web
counter
 

Assessing Hugh Jackman: Wolverine & I Are Done, Professionally

By Agent Bedhead | Posted Under Career Assessments | Comments (45)



jackmanca1.jpg

Subject: Hugh Jackman 42-year old Australian actor, singer, and director

Date of Assessment: October 5, 2011

Positive Buzzwords: Diversity, talent, theater

Negative Buzzwords: Van Helsing, Wolverine

The Case: Forgive me for the overall lack of objectivity that shall follow, but I just cannot move past the fact that Hugh Jackman starred in Van Helsing. Yes, I do realize that he’s not solely responsible for that shittastic display of epic proportions, but his direct involvement and profit thereof is a problem, so please consider this introduction as a fair warning that I am unable to be impartial about Jackman.

Look, we all know that Hugh Jackman can sing and dance (even those who didn’t watch Australia, which would include most of the civilized population, will realize as much after watching his Oscar hosting gig). He’s had raging success as a theater actor in the likes of Oklahoma!, Sunset Boulevard, and Walt Disney’s Beauty and the Beast. Clearly, Jackman is a terribly talented man, but is there really a market out there for anything Hugh Jackman-related isn’t inexplicably tied to the hot-tempered mutant known as Wolverine?

Obviously, Jackman is a pretty diverse actor. His roles have ranged from the Outback truck driver turned romance novelist of Paperback Hero; to the womanizing jagoff of Someone Like You; to the computer hacker (and sidekick to John Travolta) of Swordfish; to the time-traveling pantywaist (who romanced Meg Ryan in the last gasps of her dying career) of Kate & Leopold; to the tortured magician of The Prestige; to the cattle drover of Australia; to the skeevy lawyer of Deception; to the budding politician and potential serial killer of Scoop; to his tripartite turn in The Fountain; and so on. This year, he’s starring in Real Steel and Butter, which are both very different roles that highlight his dual nature as tough guy and romantic love interest.

And yet it all comes back to his only financially viable role, Wolverine (X-Men; X2; X-Men Origins: Wolverine), who largely appears in popcorn-munching movies of poor quality but is apparently a huge box-office draw. Although I admit that his X-Men: First Class cameo was a classic moment, that was five seconds of the whole of Wolverine’s cinematic existence. Unfortunately for Jackman, all of his other work and excess of talent all comes back full circle to Wolverine; well that, and fucking Van Helsing. It’s such a damn shame.

Prognosis: Jackman’s still got lots of stuff in various states of production (including Les Misérables, which is a great career move and will utilize his true talents, not that anyone but critics will notice; and The Wolverine, which will do insanely well financially even though Darren Aronofsky stepped out of the project) and in development (something called Avon Man, really?). Still, no matter what he does, I will never forgive him for his participation in Van Helsing. Hell, I will never forgive anyone (not even Kate Beckinsale and her introductory buttshot) for Van Helsing. And when it comes to his continued participation in Wolverine affairs, I can no longer cope with Hugh Jackman despite any amount of shirtless beach jaunts. In the spirit of his former co-star, Christian Bale, I do declare that Hugh Jackman I are over, professionally.

Agent Bedhead lives in Tulsa, Oklahoma. She and her little black heart can be found at Celebitchy.









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



First Look Of Russell Crowe In Superman: Heroic Or Intergalactic Street Person? | A Taxonomy of Time Travel









Comments

Fresh creamery butter. Does it get any better?

Posted by: Socrates_Johnson at October 5, 2011 2:08 PM

I don't know why everyone hates on Van Helsing so much. And I say that as someone who hated Van Helsing. Sure, it was ultimately worthless, but so are so many CGI-filled summer blockbusters. Why is that one movie singled out so much?

Posted by: Todd at October 5, 2011 2:08 PM

I realize this was maybe not the point of your rant, but now I kind of want to see Van Helsing. Anything that can inspire that much venom should at least be good for a laugh, no?

Posted by: Artemis at October 5, 2011 2:10 PM

I've come to embrace Van Helsing as gloriously bad and watch it for that reason alone. To revel in the badness.

Posted by: Juicy Weatherbee at October 5, 2011 2:16 PM

"his only financially viable role"

I take it you haven't heard of "The Boy from Oz".

