276_836150105.jpg
And Now I Feel Like Jodie Foster in The Accused

Confessions of a Shopaholic / Hugh Rowles

Film Reviews | February 13, 2009 | Comments (91)


This may very well be my last review for Pajiba, folks. I think I may need to hang up the keyboard. See: Confessions of a Shopaholic has opened my eyes. It has given me untold insight into the female psyche. And I’ve come to the conclusion, sadly, that I’m a failure as a husband. Mrs. Pajiba-hyphenate hasn’t actually voiced it yet, but Shopaholic has clued me in. She’s clearly not happy. If Rebecca Bloomwood (Isla Fisher) is any indication — and there’s no reason to think she’s not; this movie has the Jerry Bruckheimer romantic-comedy seal of approval — then I’m not treating her right. She deserves happiness, and clearly the only way I can offer her that is switching professions. I need a larger salary, an ability to buy her what makes her happy: Gucci boots. Prada bags. Something called a Burberry (is that some sort of fashionable mobile device?). I’m going to need to fall back on the law degree, goddamnit. Our credit card limits only afford us Internet sale items from some place called Garnett Hill, and to be truly happy, my wife needs to spend untold hours in a well-lit boutique shop in Manhattan. It’s the least I can do for her on Valentine’s Day. Unless she’s wearing designer lingerie, I’m afraid that she’ll never be truly fulfilled. Oh, Bruckheimer: This news has cut me to the quick.

Here’s my swan song:

Rebecca Bloomwood shops too much. She’s run up $16,000 in credit card debt (ha! What’s that, like, a semester of college? Give me a break, lady. Call me when your debt hits $80,000, and then we’ll talk). She can’t help it, though. The only thing that brings her true happiness is the feel of a new bag, useless-in-the-winter gloves, or uncomfortable shoes. Unfortunately, that need to buy has gotten her in trouble with a debt collector, one who constantly calls her, shows up at her house, and bugs her at work. To add to Rebecca’s woes, the magazine she works at has been shuttered. But that’s OK. Her dream is to work for a high-fashion magazine. To get there, she takes a job with financial magazine in the same corporate family that she got through sheer drunken luck (see, powers of tequila) and a fabricated resume. Once there, she inadvertently strikes a chord with readers by writing a piece using clothing purchases as a metaphor for something or another to do with finance. She’s an instant hit!

While at the financial magazine, she also develops a keen fondness for her editor, Luke Brandon (Hugh Dancy), a man who forsook his family fortune to self-make himself. Naturally. There are obstacles, however. Chief among them is the fact that Rebecca is a fraud. And while that will buy you disgrace, unemployment, and shame in the real world, in the world of Sophia Kinsella, that’s the sort of thing that will get you a man.

Aside from the career epiphany that Confessions of a Shopaholic brought to me, there is little else redeeming about the film. It’s bright colors and a shotgun blast to the head. It’s dull. It’s long. It’s painfully out of sync with the current economic climate. There are only three genuine seconds in the entire film, and that comes in a small line delivered by John Goodman, who can shit 64 pound turds more appealing that Shopaholic. Although, miraculously — and as bad as Shopaholic is — Isla Fisher somehow comes out of it unscathed. She’s frothy and likable and truly a great comedic talent, if only she’d had the right material. She has a more pleasant, brighter presence than all of the rainbows that Katherine Heigl aspires to murder. She’s the only thing in Shopaholic that kept me from folding myself backwards in my theater seat until my neck broke.

So, if you truly care about your sweetheart on this Valentine’s Day weekend, don’t take her to Confessions of a Shopaholic. There are only two possible scenarios, and they’re both bad: Either she’ll hate it and your date will be a bu(s)t, or worse: She’ll actually like it, and you’ll lose complete respect for her. As for me, It think I’ll go scrape my name off the Internet before any my potential employers try to Google me. Or: I could just change my name to Hugh and adopt an English accent. Man: That works in every other romantic comedy!

Hugh Rowles is the publisher of Pajiba. He lives in London with his posh sweaters and calls a vagina a fanny. You can send him an email or leave a comment below


My Name is Bruce Review | Friday the 13th Review





Comments

Unfortunately Fisher will now be condemned to bubbly "clever" cliched eh... "comedies" for the rest of her career i.e. when she stops being perceived as hot.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at February 13, 2009 3:02 PM

Hahaha, fanny!

Posted by: Alli at February 13, 2009 3:05 PM

Dustin/Hugh, I'm sorry to hear about your retirement and I wish you nothing but the best. I'm assuming that your departure will leave the seat of power unoccupied, and as such I call dibs on seizing it. It shall be renamed "Mikejiba" and I shall run it for a infinitely finite amount of time, before selling control off to the highest bidder, after which I shall retire to a palatial estate in Newark, New Jersey.

