balls.jpg

Cinematic Swamp Ass

Balls of Fury / Dustin Rowles

Film Reviews | August 31, 2007 | Comments (78)


Christ in a goddamn wastebasket. This is how we emerge from Classics Week? With Balls of Fury? It feels like the reverse bends; I’ve gone from so high to so low so quickly, I’ve got compression sickness — I just shot a brain loogey out my left ear. I know that the last week in August is supposed to be the dumping grounds for studio flotsam, but for fuck’s sake, a Jersey landfill full of 100 years of excrement-filled non-biodegradable Huggies isn’t enough to mask the funky-ass month-old testicle-sweat stink of Balls of Fury.

And who the hell is Ben Garant, and why did they let him behind a camera? No. Why do they let him exist? “The State” was decent, but that’s not enough to give this guy fucking carte blanche in Hollywood to write and direct anything he wishes. Lookit: This is what he’s written when not working on “Reno: 911!” (and even that was of arguable comedic merit): Herbie: Fully Loaded, Let’s Go to Prison, The Pacifier, Night at the Museum and Taxi. Is there a worse writer in Hollywood? Besides Donald Rumsfeld, is there any one man responsible for more suffering these last three years than Ben Garant? Hell, I have to hand it to the guy. I thought Captivity was the death knell of torture porn, and that I Know Who Killed Me was its last, rasping cough before the genre choked to death on its own sputum. But, Garant has found a way to resurrect it: Now, instead of witnessing the torture on screen, we get to be the victims of it. Smart, Ben. Real fucking smart. You cock monkey.

Can Balls of Fury really be that bad? Ummm … yeah. Actually, maybe a little worse. I mean, when a film fails to elicit a single laugh from an entire audience of 12-year-olds, you know you’re more off base than a philandering army wife with a bad case of the black snake moan. Balls of Fury was terrible; an inept script executed with all the skill of a drunken firing squad aiming shotguns with all the propulsive power of a wet fart. You may not die watching Balls of Fury, but you’ll wish you had. The only saving grace is that, like the trauma of childbirth, I thankfully forgot most of what I witnessed seconds after leaving the theater. Thank fucking God for shock.

But, from what I do remember, Balls of Fury featured the divine “talents” of one Dan Fogler, the most obnoxious, loathsome piece of tub Hollywood has ever shat out of its gangrenous rectum. To say he’s a low-rent Jack Black would be a disservice to cockroach infested, crime-ridden Section 8 housing. Where did this ass stain come from? Broadway? He won a goddamn Tony award? For serious? For what? Best dramatic performance by a fuckstick? The first I ever saw of the guy was in last year’s horrid School of Scoundrels and suddenly he’s freakin’ everywhere, infesting movie theaters like a parasite that feeds on paint fumes: He gets bigger and more brain dead every time I see him, and he’s got another seven flicks headed our way like a shitbrick shot out of an ass cannon, including a movie called The Number 13 in which he’ll portray Alfred Hitchcock.

I wish Hitchcock were alive so he could throw M. Night Shyamalan at Dan Fogler.

So the plot — not that it’s worth repeating — goes a little something like this: An 11-year-old Randy Daytona, the top-rated ping pong player in the world, suffers a humiliating defeat to an East German ping-ponger (Thomas Lennon, who co-wrote) during the ‘88 Olympics after he trips and knocks himself silly, uttering “I’m going to Disneyland,” from his stunned position on his back. That’s the joke … and one that would be a minor running gag throughout the film: The ironic use of “I’m going to Disneyland.” Vey.

Nineteen years later, Randy (Fogler) is doing some ping-pong show in some shitty Vegas establishment when he’s recruited by an FBI Agent (George Lopez, making what must be considerable pains to be even more insufferable and unfunny than usual, so as not to show up Fogler) to use his mad ping-pong skills to infiltrate an underground table-tennis tournament in Japan, run by Christopher Walken, who I think is supposed to be Asian in the film. You never really know with Walken — he’s got one gear, and it’s apparently kooky; I mean, is there anything else Walken can do? He’s got 109 credits to his name, and I bet they’re all variations of kooky: Asshole kooky (Wedding Crashers), authoritarian kooky (Catch Me If You Can), hokey kooky (Blast from the Past), psycho kooky (Pulp Fiction), disturbed kooky (The Deer Hunter), awesome kooky (Fatboy Slim’s video), what-the-fuck kooky (Gigli) and, his most popular variation of late: Paycheck kooky.

