web
counter
 

War on War

By Drew Morton | Posted Under DVD Reviews | Comments (17)



pathsofglory.jpg

First off, a word of welcome: this is the first entry in Pajiba’s DVD Review section, a new section for which I was recently named editor by our esteemed editor and chief, Dustin Rowles. After nearly a decade of writing about film on the web, it feels like a homecoming to be doing DVD reviews once again (I cut my teeth on them initially and, over the years, I’ve learned a hell of a lot about the craft—-those early reviews are embarrassing in retrospect). In any case, the purpose of this section serves two functions. In some cases, as in this review, we’ll (yes, we, there will be a special guest writer who is joining the ranks) be reviewing movies with a fresh perspective while paying particular attention to AV quality and supplemental features. In other cases, when a film has already been reviewed for the site, we’ll simply be focusing on the latter characteristics for the sake of continuity.

A few other disclaimers. Now, there are a lot of DVD and Blu-Ray releases on a week to week basis, and we’re probably only going to get to few on a monthly basis. Don’t be discouraged initially. On the technological side of things, I am using a Plasma HDTV, Playstation 3 Blu-Ray player, and a 5.1 home theater in a box. To some technophiles, the set up makes all the difference and since I’m reviewing some Blu-Ray titles, my home viewing experiences may be slightly different than your own. I encourage you to discuss such differences in the comment sections, if you’re feeling gearheadish. Now, without further ado, welcome to our first review.

Paths of Glory: Criterion Collection [Blu-Ray]

The Film
Paths of Glory (1957) is Stanley Kubrick’s second war film, after his debut Fear and Desire (1953) which the director subsequently disowned. His forth feature, Paths of Glory is often considered Kubrick’s first masterpiece, one of the greatest anti-war films ever made (although some scholars and critics have argued if it can be classified as such). It nurtures the seeds of the themes he would further explore in Dr. Strangelove Or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Bomb (1964) and Full Metal Jacket (1987), chiefly the dehumanization of the soldier at the hands of the military. The film begins in the midst of the trench warfare of World War I. French General Broulard (Adolphe Menjou) advises his subordinate officer General Mireau (George Macready) that he will be tasked with the take over of a German-held position known as the “Anthill.” It is a small, relatively insignificant target which will result in the death of many men and Mireau advises against it. When Broulard mentions the possibility that Mireau will be promoted, he accepts the mission and assigns Colonel Dax (Kirk Douglas) to take the target.

Dax, like Mireau, realizes that the task at hand is an impossible one but is forced to obey orders. When the attack commences, it is a disaster. Many men are killed, which results in the other half of the men not leaving the trenches. When Mireau looks upon the action, he becomes furious and requests that the French artillery begins firing at its own men. When his request is denied and the mission becomes a complete SNAFU, Mireau demands that three men be tried for insubordination with death being the penalty. Broulard and Dax reluctantly agree, on the grounds that Dax can serve as the chosen men’s defensive council.

When the three men (Timothy Carey, Ralph Meeker, and Joseph Turkel) are tried and convicted, Dax is destroyed and yet unable to get his men off the hook. These are men who have demonstrated bravery in the past and, when faced with an absurd suicide mission, reacted in a rational fashion by not leaving the trenches. Yet, as in the case in Kubrick’s view of the military, rational thinking means relatively little and the absurdity of the situation is capitalized upon. Like Strangelove, death is not described by the military as being tied to an individual, but to a number, a percentage. The three men chosen were not more cowardly than their colleagues. They were chosen either at random or due to clashes with other superior officers, making their trial feel farcical.

While Kubrick criticizes the military (especially the French, who banned the film for a number of years), he humanizes the condemned men. We watch as Meeker’s soldier tries to shift his world-view to accept God, as Carey’s socially inept soldier crumbles on the long walk to the firing squad, and as Turkel’s pessimist reacts to the both of them. As Meeker states in one scene, while looking down at a cockroach, “See that cockroach? Tomorrow morning, we’ll be dead and it’ll be alive. It’ll have more contact with my wife and child than I will. I’ll be nothing, and it’ll be alive.” Kubrick personalizes the deaths, which turns them into something more than a statistic. It is a heartbreaking, frightening film and one of the best of Kubrick’s career.