Oh and BSlim, Isla Fisher stopped being perceived as hot in my eyes the minute she spoke Prada.

Posted by: Mike R. at February 13, 2009 3:13 PM

Hey now, is that title a rape joke?

Rape is never funny.

Posted by: Snath at February 13, 2009 3:14 PM

With a name like Hugh Dancy, is it any wonder that he was into musical theater?

(that is a ref to an interview with one Bridget Regan, a heretofore unknown theater/movie actress, who was trotted out by Sam Raimi to pitch her new Xena-esque show L.o.t.S., but wanted to make sure we all knew that she was never a fantasy-reading geek, just a music theater geek. Cuz there's a diff).

Posted by: Stella at February 13, 2009 3:18 PM

I started reading the review and thought "huh, I didn't know Dustin had a brother". And then he referred to "Mrs. Pajiba Hyphenate" and for a brief moment I thought it was pretty dumb for Hugh to admit to sniffing around Dustin's tree on Dustin's site. Then my second brain cell yawned and started working and I realized that humor was in the works.

Posted by: stipe42 at February 13, 2009 3:19 PM

Oh and BSlim, Isla Fisher stopped being perceived as hot in my eyes the minute she spoke Prada.

Posted by: Mike R. at February 13, 2009 3:13 PM

-------------------------------------------------

I think I have to agree.

See, this is why I love *the Paheeva* the almost uncanny ability to put themselves through the suck....so you don't have to.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at February 13, 2009 3:25 PM

the minute she spoke Prada.

Stop foisting the pain on others, Mike.

Stop it!

Goddammit I'm gonna need another pint! This trailer isn't in front of "Coraline 3D" is it? I didn't make it in time after the dentist today and have to go to tomorrow and....I just couldn't take that again.

Also I've never seen an Isla Fisher movie, so she's just that other woman who some people think is more attractive than Amy Adams, or is Amy Adams, and doesn't make any movies I want to see. No love lost!

Posted by: Jay at February 13, 2009 3:34 PM

As a proud fantasy geek, I'm going to have to call you on that, Stella. Musical theatre geeks are a different breed entirely from the in-high-school-I-spent-my-lunch-breaks-in-the-library-playing-D&D fantasy nerds. They are brash, obnoxious, and prone to singing off key as loudly as possible. Us fantasy nerds at least have a shot at growing up to be normal, somewhat neurotic adults. Those musical theatre geeks are fucked. Most of them I knew from high school went on to either become lawyers or waitresses. Drama, drama, drama.

Posted by: Leigh Hacksaw at February 13, 2009 3:36 PM

Fisher to me is like....ah ...mmmm... a poor man's version of what Lindsay Lohan *MIGHT* have become.

You know, if she wasn't raging crackwhore dyke.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at February 13, 2009 3:37 PM

Hugh, I don't care if you think this movie sucks, I am going to see it anyway and probably be mildly amused, since fashion is my explosions.

Posted by: Agente Provocatrice at February 13, 2009 3:38 PM

Every time I see the commercial for this waste and she says, "oh my God, you speak Prada!?" my heart fills with murder.

Posted by: jbrader at February 13, 2009 3:39 PM

Can't...just...can't. It's too...bad. Just...bad.

Bad.

Posted by: Smokin at February 13, 2009 3:43 PM

Either she'll hate it and your date will be a but, or worse: She'll actually like it...

you kids and your crazy internet language

Posted by: mswas at February 13, 2009 3:45 PM

I have read several of the Shopoholic books. They're fun and lightweight "OhpleasegawdletwinterendsoonmybrainhurtssoooomuchIamsadandunhappyandevenmakingrandomBeckrefereferencesisn'thelping" books. That is as long as you don't think too hard about how pathetic a character she is.

However, when I saw this trailer all I could think was Oh no...ohhhh no!

That said I still love Isla. She is so charming that I want to see everything that she is in. Well, everything other than this. I even saw Hot Rod *shudder*

Posted by: Park at February 13, 2009 3:46 PM

What's sad is that I read the book and I can tell from the previews that the movie and book are probably similar in name only. Which is sad, because I kind of liked the book.

Posted by: DoubleH at February 13, 2009 3:47 PM

I apologize for the poor grammar in my first post. That's what I get for posting while on cold medicine.

Back to bed I go.

Posted by: DoubleH at February 13, 2009 3:50 PM

I pass about 15 posters for this moive on my way to work in the morning. I always perk up a little because for some reason I think that the woman in the picture is Amy Adams.

