free counter with statistics The Pajiba Suggestion Box | Pajiba - Scathing Reviews for Bitchy People

Suggestion Box.jpg
The Pajiba Suggestion Box


An Evening Comment Diversion / Dustin Rowles

Comment Diversions | August 31, 2009 | Comments (266)


It’s been eight years since I last attended a class, but I do still tend to feel a kinship to the school calendar, and as such, the day after Labor Day (or thereabouts) is when we usually make tweaks to the site (some minor, some — like last year — major). There won’t be an huge modifications to the site this year, I don’t think. But, so far, there are a couple of changes you can expect.

For one, Pajiba Music won’t be returning next week, as TK announced this morning. I personally liked the section a lot (and found quite a few new artists thanks to it), but it never really completely clicked with the Pajibans. It was no fault of the music writers, who were phenomenal (and I can’t thank them enough for their contributions over the last 9 months or so). I just think it was too difficult to merge Music with Movie and TV — the audiences are very distinct. But — as TK mentioned — they will continue on elsewhere. We’ll definitely keep those interested informed of there whereabouts. And, again, thanks to TK and all the wonderful PM writers.

Second: Comment diversions will probably roll back to once (occasionally twice) a week. I never meant to start doing them nightly; I used it as a crutch a couple of times when there was no trade news to cover, and it just became habit. But I don’t think I can continue to conjure up four diversion ideas a week for much longer (unless someone can think of an idea as to how).

There may be a couple of other tweaks in store, but mostly to do with scheduling, which few but the most observant will even notice. I also hope, with Prisco’s blessing, to keep the Cannonball Read going into a second cycle, maybe make it a little a less daunting, get even more participation, and move it completely onto Pajiba (again, Prisco willing). I really love the Cannonball Read.

However, and on the suggestion of Cindy, as we look ahead to post-Labor Day, I thought it might be a good time to ask you for suggestions for features, columns, or other ideas. I don’t know if we’ll implement any of them, but I’ll definitely listen and take it all into consideration. So, if you have any ideas for the site, this is your opportunity to let us know.

Also, for my own edification: Thumbs up or down on “Two Truths and a Lie” and “Trailer Appreciation”? I like them both, but neither feature has caught on all that well with our readership.


The Tournament Trailer | The Lord of the Rings Trilogy



Comments

I think you should keep two truths and a lie, as it helps some of the most horrifying trade news go down easier. I don't have an opinion on trailer appreciation though, it strikes me as kind of just filler.

Posted by: Andy at August 31, 2009 9:14 PM

Bring back (or make official again) Hangover Theater and Underappreciated Gems!

Posted by: Chris P. at August 31, 2009 9:24 PM

A hearty seconding to continuing Cannonball Read (Prisco willing)! I need a good source of book recommendations, as godtopus knows I don't get any from my face-to-face friends.

TK et al., thanks so much for your musical contributions. I admit I wasn't a totally regular reader (damn work cutting into my Pajiba-ing time), but I've enjoyed what I've read, and my musical-hermit self managed to get a couple of kick-ass tips from you, so many, many thanks for that. I look forward to checking out the new venue!

Posted by: meaux at August 31, 2009 9:25 PM

I want Cannonball Read to keep going! I love seeing book reviews from a site I pretty much trust in all other regards. And if it starts with a clean slate (whenever the new "year" rolls around) I'm totally jumping on that train.

I liked the music reviews a lot. I'm sorry to see them go. But I'll be following them in the new location.

I would like to see another Paheeba Day, since it was amazing and I want to contribute.

Posted by: myysharona (formerly Sharon) at August 31, 2009 9:31 PM

OK, so, you know how the lady Pajibans took over the site for a day last year? And it was totally awesome and special and everyone had a puppy that pooped rainbows? Well, maybe you could get the coven of the Godtopussy to start a weekly column that would rotate through a list of willing participants. It'd cover some kind of television or movie, but it would be slightly more free form. Like I know one lady was working on a retrospective of dance movies, or someone else could do a History of Women In Sports In Movies, that sort of thing. Obviously subject to site owners approval and editing, blah blah, but if there's a schedule then we can have time to plan and submit things enough in advance to do a re-write if necessary.

Posted by: Rusty (formerly Genny) at August 31, 2009 9:32 PM

Yay on Cannonball Read, Two Truths and a Lie, Underappreciated Gems, Hangover Theater, Twisted Masterpieces, and Boozehound Cinephile!

Nay on... well, nothing.

Trailer Appreciation needs to step up its game. Either let's get some really awesome trailers from yesteryear that we might not have seen or start showcasing more recently released trailers. Although I guess we already do that.

Posted by: Macafee at August 31, 2009 9:39 PM

Personally, I'd like to see the weekly comment diversion move back to a late-afternoon spot. I don't get a chance to say much around here in the later evening hours, when I'm shorter on time, tired from workouts, and paying more attention to the wife.

Also: Pajiba Music has been a fantastic experience for me, and I'm eternally grateful for the chance to take part. I hope that lots of you will follow us to our new home.

Posted by: Sean at August 31, 2009 9:42 PM

Awww, I'm sad that Pajiba Music didn't fly with everyone. I looked forward to the playlists and have added a number of songs to my library that wouldn't have found their way there otherwise.

I also want to keep the Cannonball read and am more than willing to participate when it rolls around again.

Two Truths and a Lie is great fun. It could be giving the wrong people ideas though. Hollywood folk seem to have no trouble coming up with ridiculous ideas all by themselves, so I doubt that they're trolling for them, but I wouldn't put it past them either.

Posted by: Eyvi at August 31, 2009 9:43 PM

I love your idea Genny. It's been great to see some of the columns here and there by commenters - including the book reviews. I love the book reviews, so please keep those going. Also enjoy Two Truths and a Lie.

I'd suggest some sort of regular TV news column, possibly once a week?

Posted by: Cindy at August 31, 2009 9:47 PM

Please keep the retrospectives coming. Obviously, you gotta have current reviews -- but it's always seemed to me that movie critics write with one hand (figuratively) tied behind their backs, because they can't discuss the movie in full.

But the retrospectives allow for the kind of wonky deconstruction that I've always liked, and Drew Morton is presently killing it.

Posted by: sansho1 at August 31, 2009 9:48 PM

Good point all who mentioned Ted - where's he been?

Posted by: Cindy at August 31, 2009 9:49 PM

Oh, and I like the frequent comment diversions, myself. But I understand if it's a pain in the ass to keep up with the pace.

Oh, and the weekend hijack threads are fun for those of us who don't get their share of commenting in during their workday (grr, have I mentioned that work has been cutting into my Pajiba time?? Stupid WebSense blocking all the good stuff....)

'Kay, I think that's my two cents' worth and then some.

Posted by: meaux at August 31, 2009 9:49 PM

I'd keep them both, they seem to be working fine.

Posted by: George at August 31, 2009 9:50 PM

I reckon Pajiba Music would have worked much better (at least for me) if there was a little more diversity in the styles covered - it always seemed to largely consist of quirky indie/emo/post-rock, hip-hop or mainstream metal - and while I have much love for The Appleseed Cast, Explosions In The Sky, Saul Williams and Lamb Of God (no, seriously - I'm a little schizophrenic like that - I can go from strumming 'Marigold & Patchwork' on my guitar to frantically riffing away at 'Laid To Rest' in the blink of an eye), a lot of the Pajiba Music articles covered bands that I frankly never gave a toss about, and after checking them out as a result of the article, still never had an urge to listen to again.

I suppose that's a result of only having three or four writers - I imagine a music section of Pajiba would involve having an entire staff dedicated to just that. Hell, if you ever fancy expanding the section, I could contribute reviews in the areas of brutal death metal, post-hardcore, grindcore and black metal... But of course, that would be of interest to very few of the site's readers, I imagine.

So, yeah, I reckon retiring Pajiba Music is the way to go, even though the quality of the writing was great, despite me personally not being interested in the bands that were covered most of the time.

Posted by: Dill The Devil at August 31, 2009 10:00 PM

Just because I don't really coment on the music doens't mean I don't always read them. Maybe there could be a way you could do it, but a little bit less to make it easier.

It's a nice feature.

Posted by: Withnail at August 31, 2009 10:10 PM

I think that more readers should be allowed to submit reviews of films into either the Pajiba Blockbuster, Under appreciated Gems or Twisted Masterpiece sections. I'm always in the mood to share film input, especially those of obscure and weird finds.
And bring those back, because I love them so much!

Posted by: Kamikaze Feminist at August 31, 2009 10:17 PM

Since you asked...

Over the past couple of years while Pajiba has gotten fatter and more fulfilling content-wise its also gotten a lot more clique-y. Good for y'all that the comments are kind of a "cool kids club" but the comment lingo and culture has kind of taken over many of the features. So many lines in the posts are clearly inside jokes that I don't get and references to people and stories I don't know, that I feel like I'm crashing the party just by reading them.

So my suggestion is to keep the comment stuff in the comments (EE is fine with me, since its clearly comment related content I can just skip it). Leave the inside jokes and referrences out of the stories.

Hope this didn't come across like sour grapes.

Posted by: Jen at August 31, 2009 10:20 PM

I like the "Two Truths and a Lie" thing - given how much trade news is pretty infuriating these days, it's a nice way to soften the pill by having at least one bit of "well, at least they're not doing that yet" with it. Plus, I was getting genuinely fearful that you'd fall victim to some kind of rage-induced harm, like spontaneous combustion or putting your head through the monitor.

Trailer Appreciation I tend to click on less, mostly because, out of the first few, none of them struck me as being hugely entertaining trailers. That said, I don't think I've ever seen a trailer for a movie that I thought was cool and good and artistic in and of itself, so maybe they're just hard to find?

As for the general retrospectives, though, keep 'em coming. And the Boozehound Cinephile. And the liveblogs of awful movies. Gotta love a bit of nostalgia.

Posted by: Shay at August 31, 2009 10:21 PM

I didn't read all of the music stuff, because it was just not generally my particular style of music (I have HORRIBLE taste in music, I'm fully aware of this) but I liked the playlist suggestions. I found some music that I wouldn't have otherwise listened to.

I liked Ted's "Pajibasaur" articles which seemed to disappear. I know his articles don't get a lot of comments (because he's so incredibly thorough and it's hard to add to his already well-written articles), but they're quite enjoyable to read.

I'm biased, but I sure like the No Whining Wednesday posts! I'm all for anything that occasionally lightens the mood or reminds people to not be SO negative all the time.

And with the new TV season starting, I'm looking forward to more TV reviews and recaps!

Posted by: Lainey at August 31, 2009 10:30 PM

I'm very fond of Two Truths and a Lie

I don't really care one way or the other for Trailer Appreciation

Posted by: Randy at August 31, 2009 10:43 PM

I'd like to see more of the Underappreciated Gems and Pajiba Blockbusters features, come to think of it - I always enjoyed those ones.

Posted by: Dill The Devil at August 31, 2009 10:44 PM

Bring back regular real time reviews!!!

Posted by: Kate at August 31, 2009 10:46 PM

I think a Pajiba Forum would be nice. It'd be easier for the eloquents to socialize.

Posted by: Lucas at August 31, 2009 10:48 PM

I second the suggestion for a weekend hijack thread to be a weekly thing--maybe under a theme from a Diversion.

I like Two Truths and a Lie because, as someone said before, it keeps the worst news from being too horrible. I'm not sure about Trailer Appreciation--in all honesty I skip the posts. I'd rather get full reviews of the movies featured in them.

And I really, really love the Trashy TV reviews, and look forward to more TV reviews when the seasons start back up again.

Also, some of us in the Cannonball Read have cut-off dates in December of this year. It was only Prisco and the people who started it early who had the end date of September. So I think quite a few of us still have a ways to go and will keep writing the reviews...would it be the worst thing in the world to wait until the current participants finish? Remember that Prisco cut off the entrance date at December of last year, so maybe keep it going til December of this year?

Hmmm. What else. I would love more Guides, and more reader-vote dictated things...I love the Pajiba 10, and the votes we did for the Top 20 seasons. Being the EE master I have to say I REALLY love the stuff where the commenters help contribute to content somehow. It's one of the things I like best about this place.

Posted by: figgy at August 31, 2009 10:49 PM

I was one of those who never read the music reviews unless it was an artist I already liked. I did at the start but it was just too uncommon for them to have an artist that interested me unfortunately. I really like the 2 truths and a lie, though I'd like it if the lie was revealed a little sooner (maybe in the last post for the night).

The only other thing I see obviously missing from the site is videogame reviews, since you've now covered tv, music, movies and books, games are the only major medium you've left out. Though it's less pressing now you're no longer doing music.

Posted by: Chugga at August 31, 2009 10:53 PM

Leave the inside jokes and referrences out of the stories.

Meh, Jen if that's sour grapes, my vines must be shitty, too. Finally getting regular (albeit temp) employment has left me unable to post a lot, or for that matter, really wanting to; but it's especially hard to get into the comments when it feels like most of the stories reference some hilarious comment from the night-or-so before. Again, comments are awesome for running wild, but... anyway.

Because of my absence, I assume my vote counts for half or something, so the real import thing is this...

I'd give everyone a cookie if the Boozehound would post more. I wanna learn how to drink like a lady fish.

Posted by: Kayanne at August 31, 2009 10:54 PM

I'd like to see an official "Weekend Hijack Thread," something that goes up some time Saturday. Those of us with miserable lives we wish to escape face an awful time on the weekends when there's little to no activity on Pajiba. How about making the Comment Diversion a Saturday event? Those things beg to be hijacked (and usually are) anyway.

Also, I lurve it when y'all review stuff that's got a little dust on it. I loved the recent Noir Series and I was thrilled with the annual Vintage Weeks. I envision a series where you review a film from each year of the last one hundred years...or fifty, if you only want to do talkies. Put up one per week and that'll carry you through a year (or two).

Posted by: Jerce at August 31, 2009 10:59 PM

Also...I have to say that maybe there's too many separate posts dedicated to trailers, and sometimes they don't get so many comments. Maybe do posts with 2 or 3 trailers? It might help with clutter and keep the big stories from being pushed down so fast.

Posted by: figgy at August 31, 2009 11:02 PM

But the retrospectives allow for the kind of wonky deconstruction that I've always liked, and Drew Morton is presently killing it.

Second that.

Posted by: alphawhiskey at August 31, 2009 11:06 PM

More TV Whore, Boozehound and Hangover Theatre!

Posted by: Chugga at August 31, 2009 11:08 PM

Oh and pies for the constant updates of Trash TV.

Posted by: Kayanne at August 31, 2009 11:10 PM

Two Truths is cool. Trailer, meh.

I tuned out of Pajiba Music pretty quickly, for three reasons:

1. I just don't connect much with music today.

2. And I don't have the inclination (or the gear) to explore.

1 and 2 are my fault for getting old.

3. There's so much good stuff on here now that even devoting probably two hours a day (and sometimes more) to Pajiba as I do, I still don't have the time to read everything. A good post and string of comments can eat up a good half hour, especially if I try to compose a thoughtful comment myself. I'm forced to triage, and since this is primarily a movie site the music just fell to the bottom. That's no fault of the writers at all, it's just a time management conundrum.

I'm OK with diversions going back to one or two a week, because I sympathize with DR's situation. I'm often stuck for just one topic to throw up for the weekend. But if we do cut back to two a week, I hope one of them IS for the weekend.

As for a constructive suggestion, I thought Drew's work on film noir was very well done. I would be interested in seeing more genre exploration like that.

Otherwise, I really have no problems or large suggestions for the site. I like how the thing just seems to evolve and stays fresh and interesting and funny. Very very funny. Y'all are GREAT company.

Posted by: , (TCFKAB) at August 31, 2009 11:13 PM

What about keysha coles?!? Hey Dustin!

Posted by: severin at August 31, 2009 11:14 PM

I loves the Pajiba.

Posted by: laredo at August 31, 2009 11:15 PM

I "third"? more Boozehound.

I would like to see some running commentary of shitty films, though, like our own version of MST3K.

Maybe every week(end) or once a month you do a live review of a film (good or bad) that is on HBO, Showtime... so that some/many of us can also watch and we can jump in with our own comments/jokes. Something fun or that begs to be made fun of

or maybe it can be done live with the LOST recap?

just thinkin' out loud here

Posted by: L.O.V.E. at August 31, 2009 11:19 PM

I second (third?) the motion for an official weekend comment diversion/hijack.

I will miss the music column, but I guess I can just follow it in it's new home.

Also, I'm going to start begging again, but I would love to see a "Rescue Me" re-cap. This season is already over, save the finale, it gives you overlords plenty of time to get caught up and get a writer on it for next season. Please?

Pretty, pretty please??

Posted by: Ashes at August 31, 2009 11:20 PM

Please please, get rid of the interceptor ads. This isn't gamespy.

Posted by: anony-mouse at August 31, 2009 11:22 PM

Kudos to TK & co for the music columns, I'm guessing it's not so much the quality of your work as the scale of the task? At least movies come on a slightly more contained schedule, the sheer volume and diversity of music about makes it a tougher gig to cover in any sort of depth. FWIW, I enjoyed them anyway


But the retrospectives allow for the kind of wonky deconstruction that I've always liked, and Drew Morton is presently killing it.

