free counter with statistics Condemned, The | Pajiba - Scathing Reviews for Bitchy People

austin1.jpg
Running Moron

The Condemned / Phillip Stephens

Film Reviews | April 27, 2007 | Comments (36)


Whether through the pixelated gore on our computer screens or the simulated actions of real people in films and television, there always seems to be an ethical discrepancy in using violence for storytelling and entertainment while simultaneously deploring it in “real life.” At what point does entertainment end and dehumanization begin? Much to my alarm, that’s the question that forms much of the premise of The Condemned, the latest offering from the monstrously inept WWE Films.

The concept behind The Condemned — using cons or other degenerates to participate in televised combat — has been thrown around for a while (most noticeably in the Japanese bloodbath Battle Royale), but in light of the unfortunate reality-TV boom and our culture’s heightened sense of voyeurism, it still seems relevant. Given the chance, would we watch real wholesale slaughter? Considering trends in torture porn and internet depravity, we probably would.

But the film can’t decide whether it wants to genuinely explore the idea, or exploit it. As the preview suggests, The Condemned is a thunderously dumb attempt at action grandeur starring an un-emotive mountain of meat who pretends to body-slam people for a living (Steve Austin). As earnest as the filmmakers are when assuming a pose of self-reflexivity about the very violence they portray, that violence is still center stage in the dumbest possible way, with the concept introduced midway through as a pitiful attempt at face-saving validation.

The story: Millionaire mogul and freelance jackass Ian Breckel (Robert Mammone) goes around the globe purchasing death-row criminals (?!) for a hyped internet site that will feature said criminals running around a remote island killing one another as millions theoretically watch and cheer. Among the inmates are eight muscle-bound men and two big-boobed women (?!?!). One of the men happens to be our friend Steve Austin, a special-ops fellow who was abandoned after a mission in Central America. Each con is rigged with an exploding anklet, etc. …

Events play out as you’d expect: The psychos happily begin skewing and asploding one another with stylish glee, until Stevie (I’m assuming he was the protagonist, but he acts with the ability of a tranquilized manatee) turns the tables on both the mean convicts and the show’s sadistic producer. An end is presented as being happy.

It’s only about halfway into The Condemned and during surprising lulls in the exposition that a few characters arrive at the conclusion that this manipulated, televised violence is quite wrong. Whether intentional or not, this backhanded attempt at introspection within an alarmingly bad action film gave me a glimmer of hope that some sincere moral inquiries would start taking place. No such luck. At best, the self-reflection some of the characters begin to feel about violence-as-entertainment is a plot device and little else. After all, could a production company that finances fictional wrestling, not to mention a string of goofy action flicks, genuinely comprehend the irony of decrying the desensitization of violence while doing what they do? Somehow, I doubt it.

Phillip Stephens is the lead critic for Pajiba. He lives in Fayetteville, AR.


Kickin' It Old Skool | Invisible, The



Comments

How does someone pretend to body slam someone, exactly? Through some kind of magic where the recipient somehow creates the illusion of falling?

Posted by: Deviant at April 28, 2007 4:19 AM

I think the magic is within the padded floor, where it creates the illusion of somebody hitting something hard...

LOL@thewrestlingfan.com

Posted by: Professor Science at April 28, 2007 5:49 AM

More like ROFL@thewrestlingfan.com AMIRITE?!

Posted by: Professor Jesus at April 28, 2007 5:50 AM

an un-emotive mountain of meat

Snort. Awesome. Almost as awesome as the title of this review.

Will I get my Pajiba membership revoked--nay, torn out of my grappling hands--if I admit there's a weird small aberrant part of me that wants to see this? In the sense of, "I'll rent it some day when I need some mindless matter set before me?" It's the "Predator" fan in me, I suppose--the inner asshole who convinced me to see "Alien vs" said all those years back. And now I kind of want to see "Running Man" againn.

Posted by: Ranylt at April 28, 2007 7:40 AM

I know the title of this review is supposed to be a play on Running Man, but I instantly started singing in my head: "Runnnnning Mor-on running free/ See the moron, running from the rednecks..."

Posted by: litelysalted at April 28, 2007 8:40 AM

You had me at 'tranquilized manatee.'

