free counter with statistics Click | Pajiba - Scathing Reviews for Bitchy People

clicky.jpg


Click Scores at Box Office; Thousands of Children Cower in Closet

Click / Dustin Rowles

Film Reviews | June 23, 2006 | Comments (59)


Who likes slightly deranged, mildly inappropriate analogies? I know … I know. We all do. Well, here’s one that somebody is bound to take issue with: Click is like an abusive, alcoholic stepfather who gets raging drunk one night and pulls his stepkid out of bed and kicks him down two flights of stairs for forgetting to turn out the light in the kitchen. And when that poor kid finally wakes up, his stepfather is standing above him, breathing his whiskey-and-stale-Pall-Mall halitosis and apologizing for breaking the kid’s arm. Sure, a child with a soft heart will reluctantly forgive and weep into his inebriated stepdad’s embrace, but any adolescent with an ounce of self-respect is going to tell the ol’man to fuck off, and stepdad is gonna toss him over the banister and break the other arm.

Likewise, Click metaphorically tosses us down the stairs with punishingly unfunny attempts at humor, only to steer the film into new, obscenely sentimental territory in a last-minute plea to convince a few soft-hearted theatergoers into forgetting about that elbow bone jutting out of their shoulder and accept the warm embrace of a weepy man-child. And I’ll admit, the apology is almost authentic, if only it weren’t so goddamn profuse — but in the end, all the Capraesque flourishes in the world couldn’t prevent me from calling child services the next morning and demanding that they set me up with Vince Vaughn as my next foster dad, ‘cause at least he sweet-talks me after throwing me down the staircase instead of using my separated shoulder to sob on.

Indeed, for those of you familiar with the Adam Sandler oeuvre, Click offers no new twists on his boundless formula for inexplicable success: Take a worn-out cinematic blueprint; add a midlevel Hollywood starlet on her last legs to act as love interest (Kate Beckinsale, sans black leather); round up the usual bit-part players (Henry Winkler and Rob Schneider); add an “SNL” alum (Rachel Dratch); throw in a classic figure from the ’80s (David Hasselhoff); and then yell at the camera until the morality clause kicks in, forcing Sandler to deliver the film’s gooey message, which is usually something along the lines of “Be nice to your dog, asshole.” And while his filmography has mostly been blandly inoffensive (save for Little Nicky and Mr. Deeds) or even occasionally charming (The Wedding Singer), he’s all but committed blasphemy with Click, using It’s a Wonderful Life as the film’s template, which is a bit like having David Spade playing the lead in The Passion of Christ as far as this critic is concerned. Hell, I’ve got no problem with Sandler borrowing a Burt Reynolds classic or infinitely repeating himself as an actor, but c’mon: Why do you have to mess with It’s a Wonderful Life?

Whatever.

In Click, Sandler yet again plays a sad-sack extraordinaire, this time as an architect who is too preoccupied with his job to notice he’s married to bloody Kate Beckinsale, who in real life probably wouldn’t stub a cigarette out between his eyes. Confused over which remote is supposed to melt the film reel and save us all from the next two hours, he goes off to find a universal one, winding up eventually at Bed, Bath and Beyond, all but revealing where his “magical” Capra moment will begin. There, he bumps into the reliably kooky Christopher Walken, who takes him off to the “Way Beyond” (clever, Adam — did you think that one up yourself?) and offers him a remote that controls his life, allowing him to mute his dog, fast-forward through fights with his wife, and slow-mo his drive through the neighborhood to ogle a jogger’s breasts. But like a TiVo, he discovers that the remote learns from his behavior, and begins fast-forwarding him through large chunks of his existence, stopping only occasionally to allow us all to watch the family dog hump a stuffed duck.

