blogspot
visitor
The Curious Case of Indifference | Pajiba - Scathing Reviews for Bitchy People

bejamin-button-01_680341c.jpg
Quit Telling Your Stupid Story about the Stupid Reverse Aging and Just Die Already! Die!

The Weekly Box-Office Round-Up / Dustin Rowles

Box Office Round-Ups | January 5, 2009 | Comments (73)


5. Valkyrie ($14 million; $60 million): You know what? The haters can go screw. I don’t care if Tom Cruise worships alien pedophiles and sleeps with Tom Brady, Valkyrie is the best movie among this weekend’s top five grossers. And that’s not even a dig at the other four (though, the other four are pretty awful). And by the by, why do people keep insisting that Valkyrie represents Cruise’s comeback? He had one minor flop (and it’s not like Lions for Lambs had a decent shot, with or without him), and before that, he had eight straight $100 million flicks and no real duds since 1992’s Far and Away. His reputation may have taken a hit, but the man still has a helluva talent for picking scripts.

4. Yes Man ($14 million; $79 million): It’s a shame that Jim Carrey — a better actor than Cruise — doesn’t have the same knack for choosing quality scripts. And hey! It looks like Yes Man will cross $100 million, but no one is talking about this being his comeback movie, even though his last movie, The Number 23, was not only a bomb, but one fucking terrible movie and maybe the worst script choice that Carrey has ever made. He’s made some terrible movies, but at least they’re consistent with his reputation. The Number 23? Not so much.

3. The Curious Case of Benjamin Button ($18.4 million; $79 million): This has got to be the worst movie among all the major awards contenders this year. Terrible. But Ted’s right, it’s probably gonna pull a Crash and win Best Picture. It’s too long, too boring, and too obvious not to. Hell, it’s Titanic, The English Patient and Forrest Gump all rolled into one. And for cultural relevancy, Eric Roth threw in Hurricane Katrina for absolutely no fucking reason. It can’t miss! Gah! What a miserable three hours. And has anyone not noticed that, besides the name and the reverse-aging premise, the movie has nothing to do with the F. Scott Fitzgerald short-story. In fact, it’s a lot more similar to Andrew Sean Greer’s 2004 novel, The Confessions of Max Tivioli, which I read in a shorter period of time than it took to watch the Brad Pitt movie.

2. Bedtime Stories ($20.3 million; $85 million): Bedtime Stories was pretty awful, but I’ll give it this: At least it wasn’t The Curious Case of Benjamin Button. In fact, for the next month, any movie that’s not The Curious Case of Benjamin Button automatically wins the benefit of the doubt. Seriously: I don’t care how talented David Fincher is, or how great Brad Pitt is, that movie blew soil.

1. Marley and Me ($24 million; $106 million): For those of you who think you know how Marley and Me ends, well: You’re right. The dog does die. But what’s nice about Marley and Me is that it doesn’t take three hours before the dog dies, and when the dog does die, you’re not so bored by indifference that you could not possibly care less. Compare that to The Curious Case of Benjamin Button, which is falsely titled — halfway through, your curiosity dries up, shrivels into a corner, and self-immolates. They should’ve called it The Curious Case of Utter and Complete Indifference. Seriously, if you’re considering going to see The Curious Case of Benjamin Button, do yourself a favor: Take a $10 bill, throw it in a sewer grate, and then spend the next three hours with your face down on the wet pavement sticking your arm through that grate trying to retrieve the $10 bill. You’ll have a much better time.

… and, completely unrelated, The Other Boo steered me toward a painting called, Blessed Saint Architeuthi, details of which can be found here. I think he may be Godtopus’ Deity cousin. Check him out:


saint-architeuthis-20081209-094311.jpg


Inkheart Book Review | Matt Smith to be New Doctor Who





Comments

I think I've crossed into another dimension. "Blessed Saint Architeuthi" is frightening, amazing, creepy, beautiful, stunning, freaky...[I'm running out of words].

Posted by: OldSchool at January 5, 2009 9:08 AM

Really? Why all the Benjamin Button hate?
Don't listen to him, folks. It's a good movie.

Posted by: Girlnone at January 5, 2009 9:12 AM

See, folks, further proof that Rowles is a degenerate freak: he's a raging Scientologist.

He's probably running one of their Centers.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at January 5, 2009 9:16 AM

I liked Benjamin Button, mostly because the narration was fucking poetry, but it was way too long. And I agree with Dustin, that katrina reference was useless. I felt like the only reason they included it was so they could have water rushing at the clock in the end. Fucking stupid.

