free counter with statistics Blades of Glory | Pajiba - Scathing Reviews for Bitchy People

bladlesofglory.jpg

It’s All the Same / Only the Names Will Chaaaange

Blades of Glory / Dustin Rowles

Film Reviews | April 1, 2007 | Comments (72)


Well, I suppose the best word to describe Blades of Glory is idiotic. Lookit: It’s as though Will Ferrell (who can actually actI’ve seen it) told a somewhat hilarious joke several years ago, and — emboldened by the laughter he elicited — decided to tell the joke again. Only louder. And instead of finding a new joke, he just kept telling the same one, changing the characters and the situations around slightly and increasing the volume of his voice with each repetition. And, at a certain point, hearing the same joke gets beyond annoying — it starts to make your ears bleed. And it’s not like Jon Heder offers any reprieve. He’s the guy who never managed to tell an amusing joke, but everyone felt so sorry for him that they laughed anyway. And now the guy has extracted every last goddamn ounce out of that pity laugh, and somewhere along the line, that sympathy we once felt has turned to spite. Honestly, I just want to shake the motherfucking doofus out of him and stick his nose in it like a goddamn dog that has shat on the carpet.

Now that I think of it, I’ve actually seen dog shit with more character than Blades of Glory (granted, it was shaped like the Virgin Mary). Indeed, this movie is only intermittently funny if you’ve never seen a comedy, Will Ferrell, or “American’s Funniest Home” videos before. In other words, Encino Man would’ve chuckled a bit, but only if Pauly Shore sat on him until he did. Actually, strike that — Blades of Glory does occasionally work, but only while Ferrell is on the ice, stroking his nipples, smelling Heder’s junk, and doing that blustery bravado thing he does, to the sound of Queen’s “Flash,” Aerosmith’s “I Don’t Want To Miss A Thing,” or Billy Squire’s “Stroke.” But, the classic rock goes a long way toward making it palatable. At best, the humor is fleeting, and the cartoonish absurdity of it all (jet-propelled ice skates?) has a way of completely pulling you out of the moment. What does it say, after all, when the most intriguing part of a movie is trying to identify the faces of the stunt doubles?

The problem starts with the premise — pairing two men in a doubles figure skating competition in an effort to parody a sport that’s already one huge self-parody. You know why George Bush impressionists aren’t that popular? Because it’s impossible to create a caricature of a self-caricature — how much dumber would you have to act to hit home the point that our president is a grade-A moron without drooling on your collar and wallowing in your own feces? And where’s the humor in calling figure skating a gay sport when there’s no popular opinion to confront that assumption? Who the hell is going to be offended or shocked? The legions of burly straight men with beer guts and handlebar moustaches who fill arenas to see guys in spandex and codpieces twirl around to Celine Dion numbers? If there’s anything to mine here it might be the underlying heteroeroticism in the sport — I can see taking two guys in one-pieces and mocking their secret obsessions with NASCAR and subscriptions to Titties & Ammo. I mean, at least it’s something.

Whatever: Blades of Glory concerns two figure skaters with opposing personalities. Jimmy MacElroy (Heder) was pulled out of an orphanage and molded by his billionaire adoptive father and a few space-age contraptions into the prototypical figure skater — he’s an effete, wispy doofus who plays with goddamn peacocks. Then there is Chazz Michael Michaels (Ferrell), who was raised on the streets of Detroit and learned to skate in Motown’s sewer system. He’s pretty much Frank the Tank, John Waite, and Steve Perry rolled into one: A bombastic blowhard who shoots fire out of his hands, makes sweet love to the ladies, and drinks until he pukes. Oh, and he shows his belly a lot. For the lady folk.

Right off the bat, the two tie for the gold medal at the Olympics, which leads to a fracas on the ice. The mascot gets torched, and MacElroy and Michaels are banned from figure skating competition for life. Or at least until the next Olympics roll around, when they decide to give up their menial jobs and exploit a loophole that allows them to team up in the doubles competition: Boy and Boy, Fire and Ice, Classic Rock and Classical, The Guy with the Package and the Guy who has to Smell It. Ho hmph.

