web
counter
 

Just Throw Some Gay At It

By Courtney Enlow | Posted Under Celebrities Are Better than You | Comments (27)



nph11.jpg

Last week, GLAAD released the results of its annual survey of gay-friendly programming. CBS, TBS, USA and A&E all failed.

CBS has responded proactively and will be adding at least three gay characters to their shows. That’s aces and all, but two of the shows featuring these shiny new gays will be Rules of Engagement and $#!* Mt Dad Says. Granted, I have obviously not yet seen Dollar Sign-Number-Exclamation Point-Asterisk My Dad Says, but my understanding is that it involves an Archie Bunker-esque father who will be the primary source of comedy, so a recurring gay character will most likely serve as father fodder, even though in theory audiences are supposed to be laughing at the father’s hatefulness, not with.

What I have seen is Rules of Engagement. If you haven’t seen it, it is exactly one-third of a decent sitcom. The other two thirds are laugh cancer. So token lesbian’s only hope is that she will be a part of the good third, the one featuring Patrick Warburton and Megyn Price, as they hire a lesbian surrogate. But most likely, her presence will serve as a series of cartoon ahh-OOOGAH eyes for David Spade’s insanely obnoxious character. Much like I assume SMDS will have it, audiences are *supposed to* be laughing at David Spade’s obnoxiousness, not with.

I don’t have a lot of trust in the “laughing withs” so if the “laughing ats” are the majority, and ROE’s place as a lead-in to Two and a Half Men tells me it is, is that really in keeping with the spirit GLAAD intended this? Is it better to have gay characters solely for the purpose of William Shatner to be hilariously homophobic and David Spade to make hot lesbian jokes than to have none at all?

And not that I’m giving CBS any extra credit for having an incredibly minority-free network here, but doesn’t NPH bump them up at least a letter grade? Utilizing the most beloved gay figure on the planet as one of their biggest draws seems like it would mean something.

(source: TV Guide)

Follow Courtney Enlow on Twitter, and read her other stuff at HoboTrashcan.com.









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



Operation Endgame Review | Like Office Space With More Murderous Rage | The Sweetest Thing Review | Your Penis is So Handsome









Comments

I love your take on ROE. I watch it cause it's after How I met Your Mother. And I fucking love Patrick Warburton and he is why I watch it. That third of the show is great. The rest is blah.

Posted by: Nimue at July 29, 2010 1:57 PM

Yeah, but NPH's CHARACTER is not gay. You could replace him with Nathan Lane as the guy bragging about banging chicks and being forced to read from scripts that try too hard to invent cool new catchphrases on a show that will never ever get around to answering the question presented by its actual title, and even his explosive real-life gayness wouldn't count toward the gay-friendly head count.

Posted by: Kballs at July 29, 2010 2:04 PM

Doesn't letting an openly gay man play a notorious womanizer count as progress by some bizarre network television logic? I think it kind of does.

Posted by: Mrs. Julien at July 29, 2010 2:07 PM

And because someone should say it:

NPH can throw some gay at me anytime.

Posted by: Mrs. Julien at July 29, 2010 2:07 PM

If NPH is throwing, I'm catching. I'd like to catch as much gay as I possibly can.

Posted by: stopthemadness at July 29, 2010 2:09 PM

Looking for bi'g and t'a'll sing'les, please check: ---BigTalls ,, C'o "M ---- ,More fun waiting for you... Meet me - shirleylv23

Posted by: miller at July 29, 2010 2:11 PM

Courtney, as you know, I love, love, love the gays, I think they're *snap* faaaaaaaabulous! But I hate that they have to throw in a gay character just to appease a demographic. I'd say the same thing about racial minorities and women, too. If it works for the story, fine. If not, leave it the hell alone. Also, I hope they gays they throw at these shows aren't crazy drag queeney stereotypes unless, of course, it works for the show(s) in a non-derogatory, non-homophobic "laughing-at-the-gays-because-gay-people-still-make-a-lot-of-straight-people-uncomfortable" kind of way.