Posted by: Marra at January 5, 2009 9:18 AM

I need that picture in velvet on my living room wall.

Posted by: Edwina the Magnificent at January 5, 2009 9:18 AM

Also, Is it weird that I want to be a scientologist? I just want to take that test and be in on all their crazy secrets. It's the same reason I want to become Mormon or check myself into a mental institution: I just want to find out what happens in there.

Posted by: Marra at January 5, 2009 9:20 AM

Hell yeah, Tom Cruise is awesome.

A friend of mine was bad mouthing Valkyrie and I challenged them to come up with a Tom Cruise movie that they didn't like. All he could muster was Far and Away, which the whole world will admit is a terrible movie. He's crazy, but consistent.

Posted by: courtney 2 at January 5, 2009 9:21 AM

Now, let's not get hasty here. TCCBB doesn't make the Academy feel better about their moral fiber. There isn't any over the top racism and "shocking" revelations to make them feel special for not being like that. The Man ain't trying to bring down Queenie for being b-l-a-c-k here.

No, if anything, TCCBB is the new Babel. Meaning, a ton of undeserved nominations brought about by the wow factor of visuals/span and scope, one or two worthwhile ones, and an unquestionable win for Original Score. Pitt won't get in again (just like Babel) and neither will Blanchett (just like Babel).

Posted by: Robert at January 5, 2009 9:22 AM

Hot damn, that critter needs to be our new mascot.

Posted by: Cindy at January 5, 2009 9:23 AM

Gee right off the top of my head:

Days of Thunder
Mission Impossible 2
Mission Impossible 3
Eyes Wide Shut (I wish they had been shut)
Vanilla Sky...

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at January 5, 2009 9:26 AM

Marra, join the Masons too. I mean, while you're at it. They've got gravitas.

... also, thank you for defending The Cruise. I don't give a crap about his personal life, man knows how to make a decent movie.

Posted by: twig at January 5, 2009 9:30 AM

MI:2 was a script/director failure. Cruise was not responsible.

Man, Days of Thunder. That's going back a bit.

Posted by: twig at January 5, 2009 9:32 AM

Marra, same here. I think if I were to become famous, I'd probably join Scientology just to know what the fuck really goes down there. But first I'd build a secret hideout and set up some documentation for an alias and store a lot of cash so I'd be safe once I informed the world of my findings.

Posted by: Alice at January 5, 2009 9:32 AM

Hell, it's Titanic, The English Patient and Forrest Gump all rolled into one.

That nicely sums up the high and the low points of Button. I enjoyed it overall in spite of its raging flaws, not the least of which is its knack for bludgeoning the viewer with sentiment. I fault Roth first and foremost; he clearly borrowed heavily from his Gump-ian bag of tricks. Conversely, I think Fincher saved this movie from being the utterly loathsome steaming turd it surely would have been in almost any other hands.

On a completely unrelated note, am I the only one who thinks that the squid portrait started life as a picture of somebody's finger and that the eye is sitting square on the knuckle?

Posted by: Che Grovera at January 5, 2009 9:36 AM

Thou shalt not speak unkindly about Days of Thunder.

Posted by: grumpyoldman at January 5, 2009 9:37 AM

You Cruise apologists make me sick.

So lemme get this straight, when the movie is semi-decent it's all him, a Cruise "masterpiece" but when it sucks it's director's/someone else's fault?

Get the fuck OUTTA HERE! MI2 was directed by John Woo, but Tommy the midget, was a producer and he made it ALL ABOUT...HIM, *he* ruined the Mission Impossible concept, forever. I suppose it was Kubrick's fault for EWS too?

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at January 5, 2009 9:38 AM

I need that picture in velvet on my living room wall.

While velvet paintings are classy and timeless, I fear that the tough economy will drive more business to the velour painting industry.

Posted by: branded at January 5, 2009 9:39 AM

It's funny...the minute Dustin defends him, all the Cruise lovers come out of the damn woodwork.

My personal detestation extends much further back than his ridiculous antics of the past several years. I don't care about his personal life either, though I tend to feel when you make that big an idiot of yourself and imprint that on the viewing public, it kind of ruins the suspension of disbelief. But no, I've hated him since Rain Man. Yes, Rain Man, there I said it. Because he tries too fucking hard. It's all just a little too...much, with him. And it bothers me. So no, even though I considered breaking my boycott for Valkyrie (which I'm sure is a fine film in spite of Cruise's actressin'), not gonna happen now.

