cars1-thumb.jpg
And They Rode On in the Friscalating Dusklight

Cars / Daniel Carlson

Film Reviews | June 9, 2006 | Comments (46)


There’s now no shortage of hoopla surrounding a Pixar release. Ever since the studio unveiled Toy Story in 1995, the first feature film to be completely rendered with computer animation, they’ve been on an unstoppable creative hot streak, churning out dependable family films loaded with memorable characters that had corporate partner Disney salivating even as Pixar was taking Disney’s place in the public consciousness as the go-to source for family entertainment. Disney has desperately tried to play catch-up, most noticeably with CGI fare like Chicken Little, but Disney is unable to grasp the simple philosophy that sets Pixar apart from the flock: Namely, that Pixar holds the story in highest regard and lets the animation flow from that. It’s unlikely the company will ever top 2004’s The Incredibles, Brad Bird’s wonderfully crafted take on a postmodern family of superheroes, but John Lasseter’s Cars is a more than worthy addition to the brand. It’s a consistently entertaining comedy that mixes humor aimed at kids and parents with a relentless energy and an almost poignant look at the evolution of America, and Americana, in the 20th century.

Hot-rod race car Lightning McQueen (Owen Wilson) is an all-star rookie poised to win the coveted Piston Cup. The film opens with a race, and it’s evident from the start that Pixar has once again taken another leap forward with the stunning physics of their animated images. Monsters, Inc. captured the millions of tiny hairs on Sulley’s body, Finding Nemo offered a beautifully fuzzy portrait of undersea life, and The Incredibles brought new depth and texture to land and water. But Cars is a revolution in light, a glistening picture of chrome and paint and sun on the windshield; there’s an effervescence in the way these machines move that makes their personalities immediate and distinct, as well as a palpable joy in watching them soar around the track (on Lightyear tires, of course). Lightning blows out two tires and manages to tie the race with the King (Richard Petty), the noble and long-time champ, and Chick Hicks (Michael Keaton), the arrogant also-ran who’s out to destroy Lightning because, well, movies like this need a clear-cut villain. Lightning’s an ego-driven kid with dreams of celebrity and women, but Wilson plays him with a cheery innocence that keeps him from being anything more than playfully misguided.

A tie-breaking race is set for a week later in California, but through a series of mishaps, Lightning finds himself stranded in the defunct town of Radiator Springs, surrounded by stretches of empty desert and a piece of Route 66, and it’s here that Lasseter begins to develop his tale. Lasseter also wrote and directed Toy Story and its sequel, as well as A Bug’s Life, and he used each film to explore the tension between the past and the future, between the idyllic times that have shuffled off and the encroaching unknown, as full of possible gloom as it is of happiness and renewal. The introduction of Buzz Lightyear to the peaceful balance of young Andy’s toy room was eventually resolved only when Buzz came around and adapted to the ways of Woody and the rest of the gang. Buzz and Woody didn’t even come to any kind of ideological agreement, but merely bonded because each saved the other’s life. In Cars, Lasseter takes that respect for the past and amplifies into full-blown adulation, as he focuses his rose-colored lens on Radiator Springs and turns it into a stand-in for every once-good thing now lost. The town is full of colorful characters who get along peacefully, and everyone has a place: a doctor, a body shop, a gas station, a motel. Like most portraits of Rockwellian America, it never really existed, but that’s not the point. The point is that it exists here for Lasseter, as the hub of the story and the most important character in the film.

