web
counter
 

Sparkle and Fade?

By Agent Bedhead | Posted Under Career Assessments | Comments (32)



cullen2.jpg

Subject: Robert Thomas Pattinson, 23-year-old English actor

Date of Assessment: March 12, 2010

Positive Buzzwords: Sparkles, Edward, fangirls

Negative Buzzwords: Sparkles, typecast, shampoo

The Case: Oh, Sparkles. I long to run my hands through your unruly, untamable, and thoroughly unwashed hair. Oh hell. Did I just really type that?

Obviously, I’m referring to Robert Pattinson (hereinafter referred to as “RPattz”), swooner dreamboat to millions (upon millions) of screaming teenage girls and many of their shameless mothers as well. Although RPattz broke his acting teeth upon a minor role, Cedric Diggory, in the rather respectable Harry Potter franchise, his rise to stratospheric fame only began when he accepted the role of vegetarian vampire Edward Cullen in the much maligned (by critics) adaptation of the first installment of Stephanie Meyer’s Mormon lovechild, Twilight. Let me confirm what Dustin already throughly detailed in his review; indeed, this was some of the most throughly awful shit to grace the celluloid screen. Even more perplexing is that fact that audiences, who willingly and repeatedly bought tickets, nearly wholly agreed that Twilight was a dreadfully clichéd movie that nearly perfectly captured the spirit of a dreadfully cliché book. Still, the laughably contrived storytelling — which only encourages the unrealistic expectations of teenage girls — was handsomely rewarded with $396 million at the global box office. Even worse, New Moon raked in $702 worldwide. This summer, Eclipse could do even greater numbers, and there’s really no telling how ridiculously well Breaking Dawn (a.k.a. the creepy CGI baby that broke Bella) shall perform. For the actors of Twilight, however, such certainty is limited to this franchise, and, when the sun sets upon Edward and Bella’s love story, how will RPattz fare as a future movie star?

Well, there’s something to be said for low expectations. On the flip side, the reported eight-figure salary for each member of Breaking Dawn’s unholy trinity — RPattz, Kristen Stewart, and Taylor Lautner — will ensure that none of them will someday be forced to turn to “Celebrity Big Brother” for a meal ticket. Yet, most actors are creatures who desperately and perpetually seek self-validation, so one can be nearly certain that the three Twilight stars will each attempt to forge paths as “serious actors” in Hollywood. During all Twilight-related salary negotiations, the three have famously s[t]uck together in manner of the cast of “Friends” once did. When it comes to post Twilight success, however, will RPattz and colleagues suffer the same curse of “Friends” cast?

Survey says that RPattz might just be the “Rachel” of the Twilight trio by transcending his hairdo, getting dumped by Kristen Stewart, and finding an eternally sympathetic audience who will still flock to a series of pathetic romantic comedies by shall belittle him but still nicely augment the bank account. Alternatively, RPattz could suffer from “Chandler Bing” syndrome by falling into a pit of substance-abuse related weight fluctuations along with the realization that he’s got no real acting range. It’s very difficult to project which direction RPattz’s career shall take, for the Edward Cullen role doesn’t really allow him much room to maneuver and show off any actual acting skills. Yes, RPattz is stilted and uncomfortable as Cullen, but that’s also how his character is written. Ironically, the future success of dreamboat shall be very much dependent on his other roles outside the Twilight Saga, but will audiences allow him to escape his pale-faced and glittering confines?

For what it’s worth (and it ain’t much), here’s what I predict for the Twilight stars: Lautner will start out strong as the highest-paid teenage actor but will lose his appeal after a string of bad role choices as a preemptively-declared action star; Stewart will continue to appear within a string of indie-cred building vehicles but will finally be exposed for the open-mouthed lip biter that we all know so well; RPattz, however, is the wild card. He could follow-up with a string of romantic comedies and quickly fizzle out, or he could pull a Leonard DiCaprio and find himself a sugar daddy director like Martin Scorsese in need of a muse.