So, enter they do, with Craig T. Nelson serving as their coach, which mostly means that he calls the two skaters “ladies,” and asks them to stop their incessant whining. Their main rival in the doubles competition are the Van Waldenberg siblings (Will Arnett and Amy Poehler, both wasted talent in these roles), the evil duo with the inevitable incestuous vibe, whose little wallflower sister, Katie (the severely miscast Jenna Fischer) falls for MacElroy over snow cones and an awkward French kiss. Dumb, lifeless, unimaginative, insipid hijinks ensue, mostly involving running the one joke (figure skaters are gay!) into the ground and playing up Michaels’ sex addiction, which the Van Waldenbergs’ exploit to drive a wedge between MacElroy and Michaels.

There are some decent lines (mostly in the first 10 minutes), and Ferrell’s hostile bravado works with diminishing returns (he’d be a decent supporting character in a movie like, say, Better off Dead), but Blades of Glory is mostly the sort of lazy, facile comedy you’d expect from a team of monkeys with a typewriter (here played by Jeff and Craig Cox, John Altschuler, and Dave Krinsky, from Busy Phillips’ story idea) and an unhealthy obsession with the smell of their own genitalia. And, of course, there is also the expected trick stunt — the Iron Lotus — to rouse the finale, so to speak. Unfortunately, it isn’t half as imaginative as Thornton Melon’s Triple Lindy in Back to School except that here, at least, there is the threat of decapitation.

Sadly, it remains only a threat. Sadder still, there’s no Def Leppard.

Dustin Rowles is the publisher of Pajiba. He lives with his wife in Ithaca, New York. You may email him, or leave a comment below.


The Defining Movie of this Generation | Pajiba Love 04/02/07



Comments

I'm still going to see this one.....help me.

Posted by: Manny at March 30, 2007 5:12 PM

So I take it I've seen all I need to see in the previews and that's about it? I had a feeling it would be that way.

Posted by: wandereraz at March 30, 2007 5:13 PM

I can't believe I've gone from the sublime (swapping top 5 CDs with Pajibans) to the absolute ridiculous (reading about a Will Ferrell movie) in the course of one afternoon. Oh well, I'm going to see The Namesake tonight. Hopefully, it will live up to Mira Nair's usual excellence and wipe any image of Will Ferrell out of my mind.

Posted by: PaddyDog at March 30, 2007 5:14 PM

"...who shat has on the carpet."

Is that weird or is that just me?

Typo corrected. -Ed.

Anyway, I totally agree about the whole "and instead of finding a new joke, he just kept on telling the same one, changing the characters and the situations around slightly and increasing the volume of his voice with each repetition" thing. I'll (sadly) admit that I was half-interested in watching this movie, but now... Well, thanks for saving my $8.50, Dustin.

Posted by: becky at March 30, 2007 5:14 PM

They used The Stroke in a Will Ferrell movie??? I wanna cry.

Posted by: pinkcheese at March 30, 2007 5:20 PM

I was hoping against hope that this movie would be funny, but this is more or less what I expected to hear. My thought on seeing the previews was that this movie is trying to be Zoolander... and although I'll buy Will Ferrell as Ben Stiller, Napolean Dynamite is no Owen Wilson.

Posted by: roses at March 30, 2007 5:23 PM

At this point,... I just want to shake the motherfucking doofus out of him and stick his nose in it like a goddamn dog who has shat on the carpet.

I admire your patience. Personally, I reached that point about twenty minutes into Napoleon Dynamite.

I was going to see this one in the hopes that Will Arnett and Amy Poehler might make it watchable, but it sounds like that didn't happen. Thanks for taking yet another one for the team, Dustin.

Posted by: Mr. Atoz at March 30, 2007 5:25 PM

For some reason I find all of the Ferrel flicks terrible on first viewing, I mean I physically can't stand to be in broadcast range....and then in the throes of absolute boredom, usually hung-over and unwilling to get off the couch, I will chance upon one and re-watch, and here's the thing: in some sort of what has to be 'tard alchemy they become funny, hilarious & eminently quotable...how the fuck does that work????

Gotta be the weed.

Posted by: Idon'tcarehe'llalwaysbeBurgundytoME at March 30, 2007 5:26 PM

"comedy you'd expect from a team of monkeys with a typewriter" Do these monkeys have any previous writing credits?

And like Manny, I'll still see it. Even though I know it's terrible and stupid. But I can wait until it's $1.50.

Posted by: anikitty at March 30, 2007 5:43 PM

I saw it this afternoon. It wasn't exceptional, but I don't think it was nearly as bad as this review indicates. It was ALOT like zoolander, and it didn't seem to find the right kind of humor. At first it seemed like it was going to be super nutty like Anchorman or Talledega Nights, but it just sorat jumped in between different types of humor, and didn't work too well. I laughed a decent amount, but I felt that there was alot more they could do to make things funnier.