Maybe I'm too contrary.

And for you Girlnone...no...just...no.

Posted by: Smokin at January 5, 2009 9:42 AM

While velvet paintings are classy and timeless, I fear that the tough economy will drive more business to the velour painting industry.

Brilliant.

Posted by: Marra at January 5, 2009 9:42 AM

Mission: Impossible 3 was a great movie! whatchoo talkin' 'bout, Slim?

Even forgetting about Cruise, it had Evil Phillip Seymour Hoffman being his Hoffmaniest, Michelle Monaghan, Simon Pegg, Keri Russell, Lawrence Fishburne, Jonathan Rhys Meyers, Ving Rhames, Billy Crudup, and Maggie Q. That is a fucking phenomenal cast, and they pulled off a pretty great action movie.

Posted by: Snath at January 5, 2009 9:43 AM

MI3, does NOT hold up to repeat viewings, PSH was hammier than a Dak 12 pounder and Cruise was just awkward as hell. And don't even get me started on Morpheous and his bullshit.

That was NOT Mission Impossible folks, that was Die Hard 2, with a midget.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at January 5, 2009 9:48 AM

I walked out of "Born on the Fourth of July." But that was also a while ago.

Posted by: Mad Monk at January 5, 2009 9:53 AM

And another thing, the day I can suspend disbelief long enough to believe a FAT FUCK, like Phillip Seymour Hoffman has the strength to smack around an IMF agent without choking and drowning in his own sweat is the day I buy the Twilight Director's Cut.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at January 5, 2009 9:54 AM

Meh. I can't stand Tom Cruise and that is mainly due to his batshit crazy world views, but also massive overexposure. That being said, I really want to see Valkyrie, especially since my girl Carice van Houten is in it.

Oh and Slim, you were totally spot on in your Tom "Crazypants" Cruise list of suck!

Posted by: Pants at January 5, 2009 9:55 AM

So lemme get this straight, when the movie is semi-decent it's all him, a Cruise "masterpiece" but when it sucks it's director's/someone else's fault?

I never said he made 'masterpieces.' He just doesn't make movies worse. He's a serviceable actor.

MI:2 had about a scoop and a half too much Woo, and I like him as a director.

Posted by: twig at January 5, 2009 9:55 AM

Well, the giant squid art is pretty cool, but it's no Maximus "Godtopus".

I don't know who's to blame for EWS, but my god, that was awful. It was so awful even boobs and naughty sex couldn't redeem it.

Posted by: Anna von Beaverplatz at January 5, 2009 9:59 AM

Hot damn, that critter needs to be our new mascot.
--------------------------------------
Posted by: Cindy at January 5, 2009 9:23 AM

SACRILEDGE!

Thou shalt not have any other pretend diety before Godtopus.

Maybe he could be some sort of offspring. You know, like Jebus, Except in this case he is the result of filthy, deviant sex with the village whore. None of that immaculate conception shit around here.

Posted by: admin at January 5, 2009 10:00 AM

So....I take it Dustin didn't like Benjamin Button?

Indeed, the biggest problem with the Mission: Impossible movies was that they were called "Mission: Impossible". I can enjoy them fine (even M:I2)as long as I ignore anything connected to the original show. When Peter Graves tells you to fuck off, something is wrong. (Seriously is that show on DVD yet? Damn.)

The only movie I can honestly admit I liked Tom Cruise in was Collateral. This is the movie where he played a narcissistic, misanthropic, borderline psycho killer. Hint, hint.

Posted by: Vermillion at January 5, 2009 10:07 AM

Okay, that thing is pretty cool, but I still prefer Skits' Godtopus a little more. Only instead of velvet, I want Godtopus drawn on me. So pretty...

Oh, it's good to be back home with you crazy fuckers.

Posted by: Jeremy Feist at January 5, 2009 10:07 AM

I really don't like Tom Cruise outside of his films, for all the obvious reasons, but somehow I continue to mostly enjoy his movies. I honestly don't know what's wrong with me.

Oh, right; I'm retarded. I own both The Last Samurai, and War of the Worlds. I have bad taste in movies!

Posted by: Snath at January 5, 2009 10:12 AM

Thou shalt not have any other pretend diety before Godtopus.

That's why I most purposefully said the critter should be our new mascot - not our new deity. Wake up and smell the farts admin!

