web
counter
 

Was 2010 a Down Year for Movies?

By Dustin Rowles | Posted Under Comment Diversions | Comments (52)



dark_knight_18.jpg

Now that we’ve posted our Best Films of 2010, individual and group, and many of you have had your say, I now put the question to all of you: Was 2010 a down year for movies?

On first blush, to me it felt like a good year, one that may not have had many great films, but one that at least had a lot of pretty good ones. Dan’s been suggesting for a while now, however, that it’s been a pretty mediocre year for movies overall (which probably demonstrates why he had two movies — Black Swan and The Town — in his top ten list that he didn’t review that favorably). I thought Dan was just being curmudgeonly until I actually looked back at our top ten movies from previous years. Relative to those other years, I’d have to agree: It’s been a down year.

Maybe that’s the point: You need more than a year to really make an assessment. Looking back at previous years, there are certainly some that have aged better (Children of Men, for instance), while some don’t really feel like they should belong on a top ten list (like Babel or even Slumdog Millionaire, which has lost of a lot of its luster). Judging this year’s crop against the previous five, I’d probably place 2010 in fourth place, ahead of only 2008, which gave us one of the two or three best movies during the time period (The Dark Knight), but nine other movies that feel a little slight in retrospect.

So, I put the question to you — in light of the top tens from previous years, how does 2010 stack up? There’s even a poll below the list, where you can choose your favorite year of the last five. I’m honestly curious which you think was the best (I’d probably go with 2007, a year where only The Social Network from this year would even break the top ten). And no: You don’t have to base that decision on our top 10 list; if you thought Scott Pilgrim or Inception belonged on this year’s Top 10, and you feel those two entries would make it the best year, by all means, vote accordingly.

Best Films of 2006*

10. Volver

9. The Queen

8. United 93

7. Babel

6. Little Children

5. Brick

4. Pan’s Labyrinth

3. Half-Nelson

2. The Departed

1. Children of Men

Best Films of 2007**

10. Waitress

9. The Bourne Ultimatum

8. Zodiac

7. The Assassination of Jesse James by the Coward Robert Ford

6. Knocked Up

5. Ratatouille

4. Lars and the Real Girl

3. Juno

2. There Will Be Blood

1. No Country for Old Men


Best Films of 2008

10. Doubt

9. The Wrestler

8. Frost/Nixon

7. Wall-E

6. The Visitor

5. Tell No One

4. Iron Man

3. Rachel Getting Married

2. Slumdog Millionaire

1. The Dark Knight


Best Films of 2009

10. Inglourious Basterds

9. Star Trek

8. Fantastic Mr. Fox

7. Adventureland

6. (500) Days of Summer

5. District 9

4. Away We Go

3. Up

2. Up in the Air

1. The Hurt Locker


Best Films of 2010

10. The Ghost Writer

9. Four Lions

8. True Grit

7. Exit Through the Gift Shop

6. Blue Valentine

5. The Town

4. The Fighter

3. Black Swan

2. MicMacs

1. The Social Network



* We didn’t rank them in 2006; I took the liberty to rank them based on how I’d rank them now.

** We did a roundtable instead of a top 10 in 2007, but reading between the lines, I named ten and ranked them, again, how I’d rank them now









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



Fur Pillow Are Hard To Actually Sleep On | Pajiba Love | The Top Ten Films of 2009 | For the Procastionators, the Shut-Ins, and Me









Comments

This is tough, because 2007 has two of the movies that I really, really love, but 2006 has more movies that I'd watch over and over again. 2008 was the weak link in this list, though I'd have to exclude 2010 because I haven't seen a lot of the movies yet. I plan to, I just don't get to the "good" theater much, and when I do, I'm usually outvoted on what movie to see.

Posted by: Wednesday at January 5, 2011 2:14 PM

2009 has an impressive line up: Star Trek (don’t kill me BSlim!), Fantastic Mr. Fox, (500) Days of Summer, District 9, Away We Go, Up and Up In The Air?

2007 is the runner up.