Posted by: es4 at March 30, 2007 6:03 PM

Story idea by Busy Phillips?

You mean the girl from Freaks and Geeks came up with this?

That is quite random, unless Judd Apatow produced, which would then make sense.

Posted by: Chris W. at March 30, 2007 6:08 PM

Is there really a magazine called "Titties and Ammo"?

I actually think I'd at least mildly enjoy this movie just because my expectations for it are really low. I think that was my problem with Talladega Nights, I went in expecting really funny when I should have expected way less.

Posted by: Scott at March 30, 2007 6:32 PM

And instead of finding a new joke, he just kept on telling the same one, changing the characters and the situations around slightly and increasing the volume of his voice with each repetition. At a certain point, it gets beyond annoying

So you're saying he's become nothing more than a one trick pony in different costumes?

Posted by: missmle at March 30, 2007 6:41 PM

For the love of God people!!! Stop going to these movies!It only encourages them to churn out more at what can only be called an obscene waste of money, time and film.I long for the day when Will Ferrel's free ticket to Hollywood c/o SNL is completely punched out.

Posted by: brite at March 30, 2007 6:49 PM

Bah. I've seen precisely one Will Ferrel movie all the way through - Stranger than Fiction. It was beautiful, it was brilliant, and I have no desire to spoil my impression of the man with something that sounds as if it would make Anchorman sound fun (I made it through fifteen minutes of that one and gave up to clip my toenails). I'm no snob when it comes to movies - I get a certain unholy glee out of watching Xanadu, for god's sake, and I freely admit to having enjoyed Goldmember when I saw that. But please, really, I agree with brite. Stop going to see these? What kind of disconnect does it take to say, "Gosh, that's gonna suck - hu-yep, I guess I'm gonna have to see it"??? Saying shit like that is just admitting to being a mindless fucking sheep who can't stand to be left out of the pop culture loop even at the expense of having standards, and it's precisely what the fuck's wrong with out culture. Everyone's so afraid to stand out from the crowd that they'll accept any shit shoved down their throats - in entertainment AND politics. Goddamn it, have the fucking courage of your convictions and the balls to say, "No, thanks, that looks like a steaming pile, and anyone who would accept your offering must be aesthetically and/or morally defective."

Posted by: Landon at March 30, 2007 7:07 PM

The legions of burly straight men with beer guts and handlebar moustaches who fill arenas to see guys in spandex and codpieces twirl around to Celine Dion numbers?

The reason this line bothers me is the same reason this movie is not funny: you got your stereotypes wrong. You don't know where exactly the "gayness" and excesses of figure skating lie, so you can't build any real humour upon it.

Posted by: MJ at March 30, 2007 7:13 PM

MJ, you can't suggest that we're missing out on "where exactly the "gayness" and excesses of figure skating lie" and then not tell us. Pretty please, do share!

Posted by: buttercup at March 30, 2007 7:52 PM

Well, I saw it today and laughed all the way thru it. I am the lowest common demonitator.

Will Farrell makes me laugh and I am not ashamed to say it. I will shout it from the roof tops if I have to. I like silliness and I love the brand he's sellin'. You can ban me for life from your posts or whatever. I can take the heat.

And I think the Amy P. and Will A. sexual chemistry made them all the more creepy. The effect I'm guessin' they were going for.

Posted by: wsapnin at March 30, 2007 8:54 PM

wsapnin - Hey man, I respect your honesty. I think Will Ferrel's movie suck dog nuts, but then again, I don't say I'm gonna see 'em anyway. THAT'S what chaps my ass - people who want it both ways. I don't mind people disagreeing with me about what's good and what's not; I just can't stand people who are so whipped by the pressure of conformity that they'll shell out to see what everyone else is lining up to see, even if they think it's gonna, well, suck dog nuts.

Go for it, man. Go see your Will Ferrel movies. I may never go see a movie with you, but at least you know who the fuck you are.

Posted by: Landon at March 30, 2007 10:52 PM

After disliking Ferrell's comedy for years, I really wanted to give Ferrell the benefit of the doubt after seeing Stranger Than Fiction. That movie really gets to me, and I watch it about once a month. I would really like Ferrell to make better choices and start respecting his audience.

