coraline4sm.jpg

Not Your Mother’s Rabbit Hole

Coraline / Agent Bedhead

Film Reviews | February 7, 2009 | Comments (85)


Eyes are the windows to the soul, or so we’ve been told countless times. Sometimes, however, we cannot trust even our own eyes, for looks can often be deceiving. This disturbing duality forms the basis for Coraline, a spooky film with an ominous “be careful what you wish for” tagline that sets the tone for the cautionary tale within. Simultaneously anxiety-inducing and affecting, Coraline is an exquisitely attractive film that never achieves its visuals at the expense of the story itself. This seemingly impossible feat occurs through an astonishingly effective collaboration between Neil Gaiman, author of the 2002 horror novella, and director-screenwriter Henry Selick (A Nightmare Before Christmas, James and the Giant Peach). So much could have gone wrong on the way to the big screen in the hands of a lesser director, but Selick has achieved the fairly tenuous balance between his own craftsmanship and Gaiman’s work. This total integration took seven bloody years to achieve, and, quite frankly, I am amazed that Selick never went insane during the entire process.

Coraline is, of course, an adaptation of a much beloved book, which was spawned from bedtime stories that Gaiman told his own daughters before weaving these tales into his own sparingly detailed and characteristically clear prose. Those familiar with Gaiman’s writing will recognize that, although his work is often subject to multiple interpretations on the larger themes of life (and death), he doesn’t prescribe any particular meaning for his readers. For that matter, Gaiman doesn’t bother wasting words on anything that is inessential to the plot. Such simplicity, however, is often beguiling in the case of an author whose prose often descends into fantasy with no notice at all. In a dizzying yet deft manner, Selick uses his own dazzling style to smoothly guide the plot through such transitions. The director does, however, make a few judgment calls to both Americanize the tale and add a new character. Those small changes aside this is a faithful adaptation of the source material. Now, on with the phantasmagoria.

Coraline Jones (Dakota Fanning) and her parents move to Oregon, land of everlasting drizzle. In these dreary new surroundings, Coraline finds herself with everything that she needs but nothing that she wants. She misses her old friends, and her Mother (Teri Hatcher) and Father (John Hodgman), who are both writers with deadlines to meet, only pay as much attention to daughter as is required by law. So, Coraline attempts to engage herself but is unable to relate to her attic level neighbor, an allegedly drunk trapeze artist named Mr. Bobinsky (Ian McShane, or her basement neighbors, a pair of burlesque dancers named Miss Spink (Jennifer Saunders) and Miss Forcible (Dawn French), whose glory days have long since past. The closest thing to a friend that Coraline encounters is a somewhat irritating boy, Wybie Lovat (Robert Bailey Jr.), whom she would prefer to just shut up. In short, the young girl is very lonely, quite bored, and vulnerable to temptation. At this point, Selick’s pacing is such that we feel the full banality of Coraline’s frustrations at living in a grey, lifeless flat with nothing to do but stare outside at the rain. As such, when Coraline decides to open the little door in one of her home’s walls, we fully feel her exhilaration as she crawls through a portal resembling an otherworldly umbilical cord and emerges within a reality almost identical to her own, only much better.

This alternate world is much cheerier and brighter, as well as pretty much everything that Coraline has longed for. Her “other” parents (also voiced by Hatcher and Hodgman) are attentive and nurturing. Coraline thinks she could never be happier, but she gets the feeling that something seems just a bit off because all people, animals, and toys have buttons instead of eyes. Well, all except for an enigmatic Cat, who strolls through both realities but, in the alternate world, speaks with the dulcet tones of Keith David. The Cat arrives with a warning: “You probably think this other world is a dream come true. But you’re wrong.” Coraline attempts to brush this remark aside, but her unease is confirmed when the Other Mother presents a gift box containing a sewing needle and two black buttons, which must replace the girl’s own eyes if she wishes to stay. The Other Mother insists, “Soon, you’ll see things our way,” and, as Coraline recoils in horror, so does the audience. Things get even creepier from that point on.

