free counter with statistics Arctic Tale | Scathing Reviews for Bitchy People

at1.png

People Suck. Run Along Now.

Arctic Tale / Agent Bedhead

Film Reviews | August 22, 2007 | Comments (32)


Vibrant imagery is one of the hallmarks of a National Geographic film, and watching twin polar bear cubs roll down an icy hill like tiny snowballs is much preferable to flipping open an issue of National Geographic magazine to discover, say, endless photos of naked pygmies. Adults and children alike will enjoy Arctic Tale for its stunning visuals and almost unbelievable displays of glistening icebergs and countless shades of ice-blue. These spectacles are admittedly captivating, and viewers should be cautioned not to attach themselves to animals that just might plunge though the melting ice at any moment. This film footage is presented courtesy of directors Adam Ravetch and Sarah Robertson, who spent 15 years filming the seriously fucked-up habitat of the creatures that dwell upon the polar ice cap. In this land of extremes, fledgling polar bears and walruses fight to keep the status quo on a continent that just might not exist in 2040 if human beings don’t decide to stop, well, being human. Basically, folks, we’re all just gonna die, but at least we get to see some really cute polar bears before we go.

Despite the filmmakers’ desire to present Arctic Tale as a companion movie, or even a bona fide successor to March of the Penguins, this isn’t the case. In fact, Arctic Tale isn’t even a documentary film, it’s a doc-fiction hybrid that the directors describe as a “wildlife adventure.” The audience is led to believe that this adventure lends us an exclusive glimpse into the life cycles of “Nanu” the polar bear and “Seela” the walrus, which catalyzes a lovely audience attachment to these creatures. The footage is brilliantly edited, and to the most naive viewers (e.g., children), the film appears to follow the same polar bear and walrus from childhood into adulthood. In actuality, several Nanu and Seela understudies waited in anticipation for their chance at stardom and fame — the twin storylines are cut and spliced from 800+ hours of raw footage filmed over a period of 15 years. Only after the footage was edited did screenwriters Linda Woolverton, Mose Richards, and Kristen Gore draft an episodic plot and then weave the tales of Nanu and Seela into screenplay format. If that last name fails to register, then perhaps you are of the film’s true target audience — too young to even question filmmaker motives.

As an old cowboy saying goes, never trust a cowhand that doesn’t know how to properly tie a horse. In this case, the cowhand would be the film’s insufferable narrator, Queen Fucking Latifah. Through her omnipresent narration of Arctic Tale, the inevitable animal anthropomorphization occurs, by which Nanu and Seela are likened to teenage girls that the boys are beginning to notice, but we are assured that our female heroines don’t have time for boys because they’re too busy putting on mascara. This projection of human qualities onto animals is beyond tacky, and the hugely overdone flatulence jokes take the film into Howard Stern “Fartman” territory. What little credibility remains is quickly finished off by “hip” musical interludes, including Kool and the Gang’s “Celebrate” (during a walrus clam feast) and The Pointer Sisters’ “We Are Family” (during the walrus group orgies frolicking). During the underwater shots, the vividness and clarity of the animal close-ups are truly spectacular — almost too much so — creating some suspicion that a dash of CGI assistance might have been involved. Filmmaker Ravetch reportedly filmed these underwater portions 30 or 40 minutes at a time while wearing a protective dry suit to keep hypothermia at bay. Of course, it’s beyond the capacity of laymen to judge whether CGI was used to enhance the shots, just as it is beyond Queen Latifah’s ability to say whether all of this global warming shiznit is truly the fault of human beings or just part of the Earth’s cyclic nature. The film never really explains how humans destroy the Earth, but the narration would have us believe that the ice cracks appear merely because humans are naughty and need to be spanked. Yow!