Posted by: Scully at January 5, 2011 2:14 PM

I gotta go with 2009. That's a pretty spectacular line-up with a lot of variety. Sort of like my Stable of Fine Ladies.

Posted by: Kballs at January 5, 2011 2:19 PM

2007 was such a ridiculous year; Juno, No Country and There Will Be Blood are the best top three we will see for years and years, and the fact that they're the tip of the iceberg is amazing; but hey, why are we complaining about how hard it is to pick which of the last 5 years was best? Cause for celebration, surely.

Posted by: scarecrowprophet at January 5, 2011 2:21 PM

I'm between 07 and 09 but my vote went to 09. That is just a damn fine list of movies, even if I wasn't that impressed by Adventureland or 500 Days of Summer. But Up in the Air, District 9,, Up, Away We Go, The Hurt Locker and (for me at least) Sunshine Cleaning and Zombieland more than make up for it.

Posted by: TylerDFC at January 5, 2011 2:22 PM

I think 2007's films are more in the "timeless" category; those that will hold up. Like, "Doubt" was a standout for me in 2008, but a lot of the others don't have as much staying power.

Posted by: Ian at January 5, 2011 2:22 PM

On second glance, 2007 and 2009 are separated by one simple fact:

Zombieland couldn't even crack the top 10 in 2009.

That's enough for me.

Posted by: Kballs at January 5, 2011 2:37 PM

I picked 2009, primarily because I thought most of those movies were excellent. I could take the entire list of 2009 and place it between the #2 and #3 spot of any other year and have a decent "super list".

Posted by: Lennon at January 5, 2011 2:40 PM

I'm a weirdo. I liked 2008 best. *shrugs* I have a lot of love for Wall-E, and Slumdog (still) and Dark Knight and Iron Man. Although in retrospect, maybe I should have gone with 2009. Damn.

Posted by: Lindsay at January 5, 2011 2:51 PM

2007. Even though it contains two movies that make me cringe but that is overshadowed by No Country, Blood, Ratatoulle, and Assasination. 2009 was close but more entertainment than wonderful films.

Posted by: admin at January 5, 2011 2:51 PM

The poll results surprise me a bit - I think 2008's underrated (maybe because I love Iron Man and really fucking love the Dark Knight) and 2007's substantially overrated. I'm with the slight majority for 2009, though - Up and Adventureland alone are good for propelling it near the top.

Posted by: Zack at January 5, 2011 2:51 PM

"I’m honestly curious which you think was the best (I’d probably go with 2007, a year where only The Social Network from this year would even break the top ten)..."


This right here is one fucked-up statement. You say you're into quality films?

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at January 5, 2011 3:01 PM

I still think Milk was the best film of 2008 with no hesitation in my mind, and definitely better than Slumdog. To not have it on that top 10 is disappointing.

Time has really changed my feelings about 2009, as far as the best film. Oscar time, I thought it was Up in the Air. Then I decided it was The Hurt Locker. But, with time and repeat viewings, I think it has to be Inglorious Basterds. The Hurt Locker is a great movie about war, and should definitely be in the conversation for the best films about war ever made.

But Inglorious Basterds, while at first I thought it was a war film, is really much more subversive and surprising; rather than make his statement about war, Tarantino made his statement about war movies. And in this sense, it's very bold, very provocative, and an absolutely thrilling achievement. The more I watch it, the more I think it should really be the final nail in the coffin of World War II films. At this point, it's all just propaganda. The Hurt Locker is a brilliant examination of modern war. Inglorious Basterds is the culmination, criticism, and finale of America's last great victorious battle.

Posted by: ChristianH at January 5, 2011 3:03 PM

Look, Christian, I liked Inglourious too, but it was fun because it was dumb. To take it as saying anything either 1. substantively interesting or 2. true about WWII or WWII films is overreaching, I think.

Put another we: we know that WWII films glorify the Allies. So if that's all IB is saying, then it's not 1. But if it goes further, and is saying "the movies glorify war, but, like, the Allies did super fucked up things too, so we should stop doing it, man" is too dip into shallow moral relativism. Boo to that.