Whatever. After a series of stupid, moronic, dumbass, fuckwitted Karate Kid style training sessions with a blind mentor (who uses the same chopsticks to jam into nostrils, vice testicles, and eat with) and his daughter (Maggie Q, whose one joke in the film is to call everyone “table jockey”), Randy finds himself in the tournament, where a loss results in death. And you’d imagine, since it’s a ping pong movie, that there’d be more ping pong in it. But, because the table tennis is the only thing in Balls of Fury with entertainment-like substance, there’s surprisingly little of it in the film, largely — I’m guessing — because Dan Fogler was too out of shape to keep up with the heavy demands of swinging a goddamn paddle in the air. God, I hate him. He’s an embarrassment to the Def Leppard T-shirt he wears in the film. Is there a way to DeFoglerize movies? To edit him out and replace him with a giant dungheap? I’m telling you: That man is a waste of carbon. I’d suggest wiping your ass with the film stock if it weren’t such a goddamn insult to toilet paper.

Dustin Rowles is the publisher of Pajiba. He lives with his wife and son in Ithaca, New York. You may email him, or leave a comment below.


Death Sentence | Halloween



Comments

If this even makes the screens here in the UK I will be amazed.

Posted by: nevin at August 31, 2007 10:36 AM

I saw a commercial for this, and thought, "I guess people have to get paid, right?"

Posted by: mojojojo at August 31, 2007 10:41 AM

So, I guess it's safe to say you didn't like this movie?

Posted by: rlr260 at August 31, 2007 10:41 AM

Tell us what you really think!

Posted by: Blackcapricorn at August 31, 2007 10:48 AM

Yeah, but was it good?

Posted by: TJack at August 31, 2007 10:49 AM

With all of the hilarious and brilliant imagery of this review, I think the overall tone boils down to:

"Divine...smart...kooky" - Dustin Rowles, Pajiba.com

That sounds like a good quote for the posters.

Posted by: MX at August 31, 2007 10:55 AM

Oh God, I so needed to read this this morning. I think my favorite bit is the stuff about Walken--it should be his IMDB profile. Thank you, thank you.

I never had any intention of seeing it, but I am still glad BofFexists in all its crepulence, for without it we would not have this...this masterpiece of articulate bile.

I am just so in love with you this morning, Dustin.

Posted by: Jerce at August 31, 2007 11:02 AM

*long low whistle* Damn! You're in fine form! It's a crying shame that you had to waste yourself on this shitty film though.
You have my sympathy.

Posted by: Chrissie at August 31, 2007 11:03 AM

You guys should do classics reviews more often before reviewing bad movies. It's like starving a junkyard dog and then releasing it on some unsuspecting tresspasser.

Posted by: twig at August 31, 2007 11:09 AM

Sigh.

I pesonally love Reno 911 and of course I loved the State, so I had always hoped that these guys' humor was just so particular that no one else knew how to present it. Hence the dogshit that's come out in their names.

I'm guessing not?

Posted by: Barabajagal at August 31, 2007 11:10 AM

I saw a preview of "Balls of Fury" recently on a Netflix DVD I just rented, and since I'd never heard of this movie, I thought for sure this was a straight to video release.

RE Christopher Walken: You forgot "John Travolta's beard" kooky.

Posted by: BWeaves at August 31, 2007 11:24 AM

Keep the hatred coming - it is so good to hear someone rail against the crap that is a total waste of money and resources to even make or show. And also, good for you - you may be the only other person who seems to notice that there were other people who should have known better that to be in Gigli.

Posted by: Chris X at August 31, 2007 11:26 AM

I'm kind of choking to death on the hyperbole and similes here--less is more. Much less.