Lightning accidentally tears up the main street when he arrives in Radiator Springs, and after being arrested and impounded, he’s sentenced by Doc Hudson (Paul Newman), acting as judge, to repair the damaged road. At first furious with the punishment and the likelihood that he’ll miss the race, Lightning begins to slowly warm to the townsfolk, including the tow truck, Mater, as in Tow-Mater, voiced by Larry the Cable Guy. And here’s where down becomes up, black becomes white, and 2+2= chair; I found myself laughing at Mater’s comic relief. I actually enjoyed a comedic performance by Larry the Cable Guy. I know what the few remaining readers who didn’t just punch their computers are thinking: How? Why? Well, most of it has to do with the fact that Larry’s not doing his material (which I find to be pretty insipid and responsible for all manner of social evils) but reciting Lasseter’s jokes, which tend to be pretty serviceable. But it’s also because, well, Larry fits the film’s profile. The entire story is set in the world of competitive racing, making Cars easily the most country film yet from Pixar or Disney. (The best “Southern” moment comes when Lightning is hit with stage fright before addressing a crowd of fans and sponsors, at which point a faint voice breaks the crowd’s brief silence by shouting “Free Bird!”) The soundtrack has watered-down country-pop group Rascal Flatts covering “Life Is a Highway,” which was already pretty mediocre, as well as two songs from Brad Paisley; even the requisite Randy Newman tune is performed by James Taylor, as Lasseter and company jettison the coastal pop of Newman’s voice for the dulcet tenor of the man who once sang “Sail on home to Jesus, won’t you good girls and boys” as he talked of the virtues of “walking on a country road.” Point being: If the tow truck were voiced by anyone other than Larry, it just wouldn’t work.

Radiator Springs also introduces Lightning to a Porsche named Sally (Bonnie Hunt), the requisite love interest for family films like this one; unfortunately, it’s never addressed what it is these cars do when they actually hook up, though I’d imagine the mechanics are frightening. In fact, basic reproduction or creation isn’t mentioned once, not even obliquely, as in hearing Lightning say something along the lines of, “I’ve been dreaming of the Piston Cup since I rolled off the assembly line.” Nope. Not a thing. It’s all in line with Lasseter’s idealized world, though there are plenty of other nods to current pop culture, such as the tramp stamp above Sally’s rear bumper that Lightning refers to as a “pinstripe tattoo.” There’s also a brief shot on a TV of the California governor, a Hummer who speaks with a thick Austrian accent. But the funniest metacultural tie-in is Lightning’s agent, Harv, voiced by Jeremy Piven, who tosses off platitudes and Yiddish slang in true Ari Gold style. Unlike the crass overtures from DreamWorks animation, the multilevel jokes here work by being funny, not forcefully blue.

It’s apparent from about four minutes in that the film will end exactly as you think it will. Lightning learns the true meaning of friendship from the cars of Radiator Springs, who show up to help him win the big race. When they finally arrive, Lightning exclaims “I can’t believe this,” but Wilson can’t quite sell the line. Of course he can believe his friends showed up. That’s what they do, especially in stories like this one. And before you know it, the race ends, and regardless of the outcome, you can be sure Lightning becomes a better person in the process.

The main plot of Cars is ultimately irrelevant, or at least would be interchangeable with any of a dozen similar story lines. The heart of the story is Lasseter’s open pining for the way things used to be, when people drove “not to make great time, but to have a great time.” In a nod to Steinbeck, the inhabitants of Radiator Springs refer to Route 66 as the “Mother Road,” and for Lasseter, it’s the strip of highway that gave birth to everything from our love of the automobile to modern America itself. The truest, most heartwarming scene in Cars comes when Lightning repaves the busted street through town and all the shops turn on their newly repaired neon signs, and the cars cruise slowly up the strip while the Chords’ “Sh-Boom” wafts on the night air. If we could slow down enough to see what we’ve been missing, well, life would be a dream, sweetheart.

Daniel Carlson is the L.A. critic for Pajiba and a copy editor at a Hollywood industry magazine. You can visit his weblog, Slowly Going Bald.


Prairie Home Companion, A | My Name Is ... My Name Is ... Pajiba!





Comments

great royal tennenbaums reference.

i'm glad this movie was another solid pixar film- we could all use one amid horrors like snakes on a plane...

Posted by: Anonymous at June 9, 2006 10:55 PM

i loved the film. Good review!

