web
counter
 

Lindsay Lohan's Glamorous Hollywood Life (of Being Used Solely to Generate Publicity for Sh*tty Direct-to-Video Fare)

By Courtney Enlow | Posted Under Celebrities Are Better than You | Comments (25)



Lindsay-Lohan-To-Play-Victoria-Gotti.jpg

There’s going to be a movie about the Gotti family starring John Travolta and Joe Pesci.

I preface with this because all anyone knows about that movie is the stuff to which I’m about to devote the rest of this article, so I thought I’d start on a high note, and by high note, I mean “description of a box you will see in the ‘Nearly New’ section of your local Family Video despite never recalling the film being released in the first place.”

Last week, a press conference was held to announce the production of Gotti: Three Generations. Lindsay Lohan was there, despite not actually being signed on to appear in the film.

So let’s back up from that back-up. Mere days before this press conference, the one Lindsay Lohan wasn’t actually part of because she hadn’t actually been confirmed for the movie, “sources” told all manner of low-tier news outlet that Lindsay had been “handpicked” by Victoria Gotti to portray her, going so far as to say Lohan had beaten Sienna Miller and Blake Lively for the role.

The above makes far more sense when you learn that one week after the aforementioned “source” leak, Victoria Gotti herself came forth and said it wasn’t true, that she’d never said anything of the sort.

So, here’s the thing: I hope this master class in understanding celebrity fuckery that I’ve been teaching here for almost a year has taught us all to see but one important fact—when it comes to “sources,” they’re always the celebrity in question. The source saying Victoria Gotti had handpicked Lindsay Lohan, over one actually in-demand actress and one Sienna Miller, who made the story “newsworthy” enough that people didn’t find it all that Sean Young-y for Lindsay to appear at the press conference of a movie she hadn’t actually signed on to, it was totally Lindsay. Or her mother. Probably her mother.

So, no one will be shocked when news came yesterday that Lohan had, in fact, lost the part, due to outrageous demands and negotiations.

What is surprising is this: the producer candidly talked about this, implying Lohan is a child, then cast her in a much smaller role later that same day.

It’s almost like this producer, who’s only made one movie prior, used Lindsay Lohan to generate publicity for a movie in which she was never supposed to play a huge role, publicly humiliated her for acting like the diva we all assume she probably is, then gave her a small role like it was a huge gift, adding insult to insult and solidifying the direct-to-videoness of this whole affair by informing us how Lindsay’s newly acquired role, Gotti daughter-in-law Kim, was originally to be played by Kim Kardashian.

And that, my friends, is the present career of an actress who only five years ago was considered A-list.

This Lohan-go-round shitshow is nothing new. This time last year, news spread that Lohan had been cast in the biopic of Linda Lovelace, star of Deep Throat. The Dov Charney of the photographic world, Tyler Shields, promoted Matthew Wilder’s as-yet unproduced film by taking vaguely menacing pictures of Lohan as Lovelace.

After seven months of nonstop talk about this new role and leaked (and completely fucked up and poorly written) script pages, finally, director Matthew Wilder put Lohan out of her misery and announced she’d been dropped from the flick due to “the impossibility of insuring her — and some other issues.”

That is the life of Lindsay Lohan. Directors, who will usually lie through their teeth with the sugar-coated words of an ugly Hollywood divorce to save the face of a dropped star, will just call her out for being outrageous and issue-laden. If I have to explain to you how unheard of this is, it is really fucking unheard of. That is why you always hear “Blake Lively was a consummate professional and a joy to work with, but we’ve gone another direction,” and never “Blake Lively was a diva cunt of the highest regard and we shitcanned her.” (Please note: Blake Lively was just the first person who came to mind. I have no knowledge of her cuntness, real or imagined.)

Deserved or not, of her own making or not, Lindsay Lohan’s career is really fucking sad right now, And I suppose, at that point, you take what you can get—even if what you can get is professional scapegoat for go-nowhere B-movies.









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



Bad News, Nannies, Brad and Angie Don't Care If You Can Sew Lederhosen Out Of Curtains | Peter Jackson's First Set Video And The Ten Most Hobbity-Faced Actors To Have Never Played Hobbit









Comments

I'm a parent. I am a child of gnarly-strict parents. Being a good (read: effective, proof-in-the-pudding-none-of-my-kids-end-up-in-jail,-unwed-pregnant-and-I-cried-at-their-UCSantaClara-graduation) parent weighs heavily on me every minute of my day. I'm scared shitless half the time.

