web
counter
 

The Ungrateful Dead and the Judgmental Living: Why Celebrity Deaths Bring Out the Worst In Us

By Courtney Enlow | Posted Under Celebrities Are Better than You | Comments (66)



up-G8M_AmyWinehouse01_lrg.jpg

When someone of note dies, everyone has an opinion. Be it an actress post-mortally deified despite a mediocre career, a writer vilified as an overpraised hack after leaving the mortal coil, or a joke of a model/actress made a tragic angel when her light finally went out, each of us has a distinct reaction and perspective.

And those reactions and perspectives litter comment threads the internet over each and every time, exhaustively degrading into belittling pissing matches.

The death of a famous individual garners a great deal of attention. At times, that attention is frankly unearned, a rose-colored glass panel over a life perhaps less exceptional than we decide it was after the fact. On rarer occasions, and often due to those sunny reactions of the former, we turn on them the second they’re gone.

However we choose to remember these people, there is someone out there with the opposing view. And because it’s the internet, you’re going to hear it.

To some, Winehouse was a fuck-up who never took the help so accessible to someone of her stature. Others wished and prayed for a day she’d somehow find her way to the other side. To me, what makes the death of Amy Winehouse so tragic is this: she was never going to be okay. Her life and death showed that, for some, the sickness won’t get better. It never can. There is only succumb. For some, it’s a birthright, for others, an acquisition, but there are those for whom there can be only one way for the story to end. That’s what aches about this girl, and all like her. It’s not that Amy Winehouse didn’t get help, it’s that help was never going to come for Amy Winehouse. From the moment she achieved both spectacular fame and the deadliest drugs, I believe within the same six month period or so, this was it. This was always going to be it.

So, why shouldn’t we grieve? Why shouldn’t we be saddened, or at least mildly melancholied? Why should those who experience feelings of any kind be judged as foolish and vapid for caring about the life of a human being who in some way mattered to them, just because that person happened to be a celebrity?

What is it about not caring that a celebrity has passed that makes people feel so goddamn superior? The deaths in Oslo were an absolutely appalling tragedy, but there is room to feel different kinds of sad about both, and taking to Twitter to share that caring about one of those things makes you insipid and wrong and the other makes you smart and correct is just shitty. Perhaps the death of one doesn’t matter to you, but don’t use the deaths of many as a badge of special acumen for yourself. Those who died in the most tragic and horrifying way possible deserve better than to make you feel good about yourself by denigrating someone else.

An excellent point was brought up in the comments for yesterday’s Pajiba Love, the post that obviously inspired this. Ms. Anna von Beav made mention that, for a number of people, junkies are not people. And that’s absolutely true. I’m not sure if it’s just simple ignorance, or, to the other extreme, that addiction has touched their lives and they have been stripped of sympathy for those who can’t overcome. And I’m not going to get on my white stallion and tell them they’re wrong, because I’ve been on all ends of the spectrum myself. Everyone is entitled to an opinion. Mine is that addiction is a complicated and, at times, impossible thing. It is not as easy as “getting help” or “going to rehab.” It can be, but it usually isn’t. Those who hit rock bottom and found their way back should be lauded for doing so. Those who never could and never did deserve some semblance of human kindness, the likes of which they were never able to achieve toward themselves.

This is not about respect for the dead. We spent that nickel last time. This is about looking inward. After a full year at Pajiba, I still get shit about caring about celebrities in the slightest, even in jest. And, in all honesty, I don’t care about most of them. I have little to no time for the Snookis and Kardashians and Lohans of the world (and I fully expect comments asking why Lohan is different from Winehouse, and I’ve said it before: she’s not an addict; she’s an irresponsible, entitled asshole. There really is a difference). But, like Heath Ledger, when a talented person whose work we enjoy leaves this world, never again to entertain us, and perhaps sent there because of the demons acquired while entertaining us, we’re allowed to be bothered by it. We’re allowed to mourn, as silly as some find it. And if you don’t, that’s fine. But must we fight about it every single time? Hasn’t it gotten old yet? Does anyone win?

That’s enough for now. We’ll pick up exactly where we left off next time this happens.









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



I Have Nothing Left to Fear: Move Over G+, Bryan Singer's H+ Is Nigh | Assiduously Assessing The Best Asses In Hollywood









Comments

I went on an unfollow spree on Twitter this weekend. Assholes everywhere.

Posted by: Will at July 26, 2011 2:07 PM

Should we copy and paste all the comments from yesterday's Pajiba Love and save everyone the trouble?

Posted by: THRILLHO at July 26, 2011 2:20 PM

Or we could just agree that were only sad about a Celeb dying if we liked that Celeb alive?