Second that.

Posted by: alphawhiskey at August 31, 2009 11:06 PM

I'll third it, assuming you mean it in a good way. Ditto on more Boozehound, though Ted's time will no doubt have something to do with it. I enjoy the retrospectives, mainly because it is a chance to reconsider something I have seen, rather than just compliment a review of something I haven't.

Posted by: Squirrelgripper at August 31, 2009 11:40 PM

I really enjoy classic movies reviews. And I mean classic in a everything from ghostbusters to film noir. There are some amazing writers here and the crap hollywood is producing today doesn't really lend itself to good articles. I would really appreciate more reviews of good older movies. For example, I really enjoyed Drew's review of Dogma. It also helps pajibaites find good movies that we may have missed. I know this is sacroligious, but I did not see plains, trains, and autombiles until after people talked it up here.

I also think it would be quite entertaining to have a reviewer do a MSTK3000 style take on some of the worst movies of all time. I'm thinking howard the duck, ishtar, etc.

Posted by: "luker" the barbarian at August 31, 2009 11:41 PM

1. I completely agree -- a weekend comment diversion type feature would be awesome.
2. Each trailer appreciation you post makes my day.
3. You guys are all amazing. If I were 13 I'd do one of those little heart things.

Posted by: esme at August 31, 2009 11:43 PM

Also, bucdaddy has a really good idea. I personally know next to NOTHING about actual film theory and criticism. I would be really interested in learning more about the history of movies, etc. Therefore, more retrospectives, like the film noir/tarantino series, would be awesome. Or, even, a gradual guide to basic film theory stuff?

Posted by: "luker" the barbarian at August 31, 2009 11:44 PM

I like Two Truths and a Lie, although I'm usually wrong.

I didn't read the music all the time, just because, but when I did read I picked up on a few new artists. I'll definitely follow the music.

I miss Boozehound.

The cannonball reads have been great, I promise to participate next time. I've put quite a few of the books on my list to read.

It would be fun to have a Sunday morning hangover MST3K, or something. I know I check the site over the weekend, even though I know there are no new posts, but I can't help myself.

Posted by: DoubleH at August 31, 2009 11:52 PM

I like cannonball read and I'm all for a second cycle, however, when I go to the books section to find a good recommendation I feel lost in a sea of titles. Maybe you could organize by genre or separate good reviews from bad. Anything to give me a place to start.

Posted by: Mr. Junior at August 31, 2009 11:57 PM

I'm very sad to hear that Music is going away. I must admit I've been slow to dip my foot in there, but I've been secretly sampling some of the offerings (and wasn't there an article or two about the old school record labels...that rocked my world) and you guys on the music team have opened more than a few doors for me. Unfair.

As for the rest of Jiba - yes, I agree with everything above - trailers did not compel, 'at least one is a lie' is pretty good, and the retrospectives, guides, Drew's Noir action, and trash tv are extremely compelling offerings besides the always quality reviews. I billionth the request for more boozehound. I like when the community gives back and random reader submissions are always interesting. I'd love more of those thorough reviews on older films suggested above.

and...I give up. I just wrote about three paragraphs on reorganizing the content on the masthead, but it sounded stupid when I re-read it, so I deleted it. I'm amazed you aren't insane yet, Rowles. All this and Axl's damn juice better be cold.

Posted by: replica at September 1, 2009 12:06 AM

Boozehound, for its corny title, is probably the most well-written feature on here. Always look forward to his careful deconstructions. It often makes me immediately put something into the Netflix queue.

I'd also like to see more Steven Lloyd Wilson's excellent classic science fiction reviews. They make me long for movies I never would have considered rewatching.

Not knocking the other writers, just what I enjoy.

The Seriously Random Lists seem pointless when they are just lists, without any description, explanation, or snark. I tend to skip them. All lists should feature the author's personal insights into each item, that's what makes them fun to read.

You have a fine site that is fun and entertaining.

Posted by: Bluesilver at September 1, 2009 12:09 AM

I miss the occasional "real-time" reviews of totally lame movies/shows, it seems like there used to be more.

Whatever happened to Classics Week? I see the film noir features, but its not the same without the Pajiba banner change for the week.

Posted by: Finn at September 1, 2009 12:10 AM

I agree about the cliquey feeling here, and it's really discouraging.

Posted by: Caroline at September 1, 2009 12:19 AM

i tend to read nearly every post, even if i don't comment in them (no, i do NOT hog the threads). and i read them all the more when i have no idea of the subject matter. i like being clued in. plus that whole obsessive-completist thing. i found a lot of exposure to music i normally wouldn't have heard and that's a Good thing. maybe a once a week recap of what's going on from TK and the gang. otherwise, why don't you just cut off my foot or a hand? i could stand to be a little more unbalanced.

Posted by: gp at September 1, 2009 12:23 AM

I'm all for change..as long as its for the better...

Posted by: laredo at September 1, 2009 12:44 AM

I would like to see a sample of reviews versus this site. For example, Dustin hates it, but posts 5 to 10 other reviews to show the way others are in the tank.

Conservative Corner, once a week or the like?

Posted by: richmac at September 1, 2009 1:04 AM

I personally enjoyed Pajiba Music, but music is very difficult to write about nowadays because of the variety of tastes and so.

I like Two Truths and a Lie. As for new features, it'd be fun to see more "ideal casting" diversions. I don't know, maybe you could put an imaginary remake or a book as the basis, and the Eloquents could fill in the blanks (ex: "Catcher in the Rye: The Movie. Director: Eli Roth. Holden Caufield: Zombie Chris Farley, and so on...)

I'd like to see more Real Time reviews, more Pajiba Blockbusters, Hangover Theater, and Paheeba Day in memory of Alabama Pink.

As for the "clique feeling"... Guys, we've been over this before. You can either post comments or you can stay for the articles. You know Pajiba is not a website anymore. It's a community, so it's pretty obvious that some inside jokes may show up on some of the posts. Several lurkers have started posting regularly, sometimes regarding the posts, sometimes to share a special moment by the fire with the Eloquents.

There are thousands of other movie blogs in the web, but what makes Pajiba special and what keeps us all coming back here every day, whether it's to post a comment or to lurk, is the familiarity of it all. We all know Rowles gets hard with Ry-Rey, we all know BSlim will call us on our bullshit, we all know we're gonna laugh our asses off with reviews about MTV shows, we know what to expect from a candid comment diversion, we all know how important Alabama Pink was (and still is) for every reader in this site.

I think it was Rich from FourFour who said that Pajiba readers, unlike most people with Internet access, respond to actual text. The quality of the reviews on this site is top-notch, and we as readers appreciate it. You know how hard it is to find people who actually surf the net to read? It's only natural for a bunch of geeks to bond over this. So I must insist: Pajiba is a community. Don't think of us as people who feel superior enough to create "cliques". It's pretty obvious that arrogant pricks like us want to convert everybody else to this way of surfing. If only to prove we were right about the awesomness of this site from the very start.

/cocksucking off

Posted by: Sofía at September 1, 2009 1:11 AM

Lose the cliquey keep Two Truths...miss the Real Time reviews

Posted by: Be Adequite! at September 1, 2009 1:11 AM

How about a "reader review of the week"?

Posted by: Cole Hufstedler at September 1, 2009 1:13 AM

How about a "reader review of the week"?

Posted by: Cole Hufstedler at September 1, 2009 1:13 AM

I have no idea why those at pajiba feel the need to review old - sometimes really old - films. Was there someone out there really dying for a Ghostbusters review? Because you could ask nearly anyone you know for one, since the film's been seen by damn near everyone under the age of 45. Kill those pointless rehashes.

If you want to continue to bring up wrongly forgotten films, that's a different matter. But reviewing old blockbusters is a time waster for both those writing it and those reading it.

And you should ease up on the number of posts. More is not always the merrier.

Posted by: B-Unit at September 1, 2009 1:14 AM

Oh yeah, and you could cut back on the ads - pop up or otherwise - you money grubbing whores.

Posted by: B-Unit at September 1, 2009 1:19 AM

It's fine work.

At the risk of being called a pretentious asshole - no, that's not right, intentionally courting being called a pretentious asshole, again - there's a long, honored history of scathing commentary and snark. Many of the folks we remember now as "greats" made their living day to day doing commentary that was not kind, often starting in some little, out of the way publication that later became famous.

So, you are in good company, from Voltaire through Swift & Twain to the Algonquin Round Table -Dorothy Parker would be right at home here - Evelyn Waugh, Harlan Ellison and more. I rarely find current commentary as on-point, informed and entertaining as here. Camille Paglia on Salon, George Will when he's on, but since he became known, he writes about 10x more than he has the bandwidth for.

And why shouldn't you, I, or anyone else at least aim for that kind of company? Better is, well, better dammit. We don't get close to good without at least trying.

So, well done, and thank you.

+1 on:
- keep two truths and a lie

- bring back (or make official again) Hangover Theater, Underappreciated Gems, Twisted Masterpieces, TV Whore and Boozehound Cinephile

- continue Cannonball Read

- more liveblogs of awful movies / television.


+1 on these are great ideas from the comments above. They said it better than I would have.

- "Expanding on Paheeba Day." - Generally, when the spirit moves some revolting sub-group, let them be revolting. "... coven of the Godtopussy to start a weekly column ..." Various gaggles with an itch to scratch for a while will appear from time to time. Make a place for them to go for it.

- "It's been great to see some of the columns here and there by commenters - including the book reviews." Make the mechanism for that a bit more obvious. There are some great writers among the commenters. Make a way to propose or submit the occasional editorial / rant and solicit similar stuff.

- "I would love more Guides, and more reader-vote dictated things..." Guides where you are encouraged to explain your choice are more interesting. So rather than "The 5 best ." try "The best and why."

- "Maybe every week(end) or once a month you do a live review of a film (good or bad) that is on HBO, Showtime... so that some/many of us can also watch and we can jump in with our own comments/jokes. Something fun or that begs to be made fun of." - Yes. That.

I think a general move to put a bit more energy into herding others' contributions, and a bit less into creating your own would pay off. Step back / step out from time to time, to get a look at the whole and nudge the pile in a direction vs. doing things yourself. The worst part of mixing in work from other folks will be the folks who don't execute.

Posted by: BierceAmbrose at September 1, 2009 1:19 AM

No more SERIOUSLY RANDOM LIST.

More Unappreciated Gems and other retrospects. These, usually, longer and more researched or thought out pieces are where you guys shine and impress. Most of your writing about movies, rather than the celebrity gossip stuff (which is also enjoyed), is downright fucking insightful and you can feel the love for film. You are also one of the lesser pandering review blogs, and that's tough to find on inter-web technology.

Maybe try to delve into comics a little more. Maybe test out a comic section. Wednesday review of comics for a couple weeks, see the reaction. Yeah? Sound good? You all agree? Yeah?

Posted by: Brian at September 1, 2009 1:24 AM

was it time for the annual Sofia putting her foot down? i almost missed it!

i second all that. the cliquey-ness is all in your head. you think i would know any of these people if they came up and bit me on the ass (besides jeremy)?
everyone, right now, right there in your seats, de-lurk!
i, for one, would love to see what you have to say about all kinds of shit. it's one big encompassing clique. it's the internet. type something. this invitation shouldn't even be necessary.

Posted by: gp at September 1, 2009 1:28 AM

/cocksucking off

Posted by: Sofía at September 1, 2009 1:11 AM

Yah, I vote for more of that!

Posted by: L.O.V.E. at September 1, 2009 1:28 AM

Well said, Sofia .

Posted by: ashes at September 1, 2009 1:30 AM

The variety of content offered on the site keeps everything interesting and fresh, but more retrospectives (and guides), please! I second bringing back Classics Week, too. I always enjoy reading reviews on the older stuff, then revisiting them on DVD (I rarely go to the movies).

Posted by: Katie (KP) at September 1, 2009 1:34 AM

Good godtopus. The clique is YOURS. Own it. You're here! It belongs to you like a squee for quality.

Why, look at Spender! He piped up after the april fool's debacle and just couldn't stop. I think you'd be hard pressed to find a more beloved guy around here...and he just started by interacting, same as the rest of us. This place is not a flamewar-about-to-happen nor is it a high school. It is a place where we warmly welcome each other into the fray, and are supportive of the fact that you must be good folk if you have the sense to spend time on this site. I can't imagine a reason anyone would feel left out, unless that's the kind of persona they relish - the outsider.

Maybe it would explain something to reveal that a lot of the people you hear the most from have made even stronger connections to each other through facebook. I can't even begin to tell you how rewarding getting involved has been, simply for 'meeting like-minded people'. It's fabulous and if you stop complaining and start typing, I'd like to meet you too.

Maybe it's because I'm a mom that I'll say this - but it does you no good to stand at the waters edge. Life's too short.

If you're just after reviews, well, okay. Dustin, serve up a Jiba Lite. No comments and pure, clinical review. For the obdurate types.

Posted by: replica at September 1, 2009 1:37 AM

Sophia wrote:

Several lurkers have started posting regularly, sometimes regarding the posts, sometimes to share a special moment by the fire with the Eloquents.

IMO, anyone who chooses to post is an "Eloquent." Those who choose to lurk are Eloquents we who have not yet introduced themselves. Come on in. The Murdertank is transdimensionally non-finite. ("Bigger on the inside than it is on the outside." "That's what I said.") Plenty of room for everybody.

Sophia also wrote:

"There are thousands of other movie blogs in the web, but what makes Pajiba special and what keeps us all coming back ... is the familiarity ... So I must insist: Pajiba is a community. ... It's pretty obvious that arrogant pricks like us want to convert everybody else."

I am holding aloft in salute my ridiculously over-engineered skynet-phone (i-Prod), displaying an accurate, real-time simulation of a flame that flutters as the phone moves, and curves around as you tip the phone this way or that. Seems more appropriate than a lighter for an e-community.

Posted by: BierceAmbrose at September 1, 2009 1:38 AM

I like the weekend hijack idea. Always crazy fun. Maybe a diversion would be to ask suggestions for diversions? Two birds - one stone. We get to rant, you get to cobble ideas.

Didn't read a lot of the music reviews (see TKFAB's post above). Great idea, I just didn't check it out much.

I also love and second the classics/theory idea. It's so great to see reviews for older films that can get passed up in the current shit storm of, well, shit.

As for "cliquiness". C'est la Vie. I post when I can. Often I can't, but I do read the posts and the comments and I love the vast array of sexy/dysfunctional/awesome characters here. Sometimes I get on a roll and type way too much and am just glad I don't get booted. For me the main thing is to wade in and use my brain either by trying to hone my wit or at least my critical faculties.

That to me is the point of Pajiba and that's why I love coming here. So I trust any changes.

Oh. Except more lolcats. They give me teh lulz.

Posted by: Odnon at September 1, 2009 1:59 AM

Pajiba Music!
My favorite was the 90s movies list. Brilliant!

Posted by: Nicole at September 1, 2009 2:05 AM

When you run out of topics for comment diversions, run a comment diversion asking for topics for comment diversions.

Posted by: lwoodpdowd at September 1, 2009 2:27 AM

I didn't mean it in a good way. I really am not a fan of his reviews.

Posted by: alphawhiskey at September 1, 2009 2:40 AM

I heartily support the call for more Underappreciated Gems, Twisted Masterpieces, and/or retrospectives of the type Drew Morton and Steven Lloyd Wilson have been doing. While I enjoy and look forward to the reviews of movies in current release, it's almost more valuable to read well-written pieces about movies I've seen a long time ago, or never seen at all. I've definitely watched some stuff based on articles I read here and really been glad I did.

As for the newer stuff, Trailer Appreciation, "meh". Two Truths and a Lie is fun, in my opinion, but some people take it too seriously - "OK, I googled it and A and C are definitely true." "You're cheating!"

I feel somewhat bad to hear you're getting rid of the music pieces, because the ones I did read were well-done and I'm sure the people who were doing them put a lot of work into it and enjoyed writing them. But the truth is, I didn't read many of them, because I have terrible taste in music, and with lots of things on my plate, I can only have my mind expanded in so many directions. So maybe it is better that the music pieces go to a place where true musicophiles can go and really get into it, and Pajiba can stay mostly a place for cinephiles. Or actually, scathing and bitchy people who also mostly like movies.

Lastly, I'm surprised that with a thread called "Suggestion Box," people haven't been a little more scathing. "Fire so-and-so! Off with their heads! And you must be ad-free, because it's not like this is your full-time job or anything!" Um, yeah.

In closing, keep up the good work.

Posted by: MM at September 1, 2009 2:48 AM

I like the individual album reviews, music-wise. Never quite gelled with the whole "what we're listening to this week" business - like you said, music taste is so varied, so that feature was usually met with a big "aight, whatevs" on my end.

Am I the only one who doesn't like Real-Time Reviews? I'm all for reviews of crappy movies (loved the recent one about Labor Pains), but I find the real-time ones to be a chore to read, so I often don't.

