blogspot
visitor
American Teen | Pajiba - Scathing Reviews for Bitchy People

americanteen3.jpg

I Am So Popular. Everbody Loves Me So Much at This School.


American Teen / Daniel Carlson

Film Reviews | July 28, 2008 | Comments (27)


The defining moment of Nanette Burstein’s documentary American Teen comes more than halfway through the film, when Megan, a popular blonde prone to mood swings, is arguing with a friend, an equally popular and equally blonde young woman who wants Megan to join her at a party. They’re sitting in Megan’s kitchen — well, Megan’s parents’ kitchen, at any rate — and having it out when the friend begins to casually remove her wireless microphone and roll up the cord around the battery box. She’s getting ready to storm out with a “Fuck this!” and a huffy exit, but before she can, she has to take off her mic, and she does so with a removed calm that belies the weirdness of the act. She’s not interested in making a big exit; her first priority is to make sure the microphone is carefully removed. It’s a subtle detail, but it shifts the scene’s focus, turning it from a spat between friends to one that must necessarily navigate the technological and mildly exploitative trappings required to film it in the first place. This is the whole point of American Teen, a film about a group of high school seniors in Indiana: Everything, even the private stuff, is done for show. That’s not to say the film is completely dishonest; there are, scattered throughout, the kind of alternately cringe-inducing, heartbreaking, and uplifting moments that perfectly reflect that moment of abject hell when you begin to really grow up. But they’re inextricably entwined with a fetishistic sense of self-disclosure that does more to reinforce the classic stereotypes of high schoolers than it does to open them up to broader and truer definitions. “You see us as you want to see us; in the simplest terms, in the most convenient definitions,” said the kids in John Hughes’ seminal The Breakfast Club. But while they meant it as a complaint, a battle cry against encroaching adulthood, Burstein seems to have viewed that line as a challenge to be met. And, sadly, meet it she does.

The film even begins with a nod to The Breakfast Club, as Hannah, one of the main characters, narrates about the first day of senior year, setting the stage for nine months’ worth of muddled drama. Incorporating interviews and sound bites from other students, including the central cast, Burstein quickly introduces Hannah, the artistic girl who doesn’t fit in with the conservative vibe of Warsaw, Indiana; Jake, the band geek struggling with acne and a deep need to get a girlfriend; Colin, the basketball star looking for a college scholarship; Megan, the affluent student council leader who sits perched atop the school’s “caste system”; and Mitch, another basketball player who will eventually cross paths with Hannah. If Mitch were a bad boy with an abusive father, you’d have modern-day replicas of Hughes’ caricatures; this is not necessarily a good thing. After that, Burstein begins the considerable task of charting the lives of these kids and their friends over the course of their final year of high school, and it turns out to be a blessing and a curse. On one hand, the story mostly writes itself, with everything from occasional obstacles like dances and championship games leading up to the high-stakes ending of college acceptance, graduation, and the false sense that you know what you’re doing with your life the moment you turn 18. But conversely, the film is a little too broadly focused: Trying to juggle the lives and futures of just five kids for 100 minutes is inherently going to mean skimping on depth, and that lack of introspection on behalf of the filmmaker starts to show up before too long. American Teen wants to play like a novelistic narrative, but it winds up feeling like a series of anecdotes pinned together by a consistency of cast and location.

Burstein’s biggest problem is her apparent unwillingness to provide context to situations that without it become overly melodramatic or archetypal. For instance, Colin is a bright kid and good ball player whose folks can’t afford to send him to college unless he lands a substantial scholarship. That kind of pressured storyline is nothing new in film or real life, right down to Colin’s lamenting that “if we don’t do well, the community’s gonna go nuts,” but things get even tougher when Colin’s dad tells him that without a scholarship, the boy is headed for the Army or Navy or somebody to foot the bill for a university education. It’s a weird escalation of the story made even more perplexing by the fact that Burstein offers no other evidence for the choice facing Colin: no discussion of the family’s income beyond Colin’s father’s classification that they’re “comfortable but not wealthy”; no examination of the family’s debt or employment issues, if any; basically no indication that this is anything other than a hyperserious threat without much history to give it sense. Then there’s Colin’s dad, whose job status is never discussed but who, just when the story couldn’t get what-the-fuckier, is seen more than once performing as an Elvis impersonator for groups of senior citizens. Is this how he earns a living? Is this a hobby? What’s going on? These are questions that even a second-rate fictional narrative would answer, but Burstein never says, and in doing so makes it clear that she’s just out to make a vaguely truthful, largely staged video essay about a group of kids who are likely more emotionally complex than the film can convey.