Posted by: PaddyDog at October 5, 2011 2:19 PM

Bedhead, Let it go. Let Van Helsing go. Hate takes up too much time and energy. Let it go.

Posted by: logan at October 5, 2011 2:21 PM

I don't know why everyone hates on Van Helsing so much.

The movie concludes with a shot that contains two suns. One real; one digital (with Kate Beckinsale's face superimposed onto it). Two suns. One shot. Not for any artistic reason, but because Stephen Sommers is an incompetent ass hat.

Granted, it's possible the DVD cleaned that up, but the theatrical version had two suns in one shot. Two.

Granted part deux, if RiffTrax covered it, I could be convinced to watch it again.

Posted by: RobP at October 5, 2011 2:26 PM

I have no shame when it comes to The Hugh and I will happily watch Someone Like You anytime it's on TV.

Posted by: Lemon Poundcake at October 5, 2011 2:33 PM

Fresh creamery butter. Does it get any better?

Bless you for that, Socrates.

Posted by: admin at October 5, 2011 2:37 PM

Are we hating on his portrayal of Wolverine or on the movies he stars in? Because I think he's a fantastic Logan, but he can't be blamed for the overall quality of the films.

Posted by: MelBivDevoe at October 5, 2011 2:39 PM

I don't understand why the fuck you people are talking about Hugh Jackman.

Posted by: Pfft at October 5, 2011 2:41 PM

I have yet to see Van Helsing. I think he nails the role of Wolverine. For me, that's all I need to know.

Posted by: Matt at October 5, 2011 2:47 PM

You'll have to watch Van Helsing for yourself to really see how much it sucks. Personally, I have incredibly low standards, but yeah, it still sucked and was boring. However, I would watch it ten times before watching League of Extraordinary Gentlemen again.

Posted by: MM at October 5, 2011 2:48 PM

I would take Wolverine behind the high school and get him pregnant in a heartbeat. And I am ONLY going to see Real Steel because of him.

Posted by: blacksred at October 5, 2011 2:53 PM

"I don't understand why the fuck you people are talking about Hugh Jackman."

On one side, we have a movie review site discussing an actor. On the other side, we have a person expressing shock that a movie review site would discuss an actor.

Objectively speaking, which seems more retarded?

Posted by: Craig at October 5, 2011 2:54 PM

"Still, no matter what he does, I will never forgive him for his participation in Van Helsing. Hell, I will never forgive anyone (not even Kate Beckinsale and her introductory buttshot) for Van Helsing. "

