web
counter
 

The Hunger Games: Why I Hope the Catching Fire, Mockingjay Films Are Better Than the Books

By Sarah Carlson | Posted Under Comment Diversions | Comments (34)



Peeta4.jpg

HGTrilogy.jpgRevisiting “The Hunger Games” trilogy now that plenty of images from and a full-length for the film adaptation of the first book have been released makes for interesting reading. I still see the world Suzanne Collins created as I did at first, but now I also I try to imagine it through the filmmakers’ views, and with Jennifer Lawrence as Katniss Everdeen, Josh Hutcherson as Peeta Mellark (above) and Liam Hemsworth as Gale Hawthorne. “The Hunger Games,” coming March 23, lends itself easily for film adaptation — it’s not very long and is paced quite well, never losing momentum and pulling readers quickly into its dystopian tale of children forced to fight to the death. That’s what makes it so readable and enjoyable. But the second and third books, “Catching Fire” and “Mockingjay”? Here, we’ve got problems. And here I can say what fans of the book aren’t supposed to: I hope the movie versions are better.

“Catching Fire” already has a release date — Nov. 22, 2013 — but Lionsgate has revealed the trilogy will become a four-part film series. There’s no indication how the last two books will be split up, whether they will be spread out over three films or if “Mockingjay” will be split in half, a la “Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows.” Whatever happens, there’s room for improvement.

“Mockingjay” is the weakest of the bunch, and for much of it we’re inside Katniss’ head. The series is written in first-person from her view already, but unlike in “The Hunger Games,” parts of “Catching Fire” and a chunk of “Mockingjay” are from her perspective when little to no action is happening. And because Katniss is a teenager, albeit a clever and brave one, we’re reminded that teenagers can be pretty annoying. Reading this is OK, but watching it would be dreadful. The book is almost as exhausting as Katniss. I expect the films to speed up the narrative while at the same time expanding it at parts, such as battle scenes. I’m generally a purist when it comes to adaptations; directors can cut material, but adding is a no-no. But if Collins wants to take the opportunity to tweak her work, even giving fans more of a Hollywood ending, I won’t oppose.

“The Hunger Games” series is bleak, and that’s part of its appeal. The series is written for young adults but is in no way kid-friendly. But only the first book is truly addicting. Here’s hoping that on screen, the final two are as well.

So, fans, what are you hoping for in the adaptations? And while most will agree books are almost always better than their movie versions, surely there are exceptions. Any ideas?

Sarah Carlson has a front-row seat to the decline of the newspaper industry and really wishes Peeta were a real person.









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



"American Horror Story" -- "Birth" -- "Tate, You Are The Darkness" | Say Goodbye To These! Karen Gillan Is Leaving "Doctor Who"









Comments

Kind of off topic but every time I see a photo of Peeta, I'm reminded of James Caan.

Posted by: snapnhiss at December 16, 2011 1:11 PM

But if Collins wants to take the opportunity to tweak her work, even giving fans more of a Hollywood ending, I won’t oppose.

JESUS CHRIST ON A BICYCLE ARE YOU KIDDING ME? NO NO NO!! *insert Sr.Chang's no-no-no gif here*

Didn't mean to go caps lock, but, seriously, no. If they change the ending of this series I'll hate it forever. And I mean the Star Wars prequels kinda of hate. She got it perfectly right, I think. It's not all roses, and it doesn't, nay, it shouldn't have to be. This is not "all was well" nineteen years later (I love you, Rowling, but what the fuck?). People go through fucked up shit and they end up fucked people, and they try to go on with their lives as best as they can. Not everything has to be pretty and wonderful. AND THAT'S OK.


Posted by: Holly at December 16, 2011 1:17 PM

I agree with Sarah. While the substance of the ending should remain intact, how we get there should be drastically improved. Having experienced the novels in audiobook form, parts of the 2nd and 3rd books were REALLY hard to get through.

Posted by: Socraz6 at December 16, 2011 1:33 PM

I just finished reading Mockingjay last night, and I agree with Holly. Collins got it right with the ending; even so, I think that the last chapter--if filmed and edited properly--can be a "Hollywood"-enough ending as-is.

Posted by: Sean at December 16, 2011 1:36 PM

A couple exceptions to whole notion that the book is always better than the movie...

"Silence of The Lambs" - The book isn't bad, but the movie is better.

"Lord of the Rings" - I like the movies a lot more. They do a better job with the characters and almost all of the changes they made are improvements over the books.

Posted by: Forbiddendonut at December 16, 2011 1:37 PM

Holly I am with you on this one. For me the ending could have been even more fucked up and I still would have loved the whole thing. So DO NOT touch that ending!

