web
counter
 

How to Lose Fans & Alienate the Rest of Us

By Agent Bedhead | Posted Under Career Assessments | Comments (61)



foxca9sm.jpg

Subject: Megan Denise Fox, 24-year-old American actress

Date of Assessment: June 18, 2010

Positive Buzzwords: Attractive, sex appeal, youth

Negative Buzzwords: Verbal diarrhea, ungrateful, disposable

The Case: This week’s subject has already been widely discussed in the context of her notable absence from the third Transformers movie. Now, whether or not Megan Fox was fired from or, according to her publicist, actually quit her role as Mikaela Banes (a.k.a. “slo-mo bouncing boobs”) matters very little at this point. More to the point is that Fox will no longer appear in the only successful movies of her career, and she’s got nothing of interest on the horizon. Essentially, her days as an actress are numbered (in the single digits), and we all know it, because that’s what happens to an actress with no talent and a pesky habit of badmouthing her boss at any opportunity.

Whether or not you like MIchael Bay, it’s difficult not to respect the guy’s continued box-office draw. He’s known for directing absolutely atrocious movies like Bad Boys, The Rock, and Armageddon, and has also thrown his mullet-shaped hat into many successful producing endeavors. Of course, Bay’s work is utter crap, but he’s never pretended it to be otherwise. Furthermore, he gave Megan Fox her start in movies back in 2003 in Bad Boys II as the “Stars-and-Stripes Bikini Kid Dancing Under Waterfall.” Then, a few years later, Transformers followed; suddenly, Fox was inexplicably famous, yet she never fully grasped that this wasn’t due to those 37 episodes of “Hope & Faith” that nobody had ever watched. One would think that Fox would have been grateful, but no. Instead, she made a few other movies — How to Lose Friends and Alienate People and Jennifer’s Body — that were both critical and commercial failures. Then, during any and all press tours, Fox used her platform to talk smack about Michael Bay.

In some circles, the theory has been floated that Megan Fox has been needlessly vilified while her Transformers co-star, Shia “Freeballin’” LeBeouf has gone unpunished for the same sins. This is a fruitless comparison, and while it wouldn’t be terribly useful here to regurgitate all of Fox’s bizarre rants about Michael Bay (for the curious, there’s a rather impressive timeline), but here’s one particularly choice quote:

He’s like Napoleon and he wants to create this insane, infamous mad-man reputation. He wants to be like Hitler on his sets, and he is. So he’s a nightmare to work for but when you get him away from set, and he’s not in director mode, I kind of really enjoy his personality because he’s so awkward, so hopelessly awkward. He has no social skills at all. And it’s endearing to watch him. He’s vulnerable and fragile in real life and then on set he’s a tyrant. Shia and I almost die when we make a Transformers movie.

Let’s compare this with Shia LeBeouf’s isolated statement about Transformers II:

When I saw the second movie, I wasn’t impressed with what we did. There were some really wild stunts in it, but the heart was gone.

The differences between these statements are fairly obvious, but the most striking distinction is that Shia constrained his very general remarks to the movie and included himself within the blameworthy parties. His criticisms were also at least somewhat constructive and backed up by his previous participation in a number of blockbusters. In contrast, Megan directly attacked Michael Bay both in his professional and personal capacities, not the least of which was a terribly uncreative Hitler comparison. Further, it’s common knowledge that no one would know who Fox was if Bay hadn’t cast her as the (willing) tits-and-ass in the Transformers franchise. Yet, Fox’s entitled behavior has no basis at all, considering that she’s failed to prove her own box-office mettle outside of the franchise. If anything, Fox’s very public manner of airing her own frustrations is not merely unprofessional but evidence of her own lack of social graces and unwillingness to work as a team player — things that all of us must learn in order to function in the real world. We are all disposable in our professions, and Fox is no exception. Yet, even after the box-office flop that was Jennifer’s Body, Fox persisted in insulting her boss as if she were indispensable.

