posey.jpg

Pocket Full Of Posey

Broken English / Constance Howes

Film Reviews | July 19, 2007 | Comments (31)


This movie hit really close to home. Before the film, I scouted out a less than sticky seat, scrawled Broken English on a sheet of loose leaf and made ready to blindly scribble exceedingly insightful notes like “Love P. Posey’s dress! H&M?” Not five minutes into the picture, I abandoned the notepad (later to be found on the floor atop a lump of chewed candy. Yummy!) and felt a decidedly strong compulsion to somehow merge my awkward self into the fabric of the chair supporting me. Not to get all true confessions on you, but it’s more than mildly embarrassing to watch your own issues flicker across the big screen.

Nora Wilder (Parker Posey) is a single gal living alone in NYC. She works PR at a hotel, takes Pilates classes, has a best friend and terrible luck in relationships. And when I say terrible luck what I really mean is terrible decision-making skills. One of the first scenes of the film is at the fifth wedding anniversary of Nora’s two closest friends, Mark (Tim Guinee) and Audrey (Drea de Matteo) Andrews. The posh couple stands before a large crowd of party-goers to profess their marital bliss and thank Nora for introducing them. Nora smiles, and in this brief moment, Posey manages to look grateful, embarrassed and hurt in one fell swoop. It’s breathtaking. Later that same evening, Nora’s Mom corners her at the party and suggests that introducing Mark and Audrey was probably the wrong course of action considering Nora’s still-single-at-30-status: “The good ones get snapped up so quickly at your age.” (Thanks, Nora’s Mom.)

With her emotional slipcovers appropriately stained, director Zoe R. Cassavetes takes us through a day in Nora’s ho-hold the hum-life. In a voice frosted with sugar substitute, Nora fields calls from high profile to high-maintenance hotel patrons. One such guest is actor Nick Gable (Justin Theroux). Typically, I would be entertained watching Justin Theroux flip through a magazine, but outfitted with a mo-hawk and Kumbaya beads, man-skankdom rolls from his character in giant waves of relationship red alert. This is, however, precisely why Nora accepts his invitation to dinner. She drinks too much, compliments him overly, and winds up shame-walking home the next morning. Even more depressing is that Nora is so desperate to prove her entanglement that she brags to both her friends and parents that Nick is her “new boyfriend.” Don’t get me wrong. Nora isn’t some starry-eyed moron who mistakes sex for love. She’s just so-bone-tired of constant pressure to have and be something she currently is not that she wigs slightly. My pain? Check. Strumming it? Check.

After the inevitable realization that Nick is not so nice, Nora withdraws even further into anxious, stagnant introspection. She spends time with blonde, beautiful Audrey who at first glance appears to be the kind of woman relationship success comes easily to. During one of their wine and whine sessions, Nora mentions her insecurity about being alone, but both women immediately brush it off as “absurd and ridiculous.”

This is probably a good time to bring up the obvious: Parker Posey is gorgeous. Every man I’ve ever met, including my Dad, has said something about Posey along the lines of, “I want to have 10,000 of Parker Posey’s babies.” So, it’s more than a stretch to watch her bemoan singledom. However, Broken English has less to do with datelessness and more to do with the idea that women, no matter how modern or self-reliant, feel some pressure to be in a defined relationship. Because being in a committed relationship suggests a measure of mental health and personal worth that singles are, by definition, not capable of, right? Nora even comments “I think I must be doing something horribly wrong, but I don’t know what it is.”

The only thing really wrong with Nora is that she doesn’t trust herself. Spending all her time worrying about not being something squashes her chances of becoming anything. The real moments of progression in the film are those in which Nora exhausts her own anxieties, ceases her maudlin mania and begins to actually do stuff other than complain. At one point, she flies solo to the party of a creepy co-worker and meets a devastatingly charming Frenchman (Melvil Poupaud). Embarking on a brief (and oh-so-adorable) affair with the straw fedora-sporting Julien, Nora is at first enlivened but eventually falls back into her lackluster doubts and second guesses herself into the same lonely corner. It’s fascinating to watch Posey act. I’ve seen her in about a bazillion movies but never in such a vulnerable, serious role. She plays Nora as someone who realizes how stereotypical it is to be so self-involved but unable to control it … and she does it brilliantly.

