web
counter
 

She Who Forsaketh the Best of Both Worlds

By Agent Bedhead | Posted Under Career Assessments | Comments (22)



cyrus1sm.jpg

Subject: Miley Ray Cyrus, 17-year-old American actress

Date of Assessment: April 2, 2010

Positive Buzzwords: Spirited, energetic, cute, everygirl

Negative Buzzwords: Spoiled, ungrateful, Heigl-esque, one-note wonder

The Case: For a singer/actress who has never taken a single singing or acting lesson, Miley Cyrus (born Destiny Ray Cyrus) really lucked out in the tweener career department. Yet, by the very source of Miley Cyrus’ stardom, she has also necessarily confined herself. After all, the incredibly successful “Hannah Montana” Disney Channel show definitely qualifies as a franchise in its own right, which means that the bewigged Miley Cyrus can be seen smiling out from backpacks, lunch boxes, t-shirts, clothing, bedspreads, and whatever else one can imagine on the path of ubiquity. Still, “Hannah Montana” isn’t half bad for a crappy Disney production, and it’s even a wee bit clever (though it seems to go over the lead actress’ own head) in its blatant aping of the nature of pop stardom and illusion of privacy that famous types vow to maintain. And yes, Hannah Montana/Miley Cyrus really is a contemporary take on the Superman/Clark Kent mythos — a notion that, when previously discussed, was met with scoffs of derision during my review of Hannah Montana: The Movie, which was also surprisingly decent and brought in a tidy $155 million worldwide gross. Still, one isolated (yet admittedly prolonged and remarkably so during all of Cyrus’ teen years) raging commercial success doesn’t mean that the girl has any acting range of which to speak. Cyrus’ portrayal of a superstar alter ego has always been a wholly unconvincing endeavor, but that was part of the “Hannah Montana” any-girl-can-do-this-crap sort of in-joke. It’s a tactic that was engineered to readily encourage impressionable young girls to whine to their own parents that they really need their own ridiculous blonde wig and special karaoke microphone too.

And so, Cyrus has never been required (or even encouraged) to develop said acting range in exchange for remarkable sums of money. In 2008 alone, playing “Hannah Montana” — a task that included shooting 30 episodes of the show, starring in the Hannah Montana/Miley Cyrus: Best of Both Worlds concert movie, and selling a shitload of albums — earned Cyrus a not-so-shabby $25 million. During the entire five years of the show, it’s fairly safe to say that the tween idol has earned over $100 million to essentially play herself. Of course, Cyrus would claim that she’s not really that much like “Miley Stewart,” but c’mon, the similarities — same first name, Tennessee roots, croaky voice, and douchebag “Achy Breaky” father — between the “actress” and the “character” aren’t exactly inconsequential.

Still, it seems no one can tell the most successful Disney princess what to do, for she’s always been told (even after that infamous Annie Leibovitz shoot for Vanity Fair) that she can do no wrong. So, without any acting lessons and only the experience of playing herself and a common tween fantasy version therein, Cyrus has launched herself headfirst into her very own non-Hannah feature film production, The Last Song. At first glance, this project choice seems rather laughable to those of us who are familiar with the schmaltzy, formulaic crap that Nicholas Sparks regularly churns out. Still, this faux-dramatic romance selection was likely intended to launch Cyrus into the same league of Mandy Moore, who also used a Sparks vehicle (A Walk to Remember) to separate herself from the pop princess pack. Unfortunately, the overwhelming critical response thus far has been that The Last Song is showing uncanny shades of Britney Spears’ Crossroads. Not a good sign, folks.

Naturally, recent pop culture history shall be ignored by the Cyrus camp as the young star continues to pull a Katherine Heigl and will reportedly “rejoice” when she no longer has to “grit” her artificially-whitened teeth while donning that totally annoying “Hannah” wig. How easily Cyrus forgets that, not too long ago, the “teenager with the sixty year old smoker’s voice” sold $250 tickets to her own Sweet 16 birthday party and now, ironically, recoils at the thought of herself as a commodity. And, while she’s burning those oh-so-uncool bridges, Cyrus also plans to quit the music business and gamble her entire future on her so-called movie career. Quite frankly, it’s no wonder that Scientists Warn Miley Cyrus Will Be Depleted by 2013, which is probably a far too generous estimate. I predict an immediate burnout after “Hannah Montana” officially concludes in January 2011.

Prognosis: If Miley Cyrus wishes to continue making ungodly amounts of money in the entertainment business, she must realize that all successful actors must manage themselves as a commodity. Then again, an even more essential step would be to sign up for some acting lessons. Regardless, Cyrus easily possesses enough money to screw up half a dozen future projects and still have money left over for rehab. Then, it will be time for the self-declared, nonexistent “comeback” effort.

Agent Bedhead lives in Tulsa, Oklahoma. She and her little black heart can be found at agentbedhead.com.