Posted by: Pyleia at March 30, 2007 11:07 PM

I saw this tonight and laughed the entire time, as did the whole theatre. I actually cried a few times.

I don't know if I should be ashamed of this or not. :) I loved it. It was good silly fun.

Posted by: Dana at March 30, 2007 11:13 PM

"Better OFF Dead"
Somehow, no matter how insipid and foolish, I can't get sick of Will Ferrel. I think he earned a bottomless supply of goodwill with "Stranger Than Fiction".

Posted by: Maria at March 30, 2007 11:30 PM

Even though I have gotten sick of the frat boys fawning over Mr. Ferrell's movies, and even though I know this is just like every other comedy that he's done...I'm still going to see it. I wasn't sure why, but upon careful self-analysis I have concluded that I am actually going because I am in love with Will Arnett.

Oh well.

Posted by: Rosie at March 31, 2007 12:11 AM

Thank you, thank you, thank you for the correctly used past-participle of "to shit." Would you like oral gratification now? You deserve it. I am NOT being sarcastic.

Posted by: Megan at March 31, 2007 12:11 AM

Am I the only one amused by the ad for figure skate wear on the sidebar for this review?

Posted by: Anne (in Reno) at March 31, 2007 1:28 AM

thanks for saying our pres is a grade A moron and saying that he is akin to drooling and wallowing in shit, maybe you should go kiss rosie odonell on the "lips". that was just rude, this is a movie review site, a blog, perhaps people should stick to what they do best, review films/tv, and write witty comentary. I read this blog for an escape and for quality reviews, don't face punch me with politics, this is an escape from all the politicos, go work for The New York Times if that's what you're about.

Posted by: ab at March 31, 2007 1:36 AM

"I read this blog for an escape and for quality reviews, don't face punch me with politics, this is an escape from all the politicos, go work for The New York Times if that's what you're about."

So... Calling Bush a dope passes for political wonkdom with you?

Gerald Ford was a klutz. Where's my cushy New York Times gig?!

Posted by: Ben at March 31, 2007 2:07 AM

i just saw it....laughed and laughed!

i was one of those people who watched 'anchorman' and on first viewing thought it sucked, and didn't go to see 'talladega nights' for the same reason....but i've come to the conclusion: the more times you watch his movies, the funnier they get...and now after watching them a few times, i get the "vibe" they're swimming in, so i went to this movie with that "thought" and had a super-duper great time--which was all i wanted for my ten bucks...

i too saw 'stranger than fiction' and loved him in it; having seen that movie, just made me appreciate him even more. because no matter how goofy or lame the gag might have been in this film--he sold it!

Posted by: maxpurr9 at March 31, 2007 2:09 AM

keep in mind: it's still a stupid movie.

Posted by: maxpurr9 at March 31, 2007 2:11 AM

As a preface, I admit that I'm a film snob, and as proof, I'd pony up the fact that I'm a regular reader of Pajiba, and more often than not, agree with the reviews and the general tenor of this site and it's critics.

Having said that, I'll now say that I saw this film tonight with several friends, all of whom can likewise be characterized as film snobs, and we all laughed our asses off throughout. The fact that we expected nothing more or less than a Will Ferrell vehicle allowed us to enjoy this film for what it is...

It's juvenile, oftentimes just plain absurd, and the plot, of course, is really nothing more than a basic frame to support the juvenalia, and that's pretty much what we expected. We just felt like having a few cheap laughs tonight, and on that score, it delivered. The almost sell-out crowd's laughter seemed a fair indication that they enjoyed it as well, and whatever differences in intelligence, education and common denominators can simply be damned.

I like Will Ferrell, and while I agree with Dustin that at this point Ferrell is mostly a one trick pony, I think what sets him apart from, say, Ben Stiller, or any of his comedic contemporaries, is the fact that Ferrell is so damn serious about this one "trick", and he does his particular schtick with absolute conviction. I can appreciate that. It seems obvious to me that he truly believes in the humor he's peddling, and he puts everything he's got into it, no matter how stupid it may, or may not, be.

The characters played by Arnett and Poehler were the biggest disappointments to me. I don't know if I can pin it on the actors themselves, who seemed to be phoning it in (and isn't the beloved Arnett a bit of a one dimensional performer himself?), or just indifference from the writers, who seemed to give these two so little to work with, but I found these characters to be rather bloodless, and dull foils for Ferrell and Heder. In contrast, Cohen's gay French racer in Talladega Nights truly gave Ferrell someone to play against.

