web
counter
 

Assessing Scarlett Johansson: Lost in Boobland

By Agent Bedhead | Posted Under Career Assessments | Comments (28)



scarjolostca1.jpg

Subject: Scarlett Johansson, 27-year old American actress, model, singer, and aspiring director

Date of Assessment: December 21, 2011

Positive Buzzwords: Broadway, indie, boobies

Negative Buzzwords: Open-mouthed, monotone, wooden

The Case: Scarlett Johansson started her career at a very early age; to be more specific, she appeared at the age of nine in North. From there, she took on a few more bit roles before catching audience members’ attention in the Robert Redford-directed The Horse Whisperer. Then, Scarlett graduated to the status of indie darling with several well-received movies including The Man Who Wasn’t There, Ghost World, Lost in Translation, and GIrl with a Pearl Earring.

If only Scarlett had eternally stayed in that state, she might have managed to carve out some enduring acting cred, but I think Dustin best described ScarJo’s initial appeal in the 2007 version of the Pajiba Shit List:

How the fuck did this happen, people? Five years ago, Johansson was this beautifully dowdy actress with the very limited ability to play apathetic/bored characters in fun little indies like Ghost World and Lost in Translation, which benefited from her interminable mope. But before I knew what was happening, I can’t even go to the goddamn grocery store without having her cleavage shoved in my nose. Sexiest Woman Alive?! Please. You know what’s sexy in Hollywood? Talent. And Scarlett doesn’t have a lick of it.

This is not to mention the butt crackage seen ‘round the world on the cover of Vanity Fair in 2006. Yes, I realize that she’s had some recent cell phone nudies too. So basically, Scarlett’s talents are limited to push-up bras, being naked, and rambling in a monotone voice to convey apathy even when a given character shouldn’t be portrayed that way.

Then there were the creepy Woody Allen/Scarlett collaborations that I like to call the ScarJo Trilogy of Zaftig Boobery. Granted, Scarlett actually wasn’t terrible in Match Point even if the movie itself was an amoral mess. But her roles in Scoop and Vicky Cristina Barcelona? No thank you. She’s no Allen muse in manner of Diane Keaton or Mia Farrow. Instead, Scarlett was merely a lovely rack upon which Woody could set his drink between takes.
Other than that, Scarlett worked on a bunch of fair to middling modest flicks like The Perfect Score, A Love Song for Bobby Long, A Good Woman, and In Good Company before starring in Michael Bay’s only financially disastrous movie, The Island. She’s also favored period dramas like The Other Boleyn Girl, The Prestige, and (in very broad terms) The Black Dahlia, none of which did particularly well at the box office. And so she moved onto romantic comedies like He’s Just Not That Into You and The Nanny Diaries and tried to work her sex appeal in The Spirit, which did no career favors for anyone involved. In addition, Scarlett fancies herself a singer, but her two attempts at record albums (one full of Tom Waits covers and the other with Pete Yorn) have failed to reflect any ability in terms of album sales.

Interestingly enough, Scarlett has made one very shrewd career decision, which was to reportedly accept a very low salary to play Black Widow in Iron Man 2. This was a very smart move because it virtually guaranteed her a spot in the upcoming The Avengers and possibly Iron Man 3 (that is, if they end up making that movie). A run like that would be satisfy the lifelong dream of thousands of virtually untalented young starlets.

But alas, Scarlett still wants to be seen as a “serious” actress instead of merely a catsuit-wearing babe or a sweet, virginal (and apathetic) ingenue. After David Fincher decided she was too sexy to play Lisbeth Salander, Scarlett decided to accept the zookeeper role in We Bought a Zoo, during which she communicated her character’s conviction by spreading her legs. No, I don’t get it either.

While it would be easy to write Scarlett off at this point as an enduring talent, that’s (unfortunately) an impossible feat because of one simple fact. She received a Tony Award for “Best Performance by a Featured Actress in a Play” for her 2010 Broadway run in A View from the Bridge. So she always has the stage option available to her when the film roles inevitably dry up.

Prognosis: Even if the acting dries up, Scarlett has already banked plenty of back-up cash as an avid spokesmodel for the likes of L’Oreal, Dolce & Gabbana, Moet & Chandon, Louis Vuitton, and Walt Disney World. She also would love to move into directing and is currently co-writing Summer Crossing (based upon the Truman Capote work), but it’ll be a long shot to get that movie financed. A few years ago, she was allowed to helm a New York, I Love You segment, which was so underwhelming that it landed on the floor of the editing room. So I doubt that Scarlett Johansson, director is anything that will actually materialize. One thing is for certain, however, which is that Scarlett should never step into a music studio ever again.

Agent Bedhead lives in Tulsa, Oklahoma. She and her little black heart can be found at Celebitchy.