And though I've completely failed at the Cannonball Read (I'm on book #8) this year, I am game to fail again next year (really makes sense to me to make it a year thing, not a September to September thing like I guess this last one unofficially?). It's been super nifty to see myself published here every so often because of it, as well as seeing a steady stream of book reviews on the site. Definitely keep it up - you'll find a lot of people (myself included) willing to help in whatever capacity to see it back again.

Posted by: whatBENwatches at September 1, 2009 3:03 AM

Under-appreciated Gems? Yes please.
Hangover Theatre? Why thank you!
Boozehound Cinephile? That sounds delightful.
Final season of LOST Recaps? I want to go to there.
Mad Men Recaps? Draperlicious!
Live episode commentary session? Sign me up!
Another Pajiba Tshirt sale? Make it happen people.

Questionable use of bold html tags? Bite me.

Posted by: NJ at September 1, 2009 3:04 AM

Two truths and a lie is meh.

Love the Seriously Random Lists most of the time, just for the silliness.

Trailer Appreciation ... I do appreciate a good one, but honestly, how many "old" (say, pre 2000) trailers were actually good? A lot of them sucked, even those for great movies. Seems like something worth throwing in every now and then.

Would love to see reviews of any and all classics, not just from Drew Morton (who's really good btw) but from anyone willing to put some thought into it.

Posted by: Mick J at September 1, 2009 3:24 AM

I also didn't read much of the Pajiba Music. It just wasn't as interesting or inside as actual music publications or vlogs or websites. However, KEEP THE PLAYLISTS. I usually played the songs while I read the site and kept it on if it was really good. It would be cool to have a theme to the playlist in tune with the cinematic if not cultural zeitgest. I still would rather this list be put together by music nerds rather than have readers contributing their favorite tunes. I mean, come on.


I think mostly everything else works well on the site. I like how the Pajiba Love is like a mini-digg. I enjoy the little youtubes and trailers. I really like the cineaste film reviews particularly by stipe42. I like how the trade news drowns out the movie reviews because I normally don't see a movie based on what ya'll think, but I do everlovingly appreciate that we are seeing the same things. I like your sentimental gripes and venomous bombasts, DR, even if DMTH was nowhere near as good as the kool-aid makes it taste round these parts (ok, ok, I love the Evil Dead tril too.) I really do respect what you've done here, Senor Rowles, because Fuck'em. I like how comments flow and even the comment recaps, though I think the best one on that was the Grover kid. Where did he get to?

Posted by: Jackseppelin at September 1, 2009 3:30 AM

I KNEW I forgot something. I have loved loved LOVED Steven Lloyd Wilson's stuff. Getting to read more in-depth reviews of my beloved Doctor Who and Torchwood makes my freaking day. Seriously.
And from the Children of Earth review, a couple people joined me in the pajiba chat. And since then, I have had some hilarious, twisted conversations in there that I might never forget (no matter how hard I scrub).

Posted by: myysharona (formerly Sharon) at September 1, 2009 3:33 AM

Yeah, and I'd probably jump in on a second round of the Cannonball run. I read historical and social theory books mostly- -so fair warning. Personally, I don't like how light some of the Cannonball reviews are, but I like that this site encourages reading. What's that- - core-strengthening?

Posted by: Jackseppelin at September 1, 2009 3:45 AM

I just want to chime in with the others calling shenanigans on the clique nonsense. The boo-hooing about the supposedly cliquey nature of this site has cropped up every now and again for ages, and it's ridiculous.

I've been reading Pajiba for four years, and I started commenting somewhere in the neighbourhood of two years ago. I never received a personalised email or engraved invitation to speak up; I chose to participate on my own. I don't remember how many comments I wrote before anybody replied or addressed me directly for any reason, but it was more than a few. That wasn't because I was being excluded, it was because I hadn't been speaking up long enough to be remembered by anyone, and it wasn't like I was saying anything mind blowing. Anyway, even if I were runnin' around saying awesome shit all damn day (which I assure you has never happened), it would be both presumptuous and more than a little childish to assume I'd receive some kind of benediction for gracing this place with the glow of my incandescent presence.

On the whole, this site draws a pretty great crowd. There's just a higher calibre of contributor around here, so witty and insightful commentary is considered normal -- even expected -- and thus rarely praised for its own sake. Being generally interesting and entertaining won't earn anyone an automatic, "You are both a joy and a delight!" because this isn't goddamn kindergarten, and it's nobody's job to swan about reinforcing self esteem.

Yes, some of us have built history with each other, but we established the relationships we have by participating. We had conversations and we got to know each other, because more than anything else, this site is a community. The idea of community does not always indicate exclusivity, and someone's failure to participate is neither the fault nor the responsibility of any member of the community. To feel included, you simply need to include yourself.

In other words, just speak up so we can get to know you. And promptly defile you, because we're filthy. And usually drunk. Like Amish kids at rumspringa.

Posted by: Sarina at September 1, 2009 3:59 AM

Definitely another Paheeba Day!

I'm sad to hear about that the music sections will be gone. I didn't always comment, but I appreciated the reviews and exposure to new artists and genres. I hope that this won't deter you guys from tackling anything music related, though. TK's article about Pump Up the Volume's soundtrack and Chris Polley's Budding Film Composers article were really solid and showed a way of exploring music topics while keeping it related to movies.

Two Truths and a Lie doesn't bug me. It just seems like another way of dressing up trade news. I think I preferred the Trailer Offs more than I like the Trailer Appreciations.

I would definitely like to see more Underappreciated Gems, Hangover Theater, Pajiba Blockbusters, Real-time reviews, Trash TV, and LOST Recaps. The first three especially seem to have been replaced by more trade news.


I miss Boozehound's articles, but I understand that he has other things to attend to for now. The Pajiba Guides are gold and while I like the nightly comment diversions, I can see how it can become daunting to find new topics. The Cannonball Read reviews have been interesting, but I also miss the regular book reviews from Jennifer McKeown, Sarina, Nicole, etc.

SLW and Drew have been great additions and I look forward to more of their writing. The Tarantino retrospective was really interesting and doing more of those in the future about the body of work of other directors or actors would make me happy in the pants.

Posted by: jM at September 1, 2009 4:38 AM

Drew Morton is presently killing it.

Second that.

Posted by: alphawhiskey at August 31, 2009 11:06 PM

I'll third it, assuming you mean it in a good way.

Indeed I did.

Posted by: sansho1 at September 1, 2009 4:41 AM

As for the cliquishness -- generally, most comments sections of any length have an on-topic string and an off-topic string. Sometimes you have to just talk past the rhetorical flexing in order to get the on-topic string started -- but if you like to talk about movies, the opportunity is definitely here.

Speaking as someone who's here primarily for the staff content, I used to get frustrated at how quickly a comment thread would devolve when I felt I had something pertinent to say, or some good on-topic comments by others were getting swamped. But you just gotta stick your nose in.

Posted by: sansho1 at September 1, 2009 4:58 AM

Ah, well. I suppose I took the remark out of context. My apologies.

SLW's reviews and retrospectives I really like. Drew's, not so much.

As for non-opinion based items, I would like to see Cannonball Read given its own section on the site. Maybe make it easier to track an individual's reviews.

Posted by: alphawhiskey at September 1, 2009 6:26 AM

For you, Sarina


Cardinal Bierce II:
Carefully puts on shades. Stands and raises hands.

"Blessed are the posters, for their incandescence.

Now, the Godtopus of snark and scathing grant you to be likeminded, one toward another, to celebrate thine own taste and preserve thy standards Yea even from films with 'splodey sparkley robot-boobs.

Godtopus preserve thee in thy posting and in thy lurking. Be ye on-point, or off. And grant you bile.

Congregation:
"Whiskybabyninjastar."

Cardinal Bierce II:
"Besotted are the Pajibans. And besotted are the posters, most molested of the great mollusk, who make me happy in my pants.

Congregation:
"Whiskybabyninjastar."

Cardinal Bierce II:
"Now, someone pass me a cocktail."

Congregation
"Whiskybabyninjastar."

Posted by: BierceAmbrose at September 1, 2009 6:30 AM

I have a love/hate relationship with "Two Truths and a Lie" because the world would be a much better place if all those posts were filthy lies. But the guessing is fun, and I'm sure there will be no shortage of crappy ideas to use.

Prisco's reviews of the Air Bud movies were hysterical. There have got to be other series of movies that could use the same treatment, even if the cost to the reviewer is pretty high. I know there are 7 Howling movies, and at least 4 Leprechaun movies. How has the Howling not been rebooted anyway? Someone call Rob Zombie!

I may have to suck it up and get a blog if there is a second round of cannonball read.

Posted by: Mrcreosote at September 1, 2009 6:49 AM

It warms my cold, gnarly, zomboid heart to see all these kind comments about the music section. As Sean said, it was an honour to take part.

I'd like to concur with the comments about how good it would be to have more reviews of classics - by which I don't mean Ghostbusters; perhaps they could be defined as films whose director and actors are all dead, something like that.

I agree with Sofia's comments, generally, about Pajiba being a wonderful place to come to read. So, er, listen to her.

Posted by: Caspar at September 1, 2009 7:00 AM

How about review by request. We say the title of a film we want reviewed (possibly in a comment diversion)but has not been covered by the site, and you guys can review it for us.

Posted by: returnofthesmith at September 1, 2009 7:26 AM

I have loved loved LOVED Steven Lloyd Wilson's stuff. Getting to read more in-depth reviews of my beloved Doctor Who and Torchwood makes my freaking day.

Ditto, ditto, ditto.

Drew Morton is presently killing it.

Double ditto.

And to pile on yet again, I submit that those feeling on the outs only need jump in.

Posted by: Cindy at September 1, 2009 7:48 AM

I tend to skim the pajiba front page for thing's I'm interested. I pretty religiously read Pajiba Love and movie reviews of movies that I've just seen (new or older).

I usually skip over the music reviews--not because of the quality of writing; I'm just one of those people who gets nothing out of music reviews unless I have the album in question)--and the trailers because I've usually already seen whatever's being featured over on Oh No They Didn't.

My only real suggestion would be to consolidate a lot of the stories into one article like Pajiba Love. I know you probably want to update as new movies info comes out, but it makes the cite seem cluttered.

Posted by: Claire at September 1, 2009 8:23 AM

Even as I write this I know it wont happen, but I for one get frustrated by the sheer amount of space the ads and banners take up. Like I say I know it probably wont change, and I DO understand that they're neccesary financially, but it makes for a grrr inducing view not to mention the steadily increasing load times for the site(its not just my computer either, I'm sending this from another computer in a different part of the city entirely and it's still a slow loading SOB
Otherwise I like it as it is =D

Posted by: Nadine at September 1, 2009 8:39 AM

Um, no shit I can comment on whatever I want, when I want, how I want. This is the internet. No one needs a permission slip.

I was talking about some of the obvious inside jokes from the night before in actually stories and comments (and I believe Jen was, as well).

But, hey, thanks for ironically jumping all over people's comments in a suggestion box in order to prove your point that all comments are accepted.

No one was attacking baby announcements, the tribute to Pink, or the oft hilarious hijankings... I can't officially speak for Jen, but I know I was speaking specifically about news pieces and sometimes reviews that directly reference comments that you may not get if you hadn't read a trade news piece comment section from two days prior.

*knocks on the ceiling* Hey, TPTB, what's the point of having a suggestion box if we're going to get attacked for our suggestions? Couldn't you just say (and I assume you eventually will), "Meh?"

Posted by: Kayanne at September 1, 2009 8:44 AM

Pajiba kicks ass. My only problem with it is that I tend to post comments reeeaaalllly late into any discussion, but that's the fault of my work schedule, not Pajiba. And as much as I love the site, I'm not willing to post from home where I only have dial-up and it takes ten minutes to load one page.

Pajiba Love brings me joy every day--never get rid of it. I never understood the appeal of Boozehound Cinema, not being a drinker, but that's why I skip it; I wouldn't suggest getting rid of it given how many others love it.

I would love to see reviews of So You Think You Can Dance, given how enthusiastic others have also been for the show, but I'm guessing that if Pajiba had to write reviews for a show every time someone asked, the site would crash.

And stop whining about the clique thing, folks. I started posting because I wanted to join in on the fun; I never felt like I would be mocked and pointed at as an "outsider". Basically you're just a block of text on a screen; no one knows who you really are, so there's nothing to be shy about. Just stay away from rape jokes and wishing AIDS on people, and you'll do fine.

Posted by: DeadBessie at September 1, 2009 8:48 AM

Suggestion: Get Drew Morton to do an "alternate take" review of Inglourious Basterds.

In fact, get more than one opinion on any given movie as much as possible. I'd like to see Dan Carlson's view AND The Prisco Kid's view on, say, Moon. Or Public Enemies. Etc.

Posted by: ben at September 1, 2009 8:52 AM

My suggestions:

Bring back Ranylt. I may be in the minority but I miss her reviews.

More book reviews/book guides other than the Cannonball Read. As a CR participant I like reading the reviews, but I also miss the semi-regular book suggestions from the Pajiba staffers.

I like the idea of a film theory column.

More TV recaps in addition to Lost. Off the top of my head I'd suggest Mad Men, True Blood, Weeds, 24, Sons of Anarchy, and Rescue Me. Or at least somewhere the fans can comment on the episodes because I know all these shows are not for everyone.

I think I've suggested this before but when there is a remake announced I think it would be cool to have a review of the original movie in question.

I also agree with the idea of posting comment diversions earlier. I'm usually off the internet by 6pm ET for the day so I'm always late to them.

Posted by: TylerDFC at September 1, 2009 8:57 AM

RE: the clique....

I call bullshit. I can remember when there were like 12 people who commented on this sight. Now...I can't even keep track of all the handles I see, and it's fucking awesome. SPEAK UP! I have met TK, Dustin, Julie, Nicole, Stacey, Prisco, Kamikaze Feminist, Lizzie, Genny, Mr. Creosote, Mr. Seth Fry-lock...god I can't remember the rest... Anyhow, i have met numerour 'Jibans in real life as a result of this site and consider every one of them to be the coolest motherfuckers on the face of the planet. We all have a common bond and that's what made it so rad. We have tall kids, fussy kids, kids with dready locks, black kids, white kids, even kids who look like jocks (seriously...Rowels looks like a frat-boy) love reviews. Pajiba reviews! Re-views...kids...love...to...reeeeeaaaaad!

By definition, a 'clique' is an exclusive circle of people with a common purpose. Aren't we all here for the same purpose? My point is, we are definitely a clique. A clique of thousands of people. Some come. Some go. Some cum all overt the place. But no matter what...we're all accepted. Using the word 'clique' is a weak-ass move. Because there's nothing anyone does to exclude any one person. Go up to any other group of strangers anywhere...and see if you'd be as welcome.

I dunno about everyone else, but I feel like Pajiba is part of my every day. i feel like a minority share holder of a company that's customer-centric and if i have a problem with the CEO (Suck it Rowels!) i can call him on it or make a suggestion and he'll consider it.

We all hold a share...it's just your option whether or not you'de like to exercise it.

Viva Pajiba!!!

Posted by: PissBoy at September 1, 2009 9:06 AM

err...Rowles.

Posted by: PissBoy at September 1, 2009 9:08 AM

How has the Howling not been rebooted anyway? Someone call Rob Zombie!

Posted by: Mrcreosote at September 1, 2009 6:49 AM

You just shut your suck, good sir!

Posted by: PissBoy at September 1, 2009 9:11 AM

Rowles if I’m not mistaken I told you long ago that fucking music column wouldn’t last. Music is so personal it can not be distilled down into a three paragraph post like your so called music critics have been doing.

I also think that book club of yours is dying a slow death, a book club, really? On a good day every goddamn book review here has gotten about seven comments, not quite the stampede you were hoping for.

Listen buddy, stick to your strengths. Rowles you do movies, that’s why I come to read the wonderful reviews. Most companies fail when they go outside of their mission statement, when I go to Burger King I go for the burgers, not for no fucking cobb salad.

Posted by: Guess Who! at September 1, 2009 9:28 AM

I swore off the music posts when I realized that the writers rarely wrote about music I had heard of, and 2) when I saw that they tended to slam or at least marginalize older acts and performers. In other words they just weren't writing to me.

As far as the other content on the site, I pretty much like everything and hope you don't cut any of it. Each reviewer is a better writer than what I find in mags and newspapers, even when I don't agree with the opinion (you thought Wanted was good, seriously?). You never know which items are going to evolve (devolve) in the comments section into some kind of free-for-all.

So without removing content, I would enjoy even more TV content (especially recaps). I realize that you don't necessarily need this place to become TWoP, but I think there is room for another running recap series or two from Rescue Me, Californication, Dexter, 30 Rock, FNL, Mad Men and the like.

I've enjoyed the return of EE but I do understand how it might reinforce the "cliquey" perceptions. figgy has done a good job selecting the some of the best comments, but because a handful of you are just too damn funny, the same names appear often and it could appear to some to be the "cool kids fellatio hour". I don't know how to fix this, since Pajiba doesn't need to be some affirmative action social experiment.