As for the middle parts, sure there could be some tweaking done here and there to streamline things a little. It's been a whil since I've read them but there are still some iconic images in my from all three that I cannot wait to see done right. I wonder if it's normal to look forward to having your heart ripped out by a movie?

Posted by: Phedre at December 16, 2011 1:39 PM

It seems to me that they don't really have to add anything, just expand on some scenes that were glossed over in the book. One that comes to mind is when they go and rescue Peeta from the capitol in Mockingjay. In the books, it just happens in the background while Katniss is just moping around 13, but it could definitely be made into a nice action scene for the movie. If they decide to not show everything from Katniss' perspective it would make the movies that much better.

The thing that is going to be hard to do in the movie (well, in any movie adaptation really) is conveying her thoughts without resorting to constant flashbacks or narration. In any case, I enjoyed the books and am excited for the movies.

Posted by: mike at December 16, 2011 1:53 PM

Exceptions? To Kill a Mockingbird is a fantastic film and a fantastic book. I think the Matilda film actually gets the story's messages across much better. It's still scary and funny, but it's not as threatening. I remember being really put off by the outrageous danger level in the book but loving the film that didn't change all that much.

I could go on a long time if we extended the topic to play-to-film adaptations, but that's a whole other kettle of fish.

Posted by: Robert at December 16, 2011 2:04 PM

But if Collins wants to [...] [give] fans more of a Hollywood ending, I won’t oppose.

Oh HELL no. I mean, WHAT???

Thankfully, more eloquent people than me have already commented, so basically: what Holly and Phedre said.

For shame, Sarah.

Posted by: Thijs at December 16, 2011 2:11 PM

The latter Song of Ice and Fire Books. Especially the ending of A Dance With Dragons. God damn it I hate you sometimes, George.

Posted by: admin at December 16, 2011 2:14 PM

I hope they don't mess with any of the deaths in the second and third books. And that what happens to Peeta remains as harrowing as it is. There's no need to lighten up the books, although I worry they will anyway. And I agree with everyone who hopes they'll leave the ending as is.

Posted by: MelBivDevoe at December 16, 2011 2:18 PM

I really like Mockingjay, mostly because it doesn't make Katniss the hero in charge of everything (she's 17 years old, after all). The themes dealing with how to carve out her own autonomy are interesting, although sometimes rough to get through. Collins also makes Katniss brain damaged with attention and emotional issues. Finally, an action hero with accurate results to violence.

However, to make it filmable, probably just making some artsy choices with montages. Although I can't imagine pulling 2 movies out of Mockingjay unless we're going for maximum emo shots of Katniss hiding in closets.

Posted by: kelsy at December 16, 2011 2:18 PM

Spoilers obviously.

I don't think that Catching Fire will be a problem. I really hope the trailers do not reveal Katniss going back in. I read the entire series with no foreknowledge and when Katniss learns she is going back in my heart broke for her. Easily in the top 5 most memorable scenes from the entire series.

All they really have to do is show how much has changed for Katniss and Peeta since the first Games, and keep the threat of President Snow so that we know that Katniss realizes she is going in to a Game that she has no hope of winning. I just hope they keep that WHAT THE FUCK JUST HAPPENED?! ending intact and if anything leave more threads dangling as the credits roll. End it on the ship with Katniss freaking out and Crane telling her she's all right but Peeta was left behind.

Mockingjay worries me. The last half is solid visually, but the 1st half is mostly Katniss and her increasingly more concerning PTSD. They are going to have to give her someone to talk to, maybe a therapist or PR coach (good use for Effie?) so that they can give voice to her increasingly pissed off and suspicious thoughts.

I think the endings will be kept the same. There is some hope at the end of Mockingjay, they are just going to have to hit that without burying the "war is hell for everyone" message of the series. Which I know simplifies it but it needs to be clear to work on screen. And I really don't think it needs to be 2 movies. One will do just fine. Trying to make that book 4 hours is going to mean the first half has some extraneous action (likely we see the rescuse of Peeta) and stretched out scenes to pad the time, ending it with Katniss manning the guns when they go to visit the district.

I think that if The Hunger Games turns out to be as strong as that trailer suggests (and that's the best trailer I've seen this year) we won't have anything to worry about for the other 2. I just really hope they don't puss out on going as dark and fucked up as the series goes.