The one criticism I found upon re-watching Paths of Glory after many years is the spectrum of acting styles on display here. Meeker, Turkel, Carey, and especially, Douglas, play the French soldiers as being profoundly American. There is no hint of accent in their delivery and their performances seem naturalistic. On the other hand, George Macready gives his lines a relish and the hint of a European accent. I’m not sure how I feel about Kubrick’s choice here. On one hand, the clash is distracting, particularly in the scenes he shares with Douglas. On the other hand, perhaps the point is that Macready’s character is out of touch with this world and the performance is a way of making that literal.

The AV Quality
I’m normally on the fence when it comes to upgrading my previously owned titles. Last week was a bit tempting, considering the release of the Alien, Back to the Future, and Apocalypse Now sets on Blu-Ray. I skipped the others and went for Paths of Glory, mainly because the previous MGM disc was a $10 title and made for a low-cost upgrade and because Criterion really knows how give consumers a great home theater experience. The Criterion Blu-Ray features a new transfer supervised by Kubrick’s assistant, Leon Vitali, which features the film’s original aspect ratio (1.66:1 compared with MGM’s DVD treatment of 1.33:1). For a fifty year old, black and white, widescreen film, Criterion has found a way to balance the grains and contrasts of the film going experience with the clarity of Blu-Ray technology. The audio track (uncompressed mono) may not be home theater demo quality, but the different dynamics of the war sequences and the court room scenes hold up well.

The Supplemental Features
Criterion, a DVD company known for its extensive supplemental packages (a three-disc collection for Brazil!) disappointed me a bit with the features on Paths of Glory. First off, we’re given a commentary track with critic Gary Giddins. Giddins is far from a poor scholar, but given James Naremore’s extensive work on Kubrick (he supples an essay for the package) and his stellar DVD commentary track record (contributing to both Criterion’s Mr. Arkadin and Universal’s Touch of Evil, I found Giddins a less than ideal choice. The bulk of the other supplemental features are video interviews ranging from a 1979 television interview with Kirk Douglas (who briefly discusses the film in the context of his career), a new interview with Kubrick collaborators James B. Harris, Christiane Kubrick, and Jan Harlan, and an excerpt from a radio interview with Kubrick himself. I’m not sure how much interview material of Kubrick is still around, but the radio interview excerpt is terribly brief (slightly over 2 minutes) and had me wishing for more. Perhaps re-prints from the Stanley Kubrick Interviews book? The Paths of Glory segment from Stanley Kubrick: A Life in Pictures (2001)? Criterion’s treatment is far from terrible and my criticisms may seem unfair and idealistic, but after Warner Brothers stepped up to the challenge with their remastered Kubrick set in 2008, I was expecting the bar to be raised. Instead, it stays at the same moderately-high level of quality.

Drew Morton is a Ph.D. student in Cinema and Media Studies at the University of California-Los Angeles. His criticism and articles have previously appeared in the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, the UWM Post, Flow, Mediascape, The Playlist, and Senses of Cinema. He is the 2008 and 2010 recipient of the Otis Ferguson Award for Critical Writing in Film Studies.









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



Pajiba Love 05/11/2010 | YES. More Of This. | GhettoPhysics Review | That's The Name of the Game









Comments

Speaking as someone who also has a Playstation 3 and a Plasma HDTV, I can safely say that the 1:66 aspect ratio is a pain in the ass.

Posted by: Todd at November 5, 2010 3:15 PM

That should be 1.66:1, obviously. Gak!

Posted by: Todd at November 5, 2010 3:16 PM

Mr. Julien bought a new BluRay player and an exquisite TV for which I do not know the technical specs, so I think these reviews will come in very handy.

Thanks Drew.

Posted by: Mrs. Julien at November 5, 2010 3:19 PM

The film was never banned in France, it was just never released. The French government pressured the production company, so it was never shown in its entirety in France until the '70s.

French anger over the film gets a big, fat 'Too damned bad' from me, seeing as how it's a true story and all--oh wait, in real life it was four soldiers who were executed on bogus mutiny charges. Here's where it gets really classy: The families of the deceased sued and the executions were ruled as unfair, so as compensation, two of the families received one franc each, and the others received nothing. Shameful.