Adding to the audience’s immersion, along with all of the exceptional voice talent involved with this film, is the realism of Selick’s old-school stop motion animation that was created, frame-by-frame, pose-by-pose, puppet-by-puppet, and with stunningly careful attention to detail and movement. After a restrained sprinkling of 3D effects, the respective inertia and kinetic energy of Coraline’s two different worlds feel real. Unlike the binary robotics of CGI, Coraline, as a film and as a heroine, seems as alive to us as the animators themselves. Many 3D flicks these days are scripted around the 3D gimmicks themselves, but, in contrast, Coraline is merely enhanced by its 3D touches, which makes everything feel quite comfortable and altogether natural, aside from a shiver-inducing sewing needle during the opening credits. Most of the 3D here isn’t used to intrude upon the audience but instead to provide contrast and depth to the stop-motion animation. The total effect, although subtle, is that, instead of jumping away from the film, the audience gets pulled into the story. How odd that a director has resisted the temptation of ejaculating all over his audience with all of the 3D wizardry now readily accessible and available. It’s quite the novel approach, really.

This is an achingly gorgeous film, crafted in diligent detail and accompanied by Bruno Coulais’ deathly beautiful score. Much like the heroine herself, Coraline is clever and inquisitive but more than slightly surly at times. Actually, a good measure of the third act comes with quite a bit of scariness for children under ten years. Coraline may come with a PG-rating, but this is really more of a PG² sort of movie. Don’t be surprised if, after watching this film, you awaken with a nightmarish start, only to discover that a whimpering child is attempting to climb into your bed in the middle of the night. Whew.

Agent Bedhead lives in Tulsa, Oklahoma and can be found at agentbedhead.com.


Push Review | The No. 1 Ladies' Detective Agency Book Review





Comments

URL not found! You're killing me!

Posted by: Kiki at February 8, 2009 12:17 AM

Now what the hell kinda publishing schedule is this?

Posted by: Jay at February 8, 2009 12:29 AM

Just came back from catching it. It's everything you said and more. At its core, it's a fairy tale -- of the old kind, where children where in life-and-death situations against magical threats and the stories served as allegories for the passage from childhood to adulthood.

BTW, it's amusing how mature some of the humor is. Particularly the 2 burlesque dancers and their routine in the Other World. The kids were laughing, but not as loudly as the parents.

Oh and I clearly made note of the sign of a good kids' movie, i.e. the entire theater was quiet and not a peep was heard from any child.

Posted by: Fredo at February 8, 2009 12:29 AM

I'm glad you got to see something good for once Agent Bedhead. I'm seeing this.

Posted by: George at February 8, 2009 12:30 AM

Thank Gotopus. I will definately be checking this out.

Posted by: admin at February 8, 2009 12:35 AM

It wasn't perfect, but it was fantastic.

Posted by: dsbs at February 8, 2009 1:11 AM

Despite my love for stop-motion animation, I hate & loathe Neil Gaiman with the fire of a thousand suns.

(And don't even get me started on a Dakota Fanning voiceover. It creeps me out when nine-year-olds speak like cultured, erudite adults. Fa-ree-kay.)

Posted by: SpiceLux at February 8, 2009 1:13 AM

I have been waiting for this movie for years now, and I'm ecstatic to see it get some love here. Your praise gives great promise to an already hopeful Monday night movie.

Posted by: Dagon at February 8, 2009 2:41 AM

But does Coraline sound like a Ukranian prostitute?

Posted by: Bane at February 8, 2009 4:15 AM

Finally. An old-school type fairytale to scare the shit out of kids while teaching them a moral. It was good enough for me as a child and dammit it's good enough for These Kids Today.

Posted by: stardust savant at February 8, 2009 8:15 AM

I like where your head's at Bane.

Very well then, I wasn't sure about this, then had started warming up to it as the promo clips started getting progressively darker. This seals it.

I also like the fact that the voice actors are not Hollywood Doucheroyalty.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at February 8, 2009 8:17 AM

I saw this movie and loved it more than almost anything I had ever seen. Congrats to AB for finally being able to review a good movie!

Posted by: Jeremy Feist at February 8, 2009 8:29 AM

Eeeeeeeee I wanna see it now eeeeeeeeee I wanna go right now eeeeeeeeee but I have so much to do I really should wait until tomorrow but eeeeeeeee I wanna see it now!!! Now now now! Eeeeeeee!