Do you think Fisher realised what a turd this movie was and bribed the publicity department to photoshop her into Adams so that people would not associate it with her?

Posted by: Killa at February 13, 2009 3:53 PM

My baffling sister loves this unholy series of books. She's a smart, successful, all around good person, but she has an insatiable love of shitty chick lit. I guarantee she's seeing this movie. And I guarantee that this is just the first in a long series of shitty Shopaholic sequels because of people like her who will see this movie. The same kind of people that gasped instead of groaned when Mr. Big proposed to Carrie at the end of the interminable, indefensible, boring as sin Sex in the City movie.

Posted by: Leigh Hacksaw at February 13, 2009 3:54 PM

Here's the whole "Shopoholic book inner monologue"

It got cut off before.

"Ohpleasegawdletwinterendsoonmybrainhurtssoooo
muchIamsadandunhappy
andevenmakingrandomBeckrefereferences
isn'thelping"

Posted by: Park at February 13, 2009 3:55 PM

OMGodtopus! Thanks Leigh. I HATED the Sex and the City movie and have gotten sooo much crap for it.

A bunch of the women in the theatre gasped when Carrie gave token black secretary friend, uh, I mean Jennifer Hudson, a designer bag. I felt sick to my stomach

Posted by: Park at February 13, 2009 3:59 PM

But, but, but ... does she get the guy of her dreams in the end?

Wait, don't ruin it for me.

No tell me.

*feverishly bites finger nails*

Ok. just give me a hint.

Posted by: L.O.V.E. at February 13, 2009 4:02 PM

A bunch of the women in the theatre gasped when Carrie gave token black secretary friend, uh, I mean Jennifer Hudson, a designer bag.

Did they gasp because they saw it as a touching, true signal of friendship and racial unity amongst two whip smart women in New York's hustle and bustle "dog eat dog" world? Or did they gasp because they were racially insensitive twats who muttered to themselves, "Oh...my...God...she gave HER a designer bag?"

You may think that question has no weight to it, but it helps me determine what prescription to administer to them...a seriously traumatic mental deprograming or a good slap across the face.

Posted by: Dr. Controversy at February 13, 2009 4:05 PM

That's an excellent question Doc (can I call you Doc?) I'm not sure what the answer is, but it was gross. It was also icky to see a bunch of women all trying to be the characters shrill-voicedly screeching and designer heeledly traipsing around Toronto. People Toronto IS NOT NEW YORK. Also "Sex in the City New York" IS NOT NEW YORK.

Phew! I feel much better.

Posted by: Park at February 13, 2009 4:16 PM

I gasped at the complete fugliness of the bag. I don't care if that was a designer bag made of the finest Corinthian leather, I would have taken it back.

Posted by: Morgagod at February 13, 2009 4:23 PM

This movie is insulting to women.

Yet I know women like this. They all worked at my law firm and talk about money and traveling and houses and purses all day long. That's one of the many reasons I left and am now happily making 1/3 of my former salary.

As for shopping...I truly do care about my appearance. I think I dress pretty well. But I don't LOVE shopping. I mean, it's okay, and I will do it when I need to, but I don't do it for fun or because of some weird compulsion. I can't tell a designer purse from a Target purse, so I usually buy mine for $30 at TJ Max. I like pretty shoes, but I never buy really expensive ones. To me, wasting hundreds and hundreds of dollars on shoes or a purse seems insane. I mean, what's the point?

Anyway, I totally resent this shopaholic idea. It paints women as being dumb with money, shallow, and obsessive. I therefore refuse to see this movie even thought I love Isla and got a little wooed by the preview (because...bright colors! fun music! Isla!).

Posted by: tt_marie at February 13, 2009 4:27 PM

I will NEVER by choice see this movie. I find it offensive in the same way I find any show/movie that riffs on "Lifestyles of the Rich and Famous" offensive. Damn it, trying and succeeding in brainwashing stupid, ill-educated people into believing that paying $2,500 for a purse is justifiable or $400 for sneakers when you can't afford the rent, is wrong. Glorifying consumer overspending and portraying it as "cute" and a great way to meet a man makes me see red. So few Americans grasp the basis of economic, financial stability that I just cringe when I see these things. Designer labels are a pathetic attempt to feel better about yourself through retail therapy. Sad.

Posted by: Sharopa at February 13, 2009 4:28 PM

My wife has this craving for designer bags that comes and goes. It's in full swing right now.

She bought herself a new Juicy bag last week, and for Valentine's Day I got her a Juicy wallet to match it.

Ugh.

Typing those words made me want to cut my fingers off.

