![]()
Breathe, Breathe In The Air, Don't Be Afraid to Care
Choke / Brian Prisco
For those of you awaiting the second coming of Tyler Durden, you’d be wise to stand in line and start fights with the rapture folk waiting for Jeebus and Kirk Cameron. Choke’s not that kind of Palahniuk. His novels tend to fall into two categories: knuckles to the asphault social anarchism and unusual explorations of uncomfortable sexuality. Choke falls assuredly into the latter category, so for all the fan boys shaving their heads in preparation for their instruction on how to render Grandma into a napalm colada, you best just go back and wait in the house on Paper Street. Choke is a decent film that’s well-acted and entertaining. It just suffers from a narrative that’s thinner than the stars of 90210: Voyager.
Adapted from one of the least endearing novels in a rather auspicious canon, Choke’s a difficult sell. It’s the story of Victor Mancini (Sam Rockwell), who spends his days working as a historical reenactor in a colonial Williamsburg-ish village and spending the rest of his time doing more humping than a camel assemblyman. You see, he’s a non-repentant sex-addict (Palahniuk loooooooooves those anonymous “Hi My Name Is” meetings), who shirks the stale coffee and folding chairs for sweaty encounters in desperate locations: airplane bathrooms, tiled floors, nursing home tubs. He’s also a con-man who fakes choking spells in restaurants in order to get people to become responsible for his life and then send him money. Money he uses to keep up payments on the nursing home for his dementia ridden mother, Ida (Anjelica Huston).
First time writer-director Clark Gregg makes the bold choice to let the other major story threads act as seasoning as he focuses the meat of the movie on Victor’s relationship with women, and especially with his mother. When you’re given talents like Sam Rockwell and Anjelica Huston, you fucking use them. Gregg uses, and a little overuses, flashbacks to show Victor’s strange relationship with his conspiracy theorist criminal mother, who constantly steals him away from foster parents. Because of his mother’s weirdly doled out affection, we come to understand Victor’s inability to love anyone.
Rockwell shines as Victor, crafting him as this sort of endearing lothario. He’s a complete shitheel, an absolutely bitter bastard who manages to come across as a loveable fuckup. Normally, a character who goes around trying to cram his dick in everything always has to be some sort of alpha male. Victor Mancini is a fucker, not a fighter. He oozes charm. He plays wonderfully off of Anjelica Huston’s Ida, who manages to ply more emotions in a single character than most of the other A-list actresses do in their entire careers. She’s loving, but she’s also fierce, and she can convey entire speeches or moments with just her eyes. She does all the heavy lifting in her scenes with Rockwell, which makes us understand why a man who doesn’t care about anything would bring canneloni to his bedridden mother even when she thinks he’s someone else.
What intrigues me most about the film is that Gregg manages to underutilize the talent pool he gathered for the supporting cast, which normally makes me gnash my teeth and bite the recess lady’s breast, but here, in this strange film, it works. This is because each portion of the story is compartmentalized. Rarely do the different parts of Victor’s life blend together, so we’re able to spend specific time with each character. Victor’s mother’s doctor, Paige Marshall, is played by Kelly Macdonald, who’s best known as Josh Brolin’s wife and the last itch Anton Chigurh has to scratch at the end of No Country for Old Men. The sex group counselor is almost a throw away part, except for being portrayed by one of my all time favorite character actors, Joel Grey. I guess it helps when your daughter Jeannie Bueller is giving the ol’ Save Ferris to the director.
The strongest secondary plot involves the village where Victor and his chronically masturbating sidekick Denny (Brad William Henke) work. The village is lorded over by an officious and self-important prick, a choice part Gregg saved for himself. Which is perfectly acceptable, since Gregg is more readily known for his acting skills. He was last seen as Agent Coulson from SHIELD in Iron Man. Gregg almost always plays FBI agents or police officers, which is the only way to distinguish him on the scale of Daily Show Matt Walsh to the Dad from Six Feet Under. He’s perfect as the uptight douchebag who rules the colony with an assistant managerial aire. Bijou Phillips surprised me as Ursula, the bitchy milkmaid,mostly because she’s almost unrecognizable in a role where she manages to stay vertical most of the time and not affect some sort of fly-girl dialect. Without cornrows and someone’s baby stuck to her hip, I couldn’t even tell it was her. Now I like Bijou, so I hope she’s somehow pulled a Freaky Friday on Christina Ricci and starts taking on some more interesting roles, while Wednesday starts getting all kinds of naked.
