view of their house nor any other reason given that it shouldn’t be as visible as other houses in the neighborhood. I can tell you that I’ve searched for my own home on Google Earth, and not only is it visible, but I can see squirrels playing in the gutters clearly enough to give them nicknames.

The family-film genre is supposed to tread that delicate line between being inoffensive enough for the kids and the grandparents while still having a few jokes that appeal to Mom and Dad, but here, as is so often the case, several chunks of the film are all wrong for the little ones — such as the implicit incestuousness when Buddy and Steven get all worked up over sexy dancers who turn out to be their teenaged daughters — while other parts — such as the shit and fart jokes — are such that no self-respecting person of any age should find them amusing. Undoubtedly there will be parents desperate enough for some family-friendly holiday-weekend viewing that Deck the Halls will rake in some dough — audiences have been turning out for dreck like The Santa Clause 3 fer chrissakes — but I’d imagine they’ll wind up feeling like much like Steven: covered in shit, spit on by a camel, and utterly regretting having ever stumbled out their doors.

Jeremy C. Fox is a founding critic of Pajiba and a member of the Online Film Critics Society.You may email him at jeremycfox[at]gmail.com.

ofcs.gif









Deja Vu | Bobby













Comments

Sigh. This is so sad. Everytime I look at Matthew Broderick, I just think "You were Ferris-fucking-Bueller!"

Well, as the snotty waiter said in that film:

"I weep for the future." So do I, my friend. So do I.

Posted by: Brie at November 24, 2006 10:23 PM

I keep thinking that 'Election' might just be Matthew Broderick's last great role. The only other film he's been in since then worth anything is 'You Can Count On Me.' Well, IMDB shows 5 films currently in the works for him so I guess we'll see. I am beyond tired of this crap though.

Posted by: stacy at November 25, 2006 2:31 AM

"Family Comedy". Ghostbusters is a family comedy. It's also brilliant, it can be done.

Posted by: nevin at November 25, 2006 6:52 AM

Thanks, Jeremy, for the deservedly scathing review on yet another piece of Christmas dreck.
The trailers alone have put me into a state of dispair. Christmas is the time for small films about people not extravaganzas full of creepiness. The last Cristmas film that I wholeheartedly enjoyed was 1984's A Christmas Story-a small film that was hilarious yet very real.

Posted by: djo at November 25, 2006 7:32 AM

Dear little Maeby, first a Lifetime made-for-tv movie, now this? Alia Shawkat needs a new agent, stat!

Posted by: groanygirl at November 25, 2006 8:21 AM

The thing that really gets me is that people actually waste money to watch these stupid movies. How fucking bored do you have to be to bring the family or watch these movies on your own? I'd rather go to the dentist, followed by a prostate exam, all while listening to an nsync christmas album in the car ride than sit through this movie. I am not even sure seeing the very cute Kristin Davis get it on with the Amazonian twins would make this movie worht seeing. I just wish people would stop wasting their money and providing studios with a profit off these movies.

Posted by: Dave at November 25, 2006 11:49 AM

ghostbusters is a family comedy?

wow i guess it doesn't have any dick or fart jokes or anything like that. i never thought of that as a family movie before strictly because it was funny, which as mr. fox has already covered, immediately disqualifies it as such. but i could see the argument there.

Posted by: the-ian at November 25, 2006 11:53 AM

Every time I see a commercial for this film, I immediately think, "Wait - didn't this come out last year? And the year before that? And the year before that, too?"

We never do much more than the tree, a wreath, and some lights on the railing outside, so I guess I'm missing the hilarity inherent in über-decorating for Christmas....

Posted by: Edith at November 25, 2006 12:07 PM

Yay Administrative Professionals Day! That was the best week at work out of the whole year. You must have had a desk calendar in front of you when you wrote this.

Posted by: Katy at November 25, 2006 1:37 PM

Anything this movie could possibly say was already told by National Lampoon's Christmas Vacation.

PS: That was NOT an endorsement of NLCV, just stating a fact.

Posted by: BarbaboSlim at November 25, 2006 5:26 PM

You make it sound like endorsing NLCV is a bad thing or something...