S.H.
Editor
www.moviepicturefilm.com

Posted by: Scott at June 9, 2006 11:49 PM

An over-analyzed reference:

Paul Newmann sentencing someone else to repave a road...? Just as long as I got my plastic Jesus.

Posted by: ronak01 at June 10, 2006 12:16 AM

Whoops, one "n", not two.

Posted by: ronak01 at June 10, 2006 12:18 AM

2+2= chair

What comedian does that bit?

Posted by: Anonymous at June 10, 2006 12:43 AM

When I saw the teaser for this last year I almost puked in my theatre seat (oh God, a movie about talking CARS?!?), but any movie that gets an even mediocre review on this site must be pretty good. Can't wait to see it.

Posted by: Anonymous at June 10, 2006 3:25 AM

I think that particular phrase was done by David Cross in "Shut Up You F*****g Baby"

Posted by: aratweth at June 10, 2006 8:10 AM

This will be my 3 and a half year old's first movie theater experience. I'm so glad it will be a good one!

Posted by: Jen at June 10, 2006 8:17 AM

I have never heard the term "tramp stamp" before, and upon clicking the link I was given the most hilarious entry to Wikipedia ever written. You really do learn things every day...

Posted by: Nico at June 10, 2006 11:46 AM

Hahaha i concur Nico: "In Germany, a lower back tattoo is known as an 'Arschgeweih,' meaning 'ass antlers.'"

Posted by: charlie at June 10, 2006 2:08 PM

Hahaha i concur Nico: "In Germany, a lower back tattoo is known as an 'Arschgeweih,' meaning 'ass antlers.'"

Posted by: charlie at June 10, 2006 2:08 PM

In fact, basic reproduction or creation isn't mentioned once, not even obliquely, as in hearing Lightning say something along the lines of, "I've been dreaming of the Piston Cup since I rolled off the assembly line." Nope. Not a thing.

There actually is one small reference. I can't remember which character said it, but I distinctly remember laughing at one car telling another, "You'd better thank you manufacturer."

Posted by: Amber at June 10, 2006 2:17 PM

"Now, everyone knows that Custard dies at Little Bighorn. What this book presurposes is... maybe he didn't?"

Great review, by the way. Looking forward to this one.

Posted by: Nat at June 11, 2006 1:19 AM

One of the funniest moments for me occured when a little one voiced his approval for this movie by proclaiming, "We *HAVE* to get this movie" loudly enough for the surrounding audience to hear! I found CARS to be charming and it contains many funny bits...Pixar has worked its magic again. I don't even enjoy Nascar racing and so I can only imagine what big fans will be feeling as they are treated to this superbly crafted movie. Oh, and stay for the credits...the audience was howling with laughter!

Posted by: WildRose at June 11, 2006 6:51 AM

I just didn't like it too much. There were lots of very very funny lines, and yes, the visuals were very pretty, but overall, it left me cold. I loved the Incredibles, and I get teary eyed over the dumbest things, but I had no involvement whatsoever with this movie. I think it was because, deep down, I couldn't care about cars (as opposed to say, people or animals). Also, the moralizing got to me. Why, in movies like this, must the reformed character give up his chance at fame and fortune in order to have friends? (Believe me, I'm not spoilering it. It's obvious from the first frame.) Why is the message always that success is completely incompatible with happiness? It runs counter to the message of the Incredibles, which basically argued that it's okay, even *good*, to be special, to be better than someone at something. I know, it's a kids movie, but I expected more. The movie didn't make sense even in its own terms.

Posted by: Loretta Pontillo at June 11, 2006 1:22 PM

Point being: If the tow truck were voiced by anyone other than Larry, it just wouldn't work.


I Must say I find it kinda sad that Pixar followed the celebrity voice trend. Although they didn't go for such big names. And I actually like Owen Wilson. But still, I find this... distracting.


Maybe Larry the Cable Guy does a good job (the trailer bits are indeed spot on) but, seriously, who can't pull a redneck impersonation?