Eventually, Click runs out of neat ways to mine the remote-control humor (and by “neat,” I mean freeze-framing a meeting long enough to flatulate in the Hoff’s face), and Sandler quickly progresses through years and then decades of his life, as the lives around him expire or move on in a stop-motion blur. Actually, the last few minutes quickly call to mind the series finale of “Six Feet Under,” only “SFU” was good, and Click is more like a swift kick in the junk. Indeed, it’s done so goddamn inexpertly that you kind of want to throw yourself down the stairs just to end it all, but anyone who is a sucker for “Merry Christmas, you wonderful old Building and Loan!” may get swept up in the notion just enough to feel a few pricks around your eyelids before getting angry with yourself for falling — even fleetingly — for the hackneyed manipulation.

Still, I suspect that those with irrationally indiscriminate taste in cinema and a heart soft enough to melt under a fluorescent light may forgive the first 100 minutes of tedium, and blubber on their butter-stained seat during the last 10 minutes, resolving themselves — for a few minutes, at least —to be nicer to their dog. And in a way, I suppose, I can envy that sort of simple-minded optimism but, then again, I’m not going home to stare blankly at the Game Show Network while life passes me by. I’m going to watch “Entourage,” instead.

Dustin Rowles is the publisher of Pajiba. He lives in a blue house with his wife in a hippie colony/college town in upstate New York. You may email him, or leave a comment below.


Wordplay | Two Tragedies of Comedy, Act II



Comments

Not that I expected to give the movie a positive review, but your visceral response to it confirms my fear - it's unfunny, pointless, and depressing. I don't have to pay $10 to watch a rerun of Lucky Louie. My money is saved. Unfortunately, the good will Adam Sandler built with me by NOT sleeping with whatshername in Spanglish is not. He's done.

Posted by: Kitty X at June 23, 2006 4:30 PM

I made an oath to myself that I would stop dishing out 12 bucks at the theater to watch the latest Sandler movie after Mr. Deeds. Although I did enjoy P.D.L. I certainly did not hesitate to wait for it on DVD. It's coming to the point where I'm not even sure if Mr. Sandlers lame attempt of Capturing comedic gold is even worth the cost of renting the (almost) guaranteed rubish he keeps signing up for.

Posted by: Surprise Surprise at June 23, 2006 4:35 PM

Ohhh Dustin- low blow to Entourage- uncalled for sir!

One of the great things about this site is that when you review a movie you know is going to blow-you do a really good job in making the review entertaining instead of just going for the obvious "Sandler can't act his way out of a paperbag save 'Punchdrunk Love'" I had no intention of spending 11 bucks in watching this thing and now I am even less inclined to watch it when it is shown in 6 months on PAX.

Author's Note: Not a low blow to "Entourage," Pete. On the contrary, that's exactly how I intend on wasting my life away.

Posted by: Pete at June 23, 2006 4:45 PM

Aww...

Hasn't everyone wished for a pause button on life?
This movie could have been everyone's childhood fantasy come true, but slowing time down to watch some girl's boobs bounce up and down is ridiculous...

This could have been so much better, it hurst my heart

Posted by: Hannah at June 23, 2006 4:49 PM

What's worse -- a movie so awful its viewers are outraged that all those involved in its production had the gall to inflict such a blight on the world, or a movie that makes you feel absolutely nothing, other than boredom and/or stupid?

Posted by: Karina at June 23, 2006 5:04 PM

Excellent review. I can't stand Adam Sandler & his woeful, "retarded obnoxious man-child learns valuable life lesson" comedies. Sandler has never made me laugh, chuckle softly, or even smile for a second. His alleged charms are a total mystery to me. I hope this atrocity tanks badly so we will all be spared his next exercise in lameness.

Posted by: Lenny at June 23, 2006 5:39 PM

Sorry Dustin, I mistook your statement of "And in a way, I suppose, I can envy that sort of simple-minded optimism" as a slight on my fav inside H-wood show. Glad to see that you rage against the dying of the light the same way i do, HBO every Sunday at 10pm!

Posted by: Pete at June 23, 2006 5:58 PM

My father and brother were thinking of going to see this, until I read them the first paragraph. My father looked at me, went ".. well. We won't be going to that." and wandered off. Hilarious review.

Sandler's lost any (as small as it was) respect I had for him from Spanglish (and a tiny bit from Punch-Drunk-Love.)