As the year rolls on, the central characters fall in and out of love, tumbling through the painful and confusing relationships that make for the most convincing moments of the film. Hannah gets her heart broken and loses the confidence she once had, struggling to understand why someone she loved could discard her, and it’s wrenching to see someone so young go through that for the first time; you want to tell her it gets easier, but then, you don’t want to lie to her, either. Jake is similarly lovelorn, a zit-laden kid who plays in the marching band, plays a lot of video games, and is filled with a self-loathing that borders on pity. The scene where he decided to ask out a freshman in the band by going to her house with red roses is achingly painful, and it’s these observations of a weird kid trying and failing to figure out life that require the least amount of polish or staging from Burstein. But even those moments are somehow nothing more than the expected painful scenes that are “supposed” to happen with the “geek.” What’s more, you’d think that Burstein, free from the bonds of network TV or some other dampening outlet, would use the film to at least go into some depth on the sexual battlefield teens find themselves walking, but nothing doing. This is a PG-13 documentary, and aside from one character’s post-coital mention of “fooling around,” no one even talks about sex. In this version of the world, it doesn’t exist.

Burstein’s shallowness shows in other areas, too. It comes as no surprise that Megan, prone to mood swings, does some terribly mean things to other girls at school, particularly a girl who starts spending time with a boy Megan knows and won’t admit to herself that she likes. Megan’s attack on the girl is devastating, the kind of reputation-ruining campaign that makes your jaw drop, but Megan’s never asked about feeling remorse, and the event disappears once the story plays out, just one more fading memory from high school. It would have been nice if Burstein had attempted to capture Megan on a larger scale, instead of the eventual character sketch she creates of a rich girl with a family tragedy fueling her occasional swings. It just feels so rote, so happy to reinforce the stereotypes — rich girl, athletic boy, geeky kid — that Burstein could have easily exploded if she’d just dug a little deeper.

But maybe I’m the one that’s digging too deep. I’d hoped that the film would be the kind of touching and enlightening look at a difficult time in all our lives, a time that’s already receding for me but still not too far gone. But American Teen is ultimately a silent ode to the first real generation to grow up steeped in reality TV and social networking, both of which familiarize users with a surreal version of life even while encouraging them to construct personas suitable for chatting. The kids in American Teen rely heavily on online communication and text messaging — one guy even has the balls to dump a girlfriend that way — but Burstein is regrettably quiet on what role that level of interpersonal communication plays in the way the kids develop, mature, and spend time with each other. The film is exploitive to the degree that it sidesteps issues of staged B-roll and acontextual situations played for broad pathos, but on the other hand, these kids have been posing all their lives. They’ve been practicing for the act of being filmed without even knowing it, which in some ways makes American Teen one of the more distressingly real documentaries in a long time.

Daniel Carlson is the managing editor of Pajiba and a low-level employee at a Hollywood industry magazine. You can visit his blog, Slowly Going Bald.


Exploits from Comic-Con 2008 Part III | I Love Money





Comments

I kind of wanted to see this, but I was nervous that it was not not going to be deep enough, which it sounds like it wasn't. however, this right here:

[...]these kids have been posing all their lives. They've been practicing for the act of being filmed without even knowing it, which in some ways makes American Teen one of the more distressingly real documentaries in a long time.

is a fascinating idea and makes me kind of want to see it. It's a shame you don't think it's better, Daniel; the idea is a good one, and in the right hands could have been an excellent documentary. Ah, well. I'll watch it anyway, I always do.

Posted by: Anastasia Beaverhausen at July 28, 2008 2:42 PM

Nice review. But the movie sounds like just another in a long list of want to be special, isn't high school hell/wonderful movies.

Posted by: EricD at July 28, 2008 2:42 PM

Enough with the "reality" programming. ENOUGH. It pains me to know that the most important thing teenagers think they could ever be is famous. It makes me ill to think that the parents of these kids agreed to allowing their Senior year be immortalized for public consumption. This voyeurism is disgusting and I believe it will only be harmful.

And I don't just mean this particular film, but all of it. Big Brother and The Bachelor and The mothereffing Baby Borrowers and the rest can all go suck it, the latter in particular. I can feel myself going off-topic, but when I saw previews for this, I was literally agape. Parents actually cosigned their babies to demonstrate to idiot teenagers what a punishment kids are?? Am I the crazy one, or does it seem like this could possibly be traumatizing to a child?

Wait..where the hell am I?? Oh yeah, reality-based entertainment. Bullshit. This is why kids believe they can be famous with out any discernable talent or extraordinary quality whatsoever. And it's why I hate MySpace.

