web
counter
 

Farrelly Bros. Career Assessment: Spooge Only Shoots So Far

By Agent Bedhead | Posted Under Career Assessments | Comments (15)



farrellysm.jpg

Subject: Peter Farrelly and Bobby Farrelly, two fifty-something American directors, writers, and producers

Date of Assessment: February 25, 2011

Positive Buzzwords: Outrageous, no-holds barred

Negative Buzzwords: Gross-out humor, resistant to growth

The Case: It’s one thing when directors corner a market for a specific type of film, but it’s another matter altogether when an audience begins to outgrow a pair of directors who, quite simply, refuse to mature along with their viewers. That’s the only conclusion that I can glean from the steady box-office decline of the Farrelly Bros, who have continued to recycle their immature potty humor as a means to providing gross-out comedies for an audience who no longer laughs. While these two directors have been stuck up their own asses (figuratively, I hope), R-rated comedy has also witnessed the rise of Judd Apatow, who co-mingles some of the same outrageous comedic aspects with a bit more sweetness and humanity as well as an ever-so-grudging and much appreciated tinge of maturity.

(Just a small note here: For this assessment, all movies will be discussed in terms of worldwide box-office grosses, since the Farrellys appear to have a strange international appeal.)

The continued existence of the Farrelly Bros. is a perplexing matter, for I once (like many of you) enjoyed some of the Farrelly Bros. early hits — Dumb and Dumber ($247 million); There’s Something About Mary ($369 million) — but felt pretty lukewarm about the duo’s follow-ups — Me, Myself and Irene ($149 million); Shallow Hal ($141 million) — which weren’t quite as financially successful either. Their subsequent careers have also endured a few low-grossing duds like Osmosis Jones ($14 million) and Kingpin ($25 million) that mercilessly squandered the talents of Bill Murray and Woody Harrelson, respectively speaking. Lately, the Farrelly Bros. have reached only modest heights with Stuck On You ($65 million) and Fever Pitch ($50 million). It seemed like the world was nearly finished with the Farrellys, but then something strange happened; that is, the success of The Heartbreak Kid, which even strained the tolerance levels of our own Dustin Rowles, who likened the experience of watching the movie to how Tony Montana felt at the end of Scarface and prompted the following declaration:

The Farrelly brothers are done. Yeah — The Heartbreak Kid may swindle $20 million out of an unsuspecting public this weekend, but even those with a comedic threshold so low it’s buried beneath the Mariana trench will realize that Peter and Bobby are cooked. It’s no longer possible in a mainstream studio film to up the ante on gross-out humor.

And there was much rejoicing at Pajiba. Unfortunately and while the movie only brought in $14 million that weekend, the entire box-office run resulted in a $127 million windfall. Exactly how did this happen?

Further, I remain puzzled as to why critics (including myself) used to consider the Farrelly Bros. as a guilty pleasure but now roll our collective eyes to witness the continued stream of dick and poop jokes. Are their movies really worse than they used to be, or have we simply matured as an audience? Why did we previously find it hilarious to witness Jeff Daniels enduring an endless stream of diarrhea upon the toilet or watch Jim Carrey discuss how he named a pet store “I Got Worms” before fantasizing about kissing Lauren Holly and lifting up her skirt to show us her naked ass? Not to mention the fact that critics generally enjoyed watching Jack Black fall in love with a morbidly obese girl or thrilled at Ben Stiller’s beans-and-franks/”bleeder” experience yet drew the line at Stiller’s reaction to vaginal flatulence. In response to this sort of question, a FilmDrunk commenter speculates that the Farrelly Bros. have lost their edge because “[R]eality TV and the internet have taught us that real life is way more fucked up than anything the Farrelly brothers could imagine. Their career ended the day ‘2 Girls 1 Cup’ went viral.” He might have a point, but I don’t believe that can fully explain their dwindling appeal. Quite frankly, this duo’s shtick continues to (and will always) rely almost solely upon bodily function jokes. It’s all gotten a bit tired.

Prognosis: Of course, there’s the possibility that the duo’s built-in audience has merely matured to a point where, say, vaginal flatulence no longer reels in the laughs. This theory further postulates that the Farrelly Bros. haven’t done the necessary legwork to court a younger audience; this assumption is further supported by the premise of this weekend’s Hall Pass, which is geared towards folks of a married age who would allegedly find humor in the prospect of taking a week away from their own stifling marriages. Now, I’m not sure whether the boys have matured at all with Hall Pass, but the reported inclusion of a 40-year old male character who takes a dump on a golf course doesn’t exactly lend much hope.

Naturally, a lot rides upon whether or not the film sinks or swims this weekend, so we’ll see what happens. On the horizon, the Farrelly Brothers only have the forever-gestating The Three Stooges and Walter the Farting Dog. Where the former is concerned, I wouldn’t bet on the movie crawling out of development hell anytime soon. As to the latter, casting the Jonas Brothers probably isn’t the smartest move and just might translate into a financial stinker. Then, maybe the Farrelly Bros. will finally be over.

Agent Bedhead lives in Tulsa, Oklahoma. She and her little black heart can be found at agentbedhead.com.









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



George Clooney Says He Can't Run For Political Office Because He's F*cked Too Many Chicks? Me Too, Cloons. Me Too. | Storytellers: Soldiers of Someone Else's Fortune: The Polish Invasion of Haiti









Comments

Dud though it may be, I loved Kingpin. And Something About Mary remains among my favorites. The rest, meh.

The Farrelly Brothers are really no different from any other comedy director(s). Comedy directors have a short shelf life. The majority burn hot, then lose their mojo or fail to change with their audiences. Look at adjusted box offices for Woody Allen, Mel Brooks, the Abrahms brothers, Ivan Reitman, Harold Ramis, etc., etc. as they get older. Its a pretty steep downward slope from the top. We might already be seeing this from Apatow, but it is a little to early to say.