Question: My 5 year old niece, who was scared of a scene in Nemo (I can't recall which one right now, but my sister had to fast forward through that scene every time the kid watched it for a while), really wants to see this. Too scary? I think it sounds like it might be.

Posted by: Anna von Beaverplatz at February 8, 2009 9:04 AM

SETTLE DOWN AvB!

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at February 8, 2009 9:32 AM

Anna von Beaverplatz, I love horror films, I'm 23 years old, and I was horrified by Finding Nemo. How many times can you convince the audience a character has died a horrible death and then bring them back? That's torture. Cruel and unusual punishment.

Posted by: Robert at February 8, 2009 10:04 AM

First, and this helped me out a lot:


It's definite-ly.


Second, this is the antithesis to the "A Blaffair to Rememblack" "review" where I started a flame war. An honest, kick-ass review to a movie that also uses the word ejaculate. That is Pajiba. I don't know..."movie reviews for adults", perhaps that should be a parenthetical secondary title to "scathing reviews, bitchy people".


Positively, this review is entertaining, honest, and helpful.


Negatively, it's quality serves as a foil to what this site has become/is becoming.


You can do it, Pajiba. Fuck popup adds!

Posted by: pissant at February 8, 2009 10:11 AM

It's "its".

Posted by: Jay at February 8, 2009 10:15 AM

w000t!

Drop some more grammar on its ass Jay.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at February 8, 2009 10:42 AM

*cue pretentious classical piece*

And ...next on "PUN" (Pajiba University Network)

Professor Rowles will discuss the collapse and eventual re-emergence of communism in Latin America...

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at February 8, 2009 10:49 AM

I saw this movie yesterday and I was completely ENTRANCED. Th 3D graphics went above and beyond anything I ever expected. You could see every single fiber and hair! I am going to go see it again, despite the extra 3D fee of 2.50 my theater charges. I agree that it is not really for younger children - parents need to realize there are scary scenes and a very scantily clad lady wearing practically nothing.

Posted by: Jessica at February 8, 2009 10:50 AM

Hey it's everybody's duty to correct correctors, and we all have to eat it sometimes.

The pop-ups are out of control though. I hadn't realized how good the program I have at home is.

Posted by: Jay at February 8, 2009 11:13 AM

The pop-ups are out of control though. I hadn't realized how good the program I have at home is.

Posted by: Jay at February 8, 2009 11:13 AM
---------------------------------------------

I'm ASSUMING, you are a NoScript adept.

Pop ups? what's that? :)

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at February 8, 2009 11:17 AM

Don't don't don't DO NOT take a sensitive 5 year old to this movie. Especially not to the 3d version which is immersive enough that small kids may have even more trouble maintaining the necessary separation that keeps them from freaking the hell out and having nightmares for the next 5 months. Even a surly burly 5 year old might be a little young.

Posted by: zhom at February 8, 2009 11:34 AM

Ah yes, the weekend grammar war. I'm sure Agent B will appreciate the extra comments on her beautiful review.
(In my mind the Pajiba staff compares how many comments they each get. It's a status symbol. Also, they sit around a big table and discuss ways to further belittle Prisco.)

Posted by: Optimus Rhyme at February 8, 2009 11:46 AM

"...Also, they sit around a big table and discuss ways to further belittle Prisco.) ..."

--------------------------------------------

Doesn't every Pajican? Seriously, the man is a disgrace, a FUCKING disgrace, the worst thing to happen since Galactica 1980.

I'm making it my life's work to get his ass eradicated from this site.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at February 8, 2009 11:57 AM

Well, I'm dealing with the office setup here and there's definite pop-up monkeyshines going on.

And how dare you assume me to be one of those Firefox cultists!

Posted by: Jay at February 8, 2009 12:10 PM

I'm a broke college student but I'm covering an extra shift at work just so I can go see this... It's one of my favorite books and I've been looking forward to the movie for eons.

I'm so glad to hear that I won't be disappointed.

Posted by: Edie at February 8, 2009 12:18 PM

Wellllll, I don't know about you people but I just watched the Road Warrior and had many beers.

*Puts on Hockey mask and leather chaps*


I'm going to the nearest family owned gas station....

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at February 8, 2009 12:33 PM

Oh, BSlim, you love me riled up.

