web
counter
 

The Death of the Critic, My Ass

By Dustin Rowles | Posted Under Box Office Round-Ups | Comments (20)



110608_satc.jpg

After the robust numbers that Sex and the City 2 put up on Thursday ($14.5 million), there was another round of “the death of the critic” hair-pulling salvos launched on a slow-news Friday, as the last few print critics updated their CVs. But while hard-core SATC moviegoers showed up big on Thursday, the reviews (and bad word of mouth) seemed to take its toll over the weekend as a movie many were predicting to make $70 million over the holiday weekend wound up at $51 million overall (and only $37.1 million over the four-day weekend, which was only good for third place).

Suck it, people lamenting the death of the critic round 5,437. Indeed, movies like SATC 2 only embolden the critic. I bet nearly as many people read Lindy West’s review of that movie over on The Stranger as actually saw the film. Indeed, it’s movies like SATC that bring out the best in critics, I daresay, and while a movie critic may not make a huge impact on the box-office, the best ones offer valuable cultural commentary. So, congratulations, movie critics: You helped put a 3 - 5 percent dent in the final box-office returns over the weekend, but more importantly, many of you — or at least those that didn’t recycle “whore,” “hag,” and “bitch” over and over — managed to say something relevant about contemporary culture.

In second place over the weekend was the other big debut, Prince of Persia, which capitalized on the lack of anything else better to see. Seriously: There were several occasions over the weekend where I thought I’d really like to go see a movie right now, and then remembered that the only movie in theaters that I had not seen was Prince of Persia. I stayed home and rewatched DVDs, instead. Meanwhile, parents angling to get their kids out of the house for a few hours forced their indifferent teenagers to go experience Gyllenhaal’s abs to the tune of $37.8 million.

As I remarked in last weekend’s box-office round-up: While Shrek Forever After didn’t quite meet opening weekend expectations, we knew it’d have good legs. It’s the only thing the 3D theaters are showing, and there weren’t a lot of other family film offerings over the weekend. Indeed, Shrek 4 had a very small 21 percent drop, adding another $55 million to bring its total up to $145 million after 11 days and claim to number one spot at the box office for the second weekend in a row. You can expect $250 million domestic, easily.

The rest of the top ten were holdovers. Iron Man 2 added another $20 million and Robin Hood added $13 million. The difference between those two $200 million budgeted movies? Iron Man 2 is going to make $125 million profit domestically, while Robin Hood is going to lose $100 million domestically (but don’t fret for Russell Crowe; the movie has already added more than $150 million internationally and is in the black after three weeks). One other note: MacGruber added less than $2 million in its second weekend and will barely crack its $10 million budget. (It’s worth noting, too, that for a movie that was released in over 2500 theaters, MacGruber had the 9th worst opening of all time last weekend).









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



The World Celebrates this Fake Plastic Woman-Like Person | Pajiba Whip Its | Insanely Hot Ginger Relegated to Karaoke Back-Up Dancer | Your Yearly Wil Wheaton Goodness









Comments

SATC 2 number one? Okay, I guess I'm not surprised, but I can't help but gag on the stank of unchecked privilege and clashity clash clash outfits.

No wonder I spent the weekend marathoning old episodes of Bones.

Posted by: Ruth at June 1, 2010 12:26 AM

So they'll only budget $100 mil for SATC3 instead of $150 mil. Hooray for critics!

Posted by: Fredo at June 1, 2010 12:28 AM

at least those that didn’t recycle “whore,” “hag,” and “bitch” over and over — managed to say something relevant about contemporary culture

Are you suggesting that recycling "whore", "hag", and "bitch' aren't relevant to our current culture?

Posted by: EricD at June 1, 2010 1:50 AM

BTW, read io9's thesis that SATC2 was sci-fi:

http://io9.com/5550558/why-sex-and-the-city-2-is-a-science-fiction-movie

Posted by: Fredo at June 1, 2010 2:01 AM

50 million a flop? On what planet is that a flop?
Can someone clue me in here?

I think the Bounty Hunter made $21 million and came in third for its opening weekend, but all the Aniston fans are screaming it's a wild hit. I have no clue what film numbers mean anymore.

AND, stop congratulating yourself, you critics give yourselves WAY too much credit.

Plus, the sexism from some critics reeks. Can these people review a movie on its merits without having to throw in some degrading anti-female comments? It makes me respect them even less than I already do.

