web
counter
 

Steven Spielberg's 10 Biggest Box Office Hits and Is There a Spielberg Bias Among Critics?

By Dustin Rowles | Posted Under Box Office Round-Ups | Comments (21)



indy4-ford-shia450_1274131913 (1).jpg

As I suggested in my not terribly flattering review of J.J. Abrams Super 8, I admired that the director, along with producer Steven Spielberg, sought to make a film this summer that was neither a remake, a reboot, or a sequel (even if the general vibe felt remade). Audiences rewarded the effort, giving Super 8 the top spot of the weekend with around a $37 million weekend. What’s unusual about the opening was that the box office on Saturday night was better than Friday, suggesting a strong word of mouth, although audience scores also show that those under 25 liked it much better than those over 25. That distinction is notable here because the audience with whom Abrams/Spielberg were playing the nostalgia card didn’t care for the film as much as the audience that was coming in new to the Amblin vibe. Will “Mint” be this generation’s “Goonies Never Say Die!”

For such a benign family film, Super 8 was also — from accounts across the Internet — a divisive movie, one that inspired opinions largely on both extremes. There weren’t a lot of “I liked it OK,” opinions, even though that’s precisely what I thought Super 8 warranted. But, many of the people who “liked it OK” expected more Abrams/Spielberg, felt manipulated by the nostalgia, and a little cheated by the marketing campaign. I didn’t experience much of the marketing campaign myself. As I had written earlier, I had anticipated that Super 8 would be the Inception of the summer and avoided all the ads I could, including everything beyond the initial teaser trailer. That Super 8 didn’t live up anywhere near the level of Inception kind of broke my heart.

Of course, according to Rotten Tomatoes, Super 8 scored only four points less than Inception’s 86 percent, which raises the question: Is there a Spielberg bias? Look at the RT ratings of Spielberg’s films this century:

A.I. Artificial Intelligence 73 percent

Catch Me If You Can: 96 percent

Minority Report: 92 percent

The Terminal: 60 percent

Munich: 78 percent

War of the Worlds: 74 percent

Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull: 77 percent


As you can see, there was a massive initial deference toward Spielberg’s Indy IV, and I’m guessing that 65 percent of those critics who gave the film a favorable score are regretting it. I think we can all agree, even those who didn’t care for Super 8, tht it was better than Crystal Skull, and by far more than 5 percent. You can also see that, where Spielberg diverts from his expected subject material (The Terminal) he is not greeted with as much enthusiasm by critics although I found that The Terminal was, to a similar degree, nearly as good as the solid but unexceptional films, Catch Me If You Can and Minority Report. I found all three to be incredibly well made but conservative features, well acted, slick and kind of forgettable (Munich is Spielberg’s best of the last decade, and A.I., another Spielberg film that got the benefit of the doubt from critics, was the second worst, behind Indy IV).

Moving on, X-Men: First Class put up another $25 million this weekend, a decent but spectacular hold. It’ll pass $100 million by the end of today, and is well on its way to $150 - $160 million, good enough to recoup its domestic budget. It’s performing well enough ($124 million) overseas that it’s likely enough there will be a sequel to the prequel. Hangover 2, meanwhile, is holding even better. After its 3rd weekend, it’s now at $216 million overall, good for the biggest money maker of 2011 so far. It may hold that for a few more weeks, until Transformers: Dark of the Moon arrives over the 4th of July holiday.

At four, five, and six were summer mainstays, Kung Fu Panda, Pirates of the Carribean: On Stranger Tides and Bridesmaids, which have hit $126 million, $208 million, and $123 million respectively. In 7th place was the weekend’s other opening, Judy Moody and the NOT Bummer Summer, which bummed out at only $6.2 million.