Posted by: logan at July 26, 2011 2:28 PM

This is EXACTLY what I've been saying. I have felt melancholy about Winehouse's death all weekend and I have no idea why. I had to DEFEND my FB updates and posts because people could not find the room in their hearts and dismissed her because she is a junkie and that you should celebrate life. Sure that is all fine and dandy, but you cannot ignore that it is a wasted life and it's a shame that she could not get the help she deserved. Also, I feel that addicts have a very hard time doing this and they often succumb to the demons of their addictions so often, it's easier for them to live in their own mess. Amy was talented, so was Heath...and it's totally okay to mourn them even if they are celebrities. It does not make them less human. Celebrity tends to make one immortal, and if they make a mistake and are less than perfect, they are callously demonized for being human. There is something wrong with this...sure I have no time for assholes like Lohan. But talented individuals who happen to be celebrities are not immortal nor perfect. NO ONE is, and it's a shame that people have to feel all superior and cast blame on those who are vulnerable to their addictions.

Posted by: Gigi at July 26, 2011 2:32 PM

The way i see it people only give a shit if it's a so-called celebrity that bites it. Just like "white-girl-missing" syndrome. Just another manifestation of a society with some fucked-up priorities. No one gives a shit about the junkie down the street that had had the same potential and aspirations as Mrs. Thing over in Britain. Charity starts at home.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at July 26, 2011 2:34 PM

In our society, we are asked to have a position on everyone and everything. When you have the death of someone famous, there's going to be a shared connection with others who supported or disliked that famous person. An event like a death gives people the opportunity to unite with those of similar thinking and share their position. That's even easier now with the Internet and social media despite the fact that nuance and complexity fade into larger, simpler stances.

Posted by: Fredo at July 26, 2011 2:39 PM

There's nothing wrong with not mourning the passing of a celebrity. What I don't understand are the people who mock others for being sad. If you feel some sort of connection to a celebrity, some small thread that may be tenuous but nonetheless real like simply enjoying their work, what's wrong about feeling sad that they've passed away? Who the f*ck are you (no one here, just speaking in general) to deride someone for that? If complete strangers on the internet are posting messages, what's the big deal? Go on about your business and leave them be.

Posted by: MelBivDevoe at July 26, 2011 2:42 PM

I think there's an interesting discussion in here about our society's increasing tendency to outright blame others for their lot in life, instead of looking at the contextual factors that can and often do have just as big of an impact as one's personal actions. This is pretty much the foundation for current Tea Party rhetoric, and an extension of the 'good in theory but totally unrealistic and actually pretty exclusionary' bootstrap mentality our country was founded on. Our media also fuels this with celebrities, as they feed us bad celebrity behavior to endlessly scrutinize yet we fail to address the toxic culture they are so permeated in that encourages them to be this way in the first place. We have truly lost the ability to see the human being in our neighbor and fellow man, and people can be as snarky as they want and claim to hate everyone equally, but I tend not to find this "joke" very funny anymore. I don't think we're handling our constantly changing and complex world very well, leading people to plant themselves firmly in the black or white corners and refusing to see any of the gray in between.

Posted by: katy at July 26, 2011 2:45 PM

On Barbado Slim's theme -

Random people who die are just that....random people. A celebrity by nature (or design?), has achieved something that all those other faceless dying people haven't...they created some sort of connection with you. Maybe not a positive sort of connection but a connection nonetheless. The thing you feel when they're no longer around whether it's sadness, contempt or whatever is infinitely more measurable than the death of any other person you've never achieved that connection with.

Posted by: Neoprod at July 26, 2011 2:45 PM

Rock bottom for some people is very low. For my spouse's step-mother it was brain damage (it is difficult for her to create new memories; she no idea that she is divorced, has grandchildren, and has been hospitalized until she is reminded). For a dear friend of mine, rock bottom is the recent realization that he is tens-of-thousands of dollars in debt and homeless (crashing with some dude does not mean you have a place to live). He's moving home to get help.

For Winehouse, rock bottom was death.

Junkies are people. Amy Winehouse was a person and it won't just be her family that mourns her passing. Her music was awesome. I know that might not be a popular opinion, but I loved every song she wrote or performed. She had a smoothe, sexy voice; a cool, kind-of old style; and devilishly addictive beats. She joins a tragic legacy of other musicians who just rocked too hard and met an early death at age 27.

Hopefully it will be a lesson for the next bewitching belle.

Posted by: Anonymous for this at July 26, 2011 2:46 PM

Nicely stated, Courtney.

Posted by: , at July 26, 2011 2:54 PM

I can't do any more for the junkie down the street than I could for Amy Winehouse, which is show some compassion.

Posted by: Anna von Beav at July 26, 2011 2:58 PM

I fail to see the connection between Winehouse's death and those who died in Oslo, Norway. One person (and her celebrity status is irrelevant) died because of her own self-destructive actions over a long period of time, the others died instantaneously because of someone else's evil actions.

It's not even apple and oranges. I'll save my sympathies for those who wanted to live and yet had their lives taken away from them versus someone who voluntarily frittered away hers for reasons that no one in this forum can truly claim to know for certain. About the only good I can see coming from this would be if those among the living saw this for the avoidable fate that it is and attempt to take precautionary measures to make sure it doesn't happen to them. Equating it to being shot by a sociopath is not it.

If that makes me somehow judgmental, so be it.

Posted by: bleujayone at July 26, 2011 3:01 PM

Holy crap, Courtney, that's beautifully well-written.