Posted by: Mara at June 23, 2006 7:01 PM

I knew this would be bad...I have been anticipating the hilarity of my beloved pajiba's review of this movie all week, and you didnt disappoint. Indeed, the analogy was chokingly funny. Thanks Dustin, you've saved me 10 dollars once again!

Posted by: travis at June 23, 2006 7:51 PM

One of the things I love about the reviews are the analogies.

"...which is a bit like having David Spade playing the lead in The Passion of Christ as far as this critic is concerned."

That's priceless!

I never have been an Adam Sandler fan, so this is no great shock to me.

Nothing to see here. Move along!

Posted by: Uncle JRq at June 23, 2006 8:32 PM

Paul Jennings wrote a short story ("Spaghetti Pig-Out") will a similar storyline- a kid gets a remote that controls the world. However unlike this movie, the short story was witty, insightful and enjoyable for all. Why can't Hollywood employ actual writers on films anymore?

Posted by: Tina at June 23, 2006 8:48 PM

Family Guy did the whole Bed, Bath, & "Beyond" joke several years ago.

Posted by: Rob at June 23, 2006 10:37 PM

"Simpsons" did the clockstopper thing too, on a Halloween show a few years ago. Not to mention the godawful, "Clockstoppers". And they probably lifted the idea from an old "Twilight Zone" for all I know...

I refuse to see any movie that Rob Schneider appears in, ever. Thanks for the tip.

Posted by: Dude at June 23, 2006 11:06 PM

Commenter Suprise Suprise claims He "Did not hesitate to wait"? That was funnier than the review for Me.

Posted by: P. Niss at June 23, 2006 11:48 PM

I fuckin' love Entourage. I hope it runs for a long time.

C'mon, Dustin, why so hard on this movie? Were all the funny parts in the trailer, or was there not enough slow motion breasts, again as advertised in the trailer?

Evidently. I hate false advertisement.

Posted by: Justin at June 24, 2006 2:43 AM

Here's how you know a film is lame: when Sandler appears on The Today Show AND Regis & Whatsername directly thereafter, when every fucking time you change the channel THERE HE FUCKING IS, flogging this flaccid 1 inch dick of a movie...

Another case in point: The Lake House. Or Mission Impossible:III -- though, to be fair, it's virtually impossible to use this gauge when it comes to a Cruise flick, because that motherfucker is a tireless promoter REGARDLESS of the quality of whatever cinematic rendering he's touting this time...

If, by the time a film is released in theartes, I know the trailer by heart -- it's going to fucking suck. One has only to see, for the forty-ninth goddamned time -- that ludicrous shot of Sandler's green face in the rearview mirror, to know that THAT is going to be considered the HEIGHT of humour in this ludicrous waste of film stock -- along with, of course, the slo-mo boobies. Oooooh, boobies! God help us all.

Posted by: Maryscott O'Connor at June 24, 2006 3:00 AM

They probably lifted it from an old episode of "I Dream of Jeannie" or "Bewitched". I hope this movie tanks so horribly Adam Sandler gets blacklisted from any upcoming "oafish man-boy-bear-pig" roles.

Can't wait until the Pajiboids review the walking anal hemmorhage "Little Man", by the increasingly unstomachable Wayans Bros. I expect to hold my sides fellas.

Posted by: Jim Vines at June 24, 2006 4:04 AM

Oooh, Tina, I loved that book!

My friends are practically begging me to see this movie. I'll either sit through the entire movie stone faced or I could sit at home in my pjs and watch cartoons. I think I will choose the latter, my pjs are comfy.

*I saw a poster for "Little Man". It reminded me of an episode of the Simpsons...McBain in "My baby is giant, ugly man". Something like that.*

Posted by: Chantelle at June 24, 2006 10:09 AM

kudos to maryscott. god i love a woman who can swaer like a drunken sailor and string a sentence together. i bet your third date movie a guy could get away with fight club or since series had been included deadwood.
yeah its sandler. what is there to expect i dont think iwasted a dime at the movie theaters on him not that i hate him completely but 10 dollars for him is just too much even the wedding singer which i liked

Posted by: jc at June 24, 2006 10:49 AM

I tuned out after the It's a Wonderful Life reference. So far the movies this summer have been a bust for me.

