web
counter
 

Russell Brand Drops a Nearly $40 Million Easter Egg Turd on the Box Office

By Dustin Rowles | Posted Under Box Office Round-Ups | Comments (28)



bilde.jpg

Hooray! Audiences once again reward Russell Brand on his non-stop, Yelling-Across-America tour — it’s funny because he’s British! And British people are cheeky! Post hoc, ergo propter hoc. Ad infinitum. And what child wouldn’t find jelly-bean defecate an entertaining treat? What happens when the Easter Bunny gets the runs, anyway? You get some kind of rainbow river of sludge?

Anyway, Hop now holds the highest-grossing opening weekend of 2011. Thanks, America. Keep encouraging ‘em! That’s the spirit! Next up? Animated, talking turds and their thrilling and dangerous journey through the NYC sewer system.

Meanwhile, Source Code quietly put up a respectable $15 million, good for second place, and enough to keep Duncan Jones’ name bouncing around better sci-fi projects for a few years (not that Source Code is bad — just very conservative). And for anyone that paid to see Source Code, the voice cameo was nearly worth the price of admission itself. Right? Right? Don’t leave me hanging here. And while that gross is good for Duncan Jones, it’s probably not that great for Jake Gyllenhaal, as he’s proven again that he’s not yet capable of carrying his own film. Look at this guy’s box-office record. People really just don’t care about Gyllenhaal.

Elsewhere, Insidious managed an OK $13.5 million, despite one of the worst marketing campaigns in recent memory. “Insidious is … ” Oh, Jump Up My Ass. Feedback in our own comments section was poor, indicating that it didn’t even a get much jump-scare comedic value in theaters that weren’t packed to the rafters with drunks. Audience means everything for this kind of horror movie, and if you can’t pack the theater with squealers, it’s hardly worth the effort unless the movie stands up on its own (and Insidious decidedly does not). If only Patrick Wilson had lost another testicle in this one, it might have squeezed out another $1 million.

Limitless and The Lincoln Lawyer, meanwhile, continue to have impressive box-office legs, landing in 5th and 6th with cumulative grosses of $55 million and $40 million, respectively. Not bad for films that rely more on story than special effects.

Oh, and Sucker Punch? That dropped a whopping 68 percent, fetching only $6 million in its second weekend, well on its way to around a $45 million overall box office (on an $82 million production budget, and probably $50 million in marketing). So far, even foreign grosses have been lackluster, so expect Sucker Punch to land in the red, an ominous launching pad into the Superman reboot for Zack Snyder.

In great news, the re-release of the edited The King’s Speech as a PG-13 film failed spectacularly, managing only $1.1 million. How dumb was the Weinstein move there? How many more 13-17 year old did they really expect to attract with a prestige movie about a a stuttering monarch? You see a lot of Twilight and Fast and Furious pouting because they couldn’t get into The King’s Speech without their parents. Jesus, if you are 13-17 years old and want to see The King’s Speech, most parents I’d imagine would be happy to take you to see the R-rated version. Good parents, anyway.

In sadder news, the limited release of James Gunn’s Super, with Rainn Wilson and Ellen Page, barely made a blip in 11 theaters, managing just $4,800 per screen, enough to get it into a few more theaters, but not likely to merit a wider platform release.










Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



The Wee Free Men by Terry Pratchett | Everything Must Go Trailer: The Return of Stranger than Fiction Will Ferrell









Comments

So you're saying the Easter Bunny dropped a deuce on us?

Posted by: Mrs. Julien at April 4, 2011 9:23 AM

My mother was begging me to let her take my son to see Hop. He's TWO. She's an idiot.

Posted by: Kolby at April 4, 2011 9:29 AM

Somehow I missed the news of that PG-13 release. That is ridiculous.

Posted by: KatSings at April 4, 2011 9:30 AM

"What happens when the Easter Bunny gets the runs, anyway? You get some kind of rainbow river of sludge?"

I think that, despite the desire to increase human knowledge by rational inquiry, there are some questions that should not be asked. Unless, of course, one is a coprophile.

Will there be a Web-based sequel titled Two Rabbits, One Egg?

Posted by: The Wanderer at April 4, 2011 9:30 AM

Come on, take it easy. Hop is directed at kids anyway, and how often do we get an Easter-related movie? My mom took my 3 year old to see it and they had a great time. My daughter was dancing and laughing, so eff your selfish ideas about what kind of entertainment value a G-rated movie should have for a mid-30's-aged movie-obsessed feminist who forgets what it's like to actually believe that a talking rabbit could really exist and that you might meet and hang out and maybe, just maybe, that little fucker might leave a big pile of jelly beans for mom and dad to eat because EATING SHIT IS FUNNY GODDAMNIT!!!!!

Posted by: Kballs at April 4, 2011 9:39 AM

But....but that bunny is so cute! Hell, if I were a 4 year old I'd pull a tantrum til my mom bought me a stuffed bunny. And if it pooped jellybeans? GENIUS marketing right there.

I wonder if it would have been less of a giant turd if it had been fully animated. Mixing CGI and live action just never works.

Posted by: Figgy at April 4, 2011 9:50 AM

"What happens when the Easter Bunny gets the runs, anyway? You get some kind of rainbow river of sludge?"

The contents are taken and molded into fruit roll-ups.

Posted by: PissBoy at April 4, 2011 9:52 AM

KBalls and Pissboy tie for the EE.