Posted by: TylerDFC at December 16, 2011 2:20 PM

Spoilers from the books will be in my comments. I'm not kidding

I would be okay with a few more battle scenes maybe following Gale a bit more in the last novel and I would love to see first hand how he saves his and Kantiss's family from utter devastation but the ending has to stay the same. I think the ending makes sense the way it is. It's devastating and heartbreaking but I love it.

Posted by: Ashley at December 16, 2011 2:31 PM

Catching Fire was actually my favorite of the three, so I'm not really looking for a lot of changes to it. But I can see where little things could be tweaked here and there, especially with Mockingjay. As for the ending...I feel like there are better ways to get there, but the ending itself needs to be what it is. It was one of those situations where I was both thoroughly disappointed and pleased with it. The way they end is necessary, but the whole way it comes about is rather abrupt.

I have no idea how they are going to stretch this into four films. It's not Harry Potter, where you had 700 pages of necessary text. Or even The Sparkly Vampire Crap where at least, I'm told, there were two angles to tell the story from (though everyone I know that read those books says that there was no need for the last to be split into two). But Mockingjay is just not that long, and not involved enough to make up for the length.

Posted by: KatSings at December 16, 2011 2:33 PM

OK, I should clarify. It's not that I think Collins should rewrite the ending. (Although I wish I could go back in time and have her rethink a few plot devices.) It's that I think the film versions will present a better medium for her to get the story across without it feeling anticlimactic. -- Sarah C.

Posted by: Sarah Carlson at December 16, 2011 2:47 PM

Just finished reading "Hunger Games" yesterday. Liked it well enough. Haven't read the other two, so I will throw in that caveat as well.

I think there's a difference between the creator using a new format to go back and re-tweak the work to better suit what they want to say (Fight Club) and someone just going back in to remake it from head to toe (Lucas). So it's about intent as much as it is about making sure you're giving your fans what they want.

Posted by: Fredo at December 16, 2011 3:01 PM

The third book was so hard to follow because of Katniss's (rightfully earned) issues. The one PTSD scene from the 3rd book that I hope that they include is Katniss in a meeting trying to write down her demands for the council, looking up and realizing that almost an hour has passed and everyone is staring at her, realizing how mentally scarred she is.

That scene made me cry.

Posted by: jvo at December 16, 2011 3:04 PM

Mockingjay reminded me of a particular South Park. Kenny goes to heaven and uses a PSP to control the armies of heaven against the forces of hell. Instead of showing us the great battle, they show Kenny, and two angels who give running commentary on how this is the greatest battle of all time.

Mockingjay was like that It's almost like Collins couldn't figure out how to describe the battle, so instead Katniss is in her room, we read about her being in her room, and the great battle happens off-page.

Posted by: Erich at December 16, 2011 3:13 PM

Four movies is a huge mistake. Three is all you need. The books are even each written in a clearly demarcated three-act structure, for goodness sake.

I could stand to see the trial at the end of Mockingjay played out rather than told secondhand (although it didn't bother me not to have it in the book), but beyond that I really don't get why people bash that book so much as being so inferior to the other two. For me that was where all the meaty character stuff occurred and paid off. As expressed above, the ending is fine as is and tonally great.

Posted by: DarthCorleone at December 16, 2011 3:24 PM

What's sticking in my craw, right now, is Peeta. He's described as being a stockier build. He's supposed to be the son of a baker, and thus used to eating decently, and has to lift lots of things. So, he should look *stronger* (I personally think he should have a more solid build. Like the football player who's fit, but not super toned. Like you have the muscles and then there's a nice layer of baby fat to smooth it all over . .. Um, I'll be in my bunk).

Of course, being Hollywood, even that's too "Big" and so we have a guy who looks like lifting a sandwhich would be too much.

Posted by: Rowen at December 16, 2011 3:25 PM

Rowen, really? That shot of Josh Hutcherson there doesn't exactly look like he'd have trouble lifting up a hogie. Looks pretty solid to me

Posted by: Laurie at December 16, 2011 4:00 PM

He looks too thin and delicate and pretty. As a bigger guy, I'm kinda tired of being only shown as the BDF (you know that Cato and Thrush are probably going to be some jacked up looking guys. And rightly so), but NEVER pretty enough to be the love interest.

In my mind, Peeta looks like this, only younger, blonde, and *maybe* with some more padding.

http://img.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2007/10_03/sheridanDM1710_468x685.jpg

Posted by: Rowen at December 16, 2011 4:15 PM

Rowen - you've been watching too many sculpted ass sports. Speaking as a teacher and employer of late teen & early twenty-somethings, Peeta looks appropriate for the character. Unless you're in a football program designed to turn out pre-pro football stars, healthy teens aren't thick specimens.

