web
counter
 

Colt Cocks, Elephant Ejaculate, Stillborns, and Sausages

By Drew Morton | Posted Under DVD Reviews | Comments (20)



freddy01.jpg

The Film
Tom Green’s studio directorial debut, the infamous Freddy Got Fingered (2001) is a film I’ve wanted to redeem even since I began writing for Pajiba in 2009. I acknowledge that the task ahead of me is Sisyphean, as the film boasts an 11% approval rating on Rotten Tomatoes (7% if limited to “Top Critics”). Yet, the film does have its share of eloquent defenders, most notably A.O. Scott’s thoughtful analysis in The New York Times and Nathan Rabin’s dissection for The AV Club’s series, “My Year of Flops.” I’ve been ambivalent to write this piece because of intimidation. Not an intimidation of the film or my own affection towards it (and whatever wild eyed, gasps of disbelief it may produce) but because, quite simply, Scott and Rabin are far greater writers than I and I felt that my contribution would merely be the equivalent of whipping a dead horse. Well, to be fair to the film, restraint is not a quality it embodies or encourages. After all, we’re talking about an 89 minute Dada exercise that ruthlessly tracks down our cultural taboos, brings them to the forefront, and then demolishes them through set piece, freak outs.

Given this objective, it is of no surprise that the plot of the film is minimal. Gord Brody (Tom Green) is a 28 year old skateboarder, wannabe cartoonist (“I’m gonna be like Charles Schulz!”), and live at home slacker. When he isn’t working on his half-pipe with best friend Darren (Harland Williams), he’s wearing scuba gear in the shower, looking for lost treasure (“That’s soap on a rope!”) or finding his inner muse by drawing, eating, and playing music…at the same time. At the beginning of the film, Gord decides to finally leave the nest and bring dreams of becoming an animator to fruition by fleeing to Hollywood and accepting work in a cheese sandwich factory. One day, under subterfuge, Gord disguises himself as an English Bobby, bearing the news that the wife of a animation studio executive (Anthony Michael Hall) has been killed. He quickly removes the outfit and plunks his drawings of X-Ray Cat into the man’s hands. Yet, the drawings (and one can assume the reaction to Green’s script for the film) are nonsensical, which prompts the exec to give Gord a piece of advice: “Quit the shitty cheese job….You have to get inside the animals!”

Fortunately for us, Gord takes the exec’s advice literally. He quits his job at the Hollywood Cheese Sandwich Factory and begins his voyage back to his parents’ basement. Along the way, he lecherously devours a deli sandwich while watching an insemination at a stud farm. Shortly thereafter, he encounters a fallen deer on a tree-lined interstate. Hopping out of his Chrysler Lebaron (a going away present from his parents, complete with a license plate reading “#1 Son”), Gord disembowels the animal and wears its body, Tautaun style, before getting hit by a speeding semi. When he finally arrives home (yes, he survives getting plastered by an 18 wheeler), he finds that his parents, Jim (Rip Torn) and Julie (Julie Hagerty), are far from dazzled.

The domestic breaking point comes after a lengthy digression that begins when Darren suffers a broken leg while skating the half-pipe with Gord. Gord goes to visit his fallen friend in the hospital, only to meet the charming Betty (Marisa Coughlan), a wheelchair bound doctor. After a sequence in which Gord delivers a still-born baby, bites through the umbilical chord, and brings the fetus back to life through the magic of swinging it around by said chord, Gord and Betty become an item. Gord discovers that his girlfriend is only able to sexually climax when caned with a bamboo rod on her numbed limbs. One evening, the couple actually decides to go out on a date to a fancy restaurant. Unfortunately for Gord, his parents are also in attendance and an awkward confrontation ensues. Gord gets his revenge when he testifies to his family therapist that his father, who belittles Gord at every turn for his artistic ambitions, fingers his “little” (25 year old) brother, Freddy (Eddie Kaye Thomas).

From that point on, the film becomes a showdown between Green’s Gord and Torn’s Jim, a domestic nightmare founded on mutual resentment and philosophical differences towards life. Gord embodies the dreamer who, despite being an adult in a temporal sense, holds out on other career options in order to fulfill his ambitions of becoming an animator. Jim, who would rather wipe his ass with Gord’s drawings than pay them any attention, views the career option as being unrealistic and simply an excuse for Gord to stage insane set pieces in his domain, such as the one seen in this clip.