Posted by: Mella at July 28, 2008 2:45 PM

It's not just the parents and the filmmakers who were exploitative; the school should be taken to task too for allowing and even promoting this whole mess. If things look staged in this film, it's becuase they are. The kids aren't just posing for the cameras. They're ACTING. This is a documentary only in the loosest sense of the word.

Posted by: idgiepug at July 28, 2008 2:51 PM

Wow, this sounds like it could have had a lot of potential. It's been just about ten years since I graduated, and I'm really interested in the disparities between teenagers today and those back in the late 90's. They seem so different than how I was...that makes me sound like my mother.

Ah high school. Now I need to go home, watch Empire Records, and listen to the Rent soundtrack.

Posted by: Julie at July 28, 2008 2:52 PM

This is why kids believe they can be famous with out any discernable talent or extraordinary quality whatsoever.

This is also partly due to the "everybody's special" mentality that is currently in vogue among schools and parents... nobody wants their kid to feel left out at awards night, so everybody gets an award, whether they worked for it or not. So, to me, as in Julie's sentiment, it's interesting to think about how that affects kids and gives them a sense of entitlement, as opposed to how it was when I grew up in the '70s, and you had to work at things and be good at them in order to win recognition. That's kind of why I want to see it.

Mella, is that really what Baby Borrowers was? Holy crap. That sounds godawful. I'm glad I never caught it.

Posted by: Anastasia Beaverhausen at July 28, 2008 3:00 PM

This is the first review I've read that hasn't fawned all over American Teenager and proclaiming it as a groundbreaking work. Interesting.

Personally, I'm not much for voyeuristic cinema, especially one that relies on awkward social moments in high school. Jeezy-peezy, there were parts of Freaks and Geeks that were too painful to watch and that was fiction.

Posted by: Alabamapink at July 28, 2008 3:01 PM

Yep, count me amongst the disappointed. I kind of perked up when I read about Megan's "devestating attack" on another girl (thought that might be some drama worth catching), but since the "event disappears once the story plays out," then why bother catching it?

Seems like an interesting enough idea, but it appears that the documentarian isn't quite up to the task.

Posted by: TMax at July 28, 2008 3:05 PM

In order to follow the repercussions of Megan's "devastating attack", you'd have to follow the girl who was attacked, not the attacker. The episode faded in the movie just like it probably faded in Megan's mind. At least in my experience, the attackers don't even remember what they did, and years later you see them in a supermarket and they want to talk about all the "good times" they had with you in high school. The teen years are all about me, me, me. If it doesn't happen TO you, it fades away, even if you're the one who did it.

Posted by: Three-nineteen at July 28, 2008 3:43 PM

I had the unique experience of getting to sit down over breakfast with these kids as they were touring through Austin. Given the laid back nature of the breakfast and the fact that it wasn't a publicity event, we were able to really engage. I wish the movie allowed you to really see these kids, especially how protective they are of one another, as if they didn't realize that the cameras meant that an audience might be watching. I liked the kids I got to have breakfast with. I wish you could have seen them onscreen.

Posted by: Kester at July 28, 2008 3:52 PM

So the semifictional "Fast Times at Ridgemont High" is still the most realistic film depiction of high school life?

Posted by: bucdaddy at July 28, 2008 3:52 PM

First of all, I meant CONSIGNED, not COSIGNED. Also, yes, Ms. Beaverhausen, that's exACTly what the premise of Baby Borrowers is.

I hate everyone involved.

Posted by: Mella at July 28, 2008 3:56 PM

This is also partly due to the "everybody's special" mentality that is currently in vogue among schools and parents...

Does anyone actually buy into this? I mean, besides the usual Herd of Stupid that is dumbfounded and bedazzled by damn near anything?

Even if this grand self-esteem program exists, it sure as hell doesn't work. Fifteen seconds of junior high school reality can remind anyone how much they suck and what level of the food chain they're at.

Posted by: twig at July 28, 2008 4:37 PM

This is also partly due to the "everybody's special" mentality that is currently in vogue among schools and parents...

Does anyone actually buy into this? I mean, besides the usual Herd of Stupid that is dumbfounded and bedazzled by damn near anything?

Even if this grand self-esteem program exists, it sure as hell doesn't work. Fifteen seconds of junior high school reality can remind anyone how much they suck and what level of the food chain they're at.

Posted by: twig at July 28, 2008 4:37 PM

Amen, Mella. I have so many WTF moments associated with pop culture nowadays that I suspect "quizzical" is my default expression.