Posted by: Zack at January 5, 2011 3:09 PM

Not that I agree with the entirety of that particular top ten, but without question the answer is 2007. It's not even close.

Posted by: DarthCorleone at January 5, 2011 3:11 PM

Any year that has Pans LAbryinth will work for me.

Posted by: ShevylikethecAr at January 5, 2011 3:12 PM

And, yes, what I've seen of 2010 so far isn't that great. 2008 was extremely weak too.

Posted by: DarthCorleone at January 5, 2011 3:13 PM

In the defense of Inglorious Basterds, which I have to admit gets better with subsequent viewings, you have to approach it with a certain mindset. I have come to appreciate it as an amped-up revenge fantasy from a Jewish point of view (I have no idea if Tarantino is Jewish or has some Jew in there), but that's what I think it is. It's not really a war movie, hell it's not even even historical except for using WW2 as a framing device for the story. By that I mean that he could have used any context where Jews are being persecuted throughout history and told the story. Could end up getting recognized as Tarantino's best work some day. I know I'm sold.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at January 5, 2011 3:22 PM

Zack I didn't find Inglorious to be dumb. That's not to say I'd vote for it as Film of the Year but I don't think I'd insult anyone for loving it. There were elements of it that I might even call pretty brilliant--especially that opening scene.

Posted by: Lindsay at January 5, 2011 3:25 PM

2010 would look a lot stronger if you included The King's Speech.

Just sayin'.

Posted by: Ruthie at January 5, 2011 3:28 PM

Whoops, totally didn't mean to insult anyone for liking the movie - just thought the movie was dumb. I absolutely adore some astonishingly stupid movies, and while I may be dumb, I'm certainly too arrogant to call myself that. So my bad if I came across as insulting.

And Slim, Tarantino's not himself Jewish, but he was pretty explicitly going for the angle you describe. There's a great article on this issue here: http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2009/09/hollywood-8217-s-jewish-avenger/7619/

Posted by: Zack at January 5, 2011 3:30 PM

Thanks for the link gonna read it now.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at January 5, 2011 3:33 PM

Of all of those years I have seen the most movies from 2007, but I found several of them to be highly overrated and I actively disliked one of them (which is pretty close to the top of that list).

The only year where I thought every movie on the list that I saw was brilliant, where I left the theater thinking "wow!" was 2006. I saw fewer that year than I did in '07 or '09 but the quality of the movies I did see was far superior.

Posted by: DominaNefret at January 5, 2011 3:34 PM

That Atlantic story is great. Thanks Zack!

Posted by: Lindsay at January 5, 2011 3:38 PM

2010's problem is that it didn't have the broad super-hit that other years can claim. No Dark Knight, no Wall-E, nor any of those movies in the top 10 that absolutely everyone saw. (note: I blame part of this on the fact that the best movie of the year was based on Facebook and Mark Zuckerberg. I know it's great, I love Fincher, but I just don't give a fuck.)

Did any of these films break the $100 million mark? I don't think so.

ChristianH has a point in regards to 2008. Milk should have been up there. I also just don't get the lack of respect for The Wrestler. Fuck I love that movie.

And the final point I'd like to make about 2008, is one that the good denizens of Pajiba should not be so want to forget.

Let The Right One In was released in January of 2008. How many movies this year would you rather watch?

Posted by: D-Day at January 5, 2011 3:45 PM

2006 for the not at all likely win. A little (or a lot) heavy on the dramas, but I love 9/10 of those movies, even if some - like United 93 - I don't think I could emotionally withstand a repeat viewing.

Posted by: nosio at January 5, 2011 3:54 PM

Judging by the sh*t movies posted I guess 2010 was a banner year.

Posted by: IJ Reilly at January 5, 2011 4:00 PM

To the original question, I'd say that 2010 was on par with the previous years. Some very good movies, some overhyped/overblown movies (I'm looking at you, The Social Network!) and one or two that we'll discover in later years once the noise settles down and we are left only with the movies themselves.