Look, I continue to agree with the general population in regard to Fox’s physical attractiveness (despite an awe-inspiring amount of plastic surgery). And I’d have no problem with Fox if she were only as gracious as Reese Witherspoon or countless other actresses that have paved the way for Fox herself to make far too much money just for being attractive. Still, any woman who criticizes Megan Fox is often described as “jealous,” because all women supposedly make it their goal in life to capture as many men as possible, and Fox somehow ruins this goal for the rest of womankind. What an entirely simplistic and, quite frankly, sexist assumption. For whatever reason, many men seem to revel in the idea that women automatically hate a starlet because she receives lots of male attention…. but, listen up, male attention isn’t exactly a prize we’d covet enough to hate Megan Fox, who certainly annoyed enough men to ensure that virtually none of them bought a movie ticket for her sole outing as a lead actress either.

One other reason that Megan Fox doesn’t sit well with many women is that, at least for several months, she was getting away with badmouthing her boss in a very public manner. Look, we’ve all had terrible bosses. To be certain, many of them were chauvinistic, small-penis types just like Michael Bay. But that’s life, and you learn to deal with it and either get along with unsavory types, or you move on. Or, if you’ve got an actual legal basis for complaining, you sue their asses in court. Naturally, Fox didn’t have this sort of basis, so she decided to just run Bay through the mill of public opinion. She frequently and publicly whined like a little brat and expected to keep her job because of some odd sense of entitlement. Any one of us, male or female, who did that sort of thing, would have lost their jobs nearly instantaneously.

In closing, I’d also like to make another point about “jealousy,” which is more of an origins-based argument. Remember way back to when you were in elementary school, and a classmate made fun of your glasses or horrible Princess Diana-styled haircut. In response to your tears, your mother probably assured you that these cretins were just “jealous,” right? Think of how little sense that makes to your adult brain, and you’ll realize that mom lied. Of course, mom did so with the expectation that you’d someday understand this little white falsehood when it came time to act like an adult. Unfortunately, Megan Fox missed that stage in development, but there are plenty of other actresses willing to pick up the slack.

Prognosis: The act of rehabilitating a fallen Hollywood career is always difficult (just ask Robert Downey Jr. or Drew Barrymore) but, quite simply, impossible for those who are both ungrateful and unwilling. With a performance in Johan Hex that has already been widely panned, and short of learning how to actually act (both as an actress and as a human being) Fox should probably stick with modeling Emporio Armani underwear. You know, something that doesn’t actually require her to open her mouth.

Agent Bedhead lives in Tulsa, Oklahoma. She and her little black heart can be found at agentbedhead.com.









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



Pajiba Love 06/18/10 | You Sunk My Swede!









Comments

She certainly makes everything she's in prettier. Panties, bikinis, whathaveyou. Hollywood might be getting the message, though, thank goodness. Looks do not a movie star make.

On a personal note, there is absolutely nothing I wouldn't do to, on, or around her.

Posted by: logar at June 18, 2010 2:51 PM

Porn. She should get into porn.

Posted by: DeistBrawler at June 18, 2010 3:00 PM

She's a traditional Hollywood starlet: really pretty, lovely body, not very talented. She will have the same result as her predecessors in a slow slide into "retirement". The only difference I can see between her and her counterparts Heather Graham, Jessica Biel and Jessica Alba is that she doesn't know when to stop talking. Not all of them can be Charlize Theron.

Posted by: Mrs. Julien at June 18, 2010 3:16 PM

Flat-thumb porn. It's a very specific fetish.

Posted by: superasente at June 18, 2010 3:26 PM

Heather Graham is actually talented enough in the acting department that she shouldn't be considered in the same capacity as Megan Fox or Jessica Alba. And, Jessica Biel isn't horrible, she's just kinda boring when not in a bikini.

In all honesty, I prefer people like Megan Fox who can speak their mind, and in her own little way, truth to power. Though, you're right, Bedhead, she hasn't really earned it.

Posted by: RobP at June 18, 2010 3:27 PM

she annoys me most when she's going off about how she "hates when people tell her she's gorgeous or talented" like OMG fishing for compliments much... she is 100% aware of how attractive she is... but when she gives interviews where she claims to be the girl next door or goes on and on and ON about how she loves to be one of the boys... you just want to smack her in her overly tanned face!

personally I liked her in the transformers movies... she was DEFINATELY not the worst thing about them (they were entertaining big-baddah-boom movies but SO WHAT!)