Posted by: Gabs at April 28, 2007 9:08 AM

litelysalted, I haven't seen that particular Kids in the Hall bit in near fifteen years and was starting to think I had imagined it. THANK YOU.

Posted by: Any Jackass at April 28, 2007 9:28 AM

Anyone who thinks they might enjoy this should rent the aforementioned Battle Royale instead. It's virtually the same premise only really good, with disaffected Japanese youth with manga haircuts.

Posted by: PaddyDog at April 28, 2007 1:12 PM

Now, don't get me wrong..WWE films are terrible, Austin is a terrible actor, this film appears terrible, and was a bad idea.

But, I always take offense when reviews like this take the low road and cheap-shot wrestling as a whole. At least it stopped with the nonsensical phrase "pretend to bodyslam". "Pretend to fight","pretend to beat people up", anything of the sort, even "bodyslam other willing participants" I could live with in phrasing, but I would still think a reviewer for Pajiba would find something more creative to say.

And to anyone who thinks that a "padded floor" of a ring is soft..I challenge you to check one out sometime, and let someone slam you on one. Some are more padded than others, but take it from me, they hurt.

But you're all too good for fact-checking on something that is so obviously beneath you, right?

Posted by: Rob at April 28, 2007 1:39 PM

I have now had "Running Faggot" stuck in my head for the past five hours. In the car: Running Faggot. At the gym: Running Faggot. In the shower: Running Faggot. Eating lunch: Running Faggot.

Any Jackass- Season 1, Disc 1 episode 6. Go Netflix the shit out of it and relive the glory that is Scott Thompson in a coonskin cap!

Posted by: litelysalted at April 28, 2007 1:52 PM

I have a soft spot for the insanity that is Vinnie Jones, so I will probably see this at some point in the future. I sure as hell won't pay money for it though.

Posted by: Claire at April 28, 2007 1:59 PM

I don't want to see this. I just want to know how it ends. Will someone spoil it for me please?

Posted by: Brianne at April 28, 2007 3:34 PM

As the first poster wrote, it's not pretending if you're actually being slammed against the mat. Also, I'll say this much for those guys, they don't pretend to be anything they are not and they put on a good show FOR THEIR INTENDED AUDIENCE.
This movie is just like that. For me, it's a rental.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at April 28, 2007 5:39 PM

Here you go Brianne:

http://www.themoviespoiler.com/

For all your spoilerific needs. Major props to the the poster who suggested this site on the other article.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at April 28, 2007 5:45 PM

Thanks! I saw that on the other article and read it all the way through. I may never watch another movie again.

Posted by: Brianne at April 28, 2007 6:26 PM

hey rob, it`s rough when you find out your hero`s are a bunch of phonies i.e wrestler`s.get over it dude

Posted by: pasadenamike at April 28, 2007 9:59 PM

So in other words, it's an awful, awful, awful, awful, awful awful, painful rip-off of the wonderful Battle Royale, featuring a cast of human meat slabs jacked up on steroids and enhanced with silicon?

Wow. That is awful. My heart goes out to all of the people who will watch this film, whether they are forced (my condolences, Phillip) or voluntarily choose to go.

Tell me, does the film use a whole lot of catch phrases and "funny" homophobic remarks to better appeal to their target demographics?

And Rob: if the WWE is going to produce trashy films starring their acting-talent deficient wrestlers, than their even worse fake displays of false gratuitous violence are more than fair for comment in a review.

Posted by: Robert at April 28, 2007 11:42 PM

Glad somebody else picked up the BR reference.. when I first saw previews for this movie my first thought was 'Oh great.. first they steal J-horror, now they steal battle royale! what next?'

Posted by: Ray at April 29, 2007 1:16 AM

...acts with the ability of a tranquilized manatee..snorted water out my nose! OUCH!

Posted by: Trixie at April 29, 2007 1:59 AM

I know there is no reason to enter my opinion into the ring on said topic of wrestling, but how is watching professional wrestling any different than watching a movie or television show??

Wrestlers are faking it? So what? As if actors on TV and in films are real and doing something challenging and real? It's entertainment, and I would bet my last dollar that it is easier to be an actor in a film than it is to be a pro wrestler...

Posted by: Some guy at April 29, 2007 3:25 AM

but then again, Steve asutin can't act worth shit, yet he is a "famous" wrestler, so maybe there is something to be said for acting.