Posted by: ed newman at February 25, 2011 4:09 PM

Are their movies really worse than they used to be, or have we simply matured as an audience?

I think it's probably a lit bit of both, but the movies are definitely worse as well. I'm not a huge Dumb & Dumber fan, but at least in There's Something About Mary there was some sweetness to go along with the penis zippering and cum gel. Also those jokes were funny and shocking the first time around, but when you're recycling jokes in other films and filling them with far less likeable characters, there's not much value to be found. Like you said, they need to mature with their audience, or at the very least, find an original way to make something fresh and funny. More shock value is not equal to original or funny.

Posted by: Even Stevens at February 25, 2011 4:14 PM

While, over time, I have grown to appreciate several lines from Something About Mary and a scene or two, seeing that in the theater was one of the worst movie-going experiences I have ever had. I am not sure if I just wasn't in the mood or what, but I never laughed once and just grew more and more annoyed with the movie as it went on.

As a result, I don't think I've seen any other Farrelly Brothers movies.

Posted by: Forbiddendonut at February 25, 2011 4:21 PM

Along the same lines as David Mamet, I always found them to be far better writers than directors. Outside Providence proves they have more to offer than the typical gross out humor, but it seems they've gotten lazy in recent years. Not to mention the fact that the Farrellys were able to capitalize on actors like Jim Carrey, (young) Ben Stiller, and Matt Dillon in their earlier successes. Jack Black, Greg Kinnear and Jimmy Fallon just can't do as much with the source material.

Posted by: Brian K at February 25, 2011 4:45 PM

For this assessment, all movies will be discussed in terms of worldwide box-office grosses, since the Farrellys appear to have a strange international appeal.

Yeah, sorry about that.

Posted by: TSF at February 25, 2011 4:46 PM

Is it just me or did they stop advertising movies as coming from the Farrelly Bros? It's obviously no longer a selling point and it's something that used to be so prominent in the advertising. I had no idea Hall Pass was from them until it starting popping up in reviews.

Posted by: valerie at February 25, 2011 5:37 PM

(This was originally posted in the Hall Pass review. Names have been removed and the comment has been edited to better fit in this thread, as well as to protect the innocence.)

The Farrely's lost me after Irene. I laughed at one joke in that movie: When Jim Carrey wakes up in the hotel room, goes to pee, and asks a mortified Renee Zelleweger why he can't control his stream. Funny because it's true. Nothing else in that movie is remotely true.

Which is the direct opposite of Outside Providence. That is a true underappreciated gem. Especially if you like Alex Baldwin doing his best Nor'Eastah accent.

"You hit ah pahhked cahp cahr?!"

Posted by: RobP at February 25, 2011 6:49 PM

Also, Dumb and Dumber is still one of the most quotable movies of my lifetime. I bring out so many lines from that flick, only Jurassic Park comes close in sheer quantity. For me, a big reason why they've lost their touch is because they've lost their sense of character, place, and story to tell jokes. Now, they only focus on the gags.

They're Johnny Knoxville with Final Draft.

Posted by: RobP at February 25, 2011 6:53 PM

Kingpin is their best movie, I find it strange that you'd call it a dud.

Posted by: Paul D at February 25, 2011 7:10 PM

valerie, I thought the same thing. I had no idea it was from the Farrelly brothers. But now I know why it looks so, so terrible.

Posted by: figgy at February 25, 2011 7:16 PM

@RobP -

Your quotable movies to go list include...Jurassic Park...AND...Dumb and Dumber???

"Dr. Grant, my dear Dr. Sattler. Welcome to Jurassic Fart!".

Sigh...just not funny...

Posted by: TrickyHD at February 26, 2011 12:28 AM

OK, first of all, Kingpin was their 2nd movie (it came in between Dumb & Dumber and There's Something About Mary). Not afterwards.

And if you can't love Bill Murray with a bad toupee as the villain in a movie, well, you're just wrong.

As for the Farrellys, I second RobP in that they lost me after Irene, where the movie was stolen outright from Jim Carrey at his peak by Anthony Anderson and his "brothers". That should have been a major red flag.

Maybe ed newman has it right and they just lost whatever they had like most other directors. But part of me thinks that they got so caught up in their antics and gags that they forgot that the core of the story is the characters and their interaction. It's like they've been stuck repeating the same story outline from Mary: Lovable loser, hijinks, cute chick, gags, jerk we want to see lose, something with a penis, wacky people, loser gets girl, credits.

Can't remix that too many times or people catch on and leave you behind.

Posted by: Fredo at February 26, 2011 1:30 AM

I never saw a Farrelly film I didn't hate. I don't mind gross humor, but gross humor with preposterous, contrived setups and poor timing/direction don't do it for me. Reaction shot and music cue! Close up on lousy prosthetic! Snore.

Posted by: robin at February 28, 2011 2:37 PM

First, to adorn the various packages of different colors of clothing. Women’s clothing are richer than men regardless of their number or color. For example, women definitely need more packages to decorate the clothing.

Posted by: Louis Vuitton Replica Handbags at March 15, 2011 3:31 AM

I met Michael Biehn at Dragon Con a couple of years ago. He was so nice, and totally ok with me sitting there unable to say ANYTHING of interest because my brain shut down. I am rubbish around famous people, especially if I have grown up watching their films. He was telling me about being in London for the filming of Aliens, since I live in London, but could I engage? Nope. There's a great picture of me looking dopey sitting next to him.

Posted by: cosplay costumes at April 5, 2011 5:45 AM