Posted by: Cindy at January 5, 2009 10:12 AM

i like to pretend that tom cruise wrote, directed and produced "eyes wide shut", then used the power of xenu and high heeled boots to force kubrick to put his name on it.

i do the same thing with sidney poitier and "ghost dad", with the coz summoning the power of jello and sexual harassment to get his way with mr. tibbs.

Posted by: celery at January 5, 2009 10:12 AM

BSlim now that you've gotten your fake Tom Cruise outrage out of your system I expect you at any moment now to implore phil to cue some music, because we don't hear that shit enough.

Posted by: Pookie at January 5, 2009 10:14 AM

The only movie I can honestly admit I liked Tom Cruise in was Collateral. This is the movie where he played a narcissistic, misanthropic, borderline psycho killer. Hint, hint.

Posted by: Vermillion at January 5, 2009 10:07 AM

-------------------------------------------------

Agreed, on all counts.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at January 5, 2009 10:15 AM

Far and Away came out when I was twelve years old I loved it desperately, rewatched it a couple months ago and still kind of love it. Colm Meany! Tom's silly accent, Nicole looking like a really pretty actual human being, bloody fist fights, fast-forwarding through that one scene where they're daydreaming in that fancy house, the whole big horse race part...no one else gonna fess up to this one, huh? "Tell me you like my hat!" Screw you assholes.

Posted by: HB at January 5, 2009 10:15 AM

I nominate "Cheesus" as the son of Godtopus. It's the unholy union of our beloved Godtopus and a wheel of Swiss cheese. There are so many holes, you see. Enough for all the lovely tentacles.

How could He resist that cheese wheel, especially when it kept looking at Him that way? Rawr, you naughty cheese! You're going to make Him come over there!

Posted by: Snath at January 5, 2009 10:16 AM

I expect you at any moment now to implore phil to cue some music, because we don't hear that shit enough.

Posted by: Pookie at January 5, 2009 10:14 AM
-----------------------------------------------

I'll tell him to cue some 70's porn sounds as soon as you start cyber-sexing/harassing the females and talking about your fake wife.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at January 5, 2009 10:18 AM

Only instead of velvet, I want Godtopus drawn on me. So pretty...

Wait, is there anyone out there inked with the Godtopus or some other kind of Pajiba tattoo? A MurderTank on your lower back? WBNS on the fronts of shoulders? A teardrop for every EE win?

Boo? Alex the Odd?

Posted by: branded at January 5, 2009 10:21 AM

And another thing, the day I can suspend disbelief long enough to believe a FAT FUCK, like Phillip Seymour Hoffman has the strength to smack around an IMF agent without choking and drowning in his own sweat is the day I buy the Twilight Director's Cut.

Barbado, with all due reverence, queue up the 3.5 hour long version of Twilight becuase PSH is the Jack Bauer of Oscar winners. I once heard that he choked a man with a garrote made of Oscar gold, simply because the first words out of his mouth weren't "Your excellency". Turned out the guy was a terrorist anyway, but still that's badassed.

I'm sorry, while you may be a legend in these parts, I will not let you defile the great Hoffman the second.

Posted by: Mike R. at January 5, 2009 10:22 AM

That's why I most purposefully said the critter should be our new mascot - not our new deity. Wake up and smell the farts admin!

I must admit that I've never been chastised with flatulence before. I'm somewhat confused as to how I'm supposed to feel right now, other than nauseous.

Posted by: admin at January 5, 2009 10:28 AM

Eh, I'm not ragging on PSH's acting chops, just sayin' some things are just NOT believable.

Did he have fun with that character, definitely. Can I buy him throwing around another human being like he was Triple H?

Nooooooooooo.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at January 5, 2009 10:29 AM

The reverse aging tact was used on screen in Mork and Mindy for the love of St. Archi(teuthi). The show was trying to hang on so Mork and Mindy have a kid. But, it was delivered via egg from the planet Ork and was in the form of Jonathan Winters. While I am sure Pitt does it a little better, I think I have the premise down.

Cruise wise I actually like A Few Good Men. The bottom line is he has had a solid career regardless of his belief system. My promblem with him is his attitude, he is always right and never makes a mistake, and then backs it up with his toothy grin.