Posted by: ed newman at September 1, 2009 9:30 AM

So we who are complaining about the clique are told repeatedly here that our opinion about it is wrong? Seriously guys? It's not all in our heads or else we'd have just jumped in by now.

My point is a larger one -- the readership for the site, which is presumably what keeps it running via the aggressive advertising, will not grow as it could if the community weren't choking out other opinions. A casual reader who stops by will likely feel overwhelmed as far as the comments section goes.

There should be a middle ground for people who don't want to live here but want to say something.

Posted by: Caroline at September 1, 2009 9:37 AM

MORE HANGOVER THEATRE!!!(and underappreciated gems)

Posted by: David at September 1, 2009 9:48 AM

Again, if you want to say something on this site, JUST SAY IT. I honestly don't get what the problem is. There's a lot of comments? You see a lot of the same names? That's a GOOD thing. Should we put restrictions on how many comments one person can post every day so you can feel a little more special?

Like someone else already said, this isn't kindergarten--no one's going to hold your hand, spend hours coaxing you into posting your opinion and then shower you with roses when you actually do it. And no one's going to re-enact the last scene of "Invasion of the Body Snatchers" where they all scream and point at the interloper in their midst when you do comment.

Posted by: DeadBessie at September 1, 2009 10:01 AM

So we who are complaining about the clique are told repeatedly here that our opinion about it is wrong?

I think what people are saying is: Jump the fuck in - the ocean is big and there's room for everyone. If you want to be a part of a community, participate. If you want to stand outside and smoke, then do that. Jesopus ain't into cliques; he loves all Pajibans like he loves his transgendered self.

Posted by: Cindy at September 1, 2009 10:15 AM

Ok, I jumped the gun a little when I commented so early last night. Yep, it’s true: I didn’t think it through before I opened my mouth.

Add me to the people pile for lovin’ Drew. His reviews are fantastic and he sticks around for the comments. That makes him incredibly brave or incredibly stupid. Either way, keep him. I may or may not have developed a leeedle bit of a crush on Drew and his reviews.

Well said Sofia! I didn’t lurk for long, take that how you like, I jumped right in with my two cents (or more). Has a statue been erected in my honour? Hardly. Has that kept me from posting? Nope. Granted, I’m still a little gun shy. But practice makes perfect. I think Sarina said something similar (I’m not going to search for it, sorry, no time. Otherwise I would quote) if you continue to be an outsider, you are going to feel like one. Or something like that.

I love the Weekend Hi-jacks and think an official diversion is a fantastic idea! I also like the daily diversion but they go up late in my time zone, so I usually don’t get to take part till the next day.

Oh boy, I missed a lot. Real time reviews sound fun. I read a bit of the Boozehound and would like to see his return.

Posted by: Eyvi at September 1, 2009 10:19 AM

I like Two Truths and a Lie.

I miss Boozy, but I know that can't be helped.

I miss afternoon comment diversions.

And anyone who feels that this place has turned into a clique, please feel free to sit by me. I have cookies.

Posted by: Julie at September 1, 2009 10:24 AM

Posted by: BierceAmbrose at September 1, 2009 6:30 AM

As it was, is and ever shall be, Pajiba without end, amen.
---
"So we who are complaining about the clique are told repeatedly here that our opinion about it is wrong? Seriously guys? It's not all in our heads or else we'd have just jumped in by now."

But Caroline, luv, you ARE jumping in now, and that's what we want you fresh meats to do. It's like ... OK, it's like, a bunch of us are frolicking in a swimming pool, drinking and ass-grabbing, and you're standing on the side saying, "Geez, I dunno, that water looks pretty cold and uninviting," and we say, "Hey, come on in, Caroline, the water's fine! Look at us! We're having a blast! And you've got some damn fine cans there [leer], and what can we get you to drink?" and you say, "So my opinion about how the water looks is wrong? Screw you people."

Can you see what's wro ... um, uncorrect about that?

Posted by: , (TCFKAB) at September 1, 2009 10:24 AM

I know that you guys need to fund this website, but the pop up ads piss the hell out of me. And the ads where you have to click them closed in order to look at a column... Every. Single. Time.

Also, I use my university's super fast internet connection to view pajiba, and I still have to wait for the page to load. Of course, that might not necessarily be due to ads but because of the 5000 comments per column that are sometimes left. It's annoying. How about an option to click on an icon to open the comments so that those of us who would just prefer to read the article are spared having to wait?

Posted by: Natalie at September 1, 2009 10:28 AM

Heh, Cindy, didn't intentionally steal your swimming analogy, just takes me a long time to comment when I have to clean up all my tpos. ...

See what I mean?

Typos.

Posted by: , (TCFKAB) at September 1, 2009 10:29 AM

I miss both Ranylt and Ted...I know they'll be back eventually so I'm just biding my time, and I'll be so tickled when they reappear.

Let's see, what else? More TV Whore, please. More real-time reviews. More television recaps (I'll even volunteer to do a show). I'm all for another Paheeba Day, and this time I may even be able to participate since chances are I won't be giving birth on that day again this year.

Other than that I'm pretty happy. It's taken me a while to get used to the changes that were made last year, and I don't get to read or comment nearly as much as I used to, but I'll always love Pajiba and everyone here. Keep up the good work.

Posted by: Kolby at September 1, 2009 10:29 AM

No worries bucdaddy...except - hey, is the murdertank amphibious?

Posted by: Cindy at September 1, 2009 10:46 AM

Proposed changes sound coolio to me.

RE 2 truths and a lie: I never read it. I honestly don't even know what it is, but the title does not intrigue.

And I don't really care about the comment diversions, either. I'll click on one every now and then, but mostly, unless it's about movies or TV, I don't read it.

I never read the music reviews, for reasons I think I've already voiced. And I've never once clicked on a trailer appreciation post. I'm sure they're amusing, it may be a function of there being only so many hours in the day, but there's so much stuff now, I don't have time to read it all. And I agree that a review of well-known "classics" seems kinda pointless. Unless it's part of an overall theme, like "5 Underappreciated Zombie Movies" or something like that.

RE "cliquishness" - Um, I think the comments on such are kinda valid, but the in jokes and whatnot do not keep me from commenting if I want to. I do stop reading comments, however, if they get too off-topic. Comment threads are by their nature free-form, sometimes they go off on tangents, which can be amusing until the comments, some of them sexual in nature, become tiresome. I'm not a prude, I don't have a problem with off-color comments at all, but if people wanna get their virtual swerve on, could you take it offline or to another forum? I don't wanna scroll through 20 comments about someone's tits or ass to get to something interesting. So I don't, I just leave. It's not just Pajiba, I find this crap annoying on other sites as well. I'm not saying it's terribly common on here, but when I do see it, it always annoys.

And as long as I'm bitching, and since you asked, I've always disliked that "Eloquents" thing. The self-reverential name and the whole idea. I'm probably in the minority on that.

Posted by: Slash at September 1, 2009 10:50 AM

Seriously, no one gets the irony of this?

Seriously?

Stick a fork in me, y'all.

Posted by: Kayanne at September 1, 2009 10:51 AM

I do also like the real-time reviews.

Posted by: Slash at September 1, 2009 10:54 AM

I really do like this site quite a bit. I appreciate that the community that formed around it is given a chance to express their opinions even if those aren't necessarily popular ones. I still think it would be great to see more of a focus on reviews. Drew Morton is my favorite addition to the site as he isn't even reviewing the films coming out that week. Seeing someone else grapple with Rosemary's Baby or Jackie Brown is refreshing.

Maybe there could be some DVD reviews added in. Go over what the special features are, what bonuses are included, how well the film works on a small scale, and whether or not it's worth actually picking up rather than just quoting from older reviews to announce the arrival in stores. There could even be a post going through some notable releases of older films on DVD. It could even be a themed article exploring a filmmaker's or actor's or composer's output and how you can see it. Otherwise, I've nothing to suggest.

I can speak on the fear of diving in, though. While I posted the occasional comment on the site when I first found out about it, I wouldn't consider myself a regular. I came for smart, sometimes funny, film reviews that seemed to mostly fall in line with my own viewing habits. What drug me out of my shell was the comment diversion/contest in which we were given the task of defending a film we loved in spite of knowing it was horrible. I threw my wit into the arena and received some positive feedback. I felt welcomed and even managed to get mentioned in the winner announcement article as a worthy attempt.

However, there are times when, as a newer member of the site all that time ago, I was treated like I was some kind of idiot who drifted in off of a Google search and a whim. I recall being ripped to shreds for defending a film that the majority of the population here assumed would be horrific (it was mediocre with one solid performance, but that's beside the point). I explained my position quite clearly and was told that in claiming the film was good, I somehow expressed the opinion that I wanted Jessica Simpson to win an Oscar; she was not in nor connected to the film or my choice of words in any coherent way. It was insulting and I stopped commenting for a few months.

There's no way to control this bizarre community and the propensity for mockery and aggressive retaliations outside of comment moderation, and I don't think that's actually an option aside from April Fools Day. Perhaps one day someone will invent a device capable of transferring acerbic wit or bitter sarcasm in a clear way on the Internet. A guy can dream.

For the people afraid of diving in, just do it. Even if, like me for the most part, you stand as a lone fallen tree with no one to hear you through the octopus-festooned orgy brought out by a shirtless picture of Ryan Reynolds, eventually someone will notice you. Someone will respond to you. And you will respond in turn. And soon you'll feel like you belong whether others actually want you here or not.

Posted by: Robert at September 1, 2009 10:55 AM

And anyone who feels that this place has turned into a clique, please feel free to sit by me. I have cookies.

*sits beside Julie* What? I love cookies.

The only suggestion I have is to bring back the "blog" reviews. Does anyone remember when we did reviews for like three blogs? I'm sort of addicted to blogs and am always looking for new ones so was thrilled when Pajiba started reviews.

And then it went away.

And Kelly was so sad.

Can we bring that back? Hell, I'll volunteer to check them out and write up reviews for them. I'm a Canadian - that makes me automatically trustworthy.

Pretty please, with Canadian maple syrup on top?

Posted by: Kelly at September 1, 2009 11:06 AM

Ok, I missed a lot of this because I was, you know, sleeping. And working this morning.

First, the Cannonball Read is coming back. Mr. Rowleseses and I are going to work out a way to centralize it here on the site. New season will be starting November 1st.

Second, I'm hoping to get more book reviews up from myself. Can't speak for Jennifer, but I'm hoping she comes along too.

Third, enough with the "clique." Just jump in already. The water's great.

Posted by: Nicole at September 1, 2009 11:14 AM

I think some people are missing the point of PART of the "clique" argument, which is: It's annoying to read an Actual Content Post with some sort of insider joke in it (or an avalanche of them), when the only way to comprehend said joke is to sift through six hundred comments on whatever other posts you may not have had the time to read during the course of the week.

(It's also off-putting to watch all you wacky cool kids jump down people's throats for pointing it out.)

Of course it's obvious, if you want to join the club that badly, you just comment, dammit. What I thought people were talking about was when the commentary bleeds into the content, to the point where one can't just casually browse the site without feeling like you're missing the joke all the time.

My perception is that it doesn't happen very often, and when it does, I personally decide whether I want to track down the gag everyone is giggling about, or if I want to go do something IRL-related. But it happens enough that I knew what the OP was talking about. And since this is a suggestion thread, it seems a valid point to raise.

Posted by: viodonna at September 1, 2009 11:15 AM

I'm a Canadian - that makes me automatically trustworthy.

And posibly of French descent. Which means you could be a ninny. Which means you might not be trustworthy. Bring us beer and bacon. And show us what a British Columbian looks like.

Like...are they tan, with piercing blue eyes, great hips, But love treacle and have smiles that look like they snack on brick sandwiches?

Posted by: PissBoy at September 1, 2009 11:15 AM

With respect, TCFKAB, it's more like Caroline is saying "Actually, you guys seem to have loads of inside jokes and constantly reference things that I have no clue about, because I didn't refresh the last 6 comment threads before coming here, so I might just go swim somewhere else for now" and you say "No no, it's fine, really, we'll be totally welcoming and love you like jM loves panda! Also, tits reference!"

For what it's worth, I think Kayanne has it right. There's a line between this place being a community that has its own touchstones and reference points, and every article descending into the same handful of people talking amongst themselves, and I think Pajiba definitely spends a lot of its time straddling the middle ground between those two. This being a 'Suggestions' thread and all, it seems like a reasonable place for people to bring it up without being told "stop whining" or "boo-hooing" or that it's all in their heads. Which isn't to say that all of the comments in response to the suggestions of clique-y-ness have been bad; who wouldn't want some of Julie's cookies? But that...if you think of Pajiba as being like a giant party with everyone invited, if someone new shows up and says "I feel a bit out of place, and it feels like there's a whole group at this party that I'm very much not a part of", there's a nice way and a less nice way to try to help them past it.

Posted by: Shay at September 1, 2009 11:27 AM

*hugs vidonna*

Your beauty, intelligence, grace and understanding knows no bounds.

The rest of you can suck the ear wax out of your listening ears.

Posted by: Kayanne at September 1, 2009 11:27 AM

Dammit I'm huggin' Shay, too!

Posted by: Kayanne at September 1, 2009 11:29 AM

More TV reviews please. Someone (sorry, too lazy to go back and research who) mentioned above that we don't want to become TWoP and I agree because those forum moderators are assholes, but I would like some more reviews of Friday Night Lights, Big Love, and Dexter.

And for the record I like our brand of assholes, if you will. I don't have much time to comment most days because of my work schedule and driving to see the boyfriend, but if something strkes my fancy I will comment and I accept that some times I will be out of the loop because of that absence.

Oh, and I miss the Boozehound too.

Posted by: Austin asking for trouble at September 1, 2009 11:29 AM

Like...are they tan, with piercing blue eyes, great hips, But love treacle and have smiles that look like they snack on brick sandwiches?

Obviously we have met. Were you that guy in the bar trying desperately to find a girl who was drinking a lighter beer than you? God, you were so cute.

I can totally offer/whore out gifts of beer and bacon if it'll bring back the blog reviews though. Hell, I'll even throw in some moose steaks to barbeque and a Canadian goose to poop on your lawn.

Posted by: Kelly at September 1, 2009 11:32 AM

Hmmm...I've met some of you heathens, and I'm FB friends with a bunch of you (some I can't even identify on Pajiba), and occasionally I still feel like an outsider and don't get all the references not only in comments, but in the articles themselves.
It was a bit daunting in the beginning, made somewhat more so by a piece of my personal history being known to folks here before I even started lurking on a regular basis. It's also a lot to live up to when you're primarily known for being attached to one of the more witty/snarky Eloquents on the site. Would I be accepted? Would I be perceived as witty enough? What the hell is a murdertank?
But then I got my head out of my ass and jumped in. And when I didn't understand something, I asked. Commenters answered, patiently.
Perhaps they liked my handle. Perhaps it's because I have a glorious rack. Or perhaps, it's because I stopped worrying and started commenting...irregularly at best, nothing profound, and occasionally about poo. Whatever the reason, the 'jibans took me in. Simply because I clicked Post Comment.

Posted by: Whorish Mouth at September 1, 2009 11:43 AM

RE Robert: "However, there are times when, as a newer member of the site all that time ago, I was treated like I was some kind of idiot who drifted in off of a Google search and a whim."

Yeah, I've seen this happen a few times. I don't like it. People shouldn't do it. But it is "scathing reviews for bitchy people." They kind of warn you up at the top.

It helps to not really give a shit what anyone else thinks. I don't. It's very freeing. I understand if not everyone can be as callous as me, but keep in mind, many of these people are kinda young. Some of them think insulting other people's choices are how you establish cultural bona fides. Whatever. I don't take this shit personally. If other people agree with me, cool, if they don't, that's cool too.

Posted by: Slash at September 1, 2009 11:48 AM

Which isn't to say that all of the comments in response to the suggestions of clique-y-ness have been bad; who wouldn't want some of Julie's cookies? But that...if you think of Pajiba as being like a giant party with everyone invited, if someone new shows up and says "I feel a bit out of place, and it feels like there's a whole group at this party that I'm very much not a part of", there's a nice way and a less nice way to try to help them past it.

Seriously: my cookies are awesome. Because I take credit after my roommate bakes them.

Also, I completely understand your last statement. People who are new to the site probably read the comments and think "Wait...panda rape? Shouldn't we be discussing the intricasies of 'splosions in a Michael Bay movie? Because that scene in Con Air where the airplane hangar blows the fuck up is an allegory for the injustices in our healthcare system and I need to explore that theme further."

I just hope new people continue to comment. I like new people. I am SO TIRED of Nicole.

Posted by: Julie at September 1, 2009 11:48 AM

Perhaps it's because I have a glorious rack.

YES.

Posted by: Julie at September 1, 2009 11:50 AM

I didn't read all of these, but I was thinking something along the lines of a "VS" type article. Think like "Siskel and Ebert." Where two writers argue on their perspectives of a film. For example, Dustin hates straight gore horror, have him saw, do a review of Saw against someone who loved it. Note that was just an example.