Ultimately, it's tough to say what movies will live beyond this year. But let me use my Nostradamus-like powers and make some predictions:

Inception will be on an endless loop on HBO.

The Town and True Grit will make themselves at home alongside the other "New Classics" from TNT, being repeated ad nauseum with Sahara and Gladiator.

The Social Network will disappear onto the Starz black hole along with Crash.

The documentaries will end up on IFC or some such channel. No one will care.

Scott Pilgrim will become a gameshow host.

Posted by: Fredo at January 5, 2011 4:01 PM

I haven't seen any of your 2010 yet. Some of them haven't been released here yet and the others I missed/wasn't interested in. I went with 2007 but 2006 was close.

Posted by: Carrie at January 5, 2011 4:16 PM

2009 by far for me. Star Trek, Fantastic Mr. Fox, (500) Days of Summer, District 9, Up, Up in the Air, AND the Hurt Locker? All fantastic movies.

I'm pretty suprised 2007 is ahead in the poll. Knocked Up, Lars and the Real Girl and Juno really didn't do it for me.

Posted by: camytaru at January 5, 2011 4:36 PM

This kind of bummed me out. Seems like each list needed some filler to get to ten.

Posted by: Ted Dancin' at January 5, 2011 4:43 PM

"2009 by far for me. Star Tr..."
Posted by: camytaru at January 5, 2011 4:36 PM


aaaaand you lost me, all I'm getting is static.

/closely watching Scully

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at January 5, 2011 4:45 PM

I went with 2007, because The Assassination of Jesse James, etc., No Country for Old Men, There Will be Blood, and Zodiac are some of the best movies of the decade, and as someone said, fall really easy into "instant classic" status. Plus, Knocked Up and Ratatouille!

Honestly, though, I thought 2007, 2008, and 2009 were all much better than this year. Granted, there are still quite a few I need to see. I just know there weren't a whole lot I felt the need or the desire to suffer for at the multiplex.

Posted by: RobP at January 5, 2011 5:18 PM

BSlim: Have you seen the Plinkett Review of Star Trek?

Posted by: RobP at January 5, 2011 5:20 PM

Had to go with 2007. 2009 has some great films in its line-up but I don't think any of them can hold a candle to There Will Be Blood or No Country for Old Men.

Posted by: csb at January 5, 2011 6:00 PM

Hovering the mouse arrow over the survey, I thought back to 2008 and how great a year it was for music- the last really really good year, in my opinion. Then, I clicked 2008 on the film survey and submitted it, before going back and seeing the list and remembering that my money was on 2007 (the last really really good year for film).
Ah, shit. Whatever.

Posted by: krza at January 5, 2011 6:24 PM

@RobP

Man that site is fantastic, added to the favorites, and while I don't agree with his liking it (for the reasons he did) I enjoyed the review. The guy is fucking funny, "people want shooting." Thank you for the link.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at January 5, 2011 6:38 PM

I did a count of how many movies I truly liked from each year and 2009 seems to be the winner. However, I haven't seen all the films on these lists. Most of them I planned on seeing but I never got a chance and still haven't seen, for no real reason.

Posted by: KC at January 5, 2011 7:06 PM

wow, i forgot 2006 kicked so much movie arse.
as for 2010, natalie portman made me feel like a pimply 16 year old with a raging bonerific star crush, and i can't really think about much else.

Posted by: dainzo at January 5, 2011 8:30 PM

What about No Country For Fat Chicks and The Social Disease?

Posted by: Jo 'Mama' Besser at January 5, 2011 8:47 PM

call me crazy (don't you dare!) but i voted for 2008. i've seen 8 out of the ten and i really liked them all. the visitor was amazing as was tell no one and they're only 6 and 5 respectively. also, just love, love, love the dark knight. there really are lots of great movies every year.

Posted by: splinter at January 5, 2011 8:47 PM

2009 jumps out at me, but I think 2006 is the close runner up. There are 3 movies on there from 2006 that I love: Brick, Pan's Labryinth, and The Departed (in no particular order). 2009 was just a great year, the only one on that list I really did not enjoy was The Fantastic Mr. Fox - I'm really not a Wes Anderson fan.