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



Conan O'Brien Puts The "AH!" In Hanukkah With His Human Centipede Menorah | Don't Belittle My People!: A Cinematic Hanukkah Celebration









Comments

I adore Lost in Translation (I KNOW, most people hate it, I get it) so I'd love to defend Scarlet, but it's like she's actively trying to make it hard for me to do that. She's been awful in pretty much everything since.

Posted by: beckster at December 21, 2011 2:09 PM

I liked Lost in Translation and In Good Company. She's not my favourite, but I've never understood the rancour she seems to inspire.

Posted by: Mrs. Julien at December 21, 2011 2:20 PM

I thought she was really annoying in Matchpoint. In all the scenes where she was supposed to be upset, all she did was pace while talking quickly and loudly. Eyes and face still otherwise dead.

Maybe it is the complete lack of talent, but I also just don't find her that pretty at all.

Posted by: Eva at December 21, 2011 2:28 PM

Nonsense. Kathy Bates has talent. Eliza Dushku does not. Who is sexier? Yeah, that's what I thought.

Posted by: Tracer Bullet at December 21, 2011 2:53 PM

She doesn't bother me. Probably because you don't hear much about her. She's not out partying her face off, showing her snatch in public, bad mouthing directors, or blathering on about her "craft".
Her marriage and divorce were kept almost impossibly quiet and she hasn't been arrested.
She's not a terrible actress and I haven't heard her sing so...? Don't get the hatred.

Posted by: the other courtney at December 21, 2011 3:22 PM

Yeah, I think I'm with the other courtney on this one. Yes, she was branded an "it" girl, but that's hardly her fault. If anything, her greatest sins appear to be getting casted in great parts despite only being an average-to-good actress, and showing too much cleavage. I don't think I'll cast any stones for either of those things.

Posted by: Ghisent at December 21, 2011 3:54 PM

Like some other who have commented, I just don't get the hate. Is is that your frustrated by unrealized potential or something else entirely?

I appreciate good actors/actresses as much as the next guy but "You know what’s sexy in Hollywood? Talent." is dead wrong. Sexy is sexy and Scarlett is sexy. Maybe not "sexiest alive" sexy but definitely 100% sexy.

Posted by: ComfortableMadness at December 21, 2011 3:57 PM

Sexy.

(Not meant to mock, as I totally agree with you on her attractiveness.)

Posted by: Socrates_Johnson at December 21, 2011 3:59 PM

@Tracer Bullet, that really depends how you define 'sexy'. If to you it means a tight little bum, perky boobs and a pretty face (with little behind the eyes, on screen at least) then yes, Dushku has it. However the talent, intellect and humour of Kathy Bates, the sparkle in her eye... Well, I think it's sexy. Do you reckon you'll still be crushin' on Dushku when she's 63?

Posted by: Whatsyourbeef at December 21, 2011 3:59 PM

I have no real opinion about hating or loving her one way or another. She's not for me, and her choices are usually not movies I'm interested in anyway, so mostly I've been able to ignore her (although she did date Sean Penn, and that is disgusting and worthy of scorn).

But I will say this, Ghisent: being an "it" girl doesn't just happen to you. You have to lobby for it, hard. There is a crazy amount of behind the scenes PR work and ass-kissing/metaphorical dick-sucking of magazine editors and taste-makers and studio execs that happens in order for a young actress to land on the cover of GQ and Vanity Fair. After cultivating a pretty/dowdy aesthetic early in her career, Scarlett made a decision to market herself as a sexy sex-bomb. Whether or not that's worth harsh judgement is a matter of opinion, but it's something she actively sought out.

Posted by: Marra Alane at December 21, 2011 4:07 PM

Eh, Hollywood actors have always been expected to fulfill certain archetypes. Scarlett just happens to be a good fit for Lana Turner's sweater.

Posted by: sunny at December 21, 2011 4:12 PM

"Attractive," i.e. in possession of positive or desirable attributes is in no way synonymous with "sexy," i.e. a person (or thing, if that's how your roll) that makes you want to have sex in general, or with whom you want to have sex. It is preferable when those qualities converge in a single person, but hardly necessary. I want to have a conversation with Kathy Bates. I want to bang Eliza Dushku.If you can get off to sparking conversation and witty repartee then more power to you, but I require baser stimulations.

Posted by: Tracer Bullet at December 21, 2011 4:14 PM

Personally I get off on people who make me laugh and are comfortable with themselves. Sure, I have to find them physically attractive, but i'd take a bit of chub on someone I found interesting and wanted to be around over a six pack and nothing of interest emotionally. Of course a happy convergence of the two is always good, but for me, personality and sexiness are deeply intertwined.

Posted by: Whatsyourbeef at December 21, 2011 4:32 PM

I have grown to rather like this girl because I think she is smart and has learned from her initial career mistakes (branding herself a sex bomb). I have grown to hate the public that worships her. They are just breasts. It's kind of pathetic.