I realize I'm rambling here, but the bottom line, for me, is that not all films have to be Kurosawa's RAN, you know? And more to the point, not all comedic films have to be Harold & Maude, or Monty Python, or a Coen brothers joint. Sometimes, I just want to laugh a bit, and for that, I'd take a Will Ferrell film over something like Wild Hogs or the Wayans oeuvre every single time.

It's all relative, and it's all about properly adjusting one's expectations. A few cheap laughs with some friends on a Friday night is sometimes enough.

Posted by: Mohaski at March 31, 2007 2:54 AM

I think Anchorman is the Citizen Kane of stupid movies. That would make Zoolander the Casablanca of stupid movies. Together they are the creme de la creme of stupid cinema. I love them.

Posted by: dood at March 31, 2007 3:41 AM

I'll take the bait...if my seeing this movie were about conformity and being a "mindless fucking sheep" then I would probably not mention on this site or in this particular review which panned the movie that I planned to see it. I would just say Dustin you're the smartest, funniest, whatever-ist movie reviewer and I will do whatever you say.

I think that Will Ferrell is funny--even while I can admit that he has one joke in different costumes. Though I am not especially proud, I too am something of a movie snob. Zoolander was the first stupid comedy to crack my pretensions--so Will Ferrell gets my movie money from time to time. I didn't think that Anchorman was particularly funny so I saw Talladega Nights with quite a few reservations, ready to abandon his ilk but I was won over once again. Stranger than Fiction was excellent--and it wasn't the mindless drones seeing it that made me believe it because more people saw Wild Hogs. So thanks for your input, and have a wonderful weekend.

Dustin--please find ways to insult the POTUS in every review that you do.

Posted by: anikitty at March 31, 2007 11:16 AM

Dana--next time you're in Nashville, you and me should hang.

Posted by: wsapnin at March 31, 2007 12:45 PM

Aye, buttercup, for my way with words is fickle, and I decided to post that at 1 a.m.

Anyway, I'll try to explain it the best way I can. The homoeroticism in figure skating doesn't lie either in the fans and professional frame that surround it, nor in the interactions between the skaters on the ice. There's not a well defined gay demographic that follows figure-skating, like Dustin seems to suggest. Unlike with theater, ballet or interior design, there's no widely accepted popular knowledge linking rampant homosexuality with the profession.

Besides, on the ice, the male skater often serves as a strong, "manly" counterpoint to the female: he lifts her up on the air, throws her around, catches her, and is often found in a dominant position. Also, in the choreographies that build a history to go along with the music, said story very often involves a heterosexual love story between the skaters.

What I'm trying to say is that, contrary to what Dustin suggests, it is not homoeroticism so much as campyness and over-the-top sensitivity that you can draw upon to make fun of figure skating. Pairing off two male skaters seems so fake that the homoerotic shenanigans that ensue are not very funny (because they're past the point where the link to reality is patent), but having a skater throw a diva fit about his sparkly outfit, or be obsessed about building up his thighs's muscles works much better.

IMHO YMMV ISUN.

Posted by: MJ at March 31, 2007 1:30 PM

I figure skated competitively for 9 years, and I wouldn't say it was a parody of itself. It's extremely grueling and requires a lot of skill. The thrill of skating over the ice, jumping and landing can't really be compared to.

I agree with your comment, though, MJ that it would have been better to parody the actual sport rather than the pairing of two idiots. It is rife with potential, as I can duly attest, from wearing stupid dresses to all the petty in-fighting that goes on. But that's the same for any sport like figure skating.

Posted by: Rachael at March 31, 2007 6:50 PM

hello hello , isn`t the picture up top ferrel and heder slow dancing or slow skating ... seems some what gay to some people i`m sure .the straight guy in the gay sport of figure skating is taylor made for will ferrel, even ben stiller could of killed in this arena.. ps go florida !!!!

Posted by: pasadenamike at March 31, 2007 7:21 PM

To all you people out there who think this movie was stupid....Your right! Thats the point! This is not a piece of cinematic history in the making, nor does it claim to be.
Its a WILL FARRELL movie!! He's a FIGURE SKATER! Go see this movie with this in mind and just try to enjoy it. I sat with 300 other people who all thoroughly enjoyed themselves. Try it, you might just like it

Posted by: PNutty at March 31, 2007 8:08 PM

Great. Pasadenamike's been at the cough syrup again.