Posted by: Tammers at June 18, 2010 3:40 PM

The Rock is a good movie.

Posted by: Paul D at June 18, 2010 3:43 PM

Funny that I just brought Fox up in conversation last night. I actually like that she says whatever she wants. She's a terrible actress, and I can think of 20 actresses off the top of my head that I consider more attractive, but she never strikes me as particularly bitchy. Plus she slags on Bay and the fucking awful Transformers movies, what's not to like?

So what IS the prediction on Jonah Hex? I have it coming in below 10M which would be kind of amazing but I'm thinking if any movie this summer can do it, it's Jonah Hex.

Posted by: TylerDFC at June 18, 2010 3:44 PM

Ungrateful?

Why should she be grateful for being in some shitty movies? She worked on a movie, she got paid for her work. She disliked this arrangement, and she got out of it. Good for her.

Posted by: ERM at June 18, 2010 4:07 PM

Hmm, okay. Don't they basically hand out nose, tit, and lip jobs for young starlets these days? That's not a particularly "awe-inspiring amount."

This is why the jealousy thing comes up, I think. Megan's probably had about the same amount of work done as Halle Berry. Something about her inspires this kind of hyperbole, and given where we are, it can't well be an abiding love of Michael Bay, now, can it?

Posted by: jon29 at June 18, 2010 4:08 PM

I can't get the timeline thing to load. I will never know what she said or when she said it. Tragedy.

As for plastic surgery, I'm going with nose job, but the rest of it...meh, not convinced.

I only care about this right now because the England vs Algeria came is utterly shit. Losing the will to live.

Posted by: Carrie at June 18, 2010 4:19 PM

Eh, I don't care either way. I get the difference between what LeBeouf said and what she said. I just don't care. It's really difficult to feel badly for a wildly successful movie director after someone says unflattering things about him.

I'm not cutting her any slack, necessarily, just saying, she sounds like lots of other egotistical 24-year-olds. Whiny and poorly educated. I barely pay attention to what they say, no matter what it is.

Obviously, if you hope to get work in Hollywood, slagging on your directors/costars is not a really smart strategy. Especially when you're as easily replaceable as the hot girl. I bet a thousand hot girls hit California every day, hoping to land some part in some movie. Given how unchallenging the hot girl role in any movie is, you could replace Megan Fox in half a day, tops.

Posted by: Slash at June 18, 2010 4:26 PM

I find that a lot of people try to justify liking those to whom they are attracted. Like, no, I'm not so shallow as to just like this person for their (surgically and certainly make-up enhanced) looks! They have a personality I can dig (so long as I wasn't actually hanging out with it) and they say things I could respect (because the person they are speaking out about is even worse than they are). I wish more people would just own up to the "my defense of Megan Fox--I still think she's hot. So, whatever." And really, to be perfectly honest: "I bought into the completely manipulative campaign that told me that Megan Fox is hot and someone I want to do."

Which is what I'm choosing to believe about people who think someone who is as manufactured and generic as she is, is "hot."

We all have our reasons for our rationalizations. ;-)

Posted by: TheHobo at June 18, 2010 4:26 PM

I can't believe I'm defending Megan Fox because I find her abhorrent, but here goes: Her slagging of Michael Bay is the least annoying or repulsive thing she has done. Michael Bay is a sexist sack of crap and can certainly take it. If we must hate her, can we hate her for talking smack about the rest of the female gender?

Posted by: Whitney at June 18, 2010 4:34 PM

I actually found her really candid and funny in an Entertainment Weekly interview a few months back. Other than that I give her no thought. I've seen 20 minutes of the first Transformers, and I was bored silly. Hot ass, boring movie.

Posted by: Julie at June 18, 2010 4:45 PM

I've never gotten the "just jealous" business. I'm crazy jealous of Alison Brie, for example, who is also ridiculously good looking (and smart, and talented at both drama and comedy, and hilarious, and gets to kiss Joel McHale), and has plenty of that oh-so-coveted male attention, and I LOVE her.

And I hate Megan Fox.