I wind up being subjected to such fare as "Baby Borrowers" as a form of occupational hazard, interestingly enough. My significant other hosts a morning radio show out here in the cornfields (just typing those words planted "Baba O'Riley" in my head!), and part of her charter is to "be topical" -- so she winds up watching tripe like this under the guise of research (and I'm the supportive type so of course I keep her company).

Anyhow, I had exactly the same question you did: who the hell are these parents who agreed to let their infants be used as reality show props and why haven't their parenting licenses been revoked? I suspect I would have the same question concerning the parents of the teens in this movie (especially given Daniel's description of the aloof distance the parents were allowed to maintain, as with the mystery employment of the "comfortable but not wealthy" father).

I too am appalled by the whole make-me-a-reality-star phenomenon. Egocentricity issues aside, the civil libertarian in me cringes at the prospect of an entire generation so desperate for attention that their greatest fear is of not being on someone's -- anyone's -- camera...

Posted by: Grover at July 28, 2008 5:21 PM

this movie is unique and special. it me at sundance that this movie has a lot to offer the free world. we have to subject ourselves to fantasy and/or un-real life of the hills and laguna beach and these kids are very real. i laughed a ton and cried twice which is much more than most would expect me to. this movie really is something special and i really hope more of you get out of the cycle of celeb-reality and other lame tv shows and go see this movie. you will not regret it.

Posted by: got it wrong at July 28, 2008 5:57 PM

Why in the behind-the-bleacher-humping hell would I sit through this?

As a teacher, I avoid my students' hormone-induced drama like Rainbow Killer avoids keeping that big stupid yapper of hers shut. Nothing raises my hackles more than teachers who enter the profession in an attempt to relive their glory days (or who hope that they can FINALLY be "popular"). These teachers thrive on the students' drama and gossip. They would rather be liked than respected. They compromise their integrity in an effort to be "cool" in the eyes of their students. Whenever you see a teacher on the news who has had an affair with a student, you can rest assured that it's one of these teachers.

Now, I'm not saying that I don't care about my students. I probably get too involved in their lives sometimes. I've bought kids everything from school supplies to prom dresses. I've taken kids for STD tests (and before you start in on me, it's not because I thought I gave them one). I've helped get a teen removed from her home when I found out her dad was raping her. I've had students "practice" with me before telling parents they're gay. I'm that teacher that burns out because I love my kids too much. I mother them more than I should, mostly because so many have mothers who are absent. But I don't make it my business to know who's dating or who's cheating or who's hooking up. I don't take sides in arguments between friends (I swear to you, there are teachers who do). I'm there to be a teacher and mentor. And sometimes, I'm there to be an adult who loves them and is honest and blunt with them.

I do feel sorry for the geeky kid who gets rejected when he asks for a date or for the girl who realized that her "BFF" probably won't be around forever. These moments are painful to their young hearts. But I've seen much worse. Working in the inner city, I've seen the real problems many teens are facing. One year, out of a class of 30, there were 10 kids who had lost either one or both parents. Another 10 lived with a single parent or another guardian. Many of these kids grew up in abject poverty. They had experienced and been witness to acts of violence that most of us only see on the news. These kids were facing very adult problems with children's minds. People talk about having to grow up fast but that's not true. You can't fast-forward human development. You just experience enough that you become numb to it and it just seems you deal with it. Many of these kids were born into drugs, while others discovered it on their own.

This is why I hate shit like "The Hills" or any of the other teen "reality" shows. They aren't reality. Not even close. I've seen reality in the eyes of the kids who fill the seats of my classroom, and it scares the shit out of me.

Posted by: superEdna at July 28, 2008 7:45 PM

Um, I just realized that sort of turned into a rant. Apologies.

Posted by: superEdna at July 28, 2008 7:45 PM

Great review Dan. I don't know if you know, but Warsaw Community High School was my high school. I have yet to see the film, sadly, but can agree with you from the scenes I have caught. Though much of high school is drama, the kind we only know is drama when we mature, it seems to be a representational piece rather than a presentational film. This is just a testament to the feaux lives many people growing up on media have come to live. I myself found Los Angeles to be an odd culture shock because everyone in it seemed fake in some way, though they were "acting" pompous about not being as fake as others. This film really hit home with the scary thought that fake is just as fake in Warsaw, Indiana, as it is anywhere else. It is not a geography thing. It seems to be a generational thing. Thanks again for the review. If you'd like some more insight into Warsaw, give me a hollar!