Posted by: Snath at February 13, 2009 4:30 PM

Morgagod, I agree to the nth degree. Fugly as hell. If I took a shit then slapped a designer label on it, do you think Carrie Bradshaw/Rebecca Bloomwood would adorn their tresses with my masterpiece? I remember Parker wore a dead bird in her hair to the premiere of her shite movie, so I'm going to file that under the "potential for greatness" pile. It's soooo couture.

Posted by: Leigh Hacksaw at February 13, 2009 4:38 PM

Ok, I feel like I need to talk to someone about this. Someone who'll understand. I have a friend who declared to me, unironically, that Twilight is "the best movie" she's ever seen. EVER! The same friend loves Sex and the City and in fact attempted to get me to go see it with her. At which point I gave her a look that made one of my other friends physically restrain me because I was about to cut a bitch. And now, I fear she may actually ask me to go see this one as well, in which case, I WILL hurt her.

Phew that felt good. Carry on.

Posted by: Joker at February 13, 2009 4:48 PM

My sister is also insanely defensive about Twilight being the best movie ever, you stupid hateful snob! Robert Pattingson and I are gonna get married and have tons of vampire babies that will claw their way out of my womb!!!

She's got shitty taste in films. I feel your pain Joker.

Posted by: Leigh Hacksaw at February 13, 2009 4:51 PM

The pink Mac is also bothering me. Can you change the picture to something like...barking dogs with spittle flying around or something?

Posted by: Jay at February 13, 2009 4:51 PM

'... and for Valentine's Day I got her a Juicy wallet to match it....'
Posted by: Snath at February 13, 2009 4:30 PM

-------------------------------------------
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

*cue cracking whip*

*again*

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at February 13, 2009 4:53 PM

Leigh, how old is your sister? My friend is 28, has a freaking doctorate and yet...*sigh*

Posted by: Joker at February 13, 2009 4:55 PM

Oh I know, BSlim, I know. Trust me, how I know.

Posted by: Snath at February 13, 2009 4:59 PM

Saw one of the eight thousand trailers for this and my man honest-to-God turns around to me and says, "Aren't you women sick of this shit yet?"

We are, but how do we get them to stop??

Posted by: Monica at February 13, 2009 5:13 PM

Hugh/Dustin, I wish you all the luck in using that law degree. With all the layoffs going on, it's about as useless as this film.

Posted by: jimbob at February 13, 2009 5:26 PM

I love the subtle message that men can get to the top by their own means and strength, but a woman can only do it by lying and conniving and appealing to other mindless idiots through shopping.

Fuck. I really am just so tired and angry that these movies keep getting made. I'm beyond tired. Someone shoot these people in the head FOR THE LOVE OF GOD.

As Monica said: HOW DO WE MAKE THEM STOP?!

Asking people to not watch them is useless. WHAT CAN WE DO?

Posted by: figgy at February 13, 2009 5:29 PM

Blood and fire, my friends. Blood and fire.

Posted by: stipe42 at February 13, 2009 5:33 PM

And seriously, who the FUCK thought it was a good idea to foist this character on the world NOW? Waah waah I can't afford to buy a scarf that costs as much as a teacher makes in a year waaah waaah my life is hard yeah you know what?

FUCK YOU IN THE BUTTHOLE.

...I need to step away. This whole thing is turning me into the Hulk.

Posted by: figgy at February 13, 2009 5:37 PM

Joker, my sister is 23, not 12 like one would expect. She's got a respectable job in marketing. She's going back to school to get her masters soon. And she has been bitten by the ZOMGTwilight bug. It's infectious and causes rational individuals to apparently lose their shit whenever you criticize the absurdity of vegetarian vampires.

Posted by: Leigh Hacksaw at February 13, 2009 5:41 PM

She's got a respectable job in marketing.

Now there's an oxymoron.

Posted by: stipe42 at February 13, 2009 5:48 PM

Ha! Well she did used to work for a place where everyone brought their dogs to work with them because they were zany and *creative.*

Posted by: Leigh Hacksaw at February 13, 2009 5:55 PM

How does a movie aimed at women manage to present its audience as shallow, vapid, self-centered, immature and materialistic? And how does it avoid getting destroyed by its target audience?

Posted by: Fredo at February 13, 2009 5:57 PM

Isn't fanny Englandish for butt?

Posted by: madmonk at February 13, 2009 6:10 PM

I have read several of the Shopoholic books. They're fun and lightweight "OhpleasegawdletwinterendsoonmybrainhurtssoooomuchIamsadandunhappyandevenmakingrandomBeckrefereferencesisn'thelping" books. That is as long as you don't think too hard about how pathetic a character she is.

However, when I saw this trailer all I could think was Oh no...ohhhh no!

Ditto.