Posted by: dsbs at June 18, 2010 4:55 PM

With Fox, I go back to a simple question: is she a draw? While she is extremely attractive, she's not the reason anyone's gone to see her successful movies. And, so far, she's proven incapable of opening a movie on her own.

And the problem of beauty is that it goes away. So she better have one hell of a Plan B.

Posted by: Fredo at June 18, 2010 5:07 PM

She looks a little like Tiffany in that "before" picture. She IS beautiful but she's just such a terrible actress that I actively avoid movies she's in.
I feel kind of bad for her though. Everyone hates the prettiest girl in the room. And for women she's a reminder that we're most valued when we're young and decorative. Since most of us will never ever be so young and decorative, she's like a walking talking reminder of a failure. I'm not jealous, I'm just a little mad we evolved like this.

Posted by: king at June 18, 2010 5:20 PM

Pretty but too thin. Don't really care what she says off camera because I don't know her, never will, and what she says has no more value than joe on the street in the first place.

She's not much of an actress, but she isn't asked to be. She needs to take a serious dramatic role in the next year or two instead of a paycheck, or even go the indie route.

She did do a reasonable funny or die segment for a good cause (education). I'm constantly amazed at the people who seem to be cheering for her to break up with her long time boyfriend - what is wrong with people? Good for them if it's working.

So anyway, from a *career* perspective: her looks are pretty stupendous, and that's her career. She better get cooking on some skills or show them in ways we haven't seen yet, or that will be all that ever defines her.

-Frob

Posted by: frobme at June 18, 2010 5:21 PM

Attractive? Too whom? Mannequinn fetishists?

Posted by: FabMax at June 18, 2010 5:23 PM

Her name in the Transformers movies is Mikaela Banes which sounds a lot like Michael Bay. Is it possible that the Baynis doesn't just suffer from a laughably small penis but also wishes he was a woman? Is this self hate towards his own sexuality the cause for the overblown need for machismo in his "films"? For a man who makes such shallow movies he is truly a tortured soul, a man so damaged he wants the audience to feel his pain the only way he knows how, with loud noises and CGI. The tiny detail of Megan's name in this post has opened up all sorts of doors into the psyche of this modern day Van Gough. If I delve any deeper into the mind of Baynis, I am afraid I will not return.

This little aside indirectly proves my point about Ms. Fox. This post was about her but she is just too damn boring and plastic to even make fun of or comment about.

Posted by: schrome at June 18, 2010 5:27 PM

I enjoy Ms. Fox's puddle of semi-consciousness rambles. No filter between the random firing of three brain cells and the words burbling out. How is this worse than the mechanical recitation of memorized platitudes by starletards who couldn't parse a single sentence from "Run, Spot run."

There's a certain trailer-tramp directness in Megan Fox that I find familiar and even admirable. They may not be deep thoughts, or "appropriate" but they are her own. It's wrong to treat as calculated or self-reflective what is really the unfiltered effluvia of a mind stuck in immediate and direct as its only available gear.

Then again, I'm from the wrong side of the tracks. I have a soft spot for hustling rubes who are none the less OK with who they are, using what they have, trapped in a world they never made. Plus, you know, boobies.

Posted by: BierceAmbrose at June 18, 2010 5:38 PM

my boyfriend thinks she's the best part in Transformer movies and Bay is notoriously difficult on set(Beckinsale yet said it and he wasn't very nice with Johanson and mc Gregor in "the island")

i hope she will stop plastic surgeon because she starts to look weird now

Posted by: caro at June 18, 2010 5:59 PM

i wanted to write her ass was the best part in Transformer movies

Posted by: caro at June 18, 2010 6:00 PM

"But that’s life, and you learn to deal with it and either get along with unsavory types, or you move on. Or, if you’ve got an actual legal basis for complaining, you sue their asses in court."

Really? Those are women's only two options? STFU or sue?

Posted by: ERM at June 18, 2010 6:58 PM

I second Paul D's assertion.

Posted by: LowSlash at June 18, 2010 7:29 PM

The kid in that picture cracks me up. He's got feathered hair, for crying out loud.

Posted by: Turtle at June 18, 2010 7:50 PM

The kid in the picture is Jay Leno.