Broken English avoids defining itself as just another whinychick flick. There are several moments in the film when Nora’s character could easily become a stereotypical vehicle for confectionary female empowerment. Woman leads sad life, so woman takes irrational risk and consequently, woman finds true love. Happily, Posey shuns this by injecting her character with a deprecating self-awareness that cancels out the cliché. Though Nora acts somewhat rashly later in the film, she doesn’t expect her life to improve or even change. Instead, she seems to be conducting an experiment on herself — a litmus test of what her capabilities are without familiar pressures and distractions. The truly remarkable thing about both the character and the film is that Nora learns nothing she didn’t already know. Her journey doesn’t end in fanfare; in fact, it doesn’t end at all.

Constance Howes is a book critic for Pajiba and a graphic designer living in Philadelphia. She is single, takes Pilates classes, has a blonde best friend and terrible luck in relationships. She sometimes blogs over at I Love You in the Face.


Nothing but the Pajiba | Talk to Me



Comments

what an amazing review. i loved how you not only told the plot, but also showed how to connect it with reality: the female's in general, and your's in particular. very honest, i like it. i'll be sure to read your work in the furute.
and the movie sounds like a must see. i already can relate to it.

Posted by: sol at July 19, 2007 2:48 PM

Great review! Your description really hit home for me, about a friend of mine who also has similar insecurities over being alone and man-less, and insecurities over those insecurities. She's so smart and strong too, it's very frustrating to watch. I think I'll try to catch this movie on DVD.

Posted by: katy at July 19, 2007 2:51 PM

As a single, Pilates class taking woman with terrible luck in relationships I will be taking my blonde best friend with me to see this movie...for moral support.

Posted by: Andrea at July 19, 2007 2:51 PM

Wow! This sounds good. I heard about it a little bit ago, and was waiting to hear about it. Can't wait to see it now, because there seems to be precious few films that deal with relationships (etc.) realistically and well.

Thanks and have fun reviewing here!

Posted by: alec! at July 19, 2007 2:57 PM

I have a friend who wants so badly to be in a relationship that he's been in a few ones lately that just don't work for him, and I mean from the get-go it's obvious. It doesn't look fun, but this movie might make it interesting.

Thanks for the great review.

Posted by: Kevin Longrie at July 19, 2007 2:57 PM

I don't want to have 10,000 of (or even 1 of) Parker Posey's babies, but I would like for her to Pajiba the Pajiba out of me 10,000 times. Then we'll go from there.

Nice review, CH, I thought you were books-only.

Posted by: socalledonlycousins at July 19, 2007 3:07 PM

Nice one. Kudos for the bravery of the personal angle. I tend to believe that all articulate, clever bloggers with Austenesque names like Constance have perfect lives, so now the envy can be reduced a little. Just one comment, I don't think the fact that Parker Posey is gorgeous makes it a stretch to think of her in recidivist single-dom. My best friend for the past 30 years (yes, 30 we were 11 when we met) is stunning, really stunning with a great brain and great body and she spent years never getting past the second date with any guy, I suspect because of the same issues covered in this film. So it can happen.
Footnote: she is now happily married.

Posted by: PaddyDog at July 19, 2007 3:22 PM

What a fantastic review! I enjoyed every bit of it. Keep them coming.

Posted by: Gaby at July 19, 2007 3:33 PM

I've been curious to see Zoe's first full-length. I'm glad to hear it has promise, and I think after reading your review, I'll bump it up towards the top of my must-see list.

Posted by: Jen at July 19, 2007 3:40 PM

oddly i agree with most of the review yet i really didn't like the movie.

Posted by: bob at July 19, 2007 3:59 PM

Are the names Nick and Nora a reference to the "Thin Man" movies, or just a coincidence? Whatever. Sounds like a I would actually want to see. Great review.