The Prognosis: With this weekend’s Remember Me — which, so far, is receiving mixed reactions but whispers of a James Dean-esque turn by RPattz himself — as well as future turns in and Bel Ami (with costars Uma Thurman and Christina Ricci) and Water for Elephants (alongside the likes of Oscar-winners Christoph Watlz and Reese Witherspoon), RPattz could — just maybe — potentially build a respectable career. If all else fails, like I said, he could always dig that well-stocked bank account or even pick up his guitar and try the rock star thing.

Agent Bedhead lives in Tulsa, Oklahoma and can be found at agentbedhead.com.









Hugo Weaving Cast In Captain America | Pajiba Love 03/12/10













Comments

My biggest problem with him is that he mumbles. A lot. Incessantly. But this could be because they keep making him talk in an American accent, which he can't do very well but he tries anyway. And he's always in depressing movies where he can't talk.

I think I'll withhold my judgment of him until I see him in something a bit more lively. Where he gets to have some damn fun already and stop being such an emo idiot, and he gets to talk a lot and do it in his real accent. There's something about him that's kind of charming in interviews, and I really can't blame him for being in Twilight. Apparently he hates that, too.

So I think he has potential, maybe. I liked him in Harry Potter, so he should just get another part like that.

Posted by: figgy at March 12, 2010 12:10 PM

And I have some advice for him:

RPattz, you're cute and seem smart and hate Twihards. My advice to you: either do a full-on gay movie, or come out as gay. You'll get rid of the Twimoms and Twitweens so quickly. You'll be free forever!

Posted by: figgy at March 12, 2010 12:11 PM

Ah, figgy, as it is my week to keep the scepter and its accompanying powers to speak for all the gays, we really don't want him. At all.

Posted by: Drake at March 12, 2010 12:21 PM

Twilight was SO awful, and his acting in it was SO terrible, you wouldn't be able to drag me by the face to see another of his movies. He would literally have to win an Oscar for me to even consider seeing a film with him in it. I can't even watch the Harry Potter movie that he's in (that's a lie -- thank you Clemence Poesy).

Posted by: supasente at March 12, 2010 12:24 PM

I saw this guy on the Daily Show recently and had my first exposure to him that wasn't a posed picture. And whadda you know, he's dumb. Dumb, dumb, dumb, but pretty. His accent is appealing too. So really, he's got everything he needs to succeed in the Hollywood wasteland. I'm just glad he'll be long washed up by the time my girls become old enough to care about such people. Maybe by then the next Johnny Depp will have come along, someone I can get on board with.

Posted by: katy at March 12, 2010 12:29 PM

As I was skimming this article (no offense, Bedhead, it's not you, it's RPattz), I stopped dead and then was thoroughly confused at:

Water for Elephants (alongside the likes of Oscar-winners Christoph Waltz and Reese Witherspoon)

What, is he the kid we're supposed to be rooting for and Reese is the spunky love interest? Oh I am worried. And who is Waltz playing? Inquiring minds want to know! Could he save it from the unfortunate casting of his younger counterparts? Who will play the dwarf? Is anyone really picturing Waltz and RPattz as romantic rivals for Reese's charms? Yeesh.

Posted by: Anne (in Reno) at March 12, 2010 12:36 PM

My wife was watching some awful thing last night and he was being interviewed. This is how clueless I am as to the Twilight phenomenon and its cast members. First words out of my mouth:

"Holy fuck, he's British??"

I honestly had no idea. That said, he seems a likable enough guy, and probably is a fine actor. Once he escapes from the yoke of Twilight, there's no reason he shouldn't be successful. As long as he acts in grownup films.

Posted by: TK at March 12, 2010 12:37 PM

TK, I had the same 'holy fuck' moment when I saw him on the Daily Show too. I had no idea. I am the exact anti-Twilight demographic, too old to care but too young to have kids who are old enough to care.

Posted by: katy at March 12, 2010 12:45 PM

the discovery that Sparkles and Lippy McBites-a-lot conceive a hyper-intelligent chest-burster actually makes me want to see the movie. I probably still won't but might illegally download it and watch it at 12x speed laughing maniacally.

Posted by: koj at March 12, 2010 12:47 PM

I read "Bel Ami" in the last paragraph, and my mind immediately went to the wildly successful gay porn studio by that name. (They're wildly successful because HOLY FUCK HAVE YOU SEEN THEIR CAST?!, and because they put a lot of effort into their production values. No, seriously: www.belamionline.com [NSFW] if you don't believe me.)