Posted by: Deistbrawler at September 1, 2009 11:53 AM

Just chiming in, momentarily, to note that I am still reading the suggestions (thanks for the feedback!), and some of these have already been factored in. For one, The Boozehound will be back mid-month(!). As Nicole mentioned above, Cannonball Read will also return, and now be hosted on this site. With Pajiba Music gone, TK will be able to focus his attention to Blockbusters, Hangover Theaters, and Gems, and we're also continuing our Films of 1999 series. TV reviews will return when TV shows return, this fall. I'd like to add another recap series, in addition to "Lost," but we'll have to figure out which one. I'm currently working on the weekend hijack threads -- those should become a regular feature. And I know some of you like the Real Time Reviews, in theory, but the page views generally don't support that, in practice. We'll see what we can do there. Oh, and neither Drew or Steven are going anywhere, hopefully for a long time.

Now: As far as the cliquish quibbles. There's not too much we can do about it. However, I completely understand the complaints about referencing comments/commenters in the news/reviews. I really try to refrain from doing that (as do the majority of the writers), except for the community building posts (EE's, comment diversions). In order to increase participation below the comment line, it's often important for us to limit ourselves to above the comment line. I hear that. It's also why a lot of us don't comment often, which doesn't mean we don't read the comments. We just like to keep the two spheres separate.

Posted by: Dustin Rowles at September 1, 2009 12:09 PM

Urban Pajibanary
I love the community vibe around these parts and I've been a constant reader/occasional commenter for about 3 years now, but sometimes I miss jokes and references too. What about a FAQs section where some of the most common jokes and references are explained? i.e. Godopus, the Murkertank, Alabama Pink, Pookie's banning, etc. At least then newer folks can keep up. Maybe it could be like our own Urban Pajibanary.

Commenter Profiles
On that vein, would there be a way to let posters have profiles? Cause my memory is wretched and I can't remember who's who sometimes since there are so many commenters, and I think that would help with the community vibe. Maybe this would be hella hard to accomplish.

Reviews
Contentwise, I LOVE the reviews of older movies and classics. Sometimes I find movies I'd missed out on, and sometimes I get to comment on old favorites. There's not much to look forward to in the current Hollywood offerings.

Retrospectives & Critiques
I'd love to continue to get critiques of genres and classic movies, but can we have someone else in addition to Drew do these too? I can't handle Drew's writing style which means I skip out on his reviews, but I would love to have another perspective on these. I thought Jeremy C. Fox and Steven Lloyd Wilson's reviews are in-depth and intelligent, without being self-referential and pretentious.

Trailer Appreciation can go.

Posted by: Vee at September 1, 2009 12:13 PM

I want nekkid pictures of Dustin Rowles, covered in Crisco....not Prisco, although the latter would definitely be interesting from a 'Gee...that smile says Dustin sure is enjoying this a little too much' perpspective as I imagine a nekkid Dustin covered in Prisco would have a smile on his face more brilliant than the one plastered on a retard watching me jingle my car keys. Make is happen Rowles.

/end suggestion

Posted by: PissBoy at September 1, 2009 12:21 PM

Just chiming in, momentarily, to note that I am still reading the suggestions (thanks for the feedback!), and some of these have already been factored in.

Oh God, he didn't mention the blog reviews. Dammit. Despite my perfectly Canadian pleading we're not going to get those back, I just know it.

*sobs brokenly into her Tim Horton's coffee cup*

Posted by: Kelly at September 1, 2009 12:24 PM

I loved it when y'all added the preview of the comments. No more shall I leave* and italic tag all by its lonesome. So, my suggestion is technical:

People are always bitching about spoilers. So, why not create a spoiler tag for the reviews? Anything encompassed in the tag is hidden unless the person chooses to expand it. Then, if the reviewers use it correctly, people can't complain because they fuckin' clicked on it. It couldn't be that hard(I don't know shit about web design).

Speaking of design: why does it take me upwards of one minute to see my comment actually posted? Seriously, I send you text, you post it. What's with the delay?

Oh, and, uh, cut Two Truths and a Lie, Pajiba Love, Cat Poster...uh, Completely Random Lists like "Everything I needed to know I learned from...". I suppose I could never sway you into cutting Pajiba Love, but cut that Two Truths bullshit. Oh, and William Gnoss's little comedy bits where the agent calls the other agent are horrendous, and basically lead to the exact same "Fuck you! Don't give them any ideas! Murdertank, y'all!" comment threads. They don't fit into any sort of reviews, really.

* - What are the fucking escape characters? What if I want to type ""? Seriously, it's like S&M without the safe word.

Posted by: pissant at September 1, 2009 12:24 PM

The only way it's a clique is if you choose to keep yourself on the outside.

Once a month, somebody needs to review a porn based on an actual film. Dead serious. It needs to happen. Yesterday.

The thing Prisco did with the Dennys menu was fucking brilliant and got a shitload of ridiculously funny comments. It don't have to be weekly, but columns like that are fried gold, hombre... Same with the Movie Mash-up columns. If you do them weekly, they'll run out of juice relatively quick - once or twice a month, max.

Score some more interviews. Even if it ain't somebody necessarily "famous". Shit, talk to a Key Grip from Harold & Kumar, hit him with some questions, and let him in on the comments. Better yet, let us know a week or two in advance and pick the questions from the commenters.

A monthly video game review would be decent.

Kill Conrad.

Point-Counterpoint. Person A loves it. Person B hates it.
Let everyone get into a giant race war over it.

Hire Tucker Max. Let us at him...

Posted by: Skitz at September 1, 2009 12:25 PM

Vee: Pajiba Dictionary, all ready for ya :)

http://www.pajiba.com/guides/the-official-pajiba-dictionary.php

Posted by: Julie at September 1, 2009 12:26 PM

When I first came upon this site I was quickly recruited to become a member of the pajiba “clique.” I had to quit because I found it to be very limiting. Now I ride alone, the burden of trying to carry a group became too taxing.

It is not that cliques are a bad thing, personally I don’t think pajiba has cliques.

P.S. Kayanne, as far as someone sticking a fork in you, I’ll stick something in you but it wont be a fork.

Rowles, one mistake you made was letting Figgy take over the EE gig. Now don’t get wrong, Figgy is a very talented gal but the EE gig must be earned, not just given to someone. The EE is one of the cornerstones of pajiba. Figgy doing EE is like Lucille Ball doing porn, yeah Lucille is funny and shit. But do you really want to see her doing porn?

Posted by: Guess Who! at September 1, 2009 12:35 PM

I think that trailer appreciation can be done without.

For sure we need more TV columns.

As for the exclusivity of the commentors. I have been reading for a couple of years (I didn't make my way down the comments until recently though) and even though I am technically a 'lurker' I feel like a part of the community and I get most of the 'inside jokes'. I have probably only commented about 5 times but I never felt as though I was discouraged from it. Usually I just felt like most of what needed to be said already was and as for the off-color stuff, I have always enjoyed it even if I wasn't participating.
Although there was that one bit with the maple syrup with Admin but he never got back to me on that...

Posted by: Jilly at September 1, 2009 12:35 PM

Ooooo I love the porn idea!!!!

As for the cliquey thing- I've been reading and posting here for close to three years. I'm not a newbie. But damn if I feel like my Pajiba has gotten to be full of inside jokes that I'm no longer a part of...no one to blame for that except myself (and my damn job).

Where does BSlim fall in all of this? Did I miss his comment somewhere?

Posted by: Be Adequite! at September 1, 2009 12:36 PM

Thanks Julie! I knew there was one somewhere. How about linking to that under the "About" section so newbies can find it easily?

Posted by: Vee at September 1, 2009 12:39 PM

...every article descending into the same handful of people talking amongst themselves...

I get the bit about the Pajiba writers including something in their pieces - but this part of the equation is what I don't get. Those people are a very welcoming group, I think. Didn't most people here start the same way, entering the known Pajibaverse?

Julie's got cookies, I've got brownies and some blueberry cheesecake bars. Pull up a chair.

Posted by: Cindy at September 1, 2009 12:39 PM

Allow for images/videos in the comments.

Posted by: Vi at September 1, 2009 12:39 PM

All carbohydrates and no protein Cindy, might I add some protein?

Posted by: Guess Who! at September 1, 2009 12:50 PM

Keep it clean Mister!

Posted by: Cindy at September 1, 2009 12:54 PM

I wouldn't mind a recurring feature on the worst movies ever made. That could be fun.

For me, thumbs up on "Two Truths and a Lie", thumbs down on "Trailer Appreciation".

Posted by: Christian H. at September 1, 2009 12:54 PM

I'd like to add another recap series, in addition to "Lost," but we'll have to figure out which one

*cough* Rescue Me.

Posted by: ashes at September 1, 2009 1:14 PM

Shoot. At work and unable to take the time to peruse through all
these Fah-boo suggestions.

Off the top of my head (and still finding my way around the site
after a scant few months).

I'd love:
-- more of that Boozehound Hangover Theatre stuff
-- more ripping on crappy movies stuff
-- how to make kick azz bbq and/smoked beast
-- dating for mid-age, agnostic, child-free, dog-goofy, reg-size wimins
-- less horror movie appreciation {not a fan. eeew}
-- tips for those who aren't 'hip' {yet. [grin]}to twizzler, farcebook,
I-Pod'n, fancy blog post, formatting cheese. help a sister out!

Have a lovely day all! ;-D

Posted by: Ms MoMo at September 1, 2009 1:19 PM

Huh, I did not see this at all until this morning. Well, I'll have to open my big mouth:
-I like Two Truths and a Lie (and I stopped cheating!)
-I'm not over fond of Trailer Appreciation (I like it in theory, and I do love trailers, but I rarely see a trailer that really sticks with me)
-More Sarina and her heathen pie-hating ways
-I love love LOVE Drew and Steven. LOVE. (I still miss Ranylt, but at least I have those two to keep me warm at night until her glorious, triumphant return.)(And they'd better stick around when she comes back.)
-I also can't wait for the Boozehound to come back
-I love the Cannonball Read, and I love reading all the different voices present when those reviews are posted. I will definitely join this year, though I'll probably be one of the slower readers.
-I love the point/counterpoint idea, that Deist and Skitz suggested. LOVE. (oooh, Drew vs. Ranylt? Come *on*!)
-I would love to see real time reviews, at least on occasion. I realize they can be lengthy, but if you put one up, say, one a month, we could still have them without taking up too much space.
-I am all about Paheeba Day being a regular (perhaps annual?) event. I do think weekly might be pushing it. But I think it's a lovely way to commemorate our beloved Pink, to give our girly sides a chance to come out, and to throw some guest voices in the mix, which is always fun. Not that anything is wrong or bad about it, but most of the writers here are of the male species, and it's great to have a day of feminine perspectives. Like a treat.

Well, that's my $.02. Geezum sasquatch, I sure do talk a lot. Anyhoodles, changes or no, I sure do love my Pajiba. Kind of like I love my heroin.

Oh, and I'm going to disagree about the references to comment threads in the actual articles. I've seen that happen only very occasionally, and I don't think it's all that big a deal. I don't know what they reference either, sometimes. I ask, or just let it go. It's not a life-changer. Well, except for the times when it is.

Posted by: Anna von Beaverplatz at September 1, 2009 1:26 PM

Who the hell knows if anyone will read this far, but here's my two cents.

I’ve been coming to Pajiba for almost 4 years now, and still find myself in lurk mode much of the time. Mainly because I’m too busy working to keep up with some of the jokes. To this day, I have no idea where the “Godtopus” thing came from. Sometimes, there are just too many in-jokes, and you do get confused. That’s one reason I like Pajiba Love; it’s the fun of the website for people on the go. You know what I mean.

Anyway, I think Robert said it best. I have seen members get blistered for their differing opinions here, or worse, ignored altogether especially when it’s a film with a Pajiba darling in it. We can get just as “Scathing and bitchy” with each other, and it ain’t always out of love. However, it's been said, this isn’t kindergarten and no one will hold your hand. You do have to speak up and trust that your opinion will be heard.

That said, I do think it’s unfair for people to be saying that the “clique” thing is non-existent or stupid. We were all newbies once, and not everyone “jumps in” right away. Pajiba can get cliquey, all message boards do. If the same complaint is going on after a while, then clearly, it’s bothering someone.

As for what to bring back: I do miss Real Time Reviews; that's part of what got me hooked on Pajiba in the first place. Some things like EE seem geared towards the same people, while Comment Diversions & RTRs’ are something that just about everyone can enjoy.

You can ditch "Two Truths and a Lie" and Seriously Random Lists.

Posted by: Brie at September 1, 2009 1:26 PM

More trash TV! More trash TV!
Or just more TV in general. You have the movie thing very well covered, no complaints here, even on the columns I don't read all the time. But if we're losing music, we must have more TV.
I, for one, would enjoy a good skewering of a VH1 "reality" show once in awhile. Especially the ones I like. I'm looking at you, Tool Academy.

Posted by: Whorish Mouth at September 1, 2009 1:28 PM

Peeps, here is the Official Pajiba Dictionary:

Pajiba Terms

It may help with some of the questions.

And hey, Dustin, have you not made a main page link for the dictionary? I had to go hunting.

Posted by: Cindy at September 1, 2009 1:37 PM

For those who feel discouraged from posting here, witness the story of one of my new favorite commenters: "Luker" the Barbarian. I can't remember the exact details, but he came in one day, saying he was a 'luker' (a typo in his name) and voicing a contrary opinion. He was attacked (of course he was. this place has its assholes just as every other internet community does) and boy did he stand up for himself. He argued, he dove in, and he kept the name forever. And now he's a prolific and well liked commenter. so just take a page out of his book and dive in. I get keeping the inside jokes out of the posts, and I get the fear of posting. But remember: we weren't born eloquents. we all had to dive in.


As for the real suggestions: I'd love a point-counterpoint review. Someone who hates a movie/book/tv show and someone who loves it. For example, I noticed that The Corrections is a polarizing book among readers here--or at least, PStep loved it and John Williams hated it. I'd LOVE to read a conversation between the two about it.

And as much as I love the insightful reviews of great movies, I'd also love a running feature on the Worst Movies, as Christian H. Sort of a "Overappreciated Gems", but angrier. How about reviewing Razzie "winners"?

Oh, and I'd just like to add my love for Dan's reviews of The Movies of 1999. I really loved those. Could there be a feature for...The Movies of....the 30s? the 40s? Just maybe one month dedicated to one decade, and all the reviewers get to pick one movie to do. I really love reading Drew's reviews of classic movies, but I'd like to see what the other reviewers thought as well.

Guess Who, would it be way too meta to put your comment in the EE?

Posted by: figgy at September 1, 2009 1:41 PM

I'm back to suggest that the TV reviews could/should be of whatever HBO show happens to be running it's season at the time. They seem to have 12-week seasons, none of which occur at the same time, which is probably why people devour their shows so eagerly. Just a thought.

Do people really get attacked here for their comments? Seriously? I know I've been busy lately and haven't commented as much as I used to, but I've never once seen someone flamed or beaten down (not seriously anyway) for their opinions. And I think it's ridiculous to suggest that those of us who are friendly with each other all agree with each other's opnions all the time. That's bullshit. I'm not into Battlestar Galactica and I thought Iron Man was lame - and I'm not afraid to say it, and I doubt anyone else cares. For real people, they're called opinions, shout them from the rooftops, print them on 8 1/2 X 11 paper and fling them from a hot air balloon for all I care, but don't get pissed off if someone else doesn't give a rat's ass, or worse, doesn't agree.

Posted by: Kolby at September 1, 2009 1:44 PM

Just chiming in again to say I would also be very interested in some point-counterpoint type reviews.

"Jane, you ignorant slut."

Posted by: MM at September 1, 2009 1:54 PM

Once (and only once, mind you, as I love me the comments) I think it would be interesting to have a post without comments. How would Pajibans and Pajibettes react?

Posted by: coryo at September 1, 2009 2:16 PM

Whorish Mouth - Was the premiere episode of this season's Tool Academy not the greatest spectacle in the history of EVER??? I am so grabbing my popcorn every week and tuning in!

When the girls did the real-time chat of "The Hills" for last year's Paheeba Day - it made me laugh so damn hard I think I hurt myself! It might be fun to do an occasional real-time chat of a different shitty reality show with a group of people gathering to watch and comment? An open thread like with the Presidential/Vice Presidential debates or the award shows but far less classy and cerebral. Like for "Tool Academy" or "Rock of Syphilis" or anything with Tyra...

Also, to beat a dead horse, no one is saying that anyone's feelings are wrong or invalid. I think the general point that is trying to be made is that Pajiba tends to be more of a community than a lot of other sites and because of that, friendships and in-jokes are going to bleed into the content. It's bound to happen. And yes, when you're on the outside of it, I'm sure it is off-putting and confusing, but trust me when I say, it was like that for every single one of us when we first started coming here. When I first started reading, there were comments in the articles about "sandy vaginas" and the Dept. of Homeland Security taking down the site - I had no idea what any of these things were, but I didn't feel like I was being left out because other people who were here before I was were having a conversation and referencing events I wasn't a part of. I just kept reading and found something that *I* could relate to and commented on it. And I got ignored. And then I tried again. And I got ignored. And then I tried again...