Posted by: richmac at January 5, 2009 10:33 AM

BSlim,

Hey buddy I'm just saying that you go the phil card every fucking day, maybe if you said something remotely interesting Rowles would do a retrospective of your work. But hey I don't want to talk about anything negative, I hope we can remain pajiba friends. The only thing I was trying to say was that after calling on phil the first one hundred times it gets kinda old you know. But nevertheless you're still my favorite person here at pajiba.

Posted by: Pookie at January 5, 2009 10:54 AM

The only real bad part about Button is it's almost certain Oscar grab over the clearly superior Dark Knight. Other than that, it's a fine film, but don't blame it, blame the academy.

They sometimes get it right, like with Return of the King, Casablanca, and the Godfather movies. But my god do they fuck things up often. Star Wars lost, most comedies aren't even nominated, and somehow Tom Cruise lost for Big, but won for Gump. I don't hate Gump, but I hate it's Oscars.

However, I fucking detest both Crash and it's two Oscars. It was fucking terrible! That's it, I'm hosting my own award show! The George awards! I'll get writing right now! I cannot allow the countless award shows we have right know to keep fucking things up!

Posted by: George at January 5, 2009 10:59 AM

Tom Cruise lost for Big, but won for Gump...

This is simply brilliant. If Cruise was in Big he would've won 'cause he would have stomped the shit out of that floor piano.

All I can imaging is Tommy Cruise delivering the line "Mama always said stupid is as stupid does" with that intense Mission Impossible "something's gonna blow up" stare.

Posted by: admin at January 5, 2009 11:07 AM

You're an angry little man dustin...

Posted by: Todd at January 5, 2009 11:08 AM

Tom Cruise + tighty whities + Bob Seeger + Rebecca DeMornay + "making love on a real train" = awesome

Tom Cruise + damn near anything else = suck

(this comes to you from the teenager who still lives within)

Posted by: dammitjanet at January 5, 2009 11:09 AM

Posted by: Pookie at January 5, 2009 10:54 AM


I'm just gonna keep doing whatever the hell I feel like doing bubba.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at January 5, 2009 11:12 AM

richmac,

I referenced Mork and Mindy on TCCBB review comments. I had forgotten about the egg from Ork, though. I imagine Pam Dawber was relieved she did not have to deliver a full grown Jonathan Winters.

Posted by: rlr260 at January 5, 2009 11:48 AM

"Maybe he could be some sort of offspring. You know, like Jebus, Except in this case he is the result of filthy, deviant sex with the village whore. None of that immaculate conception shit around here."
Posted by: admin at January 5, 2009 10:00 AM

Yeah, you're gonna' have to narrow that part down a bit...

Posted by: Lainey at January 5, 2009 11:54 AM

All I know is Tom Cruise has come to me in a nightmare with Barbara Walters in tow and he acted all nice, but really he wanted to eat my eyeballs with a grapefruit spoon, so I will not ever look upon his face. It fills me with dread, it does.

Thanks for the heads up on TCCOBB. I get way too antsy with the long movies nowdays. They need to be 15 minutes long.

Posted by: Anastasia Beaverhausen at January 5, 2009 12:01 PM

I think saying Tom Cruise is serviceable is pretty accurate. I don't hate his movies, but they are generally...okay. My problem with him as an actor is that he's always Tom Cruise. It seems no matter what role he plays, he's not the character, he's Tom Cruise.

Posted by: Michellery at January 5, 2009 12:03 PM

I'm somewhat confused as to how I'm supposed to feel right now, other than nauseous.

No offense intended.

Posted by: Cindy at January 5, 2009 12:08 PM

So you're saying "Marley & Me" is a comedy?

Posted by: Tracer Bullet at January 5, 2009 12:25 PM

BSlim's list of bad Cruise films merely scratches the surface. Are you people too young to remember the painful rectal itch of "Cocktail?" And homoerosticity aside, "Top Gun" sucks it.

Posted by: jimbob at January 5, 2009 12:29 PM

I'm done with your hating on Crash, and I'm definitely done with your hating on Benjamin Button. Is it the best movie of the year? No. But it's a sure sight better than, say, Titanic. And yes, it was better than Valkyrie. I liked them both, but Valkyrie lacked the absolute emotional punch that Button delivered every fifteen minutes or so.

That said, there isn't a single movie released this year that was perfect, and the best picture category will be squallor compared to last year's list. I'll make a quick case for The Dark Knight however. Why it might win: The Oscars want to please viewers by awarding a movie they've actually seen to negate rising resentment among the populace. Anytime the Academy feels pressure, it caves. Also, it's a gritty crime film featuring a villain that transcends the film he's in, very similar to No Country For Old Men and Silence of the Lambs. It's a fairly dark film, as the last three best picture winners are. And it's an adapted screenplay, which you know the Academy eats up for some reason.