Thanks, zhom, for that... I told my sister I'd see it first and let her know, but I have no kids of my own and am nervous of being a poor judge of the scariness for a 5 y.o. I've liked scary movies since I was but a wee lass, though when I was her age I was terrified of everything else, especially being hit in the face with stuff, drowning, dying in a fire, sharks, jellyfish, slimy things (particularly on my feet), quicksand, Fankenstein's monster... well, you get the picture. It looked like it'd be too scary for her, but I may not get to see it until next week, and I wanted to be able to tell her something so she doesn't take the poor kid to go see it in the meantime. I knew I could count on Pajiba and its denizens.

@ Robert: ain't it always so with the Disney films? The evil villains, the parental deaths... Bambi and Dumbo made me cry when I was little, and I won't even get into the terror induced by the "It's a Small World" ride in Orlando. All those soulless little mannequins just wating for a power outage to suck the life from you...

Posted by: Anna von Beaverplatz at February 8, 2009 2:03 PM

Just got back and loved it. The 3D element was highly impressive, it reminded me of being at a Disney World attraction. This was the first 3D movie I've seen since this new fad started and I was surprised how well done it was. The movie itself is beautifully made. Seamless CGI and stop-motion mixed with some spectacular sets that are light years beyond The Nightmare Before Christmas (a movie that I also love).

It was definitely worth the wait. As for the scariness, my kids are 8 and 12 and both loved it. But my 8 year old had read the book and these kids watch horror movies with us so they may not be the best barometer for your kids. The movie is more creepy than scary.

Posted by: TylerDFC at February 8, 2009 2:28 PM

I saw this Saturday with a mommy friend; we were trying to see if our 5 1/2 year old daughters could go see it - THEY CAN'T!! LOL! In fact, several grandparents were there with their young grandchildren, and one child was weeping openly throughout the last 1/4 of the film. :/

That said, I LOVED this movie. It was gorgeous and thrilling and frightening and just about everything you'd expect - and more.

Posted by: Darlene at February 8, 2009 3:46 PM

Thank Gotopus

I'm waiting for Godotopus, myself.

Posted by: Goldie at February 8, 2009 4:07 PM

I read the book, and was totally loving this movie...until the ending!

The movie veered so far away from the book ending (after more or less following the book faithfully) is that all I can guess is that maybe test audiences hated the original "book" ending so they changed it (a la I Am Legend).

***BOOK SPOILER ALERT*

In the book, Coraline sets up a tea party, complete with tablecloth, tea set, etc... in the garden. She purposely puts the door key on the tablecloth. She talks out loud about her party, drawing the attention of the Other Mother's hand.
The hand comes to snatch the key, but clever Coraline has set up her tea party over the well. Everything falls inside the well, thus ending the horrific reign of the Other Mother.

Posted by: shake at February 8, 2009 5:16 PM

Oh shake, I'm really disappointed to hear that about the movie! I thought the book's ending was great.

BTW, it was because of pajiba that I read Coraline recently. Y'all had some sort of preview saying that Coraline was being made and people were generally against it because the trailer available made it seem as though they Disneyized the book badly.

Glad to hear that wasn't the case after all. I want to see this in 3D for sure now.

Oh and to the person who loathes Neil Gaiman, can I ask why? Just curious. I'm reading another book of his now, The Graveyard Book.

Posted by: Anastasia Beaverhausen at February 8, 2009 5:25 PM

For what it's worth, Neil is totally behind the movie.

I try to forget that he's friends with Tori Amos myself, so I guess there's probably someone who hates him.

Posted by: Jay at February 8, 2009 5:38 PM

Posted by: Goldie at February 8, 2009 4:07 PM

I see what you did there.

Posted by: Anna von Beaverplatz at February 8, 2009 6:55 PM

@ Robert: ain't it always so with the Disney films? The evil villains, the parental deaths... Bambi and Dumbo made me cry when I was little, and I won't even get into the terror induced by the "It's a Small World" ride in Orlando. All those soulless little mannequins just waiting for a power outage to suck the life from you...

True story, AVB: I had to be taken out of a restaurant at Disney World 4 years ago because they started playing The Fox and the Hound on a TV next to my table. That film traumatized me like nothing else. Friends forever means friends forever, and how dare Disney ruin my childhood by showing otherwise. It's why I'm afraid to make friends: they'll obviously come back and try to kill me years later.