My uncle was one of those who hit rock bottom, but fought tooth and nail to get back clean. He was drug-free for a blessed three years, but was found dead from an overdose in the apartment of one of his old "friends."

There was only one way his story was going to end, like Ms. Winehouse's. His wasn't public like hers, but there's not a damn thing wrong with feeling pain and sympathy for her family.

Posted by: Amynae at July 26, 2011 3:06 PM

@bleujayone

It is apples and oranges indeed, but you are still missing the point. Winehouse suffered from addiction. Addiction is an illness. If someone dies from lung cancer, and that someone smoked a pack a day for 20 years, would you not mourn them? Would you simply dismiss their death as being their own fault and deride others for mourning that person?

You seem perfectly content with being judgmental but that is a terrible way to go through life. You can control that far more easily than an addict can control their addiction.

Posted by: Lena at July 26, 2011 3:14 PM

You don't have to "save" your sympathy. You can generate enough sympathy for everyone who dies tragically.

I know. It's soooo hard, right? Being human is such a drag sometimes.

Posted by: superasente at July 26, 2011 3:17 PM

Thank you, Courtney. I didn't respond to the large number of Facebook friends who made the obvious "Rehab" comment, but I wanted to. She _did_ go, and it wasn't enough, as it often isn't, and that's sad. End of story.

Posted by: Samantha at July 26, 2011 3:33 PM

This was lovely. Thank you.

Posted by: AmbroseKalifornia at July 26, 2011 3:37 PM

Bravo and thank you, Courtney, because you were able to so beautifully put into words everything I've been feeling while sifting through some of the rather callous and insensitive comments re: Amy Winehouse's death. Thing is, no matter what your opinion, addiction is so much more complicated and heartbreaking than most will ever know and looking down on those who suffer the affliction or those who find the death of anyone who never pulled him/herself out of that very dark place just shows a real lack of understanding and knowledge of this disease.

One may think addicts are stupid for the choices they do or do not make but, in the end, anyone who has been in the grips of true addiction or has watched someone spiral out of control due to addiction knows, the means to an ends is simply to not feel or simply mitigate pain with substance. Call it cowardly, pound your chest that you've faced life and all its troubles head-on if you'd like but it doesn't make it any less a sad and devastating situation.

After I heard of Amy Winehouse's death I immediately thought of a rather eye-opening experience I had with my father; this was a turning point in our relationship where I went from wondering and begging why don't you just stop being an addict and man up to thinking I know it's hard but try your hardest, please. It was the day that I told my father that I wished I could cut my veins and bleed out all of the heartache and pain that having him in my life made me feel and he simply responded with I live every day of my life wishing I could cut my veins and bleed out all of the heartache and pain that being me makes me feel.

And so I think of Amy, trying to mitigate the pain not of being a famous superstar (though that might have compounded the situation) or of being someone with a gifted voice but simply of being Amy in her own skin, with her own thoughts and experiences and her own personal, private and unbearable pain (I might not know the why of the pain but it was apparent that it was there) and I can't help but hope that, in death, she is finally felt the peace that so eluded her in life.

So R.I.P. Amy Winehouse, a beloved daughter, sister and human being who connected with others but was never quite able to find her worth or place among us.

Posted by: smijca at July 26, 2011 3:45 PM

My only beef with this whole issue is that I never found her music all that appealing. But every artists has their fans, non-fans, and detractors. Let me tell you, if I had been around when Hendrix kicked it, I'd be feeling much the same way that you fans feel lately.

However, her spiral into addiction is something many of us can relate to, and is the real tragedy here. It's undeniable the girl had talent, and to see that talent not only wasted, but scuttled is a loss to the music community as a whole. Worse still, you have people who don't understand this disease saying some awfully childish and ignorant things all over the internet. And for what?

It sucks when people die. It sucks when that death is the result of mistakes they have made. It sucks even worse when it could have been prevented.

I actually don't think this is the only way it could have went, though. You have to believe that people can beat their addictions. You have to believe that there is SOME way to end the dependence, even if it's the 20th, or 50th attempt to do so. The addicted need that support to get and stay sober. The problem is, sometimes you don't have the time to find the method that works - this is one of those cases. I only hope that this can serve as a cautionary tale to even a few lucky souls who use it to motivate themselves out of addiction, or to never get to this point in the first place. Maybe that way some good can come of it.

Posted by: Bert at July 26, 2011 3:46 PM

[I strike this comment from the record for lack of humor, thoughfulness, and excessive assholery. Don't be a douche, Pancake. -- DR]

Posted by: Mr. Pancake at July 26, 2011 3:50 PM

I see your point, BSlim, but just because we express sympathy for a dead addict on a board where that specific death is one of the main topics, and don't leap at the opportunity to soapbox on behalf of addicts everywhere, doesn't mean we don't feel compassion for the non-famous sufferers and their loved ones as well.