Posted by: Audiosuede at January 5, 2009 12:30 PM

the painful rectal itch of "Cocktail"?


OOOF! I had blocked that out.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at January 5, 2009 12:44 PM

No offense intended.

None taken.

Yeah, you're gonna' have to narrow that part down a bit...

It doesn't have to be narrowed down Lainey. He shall have them all. Every. Single. One. They will all succumb to the majesty of Godtopus. (And his magical vibrating tenticles)

It's religion, it doesn't have to make sense.

Posted by: admin at January 5, 2009 1:00 PM

[While velvet paintings are classy and timeless, I fear that the tough economy will drive more business to the velour painting industry.]

Where can I order it on microsuede?
I don't want it to clash with the recliner.

Posted by: Walter at January 5, 2009 1:08 PM

You're being too generous. The Curious Case Of Benjamin Button barely even has anything to do with the reverse-aging premise.

No kidding, right? A three-hour movie and that motherfucker barely even talks about what it's like to be a guy who ages in reverse. Fincher/Roth treat it like a minor inconvenience -- like a really bad mole or something. There was zero introspection. And come the fuck on: He was, like, 36 or 37 when he had his daughter-- tell me why he couldn't have hung around and been a Dad for a good 20 years? That's more than a lot of fathers get. And tell me why 2 long, tedious hours were devoted to the first half of his life, but hardly nothing was devoted to those years in India, where the wisdom and the experience he had as the only person in the freakin' history of the world to age backwards might've been valuable. I am so beyond annoyed with that movie it's ridiculous, moreso because of the very tenuous relationship it had with the short story. -- DR

Posted by: DarthCorleone at January 5, 2009 1:16 PM

Hmmm...I really thought Benjamin Button was gonna be...ok. I was even going to go watch it whenever it came to Honduras (a couple of oh...years I guess) but now I'm thinking I'll wait for the DVD. Because it's skippable, you know. But the more I hear about it the more it seems to be one of those movies where Brad Pitt tries desperately to be a serious actor by looking really intensely into the distance and pouting those gross lips of his while everything around him emotes in sepia tones and sad music.

I think I'll skip it.

Posted by: figgy at January 5, 2009 1:50 PM

While velvet paintings are classy and timeless, I fear that the tough economy will drive more business to the velour painting industry.

Screw the economy, baby! I'm willing to barter my left ovary for that there Popetapus gazing benevolently upon my home from a luscious bed of sweet, sweet velvet.

Posted by: Edwina the Magnificent at January 5, 2009 2:40 PM

All the benjamin button hate... because THE MOVIE IS AWFUL!!! I just read a funny review of it here: http://jillianmadison.com/2008/12/benjamin-button-sucked/

funny observations in the comments section too.

Posted by: alexis-sunshine at January 5, 2009 2:46 PM

Correct me if I'm wrong, but last I checked, in the christian tradition at least, saints are followers of a religion/deity, not offspring of said deity. So clearly, St. Architeuthi is a follower of Godtopus not its offspring.

Che - now that you mention it, yes, it does remind me of a thumb. And now I'm a bit creeped out.

Posted by: tamatha at January 5, 2009 3:13 PM

Went through about 3/4th of comments and realized I had job and life...

Anyways, I actually liked and enjoyed the Button. yeah, it was gimmicky, CG old man/young boy Brad Pitt creepy, Katrina reference little off-put and too much unwarranted present-day flash forwards. But I liked the story, message, acting and the pace of it. It had so many quotable lines and I am sucker for poetry it showed through the sentimentality and beautiful New Orleans cinematography. I LOVE that city.

And for Cruise-hate... Well, I don't know if I can convince myself enough to watch any movie he is in. I did like Collateral, Mission Impossible 3, Last Samurai (because that movie was more for present Japanese people to remind them of the time we had principles) and even Eyes Wide Shut. I guess I am a minority. But, still, I do hate the man's guts and he's trying too hard acting irks me to Godpus denominated raging hell.

Posted by: yocean at January 5, 2009 3:21 PM

Thank you figgy, for finally speaking the truth. He totally DOES have gross lips. Ew. Can you imagine how nasty they will look when he's geriatric?