Posted by: Sarina at February 13, 2009 6:11 PM

That was me, not Sarina. Sorry Sarina! Didn't mean to make people think you liked the Shopaholic books.


OR DID I?!

Posted by: Sabrina at February 13, 2009 6:13 PM

Yeah, same here, Park and Sabrina. The books are light and amusing, but man, I just wanted to whack some sense into that woman! What's so hard about shopping for shiny inexpensive things rather than digging yourself deeper in the hole?

That said, I'm sure I'll see this. Hopefully on video, but I suspect the same gal who has dragged me to the last three chick flicks I've seen in theatre will want me to come with her to see this one too.

Posted by: meaux at February 13, 2009 6:31 PM

I wiped my fanny with pages from Confessions of a Shopaholic. Anyone wanna kiss my paper cut all better?

Posted by: Janey at February 13, 2009 6:32 PM

I took fashion studies for four years in high school which culminated with me designing and sewing my own grad dress. Fashion is more than labels, it's a process, it's an art. And although I appreciate the artistry of certain designers, it doesn't mean I go rushing out to buy everything that Vogue tells me to buy.

Now I am a graduate student, studying complex humanitarian emergencies, which basically means I study the worst things a collective of humans can do to another collective of humans.I study things that people turn a blind eye to every, single day. Reading fashion mags and blogs gives me a much needed mental break. So am I a vapid, self-centered, and shallow person, because I like fashion?

Posted by: Agente Provocatrice at February 13, 2009 6:40 PM

This movie looks like it's cun fannytastic.

Posted by: OscarTamerz at February 13, 2009 6:45 PM

Isn't fanny Englandish for butt?

Nope. Strictly vulva. Just to confuse you. Like how a garter belt is "suspenders" and suspenders are "braces".

Now there's an oxymoron.

JOURNALISM GRADUATES RAAAAAAWWWWWWWRRRRRRR!!!!!!

Posted by: Jay at February 13, 2009 6:53 PM

I have a special affection for Hugh Dancy, he just gets mediocre/terrible film roles. He's pretty great in a version of Daniel Deronda and is charming enough in The Jane Austen Book club. Too bad I would probably hate this movie.

Posted by: kelsy at February 13, 2009 6:54 PM

Hear hear, Agente!

After a long, hard day slogging in a swamp, looking like a homeless derelict in chest waders, is it so wrong to want a little mindless fluff to remind me that I am, in fact, a girl? Doesn't mean I have any desire to spend three figures on a pair of shoes or a purse, but it's still fun to look.

Posted by: meaux at February 13, 2009 6:57 PM

So am I a vapid, self-centered, and shallow person, because I like fashion?

Agente Provocatrice, absolutely not. But you would be if you spent yourself into debt just to obtain it.

And now that I've calmed down a little from the anger that this stupid movie brought on, I suppose this is no worse than many dick flicks that would lead one to assume that anything with testosterone will instantly fall in love and go through hell and back to protect something with tits so big that if she rolls over wrong while asleep she'll suffocate, can barely think clearly enough to feed herself when she gets hungry, and likes sparkly shiny things enough to hook-up with big brutes who drive nice cars and buy her diamonds and Prada bags.

Posted by: Sharopa at February 13, 2009 7:17 PM

So am I a vapid, self-centered, and shallow person, because I like fashion?

I don't think anyone said that, actually. I think the irritant here is that it's a story about a vapid, self-centered and shallow person being celebrated, or at least "ohhhh what am I gonna do with you, you irresponsible scamp? You are adorable. Awwww, I can't stay mad at you". Fashion happens to be the milieu of this woman's condition. I understand what you mean how people have their different cinematic brands of crack (see the Statham crowd here) but, for me, the premise isn't cute or funny, it's just obnoxious, like that woman who said "I'm in credit card debt from shopping too much! Give me money through my website!"...and they did. Bullshit.

Plus, the outfits on the ads over at Dlisted today?

Fuuuu-huuh-huuuuuuh-huuuuuuuuuuug

Posted by: Jay at February 13, 2009 7:18 PM

I was rather excited for this movie when I saw that Isla Fisher was in it. Then came the cognitive dissonance of trying to write off the hateful feelings which grew exponentially inside me each time I suffered through the trailer. Then...then I agreed to see this movie just before reading this review.

...are you there, Godtopus? It's me, Mike, and I'm pretty scared right now...

Posted by: Mike at February 13, 2009 7:19 PM

I guess there's something wrong with me, because I've never gotten the appeal of spending tons of money to carry around this or that to look like all my pals (or better than?). I've always thought of "designer" fashion as a big scam. However, to each her own...