Posted by: Lainey at September 1, 2009 2:17 PM

I love the idea of commenter profiles, though I'm not sure how it would work. Maybe I could work it into the EE? feature say, 5 commenters a week or whatever and they can give me the info if they want. Something like that, if the site can't find another way.

I really do try to feature non-regulars on the EE. I read EVERY comment and I love finding good ones from people I don't know so well. But it's really not my fault that admin is always so damn funny. But I'll try harder to vary the people on the list as much as I can. That's my pledge.That means you very talkative people are just gonna have to work harder for the glory...

Posted by: figgy at September 1, 2009 2:23 PM

Oh! and just because I'm reading the post right now: I'd like the answers for the Two Truths and a Lie to be posted sooner. I don't like suffering for so long.

Posted by: figgy at September 1, 2009 2:25 PM

I go back and forth on nested comments, but I'll throw it out there.

Random lists might be more interesting if you didn't title them & people had to guess. The winner (correct guess or funniest) could get a spotlight in the next list.

Posted by: Stew at September 1, 2009 2:30 PM

Ooh, I like that idea Stew.

Posted by: Julie at September 1, 2009 2:47 PM

*ignore..ignore...ignore...

Oh dang it, I'm sorry Lainey, I just can't ignore you. You're cute as a button.
And yes girl, it was a trainwreck of hilarity! Yay tools! :)

Posted by: Whorish Mouth at September 1, 2009 2:48 PM

I preferred it when the trade news came in a daily roundup (like Pajiba Love) rather than the individual posts. Many of the individual posts are titled so cryptically that I have no idea what the topic of the post is, and I don't click on them when that's the case.

And I know advertising is necessary, but I loathe the "Click to continue to site" ads. I hate them sooo much, it, it the, it, flame, flames, FLAMES on the side of my face, breathing, breathle...heaving breaths, heaving....

Posted by: Sheri at September 1, 2009 2:53 PM

One word: Gummo Tuesdays.

YES, I KNOW IT'S TWO WORDS, BUT I WAS JUST GONNA TYPE GUMMO, THEN DECIDED THAT IT SHOULD PROBABLY HAVE A DAY OF THE WEEK ATTACHED, SO IT'S NOT JUST FLOATING THERE! JESUS CRACKERBUSH, GET OFF MY FUCKING BACK ALREADY! FINE...

Two words: Gummo Tuesdays.

There. Happy now? God forbid I make a mistake, right? Cripes...

Posted by: Skitz at September 1, 2009 2:53 PM

Aren't inside jokes going to be a staple of ANY small community you wish to join? It's no different here and on other highly interactive online sites than it might be if you physically moved to a small town where the residents have mostly lived there for 30 years and know everybody else. Right? I mean, there are a couple baseball sites where I've hung out for years and I still don't get all the jokes all the time.

It's just the way it is, not just here.

Posted by: , (TCFKAB) at September 1, 2009 3:02 PM

I love the real-time reviews, and I really, really miss Boozehound. Glad he'll be back soon. I've said this before, Dustin, but I'd love to see some reviews of great British comedy, like Blackadder or Father Ted.

Trailer Appreciation never made sense to me, but I liked Two Truths and a Lie, as well as the Comment Diversions.

Posted by: Suz at September 1, 2009 3:04 PM

Right back atcha, Kayanne.

Smooches!

Posted by: viodonna at September 1, 2009 3:18 PM

I gotta say I never read a thread in which anyone was "attacked" for their unpopular opinion; mostly people seem to just try to explain things from their point of view. The only time I've witnessed attacks is when some jackass hops on the site, posts something witty and insightful like "omg, ur site is so lame," at which point he is justly ripped limb from limb.

Otherwise I've argued with people about why I like/dislike a movie, but it's never been nasty, and it makes for an interesting discussion.

Posted by: DeadBessie at September 1, 2009 3:19 PM

Thanks, Dustin I know you try and keep the stories free of yokes, but, ya know. Anyway, I appreciate the effort you fine folks put into this establishment. Thanks for letting us voice or suggestions.

Guess Who! I think I agree with you about everything. Including EE and carrying the whole clique-thang.

Yea, I used to be a lurker defender, but it just became too hard to tell people "sorry" for making you feel excluded when there were so many people complaining that it's the fault of the lurker for not being involved.

GIVE + TAKE

Posted by: Kayanne at September 1, 2009 3:21 PM

That means you very talkative people are just gonna have to work harder for the glory...

Fuck that shit. You mean to tell me the naturally funny people have to suffer so some new motherfucker can get his name on a list? And what about that money ...er, never mind.

Posted by: Cindy at September 1, 2009 3:31 PM

I gotta say I never read a thread in which anyone was "attacked" for their unpopular opinion

Really, DB you haven't read this one... Or were you not here for the election coverage? Things got nasty. And not the internet approved kind of nasty. But alas, that's politics.

Also, yay for returned hugs.

Posted by: Kayanne at September 1, 2009 3:36 PM

01. You should give out free coupons for Dairy Queen and booze.

02. Pajiban nipple slip pictorial.

03. Recipes for squash.

04. A lottery - Shirley Jackson style.

05. Every post gets commenters two cents off per gallon of gas.

06. Live-feed cockfighting.

07. "Guess Who's Poo" Thursdays.

08. Let Rowles Jr. mash the keyboard for an hour. "Type By Tots" Wednesdays.

09. "Drink & Type" Fridays - Comment = swallow. Ends when everyone blacks out.

10. "Jibadome" Two commenters enter. One gets shanked by Tyler Perry.

Posted by: Skitz at September 1, 2009 3:55 PM

Ouch. Ow, ow, ow, ow. What the ... ? I'm in ideeeeaaaaaa. This must be what having and idea feels like. Mother. Some maternal figure. It burns, itches actually ...

It seems to me that Pajiba is a little more like a mythology show than adventure of the week, and that that can be a fine economic model. The posts stand alone well enough, and also reference stuff that makes them richer. Lose that and you become USA Today and we already have one of those. Meanwhile, mythology shows - the good ones - have rabid, persistent fan bases who spend money freely on what they love.

Posted by: BierceAmbrose at September 1, 2009 4:06 PM

Adding a quota of recap columns would be a mistake. I don't think even Mad Men deserves it column. It's a good show and everything, but there are so many of them. I don't keep up. And I sure don't want to read about them.

Breaking Bad is more my cup. I don't want a recap on that one either.

Anyway, the recaps should remain dependent on the number of truly special and somewhat confounding shows are out there. I think LOST recaps are the only successful ones because of the truly special seasons 4 and 5 of the show. Even then, it's hard to pin down. I could see one on Twin Peaks. I couldn't see one happening on Veronica Mars seasons 2 or 3--so even the way goods shows change comes into play. I love Californication and 30 Rock and such, and we can mention them here in there, but I don't see the benefit of having recaps on those. I just don't see any other show deserves a recap just because some of us love it. You can go on Imdb and join the little tribes there if Top Chef, Curb Your Enthusiasm or ______ need your comments.

oh yeah, Fuck trash tv. Really go over on imdb for that shit. You deserve what you put up with over there.

And actually, not to want to add more to your real workload, but I'd like it if Drew Morton's classics reviews were less superficial.I know you'd be playing to a smaller audience, but I've seen most of the movies you've mentioned, so I don't get the benefit of you opening up the world of cinema for me. You're in film school, so please, nerd it up for us. I'm sure technicality doesn't exclude snark.

Or you can tell me to go the library. I shall, I shall.

Posted by: Jackseppelin at September 1, 2009 4:10 PM

Oh! Skitz reminded me... I forgot to mention my suggestion of a Nude Pajiba Staff Pictorial.

Posted by: Anna von Beaverplatz at September 1, 2009 4:16 PM

06. Live-feed cockfighting.

Only if you're not talking about roosters.

Posted by: MM at September 1, 2009 4:24 PM

RE Allow for images/videos in the comments.
Posted by: Vi at September 1, 2009 12:39 PM


No. Please don't do this.

Posted by: Slash at September 1, 2009 4:35 PM

You're right, Cindy. Fuck the lot of them if they can't be as funny as the regulars.

And I don't get it, Kayanne. You used to be one of the most active commenters around, and I always loved your comments. You were always the type who argued right back and didn't let anyone give you crap. And you know plenty of people here like you and miss your comments. So I don't understand why you're acting like a lurker who's afraid to comment--you were never like that before. It's not like you don't know the community. I know you had an unpleasant experience, but we've all had our fair share of people who didn't treat us nicely--I mean, this place has as many idiots as any other community. And trust me, since I've had the EE I've had a lot of nasty coming my way. It's not nice, but it's the community. You get the bad with the really nice, and most of us are nice. So I just really don't get where your particular anger is coming from.

I hope I'm not coming off bitchy there. I'm actually just kind of hurt that you of all people seem to be so angry with the regulars.

Posted by: figgy at September 1, 2009 4:40 PM

Yeah - nudity is where it's at, man. What d'you think all the hep cats are doing nowadays? Frittering around on their "computerphones"? Shit no, man - they're looking at boobs and butts and wieners and nipples and balls and people humping other people and ladies peeing on guys and short men sucking toes and slow dancing nekkid people grunting and people kissing people with their mouths open and handcuffs and goats in diapers and whips and groins and trampolines and stuff. You wanna make Pajiba a super-duper site? Here's what you gotta do to blow all that other shit outta the water: QUICK. ACCESS. TO. PERVERTED. SHIT.

Listen, you know where kids are getting all their wackadoo pervo kicks from? Do you? Truck Stops. Yeah. Truck Stop magazine racks. That's it. Unless they're lucky enough to have a Mom & Pop Pervo Porn Emporium in town, that's where they're getting their vulva fixes and pecker pics. How sad is that? That's fucking Russia sad, man. Russia sad. So here's what you do: You figure out a way to put all of that crazy, latex covered, dirty nurse, scrotum-shackled, ass-paddlin', oil-wrasslin', pig-boxing, superfly porn on computers? You're swimming with the big boys, Rowles. That's where the brass ring is nowadays. Screw print. You manage to get people to use computers for rubbing one out at three in the morning or before they pop a waffle in the toaster and you're in like Flynn. I'm telling you...

Nudity is where it's at.

Posted by: Skitz at September 1, 2009 4:40 PM

I would love to see a Pajiba guide on the 20 best films by female directors. Maybe to coincide with the 2nd coming of Paheeba day? You've got a readership, most of whom are female (Boobie wave! Everybody jiggle!) who like hearing about rad films that they might have missed out on, and I can think of no other group that needs more exposure.

As for the commenting/cool-kids-won't-let-me-play thing:

a) I read *every* comment in a post. I don't scan through looking for names of people I know/like and only read their shit. I think that goes for most people. If you write something, you're included. Congrats.

b) I get the trepidation thing. I lurked for ages. I still write comments and then delete them without posting all the time, because I decide they aren't good enough. I'm afraid too! For no reason. Don't be like me.

Remember, kids - only you can prevent thread highjacking.

Posted by: Lauren at September 1, 2009 4:57 PM

I still write comments and then delete them without posting all the time, because I decide they aren't good enough.

Hee! I still do that Lauren, and I've been commenting WAY TOO OFTEN for almost two years :)

Posted by: Julie at September 1, 2009 5:02 PM

Ooooh, I also like Robert's idea about DVD reviews! It'd be great to know if the extras/commentary are worth the purchase.

Posted by: Lauren at September 1, 2009 5:08 PM

Guess Who!, The only people who complain about cliques are the socially backwards asshats who flunked Playing Nicely With Others, 1A. These poor fools view their social exclusion as a compliment, mistakenly assuming that their permanent place on the edge of social groups makes them special. Drunk on hubris, that nectar of entitlement, they amble through life alternately whining about the ills committed against them and asserting their social ineptitude by lashing out at society in a variety of ways.

My hat is off to you, sir. You provide our humble community with an important service by standing as a prime example of the poor saps I have just described. Truly, your dedication to your life's calling is exemplary. No EE award is needed to commend you, for you have truly achieved your life's ambition. Rest assured of your singular greatness, GW!, for you have earned your solitary place in society. Be glad and rejoice, for great is your reward in the Heaven of the Social Miscreants.

Posted by: Suz at September 1, 2009 5:13 PM

I want more Wire related articles.

Currently Pajiba has only offered up reviews for the two weakest seasons (2 & 5), so reviewing the others should be a priority, then a retrospective on the series as a whole and maybe some random lists and comment diversions geared towards Bunk, McNulty, Snoop and the gang. The lack of coverage on here for the greatest TV show ever created is staggering, so more on The Wire, please!

Other then that, love the site, wouldn't change a thing.

Posted by: hh at September 1, 2009 5:14 PM

Yeah, I've missed you too, Kayanne.

Posted by: , (the commenter formerly known as bucdaddy) at September 1, 2009 5:16 PM

How about... uuuuuum.... uhhhhhhh...

OH! Got it! How about... Waitasec... Nope, it's gone. WAIT!

Yeah. Interviews. Did I already say that? Yeah? Shit. Whatever, I don't care - there are enough second (or even third & fourth) string actors/producers/directors out there who, while maybe not doing any current work, have starred in or had some part in some of our favorite movies. You think the Three Storms from Big Trouble In Little China are booked solid promoting their upcoming blockbuster(s)? Fuck & No. How cool would it be to knock out a couple of questions with Thunder, Lightning and Rain? Jesus Crackerbarrels, TK would smile the smile of a thousand suns...

How 'bout Pagoda, huh? Kumar Pallana would be awesome to chat with for a bit. Does anybody interview him? I think not. Pajiba'd be the joint for actors, actresses, producers, directors and every other "under the radar" person involved in film & television. The Kevin Smith article was dynamite, but shit holmes, the interviews are few and far between. You could do a "10 Questions With _____" once a month.

This one I'm serious about. The others? Not so much.

Except the porn knockoff reviews... The Poonies deserves to be seen. You could call the column "Whackoff Knockoff" - it sounds Russian, but screw Yakov Smirnoff...

Posted by: Skitz at September 1, 2009 5:50 PM

The porn knockoff idea sounds disturbingly intriguing.

Posted by: Suz at September 1, 2009 5:57 PM

Did I mention "more Skitz, please?" *Nude* Skitz?

Posted by: Anna von Beaverplatz at September 1, 2009 6:09 PM

I just don't like the excessive ads in here, I've gotten in trouble at work twice already because o Pajiba advertisings, once because of Pamela Anderson and again because of them wrestling chaps that I think now my boss thinks I'm kind of gay. Nothing wrong with that but hey I don't want people to think that.

I like the Two truths lies thing and the trailer apreciation is really cool. I think also that the thing where you select the best comments of the week should be different, it's too long and not funny at all, maybe you should make it shorter or at least tell people "hey, be funny!" and all.

Posted by: zito at September 1, 2009 6:16 PM

My grain of salt is that everyone surely must see how it might be hard for someone to make themselves known amongt y'all and not feel intimidated by comments or in-jokes. I don't care too much because I'm constantly fucking around on Facebook anyway and like to leave comments here mostly so as to let Pajiba know they're still doing things right - oh, and I developed a thick skin after pretty much my first music post. But some people might not see it that way, and it's not anything against any of you regulars, who are clearly all good, considerate and intelligent people. It's just that sometimes I think comments can become too self-referential and therefore off-putting. And really there's nothing to be done about that, I suppose. Nature of the beast. But the people voicing that thought in this thread aren't arseholes, is all I'm saying, and I think it's worth voicing.

Posted by: Caspar at September 1, 2009 6:24 PM

Oh yeah, and I almost forgot that also Dustin should watch The Wire.

Posted by: zito at September 1, 2009 6:28 PM

I've missed Hangover Theater. I've got a couple of suggestions for that.

When is Boozy coming back? Is Ranylt coming back?

There are asshats everywhere, people. You just have to learn to ignore the asshattery and jump in. It's what most of us do.

Posted by: Melody at September 1, 2009 6:32 PM

figs, sweetheart, babydoll, bless your little heart, this isn't an "AH EVERYONE HERE SUCKS AND I HATE YOU ALL!" rant. Seriously. I'm just trying to make a point.

There are plenty of people here that feel left out. It doesn't matter how many times you say "jump in!" there will still be people who feel like you're gonna bite. Because, and let's just be honest with ourselves here, sometimes, y'all do. This is not an attack, it's just a statement. I understand many of you love and adore this place like it's a(n even cooler) family, but people have the right to say that... well, sometimes y'all aren't familial to everybody and that is off-putting.

Pu on your big girl panties and either invite them to tea or hush. Because honestly, waving some goshdarn flag and screaming "Infidels!" does not help with the appearances that you're welcoming. True fact, y'all.

And I'm not doing this is a personal attack, figs, I'm just speaking up for the underdog, not the masses.

buc don't lie.