Posted by: Sunsneezer at June 11, 2006 11:52 PM

So...first you get me to break my Tom Cruise boycott with MI:3 and now you convince me to see a movie with Larry the Cable Guy in it....wow I hate myself.

Posted by: Joe at June 12, 2006 12:07 AM

I've been a car geek since I was very young and am so taken with Doc Hudson in the movie...my dad had a 50 Hudson 4door sedan. **mild spoilers**Pixar makes great movies, but the car geek part of me loves this movie, for its car references: the desert scenes with car hoods/fenders as the mountains and buttes, Ramone having a different low-rider color every scene and the "Lightyear" blimp over the race track and so many others. I thought the same thing as the kid mentioned above--we have to get this movie...and I live alone :) Thanks for the great review.

Posted by: mike adams at June 12, 2006 12:19 AM

"I Must say I find it kinda sad that Pixar followed the celebrity voice trend..." Um, didnt Pixar's first movie feature Tom Hanks (who I'm pretty sure was bigger then than Owen Wilson is now ^_^) If you ask me, Pixar STARTED the celebrity voice trend, though they didnt follow it in every movie that they did.

Posted by: Anonymous at June 12, 2006 3:07 AM

Hello!!! Does no one recognize this story? At least with other pixar fares the story lines have been somewhat original. This is just a rehashing of Doc Hollywood with a new coat of paint (pun intended)!

Sure, the graphics rock and, hey, it's Pixar. But other than that, it is a thinly veiled Doc Hollywood, right down to a G-rated version of this chick coming out of the lake naked by showing the tramp-stamp (or ass antlers, I love that one) on the back of the car.

Speaking of G rating, how did they pull that one off with the MPAA with not one but TWO uses of a word that would get their target audience's mouth washed out with soap?

Posted by: GeekDaddy at June 12, 2006 10:21 AM

"What's 2+2? JELLO!" Chris Rock's stand up.
By the way, everyone wave goodbye to Larry the Cable Guy as he fades into memory . . .

Posted by: Kballs at June 12, 2006 11:22 AM

Thinly veiled Doc Hollywood? So what? West Side Story was an even more transparent version of Romeo and Juliet, but it was still magnificent.

My wife and I loved it. We laughed from start to finish and had a great time all the way around.

Sit as close to the front as you can and the animation will blow your hair back!

Posted by: Dr Tom at June 12, 2006 12:44 PM

West Side Story was supposed to be a modern adaptation of Romeo and Juliet; Laurents, Sondheim and Bernstein didn't pretend like it was an original idea.

Thanks for the review. I really enjoyed all the previous Pixar movies, but all the previews for this one make it look pretty mediocre. This review and all the comments have me curious, though, so now I'll have to see it!

Posted by: Alexis at June 12, 2006 2:07 PM

OK, riddle me this.

You said in the beginning of the review "Pixar holds the story in highest regard and lets the animation flow from that."

But then, in your closing paragraph, say "The main plot of Cars is ultimately irrelevant, or at least would be interchangeable with any of a dozen similar story lines."

Aren't these contradictory statements?

Posted by: Big Daddy at June 12, 2006 4:26 PM

Nico:

You should try the links at the bottom of the Wikepedia entry. If you were amused by the tramp stamp, chances are you'll be delighted by the definitions for "muffin top" and "whale tail." Also enjoy the link to "buttock cleavage."

Posted by: AM at June 12, 2006 4:42 PM

Pixar is picking up where the Disney dynasty of quality, animated films had left off.

Haven't seen this one yet - but it sounds like Cars will be just as enjoyable as Pixar's previous gems; Nemo & The Incredibles...even if Larry the Retard is attached.


- MyDailyZen.com

Posted by: Master Zen at June 12, 2006 7:49 PM

Um, didnt Pixar's first movie feature Tom Hanks (who I'm pretty sure was bigger then than Owen Wilson is now ^_^) If you ask me, Pixar STARTED the celebrity voice trend, though they didnt follow it in every movie that they did.

