blogspot
visitor
Death at a Funeral | Pajiba - Scathing Reviews for Bitchy People

alan_tudyk9.jpg

Putting the “Eral” in “Funeral”

Death at a Funeral / Dustin Rowles

Film Reviews | August 16, 2007 | Comments (27)


I went to my first funeral when I was 16 (Phillip’s older brother’s girlfriend’s mom died of cancer); I don’t remember much about it other than I had no idea who the dead lady was in the casket and that I felt awfully awkward being there in a suit I’d probably scrounged up from the Salvation Army the night before (it was the first time I’d ever worn one). But, afterwards, my friends and I reluctantly decided to drive from the church to the burial site, which was about 20 miles away. We drove out on the freeway, and about halfway to the cemetery, we inexplicably changed our minds, reasoning that the funeral ceremony at the church sufficed to exhaust our obligation and there was little sense in suffering through another graveside ceremony (sorry, Alicia). So, at the next exit, we decided to pull off the freeway, turn around, and go back home. Clearly, however, it never occurred to us that the entire funeral procession up to our car would follow us off the freeway and trail us until we’d hidden behind an 18-wheeler at a gas station and those poor grieving folks realized that they’d been inadvertently hoodwinked into losing sight of the lead car. Who the hell knows if they ever managed to ultimately find the gravesite (and why this particular gaffe has not been mined by a bad sitcom yet is beyond me).

I mention this embarrassing anecdote mostly as a way to fill some space, because the decidedly dull Death at a Funeral doesn’t offer much to write about. Written by Dean Craig (Caffeine) and directed by the once decent Frank Oz (The Dark Crystal, What About Bob?, The Stepford Wives), this British comedy seems to want very badly to extend the funeral portion of Four Weddings and a Funeral into a full-length farce. Sadly, as the late Joel Seigel might write, it’s a “funereal endeavor.”

Death at a Funeral suitably takes place in the funeral home where humor had gone to die; a ceremony is being held for a family’s patriarch. The deceased’s son, Daniel (Matthew Macfadyen, 2005’s version of Mr. Darcy), arrives at the parlor only to discover that the director has brought out the wrong body, which suggests, at least, that Death is a comedy. As the family comes together, the movie’s uninspired running gags fall into place: Daniel and his wife, Jane (Keeley Hawes, Mcfadyen’s real-life wife), seem to have more concern about putting down a deposit on a new house than they do the death of Daniels’ father. Daniel’s brother, Robert (Rupert Graves) is a famous author who blew all his cash on a first-class ticket from the States to London for the ceremony, and thus has no money left to pay his half of the funeral costs. Everyone expects Robert to do the eulogy, because he’s the writer, but Robert insists that Daniel do it for reasons I don’t quite understand, except for the fact that Daniel is the movie’s lead and he should thus deliver it.

Elsewhere, two oddball friends of Daniel’s (Andy Nyman and Ewen Bremmer) are charged with picking up the senior-citizen uncle from a nursing home, which leads to the expected hijinx at the funeral when the wheelchair bound uncle really needs to take a shit. There is also the subplot concerning Martha (Daisy Donovan), who is engaged to lawyer Simon (Alan Tudyk), but her family doesn’t approve of Simon, a matter that is not helped when Simon accidentally takes a hallucinogenic instead of Valium and causes a scene when he thinks that someone is alive inside the coffin. Later, he even climbs atop the roof of the funeral parlor naked. Actually, if the entire film had been limited to Alan Tudyk’s scenes, it might’ve been a decent comedy.

Finally, there is a mystery little person (the awesome Peter Dinklage in a distinctly unawesome role), who reveals a secret that finally sets the funeral’s “wacky chaos” into motion at the half-hour mark (the secret being rather obvious in a film of this nature and, of course, involving scandalous gay photos). There is little more to say about Death of a Funeral other than the antics are neither wacky nor all that chaotic in their lead-up to the expected poignant eulogy that’s supposed to redeem the humanity in the misanthropic attendees.

The script tries very hard to shoehorn a lot of embarrassing episodes and madcap gags into the funeral, but Death never really takes off in any meaningful way. Good farce relies on improbable situations, but everything in Death feels lifeless and expected — a bunch of warmed over gags from a thousand other bad comedies. Worse still, under the direction of Oz, the cast — an assortment of mostly excellent British actors — is forced to resort to crass American slapstick, which seems a waste with a crew so capable of dry British humor, of which you’ll find very little here. Indeed, the real death in this film is in the cocked-up writing and execution; honestly, one expects a lot more from freakin’ Yoda.