Posted by: Some guy at November 26, 2006 12:19 AM

Hehehehe, personally, I enjoy it every time I see it
but I know how some people feel about Chevy Chase and I wouldn't want to incur their wrath :)

Posted by: BarbaboSlim at November 26, 2006 12:22 PM

I'm tired of being asked to suspend my disbelief for two hours: on what planet would a cutie like Chenowith deign to even date DeVito? He is 24 years her damn senior, as well. I'm not saying that personality can't ever carry the day, but for God's sake the reverse gender pairing NEVER EVER happens. I want Kathy Bates paired in an unironic way with Jude frigging Law. Stat.

If she's supposed to be a trophy wife in the movie, please disregard this post. I don't want my will to live sapped by going to see this piece of shit.

Posted by: Samantha T at November 26, 2006 12:34 PM

I call it the "Whatever Can Go Wrong Will" genre.

The kind that makes me thoroughly uncomfortable, unhappy and bored, all simultaneously.

I don't watch them anymore, and thankfully, I can usually tell from the synopsis what it will be. Also a good clue: if it's a comedy and stars Ben Stiller, it will be a WCGWW movie. Yes, that includes There's Something About Mary -- throw stuff at me if you will, but that film made me want to leave the theatre 5 minutes into it. Same goes for Meet the Parents and Meet the Fockers and Along Came Polly... need I go on?

Posted by: Maryscott O'Connor at November 26, 2006 4:31 PM

Maryscott, I totally and completely agree with you. Movies like 'There's Something Like Mary' and 'Meet the Parents' drive me insane. Watching horrible (and usually annoying) things happen to the same character over and over and over again just doesn't amuse me. In fact, it makes me want to claw my eyes out.

Posted by: stacy at November 26, 2006 5:37 PM

In keeping with the pun theme, why not Dreck The Halls?

I also could swear that they've made this exact movie before, so I was totally confused when ads for this started showing up. I might just be thinking of Jingle All the Way, though.

Posted by: Crinn at November 26, 2006 11:13 PM

I totally hear you, Samantha T. And Jeremy said that Danny plays "a boorish twit." So there is absolutely no explanation why someone as young and attractive Ms. Chenoweth would deign to be in his presence, much less marry him.

And yet, that doesn't even seem to be the least believable part of the movie...

Posted by: Bianca Reagan at November 27, 2006 2:35 PM

My son was desperate to see a movie this weekend, so I ran through the list of those showing at the nearest AMC and he said, "Okay, let's see Deck the Halls." I asked him if he was sure, and he said, "yeah, why", and so I read him the synopsis. After which he said, "Wow, that sounds stupid; a whole movie about Christmas lights? Never mind."

In the end, we stayed home. The only viable option was Babel, but at well over two hours, I couldn't see my kid sitting through it.

ANYHOW, my point is, if it sounds stupid to a 13-year-old (a 13-year-old who thought Accepted was the best film of 2006, btw), it's probably pretty fucking stupid.

Hollywood is clearly out of new ideas, which we've known for awhile, of course, but it was never so clear to me as it was when, at the video store the other night, I stumbled upon Behind Enemy Lines 2. I mean, if Stick It and Another Gay Movie and the endless streams of 80s television shows put on the silver screen were not evidence enough, Behind Enemy Lines 2 certainly is.

So it's no surprise they're still cranking out the holiday-themed dreck. As my husband put it, "you know they're drawing blanks when they're writing entire films based on a single scene in a National Lampoon movie."

Posted by: S. at November 27, 2006 6:34 PM

'"Family Comedy". Ghostbusters is a family comedy. It's also brilliant, it can be done.

Posted by: nevin at November 25, 2006 06:52 AM'

No, [i]Ghostbusters[/i] is a family comedy only if the kids are over 16 years old. Danny Ackroyd getting blown by a beautiful ghost is really not something you want your 8 year old seeing, much less explaining it to her/him.

As to this new flick , I admit to liking the pun of the title. It is probably the funniest line in the entire movie, but it's still cute. Re the genre, I may be one of the few people on earth who both peruses rotten.com & wonkette [i]and[/i] actually liked the first "Garfield" movie.

Posted by: Matt at November 27, 2006 11:19 PM

Acutally, most kids who see Ghostbusters don't even seem to register the ghost-blowing scene. If they do, you just tell them that he's being "tickled". Really, I can't see dismissing the whole movie as family inappropriate on the basis of an O-face lasting less than 30 seconds. The rewards outweigh the consequences for me.