Two trips before that, I became permanently afraid of clowns because the Electric Light Parade featured faceless clowns. Like, solid white masks with little holes for the eyes and no details with big floppy shoes and metallic costumes. Soulless, evil, cruel clowns ready to rape me in Cinderella's Castle.

It took me until I was 15 to get through Pirates of the Caribbean and The Haunted Mansion without having a panic attack.

Yet I love Disney. I could never leave Disney. Sure, they've hurt me before, but I can change them. I know I can. I just need to work harder and they'll come around.

Posted by: Robert at February 8, 2009 7:20 PM

Oh and why do you hate peace and unity? You're going to make the little Pacific archipelagos and Australasian children cry, along with their platypi. That room's also got the best music.

Posted by: Jay at February 8, 2009 7:31 PM

I'm sittin' on the crib dreamin' of...

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at February 8, 2009 7:46 PM

you see this is when Pajiba gets *weirrrrrrrrd* homeys...monkey sacrifices...virgin inspections goats get stewed and shit. WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO...

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at February 8, 2009 7:49 PM

...aaaand watching Heat...can anybody tell me exactly ...when Val got in the Lincoln?

...you know what I'm talkin' about.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at February 8, 2009 8:00 PM

one child was weeping openly throughout the last 1/4 of the film. :/

Jesus, they didn't take the poor thing out?

Robert, I feel for ya. Why would anyone think faceless clowns were anything but the face of creepy faceless evil?

Ummmmm:
A. Neil is God
B. Coraline gave me nightmares when I read it with my kid. He thought it was awesome and creepy, it scared the bejeasus out of me.
I think it had something to do with those black button eyes.
My son is taking his mom to see the movie this week.
sigh
They grow up so fast....

Posted by: jules at February 8, 2009 8:24 PM

Grammar Wars: Part Elebenty

Girls, girls, girls, can we just get one thing right? The word you're groping for is ALTERNATIVE.

If I wanted to alternate between realities, I would do so. (See what I did there? It's a VERB!) In the case of this undoubtedly fine movie, I anticipate with glee the view of alternative realities. (An adjective - whee! And two 'ive' endings to make it really really easy for just about anyone to work out on their own!)

Extract from the amazingly accessible AskOxford:
alternative
• adjective 1 (of one or more things) available as another possibility. 2 (of two things) mutually exclusive. 3 departing from or challenging traditional practices.
• noun one of two or more available possibilities.
-- DERIVATIVES alternatively adverb.
-- USAGE Some people maintain that you can only have two alternatives (because the word alternative comes from Latin alter 'other of two'). References to more than two alternatives are, however, normal in modern standard English.


End rant, because I know it won't do a blind bit of good anyway ... HK.

Posted by: hell.kelpie at February 8, 2009 8:58 PM

...hello hello hello..how big are your tits spambot.!?!?!?!?

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at February 8, 2009 9:14 PM

ZOMG, did BSlim just *edit* a spambot posting?

Hmmmm!

Posted by: hell.kelpie at February 8, 2009 9:34 PM


al·ter·nate [ áwltər nàyt ]

adjective
3. serving as backup: different from and serving, or able to serve, as a substitute for something else
The band decided to go with the song's alternate title.

Main Entry: 1al·ter·nate
Pronunciation: \US & Canada ˈȯl-tər-nət also ˈal-; chiefly British ȯl-ˈtər-\
Function: adjective
4: constituting an alternative

alternate Show phonetics
adjective [before noun]

3 US (UK alternative) An alternate plan or method is one that you can use if you do not want to use another one

al·ter·nate (ôl′tər nit, al′-; for v. ôl′tər nāt′, al′-)

adjective
3. being one of two or more choices; alternative

Posted by: Jay at February 8, 2009 9:39 PM

Also, you're picking a diction fight. It's nothing to do with ongoing grammar or spelling hostilities.

Posted by: Jay at February 8, 2009 9:44 PM

@ Robert: I didn't make it to Disney World until I was 32. I loved Pirates of the Carribean and the Haunted Mansion, but Small World is creepy. Poor pseudo-Mr. vB was curled up in fetal position on the bottom of the boat whimpering by the end. I never saw Fox & the Hound before I was old enough to realize that it would probably kill me.