I'm probably just bitter because you dissed Reno:911 and Christopher Walken all in one review, though. Man, wtf?

Posted by: sia at August 31, 2007 11:32 AM

Aw, fuck. Now I have to be that guy, that guy who I usually hate...

To say he's a low-rent Jack Black would be a disservice to cockroach infested, crime-ridden Section 8 housing.

Easy now. I work for an agency that provides low-income housing. No need to be insulting to the people who live there, nor those who provide it.

OK. Off pedestal. I'm disappointed in Maggie Q. And truthfully, after seeing the trailer, there was never a single moment where I even considered watching this movie. But again, Pajiba falls on the grenade for us and reviews it. So... thanks?

Posted by: TK at August 31, 2007 11:35 AM

I have no interest in seeing this movie--hell until now I didn't even know it existed-- but damn, this is one fucking awesome review. Sure, I loved Classics Week and I'm always happy when you guys point me to something decent I might miss or like something I hoped would be good, but the true joy I find in this site is reading reviews like this.

Bravo, Dustin. Bravo.

Posted by: telesilla at August 31, 2007 11:48 AM

This is the funniest piece of writing I have read in a very long time. I am tempted to request more moronic movies from Hollywood just so I can read your reviews of them. Of course, I won't have to ask for more bad movies since they are as plentiful as the bowel movements of prune addicts.

Thank you for making my day and for causing me to nasally regurgitate the peach smoothie I was drinking when I read the lines: " I thought Captivity was the death knell of torture porn, and that I Know Who Killed Me was its last, rasping cough before the genre choked to death on its own sputum. But, Garant has found a way to resurrect it: Now, instead of witnessing the torture on screen, we get to be the victims of it. Smart, Ben. Real fucking smart. You cock monkey." There's nothing like a peach smoothie snot with which to start the day.

Posted by: Will at August 31, 2007 11:49 AM

So the only movie that was in the header all week that you didn't review was The Third Man.

What the fuck gives, Paj?

Posted by: Bucko at August 31, 2007 11:55 AM

The thing is, Dustin honey, if you continue to be funny in direct relation to just how pissed off you are at having to watch and review a particular movie then you're going to keep getting landed with piles of festering excrement such as this one.

Honestly? I think there's a little part of you, deep down inside, that loves this shit.

I'm just glad that my boss has already skulked off to start the weekend early or I'd be in serious trouble (again) for cackling whilst at my computer. Superb review, keep 'em comin'.

Posted by: Alex the Odd at August 31, 2007 11:57 AM

A new rule of thumb. Any movie that shows a crotch hit in the trailer (which is supposed to be the real funny stuff to lure you in) can be automatically deemed a piece of shit.

In fact, I propose the National Crotch Act of 2007. No movie may use physical humor about any body part or function occurring between navel and kneecap, except sexual, where a board of three comedians must certify that it really is funny.

Posted by: ChuckV at August 31, 2007 11:59 AM

Wow, Dustin. Your hatred is in full form today. I can't blame you, I'm disappointed in Christopher Walken for even considering this garbage.

My favorite line was "hokey kooky." It just rolls off the tongue. I may have to use that.

Posted by: Brie at August 31, 2007 12:00 PM

Dear Dustin,

You're fun when you're cranky. Also, thank you for once again suffering infinite agonies to spare the rest of us. You're like Jesus, only pissed off and sleep deprived. Now hug the baby before that vein in your forehead pops.

Love,
Sarina

Posted by: Sarina at August 31, 2007 12:02 PM

I heard an interview with Christopher Walken on NPR a couple years ago. I'm paraphrasing, but a memorable exchange went thusly:

Interviewer: Looking at your resume it's clear that you've been in some of the most excellent and important films of the past thirty years. You've also been in some of the worst. How do you explain that?
Walken (in his trademark voice, probably said with a trademark inexlicably-creepy shrug): I like movies.