Posted by: Candy at June 24, 2006 4:07 PM

Does the fact that Sandler was popular on SNL and made a bunch of movies mean that viewers are morons or that they like to watch morons? His oeuvre was over, for me, before it started. I CAN NOT watch anything he does, even Letterman appearances, because I'm afraid he'll do schtick and i'll puke.
And, I watch Entourage, but why? Because Piven is great, yes, but what else is it? A pageant of condensed self indulgence that is not even tongue in cheek? Piven's satire works, but there are no laughs except when he works Lloyd over, and the rest of them are just nothing, if, and this is a big if, this is intended to be comedy. Satire doesn't get big laughs, I suppose, but it doesn't sell either, unless it's Peter Sellers. Was that some of kind of unconscious pun?

Posted by: carl orff at June 25, 2006 2:03 AM

You know for years I've marvelled at why on earth America finds Adam Sandler so damn funny. I just don't see it. I can enjoy one or two Jim Carrey movies (although I can certainly see why many find him as annoying) but at least Carey has some talent and skills that most others don't. Sandler.....I truly believe that the average dumb schlub in the street can do the same job he does. Just be annoying, look dumb and pull ridiculous voices that wouldn't convince a child. I just don't see it.

It does good to see that I'm not entirely alone. I just remember watching Billy Madison and seriously wondering if a large chunk of the US movie audiences were as retarded as the lead character. I'm sick and tired of watching no-talent schmucks like this strangle the last drop of life out of what was once the genre of the american comedy, and then watching every beer guzzling frat boy and brainless hick in the country make that drivel a success. For f*uck's sake! STOP!

Oh but of course...the worst part is that after 2 hours of poop/beer/fart/gay/fall-down-jokes....it always turns to f*cking Full House at the end. When does the hurting stop??

Posted by: Dantez at June 25, 2006 4:23 AM

What the hell was the appeal of Full House anyway? (besides of course Lori Loughlin) Bob Saget wasn't sucking dick for coke, and neither were the Olsen twins. Complete waste of thirty minutes a week.

Posted by: Jim Vines at June 25, 2006 5:13 AM

Profusive? PROFUSIVE??? I can't believe there were so few words to describe an Adam Sandler flick that you had to dig up one that was out-of-date in 1861. Why I can think of twenty, all much shorter, right off the top of my head.

Posted by: Smith at June 25, 2006 5:42 AM

Indeed, why waste time being so damned descriptive? What are you, some kind of writer or something? Found a cool word and decided to use it, didya? You've got SOME nerve, Rowles!!

Posted by: sansho1 at June 25, 2006 10:44 AM

I feel at home! I got tore up in a previous forum for not enjoying this movie...
I was very dissapointed, and I'm glad that there's a review that points out the same issues I had with it. The trailer really showed all the funny parts of this movie, and although I wouldn't consider it to be the worst movie I've ever seen, I am woeful for spending 9 bucks on this. I'm also eager for a little man review

Posted by: Jon at June 25, 2006 5:54 PM

I know this is pretty much universal, but I will not stand for Hollywood expecting me to suspend my disbelief for 2+ hours and entertain the idea that somebody as unattractive as Sandler would have even a moment's attention from somebody as attractive as Kate Beckinsale. I know it happens in real life (Heather Locklear/David Spade), but nobody acts as though it's normal. Please, please, please - for once can we have the reverse? Whenever it's the reverse it's the point of the whole damn movie (i.e. Circle of Friends, Muriel's Wedding, etc.).