Posted by: rlr260 at July 19, 2007 4:07 PM

Having been most familiar with Parker from Best In Show as the neurotic female owner of the neurotic weimaraner, having lovely thoughts about her never occurred to me.

BUT- I wholly and totally see the point of the movie and the reviewer's grasp of the film. And while the emphasis is on women's choices and the bizarre way which exceptionally competent women defeat themselves because of their own insecurity pushed on them from outside, I think it resonates well with me as a man as well. In the same sexual metphor, if only I had listened to the alarm bells in my head and vested more of my self-worth in myself than whom I was fucking . . or that I was seeing anyone at all . . Well, some of my most memorable disasters would have been snuffed out.

Posted by: idiosynchronic at July 19, 2007 4:16 PM

Meeh, I'm tired of movies (and TV for that matter) portraying successful career women as whiny, relationship-challenged and thus ultimately insecure individuals. Bah.

Posted by: Alarmjaguar at July 19, 2007 4:39 PM

Actually, "Pocket Full of Posey" is a good euphemism for what I experience when I watch her beat the effing tar out of Ryan Reynolds in "Blade: Trinity." What that movie really lacked was a Parker Posey-Jessica Biel romantic angle.

Posted by: socalledonlycousins at July 19, 2007 4:41 PM

i feel torn at the thought of either liking or hating this movie. the appeal of parker posey is quite obvious to me, and i was impressed by her ability to bring "nora" to life. it's a good vehicle to bring attention to an actress whom many consider to be highly under-rated/appreciated.


i'm sure there are several of nora's insecurities that the majority of people will be able to identify with. i get what cassavetes was going for, i really do. unfortunately, i just felt as if i was watching a lifetime movie disguised as a "genuine" and "real" independent film. perhaps i'm a cynic, but i spent a good deal of my time rolling my eyes. do people really cry that much? at every tiny little thing that goes wrong? in front of people?


*spoiler*
in addition i felt that this film was tearing me in different directions. there wasn't enough buildup in the secondary characters for me to have any kind of emotional attachment to them, so when audrey finally broke down and let us see that she wasn't so tough after all...it didn't affect me in the way that it was possibly meant to.
just my 2 cents :)

Posted by: jessie-marie at July 19, 2007 4:41 PM

Jessie-Marie: re: "do people really cry that much? at every tiny little thing that goes wrong? in front of people?" Meet my youngest sister, a wife and mother who holds down a responsible job as a nurse-mid-wife in a teaching hospital whom you have just described to a T. Yeah, I don't get it either, but it certainly does happen.

Posted by: PaddyDog at July 19, 2007 5:07 PM

Wow, great review. I had no interest in seeing this movie until I read your take on it!

Posted by: Jen at July 19, 2007 11:45 PM

Jessie-Marie & PaddyDog:

I'm embarassed to admit it, but thats me. I think some people (me, anyways) spend so long controlling their emotions, that they get to the point where they are completely unable to do it anymore - they break down into uncontrollable tears over the smallest things, regardless of whether they are around other people or not. It sucks, but it happens to some.

Posted by: CryBaby at July 19, 2007 11:46 PM

Very, very good review. Very well done. You made me want to see this film.

Have to comment on the crying thing. Bit weird this: I probably hadn't cried, and I'm talking at all, ever, for about four years. Break ups, sad movies, little girls and little girls' puppies dying in each other's arms. Nope, nothing made me cry. I was dry. And stupidly, kind of proud of it. Until that is, I met the guy I later married and every emotion I'd been controlling with a will of iron become uncontrollable once Love got involved. An unexpected phone call from my sweetie. Happy cry. Some mildly bad news. Mildly bad news cry. The recent TLC Fathers' Day montage promos. Weird (since I'm not a father am in fact female) cry.

Posted by: Rebecca H. at July 20, 2007 2:51 AM

Is the film actually any good visually, linguistically, and structurally, as well as in emotional resonance? Is it funny, at all? Or just wry and bleak? Would non-thirty-something singles like it?