Now for my main point*(Okay, extremely sleep-deprived today due to insane work schedule, so bear with me. Will try really hard not to misspeak or say something stupid here:)*

For my part, one of the main things that made Winehouse's death sad to me was how it reminded me of other people who need help (and there are several I'm close to), who either haven't tried help or haven't found a recovery path that works for them. My mother is a non-recovered bipolar alcoholic who's made several unsuccessful recovery attempts and suffered countless close calls (many of which happened well before I hit puberty), so when I read about an addict or mental illness sufferer who ended up dead because of it, I get bummed out on a few different levels. Think "another one bites the dust" in a way that hits too close to home.

I couldn't post on yesterday's board because, when you grow up with the mentally ill and/or addicted, you can develop a really short fuse when people discuss those issues in a callous/cavalier yet smug/superior sort of way. It hurt and angered me past the point where I was capable of discussing the matter rationally.

Soooo...I'm very glad Courtney wrote this piece. I would encourage folks to also read the Russel Brand piece, if they haven't already, as he makes some excellent points about being and caring about an addict.

Finally, I would ask people, when discussing complex and painful personal matters on message boards, especially in a tightly knit community like this one, to remember that without firsthand experience, there's a lot you probably don't know about it. Hell, even if you do have firsthand experience, it's important to remember that when it happens, it's different for everyone. It leaves a different mark one everyone. My two siblings and I grew up with the same mother, and yet we all came away with unique baggage. Go figure.

Basically, please don't condemn in ignorance.

/soapbox

Posted by: ShinyKate at July 26, 2011 3:54 PM

Well said, thank you. What bothers me the most is the "self-inflicted, her own fault", etc. comments. Addiction is a DISEASE. No one takes their first sip of wine with the thought, "Damn, I can't wait to be an alcoholic." Same thing with drugs. No one chooses to be an addict. It is a disease and a very tragic, sad one.

Posted by: M at July 26, 2011 3:55 PM

You seem perfectly content with being judgmental but that is a terrible way to go through life. You can control that far more easily than an addict can control their addiction.

Very well said, Lena!

Posted by: branded at July 26, 2011 3:55 PM

My favorite of the mass amounts of celebrity "tweets" that came out was from Marlee Matlin. She described her as a "great talent".

How would you know, Marlee?

How would you know?

Posted by: Clark at July 26, 2011 4:14 PM

@M - "Addiction is a DISEASE. No one takes their first sip of wine with the thought, "Damn, I can't wait to be an alcoholic." Same thing with drugs. No one chooses to be an addict. It is a disease and a very tragic, sad one."

Actually, no, taking a sip of wine for the first time is very different from trying crack/cocaine/heroin. They are such dangerous and awful drugs and you can't develop an addiction to them without being stupid enough to try them first. I know people who have overcome addictions and it is possible. Especially if you have resources and support, which many addicted people don't. Of course you can have sympathy for people who succumb to their addictions and are never able to overcome them, but it really doesn't compare at all to those people who were gunned down in Oslo - they wanted to live and didn't even get a chance.

Posted by: LK at July 26, 2011 4:28 PM

Rupert Murdoch has released a statement saying he's touched by all the messages left on Amy's phone.

Posted by: dorquemada at July 26, 2011 4:31 PM

LK - At what point did I compare someone succumbing to addiction to those who lost their lives in Oslo?

Why is their this need right now to say draw comparisons between the two? I am watching someone I love very, vey much lose their battle with addiction. Thus, the Amy Winehouse news struck a nerve with me. Does this mean I didn't mourn for those in Oslo? Of course not. I was horrified and baffled and at a loss to even comprehend what happened to them. But... those are two different events, two different news stories and I don't see the need to constantly bring up one to bash down the other.

Posted by: M at July 26, 2011 4:32 PM

@ Mr Pancake.


Congratulations on winning today's Asshole Award, please submit your address and bank details to receive your prize.

Posted by: frank_247 at July 26, 2011 4:36 PM

Certain people around here take joy in pushing other people's buttons. This is, sadly, going to happen everytime a celebrity dies. Did you pay attention to who brought up Ryan Dunn yesterday and how they did it? They were trolling (different from being at troll, this is when an otherwise reasonable person decides to mess around with people for the lulz). It was intentional. People responded. Other people popped in to try and burn the place down. It's the Pajiba way.

Be thankful it wasn't a race war.

Actually, no. I miss the race wars. At least those were absurd at face value. These "fuck you for grieving/not grieving/calling someone out for their illegal actions/how dare you say a dead person committed a crime" battles are just sad.

Posted by: Robert at July 26, 2011 4:39 PM

Rupert Murdoch has released a statement saying he's touched by all the messages left on Amy's phone.

dorquemada, you have been the bright spot in this somber, at times heated discussion. Rock on!

Posted by: smijca at July 26, 2011 4:41 PM

bleujayone said, over on the tangled thread of ugliness, "Ms. Winehouse had throngs of people telling her daily she needed to get help (I'm sure there were a number of others who encouraged her otherwise but that's another discussion)."