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



Eloquent Eloquence 04/02/10 | Pajiba Love 04/02/10









Comments

While I am well aware that I am not the target audience (28, male, cynic, drunk) I simply can not understand the appeal of this cretinous swamp creature. The fact her christian name is Destiny does not help matters.

That header pic isn't doing anyone any favours either.

Posted by: TSF at April 2, 2010 12:24 PM

Like father, like daughter.

I remember when her father was pushed on the public as the next great thing. He was supposed to be the next Elvis or some such crap.

Yeah.

Looks like all he needed was Disney to push his "career".

And I think there is another Cyrus on the way out as well.

Will we never learn?

Posted by: UncleJR at April 2, 2010 12:45 PM

I'd say she could do worse than emulate Mandy Moore, but then I remember, I've never heard either of them sing, I just thought MM was hilarious in Saved!

Posted by: Anne (in Reno) at April 2, 2010 12:51 PM

Let's just hope she doesn't end up like Donnie and Marie in forty years doing shows to middle age adults who squeee just like they were teenagers again. That's just disturbing.

Posted by: bignick at April 2, 2010 1:05 PM

If Paris Hilton can bust her hump taking acting lessons to get small supporting roles (some surprisingly well done) in B-horror movies, Miley Cyrus can take some acting lessons to star in crappy CW-level romantic comedies.

Posted by: Robert at April 2, 2010 1:13 PM

I hope she gets naked someday. Not because I care (I have the internet, after all) but because it will finally mean her career is on the decline.

Posted by: superasente at April 2, 2010 1:33 PM

In a few years, her star's going to start burning out. Billy Ray Douchebag is already grooming her kid sister for the same treatment. As soon as Miley's on the decline, there'll be another Cyrus waiting to snatch that pink, plastic Disney tiara from her ratty blonde wig.

Posted by: Aislinn at April 2, 2010 2:45 PM

I think doing the Nicholas Sparks movie is smart of her. It gets her another movie out on the big screen and one where she won't be expected to stretch any artistic muscle by trying to act.

Ultimately her problem is that she herself is tied to the "Hannah Montana" wave directly and hasn't done anything else to demonstrate a capacity for diversity (like the Harry Potter kids have tried to do). There's no indication that there's any difference between "Miley Stewart" and Miley Cyrus.

Posted by: Fredo at April 2, 2010 3:03 PM

I've got some negative buzzwords for her:

1) squirrel-like
2) most grating voice in the universe

Posted by: figgy at April 2, 2010 3:51 PM

My aunt's neighbor works for the Disney Channel/Company, and is behind Hannah Montana and product design and production. Said neighbor mentioned that Cyrus is impossible to deal with, in his own words "a brat." Can't tell you I was shocked.
I really am half tempted to see The Last Song, simply because I keep thinking of the song of the same name by my favorite band, Sleater-Kinney. Though the sheer awesomeness of Corin Tucker would rock Miley Cyrus' face off and send her crying back to the Mouse.

Posted by: Kamikaze Feminist at April 2, 2010 6:47 PM

Strangely, just yesterday I was thinking, you know, there's no reason this girl couldn't carve out a decent movie career for herself, but it would take her having a full understanding of the fact that what she's been doing all along is not "acting." I don't know that you need lessons and all that crap to become a good actor. I mean, every year it seems like somebody with no background at all (I'm looking at you, Gabby Sidibe) comes along in a movie and draws glowing accolades. Or maybe critics are just overly impressed with an out-of-nowhere story.

In any case, it takes an understanding of who you are and what you can actually do -- what your strengths and limitations are -- and the gumption to try to improve on the things you're not good at.

Thank you for disabusing me of the notion that Cyrus has any idea whatsoever of what "skills" she may actually possess.

What she probably really needs to do is disappear for awhile, go to (community) college, find out how normal people live and speak and think and work and "act." But it appears she's not going to do that, or her handlers are not going to let her.

So fuck her. Like superasante, I'm looking forward to the implants and the yo-yoing weight and the drug rehab and the soft-core porn.

Posted by: , at April 2, 2010 10:13 PM

I admit to watching Hannah Montana: The Movie, although under the influence of some gin mixed with Slurpee. Good times.

What particularly tickled [well, aside from the whole movie, actually] was that the idea of intelligence of this movie was to place a pivotal scene [Will she stay as Miley? Will she choose to be Hannah?] in an actual pivot [i.e., revolving door]. Oooookay.

Posted by: ilikepie at April 2, 2010 10:26 PM

and hasn't done anything else to demonstrate a capacity for diversity (like the Harry Potter kids have tried to do).

Did I miss something? Did one of those awful brats from England do something of note?

The next time I'm sure to see Radcliffe in something I'm interested in, he'll be wearing a jew 'fro, thick bushy moustache, and a leather jack with suede patches. He'll be babbling about some kind of history curriculum while some wisacree wizard in training sweathog with a fake Italian last name is telling him to "stick it up ya nose, wit a rubba hose!".