Posted by: Even Stevens at January 6, 2011 12:03 AM

Not sure why 2006 isn't getting more love.
Did anybody read "Children of Men"? I did and don't do it. The fact that a movie that good came from a book that horrid is amazing.

Posted by: PB3 at January 6, 2011 12:30 AM

2009 has to lose points for also having the following movies.
Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen
The Twilight Saga: New Moon
G.I. Joe: The Rise of Cobra
Paul Blart: Mall Cop
X-Men Origins: Wolverine
Ice Age: Dawn of the Dinosaurs (for the retarded name alone)

All of these were in the top 20 domestic grossing movies of 2009

Posted by: PB3 at January 6, 2011 12:56 AM

I'm torn between '07 and '09.

Posted by: Uda at January 6, 2011 4:27 AM

Despite the Holy Double of There Will Be Blood and No Country For Old Men - which to me balance out any atrocity the American movie industry has, or will ever, throw at us - I've gotta cast the zeke vote for '09. Forgive the pun, but it was a fucking glourious year. I mean, Avatar for chrissakes! That made like the most money like ever and is like totally a whole world with plants and birds and rocks and things! 3D! And loadsadragons! AND THEN A BIGGER DRAGON!! AND THEN MORE BLUE TRIBES AND SHIT!

No, even that steaming pile of three dimensional excrement can't stink up '09 enough to overpower the awesomeness found on your list and elsewhere:
Anvil!, The Wrestler, Bronson, Il Divo, In The Loop, Timecrimes, Milk, Moon, A Serious Man, Synecdoche..

Come back, '09, I fucking miss you.

Posted by: zeke the pig at January 6, 2011 4:29 AM

I thought Inglorious Basterds was dumb, and in stark contrast to all the lovely polite people who are trying not to offend others by allowing them their opinions, behold!: It was nadgersuck, and you are less cool for enjoying it. I actually remember hating it now, and would have walked out, if I had not been paid to watch it. Money is a powerful tool.

Psst, I voted '07. Jesse James + Will Be Blood + Zodiac could be my entire dvd collection, and I'd be happy. I already loved Dominik and PTA and Fincher by '06, then all three launch a new one in a year? Pfffeewwwgasm.

Posted by: The Only New Zealander at January 6, 2011 6:30 AM

Did anybody read "Children of Men"?

I tried. I gave up not very far in, it was just dreadful.

Posted by: Carrie at January 6, 2011 8:24 AM

/closely watching Scully

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at January 5, 2011 4:45 PM

Well, shit. I better update my will. Who will get my Star Trek TNG collection?

Posted by: Scully at January 6, 2011 9:23 AM

Zeke The Pig, actually The Wrestler and Milk were from 2008. In case that tips your anti-Avatar scale at all.

Posted by: ChristianH at January 6, 2011 2:35 PM

Dang, thanks, I need to slow down with the drinking. Early-onset senility does not aquit itself well on forums.

Extra points for '08. Still; '09 takes the whiskey.

Posted by: zeke the pig at January 7, 2011 4:24 AM

I think the Polls' results as of now rank the years superbly. I didn't realize how good of a year 2009 was (didn't Zombieland come out in '09 as well?) until I looked at this list. While I believe '07 has the far superior "Oscar-worthy" movies, '09 wins based on variety and staying power. As good as There Will Be Blood is, it won't be remembered or rewatched as much as Inglorious or Up or Star Trek. '08 comes in 3rd simply because The Dark Knight is one of the (if not THE) top movie of the past 5 years. '06 is close behind with The Departed leading the way for my personal taste.

2010 was a HORRIBLE year for movies. I'm sorry, but if The Town is one of the best movies of the year...you know something is wrong. To be fair, I still have yet to see a lot of the movies on Pajiba's list, I really doubt (based on reviews, and audience feedback) that 2010's "best" movies will have any staying power in the future.

Seriously. 2010 what the hell?

Posted by: Littlejon2001 at January 7, 2011 12:54 PM