Indeed, Arctic Tale would transmit a more powerful message to its audience if it had merely supplied the visual imagery without all the dogmatic narrative supplemented by completely brainless (yet totally hip!) remarks such as “all up in each others’ bidness” and “those sweet ‘staches aren’t just for stylin’.” It isn’t necessary for Queen Latifah to tell us that the walrus is swimming, for it is plainly obvious to viewers that, hot damn, that walrus is swimming. Perhaps this overbearing commentary is meant to unconsciously establish the narrator as an authority on all arctic matters (or at least, the ones she can read from the script itself). Yet no arguments based on fact are actually spoken by the narrator, but for the logical fallacies that Latifah keeps handy in her cache of lyrical genius. If anything, this method does nothing but teach children how to blindly follow the loudest argument, and certainly, someone will eventually yell at them louder than Latifah does. Serious issues like the ones raised in Arctic Tale deserve more thoughtful and coherent arguments than the ones provided here (though, if Queen Latifah ever narrates a movie about naked pygmies, I am so there).

At the end of Arctic Tale, children appear on the screen to tell us that every time you flip a light switch, a polar bear falls through a hole in the ice. This bluntest of statements could stand a bit more scientific detail for the benefit of most children, who haven’t yet developed the critical thinking skills to realize that the light switches are not directly connected to the melting ice. So mommy … did I just kill seven polar bears today?

Agent Bedhead lives in Tulsa, Oklahoma and prefers the warmer climates. She shows up daily at agentbedhead.com.









End of Days | Pajiba Love 08/22/07


Comments

Good review. And as for the movie? Thanks but no thanks. If I want nature red in tooth and claw, I'll pop in my Planet Earth DVD's, which is perhaps the greatest collection of nature footage ever, without pretense or preachiness or, God forbid Queen La-fucking-tifah. Plus, the footage of the polar bear cubs in PE is goddamned adorable.

Posted by: TK at August 22, 2007 1:01 PM

The Queen couldn't possibly be worse that Sigourney Weaver's dry, lifeless voice-over for the otherwise awesome "Planet Earth", could she?

Posted by: ciji at August 22, 2007 1:12 PM

good review, but i've got to agree with TK, i'm going to pass on this one...especially when i hear phrases like "all up in each others' bidness" are floating around in it. ick.

Posted by: smash at August 22, 2007 1:15 PM

AH HA! ciji, you are in for a treat. Run, do not walk, and get the DVD's. Because the DVD of Planet Earth? NO SIGOURNEY WEAVER! The narrator is none other than the original TV naturalist himself, Mr. David Attenborough. And he is wonderful.

Posted by: TK at August 22, 2007 1:15 PM

good review, but i've got to agree with TK, i'm going to pass on this one...especially when i hear phrases like "all up in each others' bidness" are floating around in it. ick.

Posted by: smash at August 22, 2007 1:15 PM

Yep. Next to Planet Earth, cutsey attempts like this or March of the Penguins pale in comparison.
Actually they don't pale - they reek.

Anyhow, for those who love Planet Earth, you may wish to seek out its predecessor: The Blue Planet. It's dazzling, enlightening and downright awesome.

Incidentally, do you guys have the David Attenborough narration over there, or do you have someone more local? Just curious....

Posted by: Simon B at August 22, 2007 1:17 PM

Sounds a little more like Milo and Otis than March of the Penguins.
I rather liked the former.

Posted by: yazikus at August 22, 2007 1:19 PM

Zzzz. I'll pass on this one. And I love Queen Latifah, but the "bidness" language...no, thank you. I'd rather watch "The Future is Wild" the futuristic documentary from Animal Planet. I wonder if anyone remembers that...

Posted by: Brie at August 22, 2007 1:30 PM

Ahhh, I love me some Blue Planet.

Posted by: Agent Scully at August 22, 2007 1:58 PM

supplemented by completely brainless (yet totally hip!) remarks such as "all up in each others' bidness" and "those sweet 'staches aren't just for stylin'."

Ugh, so it's true about the ersatz hip-hop narration . . . far be it from me to go all PC po-po on your asses, but this narrator role smacks strongly of a latter day Uncle Remus -- "black dialect" narration of a tale for the amusement of a largely white audience, tittering because they get it, how the negroes talk and all. "An' den ah tol' dat bwah, 'shet dee do'.'" (Okay, that was Huck Finn, not Uncle Remus, but it's what I know from memory.)