Posted by: stump at December 21, 2011 5:02 PM

Waaaaaiiiiit a minute. I have a gorgeous rack and I'm a mediocre actor AND singer. Are you telling me the only thing standing between me and ScarJo's career is me not having an agent? Fuuuuuuck.

Posted by: JenVegas at December 21, 2011 5:22 PM

Photos, JenVegas, otherwise this is bullshit.

Posted by: Kissing Girls Makes You Sleepy at December 21, 2011 5:49 PM

she was perfect in " the girl with the pearl earring" ................................ because she resembled the portrait and,
more important, she didn't have much to say.
she simply can't act .... and " lost in translation " is an all
time snorefest.want a tough question ? who was worse in that
abomination? scarjo or murray ?

Posted by: snake at December 21, 2011 7:02 PM

I also require photographic evidence of this "rack" you speak of, Jen Vegas.

Posted by: stryker1121 at December 21, 2011 7:33 PM

I've gotta agree a bit with stump. While I do think that ScarJo can be faulted for making the active decision to pump up her image using racy pix and the whole sex kitten image, it's ultimately the public that eats that crap up and demands more of her. Boo on the public. I've always said that our nation's devotion to things like "American Idol" prove our stupidity, and, unfortunately, America keeps falling over itself to prove me right.

Posted by: Jelinas at December 21, 2011 7:33 PM

I have tried to go over her career to find some glimmer that she could act well. The problem is that her range is remarkably limited; like a one note vuvuzela. Try as I might, I simply cannot see how she has managed to continued to get the acting gigs she has with her performance abilities. Whatever she's paying her agent- it isn't enough.

She is the same person portrayed regardless of when and where her character is. And what's worse that person isn't particularly pleasant to watch. She often drags down scenes to the point where I wonder if a director has ever had to suppress the urge to slap her in an effort for her to express something past "apathy" and perhaps to keep her mouth closed when she's not talking. In all the years of acting, she has never shown any signs of branching out and evolving. The chops she had as a kid are the same ones she has now. She just sports bigger tits. And that's probably what's kept her in the loop despite often times expressing less interest that a housecat on Quaaludes. If she were flat chested, I dare say she'd be in a perpetual loop playing the part of aloof best friend/second fiddle to someone else... if it all.

Still, despite these limitations, if there are people out there willing to pay her, then congratulations to her are in order, I guess. I would hope she has the foresight to sock away the majority of whatever she's earned thus far for a rainy day. I imagine that before the next decade of her life is up, her career's cashflow will have become as a trickle. Many legitimate actresses of decent ability find that fate anyway, I should think someone of lesser ability would find that more so.

Posted by: bleujayone at December 21, 2011 7:57 PM

"Do you reckon you'll still be crushin' on Dushku when she's 63?" Given the odds that I will be either dead or senile (possibly both) the answer would be yes.

Posted by: clancys_daddy at December 21, 2011 8:14 PM


I predict she'll take those boobs on the road, and end up working in Seattle at one of those bikini barista stands that flash you for an extra $20.

Posted by: John G. at December 21, 2011 9:10 PM

So you say you like boobsalot?

Yes, I like boobsalot.

Boobsalot, boobsalot.

You gotta like boobsalot.

Posted by: , at December 22, 2011 2:15 AM

As my wife commented the first time she saw her in a grown-up role, "Is it just me or does it look like she had a potato parked at the end of her nose?"

She's such a bad actress it desexy-fies her. Watching her trying to play sexy is excruciating.

Posted by: ponch at December 22, 2011 9:51 AM

I like her. She has always been really funny on SNL and is willing to make fun of herself.
She got attendtion because, come on look at the girl. Like Jessica Rabbit said "I'm not bad I'm just drawn that way."

Posted by: daria at December 22, 2011 10:34 AM

Her record with Pete Yorn was actually a commercial success. It went platinum in France and sold well over 100k records in the USA alone. She's a cool chick.

Posted by: Lex at December 22, 2011 4:50 PM

Whilst I also find Scarlett underwhelming and terribly overrated I do like The Island and can't stand Lost in Translation. Saw Vicky Christina Barcelona recently and thought it a snoozefest except for Rebecca Hall.

Posted by: caz at December 23, 2011 7:30 AM

Argh, thank you! I appreciate the fact that the girl stays out of the spotlight normally, but godamn she's a terrible actress. It was painfully obvious that she was out of her element in Iron Man 2, since they had her basically stay silent and sashay around. It's even more bothersome that she'll be playing the main female antagonist in The Avengers. One token female in the movie, and all we get is a pathetic hack with no talent who was clearly picked for the size of her breasts. And she's only going to look worse thanks to the caliber of talent the male stars are bringing to the movie. Nice to know what Marvel values.

Posted by: Jilliterate at December 23, 2011 11:43 PM