While Rockwell carries the film, occasionally handing the cross off to Huston, the biggest problem is there isn’t much else going on in the movie. A majority of the novel is about the fake choking sessions, where Victor goes into restaurants and stuffs food down his throat to suffocate, then he gets rescued. The idea is that people now own his life, and will pay to take care of him, because it makes them feel like they are heroes. The choking happens two or three times in the movie, but it’s almost an afterthought, and gets the most cursory of glimpses. He never capitalizes on any of the weird social commentary of the novel. Gregg seemed convinced the wildness of the characters would float most of the movie. And it nearly works. It’s just that the movie seems hell bent on alienating everyone. People who wanted Fight Club are going to be bored by the mellow indie content. Fans of the book are going to be pissed off that all the Palahnookie medical terminology and emergency codes have been virtually excised. Mainstream viewers are going to be put off by the dreary tone and overall darkness of the story. It’s kind of like Gregg tried not to appease anyone.
Again, this is not to say that the movie is bad. It’s pretty good. It just feels slightly off-kilter. It’s like watching two brothers kiss each other in a hello greeting. They’re family, so I guess it’s natural, but it just seems bizarre. The entire movie has the look and feel of dinginess, almost like you feel a little dirty for having come in contact with it. There are plenty of laughs, but it’s hardly an out loud yukfest. It’s a successful dark comedy, managing to dance along the blade between schlocky sentimentality and crass black humor. This movie managed to get everything right, it just feels like there’s something slightly wrong with it, and I can’t quite put my finger on it.
Brian Prisco is a warrior-poet from the valley of North Hollywood, by way of Philadelphia. He wastes most of his life in desk jobs, biding his time until he finally becomes an actor, a writer, or cannon fodder in the inevitable zombie invasion. He can be found shaking his fist and angrily shouting at clouds on his blog, The Gospel According to Prisco.
Whiskey Baby Ninja Star T-Shirts on Sale
Yogi Bear Movie |
| Pajiba Love 10/02/08
|
Comments
I like roofie coladas better than napalm coladas.
Posted by: Anna "Knife Pile" von Beaverplatz at October 2, 2008 10:37 AM
The previews for this make it look interesting. Particularly when the girl from Miss Congeniality (shut up, it's a cute movie and I like it) says, "when you hit someone with a knife, that's STABBING."
Posted by: Pea at October 2, 2008 10:54 AM
Exactly how I felt about this movie. My friends and I really liked it, but there was something just off about it.
Plus, we were the only ones laughing in the theatre. There really were some laugh-out-loud moments...
Posted by: Trouble at October 2, 2008 10:54 AM
It's ashpalt.
I liked the book, but it was the book that started giving me the feeling that Palahniuk as an author is a sheep in wolf's clothing. His stories have a lot of transgressive window-dressing and outrageous elements, but they always seem to boil down to reinforcing "traditional values"--monogamous hetero romance, re-establishing or reinforcing family bonds, that kind of thing--and by the end, you know you're going to get a reasonably happy ending.
That's not to say he's not worth reading, by any means...but don't wake me again until they make a movie of Survivor.
P.S. Does the movie use that junk about Jesus' DNA?
Posted by: Jerce at October 2, 2008 11:01 AM
Actually, Jerce me dear, it's asphalt. I should know, I worked on a paving crew as a youth.
Also, I've never read the book, but you had me at Sam Rockwell, aka the non-breast-related reason to watch Charlie's Angels.
Posted by: TK at October 2, 2008 11:11 AM
reinforcing "traditional values"
Is this a bad thing? I rather like that all of his heroes are generally searching, albiet sloppily, lazily, self-destructively, despairingly - for a better world.
Nihiism is boring shit that gives rise to shitty pop music.
Also re: happy ending - see 'Diary.'
Posted by: twig at October 2, 2008 11:16 AM
Well, let's face it, Palahniuk seems to have based his entire career on alienating people and being "different" than everyone else. Does that make him a bad writer? No. It just means he will never, ever be a rich man as long as he's alive. But he sure writes some humorous social commentaries.
Posted by: Audiosuede at October 2, 2008 11:18 AM
"It's like watching two brothers kiss each other in a hello greeting. They're family, so I guess it's natural, but it just seems bizarre."
I'm glad I wasn't drinking coffee while I read this; that line is still making me laugh.
Posted by: eat my shorts at October 2, 2008 11:20 AM
This is the first Palahniuk book I ever read, so it has sentimental value for me. I'm gonna go see it.
I'm not going to get REAAAAAALLLLLY excited until they make a movie out of Diary, though.
Posted by: Courtie at October 2, 2008 11:30 AM
I agree with Jerce. Not about the asphalt part, but the survivor as a movie part. That's easily my favorite Palahnuik novel.
Also, can I get a ruling on the correct pronunciation of Palahnuik? Is it pal-an-ik? pale-en-new-ik? Pal-en-nwik?