Or is this an appeal to a black audience? (*cue Dave Chappelle white-man voice*: Come on in! We're speaking your language, homies!)

Queen Latifah, WTF are you doing? And Al Gore's kid should know better than to be patronizing in such a way. Bwuh.

Posted by: socalledonlycousins at August 22, 2007 2:04 PM

What continent are they on again? Just messin'.

I love Blue Planet and Planet Earth...although they both make me cry. I usually make the husband fast-forward through any scenes that involve baby animals being mauled to death. I can do without those.

Posted by: Kolby at August 22, 2007 2:26 PM

Wait. So are you saying that Queen Latifah wrote the narration? Or are you just accusing her of reading the narration as written.
Because this:
Yet no arguments based on fact are actually spoken by the narrator, but for the logical fallacies that Latifah keeps handy in her cache of lyrical genius. If anything, this method does nothing but teach children how to blindly follow the loudest argument, and certainly, someone will eventually yell at them louder than Latifah does.

Makes it sound as if she wrote the narration with some type of brain washing agenda in mind. And while I don't mind QL in general, I never really thought she was smart enough to do the whole, brainwash small children thing. Of course I could be completely wrong on that score. For all I know she has a special machine just for the purpose of brainwashing small children. And writes all kinds of bad narration so that she can use her "lyrical genius" to indoctrinate small children and their unsuspecting parents into some liberal agenda.

Posted by: cmoody at August 22, 2007 2:45 PM

In this land of extremes, fledgling polar bears and walruses fight to keep the status quo on a continent that just might not exist in 2040 if human beings don't decide to stop, well, being human.

Are you saying that the current materialist culture dominating the earth and causing it extreme damage (even if you don't want to attribute global warming entirely to humans) is the only way to be human? Because if so, I must strongly disagree.

Don't get me wrong, I'm sure this is truly a piece of crap movie, but you seem a little too skeptical of the overall notion that we should be imparting any sort of environmental responsibility on our children.

Posted by: Diana at August 22, 2007 2:57 PM

"you flip a light switch, a polar bear falls through a hole in the ice"

My dad's gonna be pissed he never came up with that one. I'll be passing on this though. Outside of cartoons, I can't stand anthropomorphized animals.

Posted by: audrey at August 22, 2007 3:04 PM

Diana, I think what the reviewer is saying is that humankind is on a destructive path right now. I don't read it as that is the "way to be human", but rather as a cautionary statement in relation to the current state of affairs. Which I think is absolutely correct.

Posted by: TK at August 22, 2007 3:27 PM

Speaking of David Attenborough (sp?) he did several brilliant NOVA programs, including the Secret Life of Animals and the Secret Life of Plants which are fascinating and of the highest quality. We watched part of one in class once and the class afterwards convinced the professor to let us watch more because it was so good.

Posted by: Anne (in Reno) at August 22, 2007 3:40 PM

The Planet Earth that is available currently in stores (with all of the discs) is the BBC version, with David Attenborough, and it looks like slightly different editing. If you want the Discovery Channel version you might have watched on TV they're releasing it disc by disc, to pad the wallet a little I suppose.

PE made my HD-DVD player worth having.

Posted by: Stacy at August 22, 2007 4:45 PM

But if you mute the television and put on Pink Floyd's Dark Side of the Moon.... Your reviews are always better than the movie.

Posted by: kenneth at August 22, 2007 8:05 PM

I thought polar bears eat walruses. Or is it walrusii. Anyway here's a metaphor for the end of the world; ebonics in an arctic adventure tale.

Beer please. Early and often...

Posted by: RW at August 22, 2007 8:37 PM

Thanks for the replies on DA. Special kudos to ciji and TK who answered my question as I was still typing it!

Posted by: Simon B at August 23, 2007 3:19 AM

At the end of Arctic Tale, children appear on the screen to tell us that every time you flip a light switch, a polar bear falls through a hole in the ice.

HAHAHAHAHAHA, AAAHAHA, HAHA... *wipes tears from her eyes*

This is why my mom didn't want me to watch ecological cartoons when I was little. Most of them are terribly manipulative and want children to feel guilty about things that are out of their control.