Posted by: sutherland at August 31, 2007 12:07 PM

Ha. I was afraid that DH would suggest we go see this tonight. But I'm gonna whip this out if he does:


"You may not die watching Balls of Fury, but you'll wish you had."


Hilarious. I bet the review was funnier than the movie.

Posted by: Sharon at August 31, 2007 12:11 PM

it's moments like these when I'm proudest to be a Pajibian.

Posted by: susan at August 31, 2007 12:48 PM

"I wish Hitchcock were alive so he could throw M. Night Shyamalan at Dan Fogler."

That? May be the greatest line ever written.

Posted by: Ginger at August 31, 2007 1:04 PM

Yep, Walken definitely blows Samuel Jackson away in the category of Actor Who Will Whore Himself Out For A Paycheck. Hell, Rocco Sifriedi and John Holmes have got nothing on those two. I think I could hire Walken to be in one of my family's vacation home videos for a carton of menthol cigs and a Welcome to Bakersfield shot glass. Walken should actually get the brunt of your rath, Dustin, as it is my understanding this movie couldn't get green lit until he jumped on board. I dont blame this Fogler dude. He needs the money. But what the hell is Walken's excuse?

Posted by: JP at August 31, 2007 1:07 PM

I pray to god that Christopher Walken was paid handsomely for this dreck.....at least one person should get some legitimate laughs from this!

Amazing, but what other actor could do such movie shit and still be regarded with respect (and yes, I'm a big Walken fan!)? Walken is the only one who comes to mind.

Posted by: courtney at August 31, 2007 1:07 PM

Yep, Walken definitely blows Samuel Jackson away in the category of Actor Who Will Whore Himself Out For A Paycheck. Hell, Rocco Sifriedi and John Holmes have got nothing on those two. I think I could hire Walken to be in one of my family's vacation home videos for a carton of menthol cigs and a Welcome to Bakersfield shot glass. Walken should actually get the brunt of your rath, Dustin, as it is my understanding this movie couldn't get green lit until he jumped on board. I dont blame this Fogler dude. He needs the money. But what the hell is Walken's excuse?

Posted by: JP at August 31, 2007 1:07 PM

That was TFA Dustin! Best review I've read of anything in some time; vitriolic, snarky, angry and just about perfect!

Posted by: Brite at August 31, 2007 1:18 PM

"Paycheck Kooky" = so funny, so true

Anyway, I am happy to see reviews for crap movies again; I find them more entertaining than reviews of good films. And really, at least there will be one entertaining thing about this movie - this review.

Posted by: lizzy at August 31, 2007 1:34 PM

My middle school daughter was dying to see this movie. Because, don't you know, middle school is apparently when you can start going to see movies without your parents, and the first big parent-free outing was to be this movie.

Thank you, Pajiba, for handing me the phrase "You may not die watching Balls of Fury, but you'll wish you had" to use as a reason for denying her the pleasure.

Posted by: Wednesday at August 31, 2007 1:51 PM

Sharon- you have to be a knottie! "DH"? Love it!

Posted by: Agent Scully at August 31, 2007 1:55 PM

RE: Walken - It's a long way down from The Deer Hunter....................................

RE: Lennon et al - Am I the only one who doesn't think those from "The State" haven't done anything funny since? Reno is a trainwreck and I've never made it through an entire episode, despite repeated attempts to do so because of my pre-existing love of "The State". Anyone else on the same wavelength?

Posted by: TrulySadlyDeeply at August 31, 2007 1:58 PM

Walken's character in Catch Me if You Can was anything but "authoritarian." I take it you didn't actually see the film?

Posted by: bartap at August 31, 2007 2:31 PM

There's an poster for this "film" right above one of the urinals at my favorite neighborhood bar. Should I put in a suggestion that they move it to inside the urinal or would that be an insult to urine?

Posted by: Greg P. at August 31, 2007 2:48 PM

If you wanted to see a movie about an inane game and still maintained the high you had for classics week, you should have gone and seen King of Kong. Seriously? King of Kong was one of the best movies of the year.