It's really NOT another discussion if the topic is choice. Do we withhold our sympathy because of an addict's choices? I guarantee you that for every concerned loved one who tried to help, there were a throng of leeches enabling her behavior for their own sick ends. The Road Manager may be trying his best to keep her in the green room with the healthy snacks and the bottled water, but there are a hundred other runners/ groupies/ amateur local crew fucks who just want a chance to party with a rock star. And you can't chain her in the green room. Once the tour is over and she's back at home, the problem gets worse, because there are even fewer wet nurses around in real life. But the leeches are always thirsty. Your non-celebrity addict has a glimmer of hope for sobriety. But there's so much working against the rock star addicts that it's a wonder ANY of them ever make it. (I confess I know very little about movie stars, but I assume the situations are similar.)

Compassion in this case would certainly not be out of the question.

Posted by: Young_Grandma_Ben at July 26, 2011 4:49 PM

Sorry, I just realized there is a lot of YOU written in that last bit and I wanted to clarify - the post was not AIMED at bleujayone, I was just using that quote as a jumping-off point.

Posted by: Young_Grandma_Ben at July 26, 2011 5:03 PM

Its no secret I've been disillusioned with this site and its recent penchant for bringing female writers. I felt as though the writing suffered.
But with this piece, Courtney (I assume is female-but it doesn't matter) has redeemed both the site and her gender.
As a 45 year old fart with an attitude, I'm a bit out of my zone with you crazy kids of today and your pants around your ass fashions. But Amy's music touched me deeply and I thought she was incredibly talented. I waited for her to catch her shit and do more with her gifts but i knew it wasn't to be.
I find myself looking at her pictures and feeling sad, listening to her music and feeling everything. I read this piece and felt not as alone.
Nice job, Courtney.

Posted by: mothy at July 26, 2011 5:50 PM

Courtney, I think this is my favorite of your columns. Nice job!

Posted by: DarthCorleone at July 26, 2011 6:01 PM

As someone pointed out in the other thread, mourning someone's passing and yet thinking they were stupid and self-destructive are not mutually exclusive.

And my original point stands (as barbadoslim reiterated): the only difference between Amy and some other drug-waster you'd turn your back on is that she had a talent. I wasn't arguing that her talent nullified the right to mourn her, I was arguing that those same people wouldn't mourn the meth head who stole your plumbing. That's just another Darwin Award in someone's blog. Selective sympathy is cowardly and self-serving.

Posted by: Protoguy at July 26, 2011 6:19 PM

And just to cement the asshole hat further on my own head: when someone says "I want to empty my veins to relieve the pain" or some such... the choice then is to get some fucking psychological help. Not blame addiction or our parents or the world. The only one who can help you is you. We all have access to counselors, psychologists, churches, whatever. Instead of relinquishing our free will and our own damn brains and bodies, take control and do something other than pass the bowl of pain around.

Posted by: Protoguy at July 26, 2011 7:02 PM

I wish I was king instead of god.

Posted by: mothy at July 26, 2011 7:08 PM

Protoguy,
Enjoy your cancer!
How's that for assholish?

Posted by: mothy at July 26, 2011 7:12 PM

I fail to see how advising someone with serious emotional issues to seek help is the wrong thing to do. But it does seem in line with a lot of what I've read so far. Enjoy your victimhood.

Posted by: Protoguy at July 26, 2011 7:16 PM

Because when you judge someone, you just show your lack of compassion for your fellow man. You're just looking down your nose at other people and judging their handling of their problems. You don't know what makes them tick.
Neil Young said it best, "Although my problems are meaningless, that dont' make them go away."

Obviously, you've taken your battle with your illness as a badge or medallion of courage or whatever and it must make you think you are somehow superior to everyone - or at least those that suffer from "shallower issues".

But what's the use to explain it to you, you've got your mind made up....made up of cancer cells.
Have a nice day, darling.

Posted by: mothy at July 26, 2011 7:26 PM

Protoguy, I don't think I would rejoice in the death of the crackhead who stole something from me. I'd still feel bad for them. I've seen a lot of crime and I've seen where most criminals come from. To be honest, I don't know how they survived.

I kindly ask you not to immediately assume that we wouldn't feel compassion for someone who did us wrong. They're still human, and feeling compassion for them makes us human, too.

I agree with you that we have to help ourselves, but it takes most people a while to get to that conclusion. We don't all function in the same ways.

Posted by: Sofia at July 26, 2011 7:52 PM

Jeez ...

The thing is, being an addict (of any kind) is extremely selfish. Up to a point, it IS a choice. To be fucked up. To be a fuck-up. People don't expect much of you when you're an addict. Just getting up in the morning and being coherent is seen as praise-worthy, when everyone else (who isn't an addict) is expected to get up and be quite a bit more than just coherent every single day. I think (just spitballing here) I see what some people's objections are to expressing mournful sympathy about someone too selfish to take help when it's offered, over and over.

Having said all that, there is something physiological to addiction, ie, in the sense that it's not just about wanting to get high, it's about NEEDING to get high or drunk or whatever. Some guy just wrote a book about it: http://www.npr.org/2011/06/23/137348338/compass-of-pleasure-why-some-things-feel-so-good

Interesting discussion of why pleasurable things can turn into destructive addictions. Chemicals change your brain. Winehouse and other addicts are essentially brain-damaged.