Posted by: Cindy at February 13, 2009 8:21 PM

I guess I may as well go on and eat the male hormones and start putting money away so I can buy my own penis, because I don't get this fashionista bullshit... and I'm a GIRL. I can dress myself appropriately not only for weddings, funerals, and bar mitzvahs, but also for drinkin beer, playin pool and kickin the everlovin shit out of people who clearly have it coming. What I can NOT force myself to do is buy a two hundred dollar pair of shoes or purse... or ANYTHING to wear. My most expensive piece of clothing are my Doc Martens- they were $100 when I bought them 10 YEARS AGO. AND THEY ARE STILL MY FAVORITE SHOES.

I buy my panties at WAL MART.

I am a disgrace to my gender and no one will ever love me.

Posted by: Cletus at February 13, 2009 10:38 PM

We can be disgraceful together, Cletus. I can dress appropriately for any occasion - even a charity ball - but I absolutely refuse to give a shit about a designer tag. Face it, a lot of the stuff is just butt-ugly AND they want you to spend hundreds of dollars on it. How the hell does that make sense? $400 is not a pair of shoes. It's the lumber to fix up the deck, or some new tires, or the approximate amount I paid after insurance for my son's impressive ability to fracture his leg with his own ass.

Movies like this make me want to beat all the people who made them, the folks who promote them, the owners of all the theaters that show them, and everyone who pays to see them. Frankly, I'm too tired to do that, so I'll go back to pretending this movie doesn't exist.

Posted by: Reba at February 13, 2009 11:42 PM

2 things about this " swan song " review... first, does a movie have to be " in sync with the current economic climate" to get a passing grade? this chickest of flicks was probably in the can at the time the economy tanked anyway but, in all seriousness, what the hell does the economic climate, good or bad, have to do with film making?
second, i guess the heigl bashing is unanimous among the pajiba pundits but here is a timid vote for heigl over fisher ... any time!

Posted by: snake at February 13, 2009 11:51 PM

I hate movies like this...I think my dislike just grows because it seems like there are so many of them and that people, probably due to the insane promotion of these movies, actually pay to see them.

snake, i suppose the current economic climate shouldn't have anything to do with the film's review, in theory anyway. Yet, for me it does. I'm just tired of movies celebrating stupid but somewhat physically attractive characters. I like cheesecake every now and then but I don't need mine drenched in whip cream, chocolate syrup with a cherry on top. I need some sustenance and these movies are too many empty calories.

Posted by: Mik at February 14, 2009 12:47 AM

Jay, saw the same thing. You must be talking about that thigh-high number.

Posted by: L.O.V.E. at February 14, 2009 1:24 AM

That was me, not Sarina. Sorry Sarina! Didn't mean to make people think you liked the Shopaholic books.

OR DID I?!

I'm on to your scheme, Sabrina!

Actually, no I'm not. I can't imagine what one would possibly gain by impersonating me, aside from a whole lot of people trying to convince them to eat pie.

Posted by: Sarina at February 14, 2009 1:38 AM

Now that I think of it, the most I've spent on shoes was $158. My most expensive clothing item, and they're combat boots. Who says war can't have arch supports?

Also, you can see why a movie about an airhead with a shopping problem is lost on me. I'm busy cleaning my M4, which incidentally was around the same price as a Louis Vuitton bag... but with more bullet-y goodness.

Posted by: Porkchop at February 14, 2009 1:56 AM

Posted by: L.O.V.E. at February 14, 2009 2:00 AM

That was on one side, and a studio shot of this was on the other:

http://www.islafisherweb.com/media/displayimage.php?album=279&pos=11

Ghastly

Posted by: Jay at February 14, 2009 2:13 AM

Reading these books was like reading a poorly written and non-scientific study of someone whose life is so completely alien to my own that I couldn't help but find it interesting. I'll probably go see this movie and find it hilarious, not intentionally, but in the same way Rambo is; ridiculous and like a train wreck involving orphans, puppies and Mr. Bean.

Plus I'll probably do exactly what I did for Sex and the City and smuggle in a bottle of wine. I totally recommend this for any movies of this genre. If you want to make it into a drinking game just drink whenever you predict something will happen beforehand. If you try this game, I suggest bringing a bottle for each you and your friends.

Oh and to answer the question, why do these things keep getting made? Its my fault. I bought a ticket. I showed up. I ate the popcorn. I am so so sorry. Truly, I am. Godoctopus forgive me, and help me find my way.

Posted by: leheather at February 14, 2009 2:32 AM

@Agent Provocatrice: I didn't mean that you or the artists, designers or craftsfolk of fashion are shallow or vapid (at least not as a collective. I'm sure there are individuals who could fit that description).

