web
counter
 

Don’t Panic: A Cursory Overview of Tabloid-Speak to Get You Through This Troubled Time

By Courtney Enlow | Posted Under Celebrities Are Better than You | Comments (17)



jada-and-will-smith_tom-cruise-and-katie-holmes.jpg

Have a seat, sweetie. Would you like a cola beverage? Perhaps a lemon-lime soft drink? Just because Will and Jada Smith are rumored to be ending their marriage doesn’t mean they don’t love you. It just means tabloids are reporting they don’t love each other anymore. And look on the bright side—this means you’ll have two houses you don’t live at and extra Christmas presents you won’t get. There, there, sport. Go play.

As you may have heard, because the internet fucking blew up about this yesterday in a deeply touching, unified effort against reporting on Kim Kardashian’s wedding, Will Smith and Jada Pinkett-Smith are getting divorced…according to InTouch Weekly, a publication with all the foresight of those Darwin Award winners who cut their heads off attempting to trim the hedges by lifting up their lawnmowers.

Yes, it is entirely possible that Will and Jada have a loveless marriage, thrust together by convenience and same-team-appreciation rumor-quelling. But were they actually in the midst of ending that union, do you really think InGoddamnTouch would be the ones to break it? You’re cute.

With that, I thought it an excellent time to go over some standard tabloid definitions and translations, so that you, too, will be well versed in the bullshit trade. Look what it’s done for me!

Who is “A Source”?
If it’s People Magazine, “a source” is always the celebrity in question, or its publicist. If it’s any other publication, it’s the person writing the story. With TMZ, it’s a crapshoot. Usually if it’s a lower-tiered star, your Lohan or perhaps a Kardashian, it’s them; if a real star, it’s creative invention.

PREGNANT?!
If the above is asked as a question, or indicated by one of the aforementioned “sources,” no. No she’s not.

Jennifer Aniston will always have a new love of her life when Brad Pitt or Angelina Jolie have a new movie coming out. Pitt and Jolie will always be photographed with their children when Aniston has a movie coming out. When nothing else of note is happening, “a source” will inevitably indicate that Aniston and Pitt are reuniting, or that Angelina Jolie is having another one of her lesbian heroin parties.

If the hair and makeup is done and they’re being photographed by the paparazzi, they called said paparazzi and set it up or have a deal with the photographers. Despite any claims to the contrary after the fact.

Is s/he being unfaithful?
Yes. It’s Hollywood.

Is s/he a GAY?!
Probably. Usually. Possibly not exclusively so. We don’t care, but your mom’s friends do, so they make a big deal of it and act like it’s a terrible mar. Also, they never out the ones that SUPER are, like your major Scientologists.

Katie filing for DIVORCE from Tom?!
No. She wasn’t programmed with that option.

Did they split because of [insert famous person of equal attractiveness here]?
No, they split because the relationship was no longer benefitting one or both of the players’ careers.

If a story comes out about what a hateful awful person a celebrity is, it’s either 1) true, or 2) spread by that celebrity’s ex or rival. Or 3) all of the above.

How she lost the baby weight!
They always say exercise, keeping up with the baby or good genes. The real answer is always cocaine.

Tabloids, unless they have solid proof, will never actually say “coke” or “meth” or any other illegal drug. Even if it’s totally true and obvious, they will get sued. They tend to veer toward the vastly less litigious “prescription pills” or “salvia.”

If UsWeekly has a story exclusive from a star, that star’s stock is falling, otherwise People would have gotten it. If the story is with InTouch or Life & Style, they are five minutes from being cast in a SyFy original movie or E! reality show.

Courtney Stodden is 43 years old. (not yet confirmed, but totally true.)

If a quote doesn’t sound like a real person said it, one didn’t. Again, depending on the publication (see the first lesson), it was his or her publicist, or no one.

There you have it. Once you have these down, it’s pretty easy to spot everything else. It’s like a fun game that will keep you from ending it all when you realize you’re rapidly nearing 30 and paying attention to these people for a living. Yeah.









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



Every Day And In Every Way, I'm Convinced It Should Have Been Called X-Men: Brokeback Mutant | 3-D Sex and Zen: Extreme Ecstasy Trailer: That 3D Porn Movie Isn't Really All that Porn-y









Comments

It’s like a fun game that will keep you from ending it all when you realize you’re rapidly nearing 30 and paying attention to these people for a living. Yeah.

