web
counter
 

Lindsay Lohan in Talks to Play Elizabeth Taylor, and I Tase Myself in a Desperate Effort to Feel Feelings

By Courtney Enlow | Posted Under Celebrities Are Better than You | Comments (22)



Lindsay-Lohan1.jpg

I don’t want to sound like I’m okay with this. I’m not. Not even a little bit. But, at this point, it’s like the parents on any given episode of “Intervention.” “Fine, fuck it, have a Norco. Yes, here’s a twenty, too. I am tired and numb to you and your noise.” So I’m going to phone this one in, because I’ve lost the ability to get worked up over Lindsay Lohan and the dipshit decisions of Hollywood. I’ll need to rest my brain as I do so, because it may get a cramp.

There is going to be a movie. But not really because it will be on Lifetime. This movie will be about Elizabeth Taylor and Richard Burton. It will be called “Elizabeth & Richard: A Love Story.” It does not appear to have anything to do with the book Furious Love because Lifetime execs don’t need to read things like books or scripts or anything that indicates how people feel about actors, hence Jennifer Love Hewitt being a real high-level pull for the network.

I have to take a break now because I started to have an emotion and it was exhausting. Deadline will continue with one of their EXCLUSIVES they are super stoked to have.

Lohan, a hot child actress who successfully transitioned into young adult roles with Freaky Friday and Mean Girls, has been largely sidelined from her acting career for the past couple of years by stints in rehab, jail, court rooms and recently, a morgue as part of her community service. Lohan’s most recent credits include the features Machete and Labor Pains and an arc on ABC’s Ugly Betty. Lohan has been compared to Taylor. In addition to their physical resemblance, a 2004 Slate story lists a host of other similarities: “Both had domineering stage mothers, little semblance of a real childhood, fame from a young age, substance abuse issues, public emotional outpourings, and copious amounts of tabloid drama. The key difference, though, is that Elizabeth Taylor had a true record of achievement before she became the most notorious movie star in America.”

By the by, I would just like to take this opportunity to say that the people who work at Deadline and type words into their computer machines cannot actually write for shit. That read like a fourth grader’s book report on Amy Fisher. Also, no. No one compares them, and no there is no physical resemblance. No.

Ooh! It’s happening, you guys! A sensation!

This is just what Lindsay Lohan needs. She’s already been allowed to pretend to be Marilyn Monroe on multiple occasions. Now she’s going to get money to pretend she’s worthy of even sharing the same plane of existence as Liz Taylor, let alone portray her? Can you imagine the bullshit she’ll spout on Twitter about how honored she is to play this icon, while somehow thinking she deserves it as a worthy heir? Those similarities mentioned by Slate and Deadline above? Those barely count as shared traits, particularly when they are shared by 90% of Hollywood. That’s just everyone. And that key difference, that Taylor actually did something before she had her scandals, that’s a big fucking difference. Also, Taylor had just that: scandals. She did not descend into just this side of porn, falling spectacularly to the bottom of the fucking Lifetime barrel. She devoted her life to charity and giving. Lindsay Lohan took a camera crew to India and tweeted about child prostitution for five minutes before she was flown back first class.

So, no, I’m not jazzed about this. Liz is up there already pissed that her last interview was conducted by Kim fucking Kardashian. She doesn’t need this, too. Or, quite possibly, she’s laughing about it. She seemed to have that kind of sense of the ridiculous. Either way, this is stupid.

In a completely unrelated story, I will be liveblogging the shit out of this movie upon its premiere.









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



Emma Stone Does Her Best Baby Goose Impression. Fails Adorably. | The First 5 People I'd Consider If I Were Casting Satan in a Film in Which the Devil Lives Among Us









Comments

Trust me, it ain't happening. Lohan will take whatever money they give her upfront and party it up in one weekend, which will end with her arrested and will mean she'll have to be dropped from this project -- but since they gave her money, they won't have enough to keep going. So it'll all collapse.

And Lindsay Lohan will continue in her role as Movie-Shiva, Destroyer of Shitty Projects.

Posted by: Fredo at January 10, 2012 2:10 PM

So who is going to play Richard Burton?

Posted by: MRod at January 10, 2012 2:16 PM

So who is going to play Richard Burton?

Taylor Lautner, of course!

Posted by: mswas at January 10, 2012 2:19 PM

MRod, in the same vein of casting based on tabloids and general fail, I nominate Corey Feldman.

Posted by: thatsjesstastic at January 10, 2012 2:22 PM

See, I could buy a lot of actresses playing Liz Taylor, but I can't think of a single man alive who could accurately portray the awesomeness that was Richard Burton. Certainly not anyone who is Lifetime-caliber.