The point I was making is that the heroine at the heart of this tale for women isn't an artist or a designer. She's a consumer. And instead of pushing the idea of artistry, it's pushing the idea of vapid consumerism.

Posted by: Fredo at February 14, 2009 2:53 AM

My on again, off again frienemy really wanted to see this with me. I once again pointed out that I have no romantic interest in her and would never date her, even if she was the last woman on earth, and she walked away, only to text me asking if I would go see it with her.

Some people don't learn. Christ, she's met my current girlfriend. We'll be marathon-ing the Polanski apartment trilogy (Repulsion, Rosemary's Baby, The Tenant) today over cartons of Americone Dream in the early afternoon before heading out for dinner and a screening of Coraline. It's good to date a fellow horror fan.

Posted by: Robert at February 14, 2009 7:48 AM

The dog dies.

/Spoiler

Posted by: branded at February 14, 2009 10:46 AM

first, does a movie have to be " in sync with the current economic climate" to get a passing grade?

I think the point was that it's going to be very difficult for the average filmgoer to be sympathetic towards a character who has massive debt because she just can't stop spending thousands of dollars on shoes and bags and clothes that most people can't even afford to window shop while many of those filmgoers are worried about whether they're going to be laid off from their jobs and how they're going to afford rent, car payments, mortgage payments, medical care for their children, etc. etc.

I seem to recall Dustin making a similar observation with the timing of Revolutionary Road, i.e. how can you expect your audience to be sympathetic with people who have it all? It doesn't not get a "passing grade" for that, it's just going to be more difficult to get the audience to care about the characters, which is going to result in their not enjoying the film, because how do you enjoy a film when you don't care about the characters?

Please to forgive, apparently I am not so good at the English today.

Posted by: Anna von Beaverplatz at February 14, 2009 10:57 AM

Also:

We'll be marathon-ing the Polanski apartment trilogy (Repulsion, Rosemary's Baby, The Tenant) today over cartons of Americone Dream in the early afternoon before heading out for dinner and a screening of Coraline.

Robert, can we please be friends? I promise I won't try to date you. I just want to hang out, because this right here sounds like a splendid afternoon.

Posted by: Anna von Beaverplatz at February 14, 2009 10:59 AM

The only thing that brings her true happiness is the feel of a new bag,

Sex Addicts Anonymous is a great place to meet women.

Posted by: admin at February 14, 2009 12:00 PM

Beautiful, admin!

Posted by: meaux at February 14, 2009 12:05 PM

Anna, my friend, this is the multi-faceted relationship test. As mentioned in a previous date movie diversion here, I put my girlfriends through Repulsion, Rosemary's Baby, and The Tenant as a sort of IQ test. If I can't discuss literary fiction and nuanced film making, I've got nothing. An oversimplification of my interests, perhaps, but that's what it comes down to. That and awful reality TV programming. And theater. Have to be able to hang with Rogers and Hart or Martin McDonagh.

The other element, of course, is whether or not they can handle horror films, as I will not be bullied away from my favorite genre just to date someone. It's not like I'm making them watch hardcore raped by the devil movies or cannibal epics if they don't want to; I just need to know if they can handle a good slow burn once in a while, or a really cheesy B-Movie. And, naturally, if they start saying "I love horror films. Have you seen [Mirrors]? It's so good," it probably isn't a good match. Which is partly why that other girl is a frienemy.

Posted by: Robert at February 14, 2009 1:17 PM

whatever this movie or any other movie made you feel..please remember its just a movie!!!so get over it

Posted by: kk at February 14, 2009 3:51 PM

So does this movie offer us any advice other than be a selfish shallow lying cunt and you will get your man?

Posted by: Troll at February 14, 2009 4:53 PM

"whatever this movie or any other movie made you feel..please remember its just a movie!!!so get over it"

Yeah! Why on earth would you come onto a movie review site and discuss movies? What the fuck is wrong with you people?

Posted by: Craig at February 14, 2009 6:07 PM

What the fuck is wrong with you people?

Dude, you don't have the time.

Posted by: admin at February 14, 2009 6:47 PM

Get over it?

So you're saying then that years - nay, decades of study from critics, theorists, and communication scholars means nothing. That theories arguing that movies (among other media) not only mirror our society, but also create it, are irrelevant. That we should just allow these stereotypes of women to continue, unabated, ad infinitum, and go on creating generation after generation of people who think that being and/or having these stereotypes is acceptable. Because it's "just a movie". I see.

Get over it, my fanny.

Posted by: Anna von Beaverplatz at February 14, 2009 6:51 PM

Get over it, my fanny.

You don't want to get AvB mad. You wouldn't like her when she's mad.