The truly sad part is that I read "Bel Ami", interpreted "gay porn", and immediately thought "nah, that'll be Taylor Lautner's eventual future after his legit career fizzles". RPattz, for all his sparkliness, has at least shown flashes of actual talent, even if it was in that Harry Potter movie.

Posted by: jeem at March 12, 2010 12:49 PM

Twilight really is crap and I honestly think RPattz might be the worst actor in the films. Yes, by god, he's attractive as hell... But homeboy is weeeak in the acting department. I've heard him sing and play guitar though, and I honestly think he should stick with that. He's actually got a decent bluesy thing going on for himself. Moving on...
The whole CGI-baby thing. What if they got one of those super-tiny little people to play the baby? Or is that insanely politically incorrect?

Posted by: b at March 12, 2010 12:50 PM

Anyone else notice that in the trailer for Remember Me he still looks like Edward?

Posted by: DeistBrawler at March 12, 2010 1:09 PM

figgy, he DID already play gay as Salvador Dali in Little Ashes. I guess it doesn't count if nobody saw it happen? I'm not sure if he has the chops to break out, but its obvious he's desperate to break into real films and he's at least more gracious than Kristen Stewart is about their overwhelming Twilight popularity.

Posted by: valerie at March 12, 2010 1:20 PM

Prediction:

21-Feb-2013: Clint Eastwood dies.

04-Jul-2013: RPattz stars in "The Clint Eastwood Story: Go ahead, Make my Day."

Posted by: BWeaves at March 12, 2010 2:37 PM

he doesn't have a career he has a body glitter addiction

Posted by: rio at March 12, 2010 2:46 PM

Jesus H Christ Bweaves I read the post and was like, WTF Clint Eastwood DIED??
then I read the date and my heart made it's way back to where it belongs.

Don't do this to me on a Friday, I can't take it.

Posted by: Stella at March 12, 2010 3:11 PM

Hm. I can see some resemblance between Mr P and a young Clint Eastwood. Talent and testosterone levels notwithstanding. But when I look at Lautner, I can only see Luis Guzman in his future. Again, talent and testosterone notwithstanding. Considering the disparities in both comparisons: what a world.

Drake: I know you have the scepter this week, but don't you think he might make someone a nice project for someone? A project with a Barroman or a Cumming might just put a bit of verve into the poor thing.

Posted by: Corvus at March 12, 2010 3:42 PM

i third the daily show british revelation. i did the same thing, "huh?"
also, if i'm not mistaken, i think he is talking about picking up the guitar and trying the rockstar thing. fucking vomit.

Posted by: gem at March 12, 2010 4:21 PM

[whispering] the Cullens aren't vegetarian. they choose to eat forest
animals rather than humans

Yep. I'm out. ;)

Posted by: Ms MoMo at March 12, 2010 5:44 PM

That was such a trashing.

All the poor guy did was accept a role as a vampire in a movie and act alongside a lip-biter.

Egads!

Posted by: Jean at March 12, 2010 6:37 PM

the three have famously suck together in manner of the cast of “Friends” once did.

Both casts sucked together and separately and are sucking still. The best kind of typo, funny and true.

Posted by: OscarTamerz at March 12, 2010 6:59 PM

The guy may be a bad actor, but how much can you really act when covered in glitter?? I guess if he didn't get this part he might have turned out ok... And he sure is hot as hell! I've seen a couple of interviews of his and he was slightly funny and charming. If only he'd had a chance before being sucked into this pool of crap... Now I fear it's to late. Has anyone actually seen anything else he's in to tell us how bad it was (except Harry Potter)??

Posted by: Mariazinha at March 12, 2010 9:05 PM

This dude better save his money. He made his sparkly vampire bed and, rightfully so, he will lie in it for the rest of his "acting" career.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at March 12, 2010 9:23 PM

Wait, bella gives birth to a Xenomorph?

Posted by: Chugga at March 12, 2010 10:11 PM

Let me go the exact opposite way: I think the last thing he needs is to seek out serious acting roles against quality actors. All that will do is put his failings on display for all to see.