Posted by: Mel C. at January 10, 2012 2:22 PM

@mswas, Lifetime would never pony up the Llamautner dollars required. Besides, I think we need somebody more in line with Linds as far as "Distance Fallen From Grace", so it's a toss up between Dustin Diamond and David Faustino, with Charlie Sheen as a dark, demented horse.

Posted by: Groundloop at January 10, 2012 2:26 PM

Lindsay Lohan and Elizabeth Taylor have physical resemblances such as: they both have two eyes. They both have two arms. Etc.

This is just stupid. Ugh. I agree: emotion overload leads to emotion fail.

Posted by: MM at January 10, 2012 2:30 PM

"So who is going to play Richard Burton?"

Michael Lohan. Because that's the only way this story could get any grosser.

Posted by: Craig at January 10, 2012 2:36 PM

OH! okay, this is a "Lifetime" television movie.
Wow... that makes it all the more pathetic. Good lord, that is almost sad actually.

Does anyone with actual brain function watch Lifetime? Aren't they all hooked up to an iron lung or something, and unable to change the channel? Dude, that is just cruel.

The title should be "Elizabeth & Richard: We Shit On Your Graves"

Posted by: MRod at January 10, 2012 2:37 PM

This is about as believable as the story after Johnny Cash's death saying Preparation H had bought the rights to use "Ring of Fire" in their commercials.

Posted by: Mrs. Julien at January 10, 2012 2:37 PM

Lindsay who?

Posted by: admin at January 10, 2012 2:40 PM

Mrs. Julien...I kneel at your feet.

Posted by: =^.^= at January 10, 2012 2:54 PM

Ugh...thank you for reminding me about those horrid excuses for a "Playboy" photo shoot.

Posted by: PG13 at January 10, 2012 3:30 PM

Hmmm, a role that requires her "pretend" to get shitty drunk by noon and have heated, blowout fights with her lover.

Is Samantha Ronson available to play Richard Burton?

Posted by: TheEmpress at January 10, 2012 3:58 PM

Agreed that there is no one who could play Richard Burton out there, and if there is then Lifetime certainly won't find him. Also, in terms of casting Elizabeth I still say Alison Brie or GTFO. But then again, this whole project is an abortion so I hope that a fire will magically burn down Lifetime headquarters.

I'm very attached to the Taylor-Burtons.

Posted by: Erin S at January 10, 2012 4:21 PM

File this under "There I've said it." I've honestly never been that impressed with Elizabeth Taylor. Her constant scenery chewing grates, and only actually worked well in "Who's Afraid of Virginia Woolf?" For me she fits into the same category as Natalie Wood and James Dean as actors that portrayed EMOTION!!!! as opposed to "emotion."

As far as I'm concerned, having Lindsay portray her on a pathetic little Lifetime movie is just about right. Punchline fits the joke.

I am a bit curious about Lindsay having an "overbearing mother" though. Desperate and irresponsible maybe. Overmedicating certainly. Just not "overbearing."

Posted by: Harborwolf at January 10, 2012 5:18 PM

"overbearing"
---
It certainly fits. She overbore one more daughter than she should have. The first one.

Posted by: , at January 10, 2012 6:40 PM

How fast do you think Elizabeth Taylor is spinning at the moment?

Posted by: jimgooseridesagain at January 11, 2012 12:39 AM

Damn you, Mrs. Julien. Now I actually want this to happen just so I can read your live blog. Though I would completely feel your pain as I read it... with tears of laughter streaming down my face.

Posted by: cinekat at January 11, 2012 3:49 AM

Harborwolf -- I feel you. Totally. I never "got" it...except Who's Afraid...?, which was GREAT. In addition to the qualities you name, I add her hyper-adenoidal voice.

Posted by: klingonfree at January 11, 2012 8:39 AM

OK, I'd be upset about this (alright, I AM upset about this) if it weren't for another crappy bio-pic from lifetime that we all successfully erased from our memories. Does anybody remember that time Jennifer Love Hewitt was allowed to pretend to be Audrey Hepurn? No? Good! Let's keep up the good work.

Posted by: valerie at January 11, 2012 1:20 PM

I like to agree with you Courtney and think that Liz Taylor is looking down at this. in classic regal cleopatra era Taylor, not late eighties crazy hair Taylor smoking cigarettes out of those long stick things and thinking. "Who gives a fuck about this little shit?" and then laughing and laughing...

Posted by: Jessica at January 11, 2012 2:45 PM