Posted by: Tanner at August 31, 2007 2:49 PM

"I wish Hitchcock were alive so he could throw M. Night Shyamalan at Dan Fogler."

Fucking brilliant. I almost wet my pants laughing.....then I scrolled down to "paycheck kooky" and did.

Bravo

Posted by: Finn at August 31, 2007 2:52 PM

I used to think "The State" and its cast members were cool and perhaps infallible. I now know only to trust the Stella crowd. Lieutenant Dangle and Deputy Junior are money hungry Hollywood whores. What happened?

Posted by: Mark at August 31, 2007 3:05 PM

I think you just set a record for poop references in a review.
Nice one!

Posted by: Natalie at August 31, 2007 3:49 PM

Why Christopher Walken, why? Just come over to my matchbox sized studio apartment and I'll cook you chicken and give you red wine and we can sit down and I'll explain to you that it is possible to be as poor as me and still happy and therefore, no you don't need to keep taking everything your agent sends you.

Posted by: missmle at August 31, 2007 3:56 PM

Best. Movie. Review. EVER!

Posted by: Armando at August 31, 2007 4:02 PM

Just want to thank you guys for Classic Week. It prompted me to think about some great films, many of which I should have seen years ago, and in the process discover some new favourites (I'm still dizzy from Black Narcissus).

Of course, with stuff like "paycheck kooky", I'm glad regular Pajiba is back, too.

Posted by: Ashers at August 31, 2007 4:14 PM

"He's an embarrassment to the Def Leppard T-shirt he wears in the film."

I'm glad it's not a Zeppelin t-shirt.

Posted by: LL at August 31, 2007 5:11 PM

"like a shitbrick shot out of an ass cannon" your turn of phrase makes me tentpole my trousers, if I was batting for the other team I would put your poster on my wall

Posted by: evil homer at August 31, 2007 5:12 PM

Dustin your writing is so amazingly versatile, I love it! This knd of stuff makes me so happy I discovered Pajiba.

Posted by: Gaby at August 31, 2007 5:49 PM

what's sad is that this review of a crap movie has so far more comments than the review of a streetcar named desire/on the waterfront

Posted by: gunter at August 31, 2007 6:32 PM

Scathing, thy name is Dustin. You had me at "Christ in a goddammed waste basket."

I have a confession to make about Christopher Walken. I first encountered him as widowed farmer Jacob Whitting in "Sarah Plain and Tall," and so ever after associated him with the recalcitrant family man who managed to win Glenn Close's heart. Yeah.
To this day that is all my mother knows him as, so when she saw the BoF trailer on TV, she was aghast that he would associate himself with such a weird movie. Mummy dear, if only you knew.

Posted by: Lizzie Bennet at August 31, 2007 6:48 PM

Meh, this is very similar to Beerfest and I like Reno 911, I'll actually pay to see it.

So they can make more.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at August 31, 2007 7:24 PM

I would still like to know why there was no review of The Third Man, please.

Posted by: Bucko at August 31, 2007 7:26 PM

By the way, is swamp ass anything like mud butt?

Posted by: JP at August 31, 2007 8:04 PM

What I'd like to know is why anyone would think we need more Jack Black in any form, low or high rent. There's enough of that guy in High Fidelity to last an eternity.

Be careful, though, Dustin. You might want to take out that italicized sentence about where you live, or Dan Fogler might come and sit on your family.

Posted by: Diana at August 31, 2007 8:11 PM

Here's why he gets to direct a feature: A Night at the Museum: $573 Million dollars of box office. If you ever create anything that makes $573 Million dollars of anything - you'll be granted certain wishes as well.

Posted by: Henry at August 31, 2007 8:37 PM

I wish Hitchcock were alive so he could throw M. Night Shyamalan at Dan Fogler.

That's just brilliant.