Now, having said that, I do also understand why someone who is actually suffering (like from cancer, for example) would read about someone choosing to get fucked up every day to deal with the "pain" of life and feel contempt, rather than sympathy. Lots of people have pain, both physical and psychological. They don't all use it as an excuse to be fucked up all the time.

Posted by: Slash at July 26, 2011 8:03 PM

If someone dies due to a drug overdose after robbing me, they havne't precluded themselves from receiving my sympathy because of the theft; and you're being presumptuous to assume that they would. Robbing me and dying aren't related incidents. I can both be pissed that I was robbed, and sympathetic for the tragedy. Anger and sadness are hardly mutually exclusive feelings.

Posted by: superasente at July 26, 2011 8:14 PM

Sofia, you saved me from writing a lengthy and probably less than lady-like response so I thank you for that because, well, what you said.

And Protoguy, the slice open veins statement was said during frustration and duress and was probably, I can admit now, hyperbole but I would think that was obvious. The point stands, though, that it was meant to convey just how much pain was felt.

The thing is that, yes, there is some selfishness tied to addiction in so much as the person is so desperate to focus on his or her feelings to the exclusion of realizing how their actions are affecting others but that, in and of itself is part of addiction being a disease. What should be so easy, what should be the obvious choice to make is not.

I would suggest that, for anyone who is interested, you pick up a copy of Uppers, Downers All Arounders: Physical and Mental Effects of Psychoactive Drugs by Inaba and Cohen. Might not change your opinion on the topic but at least it can give you an idea on other reasons, not just foolishness, that makes up the addictive person.

Having said that, I'm off to light a candle in memoriam and to listen to my copies of Frank and Back to Black.

Posted by: smijca at July 26, 2011 8:28 PM

I can understand that it might be hyperbole, but do you think your father thought that about you saying it? Do you think he meant it in that fashion? I understand it was said to open his eyes, but your own statement says his response opened yours to his pain, not really vice-versa. I'm trying hard to not say anything harsh at this point as some people seem to take argument and discussion a little too personally, but in my OPINION, your father should have been horrified and asked YOU if you needed help. He should have broke down crying that he caused you that much pain, not turned it back around to his own pain. That's the selfishness and weakness that people are talking about. You had just finished telling him about all the pain he's causing you and his response was "Yeah, so? I'm in pain too." Maybe that was the only response he could muster, maybe he's a hardass and can't show love in that way, I don't know and I'm not trying to shit on him for it. I just have a hard time believing that addiction did that.

And again, if suggesting people should seek help when they're in pain is wrong, then screw all you. You're too interested in winning your own arguments based on your pwecious feewings than arguing a real point.

Posted by: Protoguy at July 26, 2011 9:03 PM

My mentioning my cancer is only to illustrate that yes, my life sucks hard too, not as some badge that I'm courageous. There was a lot more in my post than my cancer. Which was why I took the time to write all of it. My point was that my life sucks a lot harder than most of you and certainly more than some diva who had the world handed to her, but who couldn't put the shit away. If that makes me arrogant or superior, then yes, I guess I am in that regard.

Posted by: Protoguy at July 26, 2011 9:09 PM

Good article. I, too, grow very tired of how this sort of thing crops up every single time someone famous passes away. Don't belittle those who mourn, and don't be so quick to judge those who've died. There are more worthwhile debates we could be expending our energy on than whether it's "okay" to mourn Amy Winehouse. Of course it is.

Posted by: TheKnightWhoSaidNi at July 26, 2011 9:14 PM

my grand parents were alcoholics, my parents were alcoholics, I was an alcoholic. I drank and I loved it. I drank all of the time, at work, at school, after work, after school, daytime, nighttime, weekends, and week nights, I always had a drink and a reason to drink. I never hit rock bottom, kept a job, went to college and graduated. I never listened to those around me who said you need help. One day I woke up and went THIS IS STUPID. That was 27 years ago, not one drink, no twelve step, no church, no AA, no sponsor, no fucking drinking. I didn't do it for my wife, kids, or any one else, I didn't do it for anyone but me. I chose to not drink. So don't babble this bullshit about for some it will never get better. You choose to drink you choose to do drugs, you choose to fuck up. Winehouse chose to do drugs and drink, she could have chosen not to. She is the one responsible for her choices. End of rant.

Posted by: So what at July 26, 2011 9:41 PM

mothy, you should take some of your own advice. you claim this site has suffered because of female writers yet even you have admittied you are guessing the writers "gender" (and the fact you dont know the difference between sex and gender makes your remarks even more stupid) yet you lecture others about not judging?

Posted by: your momma at July 26, 2011 10:30 PM

Protoguy, I had no idea that you had cancer but it kind of puts your commentary into perspective and I get why you're saying what you're saying and feeling what you're feeling regarding addiction and all.

The I want to slice my vein open was said when I was 19 and I was a teenager who was being dramatic. I wasn't literally feeling like I wanted to engage in cutting behavior or anything but I remember being desperate to explain to him how much pain seeing him being killed by his addiction was causing me and that was just the words that came to mind at the time. His response wasn't so much as "so?" as much as a his wanting me to understand that no matter how much I blamed him for how I was feeling, called him a bad father or a shitty human being (all emotions I had at the time) I could not even begin to understand how much pain he felt at being himself. Self-centered a bit, yeah, but I realized that, at the time at least, he was too deep in the hole to be able to help himself much less do what I thought at the time should have been pretty easy if he'd wanted.