Freddy Got Fingered, as you can perhaps begin to grasp by my feeble re-telling, is a rather schizophrenic film. On one hand, these moments, like the “Daddy, Would You Like Some Sausages?” number, exist purely to scratch an itch of watching a man take a running leaping over the line of acceptable behavior into the red zone of depravity. Yet, where Green’s film is underestimated is that this is not their sole raison d’ĂȘtre. The conflict of ideas between Gord and Jim is very real (aided by Torn’s standout performance) and, I would assume, holds autobiographical value for Green. While Gord may be a wild-eyed idealist, he is, like Green, simply a talent in need of focus. This is the quality of Fingered that was and, for the most part, still is overlooked by critics and general viewers of the film. Freddy Got Fingered is a celluloid paradox: a deliberately artless film about the nature of art.

In retrospect, I cannot help but lament the implosion of Tom Green’s career. Coming off his successful MTV series “The Tom Green Show” (2000), Green temporarily broke through to the mainstream with supporting roles in Road Trip (2000) and Charlie’s Angels (2000). Inspired by the success for the show and his previous film offerings, Regency gave Green a budget of $15 million to write, direct, and star in Freddy. Yet, as you can probably tell, the abundance of taste-offensive humor (including a scene in which Torn is covered in the ejaculate of an elephant), scathing reviews, and Raspberry nominations brought the box office take of Fingered barely over its production budget. When the film tanked, Green, who had recently fought off cancer, returned to MTV with “The New Tom Green Show” (2002). Yet, the cultural window of opportunity had closed on him and the poorly rated show was cancelled a few months after premiering. In the end however, we still have Fingered, a prime specimen of cinematic oddity and one that, despite what might seem better judgement, deserves our astonishment.

The AV Quality
The presentation of the film, only available on a 2001 issued DVD, is surprisingly strong. The 1.85 widescreen transfer still holds up when viewed on an HD set while the 5.1 Dolby Surround track gets the job done.

The Supplemental Features
The features included on Freddy are pretty stunning. First off, we have a pair of commentary tracks, the first, featuring a shockingly restrained Green, runs the length of the film and provides some insights into his experiences with the production. The second track features supporting cast members but is, unfortunately, only provided for a handful of scenes. Also included are deleted scenes, a short making of documentary and, one of my favorites, a three-minute PG rated version of the film. In retrospect, I’m hard-pressed to find any glaring flaws in the supplements. However, I’d love to have heard a track by A.O. Scott, who was the film’s sole defender at the time. If Fox ever produces a Blu-Ray, I’d love to hear a Scott, Rabin, and Green round-table.

Drew Morton is a Ph.D. student in Cinema and Media Studies at the University of California-Los Angeles. His criticism and articles have previously appeared in the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, the UWM Post, Animation: An Interdisciplinary Journal, Flow, Mediascape, The Playlist, Senses of Cinema, and Studies in Comics. He is the 2008 and 2010 recipient of the Otis Ferguson Award for Critical Writing in Film Studies.









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



You Have $10 and 2 Hours. You Can Only Watch One Movie. Which of These Would You Watch Based Only on the Still Image? | The 12 Most Boneheaded Unannounced* Movie Projects Currently in Development | "Animal Kingdom" and "About Last Night" Remakes?









Comments

i'm pretty disappointed with this post. i was looking forward to a defense of one of the most indefensible films ever...instead what i got was a drawn out summary of the film and a lamenting over the demise of green's career.

in the middle you state an interesting thesis, "fingered is a celluloid paradox: a deliberately artless film about the nature of art." i was hoping a defense of your thesis statement would be the focus of the post; instead you spent the whole time beating around the bush.

Posted by: RomeoCranberry at January 18, 2011 12:03 PM

Romeo,

First off, thanks for writing. Sorry you were disappointed with the post. I had a difficult line to walk in writing it. First off, it's a review and a redemptive one at that, so I wanted to describe it for those who had not yet been to the Tom Green party. The format of the review makes elongated arguments about a thesis such as mine rather difficult. When I've written such pieces in the past, they seem to alienate the readership and come across to non-viewers of the film as inaccessible.

Thus, I tried to compromise the best of both approaches here and I guess I came up a bit short when it came to your expectations. I do not write this out of being angry or displeased that someone called me out in the comments, just to thank you for reading and I appreciate your constructive criticism.

Posted by: Drew Morton at January 18, 2011 12:20 PM

Drew, do you remember the episode of "Undeclared" where Martin Starr's (more or less reprising Bill Haverchuck from "Freaks and Geeks") idea of seducing a girl consisted of mounting an impassioned defense of Freddy Got Fingered? It.....didn't work.

Posted by: sansho1 at January 18, 2011 12:27 PM

Well, it worked on my wife. ;)

Posted by: Drew Morton at January 18, 2011 12:27 PM

Well then rock on, Haverchuck!

Posted by: sansho1 at January 18, 2011 12:38 PM

hey drew, thanks for the response. i guess i'm someone who has always enjoyed your academic analyses of films. but i understand you gotta walk a tight rope in trying to please everyone.

but in the future, when you respond to a dickish post like mine, could you try and get a little angry? cuz now i just feel like an asshole.