Posted by: Dillony at July 20, 2007 3:33 AM

Amazing review, Constance. It's a real pleasure reading your thoughts on books, movies, anything... :)

Posted by: beth at July 20, 2007 8:31 AM

Constance, first thank you for going by Constance and not Connie. Work it girl.
PP is a great actress. I enjoy her work. Daytrippers anyone??

Posted by: way2manykids at July 20, 2007 11:44 AM

way2manykids, "Daytrippers" was the film that kind of opened my eyes that there was a world of films out there that weren't Hollywood crap. In addition to Parker Posey, there were Liev Schreiber, Campbell Scott, Anne Meara, Stanley Tucci -- what a cast! I sort of knew there was an indy film scene back then, but that was the turning point where I got into it.

Posted by: socalledonlycousins at July 20, 2007 12:52 PM

man, I pretty much want to see this movie for Justin Theroux. Yeah, okay, I like Parker Posey, I think. I say 'I think' because, to be honest, I have no idea what I've seen her in besides Superman Returns and, according to this thread, Best In Show. But I can't even recall an accurate, non-fuzzy picture of her face to mind. Which is a shame, because with all of your praise (a group I do hold in high-esteem, Pajiba-readers), I wish I could say more accurately what I feel about her.

But Justin Theroux is someone I never see enough of, so if I see this, he'll be why.

Posted by: Hannah at July 20, 2007 10:37 PM

Hannah, check out "Party Girl" and "House of Yes" for two essential Parker Posey performances.

Posted by: socalledonlycousins at July 21, 2007 11:31 AM

I saw the movie yesterday - and expected to like it - not LOVE LOVE LOVE! it. I'm 62, been married 35 years w/2 kids, but I
related to her character somehow. Or just sympathized with her. She was so believable and vulnerable. It unfolded so
effortlessley and naturally. Parker was wonderful. So was the whole cast. Gena must be very proud. As well as Zoe's pop watching from somewhere. Can't wait to see it again -with my
20 year old daughter.

Posted by: Maureen Melvin at July 21, 2007 1:28 PM

I've also had the excruciatingly cathartic experience of watching my life's wounds played out on screen, but fortunately it was at home watching a rental. My best friend & I built a fort around me out of all the couch cushions - it was the only way I could hang in to watch the ending.
I like your style, Constance, and will look forward to more reviews. This one was pretty brief though. I was curious about Zoe's directing style (I used to love her on that old short-lived show she had with Sofia Coppola, "Hi Octane").

Posted by: mfg at July 21, 2007 4:37 PM

socalledonlycousins: thank you for the suggestions, both movies are now in my Netflix queue.

Posted by: Hannah at July 22, 2007 10:16 PM

Wow, fantastic review. I know I have to see this movie but I suspect I'll find it hideously uncomfortable for all the "watching your own issues playing out on the screen" reasons mentioned above. Thank you for the beautiful description- there are a few female friends I'll be dragging along to see this with me I feel.

Posted by: Alex the Odd at July 23, 2007 5:53 AM

Fabulous movie. I saw it this weekend and loved it. Like, loved it enough to want to stay in my seat and watch it immediately again. I was not familiar with Parker Posey, but I think I might love her now. I laughed, I cried and my husband was entertained as well.

Posted by: cam at July 30, 2007 2:31 PM

Great review, Constance. Love your name :)

While I've always really enjoyed PP in any of Guest's movies, I never saw her as someone very relatable.

Your review makes me want to see the movie. I may need to barricade myself on the couch with pillows, though, so I'll have to save it for a hormonal day, to take full advantage of the ensuing weeping.

Also, the girl who never cried 'til she was married? I'm so with you. No tears were shed when I broke my finger going ass over teakettle in a rocky stream bed, or dislocating my knee not once but twice, or for that matter, finding out about my parent's decision to separate on the eve of my graduation.... and yet, odd moments with Hubby will have me blubbering into his manly (yet oh so comforting) shoulders.

Posted by: Stella at August 16, 2007 9:38 PM