This...this above-Lohan-fuckery-stuff...? This stuff is one of the reasons I am constantly scared. Not because I am anything like Dina Lohan, but because all the other parents out there are not as scared as I am and their little miscreants are out there messing up their lives and all we had to do to prevent this was be good parents who gave love and consequences.

Sorry. I had no sleep lat night. My son is in 6th grade. I hope I don't need to explain myself any further...6th grade. 6th grade is the 4th circle of hell on parents.

Posted by: klingonfree at April 21, 2011 2:10 PM

First of all I seriously hope they aren't tapping Travolta/Pesci to play Gotti and Sammy the Bull, Travolta is too effeminate and Pesci is just too fucking old. Second, Lohan is as sure fire a way to guarantee box-office failure as hiring Cuba Gooding, or Zoooooey Deschanel. And finally, a cursory IMDB search of the "producers" just reveals that the guys are sketchy as hell.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at April 21, 2011 2:17 PM

Lohan was considered A-list?

Posted by: Kargoyle at April 21, 2011 2:25 PM

The real question is...

Who gives a fuck about the Gotti's?

Posted by: DeistBrawler at April 21, 2011 2:27 PM

It's even sadder when one is obviously taking hair styling ("styling" used generously here) cues from My Pretty Pony Gotti.

Posted by: klingonfree at April 21, 2011 2:27 PM

Klingonfree: Wait.

Posted by: TylerDFC at April 21, 2011 2:29 PM

I'd feel sorry for her if it wasn't her own fault for her downfall. And I know that it's tough to gauge just how much of her issues/life are the result of shitty parenting at the hands of two people I wouldn't trust a ferret with -- never mind children -- but ultimately, the blame will always fall at her feet.

That said, she is a name and that is what these "producers" are flogging. Fact is that if this Gotti movie is ever made (and I'm not sure I care to know why it should), she wasn't going to get a part in it. But they can use her name to pimp out the idea of their movie to every celebrity site, blog and paper out there.

If anyone gave a crap for her, they'd have her away from the circus. But since no one does, it's no surprise.

Posted by: Fredo at April 21, 2011 2:32 PM

Lohan was considered A-list?

For a hot minute back in 2004. She had hit movies (Mean Girls, Freaky Friday) and hit songs.

Of course, there's a train of thought that our Celebrity Scientist may discuss at a future event regarding the height of success for young girls like Lohan and Britney Spears and why does it come when they're just on the wrong side of "Legality".

Posted by: Fredo at April 21, 2011 2:39 PM

This just makes me want to go watch Mean Girls again and relive the good ole days when Lindsay was a healthy weighted red head who hid her Crazy.

Posted by: Even Stevens at April 21, 2011 2:39 PM

So how far we from "Mean Girls the porno movie" starring Lindsay Lohan!

Posted by: John W at April 21, 2011 2:50 PM

Lindsey looks like she is about 50 years old.
Mother Dina looks like she's about to crumble to dust.

Drugs and hair dye are hard on a person, y'all...

Posted by: lil_a at April 21, 2011 2:51 PM

Lohan was never A-List, neither was she talented, she has notoriety which is something altogether different. See: Wynona Ryder, a real actress, paid her dues was actually A-list and her notoriety made her unemployable for a while (girlfriend seems to be on the comeback trail).
Lindsay McCrackwhore on the other hand got a swelled head after the mild success of a Tina Fey/Rachel McAdams vehicle and went on a career killing crack rampage. Lindsay has NEVER, EVER, carried a film, after her promising start on Parent Trap she never evolved, she never develop any sort of craft, she played the same social climbing teen in three consecutive films(they flopped), then she played a variation on it in that film with Jane Fonda, that other stupid stripper shit did was understood by no one. In other words there's nothing to see there acting wise folks.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at April 21, 2011 2:56 PM

"So how far we from "Mean Girls the porno movie" starring Lindsay Lohan!"
- Posted by: John W

I believe that's already in development. My sources tell me the current working title is Peen Girls.