Posted by: megan at July 29, 2010 2:15 PM

"What do we want?"
"Gay sex!"
"When do we want it?"
"Now!"

Posted by: John W at July 29, 2010 2:16 PM

Christ, I hate this shit. it's not gay friendly enough so let's add some gays for, well, why the fuck not. you know what, there's not enough giant mechanical spiders on NBC. So going forward every show is required to have 44 seconds per episdode devoted to either 1) showing a giant mechanical spider and/or 2) talking about a giant mechanical spider. And all of these references must be positive.

Fuck off PC police.

Posted by: TylerDFC at July 29, 2010 2:30 PM

I'm by no means trying to give these networks a pass, but I don't think this kind of aggressive tokenism is the answer either.

Also, point of order: White Collar (USA) features a lesbian. Her sexuality is treated as a matter of course, no one makes jokes about her, and she's a member of the main cast. Just saying.

Posted by: SavageCats at July 29, 2010 2:30 PM

Hehe. Giant mechanical spiders.

Posted by: Vince Noir at July 29, 2010 3:17 PM

"even his explosive real-life gayness"
Quite the mental image that produces. ;)

Posted by: Nick at July 29, 2010 3:25 PM

If it's a gay giant mechanical spider, then CBS would get a better grade.

Posted by: mswas at July 29, 2010 3:35 PM

Crap! My gay giant mechanical spider is in the shop, otherwise I would totally lend it to them.

Posted by: Mrs. Julien at July 29, 2010 3:52 PM

Just have your straight giant mechanical spider audition while wearing an ascot -- no one will ever be the wiser.

Posted by: Jim Doggie at July 29, 2010 4:17 PM

The gay giant mechanical spider borrowed the straight one's ascot and got it tangled in his thorax. Hence being in the shop.

Posted by: Mrs. Julien at July 29, 2010 4:36 PM

Are you sure it's a gay spider? I mean, I know how to put on an ascot and I'm straight as a deformed paper clip.

Posted by: Jim Doggie at July 29, 2010 5:02 PM

Those networks should just say that they have a number of gay characters, and always have, it's just the the storylines haven't been there to make that clear, so no one knows they're gay.

I mean, how many gay co-workers do you have? How do you know? In my building I might have none, or 10 or 100 - I don't know and it doesn't make any difference to my life anyway.

Posted by: Pat C at July 29, 2010 6:14 PM

Now I'm as confused as my giant mechanical spiders are at about their sexual identity.

Posted by: Mrs. Julien at July 29, 2010 6:15 PM

How are they promoting $#!7 my dad says? I mean, when they say the name of the show on promos and such, how do they do it?

Posted by: zito at July 29, 2010 7:15 PM

Speaking as one of the gays, for me anyway, I'd rather that gays be absent instead of tokens.

Posted by: Drake at July 29, 2010 7:44 PM

I think we all agree that any of the shows Courtney mentioned would benefit from mechanical spiders, gay or otherwise. The people have spoken. So say we all!

Posted by: Uriah Creep at July 29, 2010 9:46 PM

Television = vastly improved by the presence of mechanical spider.

Wild Wild West = impaired by same.

Someone should probably do a study and explore this.

Posted by: Courtney at July 29, 2010 11:00 PM

Courtney:
Actually the mechanical tarantula was one of the FEW good things about Wild, Wild West!

Posted by: MadMike at July 29, 2010 11:11 PM

If Kevin Smith hadn't pussed out, the Superman movie could have been filled with superb mechanical spiderings. Hate monger!

Posted by: Courtney at July 29, 2010 11:31 PM

As a card-carrying gay myself, I don't think TV shows need more of the gay. I think we need to refine the gay we have. Quality gay over quantity gay, and day. See what I did there? I rhymed. Us gays do that.

Posted by: Koala of Theivery at July 31, 2010 11:35 AM

I certainly agree with almost all of thecomments above.

Posted by: Isidra Smallen at December 7, 2010 11:44 AM