[sarcasm]But I would appreciate if you laid off the potty mouth AvB. It offends my delicate sensibilities.[/sarcasm]

Posted by: admin at February 14, 2009 7:51 PM

AvB smash!!

Apologies, admin. I just get so worked up sometimes...

p.s. we finally got a sarcasm font? awesome!

Posted by: Anna von Beaverplatz at February 15, 2009 12:21 AM

If this movie is indicative of what it means to be a girl in New York, then I'm definitely living in the wrong city. Also, my idea of a chick flick is "Last Tango in Paris". Isla is adorable, but this movie looks rancid.

Posted by: Miss Anthropy at February 15, 2009 2:35 PM

You know, I don't even really think this applies due to the long incubation period that takes place before the release of major motion picture, but I have a thought.

Earlier this week, I was doing some research about music produced during the Black Plague. There isn't any documentation to support a reason as to why people did what they did, but it doesn't take some kind of drawn-out perusal to see that a very great amount of the music was jocular in tone. It wasn't all dirges and gnashing of teeth.

Why? To support the requests of patrons, willful blocking out? It's not incumbent upon me to say anything definitively, but I know that I just want to get out the headspace of the economic downturn (which has affected my family). Mounting bills, unpaid wages and layoffs are just not something that can occupy my thoughts all day every day.

I want to make it categorically clear that I don't believe that Americans should have to shoulder this brunt because it was some goings-on in THAT country that did this. I don't have a callous 'oh well' attitude about what my American friends have to endure: it's a a yak-piss of a situation, and you're as innocent as I am. But it is beyond frustrating to watch your life take a dive because of what a few corrupt jag-weeds did in a country in which I've never even set foot. Sometimes you've got to escape your brain.

To wit: I've never paid to see a film about the current war. And everybody brings up the Jane Austen and the Napoleonic Wars as a huge example of this phenomenon. Shirley Temple films, anyone?

Again, timelines are a factor, and I won't see this film (I rarely go to the cinema as it is), but who wants to take a field trip every afternoon to the Museum of Subjugation, Powerless and Elder Abuse?

Posted by: Jo 'Mama' Besser at February 15, 2009 8:16 PM

I saw this. My wife made me. It's actually far worse than this review makes it sound. The real disaster is that the movie had a lot of really talented, funny actors in it, and the had NOTHING to work with. John Goodman, Joan Cusack, Fred Armisen--if they could have just made up S***, instead of speaking the dialogue that was written for them the movie would have been ten times better.

Posted by: Amicus at February 15, 2009 8:35 PM

"I seem to recall Dustin making a similar observation with the timing of Revolutionary Road, i.e. how can you expect your audience to be sympathetic with people who have it all?"

RR failed because it was a deeply flawed, ultimately boring movie that bastardized a fabulous, timeless book. Timing had nothing to do with it. If "The Ice Storm" came out now, it would still be a hit.

Posted by: samantha t at February 16, 2009 8:59 PM

doldurdukça doldurmussun bee oglumm bybe bir jiz ahakkna yazilier mi :)

http://youtubevideo.net

Posted by: thanx at February 18, 2009 7:46 AM

Sophie Kinsella really sold out with this movie. The book was originally set in England. Surely the people who made 'Notting Hill', 'Love Actually' etc would have done it proud. It was nothing like the book, and who the hell cast John Goodman and Joan Cusack - dreadful!! Isla Fisher was 'dwarfed' by those ugly hairy 'shrug' things. I was deeply disappointed.

PS A rubber in the UK is the same thing as an eraser. Just another piece of useless info.

Posted by: Kate (ex-pat) at February 19, 2009 9:36 PM

I read all of the books as I was deployed in Iraq and needed something to do. Loved them so this is why I also watched the movie. Loved it to. Isla Fisher is amazing at comedy and this was something that just brightened my day. I'm not a Shopaholic and could never in my life afford Prada, but that's the fun of a movie. Why should I be reminded of my own economic crisis while I am watching a movie. So I can depressed for two extra hours of my life? By the way who could not say the ginger is hot anymore? I think it is a chick movie though and I was a little irked at first of the location change. Then I was irked in the movie with them using the nicknames of Bex and Suze because of the location change. Got over it though.

I did like what you wrote as much as I disagreed. A lot for the Katherine Heigl comment, maybe these should be paired in a movie now. The cynical and then the sunny. It could be a female version of the Odd Couple.

Posted by: Betty at March 1, 2009 7:22 AM

I think the movie had good bits of comedy.But the ending is not so interesting...You may take your kids to watch this movie together.if I were asked then I would rate it 3.5/5.

Posted by: Barry at March 10, 2009 2:11 AM





Video ads popping up after each page view? Try clearing your browser's cookies.