Posted by: MJ at August 23, 2007 10:10 AM

Would we (sort of) care so much if baby polar bear cubs weren't cute? I mean, nobody seems to be wringing their hands over that whole dianosaur extinction thing... ditto for pandas.

Posted by: courtney at August 23, 2007 10:31 AM

Point taken about the cuteness, but ... well ... er ... we weren't really responsible for the extinction of the dinosaurs. I find it awfully hard to feel guilty about animals that died out millions of years before my birth.

But yes, environmentalists know by now that it's smart to use cute animals as advertisement to convince people to join the fight to save them - thereby saving many others. One of my teachers once showed us a flyer from an animal protection agency that showed a bunch of fluffy puppies and kittens. Apparently most of the money went to animals like endangered frogs and shellfish - but they're not putting crabs on a flyer.

Posted by: Claire at August 23, 2007 12:52 PM

Sorry to go on about David Attenborough (though I can think of few subjects worthier), but there's a great interview with him posted today, in the Arts & Entertainment section of the timesonline site.

Warning - it may make you admire him even more....

Posted by: Simon B at August 23, 2007 1:25 PM

Simon B, no need to apologize. I think he's a fascinating character. Bit of trivia - it is said that it may well be that he's the most well-traveled person on the planet. I think that's amazing.

As for the "cuteness" thing - I think that the average person is more likely to sympathize with the cute animals (although who said pandas aren't cute? Have you seen that show about them being raised in China? Friggin' adorable!), those who pay attention to environmental concerns don't care about cute, they care about the whole spectrum.

Except for mosquitoes. I hope those fuckers disappear and never come back.

Posted by: TK at August 23, 2007 3:21 PM

Does flipping on a light switch on earth make everything so hot that it creates another storm on Jupiter? Jupiter is growing a new red spot, Neptune and Saturn are all getting hotter and people are worried about frickin' polar bears? We are all going to die and it's the polar bears that people cry over. People are insane.

Posted by: Eli at August 23, 2007 10:50 PM

Wonderful. A reviewer who does not believe in global warming.

Posted by: poppy at August 24, 2007 12:59 AM

And that was said with sarcasm and frustrated resignation.

Posted by: Poppy at August 24, 2007 1:03 AM

Poppy: It's the audience manipulation that the reviewer doesn't abide by. My father worked in the artic for years - always said polar bears were brutally dangerous and "not so cute". Smelled really badly, too...can't really use that one in a Disney-type docufaketary.
Educate folks to care about the planet because that is the responsible thing to do, not because the baby bears are going to die if you open your frige or because it's trendy.

Posted by: courtney at August 24, 2007 9:54 AM

Why do I keep hearing, "Everytime a bell rings, an angel gets its' wings" in my head, in comparison to that lame ass eco-scare tactic!

I guess we'll have the expansion of the Sahara Desert and the following of Clive the Camel and Debbie the Desert Asp narrated by Michael Flatley of LOTD fame next!

Posted by: samson at August 24, 2007 1:00 PM

Saw this for free last week and still wanted my money back. Most of the low points have already been covered, save one. (Dons flame-resistant suit). Very strong feminist (lesbian?) themes throughout. Mama Walrus has a bigger walrus around who acts as the familys protector, but its no Daddy - it's Auntie (yes, really). Daddy Walrus is nowhere to be found. Better yet, not only is Daddy Polar Bear not around, but he will kill off Baby Polar Bear and fight Mama for food if she "gets up in his grill". (OK, I made that last quote up, but it wouldnt have been out of place). If we're going to anthropomorphize, all these male/Daddy polar animals lack are some CGI-ed tanktops and six-packs of PBR.

Posted by: Wagon of Fury at August 24, 2007 1:42 PM

Really enjoyed the post! I've blogged about Starbucks promotion of the eco-friendly Arctic Tale, while they continue to lack a corporate recycling program.
Starbucks + Arctic Tale + Global Warming = Corporate Hypocrisy

Posted by: Rob D. at August 25, 2007 5:56 PM



searchthesite.jpg