Some people were born to play the serious roles, and others were born to play the less erious, more physical ones.

Posted by: some guy at April 29, 2007 3:28 AM

"but then again, Steve asutin can't act worth shit, yet he is a "famous" wrestler, so maybe there is something to be said for acting."

And actors can't wrestle. Neither can the vast majority of people, for that matter. Meanwhile, check out how many wrestling fans happen to read Pajiba. Maybe we're not all idiots, after all.

And for the record, WWE sucks and I don't watch it.

Posted by: Deviant at April 29, 2007 3:52 AM

actually the fictional(?) wrestling finances the production comany

Posted by: dirty sanchez at April 29, 2007 11:18 AM

sorry to be the annoying copyeditor, but:

"...in lieu of the unfortunate reality-TV boom and our culture's heightened sense of voyeurism, it still seems relevant."

You mean "in light of." 'In lieu of' means 'instead of.'

Now return to your regularly scheduled best movie reviews evar.

Posted by: baby tyrone at April 29, 2007 12:38 PM

I can't believe it, this movie makes The Running Man sound like Lawrence of Arabia, that's quiet difficult so I applaud the efforts of the filmmakers. This sounds like one ambitiously retarded movie.

Posted by: Maria at April 29, 2007 9:36 PM

"tranquilized manatee"- that got me in TROUBLE at work! I got coke all over my keyboard by way of my snout, you know. Now I'll have to come off a new keyboard, and also I had to listen to my boss lecture me about using my time more wisely. It was okay, though, because instead of hitting him with my stapler, I channeled my inner tranquil manatee. Thanks, Pajiba!

Posted by: Blackwater Hattie at April 30, 2007 8:56 AM

"Battle Royale" yes--but when I read premises like these, I think back to a much earlier source that--as great as BR is--deserves to be credited.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Most_Dangerous_Game

Posted by: Ranylt at April 30, 2007 9:00 AM

Yet another poor soul in trouble because of the manitee comment over here. I am seriously digging that metaphor.

One good thing has indeed come from this review: I will now go home and freak out my flatmates by watching Running Man (yes I own it, no I refuse to hand in my Pajiba membership card as it was a gift) followed by Battle Royale... bliss.

Posted by: Alex the Odd at April 30, 2007 9:48 AM

Another casualty of the "tranquilized manatee" description here. Can't...breathe...

Posted by: Lisa at April 30, 2007 11:01 AM

so, it's a sucky version of Battle Royale mixed with The Running Man. And it stars a wrestler.

yeah, next please.

Posted by: Steen at April 30, 2007 4:24 PM

I know there is no reason to enter my opinion into the ring on said topic of wrestling, but how is watching professional wrestling any different than watching a movie or television show??

Wrestlers are faking it? So what? As if actors on TV and in films are real and doing something challenging and real? It's entertainment, and I would bet my last dollar that it is easier to be an actor in a film than it is to be a pro wrestler...

It's not different than a movie or TV. It's exactly the same as watching Kicking it Old School, or Norbit, or Night at the Museum or insert shit movie here... It's, as I refer to it, the "de-evolution of man."

Someone referred to "Predator" as a reason to watch this. I LOVE Predator, it's a GREAT action flick. That's like saying you want to see "Wild Hogs" because you loved "Easy Rider."

Reminds me of the joke, "Why do Okies do it doggy style?--- So they both can watch wras-lin'!"

Posted by: Bill Mc at April 30, 2007 11:14 PM

Forgive me screwing up the HTML tags, and not italicizing the entire quote above. Pajibers are a tough crowd, I know.

Posted by: Bill Mc at April 30, 2007 11:17 PM

Wait a minute, wait a minute, wait a minute.
How many other countries even have Death Rows? None in Latin America, for sure. How can the main guy be both "abandoned after a mission in Central America" and on death row? There's no death penalty in Latin America... Right?

Posted by: Gabrielle at May 1, 2007 12:37 PM

Meh, death penalty, American trained and sponsored death-squads, same thing.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at May 2, 2007 10:31 AM

Yeah right, Sea Cow.

Posted by: Loob at May 2, 2007 10:52 PM

and renters insurance http://renters-insurance.beeplog.com >renters nj insurance

Posted by: renters nj insurance at May 6, 2007 1:16 AM