Dustin Rowles is the publisher of Pajiba. He lives with his wife and son in Ithaca, New York. You may email him, or leave a comment below.


Pajiba Love 08/16/07 | Air Guitar Nation





Comments

Dear Rupert Graves,
What are you doing?
You have been so good in so many things. Take a Girl Like You, The Tenant of Wildfell Hall and when you played that really skeevy reporter on Inspector Morse. You were so cute in The Madness of King George and we all enjoyed your nude swimming with Julian Sands and Simon Callow in A Room with a View.
So what are you doing? Just. Stop it.

Posted by: Rebecca H. at August 16, 2007 5:30 PM

But...but...but...it's Alan Tudyk. With an accent.

*reads a little more*

Oh, well that's okay then. Whew.

Posted by: Vermillion at August 16, 2007 5:33 PM

Wow, I don't know if I want to admit this in my first comment here ever, but I really enjoyed the movie. I saw it at the film festival in NZ and I laughed the whole way through. Generally, I agree with most of the reviews here, but I have to say I really liked this movie and have been telling people that they should see go see it. Why do I now feel so ashamed?

Posted by: Leigh at August 16, 2007 5:47 PM

I wanted it to be good, for Alan's sake. But alas, it looks not that way.

Excellent story though, Dustin.

Posted by: Kevin Longrie at August 16, 2007 5:48 PM

Huh, the previews make Tudyk out to be the lead. Too bad, that.

Posted by: the_Wakeful at August 16, 2007 5:50 PM

Hmmm Keeley Hawes was on my list of Five Same Gender. Too bad the movie isn't good. After seeing her in Wives & Daughters I decided to check out some of her other work. This may miss the list of things to see.

Posted by: lickoriche at August 16, 2007 5:57 PM

Well, I loved it. I admit it. I can live with that.

What puzzles me is that they (apparently) shortened the title to "Death". Or didn't they? I mean, why not leave it "Death at a funeral", as it ought to be? And well, the German title translates roughly like "Dying for beginners"..

Posted by: Vanessa at August 16, 2007 6:20 PM

Gah, that is upsetting. And I was assuming the family didn't approve of Alan Tudyck (just kidding, V, "Tudyk") because he's American, until I saw V's comment. Does Wash do a British accent in this thing?

I sensed trouble this morning when I heard an ad proclaiming this film to be "from the director of Bowfinger." Jiminy-Cricket-on-a-fucking-fishhook, who promotes a movie by linking it to Bowfinger?

Well, it's humming along at 74% on the ol' Tomatometer (including a rave from -- and I'm not shitting you here -- "Spirituality and Practice"). I'll give it a go.

Posted by: socalledonlycousins at August 16, 2007 6:41 PM

Rebecca H., you forgot that Cleopatra movie. Rupert Graves was the only real actor with a believable character in the whole thing.

Then again, you also forgot that bit part in V for Vendetta, a role that could have been played by any idiot straight out of acting school.

Why, Rupert, why?

Excellent cast above, why?

Posted by: Janis at August 16, 2007 9:04 PM

Rebecca H., you forgot that Cleopatra movie. Rupert Graves was the only real actor with a believable character in the whole thing.

Then again, you also forgot that bit part in V for Vendetta, a role that could have been played by any idiot straight out of acting school.

Why, Rupert, why?

Excellent cast above, why?

Posted by: Janis at August 16, 2007 9:05 PM

Damn, I was really hoping that this would be good. Because I know that I'm going to go see it no matter what. Even he's stuck in the middle of a totally boring movie I am not someone who can pass up Alan Tudyk.

Posted by: Sonia at August 16, 2007 10:51 PM

I'm British and I can't stand British movies I'm nonplussed to say Four Weddings and a Funeral sucks. HARD!!!

This doesn't seem any different.

Posted by: Jean at August 17, 2007 4:48 AM

It is 11:09 am ... ... ...

Where is the review of 'Superbad'???? It's Friday at work and I HAVE NOTHING TO DO!!! I'm pretty sure I've reached the end of the internet.

Posted by: PissBoy at August 17, 2007 11:09 AM

How dumb is it that I looked up "Eral" in the dictionary? But I get it now!

Posted by: Jason at August 17, 2007 12:12 PM

Jean - All British movies? Really?

There's nothing like going for that broad sweep I suppose.

But speaking personally, I liked Hot Fuzz, Zulu, Dog Soldiers, Lawrence of Ariabia, Red Road, This Sporting Life, Trainspotting, Late Night Shopping, The League of Gentlemen, 24/7, Shaun of the Dead, The Ladykillers, Dead Man's Shoes, Touching The Void, Wallace & Gromit: The Curse of the WereRabbit....well, you get my drift.