Posted by: Craig at March 31, 2007 9:33 PM

Rachael..hellooo.... obviously you squandered your youth figure skating and not in English class. Please don't end your phrases in a preposition. Don't you know these people reading this blog are into "films" not "movies"?

Posted by: bdrake at April 1, 2007 12:02 AM

i like when dustin reviews a comedy and his article is funnier than the movie.

perhaps you should extend this to other genres; e.g. make us cry more, cower more...

Posted by: celery at April 1, 2007 7:42 AM

Uh, Amy Poehler "wasted talent"? You have to have some to waste first. She is the unfunniest yet most seen (in bits and movie roles) female SNL alum ever. Even in a simplistic bitch role she sucked balls.

The rest of the movie is pretty much what you said, however, when I heard the opening ominous bars of "Flash" I could have stood up and cheered- long time Queen fan, and that's about their most unknown and unappreciated album. That song is fantastic, and The Hero is cool too :) May's guitar fills in "Flash" send shivers up my back, still.

And fuck Def Leppard, all they ever were was a big fat snare sound with some insipid music wrapped around. And also "Don't Wanna Miss" is Aerosmith's worst song ever, no doubt because of who wrote it, the name of which I will not speak. Drivel. Any of their original power ballads would have been much better (Home Tonight, You See Me Crying, hell Dream On is basically a powerballad, just so original and unique it doesn't seem one, and none of their original stuff is so off the shelf as Journey and Boston's crap.

If they would have used Seasons of Wither I WOULD have stood up and cheered :)

Posted by: darcy_lane at April 1, 2007 5:05 PM

When I quickly glimpsed at the photo for this review, I thought it was Laverne and Shirley.

Posted by: Kathy at April 1, 2007 11:46 PM

Here's the thing: there are only two Will Ferrell movies anyone should EVER see--Stranger than Fiction and Elf. That's IT.

(Trust me on Elf. Seriously.)

It's odd what I laugh out loud at: "who plays with goddamn peacocks." That killed me.

As for your reference to bush, I want to echo what someone else said: please work more insults about him into every single fucking review. That asshole deserves to be insulted, at the very least, every chance anyone gets.

Unless I stumble onto a free rental and there's nothing else to rent, I won't be seeing this. I will cop to loving Napoleon Dynamite, but I think Heder is probably in that crop of actors who can do one part well and that's it. IOW, Heder hit his peak right out of the starting gate and it's all downhill from there.

Posted by: Kathy at April 1, 2007 11:57 PM

I have never wanted anyone in my life as much as I want you, right here, right now. Take me in well and let me bathe in your extraordinary verbal prowess.

Oh, and I loved the review, too.

Posted by: Justine at April 2, 2007 1:38 AM

does anyone know how it works in the movie industry? like if he would have signed this contract waaaay before something like stranger than fiction and then had to do it even though he's pursuing other (better) projects like that? just curious. he has so much potential, but ... damn.

Posted by: eliza at April 2, 2007 4:48 AM

i love me some Def Leppard!

Posted by: natalie at April 2, 2007 8:37 AM

Kathy, I do indeed agree with you on Elf... however in your (appropriately) short list of Will Ferrel movies anyone should EVER see you missed out "A Night at the Roxbury". I'd like to petition for its addition to the list.

Posted by: Alex the Odd at April 2, 2007 10:17 AM

I went and saw this with a friend on Friday. I thought it was hilarious. But I'd also been drinking cough syrup all day...

Posted by: Nadha at April 2, 2007 12:49 PM

sorry it's stupid and.... i liked it!!

Posted by: olsen at April 2, 2007 3:15 PM

The movie was hilarious! It may be the same joke, but its the same joke that keeps on working.

Posted by: kristin at April 2, 2007 4:32 PM

Right off the bat, the two tie for the gold medal at the Olympics, which leads to a fracas on the ice.

It was actually the World Figure Skating Championships :)

Posted by: Kaonashi at April 2, 2007 8:41 PM

If you want to see all the jokes that are actually almost funny, I'm sure they're all in the trailer.

Posted by: GracefulDave at April 3, 2007 1:38 AM

"Story idea by Busy Phillips? You mean the girl from Freaks and Geeks came up with this?"

I too found that really odd. And she's now in ER with Linda Cardellini (sp?).