That's right. I've been too impressed by the Incredibles to remember anything else I guess.
That maybe why I was left deeply uninvolved and often bored through the mandatory dialogues and love interest building of Cars. It's still worth it for the amaxing visuals and the extraordinary animation with all the possible sense of speed / weight and emotions. Also the opening short was awesome.

Posted by: Sunsneezer at June 13, 2006 12:17 AM

Was I the only person who loved the short before the film? Those are the real reason I love Pixar movies. Something about them just gets me all geared up to watch the feature. This one was pretty good, doesn't top my personal favorite of the birds on a powerline (what was that for? Toy Story? Can't recall) but it's a nice bonus.

Posted by: Mara at June 13, 2006 11:25 AM

I haven't read the article yet, but kudos on the title. I love that damn Wes Anderson.

Posted by: sdvora at June 13, 2006 4:07 PM

Mara, I think the birds on a power line is the short for Monsters, Inc.

Posted by: Chantelle at June 14, 2006 5:37 AM

Damn, do I love that movie. Wait, what? "Cars"? Oh, I hadn't gotten past the title yet. Marry me, Owen.

Posted by: Abbey Road at June 14, 2006 9:13 AM

I saw this movie last night and i LOVED IT. I'm sure this is some kind of blasphemy but I think i might be the only person in the world that didn't really like the incredibles, not that it wasn't a good movie but I just have no desire to watch it again. Cars was very entertaining and something I will definitely watch again. i think i might have understood more of it if i knew ANYTHING about Nascar but i still really enjoyed it. even with larry the cable guy who not in animated version i despise. Plus, the short before the movie was amazing! and the part during the credits was even better!

Posted by: jmurae at June 14, 2006 12:20 PM

I will go see it, but how on God's Green Earth does Owen Wilson get equal billing with Paul Newman? Lead role or not. It's Paul Freakin' Newman!

Posted by: Cosmic Bob at June 14, 2006 5:53 PM

Paul Newman is doing the voice for one of the cars! Blasphemy! I am appalled, how could he?!? As for Owen Wilson, totally expected, blah...

Posted by: Gina at June 15, 2006 9:02 PM

Overall it was a good movie. Maybe a tad too long for the younger youngsters. My kids got bored about 3/4 of the way through, when all the romantic stuff was happening. But the end brought them back around.

Posted by: bob at June 19, 2006 3:01 PM

Saw the movie based on the review: spot on. I've been telling everyone, its the best G Rated movie I have ever seen. And i'm pushing 30! And Daniel's right: the humor is funny because it is actually funny, not dirty but clean enough that the kids just don't 'get' it. it's smart funny at parts. I am DEFINITELY going to purchase this when its available, if for no other reason but the "get a good look, city boy" scene. I think my date and i were the only people in the theatre to 'get' the joke, but we couldn't stop laughing for minutes!

Posted by: Kevin at June 19, 2006 6:08 PM

I loved that, unlike all the other Pixar or Dreamworks flicks, I did not hear one gratuitous 'Shut Up' in the dialogue (do you really need to use that word when a large segment of your audience is 3 years old) and that there was not one moment that could be construed as violent or scary. I loved Incredibles, but I can't let my 2 year old son watch some of the violent parts. My son loved Cars and sat in rapt attention the entire two hours. My husband and I found it truly entertaining and funny. Visually, it's mindblowing.

Posted by: Angela at June 20, 2006 5:07 PM

I just saw it and I loved it. It was just plain fun, even when you could see the ending coming.

As for celebrity voices, I really enjoyed some of the minor roles and cameos that were obvious once you heared them. I mean really, why would you make a movies about cars and not have the Magliozzi brothers (Click and Clack from "Car Talk") play a couple of talkative brothers? Bob Costas and DW as race commentators? Petty and Junior as race cars? As with Larry the Cable Guy, it's not distracting and it all works because they are just being themselves.