Posted by: Samantha T at June 25, 2006 7:44 PM

A little math will show that the weekend grosses demonstrate that theater movies are a dying industry, and deservedly so when crap like Click, Waist Deep, and Nacho Libre can make money pandering to undereducated teens and stoned young adults. I never go to the theater for movies, Movieplex, TCM and a couple other channels replay gems of the the last of the real movie industry. The magic of passing time certainly works to filter out the toxic waste and leave the little known gems and masterworks of cinema for the rest of us. Case in point, " The Dogs of War" was on last night. I've seen it twice on the tube and it was even better the second time, even though I still can't figure out why I don't recognize Tom Berenger in it.
Real movies, like "Collateral" are still being made, at the rate of maybe one a year, but if theaters close, i don't know if costs can be recouped going straight to DVD.

Posted by: carl orff at June 26, 2006 12:46 AM

I unfortunally saw this movie. My parents
wanted to go as a "family" so I went.
The movie started off decent, but was
so far fetched and stupid at times,
I wanted to leave. Then randomly the movie
gets depressing for no reason. With better writing
this movie could of been really funny. The whole
fast Forward into the future was down right
ridiculous. The whole auto pilot thing was
annoying. This movie kinda reminded me of a good
movie gone bad, something like "Mean Girls" which
was cute until they went into that whole vicious girls fighting like animals and people gettin hit
by buses. Well if your a Sandler fan like my father then you might look past all the flaws and
enjoy it but I sure didnt.

Posted by: Nikki at June 26, 2006 12:52 AM

'not hesitating to wait' ...now THAT'S comedy

Posted by: boogerface at June 26, 2006 5:36 AM

Ok the movie looks stupid, and apparently is stupid, but all I have to do is think of Punch Drunk Love and my heart, it melts, and once again I can forgive Adam anything. Even this steaming pile of shit.

Posted by: S. at June 26, 2006 9:18 AM

I'm baffled by Beckinsale... did I miss a meeting or something? What happened to her days as a pseudo-indie darling? She just jumped feet first into giant, commercial pieces of crap. Very strange.

I may never watch another Adam Sandler movie again. Ever. I still love my Punch Drunk Love, and Billy Madison, but then I think about everything else and get tired of swallowing my own vomit.

Posted by: TK at June 26, 2006 9:27 AM

I didn't have much desire to see this flick, and after just skimming the review, I'm certainly less likely to even wait for the dvd release. And they pulled X-Men at my local theater to put this drivel on a screen. Bastards.

Posted by: Amanda at June 26, 2006 10:58 AM

You can write all the reviews you want - and I really like them for the most part. But the fact is that the morons will go running off to watch the same old thing, it will make enough money and a year from now there will be another stupid Adam Sandler, Jack Black or Big Momma that will also make money. This will continue until this country becomes one big stupid Megaplex where we all sit mindlessly staring at crap while some smart aliens or orientals come in and take over.

Posted by: Chris X at June 26, 2006 12:59 PM

At the risk of stirring up more Sandler bashing.. am I the only one who liked 50 First Dates? And who finds him attractive?

Posted by: Nadia at June 26, 2006 1:07 PM

Another great review, Dustin. The analogy is right-on. On Saturday, I went to see X3 and peeked in the next theater for the last 10 minutes of Click. The place was packed, and everyone was howling with laughter when the dogs humped the stuffed animal. I bet they also laughed at the slo-mo boobies, like they hadn't seen it 240 times in the trailer.
I guess most people will never call the cops on our figurative cinematic abusive stepfather.

Posted by: wavemaven at June 26, 2006 1:33 PM

He should have stopped after the Red Hooded Sweatshirt song.

Posted by: Natalie at June 26, 2006 1:56 PM

*tiny voice* I did like 50 First Dates... and I think he's sort of dorky-cute. *end of tiny voice*

I'll show myself to the door.

Posted by: Cuca at June 26, 2006 2:09 PM

*tiny voice* I did like 50 First Dates... and I think he's sort of dorky-cute. *end of tiny voice*

I'll show myself to the door.

Posted by: Cuca at June 26, 2006 2:10 PM

I think he's cute too

Posted by: me at June 26, 2006 2:37 PM

meh, he's cute in that helpless baby sort of way

Punch Drunk Love *is* awesome though

Posted by: Karina at June 26, 2006 2:49 PM

I've never been a fan--though I would pay money to watch the great Bob Barker beat the shit out of him repeatedly with a golf club....