That said, he's a good-looking guy and will have options available to him once the Twilight thing dies.

At best, he could have a career-path similar to Keanu Reeves.

Posted by: Fredo at March 13, 2010 1:35 AM

i am going to have to strongly disagree. i think Robert Pattinson did well in the movie and we liked it a lot. He is very talented. Just my opinion.

Posted by: Linda at March 13, 2010 1:06 PM

In fairness Rob can act well. But he needs to do a movie that will fit his personality. He is such a good guy. Remember me, featured him as a brooding guy, but his emotional connection especially with his sister there is commendable.He has depth as a person.The movie though is not well directed, and scripted. Too many issues were presented that do not have closures especially his strained relationship with his Dad. Not to mention the absence of background music around remembering. That could have highlighted the messages that Rob wants the audience to think and reflect about.

Posted by: tess gatchalian at March 13, 2010 10:47 PM

How easy it is to bash someone! Don't you people have anything else to do? Some facts:
Rob already played a gay guy in little ashes.
He doesn't hate twihards, because those are the suppotive ones.(yes, I am one of those shameless mothers! Who cares? I am happy, so why should you care?)
He hates the gossip reading twits who don't even know what they are talking about.
When a guy is as famous as Rob is now, people just like to talk them down. Probably to make their own lives seem a bit more meaningfull or something. I've got great hope for Rob in the future. I have seen all his movies and he is so much more than Edward Cullen(that would be the vampire, for you twits).I'll be in the theater every time he releases a new movie, along with a lot of other people who love this; open, funny, honest and down to earth guy.

From a proud Robsessed twilight mom.

Posted by: snack at March 14, 2010 5:11 AM

please tell me that last post was a joke...

Posted by: byobb at March 14, 2010 3:34 PM

I think snack is just trying to fill the role of crazy Twitard Mom that so many others play across the Internet whenever this "franchise" is mentioned.

Aside: it's not an unfair question to ask where Pattinson's career is going to go post-sparkling. It used to be that being the star of a big franchise was the death knell of a career as you'd get typecast -- just look at Mark Hamill and Star Wars. Actors have gotten wise to that and will work on other things to prevent that from happening -- like Daniel Radcliffe doing Equus and Extras in between Harry Potter movies or even Kristen Stewart doing Adventureland and The Runaways.

But if you're going from romantic lead in a movie to romantic lead in a franchise, you're on your way to getting typecast.

Posted by: Fredo at March 14, 2010 4:46 PM

I've seen some stuff or Pattinson's work. I think he's very good in Harry Potter and shows great potentional. Definitely this indicated an actor with some amount of talent (haven't seen Remember Me yet, but from the traier and reviews seems fine). But I don't know what went wrong with Twilight. In the first movie, he didn't suck all the way long. But n the second... duh, a piee of good would play better than him!
I think he hates the whole Twilight franchise and he got the job just to break out and didn't see this whole thing coming. After landing "serious" roles, I don't see him care a lot about it. But, still, it's a way to earn insanely lots of money and also establish audience for his movies (though I don't know if he wants it anymore, cause it kinda starts of ruining him).
I think Twilight had, in some ways, the opposite effect he wanted in his career. Now he has to stuggle a lot in order to make people get him seriously. But I think he's capable of a decent career.

P.S. I want to do him.

Posted by: BYOB at March 16, 2010 9:16 AM

I read the twilight books, and they were AMAZINGLY FANTASTICAL. robert pattinson's bad acting was only cause of the bad director...and i had the same 'Holy Fuck' moment of some previous commenters.

Posted by: paula(: at October 18, 2010 12:59 PM


















Viral Hits

>> Pajiba Movie Posters

>> Pop Culture's 20 Greatest Dancing GIFs

>> Mindhole Blowers

>> The 100 Greatest Insults of All Time

>> The "Other" 100 Greatest Movie Quotes

>> The 100 Greatest Movie Threats of All Time

>> The Sean Bean Death Reel

>> Chicks Dig Beards: It's Science

>> The Coolest TV Show Title Sequences

>> The Most Rewatchable Movies

>> The Most Expensive Movies of All Time