Posted by: idiosynchronic at December 16, 2011 5:19 PM

I think they are going to have to change the ending, at least a little bit, in order to make the transition from book to screen. In the book the perspective is told entirely through Katniss, and the emotions she`s feeling. Movies don`t have the capacity to enter into a characters head like a book can and it will have to change up the style, at least in order for it to make some kind of narrative sense. I imagine a lot of what we`ll see is people attempting to explain things to Katniss when she has completely shutdown, until she can finally start to interact with people again.

(I would go into more detail, but I don`t want to spoil the books for people who haven`t read them yet.)

Posted by: Jessica at December 16, 2011 5:29 PM

Re: the size. It's true what Idiosynchronic says. You go into a high school and the girls are bigger, while the guys tend toward twerpy.

However, Hutcherson isn't naturally blond. He looks like me in 8th grade and too much Sun-In. The casting is just fucking fatal for me.

And I like all the books, fine, except first person, present tense narration gets a little...intense. Triple that for a teenaged narrator. Especially if you're reading all three in a row, no waiting. Could we see someone else's POV, at least. Perhaps the film will be able to remedy that problem, though the casting blows ass.

Posted by: ugh god at December 16, 2011 7:48 PM

"Mockingjay" is far and away the best book in the series because of the time it spends in Katniss' head experiencing PTSD. As you come to see where she is mentally in the book, she finds Peeta and then it becomes evident there won't be a happy ending. I can understand if the story is slightly altered to appease audiences, but there's no way these characters can't not end up appearing broken.

"Catching Fire" though will definitely play better as a film, the entire first half of the book is set up for what comes in the rest of the series. I personally found it straining and ultimately boring, until the second half with the action. But in a film, it can take its time to lay out the plot and keep things moving along effectively, I hope.

Posted by: Corey at December 17, 2011 2:31 AM

Movies That Were Better Than the Book:

The Godfather (1&2)
The Last of the Mohicans
Forrest Gump

I don't know, No Country for Old Men, maybe?

Posted by: Mattfactor at December 17, 2011 2:32 PM

More Effie, please.

Posted by: erin at December 17, 2011 7:41 PM

Sarah I agree. I often wondered how they will translte the other two. I briefly wondered how they would do it but I wasn't expecting four movies. The material doesn't lend itself to that many movies and I don't think its necessary. The story did lag towards the ned so i hope they can come up with something to keep people's interests

Posted by: Candy at December 17, 2011 11:02 PM

They will have to involve Prim more than the books did.

Posted by: Addicct at December 18, 2011 3:42 AM

This might be too late, but I figured I should say this anyway. I did not post the image of the rugby player as an example of exactly HOW Peeta should look, but as an example of the body type I imagined him as. Basically, I'm 6'3", I've always been a broader, more muscular type of guy. I realize that every male out there is not going to look like me, but it would be REALLY nice if Hollywood would go ahead and think outside the box a little bit. Peeta was described as being a little stocky, and very obviously strong, neither of which I see Hutchinson up there being. yes, smaller guys can be strong. So can skinnier guys. And I'm not asking for a 6 pac. I'm saying that you can be strong, attractive and a viable love interest while being taller then 5'10 and having a waist size more then 30 inches.

It's like "The Dark is Rising." In the book, Will is described as being kinda stocky. Who do they cast in that travesty of a movie? Some skinny kid.

Posted by: Rowen at December 19, 2011 9:12 AM

Man I am with you on this one. The 2nd book was very readable but not nearly as compelling as the first. The 3rd one lost me a few times - I found it confusing and it seemed to jump from events rather quickly. The ending was really disappointing - it felt very rushed and too sewn up. I think that the movies could most definitely improve on the story and flesh certain things out more. They did it with Game of Thrones - I think the TV version of Game of Thrones is MUCH better than the books. I can't get through the first one.

Posted by: cjy at December 20, 2011 5:01 PM

Mockingjay pretty much sucked. An unbiased critical analysis would show that. There are so many plot holes and contrivences in the book. It's like it's fan fiction.

And if Katniss this PTSD that everyone is talking about, she would never been able to go into combat. Haymitch with is drinking and Joanna being freaking out about water is what true PTSD looks like. Katniss is nothing but a self-centered, selfish, spoiled, whiny brat in Mockingjay. And she's a hypocrite to boot. She throughs a hissy fit about Gale's plan at the Nut but it's okay for to become judge, jury and executioner of Coin. Give me break. Ms. Collins should never be allowed to write anything again. And that includes greeting cards.

Posted by: Bigstik at January 31, 2012 11:12 PM