I never even "got" his humor on SNL--I mean, Canteen Boy??? Please! You just had to feel sorry for Alec Baldwin for doing that skit where he had to put the moves on him in front of the campfire....shudder....

Posted by: Courtney at June 26, 2006 3:43 PM

Adam Sandler did okay in The Wedding Singer, which I thought was actually pretty charming, being a child of the 80s and all...Punch Drunk Love was REALLY good, and suprised the shit out of me, 'cause I had NO idea Sandler could act in something so offbeat, much like Jim Carrey in Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Time...you forget these fools can do good drama/comedy weird films. Click looked dumb from the get go...for some odd reason it got a good review in the SF Chronicle...so obviously someone fell hard for the Sandler schtick...maybe it's the whole novelty of speeding up your life....which has been done before, apparently...ah well...

Posted by: Gina at June 26, 2006 4:24 PM

I saw this movie last night. My hubby is a big fan of this kind of comedy, and I like mindless entertainment now and again myself. But oh dear. I knew it would be bad when they started in with the universal remote crap within the first 2 minutes. Don't give us any time to get to know the characters, telegraph every punch, and rely on the same lame jokes over and over and over - yep, that's a recipe for suck.

Posted by: Kristin at June 26, 2006 4:30 PM

I liked 50 First Dates, but I think it was because of Drew Barymore more so than Adam. I've never found Adam Sandler attractive. It's weird how many comedians aren't necessarily physically attractive. A good one, though, can be extremely attractive. Which Sandler is not. Just not into his (or his ilk) infantile, sad-sack (per Dustin) brand of humor.

Posted by: Daphne at June 26, 2006 6:20 PM

I admit that the Barker Beat-down was very funny. Otherwise, I withdraw my membership from Sandler fandom.

Also, Dustin, love your analogies, but did this one have to be quite so graphic? Separated shoulder? Jutting elbow bones? Good God, Man! Did you check out Faces of Death before writing the review?

Posted by: MaiGirl at June 26, 2006 6:57 PM

Adam Sandler is NOT attractive...but I did like 50 1st Dates...and Big Daddy. Won't like this when my girlfriend forces me to watch it on DVD...although I may have to put it on slo-mo when the tit bouncing scene comes up to see if I can rend a big hole in time and space...

Posted by: altan at June 26, 2006 7:11 PM

Great review. I was going to actually pay 15 bucks to see this film but now i think i'll just download it. ;-)

For the record... Sandler is not hot. I repeat, Not Hot.

Posted by: Tash at June 27, 2006 6:11 AM

the pr0n "remakes" of Click will be priceless though.

Posted by: SteveA at June 28, 2006 8:13 AM

No way I would bother with this. The only Sandler movie I have seen was "Big Daddy". Not bad, but certainly not "Citizen Kane". Never liked this slob, or found him even vaguely funny. I recall first hearing some "Sandler Shtick" on the radio, and all he did was whine something to the effect that "the kids will pick on me. Nobody likes me." Never even thought of cracking a smile. Until I changed the station. Then I remember laughing and crying tears of joy at my escape...

Posted by: robby at June 28, 2006 8:54 PM

Speaking of analogies...
Sandler/Beckinsale? He is SO Popcorn to her Soda. As in, the pre-movie ad where Soda and Popcorn are on a date and Soda has the bedroom eyes and the sexy lips and Popcorn is all bulbous-nosed and doofy. Soda would NEVER go on a date with popcorn. Who are they kidding?

Posted by: Go Big Red at June 29, 2006 1:48 PM

$40 million opening weekend? Who the hell is paying for this garbage?

"...boundless formula for inexplicable success." You hit that on the head D. I think Sandler could triple his income if he wrote a book explaining how he continues to get people to pay money for a big, pile of steamy shit.

When has Sandler been funny? Opera Man? Crazy pickle chin guy?