Posted by: RomeoCranberry at January 18, 2011 12:41 PM

Romeo,

You can either eat that damned roast beef or you can go to bed.

Posted by: Drew Morton at January 18, 2011 12:50 PM

I saw this film in the theaters and found it amusing. I'm a big fan of absurdist humor, of which I consider this an example--albeit, extreme.

I chucked at Drew's comments response. I immediately think of this:

It's like in the olden days, in the... days of France, when men would slap each other with their gloves... say, y'know... "D'Artagnan!"... y'know, "how dare you talk to me like that, you!," and... smack 'em!

Posted by: gunnertec at January 18, 2011 12:54 PM

I didn't really mind the movie as it had it's moments. However, as I was a fan of Green's before he got to the dizzying heights of MTV fame, I may have a better understanding of his specialness. I do lament that he will never again reach the heights of stardom that he did as a member of Organized Rhyme.

Posted by: admin at January 18, 2011 1:15 PM

"my contribution would merely be the equivalent of whipping a dead tumescent horse."
There. Fixed.

Posted by: Odnon. at January 18, 2011 1:24 PM

Check the OR, ya like it so far?
Check the OR, ya love the OR!

Posted by: Brenton at January 18, 2011 1:42 PM

Umbilical chord? So you can strum them thangs now? I wonder what it sounds like... I suspect it's sorta twangy.

Thanks for that though, I never saw Freddy Got Fingered, never had the slightest clue what the hell it was about. All I remember are the trailers featuring "Daddy would you like some sausage? Daddy would you like some sau-sa-GES,"

Posted by: Rest In Peace at January 18, 2011 2:58 PM

I saw this film twice and cinema and have also defended it over the years. The film is best seen as some kind of meta joke, ie it's not so much the jokes within the film that are funny, it's that the film itself got made and a worldwide cinema release. It's gross out surrealism, folks. I'd go so far to argue that Freddy Got Fingered is the cinematic soul mate of Bunuel and Dali's Un Chien Andalou. Watch them together and tell me those two films not tonally identical.

Posted by: smitty at January 18, 2011 5:52 PM

I enjoyed the review. Then again, I saw this movie when it came out in 2001 and the only thing I remembered was the sausage song. (At random times in my life will I recite it amidst company.) I don't see what the harrumphing is about; Drew did a decent job in bringing coherency to a movie that obviously didn't want it.

And now for my reaction to Drew being married: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=35Lt4bIXyrY

Posted by: duckandcover at January 18, 2011 11:54 PM

OK, I'm shooting for most long-winded commenter in 2011, so bear with me.

I've never seen Freddy Got Fingered. I remember, of course, the sausage song, and I find that... mildly amusing in a child-like way. However, I would never, ever, ever watch Freddy Got Fingered because I absolutely can't deal with gross-out humor, particularly bodily fluid humor (duh). Which some would say is weird, because I love horror movies. Which is toooootallllly different. Anyway. I'm getting to the point! Geez! Similarly, I would never, ever, ever watch a Jackass movie.

So I found this review very interesting, because obviously both movies are about "leaping over the line of acceptable behavior into the red zone of depravity". But Freddy has the added dimension of being fictional, and creating two strong characters (father and son) who play off each other in a relatable (to some) way, albeit without any coherent plot. Even without watching the movie, I can totally imagine how you see that aspect in the middle of the hot mess and find affection for the movie.

But I still don't see why anyone would have affection for Jackass.

Hmm, I thought I had more of a point, but I guess I don't. I just wanted to say that I found this interesting, even though I will still never watch Freddy Got Fingered.

Posted by: MM at January 19, 2011 2:22 AM

Love tom green and frequently go to his website... (But too cheap to join it). tom still has it..i expect some sort of comeback. thanks for the review... Had forgotten about it & will look for it

Posted by: Will at January 19, 2011 3:28 AM

I was never a fan of Tom Green and I hated every bit of this movie.

After this post?

I feel exactly the same.
~~~

Posted by: Meander at January 19, 2011 10:13 AM

Good article!

We need people like Tom to keep us sane. He pushes boundaries and the film, albeit not for everyone, was refreshingly different. And hilarious.

Hoping to see the man himself on his live tour.

Posted by: Filipino Dan at January 19, 2011 11:55 AM

I just watched the well done Simpsons porno parody ever. It's totally live action and Marge is mad hot, but i seriously nearly crapped my pants once i saw Flanders. Its like they yanked him directly out of the cartoon and made him real...

Posted by: Steph Merret at January 20, 2011 4:57 AM

Found your site today through Yahoo. Great blog you've got, bookmarked.

Posted by: Big Button Mobile Phone at January 21, 2011 2:57 PM