Thank godtopus they didn't have those clowns when I was there, though. I've already been terrified of clowns since childhood; had I seen faceless ones like you describe there, my family would have had to peel me out from under the hotel room bed.

@ Jay: the best music? Really? Dude. Srsly. It's the same song over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and

Srsly. Dude.

Posted by: Anna von Beaverplatz at February 8, 2009 9:58 PM

No no, the Pacific room's got a Hawaiian instrumental version. Lovely slide guitar.

Posted by: Jay at February 8, 2009 10:02 PM

sooo....anybody got any ideas for how I can use these spiffy 3D glasses I brought home with me from the show?

Posted by: s. pisaster at February 8, 2009 10:05 PM

Hee! It's ok, Jay, I'm kidding around with the Small World hate, really. It's definitely a must-do-it-once type thing.

s. pis, I'll check with pseudo-Mr. vB... I brought mine home (from My Bloody Valentine)for him, because he loves that stuff.

Posted by: Anna von Beaverplatz at February 8, 2009 10:10 PM

Jay: which dictionary? You've not identified it.

An amicable yet heartfelt "Bollocks!" to your diction vs spelling/grammar pedantry; it's still my view that selecting a verb to serve instead of a noun or adjective (as far too many people are distressingly wont to do) constitutes a failure of grammar notwithstanding your bastardised local reference.

HK (who just can't take any more f*cking "alternates")

HK

Posted by: hell.kelpie at February 8, 2009 10:21 PM

I'm sorry, that's really funny. You're calling me a pedant.

Find the dictionaries yourself, I'm off the clock, or come to my place of employment tomorrow morning and I'll show you where to find them, along with the definitions of "grammar" and "diction".

Posted by: Jay at February 8, 2009 10:25 PM

Uh-oh... is that a gauntlet I see thrown down there? Oh dear.

Posted by: Anna von Beaverplatz at February 8, 2009 10:44 PM

Naw, just doing my job.

Posted by: Jay at February 8, 2009 10:55 PM

s. pisaster, check on YouTube. I know there are vloggers that film/edit 3-D videos specifically designed for the trick behind Real-D 3-D. Pretty interesting to look into when they work.

Otherwise, you can always rent the Hannah Montana Concert DVD and give yourself nightmares.

Posted by: Robert at February 8, 2009 10:59 PM

Ok, I know there seems to be a ton of Coraline movie love going on around here, but, uh, well... Yes it's true the visuals were stunning. I can't remember the last time I saw a movie that exquisite and lovely and captivatingly beautiful. The 3D was never gimmicky and the aesthetics were enhanced by the texture brought on by the depth. Truly resplendent.

That having been said... It kind of dragged on. It was too slow in the parts where it could have been picked up; I understand that in exposing the banality of her life a slower pace enhances the mood, but there's mundane and monotonous and I felt like Coraline was just too slow.

But it was super, super pretty. Also, probably a little too dark for widdle little kids.

As a side note, Jay this:
Find the dictionaries yourself, I'm off the clock, or come to my place of employment tomorrow morning and I'll show you where to find them, along with the definitions of "grammar" and "diction".
was hot. Keep it up!

Posted by: Kayanne at February 8, 2009 11:07 PM

I called your behaviour pedantry, I did not specifically call you a pedant. The dictionary I used can be found at AskOxford.com - no secrets here.

Bless you for your North American disabilities; I retire from the field. Take it, it's yours: I'll be enjoying alternative pursuits.

HK

Posted by: hell.kelpie at February 8, 2009 11:37 PM

Also, hey, wasn't the book set in England? Why is the movie set in Oregon? Can we not understand the concept of England or something?

Posted by: Anastasia Beaverhausen at February 8, 2009 11:38 PM

Can we not understand the concept of England or something?

*sobbing* My inability to understand geography is a disease! Show some respect.

Posted by: Kayanne at February 8, 2009 11:56 PM

Also, hey, something else: I'm friends with Neil Gaiman. For real. On goodreads. He's kind of selective, only a smidge over 2000 friends right now.

Posted by: Anastasia Beaverhausen at February 8, 2009 11:57 PM

Okay, bye!