Also...HB...I love that movie too. Except for the part where someone called NicKid a "strawberry tart", that was ridic.

Posted by: TryScience at January 5, 2009 3:22 PM

The heavy-lidded eye of Blessed Saint Architeuthi says it all: Sees all, knows all, is bored by all. Clearly the patron saint of ennui and an apt representative for all this Oscar talk.

Posted by: jimbob at January 5, 2009 3:28 PM

Dustin>> We're on the exact same page. There's not one moment in the film in which his condition is truly limiting, much less interestingly explored. How is ending up in a retirement home as someone who looks like a child any different than ending up as a regular old man in a retirement home? At least give us a few conversations in which Benjamin is forced to try to fit in for appearance's sake and give us a taste of what that might be like. For example, what if a social worker had discovered him and forced him to go to elementary school? What would his conversations with the other kids have been like? What would it be like to embrace the physicality (perhaps via athletics) of a young man's body at that age?

And yet - despite the fact that everyone in Benjamin's life accepts him as he is - we have this peculiar decision you mention at the end of the second act to abandon Daisy and his child. WHY? It was completely unsympathetic and mystifying and lost me. I agree: at least 20 years could have been spent with them. I don't see why he couldn't have lived his whole life with them, though. Tell your daughter about it honestly and have her practice discretion. Will Benjamin and Daisy get strange looks when he's 18 and she's 60? Sure, but they can make up a story and keep their private life behind closed doors.

At least try to sell me on the fact that Benjamin needs to leave; Roth (and I criticize Roth because the flaw is in the writing - Fincher's direction is solid) expects us to take it for granted that it's a necessity when we have not seen one moment of genuine discrimination against Benjamin up to that point. (Perhaps you can cite the incident when Benjamin and Daisy are children and they're playing under the table, but I think they would have gotten in trouble in that scenario regardless.)

Otherwise, all we have is a sprawling story about a guy who lives a long time, meets a bunch of people, and falls in love. Aging backward is completely incidental.

And don't even get me started on the frame story. It takes them two hours to tell me that she's Benjamin's daughter? I had that figured out in about two minutes. Add that to the fact that Daisy barely plays a major role in the story until she and Benjamin finally do become a couple, and I found the whole frame story rather distancing.

Posted by: DarthCorleone at January 5, 2009 3:53 PM

Ben Button wasn't that bad...but if it wasn't actually based on the short story, then I am even more disappointed. It was really really really slow as it progressed towards the end, which was inevitable. David Fincher could have done better, and he has done better than this movie. On that note, I can't wait to see The Wrestler!

Posted by: ph at January 5, 2009 4:01 PM

HB - I agree with you. In fact, I like a lot of Cruise's "bad movies" (ie Far & Away, Cocktail) better than some of the other "serious" stuff he's done.

At any rate, quit your bitching about the fact that Button borrows little but the aging-backwards-fact from the original story. Dustin, have you read the story? Has ANYONE besides me read the story? It had limited characterization, little depth beyond the novelty of the concept, and quite frankly, was more boring to me (as a huge Fitzgerald fan, and English teacher to boot) than the movie. I didn't have a hard time believing why no one questioned Benjamin's age... probably because it appeared that most characters simply assumed he was whatever age he appeared to be (um, aside from the old folks who accepted it, because hell, they're old, what do they care?). Nor did I question why he left -- he figured it would be easier on his child, leaving before she knew him versus leaving after she could remember him. And, finally, I didn't think any additional India scenes were necessary, as I imagine he lived a rather monastic life. I really enjoyed this movie, length and melodrama and all.

Posted by: Ariel at January 5, 2009 6:42 PM

I'm shocked by this Benjamin Button hate. It certainly wasn't the greatest movie of the year but I really enjoyed it (and considering the movie ended after midnight for me it really held my interest). Benjamin Button is a lot more intelligent and subtle a film then Crash.

Posted by: Michelle at January 5, 2009 7:19 PM

I also -1 The TCCBB hate. I loved it, I loved it, I loved it. It even made my eyes water a fair bit. The length didn't bother me at all. Life's f'ing long. Almost uncomfortably long. Like this movie.

And when the lead characters were in their 40s, they were pretty easy on the eyes too.

Posted by: Lydia at January 7, 2009 3:40 AM

LiPayZ hi! http://msn.com my site

Posted by: gosha03 at February 13, 2009 2:39 AM





Video ads popping up after each page view? Try clearing your browser's cookies.