There's more to this country's cinematic output than middle-class rom-coms.

Posted by: Simon B at August 17, 2007 12:16 PM

"the secret being rather obvious in a film of this nature and, of course, involving scandalous gay photos"

Also completely given away halfway into the trailer.
Pass. I'll pick up my 25th anniversary edition of The Dark Crystal instead.

Posted by: audrey at August 17, 2007 1:18 PM

Well that was a dissapointing review. I was hoping this would be a good moie. premise an cast seemed like my kind of movie

lickoriche - in light of your comment, may I suggest you rent Tipping the Velvet

Posted by: Brian at August 17, 2007 1:53 PM

I thought this movie was actually funny, why such a mediocre review? I never think movies are funny, and I actually laughed aloud during this movie several times...

I'd see it again, and recommend it to others.

Posted by: Sizzla at August 17, 2007 8:31 PM

Guys, may I point something out here that should be obvious. Pajibans write good, informed reviews of the kind of movies that we like, or even the kind that we like to loathe, but that doesn't mean it's not okay to disagree with them. We're geeks of varied interests and tastes who enjoy things for one reason or another that someone else may despise them for. I mean, just this month, I admitted that Only the Strong was one of my favorite kung fu movies. But if anyone were reviewing that movie seriously, it would tank. What I'm trying to say is, let's not start treating Pajiba like it's pitchforkmedia.com, where people have allowed all their decision making about an artistic work to be based on one reviewer's opinion.

*Packs away the soapbox.*

Posted by: Brett at August 18, 2007 10:27 AM

You're off your gourd, this flick was great.

And it wasn't in a funeral home, it was in his family's home.

I really don't understand your position. Everything you thought was so played out, I thought was funny. People have been doing comedies of manners since the founding of theater; what makes them good isn't innovative plotting, its the execution, the tempo, the clash between disparate personalities, and watching the one level headed person deal with the chaos, not of his making, as best he can.

As to your crack about slapstick, even Shakespeare had fart jokes and pratfalls in his plays. This is classic stuff.

Posted by: Julian at August 18, 2007 12:26 PM

And might I add that I've seen plenty of movies with mothers who despised their child's spouse, but never one that displayed that hatred with such quick, effortless, and unmitigated callousness. And even with all the things that are going on at once, the director manages to express it all in the same organic, flowing way. The only thing that really seemed to me like it didn't fit was everyone's positive reaction to Simon at the end of the film. Quite frankly, I don't think anyone would be forgiving to a man who did the things he did at a funeral for any reason, unless of course they knew he was hopping.

Posted by: Julian at August 18, 2007 12:33 PM

Just returned home from viewing this film...this critic is so off base...everyone in the audience was laughing out loud. Not something that happens often at films...even comedies....

This critic is missing his sense of humour

Posted by: Kathy at August 18, 2007 11:05 PM

HBO or SHOWTIME, maybe? The big screen in the middle of summer no fucking way...If you need a comedy go see lindsey lohans flic.I have a feeling our critic Dustin R has forgotten more movie crap that you NERDS will ever know.Chill out!! How`s that B-Slim?

Posted by: pasadenamike at August 19, 2007 6:22 PM

Saw this in Dallas at the Magnolia in the West Village and the audience thoroughly enjoyed it, as did I. Pajiba critics are intelligent, articulate writers; they're not God. Go see this movie.

Posted by: Grace at August 24, 2007 1:14 AM

death at a funeral is HILRAIOUS!
i agree with most of your reviews, however you have it soo wrong with this movie.. GO AND SEE IT!
it was a fairly packed cinema, and literally everyone was laughing out loud the whole time. the lady next to me even snorted she was laughing that much. very very entertaining movie.

Posted by: rachel at October 15, 2007 2:59 PM

Gotta go against the review here - found it to be generally entertaining, with the high points (roughly 97% of which were based around Alan Tudyk) outweighing the lows. It's not hugely engaging, and you won't really care about the characters, or the outcomes of any of the subplots, but it's perfectly diverting and good for a few laughs.

Posted by: Shay at November 4, 2007 10:05 PM

This is the only movie besides Gremlins 2 that I've walked out of the theater on.

I wholeheartedly agree with the review above.

People in the theater WERE laughing, but at what I've no idea. Most of the audience was made up of old white ladies.

Posted by: Marcy at December 22, 2007 5:29 PM





Video ads popping up after each page view? Try clearing your browser's cookies.