Posted by: Kayanne at September 1, 2009 6:50 PM

Pu on your big girl panties

I always poo on my big girl panties before I put them on. How else do you make shitpants?

(sorry, I couldn't resist the potty humour. I am technically 7.)

Posted by: Lauren at September 1, 2009 7:08 PM

Suz, you put too much emotional stock in the things I say, I’m just here for the reviews and on occasion to make wiseass comments. Please do not take me so seriously, life is too short to dwell on some silly nonsense from a guy that goes by the name “Pookie,” I mean “Guess Who!.”

Figgy I’m just breaking balls, to be honest EE couldn’t be in better hands.

There seems to be a lot of women here chiming in on the future of pajiba. I say that because all these women here and no has made me a fucking sandwich yet.

Posted by: Guess Who! at September 1, 2009 7:09 PM

Kayanne you make a valid point. I come here because I love this website, hell, some nights I come here first before I visit my porn sites or vise versa. I probably get shitted on the most of anyone, and I accept it and it doesn’t bother me one bit. For all those that feel too intimidated to comment, sucks to be you, come on people how in the hell can you get intimidated by someone that you’ll never meet? The more people that come and comment the better it is.

Posted by: Guess Who! at September 1, 2009 7:19 PM

Dear lord, how do these things turn into lurker vs regular so quick? Anyway, for the sake of those non-regulars, here my suggestion: every time one of the writers mentions something like the godtopus or murdertank, it gets hyperlinked to the dictionary entry. That way, people can just click on the word and figure out what the hell it means if they're confused. Also, I second the dictionary link on the main page suggestion.

Posted by: s. pisaster at September 1, 2009 7:30 PM

...and there you go. Seastar fucking knocked it outta the park. I'm in loooove.

Nice job Mizz Lady-Face...

Posted by: Skitz at September 1, 2009 7:47 PM

But the thing is, you're essentially asking us to censor ourselves. Part of our joy in this community is that we *can* say whatever we like, we can argue (and heaven knows we love to do that) for or against something or someone else, and yes, sometimes those arguments turn ugly (particularly in the threads that get political). Just like in real life, with my "birth family", where I don't censor myself, and if someone wants to argue with me, I don't resort to name calling, just like I don't here. The majority of the regular commenters don't. And, as someone above mentioned, I don't take it personally when people shoot me down, or, heavens forfend, ignore me. I have also been known to change my mind if an argument compels such action.

In addition, it takes time to get to know someone and feel comfortable, or familial, with them. Just like in life. And other times, you take a liking to someone right away, and then it turns out later you don't get along as well as you did initially. And that's okay. Everybody can't like everybody else; it's just not possible. But, just like in life, I'm not going to watch everything I say for fear of hurting someone's feelings or offending. Finally, there's only so many times we can "put on [our] big girl panties and invite them to tea" before we give up, and we shouldn't have to "hush" if it's not to everyone's liking

I hope this doesn't sound harsh in any way. It is, once again, not my intention to "attack" anyone. I am simply stating my opinion on the discussion at hand, which is that I shouldn't have to keep quiet to appease anyone. I close by saying: the commentary contained herein is not representative of anyone but me. I pretend to speak for no one but myself and OH DEAR GOD A GIANT SPIDER JUST LOWERED ITSELF FROM THE CEILING RIGHT IN FRONT OF MY DAMN FACE HOLY CRAP IT'S BIGGER THAN MY HEAD AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH HELP MEEEEEEEEEEE!!!!

Posted by: Anna von Beaverplatz at September 1, 2009 7:47 PM

GUESS WHO IF YOU COME OVER HERE AND KILL THIS GIGANTIC HORRIFYING SPIDER I WILL MAKE YOU ANY KIND OF DAMNED SANDWICH YOU WANT AAHHHHHHAHHHHHHHHHHHH

Posted by: Anna von Beaverplatz at September 1, 2009 7:52 PM

Look, when even Guess Whookie says y'all should just stop worrying and comment, y'all should just stop worrying and comment.

AvB, a shiny nickel for using the word "forfend". A shiny nickel may be no use to you if you've been killed by a spider, but I offer it anyway.

Posted by: MM at September 1, 2009 7:52 PM

I'll take the nickel if AvB is incapacitated or otherwise indisposed! YAY for free money!!

Posted by: Lainey at September 1, 2009 7:59 PM

When I'm feeling ignored in a comment thread, I find self-flagellation helps. I whip an Apple mighty mouse over my shoulder repeatedly, all the while intoning "Nothing. To. Contribute".

Posted by: Lauren at September 1, 2009 8:04 PM

I've been posting round these parts pretty regular for about 15 years and I still don't know the origins of panda rape, the murdertank, something about a baby and whiskey, and the godtopussy thing.

I can sort of chuckle at them on the surface level only, but hell if I know how they started.

Nor am I all that motivated to find out.

I guess what I'm saying is, if you see inside shit in the actual content, either ASK (seriously, someone will probably tell you) or just ignore it and comment anyway. (Someone did finally sort of tell me what a "hipster" is.)

But whatever, man. Shut up. Or don't. I don't care.

Oh Pajeeba is the good. I like all the reviewers especially Esquires Morton and Wilson and that one going bald and...who else? Dude who runs the site (hee). Can't think of other names. All of them, love them. Big smooshy hugs.

I especially feel giddy that so many people want to see more retrospectives/classics. YAY!

I am Snuggiepants. And I am the Deathbringer.

Posted by: Snuggiepants the Deathbringer at September 1, 2009 8:05 PM

I remember when I first came around. I was a dipshit who thought it was funny to call "first" in a thread and was promptly ridiculed. Then came a welcoming committee of Skitz and Pookie checking on the new chickmeat. Skittums made a mockery of me and won himself the first and only PajibOscar. It ain't all happy farts, marshmallow tits and tequila toasts around here.

Posted by: Cindy at September 1, 2009 8:11 PM

Now how the fuck are people going to argue and fight on here and nobody even bothers to find me and tell me about it? Goddamn't. That's my fucking job people...my fucking job! Now what is this debate/argument/shit fuckstorm going on? Huh? Speak up!

*cracks knuckles*

Posted by: Deistbrawler at September 1, 2009 8:14 PM

1. I usually lurk rather than comment because I get here late in the day and somebody else not only has said it, but said it better. Sucks to be me. I deal with it.

2. A few more real-time reviews would be appreciated. They are hysterical. I need all the funny I can get.

3. Paheeba Day - rather than once a week, maybe make it once a month-ish. But not on a regular schedule. So it's comes as a bit of a surprise and shock, so to speak....

Posted by: bjs1109 at September 1, 2009 8:23 PM

I know we've only known each other four weeks and three days, but to me it seems like nine weeks and five days. The first day seemed like a week and the second day seemed like five days. And the third day seemed like a week again and the fourth day seemed like eight days. And the fifth day you went to see your mother and that seemed just like a day, and then you came back and later on the sixth day, in the evening, when we saw each other, that started seeming like two days, so in the evening it seemed like two days spilling over into the next day and that started seeming like four days, so at the end of the sixth day on into the seventh day, it seemed like a total of five days. And the sixth day seemed like a week and a half. I have it written down, but I can show it to you tomorrow if you want to see it.


Point is...I love you people.

Posted by: ashes at September 1, 2009 8:28 PM

Commenter Profiles
On that vein, would there be a way to let posters have profiles? Cause my memory is wretched and I can't remember who's who sometimes since there are so many commenters, and I think that would help with the community vibe. Maybe this would be hella hard to accomplish.
---
I cannot second this enough.

Also, the reason that we act like a clique is that we ARE a clique: "Noun: a small exclusive group of friends or associates." Exclusive because we don't talk sports (much) and we don't talk politics (much) and we don't talk religion (much), unless (usually) it relates to movies or TV or books.

We're movie and TV and book geeks. But we're not like "Mean Girls" or anything, we're a friendly clique.* Do you like movies and TV and books? Do you like talking and arguing about them? You're in. But come with your opinions reasonably well thought-out and prepared to defend them, or I can't be responsible for what happens to you.

*-Usually. I speak not for BarbadoSlim. And if you don't get that reference, then just lurk a little longer.

Posted by: , (the commenter formerly known as bucdaddy) at September 1, 2009 8:37 PM

Kayanne, hopefully you're still checking this thread. I'm not sure I thanked you for this before, but your defense of me was one of the reasons I didn't completely ditch Pajiba after the election coverage. So, thank you.

As for my two cents on this issue: I made one comment in that freaking politics thread, purely about my own choice, and in return I received malicious, personal attacks from multiple people. I even had one person continue to attack me months later, someone to whom I had said nothing. I was not a lurker-I had been posting regularly for a few months and made EE a few times. I also think I have a pretty thick skin, but I came very close to telling you all to fuck the hell off (by simply never posting again and thereby depriving you all of the pleasure of my comments). That may have been an anomaly, since politics brings out the worst in some people, but it does contradict everyone who thinks it's only the stupid one-off people who get torn to shreds. It's also part of why I will never really feel like part of the Pajiba Community. (Not a pity party-I don't necessarily want to feel a part of it.)

Anyways, my thoughts on other changes:

I'm glad comment diversions will be scaled back a little, glad CR will continue, and neutral on both "Two Truths and a Lie" and "Trailer Appreciation." I'm also glad music will be leaving, not because I didn't like it, but because it made me sad how little attention to got around here. Different audiences, what are you gonna do? I'll follow it.

Posted by: SaBrina at September 1, 2009 8:39 PM

SaBrina...who are you? :-)

Posted by: Deistbrawler at September 1, 2009 8:54 PM

*sob*

SEE WHAT I MEAN?!

Posted by: SaBrina at September 1, 2009 9:02 PM

I remember you SaBrina! Girl, stay away from political threads at non-political sites. They never turn out well.

How about a brownie?

Posted by: Cindy at September 1, 2009 9:13 PM

*hugs SaBrina*

I'm always here for hugs and defense of the underdogs.

I can hide you in my bosom.

Posted by: Kayanne at September 1, 2009 9:27 PM

Posted by: ashes at September 1, 2009 8:28 PM

For that, ashes, I'd love you if you were the color of a baboon's ass.


Lurkers, just remember that we regulars can't even keep all our inside jokes straight. No one will be offended if you don't know what Macho Nachos are. When you get frustrated, just remember Rick Moranis's famous words:
"I knew it. I'm surrounded by assholes!"

Posted by: branded at September 1, 2009 9:32 PM

Never fear, Guess Who, I'm in no danger of taking you too seriously. I just couldn't resist the chance to take you down. Go ahead and make all the dirty comments you like.

I love this place, even though I don't comment often, because you all are so funny. Long live Pajiba!

Posted by: Suz at September 1, 2009 9:42 PM

Heh, thanks Cindy. Brownies! And bosom-hiding! My night definitely picked up.

(Btdubs, I know people are generally aware of my existence, and that Deist was joking. :) That wasn't exactly my point, but it's not important.)

I would like to add that I don't enjoy the piling-on of the stupid one-off people, either. Not because I feel bad for someone who's probably just trying to elicit that kind of response, but because it bores me. If it also intimidates people who haven't posted yet, that also sucks. Yeah, yeah, thick skin, suck it up, jump in--that's also valid. No side is wrong here.

Posted by: SaBrina at September 1, 2009 10:08 PM

Oh! Skitz reminded me... I forgot to mention my suggestion of a Nude Pajiba Staff Pictorial.

Posted by: Anna von Beaverplatz at September 1, 2009 4:16 PM

My computer just did a preemptive crash. Thank you for protecting me, Avast.

Carlson is a nice fella, but I will report this site to Homeland Security if you ever post a pic of his slowly going bald sack.

Posted by: L.O.V.E. at September 1, 2009 10:30 PM

Hey! I'm fairly certain I also defended you in that thread, Sabrina. And political threads are ALWAYS going to do that... not just here, as ,(tcfkab) pointed out. Political views are something many people hold very dearly, and they will bite you in the face if you disagree with them. It's why I never, ever discuss politics. I walk away. Always. Even with my family.

Posted by: Anna von Beaverplatz at September 1, 2009 10:34 PM

Once (and only once, mind you, as I love me the comments) I think it would be interesting to have a post without comments. How would Pajibans and Pajibettes react?

Posted by: coryo at September 1, 2009 2:16 PM

Listen up you communist swine. We will have none of your insolence. Go back to your hippie commune, smoke some more of your hippie lettuce, and sing some more of your hippie songs. We're doing the Lord's work over here. Not that you would know anything about work, you shiftless bastard.

Posted by: L.O.V.E. at September 1, 2009 10:43 PM

You're right, Cindy. Fuck the lot of them if they can't be as funny as the regulars.

I can be as funny as the regulars. Honestly! Just give me a chance! I'm ready coach - put me in!

No but seriously, I'm not sure if I've mentioned this yet but I'm Canadian and our humour can be more, um, subtle at times (except for Admin, and I seriously doubt that he is Canadian. I think he just pretends to be one for our free health care and our moose steaks. His breaking into our country is, alas, a story for another day though - however it must be acknowledged that I and others (like Meaux - Hi Meaux!) willingly go along with his "Canadian" heritage as he's been featured on EE several times and it's always nice to have Canadian representation). Where was I? Oh right, bringing the funny.

My Canadian humour being too subtle for you damn non-Canadian jerks to appreciate and acknowledge is, sadly, my cross to bear.

Posted by: Kelly at September 1, 2009 10:45 PM

OK see THAT was funny ;)

Posted by: figgy at September 1, 2009 11:14 PM

Oh please, figgy, that Canadian humor is only 9/10ths as funny as the stuff we're coming up with in the U.S.

Posted by: L.O.V.E. at September 1, 2009 11:23 PM

Oh please, figgy, that Canadian humor is only 9/10ths as funny as the stuff we're coming up with in the U.S.

How dare you sir/madame!

I'll have you know that once you factor in the exchange rate - Canadians are a full 48 cents funnier than the average American.

True fact. Google it.

Posted by: Kelly at September 1, 2009 11:28 PM

*Hugs SaBrina. Cops a feel.*

Posted by: , (the commenter formerly known as bucdaddy) at September 1, 2009 11:54 PM

Julie has cookies? I always keep a bag of candy handy. Just trying to help Pajiba lure the crucial 10-to-13-year-old female demographic.

The sacrifices I make.

Posted by: , (the commenter formerly known as bucdaddy) at September 1, 2009 11:57 PM

If you want to get noticed and initiated into the community, all you to do is ingratiate yourself. Screw sincerity.

-Zombies
-Fillion
-Whedon
-Alcohol
-Intentional misspellings
-Cusack
-Hannigan
-Sexy sex makes sex sexier
-Indie
-Clarkson
-Bunk
-Thrilby
-'squee'
-The lesser work (aka: all of it) of C. Crowe
-MurderTank
-'Godtopus'
-Complaining about Arrested Development (Hey, I loved that show, but the third season was pixie piss poor)
-'Alternative' skanks. What does that even mean? Sure, one is more talented than the other, but thinking through it, both ScarJo and K.Win are two whiny-ass, boring as fuck girls who have had a lot of fucking rhinoplasty.

-Freaks and Geeks
-Felicia Day
-I *heart* syntax
-RDJ
-David Duchovny (really? His face looks lie a 'past it' foot. When did *he* happen?)

et cetera. Who can keep pace? Consult your Pajiba Dictionary for all of the approved lingo and references. Even if you think a lot of these pre-occupations are batshit, embrace them. Slip any four of these things into your comments, and you can very easily become Emperor of the Internet.

Jimmy Cliff says, 'You Can Have it if You Really Want it'. But if we insist on leaving our computers and getting some oxygen, we do so knowing that we aren't able to fully devote ourselves to the study of the sacred texts and canonical archives.

Everybody wants to play the lead, but you know what? Screw it. Go play in the sun as we were meant to do. Be a one man party.

Posted by: Jo 'Mama' Besser at September 2, 2009 12:03 AM

Ack, then thank you as well, AvB. I think Kayanne stuck out more since she was vigorousest. But yeah, I know politics can rile people up, which is another reason I decided to move on.

And thanks comma comma comma but I really don't need hugs. This was ages ago. And I don't need feel-copping either. Don't start what you're not going to finish.

Posted by: SaBrina at September 2, 2009 12:44 AM

Kelly, I'm a MAN. An American Man!

And I don't trust your math. You must be using that bullcrap metric system, eh. Like liters or kilometers or that kinda garbage.

We don't play that shit around here, canucklehead.

Posted by: L.O.V.E. at September 2, 2009 12:48 AM

*Also Hugs SaBrina. Also Cops a feel.*

So this is a nice rave. Can I have a glowstick? Anyone got some water? I'm thirsty.

Posted by: L.O.V.E. at September 2, 2009 12:52 AM

canucklehead.

Posted by: L.O.V.E. at September 2, 2009 12:48 AM
---
Funniest thing I've ever heard boobs called?

Canuckiebubbles.

Posted by: , (TCFKAB) at September 2, 2009 1:35 AM

What the fuck happened to this thread? Hey my druggie friends, What's up? Wait...Canada doesn't suck my nuts...wait, what happened?