Posted by: dsbs at June 18, 2010 9:14 PM

Actual Megan Fox quote (from the "Verbal diarrhea" link above:

“I’m horrible to live with. I don’t clean. My clothes end up wherever I take them off. I forget to flush the toilet. Friends will tell me, “Megan, you totally pinched a loaf in my toilet and didn’t flush.”

Bitch would get thrown outside with the cat.

Posted by: Uriah Creep at June 18, 2010 9:27 PM

You know what's sexist?

That the context, intent, appropriateness and content of any given statement can be magically transformed by bone structure. I hope I'm attractive enough to evade the Waist-to-Hip Ratio Oprichniki long enough to dream up a way to justify my existence.

Why should I be apologetic for another person's intellectual turpitude? That speaks of having guano where the head is supposed to be.

You know what's sexist? Shaming women into silence by discounting their arguments as mere jealousy and immaturity. I am menstruating right now though, so how would I know things?

Posted by: Jo 'Mama' Besser at June 18, 2010 11:49 PM

Call it jealousy or whatever you will, but I will always automatically dislike females who receive attention, praise, and elevated status for no reason other than how their ass looks in a skirt. I'm not going to pretend to like this plastic bitch because *god forbid* someone might accuse me of being jealous.

I don't buy the idea that women automatically resent other women who get male attention; every female has a list of girl crushes, and usually the women on that list are very, very appreciated by the male population as well. It all comes down to respect, and women simply do not respect Megan Fox.

Posted by: Dingles at June 19, 2010 12:48 AM

She seems like that girl in high school who had a hot ass, knew it, and thought she'd be able to coast on it for the rest of her life.

Uh, Megan?

Tick tick tick ...

Posted by: , at June 19, 2010 1:17 AM

Who forgets to flush the toilet? Ugh, I don't wanna see your shit.

Posted by: Daisy at June 19, 2010 2:43 AM

~~Call it jealousy or whatever you will, but I will always automatically dislike females who receive attention, praise, and elevated status for no reason other than how their ass looks in a skirt. I'm not going to pretend to like this plastic bitch because *god forbid* someone might accuse me of being jealous.

I don't buy the idea that women automatically resent other women who get male attention; every female has a list of girl crushes, and usually the women on that list are very, very appreciated by the male population as well. It all comes down to respect, and women simply do not respect Megan Fox.

Posted by: Dingles


Amen my dear!! Very to the point.

Posted by: Beckster "tri-tip" Goddess at June 19, 2010 5:19 AM

Quite inexplicably I am going to defend Megan Fox. Yes she bad mouthed her boss, and anyone who did that in a real job would have gotten fired, but how often is someone in a real job going to get asked that kind of question. It is the nature of the press junket that actresses get asked lots of questions and they always have some sort of pageantry bullshit answer. Foxy on the other hand, actually answers the questions. And yeah the answers aren't always appropriate but they are often amusing and always honest.

As for her two other movies:

Jennifer's Body was hilarious. It was horribly miss marketed as legit horror when is is clearly campy B level horror. I still hope that this one can earn a cult following status.

As for How to Lose Friends and Alienate People, yeah, that was an epic fail, but the fail had nothing to do with Foxy. I love Simon Peg, and have ever since I saw a somewhat obscure British show called Spaced. So the pain I felt over this movie had to do with how tragically unfunny Peg was, and had nothing at all to do with Foxy standing around being hot and vacuous. In fact, that was one of the few good things about the film.

Posted by: Morgan Lefai at June 19, 2010 5:29 AM

You know what is annoying to me? Folks who go out of their way to insult her looks, or anyone who might actually find them attractive. I mean, folks keep saying they are not jealous of the attention she gets, but then that just makes the insults even more ridiculous.

Nobody is making you sleep with the woman. It is perfectly fine to not find her somewhat doable. but do you have to go around acting like anyone who does like some sort of subhuman? I mean damn. As everyone has clearly decided, Fox is only good for her looks, and she has spent considerable time cultivating them. But nobody is allowed to actually LIKE her looks, unless they are some some sort of caveman who wants to hump a mannequin?

Really?