Posted by: Jay at February 9, 2009 12:06 AM

I asked Selick afterwards when the change was made to America instead of England and instantly wished I hadn't. Selick, a tall, thin man who radiates cleverness and kindness in a just-barely awkward way, suddenly looked almost sad and though he explained it was mutual decision between himself, the producers, and Gaiman, I felt like he was actually saying, "Oh, is that really your first reaction?"

There's the "sort of" answer. But apparently he decided to set it in Oregon before moving there and starting his studio in Portland.

Posted by: Jay at February 9, 2009 12:33 AM

So...I was playing with my new 3D glasses and thinking about how the technology works, using a different color for each eye, and I remembered that my eyes actually see colors slightly differently (more blue-toned in the left one, more red-toned in the right). I am now wondering if this has any effect on my depth perception, and also is maybe why 3D, while awesome, is nausea inducing for me. Somebody needs to study this.

Posted by: s. pisaster at February 9, 2009 12:46 AM

How many movies can so subtly use MI jokes? I was the only who laughed (in my NY theater) when her friends called her a troll and a loper. I miss the mitten.

Posted by: Nimue at February 9, 2009 9:08 AM

Gah! I am so sorry I didn't see this over the weekend. But I did finally get to see Let the Right One In, so I guess I'll live. BTW, I LOVED it. I'm so glad it was finally showing at a theater nearby.

I knew I'd love this because I love Gaiman's children's books. They are so fun - full of magic and excitement and still (mostly) tame enough for kids.

Posted by: tt_marie at February 9, 2009 9:48 AM

OH! s. pisaster, you are definitely on to something... my sister can't use the red/blue 3D glasses, for some reason having to do with her depth perception issues (she was born with one eye crossed so badly it had to be surgically corrected).

When I saw My Bloody Valentine, they didn't have the red/blue glasses-they had this "Real D 3D" and the glasses are different. My sister asked me if she could have a pair the next time I go so she can see if they work for her. I'll have to see if there's a difference for her once I give her these new-fangled ones.

Posted by: Anna von Beaverplatz at February 9, 2009 10:10 AM

The glasses these days just look slightly darkened, I don't think they're really using the two color system anymore. If you've got depth perception problems then that'd probaby still be an issue (Sports Illustrated For Kids did a whole issue in red/blue 3-D a few months ago. Even most of the ads. Looks great, and it came with a tear-off pair of glasses....yeah, after one library checkout it's just a magazine with unfocused pictures. The glasses always come back with the Spy Kids dvd though. It's amazing).

Now you take those glasses back to the theater, little miss sticky fingers!

Posted by: Jay at February 9, 2009 10:26 AM

I was one of the people worried that Coraline was going to stray too far into Family Entertainmentland, and so these reviews give me hope...even excitement. I didn't know French and Saunders were Misses Spinks and Forcible, or that Ian McShane was going to be the man in the attic.

My daughter has asked for this to be her birthday party, to take her and her friends to see it after a pizza dinner. Her almost-birthday (she's a leap year baby, so she doesn't actually get a birthday this year) happens to fall on a day when her team is competing, so I wasn't relishing spending all day with six pre-teens, then taking 10 of them to dinner and a lame movie. Now I'm positively psyched about it.

Posted by: Wednesday at February 9, 2009 10:35 AM

This movie doesn't use the red/blue 3D technology. The right and left eye images are projected alternately on the screen which correspond with the right/left polarized lenses in the glasses.
Check out http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Real_D_Cinema.

Posted by: sandyk at February 9, 2009 10:38 AM

I'm surprised to hear so much positivity about this movie. The book was eerie and unnerving. Any mental pictures it gave me were dark and 'shadowy', somehow. The film looks bright and slick and stylized, ready to be rolled out as a line of toys. I can't help being disinterested in it based on the visuals alone.

Posted by: slip at February 9, 2009 10:41 AM

This is the first PG movie and first 3D movie that I've taken my 5 year old to, and she loved it. It freaked her out just enough for her to get a thrill out of it. No problems going to sleep or anything. We'll have to see how she reacts when I put giant black buttons over my eyes before she comes to wake me up.

Posted by: misty at February 9, 2009 10:54 AM

Should it have been in black and white then?