Six million dollars is bad for Judy Moody, but it was great for Woody Allen’s Midnight in Paris, which added 800 theaters around the country over the weekend. It was also the first Woody Allen film I’d seen in a theater in years (I enjoyed it very much). Now with $14 million, Midnight in Paris has a decent shot at being Allen’s biggest box-office grosser of his career. Tree of Life also continues to roll out very slowly, but so far so good, as Malick’s film added another $18,000 per screen in 47 outlets. Those per screen averages are going to hit a huge tipping point soon, and my guess is that the tipping point will be around 100 theaters. There’s not a lot of enthusiasm for Terrence Malick in Topeka.

And finally, in honor of J.J. Abrams’ Super 8 and its attempt to rekindle Spielberg’s old Amblin magic, I give you Spielberg’s 10 Best Box Office Performances.

10. Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom: $179 million

9. Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade: $197 million

8. Saving Private Ryan: $216 million

7. The Lost World: Jurassic Park: $229 million

6. War of the Worlds: $234 million

5. Raiders of the Lost Ark: $242 million

4. Jaws: $260 million

3. Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull: $317 million

2. Jurassic Park: $357 million

1. E.T. The Extra Terrestrial : $435 million










Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



Pajiba After Dark 6/12/11 | Neil Gaiman's "American Gods" Coming to HBO









Comments

It is sad "Crystal Skull" made the most of the Indys....

Posted by: The Minn at June 13, 2011 1:31 AM

I finally saw X-Men: First Class this weekend, and I have to say: every word of Dustin's review is true, and also, you should see it! Unless it's actually taking food directly out of your children's mouths, it's worth your $6-12 (depending on your locality and preferred movie-going hours).

Fassbender and MacAvoy totally killed. Abso-smurfing-lutely killed. In fact, they were both so awesome that now I can't possibly choose between them, and the only possible option is to be the filling in a Fassbender-MacAvoy sandwich.

Posted by: MM at June 13, 2011 1:50 AM

The homoeriticsm was strong between Mac and Fass in X-Men, nothing wrong with that, best movie of the summer AFTER Fast 5.

"I...I can't feel my legs.." Powerful cinema.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at June 13, 2011 8:03 AM

Eesh, high 90s for The Terminal and Catch Me If You Can? I found both of those to be just flat out mediocre, boring and completely forgettable. RT is so full of crap sometimes.

Posted by: Figgy at June 13, 2011 8:34 AM

I'll keep this short, dull, snark-less, and ineloquent:

I just love Minority Report.

Posted by: penelope at June 13, 2011 8:42 AM

Catch Me If You Can is one of those movies I always watch on tv if it's on. I just like that it's breezy and stylish. I don't think I've ever seen the whole thing but I might like it better that way.

Posted by: Optimus Rhyme at June 13, 2011 8:53 AM

I thought they would be interesting in chronological order:

Jaws (1975): $260 million
Raiders of the Lost Ark (1981): $242 million
E.T. The Extra Terrestrial (1982): 1982 $435 million
Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom(1984): $179 million
Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade (1989): $197 million
Jurassic Park (1993): $357 million
The Lost World: Jurassic Park (1997): $229 million
Saving Private Ryan (1998): $216 million
War of the Worlds (2005): $234 million
Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull (2008): $317 million

Crystal Skull would seem to be the film that gained from Spielberg nostalgia most because it was a very profitable ungodly mess. I thought films like that shot themselves.

Posted by: Mrs. Julien at June 13, 2011 9:44 AM

If only to push Indiana Jones and the [redacted] of the [redacted] [redacted] further down the list:
E.T.: The Extra-Terrestrial: $1.11 billion
Jaws: $1.00 billion
Raiders of the Lost Ark: $693 million
Jurassic Park: $678 million
Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom: $421 million
The Lost World: Jurassic Park: $392 million
Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade: $388 million


Sorry, I love to let my adjusted for inflation flag fly.

Posted by: branded at June 13, 2011 10:16 AM

This is a little more calming. The top movies adjusted for 2011 inflation. Jaws and ET both come in at one billion.

http://boxofficemojo.com/alltime/adjusted.htm

Posted by: TylerDFC at June 13, 2011 10:19 AM

Raiders is still the perfect popcorn movie for me. It's not a great film but it's great fun. I envy the kids who get to see it for the first time. Still the only movie I've ever seen where people stood and applauded during the movie.