On a side note...can movies and tv shows please get a dose of "out of his league" reality? Sandler is hideous at best, and we're suppose to believe he's bedding down Kate Beckinsale? Mmmmmmmmk.

If I get my hands on one of those reality remote controls, I'm pausing time immediately so I can find and give a back hand slap to all those people that keep putting money in Sandler's pocket. *SMACK!*

Time to watch some Entourage!

-My Daily Zen.com

Posted by: Master Zen at June 29, 2006 3:09 PM

Go Big Red - that is one of the funniest comparisons I've ever heard. Hysterical!

Posted by: Samantha T at June 29, 2006 4:20 PM

I just saw this movie, and I must say I found it rather enjoyable. It did seem to become overly sentimental out of nowhere, but I dont think Adam Sandler was aiming for any "oscar" film with this. (Then again when craxh wins best picture, who knows.) We need a stupid Adam Sanlder movie every now and then.

Posted by: Dinka at July 2, 2006 5:03 PM

I want to Download the whole movie on this site please.

Posted by: Spencer Limbach at August 12, 2006 4:24 PM

This movie is full of stoopid, fully blown Hollywood goofs and it does get slow at times but that doesn't stop this from being rather enjoyable. Maybe I found it rather enjoyable because I was expecting something much worse from seeing the previews. The whole concept of the movie is far from ground breaking. Its the same old moral of finding time for love in a world dictated by money. Its Scrooge for the new generation with lots of dumb jokes thrown in. I knew that pajiba would completely kill the movie but in my opinion it didn't deserve it. On the other hand, I'm glad you will eventually be slaughtering Little Man. I have been unfortunate enough to watch a preview to this one. The only question that remains is Will it be worse (is that possible?) than any of the Scary Movies, Date Movies and Deuce Bigalows of this world?

Posted by: Chris at October 13, 2006 4:19 PM

I thought the idea was good, a parallel for how most people live their lives...on automatic pilot,tuning out whenever something isn't exciting enough. People have great difficulty living in the moment, always yearning for the better future, wasting what they have. However, the writing was sloppy, disjointed and seemed like a first draft, and the acting was dreadful, Kate Beckinsale was pretty good though and Christopher wasn't too bad. It's unfortunate they wasted a good premise on such a tacky production.

Posted by: Bonnie at November 6, 2006 8:33 PM

I've almost lost friends because of this movie. If someone tells me they want to see "click", it ALMOST revolts me as much as when someone informs me that they love Tyler Perry films.

So, one of my friends (still a friend... barely haha), invited me and Justin (both of us would at least like to think of ourselves as decent movie connoisseurs) to go see "Click" on opening weekend. At this friendly request I vomited a little bit in my mouth. We both declined of course, knowing that it was going to be shit from just watching the trailers. Well it turns out that this friend ended up taking a whole crowd. What a bunch of suckers. I'm glad that most of them were mere "aquaintances" and not genuine friends.

This kinda movie (and those fucking Tyler Perry disgraces) tend to make me feel weird, just like Nickelback music does. It's not JUST that it is a shitty band or movie, but it's that they get rich so damn easily, when other hard working talent goes virtually unnoticed. I guess we have to have a few of these shameful movies to keep money flowing into L.A. so they can afford to make the occasional masterpiece. It is movies like "click" and "Madea's Family Reunion" that feel like a slap-in-the-face to my inteligence, just like the article in my college's recent publication that complains about our new student I.D. numbers being difficult to memorize. Hollywood is telling me I'm supposed to pay money to see "click"!? College students are complaining about memorizing a 6 digit number!? What the hell! Please don't associate me with these helpless masses.

enough of my analogies...Dustin Rowles' are better.

P.S. I'll admit that I loved "Punch Drunk Love"

Posted by: Todd at November 12, 2006 9:04 PM

Too long, too borish, the only reason to see even a second of this movie is the cameo by Nick Swardson as the Bed, Bath, and Beyond employee, he's straight-up hysterical... "I was just watching you sleep."

Posted by: Mike at November 20, 2006 2:54 PM