Posted by: Just my opinion at June 1, 2010 2:40 AM

HI FIVE ROWLES!

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at June 1, 2010 7:31 AM

I love the passive aggression inherent in posting under the name "Just my opinion".

Posted by: Craig at June 1, 2010 9:29 AM

SATC 2 was a terrible, terrible movie. Yet everyone I've talked to in my circle of friends loved it. It makes me sad.

Posted by: Whorish Mouth at June 1, 2010 9:43 AM

"in the red after only three weeks" Do you mean "in the black", as in, it's made an overall profit? Or do you mean it's in the red after three whole weeks?

Posted by: kat at June 1, 2010 10:00 AM

AND, stop congratulating yourself, you critics give yourselves WAY too much credit.

To be fair, that sounds pretty plain-ole'-aggressive.

Posted by: superasente at June 1, 2010 10:24 AM

Over the weekend I watched series finale of The Wire. Great show. Too bad the Emmy voters never watched it.

Posted by: John W at June 1, 2010 10:25 AM

Gee, now the spambot seems to be selling something called "John W" and is recycling comments we made like 5 years ago.

Burn!

Posted by: becks at June 1, 2010 10:47 AM

John W:

Why are you mentioning The Wire in a comment thread about 'SATC2' and the relevance of movie critics??

How dare you impose your opinion of a highly-esteemed, literate and quality series on a thread that clearly avoids anything even closely relating to 'good taste'?

But yeah, I'm really just jealous that The Wire experience is still relatively fresh for you, a sensation that I deeply miss, especially when reading about it here.

You lucky bastard, you.

Posted by: C Wrench at June 1, 2010 10:59 AM

AND, stop congratulating yourself, you critics give yourselves WAY too much credit.
Plus, the sexism from some critics reeks. Can these people review a movie on its merits without having to throw in some degrading anti-female comments? It makes me respect them even less than I already do.
Posted by: Just my opinion at June 1, 2010 2:40 AM


I love some of the comments by the drop-ins these days, they're almost as much fun as spambot!

Posted by: Xtreme at June 1, 2010 11:00 AM

The odd thing is that per a very good friend who works in the designer section of Harrods, many burkha-wearing women in Abu Dhabi do actually wear hideous over-priced designer clothing under their robes. They fly in groups to London, have private fashion shows, buy up the store and then parade them for the girlfriends at parties when the men leave the room.

Posted by: PaddyDog at June 1, 2010 11:05 AM

I saw Micmacs and Solitary Man over the weekend. Yay for living in a big city.

The former I recommend--Jeunet delivers the whimsical goods again--the latter, I can't, despite a solid Michael Douglas performance as a supremely smarmy dude.

Posted by: icecreammang at June 1, 2010 11:42 AM

SATC 2 was a terrible, terrible movie. Yet everyone I've talked to in my circle of friends loved it. It makes me sad.

But it’s supposed to be terrible, that is sort of the point. I’m planning to see SATC2 with my gay BFF because:

(A) I’m expecting it will provide extra 30 minutes of delightfully bitchy conversation over the cocktails which we will have subsequent to the viewing of SATC 2;
(B) It will temporarily plug the void of bitchylessness that has lately developed due to lack of noteworthy crap in pop culture (it will do until Twilight 3 comes out, and that one will see me though till September, I hope);
(C) I find it comforting to witness general mayhem that the unstoppable passage of time inevitably causes on the four women's skin -- however slow the process may be, it enables me to supplement my mothers’ favourite “time heals all wounds” with “at no cost other than wrinkles”;
(D) I love shoes (shut up).

Posted by: SB at June 1, 2010 11:58 AM

Every parent knows that candy is crap, but the kids still love it.

Posted by: Odnon at June 1, 2010 12:09 PM

SATC 2 wasn't killed by critics' reviews. Rather, it suffered due to extremely poor word of mouth. When die hard fands can't say much that's positive about the movie, you know you're in trouble. Expect a huge drop off in week 2.

Posted by: Candigirl1968 at June 1, 2010 12:57 PM

Even the trailer for this movie looked boring and terrible. As much as I would like to ascribe a higher purpose to this movie failing to meet expectations, I think it was due to bad marketing of a bad idea for a story.

Posted by: Mez at June 1, 2010 3:33 PM