Rapidly nearing 30, eh Courtney? What's your source on that?

Posted by: John G. at August 25, 2011 3:11 PM

I didn’t know this until recently, but an acquaintance of mine is the ex-fiancée of Doug Hutchison. How ex, you ask? Directly pre-Courtney ex. I always knew that her asshole of a boyfriend turned fiancé was an actor, but I just never asked specifically who he is, well, because I didn’t give a damn. When the store broke of him marrying Courtney, the ex-fiancée was harassed by phone calls from various publications listed here. What’s the point of me sharing this info with you? I know for a fact that Courtney is really young. But she’s also extremely crazy. As is he. So as far as I’m concerned, they deserve each other.

Posted by: Scully at August 25, 2011 3:24 PM

Courtney Stodden is really mature for her age. And by "mature" I mean in a "40+, pilled up/boozed up, former pageant queen/trophy-wife of a music/movie producer who hits on her 16-year-old son's friends whilst lounging pool-side in an inappropriate, gold thong bikini" kind of way. She's pretty much everything Linda Hogan could ever hope to be. But seriously, what the fuck is going on with her face?

Posted by: E the B at August 25, 2011 4:04 PM

I am inordinately interested in whether or not Will Smith is a Scientologist. I have a deep-seeded need to know.

Posted by: Mrs. Julien at August 25, 2011 4:05 PM

deep-seated?

Nevermind. I don't need to know that as much as I want to know if he's a Scientologist.

Posted by: Mrs. Julien at August 25, 2011 4:05 PM

Every time I see the word “salvia,” I think I've read “saliva.”

"If a quote doesn’t sound like a real person said it, one didn’t." I especially love the British tabloids that quote "quote" unquote (extra quotes for fun) Americans, but use British slang that you know the American doesn't even know. For example, they once had Paris Hilton saying, "Early days" about some new show or product she was trying to get moving.

Posted by: BWeaves at August 25, 2011 4:39 PM

I hate every single person in this photo, and I mean hate in the way that is reserved for serial killers and people who put pictures of themselves pouting from below on Twitter.

I really enjoy about myself that I have less tolerance for smug shit celebrities pull as I get older.

Posted by: Laurie at August 25, 2011 5:06 PM

Unless it involves Paul Provenza and Kathy Griffin, in which case it will all be televised live and no one will report on it anyway.

I mean, come on, people, they smoked out on television. Real pot. No one said peep.

Not that that's a bad thing, necessarily.

Posted by: Jerry at August 25, 2011 7:59 PM

Was that picture taken the same time the recent earthquake happened?

Posted by: John W at August 25, 2011 9:50 PM

When they say Rapidly approaching 30, they mean the person is 47.

Posted by: figgy at August 25, 2011 9:54 PM

Mrs. Julien, he and his wife opened up a private school that teaches Hubbard's Study Tech, and he has given money to the Celebrity Center as well as a bunch of their other charities/programs. So I think it's safe to assume that he is.

Posted by: Uda at August 25, 2011 10:08 PM

Was it actually not clear the "rapidly approaching 30" person was me? I'm a failure. /seppuku

Posted by: Courtney at August 25, 2011 10:16 PM

Was that picture taken the same time the recent earthquake happened?

Posted by: John W at August 25, 2011 10:33 PM

Tabloids, unless they have solid proof, will never actually say “coke” or “meth” or any other illegal drug. Even if it’s totally true and obvious, they will get sued.

So how does Celebitchy - which I never read, no, not me ma'am - get away with constantly referring to Lindsay Lohan as 'crackie' and 'cracked-out'?

Posted by: PaulB at August 26, 2011 8:45 AM

@PaulB - blogs get more leeway. Print publications or "respectable sources" (snorfle) are less likely to face libel charges.

Posted by: Courtney at August 26, 2011 9:53 AM

It was, but that's why it was funny!

Posted by: figgy at August 26, 2011 2:23 PM

You have observed very fascinating details! PS. really good website. "A home-made friend wears longer than one you buy in the market." by Austin O'Malley..

Posted by: Tyson F. Gautreaux at September 12, 2011 6:23 AM