He's been sober four years now and I've long since made peace with our past and any issues that might have arisen and am happy to say I'm in a good place in my life and grateful he's still alive. But Amy's situation and countless other people who are in the grips of addictions' stories always remind me it could have gone the other way for him.

My apologies to everyone else for over sharing because, in the end, this really isn't the place what with the scathing and bitchy but good night to all and carry on.

Posted by: smijca at July 26, 2011 10:47 PM

Here's what it boils down to for me: It either affects you or it doesn't. And (here's the important part) you have NO right to tell anyone how to be affected by something. If a person is sad that someone died, why do you have to be the asshole and mock them for it? What purpose does it serve? Do you think the other person will just erase those feelings and go over to your side? Is that your life? Feel angry if you must, but damn, why lash out at people who you know are feeling bad? Damn, that just makes you an asshole.

Posted by: Figgy at July 26, 2011 10:53 PM

Yes, So What, because every single alcoholic out there will have the same experiences you did. Every single person out there will (nay, should!) react the same way you did. Everyone knows people react to drugs and alcohol in the same manner.

I mean damn, it's great that you got over it, but not even realizing that it might be different for other people just strikes me as terribly obtuse.

Posted by: Figgy at July 26, 2011 10:59 PM

Protoguy and So what, well said. If it's a disease, as so many here want to believe, then why do we criminalize it, incarcerate people for it, punish them for being so afflicted?

I see addicts all the live-long-day at work, and it always strikes me as passing curious that they can cure their "disease" by attending meetings or, as So what did, by a simple act of will.

The only truly ugliness I've seen here lately is the contemptible abuse directed at a cancer survivor for daring to point out that Winehouse simply got what she seemed to want more than life itself.

Posted by: Mike at July 26, 2011 11:58 PM

As many before me have said, and I hope as many who follow me will also say, thank you Courtney for a well thought out, evenly measured, beautiful piece of writing.

And now I would like to make a slightly askew comment which everyone can choose to ignore at will but has been hanging heavily on my heart and mind for days:

In the midst of the battle of who has the greater right to mourn or judge we are missing a far larger point, in my humble and very sleepy opinion. That death (of anyone, in any circumstance) affects each of us differently. Some of us feel the need to rage against what we see; others feel the need to sink into a depth of mourning…

And some of us are hit with the pain of personal loss and tragedy that in many ways is completely unrelated to the details of what has occurred, but in that moment we are brought back to the pain of our personal trauma. For me, and maybe only for me, the loss of Amy Winehouse brought up unresolved issues of my father’s death with one rather innocuous word.

The word that did it to me was inconclusive. Initially all lab reports on my father’s passing had come back as inconclusive and it took 5 long, painful months for answers which never actually arrived. (He was a recovered alcoholic and former smoker, and his accidental death was determined to be a drowning although according to the M.E.’s report there was not sufficient evidence for either, they were just out of ideas.)

So as we continue to debate, both politely and heatedly as the internet is wont to make us do, I hope that everyone will take a moment to look at themselves and see what is going on inside which makes you react in the way you have. Some of us seem to know very well, and some seem to be floundering.

And with that I will slide back into anonymity…

Posted by: faintingviolet at July 26, 2011 11:58 PM

smijca, thank you for responding calmly and with thought. I apologize if I might not have at times. I do try, but I admit to being rather grumpy. I'm glad your father found his way.

I also freely admit that I have small patience for some things, such as cutting and suicide threats and even anorexia. I know it's likely to bring out the sharp knives, you know, the people who scream I should have tolerance but don't seem to be able to tolerate someone else's thoughts or opinions?

Posted by: Protoguy at July 27, 2011 12:03 AM

So, no one has linked to
this
yet?

*ducks for cover*

Posted by: general rhubarb at July 27, 2011 1:01 AM

I don't think it's that black and white.. I spent years, and I'm sure I'm not the only one, waiting for RDJ to be found dead alone in a motel room.. Or Trent Reznor.. They both pulled through.

I do agree about looking inward and all that.. these people are for better or worse our mirrors sometimes..

Posted by: Sarah J-Town at July 27, 2011 3:43 AM

or, to the other extreme, that addiction has touched their lives and they have been stripped of sympathy for those who can’t overcome.

Yeah...this is me. I've found it very hard over the last few days to find any sympathy for Amy Winehouse, but have kept my mouth shut or agreed that it is sad to anyone who mentioned it. Because it is, of course it is. But I find it sadder for those around her who loved her and have had to watch her basically kill herself for years and haven't been able to help. They will probably blame themselves for not doing more (even if there is nothing more that they could do) and will carry it around with them for the rest of their lives. They're the ones I feel sorry for.

But that's my baggage.