Posted by: Country Jim at June 20, 2006 11:07 PM

How could Paul Newman voice one of the cars? Obviously you know very little about Paul Newman off the big-screen....

As for the Doc Hollywood thing... I wouldn't be surprised if they referenced it consciously or otherwise, but to imply that Doc Hollywood invented the fish-out-of-water story and that it can never be used again without being a blatant copy-cat... I'm just not sure I buy it. But then again, there was a Porsche in that movie too. By God it's the same damn movie!

Posted by: Eep at June 23, 2006 1:38 PM

Almost forgot to say that I love racing and I LOATHE NASCAR and I don't take everything you guys say as gospel, but you said the right things to convince me that this is going to be worth seeing and that makes me really really pissed off, so thanks for that. THPBT! :-P

Posted by: Eep at June 23, 2006 1:39 PM

Man, I'm so ashamed of myself. I saw the movie last night and was convinced Doc Hudson was voiced by Rip Torn. But then I came home and checked IMDb and was horribly ashamed. Especially considering Cool Hand Luke is one of my favorite movies. I guess I just wasn't expecting Paul Newman.

Posted by: Lucie at July 4, 2006 1:23 PM

Why, in movies like this, must the reformed character give up his chance at fame and fortune in order to have friends? (Believe me, I'm not spoilering it. It's obvious from the first frame.) Why is the message always that success is completely incompatible with happiness? It runs counter to the message of the Incredibles, which basically argued that it's okay, even *good*, to be special, to be better than someone at something. I know, it's a kids movie, but I expected more. The movie didn't make sense even in its own terms.



Posted by: Loretta Pontillo at June 11, 2006 01:22 PM




The movie may not make sense on your terms. The entire point of the movie (and a great many like it) is that true success is a loyal friend by your side, responsibility, selflessness, etc., etc., as opposed to winning trophies, getting sweet sponsor deals, movie roles, blah blah blah. Lightning didn't care about worldly "success" after a certain point.



*spoiler below*



The film really hits this hard when Chip wins and *demands* his accolades only to have the confetti and the trophy practically thrown at him in disgust. He's got the physical goods, but you can't say it was a satisfying success. Hell, Dinoco opted for Lightning in spite of the actual winner. In essence, the reformed hero made off with both the moral and the physical rewards! If I may suppose for a second, I'd also say he's in his racing prime and his career is far from over.

Posted by: Jesse at September 18, 2006 12:02 AM

There's some great easter eggs in the background. My favorite was the Cadillac Ranch.

Car reproduction nagged at me a bit, too, but the real hitch for me was, why do these vehicles have doors and interiors?

Yes, this was basically a remake of Doc Hollywood. Don't care. I liked this better than DH. It's a very comfortable movie, with a very comfortable story.

Posted by: refugee at October 26, 2006 9:49 PM

I know I'm behind the curve on this one... but I just saw this movie and must say it was one of the best flicks, family or otherwise, I've seen in a long time.

I really liked the historical-ish story line and think it's probably the most education children of today will ever receive re the shaping of America with respect to interstate travel. The interstate really made a huge impact on American life... I'm sure I don't even understand it all (yet), but this movie makes me want to. I'll definitely be picking up some books on how things were and the catalysts of change in this once great nation.

Animation was also spectacular, and (I hate to admit) I liked Larry the Cable Guy's humor, too! Ultimately I was impressed that a quasi-historical movie could be so entertaining and fun.

Posted by: me at December 5, 2006 2:25 PM

Today was a complete loss, but oh well. I don't care. So it goes. Nothing going on , but shrug. Not much on my mind these days. Such is life.

Posted by: Spambots at May 2, 2007 5:15 AM

Needle exchange programs help to prevent

Posted by: bent spank at May 25, 2007 7:07 PM





Video ads popping up after each page view? Try clearing your browser's cookies.