Posted by: Andrew Gilbert at July 28, 2008 10:39 PM

Great review Dan. I don't know if you know, but Warsaw Community High School was my high school. I have yet to see the film, sadly, but can agree with you from the scenes I have caught. Though much of high school is drama, the kind we only know is drama when we mature, it seems to be a representational piece rather than a presentational film. This is just a testament to the feaux lives many people growing up on media have come to live. I myself found Los Angeles to be an odd culture shock because everyone in it seemed fake in some way, though they were "acting" pompous about not being as fake as others. This film really hit home with the scary thought that fake is just as fake in Warsaw, Indiana, as it is anywhere else. It is not a geography thing. It seems to be a generational thing. Thanks again for the review. If you'd like some more insight into Warsaw, give me a hollar!

Posted by: Andrew Gilbert at July 28, 2008 10:43 PM

Another Hoosier I see ...

I'm from South Bend, but I was briefly involved with (and still good friends with) a former student at Warsaw. He was good friends with the "band geek" and was present throughout the filming. He's been insanely excited about the release (can't blame him really), but what interests me is that I rarely if ever heard him mention the filming during the actual filming. It was our senior year at the time, and the bulk of our close interaction happened during this time period, and he never talked about how cameras were following his friend around school all day. I wonder if this reflects negatively on the process (the kids all take being observed and presented to the masses for granted) or positively (they were not affected by the cameras, or acting, just going about their lives). At any rate, I'm disappointed to hear it wasn't well done. I've promised to see it, but it sounds like just another piece of "reality" that will make me more depressed about the constant posing and posturing we're surrounded by these days.

By the way, superEdna, my friend at Warsaw had quite a rough background himself, as I'm sure many other Warsaw kids have. It's a shame the director couldn't have looked for a slightly more compelling list of subjects - maybe some people with more serious problems than a high school heartbreak and some back-stabbing drama.

Posted by: Claire at July 29, 2008 4:01 AM

So, let's get down to brass tacks:

- Who gets pregnant?

- Who gets the clap/other STD of the week?

- Who "surprise gays" us? (Not my term, Colbert's)

- Who's the "Juno"? (That's my term for the annoying outsider who's all about being the outsider for entertainment's sake.)

Oh...this is a documentary? Shit, you could have fooled me. I thought this was some sort of Lifetime dreck being foisted upon us again. Well...


...does any of that still happen?

Posted by: Mike R. at July 29, 2008 11:07 AM

AS IF I would wanna see these fucking prostitots
complain about there last abortion or some shallow closet homoerotic jock pick on the class retard...... what a fucking waste of film....

Posted by: MrShit at July 29, 2008 1:46 PM

When are people going to learn that beautifully-done fiction is the best way to represent reality?

Posted by: samantha t at July 29, 2008 1:58 PM

I think I'll have to see it to decide if all kids are lost to the reality/fame program (like I fear). Mind you, that just may be my age speaking, where I'm sure there's far less soul exponentially in the human genome than there was in my day.

Now that I'm in my mid-thirties I think I've recognized that my whole teenage experience was about 'trying it on for size' and hoping people would notice. I was a massive social failure, by the way, despite being skilled in the arts of child actor. No exaggeration. Jan Brady.

So...Maybe we're accusing these kids of a longing to sell their souls, when all they want is to project the kind of image that will ensure fun, love and security? And it's not like they've had much time to form a quality opinion as to what that might look like. I'm not so sure how many of us have it sorted out even now, anyways.

Posted by: replica at July 30, 2008 1:40 AM

Thank god others are having the same reaction I did. This movie was about as honest as an episode of The Hills, and I walked out about fifteen minutes before it ended in disgust. There are so many staged, enhanced and manipulated moments I found it impossible to connect with.

The film would have been better if the filmmaker had simply wrote the script she wanted and cast real actors, instead of exploiting real kids in desperate need of attention.

AVOID AT ALL COSTS!

Posted by: Drew at July 30, 2008 12:05 PM

shoot, i was a disappointed in this movie. it felt like a documentary a first year film student would have made. in some ways high school IS so cliche and melodramatic (i read my journals from those years and i can't believe i really said things like "i will never love again" when i was fifteen.) so i'm sure it can be a temptation to give into that but...how about when Colin says his dad was really the one who loved basketball-is there something else he loves and wishes he could have done? Hannah drinks and smokes alone, doesn't have present parents and takes antidepressants but her sadness is blamed on a break-up? Seriously why did Megan do that to poor Ericka? It just felt riddled with stereotypes which either means we are all just way less complicated then we think OR this was a crappy documentary.

one shining spot was-the kids all seemed pretty real and sincere which was nice. there was no "Hills" like character except for megan's really annoying little blond friend who i wanted to tell to shut her stupid little ignorant mouth every time she was talking or breathing through it.

Posted by: kc at August 5, 2008 9:58 AM





Video ads popping up after each page view? Try clearing your browser's cookies.