"You know why George Bush impressionists aren't that popular? Because it's impossible to create a caricature of a self-caricature -- how much dumber would you have to act to hit home the point that our president is a grade-A moron without drooling on your collar and wallowing in your own feces? And where's the humor in calling figure skating a gay sport when there's no popular opinion to confront that assumption?".

This was brilliant. Every single writer for the movie industry should have this written in huge cardboards hanging on their walls.

"I really wanted to give Ferrell the benefit of the doubt after seeing Stranger Than Fiction. That movie really gets to me, and I watch it about once a month."

Yeah, what's with this movie? I saw it about two or three months ago, and I'm still not recovered from it. It's been the best film I've seen this year and I strongly believe that, no matter what I come to see in 2007, it will stand as such.

Posted by: Gargumma at April 3, 2007 5:06 AM

I saw the movie and enjoyed it. It's supposed to be stupid. Will Ferrell just makes me laugh. If you feel the same way, see this movie. If you didn't like Anchorman because you thought it was insensitive towards women, then don't see this movie.

Posted by: francis at April 3, 2007 12:57 PM

@bdrake- lay off rachael, you fool.

"Don't you know these people reading this blog..."

i find something strangely obscene about your sentence structure there, bucko.
rachael was making the same point i was about to make, having been a competitive skater myself. why drag out the grammar police just to make fun of someone who is probably more physically talented than you may ever dream to be? the use of inline skates and intoxicants on a weekend may be a "squandered youth", but the general public has no idea what it really takes to skate competitively.
so, my spelling may be incorrect, my grammar perhaps a bit off, but i'm willing to bet my double jumps beat all hell out of yours, bdrake.
its a REVIEW (that's right, "its" not "it's"), and oh, yes, i CHOOSE not to use the shift key, so don't even start with me.

sorry i got off-topic, i just really found that comment rude.
and rachael... what regional area do you hail from??

Posted by: evilbunny at April 3, 2007 7:49 PM

I suppose what puzzles me most about this review is that Dustin had exactly the same critiques for this film as for Talladega Nights; however, Talladega Nights was lauded as being funny despite these shortcomings while this movie is panned because of them.

Clearly, I can understand if one movie is simply superior to the other, but as this review suggests, the two films are practically one in the same - only with different costumes, names, and different mockeries of homosexuality.

Why, with nothing really presented as evidence to distinguish them from each other, should one be awarded a sparkling review and the other be slapped with the proverbial Pajiba stamp of dismissal?

Posted by: Amanda at April 3, 2007 8:26 PM

Idon'tcarehe'llalwaysbeBurgundytoME:

TOTALLY agree, I felt the same about Zoolander too, and Anchorman, althought Old School and Stranger Than Fiction was love at first viewing

Posted by: KHA at April 4, 2007 7:33 PM

Screw you man this movie was funny as hell!!!!!!!!
LOVED IT!!!!

Posted by: Mike at April 7, 2007 12:43 AM

P.S. I was reading some of these so i could download the song from it and i didn't know the title but who is actually a big enough loser to base their seeing or not seeing of a movie on a BLOG comment posted by some hack movie critic

Posted by: Mike at April 7, 2007 12:48 AM

I truly hope that Will Arnett is not a one-dimensional performer. In all my research, I have found him to have a lot of talent. Even in the character of GOB on Arrested Development, Will's grasp of the character's subtelties made a smarmy, womanizing amateur magician desirable.

Check out the Will Arnett Research Project at http://blutharnett.blogspot.com

Posted by: Segway at April 7, 2007 1:23 PM

fuck anyone who does not think that this was the funniest film out this year by far

Posted by: govan at April 8, 2007 3:17 PM

Hey Ya'll!

Just a little editor's note: It's perfectly okay to end a sentence with a preposition. That's an old timey rule from grammar skule, and real writers ignore it regularly. It's not something to fight over. Get it?

You can also split an infinitive and start a sentence with a conjunction. But know that you're doing it, and do it sparingly.

Just an update on the constantly evolving and often maddening English language.

Posted by: Karla at April 9, 2007 3:18 AM

Oh.
My.
God.
Kathy (at April 1, 2007 11:57 PM) and I must have been separated at birth cuz she said everything I was going to say!