And yes, Dan Fogler won a Tony award, and I still don't know how. His character was insufferable and based around one giant gimmick the brilliant, Tony award winning playwright Rachel Sheinkin came up with years ago. Any other performer in the show, but especially the cheated-out-of-her-Tony-win-by-an-equally-awful-and-gimmicky-performance Celia Keenan-Bolger, deserved to win but him. Even the guy who just read the definitions on stage. Even the little kid planted in the audience who "knew" how to "spell" during the audience participation. Anyone but Fogler. Worse win in years, and that's not an exageration. Seriously, even the guy from Chitty Chitty Bang Bang who mysteriously got nominated deserved it more.

The sad thing is, he probably can act. But why act like a real actor when you can bumble around like a fat idiot and live on easy street?

Posted by: Robert at August 31, 2007 8:57 PM

"Best dramatic performance by a fuckstick?"

Dear god, I love you!

Posted by: clarity at September 1, 2007 7:15 AM

Ben Garant and Thomas Lennon have both said in a few interviews that their writing credit is usually only on there for the first draft or so, before they are eaten alive by studio rewrites. They swear to god that the first draft of "Night At The Museum" was hilarious.

But this doesn't sound funny to begin with, I wonder how they could pass the buck on this one?

Posted by: GoreMotel at September 1, 2007 12:08 PM

...you know you're more off base than a philandering army wife with a bad case of the black snake moan.




I think that's my favorite quote to ever come out of a Pajiba review. Thank you.

When I first saw the previews for this movie, I thought to myself, "Who would see this?"

Did they show to only funny bits in the previews again so there's absolutely no gags whatsoever?

Posted by: grace at September 1, 2007 10:21 PM

I'm commenting for the first time...not enough of a fanatic to actively try to be the first to post a comment...so by the time I get around to it enough other people have said something similar that I'm quelled by the "me too-ishness" of it all.

Having said all that, I can't let the Hitchcock/Shyamalan line go by without heaping praise upon it -- no matter how many others do the same.

That was insanely brilliant!

Posted by: Grover at September 2, 2007 7:28 AM

Christopher Walken and Clarence Williams III are the same people. I've heard a few people say they want to see this but on dvd which is where I was gonna watch it. Maybe.

Posted by: Candy at September 2, 2007 3:41 PM

Grover,
Please continue to post whenever you can. I myself am just a weekend Pajiba reader, but I do read ALL of the comments (witness this one), and I hope maybe you'll read some of my late posts, too.
Any Pajiba reader wants to be part of this great site once they've gotten a taste of it- best part is, the ones who really enjoy this site have the very best taste and sense of humor, and one can feel proud to post along with them if they feel so inclined.
Like I just did.

Posted by: TMax at September 2, 2007 5:18 PM

this review is spot on with the movie.i had to see it today cuz my aunts husband didn'et want to take his kid too see it.so insteed my dad took him.while it was'ent the worest movie i've seen..eh it was'ent that great at all

Posted by: ann at September 2, 2007 7:51 PM

Ugh, people, all this jacking off the reviewer is a little embarrassing jeeeeez.

Have a little dignity.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at September 3, 2007 7:27 AM

SO many funny comments in this review, but this one's a keeper... I wish I could work it into daily conversation: "Best dramatic performance by a fuckstick?"

Posted by: Mary at September 3, 2007 12:26 PM

I was forced to see this piece of utter shite with a 14 year old. Sitting in the row in back of me were these girls commenting on how skinny Maggie Q was and laughing and yelling out gross every ten seconds. I want that hour and half back, it was so unfair, I came this close to convincing the girl to see Superbad instead, because at least I could put up with a film about high school losers rehashed (again) yet so much better than this utter waste of time. It was horrifyingly BAD!! Who the hell is Dan Fogler anyway?! He deserves a fate worse than death. And why has Christopher Walken whored himself out so much these days? He was in True Romance and had the best cameo EVER as a mafioso! I miss those days soooo much! He needs to realize that he is COOL and a great actor and just STOP with the shitty films already!

Posted by: ph at September 3, 2007 6:07 PM

I got bored so....

ass- 7
damn- 4
fuck- 7
shit- 2
hell- 2
cock- 1
ass-related- 6

Not bad. Not a record but respectable.