I love this movie, and I love Blackadder.

Posted by: Jo 'Mama' Besser at November 5, 2010 5:34 PM

Oooh sounds like a great new feature. Looking forward to more!

Posted by: figgy at November 5, 2010 6:09 PM

I see you, Wilco reference. I seeeeeeeee you.

Posted by: kitkat at November 6, 2010 6:52 AM

Thanks Drew for starting a new section. Blu Ray is a tech that is light years ahead of DVD in terms of picture quality.
It's a pity Criterion didn't remove all the random spots from the film though. It's was great watch nevertheless.

Posted by: smithee at November 6, 2010 1:05 PM

And days like this is why I love You, Jo Mama.

Posted by: Jackseppelin at November 6, 2010 6:13 PM

You're going to stuckle me for the 'are," aren't you?

Posted by: Jackseppelin at November 6, 2010 6:16 PM

Shit. Stickle. Just woke up from a nap.

Posted by: Jackseppelin at November 6, 2010 6:17 PM

Wait, what? Everyone's using Blu-Ray now? Goddamn HD-DVD player!

Great section. "Pretentious wanker" speak and all.

Posted by: Uda at November 7, 2010 7:21 AM

Can you name Kubrick's first three movies off the top of your head?

I can't. But I think DM might feel off to you because he is a film student.

And don't you worry. He's well appreciated.

You know it's also pretension to say you're above everything.

Particularly when you stand for nothing.

Offering no alternative, no ideal to aspire to, pretend or not.

Writing comments in enjambments, lacking any

Self-effacing awareness or complimentary acuity?

Go away, you fruit flies, you hack in my lungs.

And reruns of Prison Break Season 1 are on.

Posted by: Jackseppelin at November 7, 2010 10:19 AM

Did I miss something in the comments?

Posted by: Uda at November 8, 2010 1:12 AM

Actually, I'm not even going to wait...

Jackseppelin,
I'm assuming that was directed at me since the comment previous to my own was removed. Out of context, I have to admit I look like a douchebag. Whoever it was had said that Drew wrote like a pretentious wanker, and I had very intentionally written my comment in a disjointed manner in response. Next time I'll remember to quote them directly.

I actually really appreciate Drew's writing. You might even say I look forward to his reviews the most because of his film studies background. I often learn something new about the film or his various references will lead me to other films I haven't yet seen. I've also recently upgraded my viewing technology, so I greatly appreciate that we'll get a place to discuss the advantages of a particular version of the reviewed film.

I apologize if I was the one who created any confusion.

Posted by: Uda at November 8, 2010 1:48 AM

Naw, Uda. I don't think I can have a problem with someone who names herself after a Party Down character. And I rarely miss irony or subtext or what not, though there are some bullshit aficionados like I've never seen collected in this bunch. For the most part, I like ya'll.

It was just "supafly" whose comment was somehow removed that makes me look like a dick.

Seriously, if I wasn't parasocially in love with Kristen Bell, I might never have bothered.

Peace, sister comrade. I can be prickly, but not from light touches such as the first comment. I just remember when we had stalwart defenders who'd slay the trolls despite their grandest illusions--usually before I could even read a thread. Hell, I even remember one time where I was stymied by who.... I can't remember. But I had gotten after Pink for something and though she took it gracefully, peach that she was, some dude laid me out. Maybe Jeremy. Or calling Pink Hulk on one of his eccentric tastes and him yelling at me to Get off his lawn. Or the recent cannonade of Why me, God, Why Us from Jo Mama and Zombiescientist. But i recall this mostly as 'getting to know you,' not because I'm capable to ferry grudges across virtual lines.

Posted by: Jackseppelin at November 8, 2010 8:23 AM

Good to know I'm just being paranoid. I just wasn't sure when the comment was taken down.

Mmmm, Kristen Bell...

Posted by: Uda at November 8, 2010 8:39 AM

I’m shocked, I need to say. Really seldom do I go through a blog that’s both educative and interesting, and without a doubt, you might have hit the nail on the head. Your current concept is definitely outstanding; the thing is whatever insufficient people are talking intelligently about. I will be happy that found it within my try to find something relating to this.

Posted by: Mac nick at January 23, 2011 12:05 PM