Posted by: Groundloop at April 21, 2011 3:18 PM

I am fond of "quipping" (is that a word?) that if a tree fell in the forest and I wasn't there to hear it, it didn't make a sound. However, the longer I live in LA-la, the more I realize that celebrity reality seems to be exactly what these people make it.

Not that I think they know what they are doing, but its impressive that anyone can say "Hey I want to be in a movie, so I will announce I'm in it and generate the publicity. Sure someone may use me in this process, but I'll get a part." and it works.

Posted by: JuiceinLA at April 21, 2011 3:26 PM

She wasn't even supposed to be in the trashy Gotti bio-pic (who'd watch this tripe anyway?) and somehow they felt bad enough to give her smaller role? I think it worked out to Lilo's advantage. She knows she's almost washed up at this point. Just stay sober and go move to Tahiti already, girl!

Posted by: Gina at April 21, 2011 3:34 PM

Groundloop, I've been told it's called That is So Felch.

Posted by: Courtney at April 21, 2011 3:49 PM

It's funny, other supposedly non-news sources reported this story/non-story a week ago.

http://www.thesuperficial.com/?s=gotti

Now they're saying that she will play the younger Kim.

Anyone who gives this hole another chance is an idiot

Posted by: Protoguy at April 21, 2011 8:20 PM

Lindsay McCrackwhore on the other hand got a swelled head after the mild success of a Tina Fey/Rachel McAdams vehicle

Anyone who gives this hole another chance is an idiot

I hope the jagoffs who make comments like this have their 19-year-old selves and actions judged by folks just as far removed and empathy-less as they are.

Posted by: Anon at April 21, 2011 8:44 PM

Sorry, but the history of this girl - now woman - is well documented. At what point are apologists like you going to ask that she act like an adult? At what point is she responsible for her own actions - just like the rest of us?

I would have far more empathy for her if she weren't the one spinning out these stories herself. I would have far more sympathy for her if every comment she issues weren't yet another example of her narcissistic personality, her disconnect from reality and her disdain for how a professional should behave.

She's the one who crashed the damn press-conference to spew out her brand of crazy. She's the one who's been fired from her last 6 or 7 projects for not showing up, or acting like a diva and basically making everyone's life miserable with her elitist entitled attitude.

Yeah, she's enabled and controlled and manipulated by her fucked up family and handlers, but her family didn't make the statements she's made, her family didn't commit "oops, I forgot" jewelry theft twice. Her family didn't move next door to her ex-girlfriend. When is she going to be held responsible for her own actions without an army of Lilo fans leaping on our backs to defend her repugnant behavior?

I'm personally tired of hearing about her, and yes, I do wish people would quit giving her second chances, much less fifteenth chances. Seems to me she would be a little more likely to face reality if we stopped letting her believe in her fantasy world where she's a good actress, a responsible professional and not at all nuts.

Posted by: Protoguy at April 21, 2011 9:58 PM

I hope the jagoffs who make comments like this have their 19-year-old selves and actions judged by folks just as far removed and empathy-less as they are.
Posted by: Anon at April 21, 2011 8:44 PM


HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA, okay lemme see: never stole expensive jewelry, or clothing, never went on a cocaine fueled car-jacking rampage, never flashed my pantyless crotch and never needed to go to court mandated rehab. Was gainfully and productively employed though.

Go ahead, judge away.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at April 21, 2011 10:29 PM

Also, she is nearly 25 years old. That is definitely old enough to be held responsible for her actions (See BSlim's list above).

Posted by: Even Stevens at April 21, 2011 10:35 PM

Wow, Lindsey and Dina look like twins in the header pic...

The only way LL will ever make enough money in Hollywood to pay her rent is to sign up for the Charlie Sheen Destruction Tour.

Posted by: Kirbyjay at April 22, 2011 9:32 AM

While we're either lamenting or enjoying LiLo's descent into the pit, why do I think that somehow, some way she managed to make $2 or $3 or $5 million in the past year by doing nothing?

Posted by: , at April 22, 2011 11:30 AM

Because, like Paris, we're fueling her "pay me to show up at your party" business by constantly showing interest in her celebrity-for-nothing ass

Posted by: Protoguy at April 22, 2011 1:02 PM

That's what I thought.

Posted by: , at April 22, 2011 1:48 PM