It's just not that bad. Superhero and foxy babe fights Dracula with Frankenstein's help, by the director of The Mummy. I knew what I was expecting - what were YOU expecting?
~~~

Posted by: Meander at October 5, 2011 3:02 PM

1st, I object to your use fo the term "retarded" because there are retards in my family. I would refer you to Pajiba's recent discussion of the Johnny Depp Rape Fiasco to decide whether or not your insult was globally appropriate.

2nd, let me clariy: Yes, I am questioning the validity of discussing Hugh Jackman's career. By extension, I am criticizing the validity of the career itself.

Also, I've been drinking, and I don't plan on apologizing to you for it.

Posted by: Pfft at October 5, 2011 3:06 PM

That last comment was for Craigers by the way (Hi Man!). I forgot to address the envelope.

Posted by: Pfft at October 5, 2011 3:07 PM

I approve of any movie where Hugh takes his shirt off.

Posted by: Dingle Berry at October 5, 2011 3:15 PM

I've been tired of Wolverine since Brett Ratner screwed up the franchise. What a load of crap the beginning and the ending of that movie was. That movie left a bad taste in people's mouths; that and the one after it which I forgot the name.

X-Men First Class would've done so much better if people (the stupid movie making people)actually cared about putting out movies that were fun and made sense. They think that tricks, magic and lights are all it takes to entertain people.

I actually think I hate comic book movies now. At least Marvel comic movies and maybe Batman because they have Anne Hathaway as Catwoman. That only leaves Superman and the never gonna get made Wonder Woman movie. I have to go now and break the news to my brother.....I don't know who he's going to discuss his comic movies with now.

Posted by: Candy at October 5, 2011 3:19 PM

P.S. I'm gonna rent Van Helsing. I remember that it was bad but this thread is making me want to refresh my memory. Deadwood is putting a big haze on my attitude. I need a break from watching one episode every night for the last two weeks. Going over to my soon to be cancelled Netflix/Qwikster account......

Posted by: Candy at October 5, 2011 3:23 PM

van helsing was shitballs awesome.

Posted by: gp at October 5, 2011 3:23 PM

Odd to list his Broadway theater credits and skip over the role that won him a Tony Award: The Boy From Oz.

Posted by: Robert at October 5, 2011 3:45 PM

Hugh, drenching himself with a bucket of water in Australia. Ladies, does anything else need to be said?

Posted by: LB at October 5, 2011 3:55 PM

What does it say about me that I loved the ass-tastic Van Helsing, the colostomy bag of shit that is Wolverine, but I hate the musical Oklahoma!

However, I have no interest in seeing Jackman in any of his romantic roles. I prefer him sweaty and tormented. I do admit that I wasn't aware he did musicals, until I saw him co-host the Tony Awards with Neil Patrick Harris. It was impressive, to say the least. It doesn't change the fact that I hate Oklahoma!.

Posted by: Feynmangroupie at October 5, 2011 4:15 PM

re: Ladies, does anything else need to be said? LB

I'd like to say that Australia (no, it's not even worthy of HTML tags) was a terrible film and not even Hugh Jackman could save it with all of his shirts off and all of his chests.

Posted by: Mrs. Julien at October 5, 2011 4:43 PM

What's with the serious basket accentuation in the header photo?

Posted by: Jerry at October 5, 2011 5:41 PM

I'll never be done with Hugh Jackman. Never, not ever. I will, however, be giving Real Steel quite a bit of distance, and perhaps forget it was ever made. Kinda like I did for Van Helsing (til now, that is). WOW was that one ever horrible. He looked hot in the duster, tho.

Posted by: ChickaBoom! at October 5, 2011 5:46 PM

Australia was terrible too, but that's what fast forward is for. Because for minutes at a time, Jackman was delicious. I only have happy memories of that movie, but for me, it was only 10 minutes long.

Posted by: ChickaBoom! at October 5, 2011 5:49 PM

i never understood why Hugh Jackman was so popular in movie world:he's talented but he clearly has "the Angelina Jolie syndrome"(charisma but very few good movies)

Posted by: carrie at October 5, 2011 6:00 PM

I'm one of the few people I know who thought Kate and Leopold was ok and the main reason for it is Jackman. Sure, Liev was there too, but a small role.

Here's the thing. Some of us grew up with Wolverine. Some of us grew up with Wolverine as the only really cool comic book character (with the possible exception of Nexus [look it up, losers]). Jackman was the first live-action person to play Wolverine, and he pulled it off. Sure, he wasn't short and stocky enough, but hell, he sold the surly, cigar-smoking mutant so well that we were all just thrilled our hero was up on that screen and treated with the proper amount of respect we expected.

It's kinda like The Lord of the Rings movies. I'm one of those people who read all three books almost every year. And sometimes The Silmarillion too. The movies were horrifying, as far as accuracy and loyalty to characters, their motivations and personalities as well as the choices and actions they took. Horrifying.