I read a lot of people saying she looks "generic". Last time I looked, that meant that she appealed to a large group of people, rather than a specific subset. So it kinda makes sense that a lot of people, regardless of their education or other tastes, might just think she is at least worth a second look. It is in the definition of the word. Go on, look it up. Done? Good. Hell, by even calling her generic or some other synonym, you are tacitly acknowledging her overall attractiveness.

I see no difference between this nonsense and those who bitch about Maggie Gyllenhaal not being "hot enough". What the fuck does that even mean? Can a brotha find both women hot without losing his "good smart man" card? Hell, I still want a Taco Dip Scrabble Orgy with at least half the Pajibettes here, based on comments ALONE (I am horrible at Facebook stalking). Doesn't that give me a little leeway, where I can appreciate a woman who may not be quirkilicious? A woman who may be (gasp, augh) plain ol' hot to a large number of the population?

Look we get it. You want to be a fiercely independent. You don't want people to tell you what you are supposed to like. Guess what? It is kinda too late for that. But hey, you want to keep up with the delusion, go right ahead.

Now shut the fuck up and let me have my moment of sheer physical lust.

Posted by: Vermillion at June 19, 2010 8:02 AM

Oh and by the way, can you please make up your damn minds?

All those films she has done have ranged from panned to outright obliterated on this site, and each and every one had problems outside of Fox. Jennifer's Body (according to Pajiba review and comments) either not that scary or a muddled mess, How to Lose was atrocious and misused Simon Pegg, and Transformers had...well, Michael Bay. Even the Jonah Hex was a dump truck full of bile (as is Prisco's wont), and he outright says she is barely in the film.

But anytime the actual subject of Megan Fox comes up, she is treated like the only problem in those films, as if simply by being there, she made the director more incompetent, the writing more silly, the cast more money-grubbing or hammy. Don't you think you folks are giving her a bit too much credit?

Posted by: Vermillion at June 19, 2010 8:12 AM

But anytime the actual subject of Megan Fox comes up, she is treated like the only problem in those films, as if simply by being there, she made the director more incompetent, the writing more silly, the cast more money-grubbing or hammy. Don't you think you folks are giving her a bit too much credit?

For Jennifer's Body the blame was split evenly between Fox, Diably Cody and the director. And I think the blame for the Transformers movies has always fallen square in the small shaft of Michael Bay's penis.

What can be surmised is that either Megan Fox's agent is lousy at getting her parts in quality movies with good directors or she or someone in her camp is aware of her limitations and only gets her roles where her "acting" is limited to looking hot.

Now is that necessarily a bad thing? No. Many actresses make a fine living as the hot piece of ass in major movie productions. Just like some actresses work best in period piece dramas, Fox's allure and look may be best suited in over the top, summer spectacle.

You wouldn't put Kate Winslet running away from giant robots, would you?

Posted by: Fredo at June 19, 2010 1:10 PM

What can be surmised is that either Megan Fox's agent is lousy at getting her parts in quality movies with good directors or she or someone in her camp is aware of her limitations and only gets her roles where her "acting" is limited to looking hot.

That is what I am saying. It's not like she was in the latest Merchant Ivory production or anything. But people act like she is just so horrible, when, at worst, she is usually the straw that breaks the camel's back.

And it isn't like such a typecast means you can't be good within it. Look at Milla Jovovich. Arguably, all her roles ask her to do is look hot while sad, or hot while angry. But she has a crapload of charisma and talent that allow her to make them much more enjoyable than they should be.

You wouldn't put Kate Winslet running away from giant robots, would you?

Well, if it was like a District 9 sort of deal, or a more satirical piece, I could see it. But in general, no.

Posted by: Vermillion at June 19, 2010 1:29 PM

That is what I am saying. It's not like she was in the latest Merchant Ivory production or anything. But people act like she is just so horrible, when, at worst, she is usually the straw that breaks the camel's back.

I don't know about that. Like I said, in the 2 movies where she's the cornerstone, she's gotten blasted. In the big action films, the blame often goes to Baynis.

Look at Milla Jovovich.

I try as much as I can! Even in those crappy RE movies.