Posted by: Sara at September 3, 2007 9:01 PM

The review was funny - although I DO plan on seeing the movie. I'm a sucker for things that I can laugh at without having to think. If I had to think at all I'd get a headache. =)

And JP "I think I could hire Walken to be in one of my family's vacation home videos for a carton of menthol cigs and a Welcome to Bakersfield shot glass." I heard Walken's demands went up - in addition to the cigs and shot glass he wants one of those "action pens" where the picture slides back and forth at the top of the pen.

When you are in demand you can get pretty much whatever you want. Sure, he might fleece me out of my Statue of Liberty floaty pen, but I'll get some bitchin' vacation pics.

Posted by: Clevegal42 at September 4, 2007 10:22 AM

I'm surprised there has been no mention of how much Dan Folger looks like the spawn of Booger from Revenge of the Nerds.

Posted by: redkitten at September 4, 2007 12:23 PM

Clevegal42: Thanks for the update. Fuck Walken and his excessive demands. Malcovich is better for the role of "Crazy Uncle" anyway. And he says he'll accept generic cigs.

Posted by: JP at September 4, 2007 3:43 PM

Unfortunately, I had to sit through this one with my nine year old!



"Did they show to only funny bits in the previews again so there's absolutely no gags whatsoever?"



YES.!

Posted by: K- at September 4, 2007 4:42 PM

Ummm...he was doing ping pong acts in some shitty RENO establishment...RENO! Not Vegas...get it right!!

Posted by: Titans at September 4, 2007 5:25 PM

Ummm...he was doing ping pong acts in some shitty RENO establishment...RENO! Not Vegas...get it right!!

Posted by: Titans at September 4, 2007 5:25 PM

Shut up, bartap.

Posted by: AM at September 4, 2007 7:15 PM

the words "cinematic swamp ass" floated around in my head all day. finally, i had to go back and actually read the review. if a terrible movie like BOF can inspire a crap-tastic review like this one, then maybe there's hope for us all.

Posted by: infiniteskyline at September 5, 2007 1:51 AM

Dan Fogler is a comic genius. Everything that he's in is hilarious ... except that it isn't.

Posted by: Andmond Fixoby at September 5, 2007 3:38 PM

ok... i hadn't planned on seeing this one. But I guess the trailers didn't do it justice. Now I won't usually pay to go see a "bad" movie. But any movie so god-awful it could elicit that kind of reaction probably does warrant the 8 bucks. If for no other reason than I want to be able to scathe it with that kind of authority too!

Posted by: kristen at September 6, 2007 11:37 AM

"I wish Hitchcock were alive so he could throw M. Night Shyamalan at Dan Fogler."
-- this line made my day

Posted by: Arthur Dent at September 8, 2007 7:51 PM

Forgive me, Pajiba, for I have sinned.

I laughed, way more than I should have, at this movie.

Maybe it was because I kept saying, every time Dan Fogler appeared on the screen and did something stupid (that was redundant), He won a Tony Award. Maybe it was because Lennon goose stepping in short shorts is never not funny. Or maybe because I could just catch out of the corner of my eye the glimmer of hope this film promised, and how it was crushed by a studio.

One day, Lennon will get his film made, and it will be brilliant.

This piece of crap was not it.

(For anyone curious enough to ask, I rate it a 3/10, though I no longer know if I can count to 10 after viewing it).

Posted by: Robert at September 11, 2007 10:05 PM

Jesus, this is gold. Dude, you rock.

Posted by: Dee at September 15, 2007 11:52 AM

Id just like to agree that Dan Fogler is one of the most annoying actors out there. I felt mad after watching this movie because he was just that annoying.
If anyone hires him for another movie... PLEASE... and i mean PLEASE give him a gym membership or atleast have a treadmill brought in for him. He looked like a ball of grease throughout the whole movie and he tries to steal Jack Black style comedy. Jack Black can atleast be funny and he is no as obese as this little troll is.

that is all... im still so annoyed!

oh yea... the movie SUCKED! worst movie EVER
plot=crap, writing=crap

Posted by: Anthony at November 27, 2007 3:15 AM