web
counter
 

The 10 Biggest Costume Dramas of All Time (Sort of)

By Dustin Rowles | Posted Under Box Office Round-Ups | Comments (24)



2010_the_kings_speech_001.jpg

The big news at the weekend box-office was not that The Rite (review soon to come) took the number one spot, with a decent $15 million (decent, that is, for an old person movie — 64 percent of attendees were over 25), or that The Mechanic debuted softly at number three, with $11.5 million (which is on par with most of Statham’s flicks, save for the bad opening of Crank: High Voltage), or even that — with no new female targeted movies, No Strings Attached held on to number two with $13.5 million. The bigger news was the Oscar bumps for several movies, particularly The King’s Speech, which had its biggest weekend yet with $11.1 million. The Black Swan and The Fighter also held well, adding $5.1 million and $4.1 million to their respective totals, while True Grit actually increased over last week’s numbers, adding $7.6 million.

What’s most unusual here for Oscar flicks is that seven of the ten Best Picture nominees have already surpassed $100 million at the box office or likely will before the end of their run (this is most surprising, perhaps, for The King’s Speech, which is a Best Picture nominee and a historical costume drama, which is like 17 strikes against it, for box office purposes).

The only three best picture nominees not likely to break $100 million are The Kids Are All Right ($20 million), Winter’s Bone ($6 million) and 127 Hours ($13 million).

For some context on the amazing success of The King’s Speech, depending on how loosely or narrowly you apply the Costume Drama label (and assuming it’s even loose enough to include The King’s Speech), it’s $72 million actually makes it the biggest costume drama of all time.

Here are the top ten costume dramas, as defined by The Numbers.

1. The King’s Speech — $72 million (and counting)

2. The Prestige — $53 million

3. Sense and Sensibility — $42 million

4. The Illusionist — $39 million

5. Pride and Prejudice — $38 million

6. The Other Boleyn Girl — $26 million

7. Howard’s End — $25 million

8. The Remains of the Day — $22 million

9. Emma — $22 million

10. Becoming Jane — $18 million


Note, however, that I’m not sure how The Numbers categorizes costume dramas. Atonement ($50 million), for instance, feels like a costume drama to me, as does The Age of Innocence ($32 million), but neither are included. You could also probably include Titanic or Cold Mountain or Elizabeth Sommersby. So, clearly, the definition of “costume drama” for these purposes is up for debate. But I like this particular definition because The King’s Speech is number one.

Either way, The King’s Speech is doing remarkably well for a movie with no special effects, no mind-bending plot, no huge stars, and a somewhat unknown director. It’s a performance piece, and it’s nice to see that it’s appreciated by audiences.









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



Javier Bardem Has Been Cast in Everything | Toss Jeffrey Dean Morgan a Bone Will You Javier? | Ice Cube and Ryan Seacrest In New Year's Eve | TK OUT!









Comments

I've always hated that stupid Costume Drama label.

Having said that, I hate Costume Dramaz.

Posted by: zeke the pig at January 31, 2011 11:06 AM

...'Dramas' not 'Dramaz.' I love Costume Dramaz.

Posted by: zeke the pig at January 31, 2011 11:07 AM

I've always thought of "costume drama" as a piece in which the story is inseparably intertwined with the customs of the time in which it takes place.

Titanic: not really a costume drama, other than, you know, being a specific ship.

A Knight's Tale: not a costume drama

Atonement: Is a costume drama. Wouldn't have made sense without the culturally motivated lie.

Posted by: Ian at January 31, 2011 11:10 AM

Elizabeth Sommersby is definitely a costume drama. As is Elizabeth, if King's Speech is to be included. Perhaps moreso. But Sommersby is really more of a period travesty than a costume drama.

Posted by: YLlama at January 31, 2011 11:16 AM

What, no Dangerous Liaisons? I can't believe that wasn't a box office hit.

Posted by: Amandahugandkiss at January 31, 2011 11:18 AM

Very interesting column Rowles, my money would have been on “The Age of Innocence.” The scene with Daniel Day Lewis walking down a busy public street in slow motion with other businessmen in their black coats and holding on to their bowlers was pure Scorsese.

Posted by: Pookie at January 31, 2011 11:21 AM

Saw it this weekend, and it was good!

But if it wins Best Picture, I will be disappointed. So many great films this year, it just felt too safe and easy-to-swallow for my tastes.

Posted by: ChristianH at January 31, 2011 11:31 AM

The Prestige is a costume drama? I had never even considered that as a possibility. But I guess it makes sense.

Huh.

Posted by: A-schaef at January 31, 2011 11:33 AM

I always thought the "costume drama" label was for movies that are primarily interesting because of their setting and costumes. "Marie Antoinette" for example. I don't see how a thriller like "The Prestige" fits because the costumes are not the first thing you think of with that movie and were really incidental to the story.

Posted by: TylerDFC at January 31, 2011 11:37 AM

The King's Speech was good enough, I guess. It was a scrawny story and a rather weak script absolutely elevated by the performances of it's acting troupe.