Posted by: logan at June 13, 2011 10:27 AM

Thank you branded. I was wondering about that.

Posted by: Mrs. Julien at June 13, 2011 10:29 AM

If people are so scummy nowadays that they would pay to for Shia LePoof and phoning-it-in Harrison Ford, they deserve that type of crappy film.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at June 13, 2011 10:33 AM

I find it hysterical that Woody Allen is regarded as a genius auteur who is given complete creative control even though his films do shit at the box office, while Spike Lee is box office poison who has to be kept on a short leash. Lee's biggest movie, Inside Man did more than double the business of Allen's Hannah and Her Sisters.

Posted by: Tracer Bullet at June 13, 2011 10:44 AM

For Christ's sake, there isn't a conspiracy amongst movie critics. Stephen Spielberg has been savaged by critics before, just look at Hook, to suggest that he's somehow protected when literally everyone involved with movies, even those seen in high regard like Sidney Poitier, Orson Wells, and Morgan Freeman, have been in pieces that have been savaged by critics, and when even Spielberg himself has been savaged by critics, is absurd.

Not to mention, Crystal Skull didn't get great reviews, it got the same critical feedback as Splice,* Bruno,** Kickass, and Revenge of the Sith, movies that some people liked but didn't love, and the rest hated passionately, which is about where Crystal Skull stands.

* Which fucking sucked.

** Fuck that movie.

Posted by: Devil Child at June 13, 2011 11:19 AM

I like what Tracer said. I often do.

Posted by: Mrs. Julien at June 13, 2011 12:29 PM

I can't really agree with your complete assessment of what's going on here, as we differ on our opinion of Spielberg's films of the last decade. Catch Me If You Can is outstanding and deserves every bit of that 96 percent and more. To me, there's really only one completely bad movie on that decade list, and I would say that it's a nostalgic Indiana Jones bias as opposed to a Spielberg-specific bias.

I did think The Terminal was a bit bland, and I have no desire to revisit it, but I didn't have anything against the acting or the direction. I still think War Of The Worlds is about two-thirds of a great film hampered by a horrible ending. A.I. is underrated (and frequently unfairly assessed), Minority Report is very solid (especially if you interpret the ending as hallucination), and Munich is greatness.

Posted by: DarthCorleone at June 13, 2011 3:52 PM

Tracer's point would hold more water if Lee had written Inside Man. To my (little) knowledge, Allen has never directed a film written by someone else. You need to compare apples to apples. How the films are financed/produced also needs to be considered.

Posted by: Three-nineteen at June 13, 2011 3:56 PM

Now to comment on the actual post. After Close Encounters of the Third Kind, anytime a Speilberg movie had children in it there is a twee, sickly sweet component to it that I don't like. So most of Speilberg's movies are overrated to me. Hook was rife with it, but at least that was supposed to be a family movie. I assume that twee, sickly sweet element is also part of Super 8. It seems to me liking/not liking that element is what separates the "loved it!" from the "meh".

Posted by: Three-nineteen at June 13, 2011 4:04 PM

MM and Barb
go clone yourselves
then shoot yourselves
then repeat

Posted by: GM at June 13, 2011 6:55 PM

Obviously this reviewer is of the jaded cynical lot. This movie was fantastic. Yes it had the feel of E.T. and Goonies, because both of those stories focus on the kids, not the "monster". Is it fair to compare another movie to E.T. ever? Hell no! It was made at a different time, a time when kids could still ride bikes all day without coming home and parents didn't worry that they had be "taken". It was at the beginning of all the real special effects movies, it was "our childhood", nothing is ever that good again. Childhood memories are always sacrosanct. I'm ready to go again and again and can't wait for the DVD release!

Posted by: Free Online Astrology at June 13, 2011 10:21 PM

Last comment: best spambot EVAH.

Posted by: Uriah Creep at June 14, 2011 6:07 AM