Daniel Radcliffe in...Welcome Back, Harry Potter

Posted by: D-Day at April 2, 2010 11:42 PM

D-Day, have you not heard of Radcliffe's role in Equus? Apparently he gouges out the eyes of horses and shows his wang. I'm sure there's more, but those are the highlights.

Posted by: Even Stevens at April 3, 2010 12:23 AM

I would consider neither of those "high"lights ma'self.

There was that trailer where the ginger boy is supposed to be all badass and druggy, too. Wooo look at me I can do coke and be rebellious, I'm doing the exact opposite of what I've been typecast as.

Not even the (very, very, very plain looking) girl has done anything of note. Are they as detestable as Miley? No, but to say they've done more diverse things would actually be incorrect (holy crap did I just defend Miley?).

Whatever, all of these people will be gone in 10 years time.

Posted by: D-Day at April 3, 2010 2:03 AM

figgy took the nut right out of my mouth. Every time I catch of glimpse of this girl, I immediately think “chipmunk”.
Apologies for the (admittedly) shallow opinion, but the child is not cute. She’s not even Legoland cute; as in, individual pieces aren’t particularly attention-worthy, let alone all of them put together.
I am sincerely in awe of the machine that has created the Miley Cyrus phenomenon, though. No acting talent, no singing talent, no particularly attractive features, yet somehow they manufactured this tween sensation and the public ate. it. up. How did they do that?? And, more importantly, could it be replicated with just anyone or does she have some hidden appeal that escapes me?

Posted by: courtney at April 3, 2010 8:38 AM

courtney,

You hit on a subject of pointless fascination for me too. TV pretty much proves that if you take any eight random people off the street and give them enough air time, no matter what they do (or don't) they'll develop a following. "American Idol," "Jersey Shore." Don't tell me there aren't a million Snooki fans somewhere.

Why do we need these people? What is it in us that makes us attach ourselves to them? Do we really have the need, or is the need created for us?

It's certainly not just Miley. Why do we need Taylor Swift? What's her fucking POINT? Aren't there already 8,000 blonde, moderately pretty country singers, 7,990 of whom are toiling in obscurity? Why do we fall for tweens and teens mimicking adult emotions when there are actual adults in the same business, every bit as pretty, every bit as good? I think of it as the "dog walking on its hind legs" syndrome: If you're young enough, you don't have to be actually good at it, you just have to amaze enough people that you can do it at all.

But I digress. I think in Miley's case, Disney nailed the "she's not TOO pretty, she's not TOO talented [and she certainly isn't], I could do that too, I could BE HER, i could be A STAR!" fantasy life of a 12-year-old girl, which as I understand it is the whole "Hannah Montana" shtick in a nutshell. If SHE can do that, so can I! It's pretty much what every company on the planet uses to sell us shit we don't need. Disney just happens to be better at it than most. Give the bastards credit, they know their audience and their market and give them what they've been told they want.

"Stokin' the star-maker machinery behind the popular song"

Posted by: , at April 3, 2010 10:12 AM

If they remake the Gremlins movie, which I am surprised someone hasn't, this girl will never ever have to work another day for life. She was born to play Gizmo.

When she showed up the Oscars and couldn't even be respectful enough to stand up straight for a photo, I lost what very little respect I had for her.

Posted by: schrome at April 3, 2010 11:38 AM

I dunno ... I Googled some images (hope I don't have to explain this at work) and I don't see much chipmunk. I see a reasonably pretty 17-y.o. girl, but she's not like WOW! She's pretty like 10,000,000 other 17-y.o. girls. The rest just weren't born with a last name the big guy at the velvet rope would recognize.

Posted by: , at April 3, 2010 5:07 PM

Daniel Radcliffe's done more stage work than cinema, which is sad, because it's not usually enough to produce press and we'll eventually be wondering where he went after Deathly Hallows.

Rupert Grint's done Driving Lessons, Cherrybomb (aforementiond "coke and rebellion" movie), and there's Wild Target coming out on April 23rd in the UK.

Emma Watson's landed a deal with the Burberry fashion line (she looks amazing, imo), as well as released Ballet Shoes and was Princess Pea in The Tales of Despereaux.

The credits aren't exactly "omg, the next big blockbuster," but they've collectively worked at doing more to break their children-friendly images than Miley Cyrus has.

Posted by: duckandcover at April 4, 2010 10:38 PM

Hmmm. Misinformation and stupidity at this site. Miley has had many acting lessons. With private tutors and acting coaches and directors efforts. And Billy Ray tells a story about Miley when she was very young taking an acting lesson.

Miley is such a superstar that her about to be filmed movie, So Undercover, will be filmed in Tennssee and New Orleans. That's obviously at her request. Plus she is making $10 million plus 10% of the gross. And she has many other films in developement. Miley is a real Superstar and people at this site seem clueless about that.

Posted by: mfan at November 8, 2010 8:08 PM

Good riddens to Miley Douchebag.

Posted by: p at November 28, 2010 2:06 AM