Posted by: James S at January 31, 2011 11:41 AM

The King's Speech is a nice little film. Colin Firth does an awesome job but I can't help feeling it's Oscar worthy because its the closest the Academy has to a cripple movie this year, and because last year they had to honor Jeff Bridges who was great but not at all his greatest role or stretch as an actor.

Dustin: have you ever compiled a list of actors who got the Oscar one year because they were robbed the year or two before?

Colin Firth
A Single Man: robbed
King's Speech: Oscar

Judi Dench
Mrs. Brown: robbed
Shakespeare in Love: Oscar

Paul Newman
The Verdict: robbed
The Color of Money: Oscar

Posted by: PaddyDog at January 31, 2011 11:42 AM

I second the question of Dangerous Liasons, but also...Gone with the Wind, perhaps? Or is that too "epic" to be "costume drama?"

Posted by: Sara Tonin at January 31, 2011 11:59 AM

Apparently the term "costume drama" is limited to movies with whiteys.

Posted by: Todd at January 31, 2011 12:01 PM

GWTW definitely. What about Gladiator? It looks like costume dramas are defined by being British and Austen-y. The list makes no sense at all to me.

Posted by: xoxoxoe at January 31, 2011 12:41 PM

When it comes to books and TV I feel pretty secure in my opinions, but I've never considered myself a movie buff, so take the following with a grain of salt - I absolutely adored The King's Speech. It is the only movie I have ever exited the theatre from thinking "that's an Oscar performance/movie if I've ever seen one." Its success makes me happy.

Posted by: dsbs at January 31, 2011 1:35 PM

Agree with you 100% dsbs. I thought the actors and script made me care deeply about what I'd have thought was a minor footnote in history (Oh wow, he has a stammer, the horror) and the film was compelling and touching. The witty exchanges, the interesting takes on historical figures, the pace, the genuine emotion I had for a man who could have come off unsympathetic, everything worked in that film. It would be my pick as well.

Posted by: becks at January 31, 2011 1:50 PM

If I'm not mistaken didn't Shakespeare in Love make like a hundred million dollars?

Posted by: aroorda at January 31, 2011 2:54 PM

I was going to comment on Shakespeare in Love as well. I would most certainly call that a costume drama...

Posted by: DominaNefret at January 31, 2011 3:39 PM

Yeah - Shakespeare in Love was my first thought and it did do over $100 m domestic.

So, I really don't get this definition of "costume drama."

Going back to 1966, A Man for All Seasons did $25 million worldwide (no idea how that translates into current dollars.)

In 1969, The Lion in Winter did $22 m

I'm thinking if dollars are adjusted either A Man for All Seasons or The Lion in Winter blow away several titles on the list.

Posted by: Judith at January 31, 2011 4:17 PM

Hell, if we're really deciding "all time" is all time as opposed to the past 15 years, in 1963, Cleopatra did $48 million. That's got to be some serious 2011 dollars.

Posted by: PaddyDog at January 31, 2011 4:39 PM

Does no one find it noteworthy that this week True Grit passed Little Fockers?

Posted by: LwoodPDowd at January 31, 2011 7:37 PM

Zefirelli's Romeo & Juliet (1968)grossed ~$38Million in the US. The Merchant/Ivory production of A Room With A View (1985) barely grossed $20Million in the US, which surprised me. I would be interested to know the equivalent in 2010 dollars. Richard Lester's The Three Musketeers 1974) & The Four Musketeers (1975) are more comedy than drama (althought the latter is heavier on the drama)and therefore may not qualify as costume drama. But these are two of the best costumed films, IMO. Unfortunately, I could not find the box office figures for either?!

Posted by: Yemayah at January 31, 2011 10:46 PM

I'm confused. How does The King's Speech have no huge stars? How do we define "huge"? Do they have to be American, conventionally good-looking, and paid like Brad Pitt before we call a star huge? I look at the careers of all the main characters of The King's Speech and I am blown away.
Honestly, if Colin Firth, Helena Bonham Carter, and Geoffrey Rush aren't "huge," then I don't know who the hell is.

Posted by: katyv at February 1, 2011 10:16 AM

Interesting that Titanic takes place in...what 1913? and The King's Speech takes place in...1936-1939 and yet The King's Speech is considered a costume drama while Titanic is not. OK.

That being said. Does it not excite anyone that in the US, we are beginning to value Oscar worthy movies over trivial Hollywood crap? Well I shouldn't say over...but a nice little balance seems to be restored a bit. As far as the King's Speech goes, people can relate to speech issues...and I guess in a way it brings the King down to our level? Yes?

katyv, I think Rowles is talking about megastars that the vast general public would know: Will Smith, Brad Pitt, Angelina Joline, Julia Roberts....stars like that. However, I think Helena Bonham Carter and Geoffery Rush, while maybe not HUGE, are as close to being known widely by the general public as "Bellatrix in Harry Potter" or "the bad guy from the first Pirates movie". OH those guys! Yea.

Posted by: Littlejon2001 at February 1, 2011 12:30 PM