Posted by: Carrie at July 27, 2011 5:11 AM

I think what strikes me most about all this is how eagerly and gleefully many of us check out the newest scandals in celebrity lives (Winehouse drunk in dirty ballet slippers! Lohan broke, stumbles and rants!)and then expend the same amount of energy berating or bemoaning those very celebrities' tragic fates.
We have a word for that over here - Schadenfreude.
So I agree with many of the more eloquent posts above - let's spend less time googling celebrity mishaps and deaths and look to solving our own issues as well as those of our community.

Posted by: cinekat at July 27, 2011 6:11 AM

There was an interesting article about the media reactions to Winehouse's death in The Guardian:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2011/jul/26/amy-winehouse-death-badly-reported, commenting on the "inevitability" of Winehouse's death and the guesses-as-fact about the circumstances surrounding it in the British media.

Posted by: Lily at July 27, 2011 7:37 AM

Courtney, this piece really was perfectly written and really does express all the frustration I've been feeling about the way people have reacted to Amy's death.

There is one thing I want to add personally though. The thing that makes me so sad about Amy's death is not just that she was talented (which she was) or that she was an addict, its that she seemed like an absolutely lovely person. When I first started listening to her music I scoured youtube and watched tons of her videos and interviews. She was a funny, thoughtful, sweet person who was often consumed by the love she had for her boyfriend and then husband. This is the real theme of "Rehab" (I'm going to lose my baby, so I always keep a bottle near) and this was something I always identified with.

Watch some of her interviews if you can find them or even re-watch her Grammy performance, where you can see her mugging for her husband in prison, going so far as repeatedly including his name and prison number in her songs. Then watch her win her grammy and rush to hug her mother before even realizing she hasn't made her speech yet. There has always been something deeply touching about Amy Winehouse and the way she always had her whole life laid bare for the world to see.

So I'm going to mourn her not just because she was talented or tragic, but because she seemed like a wonderful person who couldn't see how wonderful she was.

Posted by: valerie at July 27, 2011 12:28 PM

For fuck's sake, So what, so YOU had THAT experience -- good for you.

Some of us were not quite as lucky. Some of us actually had to hit a goddamned rock fucking bottom and get some fucking help. I'm sorry you feel that makes us fucking LOSERS or something, but in my estimation, that makes us LUCKY as fucking hell. The grotesquely pitiful and incomprehensible demoralisation I endured before I got sober almost 15 years ago may not have been INEVITABLE, but it was what it fucking WAS, and there it is.

And frankly, I resent the hell out of being told in not so many words that I'm some sort of asshole for having to seek help and continue to do so in order to stay sober. Because, let me tell you buddy, the alternative ain't pretty. I've tried it before. It doesn't work for me. I've tried it REPEATEDLY. Amy Winehouse? That could be me. And if I don't keep doing what I'm doing, that WILL be me. In a HEARTBEAT. Or, should I say, a LACK of a heartbeat. Been there, done that, got the goddamned tire tracks on my back to prove it.

And while I'm here ranting like a motherfucking LUNATIC, may I just say, mothy or whatever your name is... what the hell? You've been "feeling disillusioned with this site's recent penchant for bringing in female writers" and feel that the WRITING HAS SUFFERED AS A RESULT?

What the fuck kind of misogynist bullshit is THAT? I mean, seriously, do you bother to THINK before you type??? Do you honestly believe that female writing is, on the whole, worse than male writing? Seeing as the vast majority of published writing in the course of human history has been that of males' -- and, ergo, the vast majority of BAD writing has been that of males' -- I simply do not know how you can possibly come to that conclusion. Simple mathematical probability would lead anyone with a functioning brain to understand that males and females write in an equal ratio of bad to good: Mostly bad, very few good.

Very questionable post, that one.

As to the Amy Winehouse issue... Well. Since I am a recovering alcoholic, it should be obvious where I come down on this issue. As for the hordes of people who never knew the woman and yet are now mourning her on TWITTER and FACEBOOK as if she were their best friend... Sigh. I take issue with it on a couple fronts.

First... I don't think those are proper venues for MOURNING. Also, I think a lot of those people were the same people MOCKING her while she was alive. But if they didn't, okay, whatever. Whatever. I am not a big mourner, except for people I knew extremely well. I'm emotionally tight as a drum. When I finally break, I break big... but it takes real pain. I don't break for celebrity death.

She was an addict, and it got her. It gets most addicts. I am lucky. After many years of struggle -- harsh, painful struggle, humiliating struggle -- I got sober. It's been many years, and I think about drinking almost every day. I am not one of those serene alcoholics who got struck sober and walked away from it never to be tempted again. It is a daily struggle. So judge Amy Winehouse? No. Not for a second. I envy her death, actually. Some days I pray for it.

Posted by: Maryscott O'Connor at July 27, 2011 5:18 PM

Drink, do drugs, or don't everything else is bullshit. It's your choice and no one else can make that choice for you. If you fail to recognize the choice that doesn't mean you didn't make a choice, if it makes you a loser that's your choice as well.

Posted by: So what at July 27, 2011 7:17 PM

Maryscott FTW.

Posted by: Ender at August 1, 2011 10:33 AM

Money talks, BS walks.

Posted by: Greg at September 14, 2011 10:10 AM