Posted by: Jay at February 9, 2009 11:02 AM

Of course not. But the bright blue background, the blue hair, the big-eyed big head/tiny body thing. It just looks so...cute. It'll look really perfect when it shows up on hoodies and lunchboxes in Hot Topic.

Posted by: slip at February 9, 2009 11:17 AM

Two things!

Re: The Fox and the Hound
When my sisters was a small child she would demand to watch that movie repeatedly, despite the fact that it horrified her so much that she would burst into tears and run out of the room at the scene where Todd gets abandoned in the woods. And yet she would watch it at least once a day.

Re: eye problems & 3D movies
In college we went to see some 3D spongebob movie at the local six flags (in Quebec). This one girl had a messed up eye because she'd cut a nerve in it as a kid so she couldn't focus it, so she couldn't see any of the 3d PLUS she couldn't understand a damn thing because it was in French. This was mostly hilarious to me because I fucking hated her. Ha, ha!

Posted by: nova at February 9, 2009 11:41 AM

Now you take those glasses back to the theater, little miss sticky fingers!
Posted by: Jay at February 9, 2009 10:26 AM

Hell no! They charged me an extra $2 for those things. Damn right I'm keeping 'em. Anyway, the "Recycle your 3D glasses here" box was full.

Thanks, sandyk! I feel all learned up now. Neat.

Posted by: Anna von Beaverplatz at February 9, 2009 12:06 PM

I'm so looking forward to this film, Gaiman and Selick SO make sense as a collaboration.

Posted by: ph at February 9, 2009 12:12 PM

Oh, I was scolding Ms. pisaster actually but.....I wag my finger at you too! Shrink hurts everybody!

Posted by: Jay at February 9, 2009 12:13 PM

Jay, sandyk you're right, these glasses don't rely on the two color system. I thought they toned it down a little to make it more subtle looking, but turns out it's just the color difference I always see. They do make colors change when I tilt my head back and forth though. and I know I'm s bad girl for running off with the glasses, but they didn't specifically tell me not to :(

Posted by: s. pisaster at February 9, 2009 1:20 PM

Frau Beaverplatz, I've gotten stuck on the It's A Small World ride at Disneyland when the power went on the fritz. Despite being just a little kid, I recognized the fetid breath of death wafting ever closer as those tiny animatronic hands groped toward my child flesh in the darkness. Frozen, disingenuous smiles tried to lull me into complacency, but I wouldn't be fooled. Those multinational children wanted me to join them in their static wonderland.

In short, it freaked my world out. I think I might of cried a bit. I still won't go on that devil ride, even as an adult. Although I prefer to belittle it as too childish instead of telling people that I really think it's a demonically possessed.

Posted by: Leigh Hacksaw at February 9, 2009 2:26 PM

This was a beautiful film. I went to the horrible Carmike Cinema theater in town, waited in line for 20 minutes, and annoyed a teenager at the concession stand by *GASP* ordering a soda and popcorn, all to see Coraline in 3D. Worth it, though. Plus, I got to see the trailer for 9 on the big screen, and got excited all again. Yay. Now if only the good theater in town would get 3D equipped.

Posted by: Nadha at February 9, 2009 6:03 PM

In my youth i was a devout They Might Be Giants fan, and when Coraline's other dad sings the song using the piano with the mechanical arms, hearing John Linnell's voice again made me all gooey and nostalgic and squee-like.

Posted by: Scott at February 9, 2009 8:10 PM

We got the trailer for UP in Omaha in 3D, kind of a jarring introduction to the new style of 3D movies. Beautiful, though. This film rocked.

Posted by: tdehr at February 11, 2009 1:08 PM

I loved this movie so, so much.

Posted by: Joe at February 14, 2009 4:04 PM

I loved this movie. It is so lush and beautiful. The 3d makes it feel like you are in the room with them, Although it is definitely scary my two boys aged 6 and 7 loved it.

I highly recommend this movie and I hope that it makes a bundle.

Also since the boys like the movie so much we bought the book Coraline and just started reading it tonight.

I love Gaiman and I am thrilled that the movie was so good.

Posted by: Mebe at March 2, 2009 5:42 AM





Video ads popping up after each page view? Try clearing your browser's cookies.