As horrifying as all that was, they still managed to make good movies and stay close enough to the story and even some characters (not to mention locations and props), that hardcore fanatics like myself were and still are simply thrilled that they pulled it off and didn't screw it up terribly, like the Bakshi film or the Ranking Bass cartoons.

Jackman's Wolverine was different from how I'd imagined him, but not so different and even with those differences, Jackman seemed to "get" what the character was really about and pulled it off well. Regardless of how many stupid decisions directors and writers and producers made, Jackman still managed to remain "Wolverine". Hell, I even liked Origins.

Posted by: Protoguy at October 5, 2011 6:05 PM

Sorry, can't hate on "Huge. Jack. Man!" Granted, Van Helsing was sucktastic (although Kate was nice eye-candy), but dude is talented. More importantly, he and his wife are definitely NOT douche-bags. Jackman's a guy I'd share a beer with!

Posted by: MadMike at October 5, 2011 8:03 PM

I must confess that when I stumble upon The Van Helsing Family Singers on one of my channel pilgrimages, I am sucked in every time.

The badness is so gripping, so enticing, so engulfing. It is perfection.

The huge ack-man, however, always makes me think of "talented, working actor." He feeds the machine. Most of the time that's not about making art.

Posted by: BierceAmbrose at October 5, 2011 10:11 PM

I like him. But I never find him attractive unless he's in full Wolverine regalia. With the hair and the sideburns and the SWEAT and dirt and growling and ohmylord, Wolverine.

Posted by: Figgy at October 6, 2011 1:12 AM

there was a time around these here parts that Van Helsing would have got a hangover theatre review and we would have whooped and chortled and tipped a few for bad movies.

and now it are the website that grumbles about wolverine.

that actor assessment listed an awful lot of really good movies before pronouncing his lack of value as an actor.

Posted by: idleprimate at October 6, 2011 4:01 AM

Yeah, when he's clean shaven and shined up he looks too precious.

I also noticed that his family life is similar to what I remember young Mel Gibson's to be like. Non-celeb wife, lotsa kids, good family man persona.

Posted by: Protoguy at October 6, 2011 9:13 AM

Protoguy:

You're wrong about the non-celeb wife. His wife, Deborra Lee Furness is a very famous and respected Australian actor.

Posted by: PaddyDog at October 6, 2011 10:17 AM

My mistake. Apologies to her for being Americentric heh

Posted by: Protoguy at October 6, 2011 10:21 AM

@Protoguy, I remember checking out the first photos of the X-Men cast with my best friend (a huge Wolvie fan.) Parick Stewart was no surprise, Fame Janssen as Jean Grey looked pretty good. And we were terrified of them picking someone like Tom Cruise for Wolverine to add "A list cred" to the film.

Then we were like, "Who the F*%& is Hugh Jackman?" And shortly therafter, were sold from that first photo of him looking surly, with his hair teased just right.

Also, he was on the Daily Show last night. A total blast to watch him just mess around with Jon Stewart.

Posted by: Markus at October 6, 2011 10:25 AM

Why even write this if you voluntarily admit to being profoundly prejudiced against the guy? EVERY big actor has an albatross like Van Helsing in their past. You just feel particularly strongly about this one. Why not get somebody else, who won't focus on and overemphasize this one specific disaster of a film, to write it? Or choose another actor to do a career assessment on?

Your circuitous protestations throughout put one in mind of a person who frequently begins statements with "I don't mean to be an asshole. but..." or "I'm certainly no racist, but..." .. Yes you do! And yes you are!

That's probably over the top in terms of criticism- but why do you feel the need to write about an actor about whom you're miles away from objective?

Posted by: Martin at October 6, 2011 10:43 AM

So we're hating X2 now?

Posted by: nrvs at October 6, 2011 10:45 AM

"Two suns, I repeat ZOMG, two suns!"

Did you fall asleep in high school? Never bother to learn basic facts about the universe? Your college have too good a social life for you to bother with the learnin' end?

First, in real life it's called a binary star system -- yeah, that's TWO SUNS.

Secondly, your rant makes no sense to the entire movie going planet who wants to know if you've heard of a movie franchise called Star Wars? Look it up, Luke's homeworld has TWO SUNS.

Finally, a recent news discovery was all over the place because an actual planet like this has been found. Read it and weep, TWO ZOMG, I SAID TWO. TWO. Hear me? A planet with TWO. SUNS.

"Double-sun 'Star Wars' Planet Discovered"

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2011/09/15/scitech/main20106865.shtml

Nature and reality itself disagree with your idea of necessary "corrections."

Posted by: Chris T at October 6, 2011 11:04 PM

Well... to be fair, I'm pretty sure Van Helsing was supposed to take place on Earth. Which has one sun.

Posted by: Martin at October 7, 2011 10:56 AM

My love affair with Hugh Jackman oficialy ended wth Van Helsing. Terrible is too kind a word!

Posted by: Diviya at October 9, 2011 1:40 AM

I’ve learned a lot from your blog here,Keep on going,I will keep an eye on it,One more thing,plz visit my websites:http://www.christianlouboutinssite-uk.com

Posted by: moncler dudu at October 27, 2011 3:26 AM