Posted by: Marra at October 2, 2008 11:31 AM
The book was a trip. I'm curious to see how the concept will be adapted to film. As the girl who loaned it to me said, he's more stylish than anything else, so I guess that lends itself pretty well to Hollywood. I like Rockwell, but would have imagined somebody darker in the part.
Well, and more Italian.
Posted by: Eep at October 2, 2008 11:38 AM
On the flip side, Anjelica Huston is the perfect casting choice for her part.
Posted by: Eep at October 2, 2008 11:40 AM
Wait...the review for Choke is finally up? Let us celebrate with the adding of chocolate to milk.
Posted by: Dave at October 2, 2008 11:40 AM
Too...many...pop culture references...
Posted by: Girlnone at October 2, 2008 11:53 AM
Actually, Jerce me dear, it's asphalt.
Well, shit. Undone in my smugitude by a fucking typo. What could be more embarrassing?
Also, twig, I don't think it's a bad thing or that it makes him a bad storyteller. I like his stuff. But I do think it's weird that he has this reputation as being an iconoclast bad-boy sort of author, yet all you have to do is scratch a thin surface of "Lookit how I'm pushing the envelope! Lookit how outrageous this is!" to see that his tales generally reinforce the usual traditional views of how to find happiness.
Posted by: Jerce at October 2, 2008 12:08 PM
Aw, my intent was never to embarrass!
Posted by: TK at October 2, 2008 12:22 PM
Victor sounds like a perfect role for David Duchoveny.
Posted by: Cindy at October 2, 2008 1:07 PM
"Survivor" popped my Palahniuk cherry, but "Lullaby" is my favorite, no contest. I am intrigued that, unlike his other works, you dont have to battle between disgust and adoration with the main characters. I also love "Invisible Monsters", but it doesnt give me the same literary satisfaction.
Posted by: MuggleMaggie at October 2, 2008 2:22 PM
I enjoyed "Lullaby" immensely but I feel like it would be a complete disaster if it ever went to film.
Apparently Chuck (since I have NO IDEA how to say OR spell his last name, even though I've read all his works - except "Snuff", I'm not brave enough to go there yet) thought that "Choke" was a better flick than "Fight Club". Upon consideration, this made no sense because if he's talking about staying true to the novel, then "Fight Club" definitely beats this one; but as far as the overall tone of the work, he thought "Choke"s was captured better than "Fight Club". Whatever dude. You just didn't like that it went crazy mainstream. Don't lie.
Posted by: Kash at October 2, 2008 2:52 PM
One of my favorite books, although I don't love it as much as I love Diary or Lullaby (my personal favorite book). I was way over-excited to see this was being made into a movie. I always wonder what gets cut from the book, because I am afraid my favorite part of the book may not be here. I guess I shall have to watch and find out. So color me slightly optimistic.
Posted by: DemonWaterPolo at October 2, 2008 3:24 PM
I loved Sam Rockwell as the head thug kid in Ninja Turtles 1.
"We have a loyalty to the Shredder!" You tell 'em, buddy.
Posted by: Lucas at October 2, 2008 4:45 PM
"bite the recess lady's breast"
You almost made me spit some wild turkey 101 manhattan all over my keyboard. Almost.
Now I'm going to listen to Eddie Vedder and smoke some bongs.
Posted by: Roaddog at October 2, 2008 11:05 PM
It is pronounced like Paula-Nick just without a break for the dash. Just go look him up on Youtube. There is an interview where he says his own name at the beginning. I'm too lazy to get the link, and as you all well know, this is a mispronunciation that rarely comes up...I mean, unless you hang out with a whole shit load of pretentious people.
Posted by: pissant at October 3, 2008 12:04 PM
Also, what the fuck took so long for this review? I saw this movie six days ago and specifically avoided this site because I didn't want even the title of the review to taint my viewing of it.
Oh, but was it ever tainted. The project was off by a few degrees which caused a black strip to cover fifteen feet of the left side and put fifteen feet of the film in the curtains. Once that got fixed, I swear it was out of focus. I actually left the theater to complain, which completely fucks up my viewing and irritated me to no end.
I was disappointed with it, but I think I would have been neutral if all that shit wouldn't have happened. I guess I was looking for Fight Club 2: Tyler Gets Married...
What would be next? "Fight Club 3: The Durden's Are Having a Baby"? And after that?
Posted by: pissant at October 3, 2008 12:10 PM
The ending of the book was great actually, I'm just thinking about it right now. I wonder how they played that out in the movie. I'll probably rent this. Is it me or is there absolutely NOTHING to watch in the theatres these days?!
Posted by: ph at October 6, 2008 2:30 AM