Posted by: Fabiola Thing at April 9, 2007 3:29 PM

I had been dying to see this movie since I first saw a commercial for it, and while I was a little disappointed, I still had a good time and enjoyed it. I have to agree with previous posts that Will Ferrell's better movies are Zoolander, Elf (now required holiday viewing in my home), and Stranger Than Fiction. Despite this, I still LOVE Anchorman and Talladega Nights. I can watch them over and over and never get tired of them. They're not great "films"; the storylines barely exist and the premises are lame. What makes those movies so awesome are the jokes. They just keep coming, and Ferrell and his costars have amazing timing and chemistry. Poor Will had to carry Blades of Glory all by himself; Jon Heder is NOT funny, period, and Wil Arnett and Amy Poehler didn't get enough good lines. It's not fair to expect one actor to hold up a movie with a lame plot and inferior jokes. Give the man a break!

Posted by: Shannon at April 9, 2007 4:17 PM

I confess- I laughed my ass off. Sometimes a movie is like a Rorshach test- you get from it what you go in expecting. I wanted to laugh, so I got laughs from jokes I never would've found funny if I had seen it in a different mood. That's the difference between the general public and film critics- we, the public, get to decide what movie we want to see at the theater and when we want to go. Critics have movies that are out when they're out, and they need to be reviewed, whether your dog just died, your car got towed, or whatever. It works the other way around, too, of course- If I am feeling lighthearted and silly, I wouldn't go see Schindler's List, just like a misanthropic, maudlin mood doesn't bode well for The Holiday, or whatever.
Bottom line- I respect the review- I can't honestly disagree with a lot of it- but I still enjoyed the pants off that movie. "Throw me some chicken."

Posted by: go big red at April 11, 2007 3:53 PM

"Uh, Amy Poehler "wasted talent"? You have to have some to waste first. She is the unfunniest yet most seen (in bits and movie roles) female SNL alum ever. Even in a simplistic bitch role she sucked balls."
Posted by: darcy_lane at April 1, 2007 5:05 PM

Pardon me! Upright Citizen's Brigade! She was hilarious in that!
...Damn, will they hurry up and release season two on dvd.

Posted by: Loob at April 11, 2007 8:35 PM

This review is a whole lot of bullshit!...the movie was fkn awesome! recomended for all to see (if you haven't yet) jon and will are hilarious in this movie!
I liked it soo much!--I would totally watch it again, hands down!
...and to who wrote this particular review...f**k you! because you don't know what the fk you're talking about!
This is a movie that everyone would love to watch!!!
and for the record...jon heder IS HILARIOUS in every movie he does!!!!! same goes for Will...although I didn't really like stranger then fiction..found it quite boring actually..but besides that, everything else he's acted in is good...
So..don't listen to that review...he doesn't know what he's fkng talking about!!!!

>>watch 'Blades of Glory' ..you truely wont regret it!!!!!

Posted by: Angel at April 16, 2007 8:17 AM

I see that the high-schoolers have found their way to this page.

Posted by: Sarah at April 16, 2007 8:46 PM

With all due respect to the high-schoolers on here who are actually intelligent.

I saw Blades Of Glory on Thursday. I won't lie; I was high as a kite that evening. However, it did have its funny parts. If you know what to expect going into it (a stupid funny movie), then there will be no disillusionment.

Posted by: Sarah at April 16, 2007 8:47 PM

If you dont like stupid movies then dont go see stupid movies! That SIMPLE!! This movie was great just like most of his others! This movie didnt make promises of being an academy award winner... it made promises to be silly and make you laugh... and guess what... it did exactly what it promised!!! So stop bitching and go watch your soaps!!!

Posted by: Joe at April 19, 2007 1:50 PM

Um...I really loved it. I can't explain myself. Like it really, really cracked me up. And I actually felt that Heder in particular worked the role perfectly. And I agree about what you said with Ferrell just getting louder and wearing a different outfit, but if I'm still laughing at it, then whatever, right? And, I dunno...I'd like to think I'm not a blow-hard who loves a movie because you're supposed to. I hated You, Me, and Dupree and didn't go for Wedding Crashers. I didn't really care for Elf, nor Talladega Nights. So am I on crack? 'Cause Dustin, you seem to hold a serious grudge against this movie. Like this review is something I feel would normally be reserved for Norbit or Epic Movie, you know?

Posted by: Stacey at August 30, 2007 3:07 AM

This is actually pretty funny, may not the laugh-out-loud type, but I did do a few chuckles especially from some of the lines like...
"she's colder than dry ice... what's colder than dry ice?"
"Banned for life... that's a really long time"


And oh by the way Nancy Kerrigan is HOT
well... hotter than Heder anyway

Posted by: Calvin at September 12, 2007 12:09 PM