And I'm totally with Samantha T, Kristen Chenoweth must be amazingly talented not to be obviously gagging in most of her scenes with DeVito.

Posted by: Genny at November 28, 2006 12:32 AM

Matt,

When I was a kid my brother and sister and I used to run around the living room to the Ghostbuster's song. Our dog would chase us. It was our favorite movie. I watched it probably fifty times before I was a teenager. Now that I'm a bit older, I absolutely adore the movie for so many different reasons, practically none of which occurred to me when I was a child. It's been a hit with my whole family since we first saw it.

Posted by: Jen at November 28, 2006 6:00 PM

It's not just the angelic bj scene that would keep me from showing "Ghostbusters" (a flick I do love) to younger kids. There is a lot of sexual innuendo in there from Murray, mostly to Weaver, there's the line about Atherton's johnson, and then there are the 'scary' scenes like the monster chasing Moranis out of his flat & across the street.

No, when I think great modern family film I think Cuaron's "Little Princess" or the original "Charlotte's Web". Great family flicks of the past: "It Happened To Jane" (possibly Doris Day's smartest vehicle: excellent lesson in civic pride and Yankee ingenuity with Ernie Kovacs as an early variation on Rupert Murdoch), "Cheaper By The Dozen", "Meet Me In St Louis", & "I Remember Mama" come to mind.

Posted by: Matt at November 28, 2006 8:12 PM

I don't think most young children notice sexual innuendo as much as you think they do: I certainly didn't notice any of the things you mentioned when I watched Ghostbusters at about the age of 8, and neither did my sister when she reached that age. There are loads of examples of this: The Simpsons, for example, is probably accepted as family comedy but it contains a huge number of literary references, sexual innuendo, political gawking - most of which small kids just ignore - and which the adults can quietly chuckle at.

I really don't think children need to be protected as much as you think so - not attacking you in any way btw. I hate it when internet discussions get out of hand :|.

Posted by: Bassett at November 29, 2006 1:36 PM

Danny Devito, drunk on the View. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=46wakJ8oggM

Posted by: anikitty at November 30, 2006 1:16 PM

I agree about kids not noticing sexual innuendo. I actually haven't seen Ghostbusters since I was a kid, and I don't remember there being anything in it that was innappropriate... guess I'll have to check it out again now that I'm all grown up!! =)

Same thing with the movie Dirty Dancing. That was my favorite movie as a little kid, and it wasn't until I was older and saw it again that I really understood what all that 'grown up' talk was about.

Posted by: meagan at December 5, 2006 10:39 AM

My 8 year old neighbor, Jackie, REALLY recommended I see this movie. She said it was the funniest movie ever, and that she laughed when "the guy" fell in the lake.

Posted by: Elizabeth at December 7, 2006 2:35 AM

If "Ghostbusters" isn't a "Kid Friendly" movie .. then neither are any of the Kids movies that have come out in recent years ...

Shrek .. Shrek 2 .. a Bugs Life .. Toy Story .. Toy Story 2 .. Charlie & The Chocolate Factory (with Johnny Depp) .. Over the Hedge .. Curious George ..

Just to name a handful -- each of them has sexual innuendos, and adult themed jokes (other than sexual) ..

If this is the case - our kids won't ever be able to watch new movies again .. they'll have to watch The Smurfs, or Carebears from the 80s, or the Partridge Family ..

In hindsight, I'm sure if we sat down and watched any "kid" show from any year, genre and what have you - now as adults, we'd see a few things and hear a few lines that would make us chuckle, then blush because we know the meanings now - Kids .. Don't know the meanings.

Why take away Ghostbusters for a few Innuendos you notice as an adult? Seriously!

Posted by: Amy at December 7, 2006 4:45 PM


















Viral Hits

>> Pajiba Movie Posters

>> Pop Culture's 20 Greatest Dancing GIFs

>> Mindhole Blowers

>> The 100 Greatest Insults of All Time

>> The "Other" 100 Greatest Movie Quotes

>> The 100 Greatest Movie Threats of All Time

>> The Sean Bean Death Reel

>> Chicks Dig Beards: It's Science

>> The Coolest TV Show Title Sequences

>> The Most Rewatchable Movies

>> The Most Expensive Movies of All Time