Posted by: Deistbrawler at September 2, 2009 3:51 AM

Sweet Jebus I love this place.
Honestly, I hardly even read the reviews. Except the recent love letters about Doctor Who. Those made me happy in the pants. Since I have no time for a real life, I pretend to live here, with all of you weirdos. I was at a friends house the other day (first time out with friends in months) and I actually checked in on Pajiba from his computer, because y'all were more fun than the real people! Now, If only I could get laid around here....

I lurked for years (work computer wouldn't let me comment) and have dabbled in and out of the comments as time permits. When I finally got back online this June after a 3 month computer freeze, the FIRST place I went (after the horrific inbox of my email) was Pajiba. I made EE top 10 twice, in a row even! Seriously, I am obviously not that funny. I do have bad luck with office toilets and funny spastic pets though. So enough about the clique thing. Just jump in. And tell dirty jokes. THAT will get attention.

I was more shaken by Alabama Pink's passing than my own Grandparents deaths. All of them. Tell me that this isn't a community, go on, just try.

Seriously though, Get with the program and review Rescue Me. And do it right. LOVE IT!

Posted by: Lindsey with an 'e' at September 2, 2009 5:10 AM

I didn't really notice the clique thing going on until I read this page. It's a bit of a wank-fest here.

Posted by: Dahlia at September 2, 2009 6:34 AM

No Suz, I don’t have any dirty jokes to tell and you are right about everything you’ve said. I love this place also, I love movies and talking about them among the few friends I have here at pajiba. I remember as a kid walking home from school one day and a bunch of kids thought it would be funny to push me down, anyway one kid push me so hard that I fell on my hip and cracked it. The next thing I know I’m at the hospital and the doctors are telling my parents I’ll walk with a limp for the rest of my life. After about three surgeries and a year of missing school I was able to walk again but with a slight limp because the doctors had to actually shave down part of my hip. That year of missing school I was home everyday watching movies, I’ve probably seen more movies than anyone here at pajiba. So yes Suz I can be sort of an asshole at times, but I don’t mean any harm and I’m sorry if I’ve said anything to offend you. But for anyone to feel intimidated by anyone else here is so unfortunate.

Posted by: Guess Who! at September 2, 2009 7:21 AM

Re: the clique argument: some of us CAN'T just "jump right in," because the comment threads are going on while we're in the eastern hemisphere fast asleep. (Of course, I'm days late on this one, but that's just because it's been a crazy week.) Obviously there's nothing that can be done about that; I just have to accept the fact that I can either (1) comment at the very end of a thread, and have no one read it, or (2) give up and not be part of the club. But I'd still like to enjoy the actual site posts regardless. Believe me, I LOVE reading the comments and don't want that to stop. I'd join in if I could. But since I can't, I'd like to be able to enjoy the rest of the site without having to wade through dozens of inside jokes just to read some review.

I'll also agree that it's disheartening when I have some actual commentary on the movie/book/whatever at hand, and the conversation took a turn hours before, so trying to post an on-topic comment makes me feel like the class geek. Though I'm not really sure what can be done about that, so sorry if that wasn't a very helpful observation.

Also, on the same note, please don't change the time of the Comment Diversions! They're the only things I get to occasionally post to and feel excited that someone might be reading my words! Just my vote.

I also wanted to echo a lot of others who have suggested some of the posts be condensed into a format more similar to Pajiba Love. There's SO much posted that it feels very cluttered, and if I miss two days, it's buried.

Posted by: Pistachio at September 2, 2009 9:10 AM

I'll echo Pistacho's echo of condensing things. With trade news specifically, I'm usually not that interested, yet it takes up a good chunk of the page and pushes off threads I like. I know the reasoning behind splitting it up was so you could be "current," but I don't come here for news.

Posted by: SaBrina at September 2, 2009 9:30 AM

Pistachio, even if it feels too late, comment anyway. Even if the "conversation" is so far off the rails that it feels weird to bring it back to the topic, do it anyway. There are those of us who go back and read the threads we're interested in, even a couple of days later, and who are actually interested in the topic and what others have to say on it.

Also, can anyone point out an example of a review that was loaded with "inside jokes"? I'm having a hard time finding one. I mean, I see occasional Godtopus references, but that's pretty much it...

Posted by: Anna von Beaverplatz at September 2, 2009 9:35 AM

*touches SaBrina's boob, runs away giggling*

Posted by: gp at September 2, 2009 9:45 AM

Wonderful, another gay man feeling me up. How am I supposed to get any action from you people?

Posted by: SaBrina at September 2, 2009 10:11 AM

I read your comment, Pistachio! And do what AvB says, seriously, she's a smart lady. I'd bet a good number of us come back to read the newest comments until a thread is honest-to-goodness dead.

Posted by: Eyvi at September 2, 2009 10:20 AM

gp I see how you've been behaving in my absence...

*sobs* I wish I'd never come back!

Posted by: Kayanne at September 2, 2009 10:22 AM

Kelly, I'm a MAN. An American Man!

And I don't trust your math. You must be using that bullcrap metric system, eh. Like liters or kilometers or that kinda garbage.

We don't play that shit around here, canucklehead.

Aww sweetie, we Canadians realize that math can be hard but we have faith in our American brethren. We know you can do it.

Let's try a math problem together!

If Admin has 23kg of moose meat and Meaux wants to purchase 5lbs of it, how many kg's of succulent moose meat will Admin give her?

First person with the right answer gets a picture of my canuckiebubbles.

Posted by: Kelly at September 2, 2009 11:09 AM

Admin can't give her any of his moose meat. They're both married.

Posted by: branded at September 2, 2009 11:17 AM

2.26796185 kg

Posted by: elizabeth at September 2, 2009 11:18 AM

Damnit! I should have known it was a trick question!

Posted by: elizabeth at September 2, 2009 11:20 AM

Meaux is Mrs. Admin? Wait. No. I'm not sure that's right.

Posted by: Snuggiepants the Deathbringer at September 2, 2009 11:27 AM

Admin can't give her any of his moose meat. They're both married.

Okay see now that? Cracked my shit up. Damn branded!

But in all seriousness, you probably shouldn't believe everything Admin tells you. I know he's always going on and on about his moose and his igloo of love but 1) there are serious questions about his Canadian nationality and 2) Admin with Moose meat? Eh... I dunno, possum meat, perhaps maybe even deer meat. But definitely not moose meat.

And elizabeth, I highly suspect that you are a fellow Canuck, no one but a Canadian could come up with the answer that quickly.

Pop quiz elizabeth - if I asked you to come out for a quick bite of poutine with me would your answer be

a) Pou-what?
b) Oh yes, that delicious gravy and cheese thing you Cana - I mean we Canadians love so much.
or
c) Hell yeah eh! Hey, did you know if you add bacon and sour cream to it - it's even more delicious?

Posted by: Kelly at September 2, 2009 11:34 AM

I've been lurking for a while now, and the reason I don't comment has nothing to do with inside jokes and references. I think those personal touches are what make the Pajiba experience unique.

I once knew this guy who was so damn funny and witty that it actually intimidated me to the point that I hardly ever opened my mouth when I was around him. I just basked in his awesomeness. And made sure I visited the bathroom beforehand. Just saying.

I guess what I'm also saying is that I have a mad crush on all of you.

And any question about someone's succulent meat is a trick question.

Posted by: calypso at September 2, 2009 11:42 AM

I rarely read the music reviews (I'm just too old to care about most of those bands), so I won't miss them. But I am glad that they will still be somewhere around for those who like 'em.

My suggestion: because of the sheer number of reviews etc. posted here, if I miss a few days, I have a hard time catching up as I have to check under each heading for the articles I've missed. So would it be possible to add archive links, which would allow one to see all of a day's, (or week's), entries in one place?

Um.... what else? I would be happy to see the occasional DVD review. And the Boozehound needs to take an ibuprofen for the hangover and come on back!

Posted by: Tarn at September 2, 2009 11:43 AM

No East Coast whining about things happening 'round here whilst you are abed. I am late to the party by the time I get up in the (late) morning (Portland OR.) I train horses all afternoon and evening (12-9PM) with no Internet access, and joined this thread 24 hours late, and yet still, here we are. People keep checking back on threads they comment on.
Until they get distracted by something shiny.
Or porn.

BTW: Regarding the potential porn reviews: I think that could be awesome,it is the closest thing to action I 'm going to get, but would that affect the NSFW aspect of this site? I am self-employed now,and the horses are a pretty open minded bunch, porn-wise, but when I worked in an office I wold have been nervous about that.

And enough showing off your superior maths skills. Effin' Canuks. Go blow a beaver or something.

I feel the slight need to clarify something I said (late) last night, even though I am sure nobody cares: When I said I hardly even read the reviews, I meant that skim the ones that I am not terribly interested in, devour the ones I am, and skip straight to the melee of the comments if it looks like a shit-storm is happening in there. I think the reviews are exceptionally well written, and hats off to all who contribute.
There I feel better now.

Posted by: Lindsey with an 'e' at September 2, 2009 1:10 PM

And enough showing off your superior maths skills. Effin' Canuks. Go blow a beaver or something.

Ahh, the beaver - a proud symbol of our nation. We Canadians are very proud of our beavers, and so we should be frankly. In fact, many of us keep a pet beaver in our home. They are strong and furry and can chew down a tree in a matter of hours - which is always handy. If you piss them off though they will make your life hell.

Also, Canadian beavers have excellent math skills and are frequently spotted in American bars and night clubs mentally converting inches to centimetres while laughing hysterically under their breath.

Now, which of you brave Americans want to hang out with my beaver? She's in the backyard cutting up some firewood.

Posted by: Kelly at September 2, 2009 1:49 PM

canucklehead.

Posted by: L.O.V.E. at September 2, 2009 12:48 AM
---
Funniest thing I've ever heard boobs called?

Canuckiebubbles.

Posted by: , (TCFKAB) at September 2, 2009 1:35 AM

No shit?

If I ever go to Vancouver I plan on groping some Canuckiebubbles while receiving some Canucklehead.

Posted by: L.O.V.E. at September 2, 2009 1:56 PM

If Admin has 23kg of moose meat and Meaux wants to purchase 5lbs of it, how many kg's of succulent moose meat will Admin give her?

The answer is none! Admin will receive 5 POUNDS of moose meat, just like he ordered, and wont accept your bait and switch scheme, ya lily-white hoser.

Oh, and how much for the moose knuckle?

Posted by: L.O.V.E. at September 2, 2009 2:02 PM

As usual I am really late to the comments but if anyone is still checking these...


Okay, I love movie reviews, but there is something about movie reviews that always bothers me: they are always written & published so that they can be read before you see the movie. They are spoiler conscious (even though they usually put their clumsy fingerprints all over your viewing experience anyway) so they never go in-depth about the pivotal scenes, stylistic choices, character development, etc.

The reviews on Pajiba are some of the best film criticism I've seen since Roger Ebert's stroke (feel free to borrow that for a tag line if you want) and yet they suffer from the same inherent limitation that all movie reviews do: they don't go deep enough.

And on a site like Pajiba the comment section, god love 'em, is filled with an overwhelming majority of people who haven't seen the movie yet (and who also don't want spoilers) so you don't see really meaningful discussion of the film there either. By the time I actually see Adventureland the movie is 4 months old and nobody is there to talk about it anymore.

On the other hand there are sites like imdb, where posters may have seen the movie (recently) but there is such a high stupidity to meaningful content ratio that posting or reading over there is pointless.

I guess what I am saying is, I've always longed for a higher quality of movie review that respected the reader's intelligence and assumed familiarity with the films content. Even better, one that allowed for a back-and-forth exchange of ideas. I love when Pajiba re-reviews older movies (the only problem here is that you usually go too far back, and I haven't seen the movie in question in 10 years).

So, (finally getting to the point...) My suggestion would be to keep that going or even improve it. Maybe certain movies- deserving movies, movies of higher quality or cultural significance- could get a more in-depth review & discussion shortly after they are released on DVD? Everybody will have had the chance to see it, and some people will have the added perspective of a second viewing after seeing it in the theater. Everyone can get in on the discussion in the comments; eloquents and staff writers alike digging into a worthy text and providing fresh insights and perspective.

Taking it a step further, it could become a Pajiba movie club. Announce in advance what movie you will do, give everyone a chance to get it from Netflix, provide an in-depth review to start the discussion off and then encourage more in the comments. Something like Inglourious Basterds would be perfect for this. That's the kind of movie that you want to talk about afterward, that is open for a lot of different opinions. Even the comments section discussion was starting to get interesting (but I had to hang back, I hadn't seen it yet...)

Anyway, that's my idea. Do with it what you will. Thanks for your time.

Posted by: Yossarian at September 2, 2009 2:07 PM

Oh, and how much for the moose knuckle?

Oh honey, you can't handle the moose knuckle.

Posted by: Kelly at September 2, 2009 2:14 PM

I think I'd like to hang out with Kelly's beaver.

Also, I love Yossarian's suggestion.

Posted by: Anna von Beaverplatz at September 2, 2009 2:20 PM

Yossarian, that's a grand idea. I would love more in-depth discussions after seeing a movie.

Posted by: Cindy at September 2, 2009 2:25 PM

I think I'd like to hang out with Kelly's beaver.

Anna, that's the nicest thing anybody's ever said to me. Kisses to you!

And add me to the list of people who like Yossarian's suggestion.

Posted by: Kelly at September 2, 2009 2:29 PM

Oh honey, you can't handle the moose knuckle.

Posted by: Kelly at September 2, 2009 2:14 PM


I WANT THE MOOSE KNUCKLE!

DID YOU ORDER THE MOOSE KNUCKLE?!?

Posted by: L.O.V.E. at September 2, 2009 2:44 PM

I have completely lost track of this thread, but I think somewhere someone mentioned wanting profiles of regular commenters...and I just wanted to say that a lot of us are on facebook (there is a facebook pajiba group, complete with thread revealing everyone's secret identities). And most of us are friend-whores, so...y'know...come on over.

Posted by: s. pisaster at September 2, 2009 3:00 PM

Kelly,

C. Though I'd specify cheese curds

Posted by: elizabeth at September 2, 2009 3:02 PM

I kind of adore Yossarian's suggestion. Seriously, that'd be a fun. But I do worry about the sanity of the poor writers; seriously, reviewing a semi-recent film with a more indepth analysis. I think they suffer enough with all the Paul Blart's in the world. Maybe that'd have to be a volunteer basis job.

And as for you Canadians, like any good American, I don't trust anything living in my attic.

Posted by: Kayanne at September 2, 2009 3:06 PM

Wait, wait, one more thing! I've griped about it before, but the link arrows at the bottom of each article give me a brainfart every time. To my mind, the arrow to the right should take you to the next article down from the top on the main page, and the arrow on the left should take you back. It's ingrained in my head that "right" means "advance", but here it seems backward.

And I really like Yossarian's idea.

Posted by: Lauren at September 2, 2009 4:14 PM

DID YOU ORDER THE MOOSE KNUCKLE?!?

Okay, okay, hold your water. I've ordered the moose knuckle - but don't say I didn't warn you.

C. Though I'd specify cheese curds

Ahh, elizabeth - obviously you are a girl with impeccable tastes. If my heart didn't already belong to Anna over there, I'd hand it over to you. But I have a dream that one day Anna will love poutine as much as we do.

Posted by: Kelly at September 2, 2009 4:35 PM

And as for you Canadians, like any good American, I don't trust anything living in my attic.

Hey, attics are fun! Nothing bad ever happens in an attic. It's all sunshine, moose knuckles and beavers up here baby!

Posted by: Kelly at September 2, 2009 4:42 PM

I would do terrible, terrible things for some poutine and butter tarts right now. I haven't eaten one in years, but it's too bad you Americans can't get the Flurries with Smarties in them. One bite of that candy-coated paradise will make you question everything you once believed to be true. Take that, beliefs.

Posted by: Jo 'Mama' Besser at September 2, 2009 6:03 PM

Jo 'Mama' is Canadian? Did I read that right? If so, that makes me crazy happy!

Posted by: Eyvi at September 2, 2009 7:31 PM

Hey Rowles. We're not finished over here. Get this shit back on the front page, yo.

Posted by: L.O.V.E. at September 2, 2009 8:35 PM

Signs you're not part of the clique:

* You suggest something in the Suggestion Box, only to read a day or so later that someone else suggested the same thing after you... and then someone else agreed with - and credited the idea to - the person who posted after you.

* No one has ever replied to anything you've said. Except once. And it was an attack on you (this is apparently more common than I thought).

* You don't find exaggerated flirting fun or funny. But only because you're never involved.

* You're either over 40 or under 25.

* You haven't bothered to think up a witty handle. I'm sorry if the name given to me at birth isn't good enough!

* You read this comment and silently wept.

Posted by: ben at September 3, 2009 3:28 AM

I love Yossarian's idea of a film club. I think it's an absolute brainwave for something that we could do, say, every other week or so.

Posted by: Caspar at September 3, 2009 10:12 AM