Posted by: Fredo at June 19, 2010 2:33 PM

How thankful I am that a (likely unnecessary) deconstruction of Megan Fox's career has brought such impassioned comments of support and disgust. Without the continued perpetuation of sexism and objectification, she likely would not have experienced the fame that's now starting to fade. Since she hasn't contributed anything unique to her line of profession or the greater culture, then the arguments throughout this comment feed are much ado about nothing. And yes, Michael Bay is a sexist piece of blah, blah blah. But...come on folks, it takes two for sexism to dance. Spend more time encouraging women to not accept these roles in film and culture and less bitching about the men that we already know are viagra dependent pricks.

Posted by: Barnes78 at June 19, 2010 2:37 PM

I think it is pathetic that people blame the woman who coasts by in life on her looks rather than the people who let her coast. She didn't create the system, she is just benefiting from it the only way she can.

Posted by: ERM at June 19, 2010 3:04 PM

ERM, I blame both of them. Of course the system created it, but she is a grown adult. At what age do we say, "Okay, you're now responsible for either benefiting from this flawed system or doing what you can to right the ship" as opposed to, "Okay, you're only a teenager and while we shouldn't be exploiting you, we are. So technically it is solely our fault".

You might find it pathetic, but I find the continual outpouring of justifications and excuses, regardless of what's it about, equally pathetic. Part of the beauty of this country is having the right to freedom of speech, allowing us all to raise our voice to demand a better and higher standard from the institutions that promote sexism, classicism, racism, homophobia, you name it. You have the right and freedom to either berate the system without doing much to change it or berate the system and do anything in your power to help correct it.

Posted by: Barnes78 at June 19, 2010 3:30 PM

Spend more time encouraging women to not accept these roles

Why not? I like to look at pretty women in skimpy clothing! It makes the world a better place. It's what our founding fathers fought for! It's what makes America great!

/raises flag-colored thong
//salutes

Posted by: Fredo at June 19, 2010 4:29 PM

Why not? I like to look at pretty women in skimpy clothing!

Me too! Why can't we say that without folks acting like we are clubbing women over the head and dragging them back to our caves?

It seems to me that saying "those who like Megan Fox sexually are perverts and/or frattards" is just like saying you aren't racist because you have a black friend.

Tell ya this much: nobody is complaining about the folks here talking about the naked dude from True Blood or Fillion's state of pants.

Kinda ironic: it is almost like women are now expected to be superficial and focused solely on sexual gratification, while the men are expected to be all emotional and look beyond the physical and only judge the mind and/or soul of a person.

Posted by: Vermillion at June 19, 2010 6:21 PM

But most people don't berate the system, they just berate the woman who appears to be benefiting most from the system at the moment. People focus all their attention and/or anger at the person with the least amount of power in the flawed system. If you attack the system as well as those that benefit from it, then this isn't directed at you. But people blame and attack the people with the least amount of power in any system because it's simplest. And people are generally dumb and/or lazy.

Posted by: ERM at June 19, 2010 11:24 PM

I mean, I'm generally dumb and lazy too. But I'm right about this.

Posted by: ERM at June 19, 2010 11:25 PM

Megan Fox can't win for losing. she is completely objectified, but when she tries to express her discomfort with this, it comes out as complaining about the boss. like a good object, she should just shut up and take her objectification like a slut. when she reacts against the perception that she is perfect by giving evidence that she is not, she is degraded for being classless. women will always be other women's biggest enemies. and the writer of this blog is living proof of that. jealous much? (yes, this is about jealousy; we envy and attack that which we do not and never will have).

Posted by: la chica at June 19, 2010 11:53 PM

Oh la chica, you're adorable. It's like you found your first social justice community online 5 minutes ago and now you're trying to parrot everything you just read, but you're spitting it back out all wrong. Make 'em proud, kid!

Because obviously, Megan Fox was totally forced to take that Transformers role! FORCED! Why, she thought it was an episode of Masterpiece Mystery Theatre, and how shocked was she - SHOCKED! - to discover that it wasn't?! In fact, she wore a smart pantsuit throughout the entire movie and her skimpy clothes were CGIed in later, much to her shock and dismay. She fairly dropped her monocle into her brandy sniffer while watching the final cut, I say!

You can't fucking have it both ways, guys. You can't gleefully volunteer, REPEATEDLY, to be exploited and objectified, collect the paycheck for not one but TWO blockbuster films, then bitch and moan about it like your parents signed you away into indentured servitude without your consent. If she wanted to be treated seriously, she could've gotten in the fucking talent-based audition line with all the other would-be actresses with too much integrity to take the easy T&A paycheck way out, and then she could be struggling with the rest of them to succeed in this awful, misogynistic industry without having to fall prey to the system.

But she didn't, and not just once. She had plenty of chances to re-evaluate her career track thus far and she has not diverged ONE BIT from her choice. Not after her initial role as bikini girl, not after Transformers 1, possibly not even after Transformers 2 if she really was fired, not really in Jennifer's Body where she was still the slutty one (if she'd played Amanda Seyfried's role, that might've been interesting), not in Jonah Hex where she's playing the whore with a heart of gold and tits always hanging out, and sure as fuck not now seeing as she's modeling, and modeling is a notoriously shallow appearance-based industry that treats women like absolute crap. She hasn't exactly made a transition from shallow titty-actress to charity spokesperson here.

Sorry, when was I supposed to feel bad for her again? Was it somewhere between the paychecks she collected for Transformers 1 and 2? 'Cause at least that stupid bitch gets PAID to be objectified. The rest of us women just have to deal with it in our daily lives without a voluntary opt-in, royalty proceeds, or a gigantic paycheck.

It must be because we're just soooo jealous.

Posted by: Nat Kittyface at June 20, 2010 12:58 AM

Toe thumb, that's all.

Posted by: ben at June 20, 2010 9:47 PM

I'd like to buy her at my price and sell her at hers.

Posted by: , at June 21, 2010 12:58 AM

Porn. She should get into porn.

Agreed. But she'll probably need to be trained. I doubt she has the natural talent for it.

Posted by: I R A Darth Aggie at June 21, 2010 9:57 AM

[i]Oh la chica, you're adorable. It's like you found your first social justice community online 5 minutes ago and now you're trying to parrot everything you just read, but you're spitting it back out all wrong. Make 'em proud, kid![/i]

no, i am expressing my own opinions. In fact if you could put aside your stupid sarcasm and check you will see that my opinion very much goes against the grain. i simply and respectfully disagree with the general trend of pissing on this young woman. you have NO evidence that she has been offered anything other than roles in which she is objectified. you have NO evidence that Megan is being offered other types of roles that she is busy turning down. the truth is that actresses get type-cast and pigeon-holed. Megan is the perfect example of that. but when she tries to speak out against this, she is called classless and ungrateful. women are so unkind to each other, it's frightening.

Posted by: lachica at June 26, 2010 11:04 PM

Agreed. But she'll probably need to be trained. I doubt she has the natural talent for it.

Posted by: replica watches at July 24, 2010 2:47 AM

I really want to get my greasy paws on this! I can already feel my GPA going down until I crack the game!

Posted by: Nana Dominey (Crush the Castle) at October 31, 2010 1:02 AM

Herbert Skutnik

Posted by: Lucia Pesner at November 26, 2010 9:05 AM

I don't think I've seen this described that way before. You really have cleared this up for me. Thanks!

Posted by: Shanda Krupa at December 15, 2010 6:35 PM

The Internet is the very first thing that humanity has constructed that humanity does not perceive, the biggest experiment in anarchy that we've got ever had. ~Eric Schmidt

Posted by: {Bitdefender Review|Bitdefender 2011|Buy Bitdefender} at January 24, 2011 9:34 AM

continue with the the good work on the site. I appreciate it. Could use some more frequent updates, but i'm quite sure that you have got more or better things to do , hehe. :)

Posted by: bangkok guide at January 27, 2011 1:03 AM

Dear admin, thanks for providing this blog post. I found it great. Take care,

Posted by: Diflucan at February 13, 2011 2:56 AM

I couldn't have really asked for a better blog. You happen to be ever present to offer excellent tips, going directly to the point for simple understanding of your readership. You're really a terrific expert in this subject matter. Thank you for always being there for folks like me.

Posted by: zero friction marketing at March 5, 2011 2:24 AM