Posted by: The Wanderer at April 4, 2011 9:56 AM

Two coprophilia mentions in 4 days? Oh Pajiba, you had me at sh*t.

At 9:52 am, PissBoy put EE in headlock and choked it till it passed out.

Posted by: Mrs. Julien at April 4, 2011 9:59 AM

Every year, we put a trail of chocolate-covered raisins behind Little Julien's Easter bunny. There's a special magic in hearing a small child announcing he is eating Easter Bunny poop.

As parents, you do what you have to to get through your day.

Posted by: Mrs. Julien at April 4, 2011 10:02 AM

Mrs. Julien,
Don't be surprised when you find the little one eating REAL animal shit in the yard thinking it will taste like raisins, then blaming you for tricking him into cleaning feces out of the yard with his mouth.

Posted by: Kballs at April 4, 2011 10:11 AM

If he thinks he is getting chocolate-covered raisins, why would he blame me? He'll think I'm the best mum ever!

Posted by: Mrs. Julien at April 4, 2011 10:13 AM

I was dragged to see Hop with my wife and the kids she used to nanny for (5,8,10). They loved it. It was like a buzz of constant giggles.

If I had been forced to go see it alone or with other adults I would've felt that my money were wasted. It wasn't very good. But with kids there, and with the knowledge that we were all there for the kids -- I really enjoyed it. It was fun watching them have fun, and in that context the movie was actually pretty enjoyable.

Posted by: superasente at April 4, 2011 10:15 AM

I almost feel obligated to see Insidious, but even the good reviews let me know there is nothing in there that will please me. I think I'll just rewatch Dead Silence and pretend it's a new release.

Posted by: Robert at April 4, 2011 10:19 AM

Mrs. Julien,
You don't think your kid will notice the taste difference between real shit (that you've convinced him is edible and delicious) and chocolate-covered raisins? This information will undoubtedly make Sunmaid executives furious with their taste-testers for approving shit-flavored candy for mass distribution.

Posted by: Kballs at April 4, 2011 10:32 AM

On Saturday, I played Monopoly with the 5 year old Julien. He landed on Free Parking. As he gathered up his money he said,

I could buy God if He was in the store!

It's completely irrelevant to the poop discussion, but I had no comeback for Kballs, other than pointing out that being a raisin taste-tester sounds like a punishment for 6 year olds.

Posted by: Mrs. Julien at April 4, 2011 10:53 AM

Oh gods, did I start a trend? That's not the trend I would have wanted to start! It was a moment of comedic weakness!

I think I'd better go polish my sword so I can fall on it.

Posted by: Wintermute at April 4, 2011 11:01 AM

when my daughter was five, her very favorite thing was a little plastic dog you could feed little pellets to, and then make him poop them out.

no one ever really outgrows poop jokes. it's why this sight delighted in the revulsion of the human centipede for so very long.

i'm with kballs and superasente here in remaining really exhausted with the constant ragging on kids movies for being kids movies and not mumblecore or haute cinema. it's not just a shortage of imagination or perspective on the notion of there being different kinds of movies with different purposes, it's downright narcissistic.

Posted by: idleprimate at April 4, 2011 11:52 AM

will probably make it up in Japan.

I mean, a sword-wielding blonde in a sailor outfit fighting giant robots.

If that isn't the most common wet-dream in Japan...

Posted by: Wembley at April 4, 2011 11:54 AM

According to Gunn's site, I'll be waiting for Super until May 5. And I'll have to drive to Louisville for it.

Which, okay, isn't horrible -- it's only about an hour from Lexington. But still! I want to give you clams, Super, but staggered distribution demands another month of patience. Boo-lame.

Posted by: sardonicynic at April 4, 2011 11:57 AM

Way to go Wembley. You just broke the internet.

Posted by: Kballs at April 4, 2011 11:59 AM

Mixing CGI and live action just never works.

Posted by: Figgy at April 4, 2011 9:50 AM
---
Um, there was a pretty damn good one also about a talking rabbit (and I don't mean "Space Balls"). Come on, figgy, I'm betting you know the one ... I'm framing it for you pretty well ... Roger, over and out.

Posted by: , at April 4, 2011 12:09 PM

I wanted to see Super too, but it's not playing anywhere near me.

Posted by: fracas at April 4, 2011 12:26 PM

To be fair, this movie had one of the most AGGRESSIVE ad campaigns I've seen in awhile. These ads showed up on Every single channel and at all hours. There were multiple interactive HOP campaigns including NBC's Thursday night line-up. Interactive HOP ads showed up while I was watching Bravo...who were they for??? I went to see Insidious this weekend and there was a stampede of kids there for Hop. Impressive, even for a kid's movie.

Posted by: valerie at April 4, 2011 1:07 PM

Insidious only cost 1.5 million

Posted by: ok at April 4, 2011 1:14 PM

Roger Rabbit was like 500 years ago, ,! It doesn't even count.

Posted by: Figgy at April 4, 2011 7:03 PM

ok,Come on, take it easy. Hop is directed at kids anyway, and how often do we get an Easter-related movie? My mom took my 3 year old to see it and they had a great time. My daughter was dancing and laughing, so eff your selfish ideas about what kind of entertainment value a G-rated movie should have for a mid-30's-aged movie-obsessed feminist who forgets what it's like to actually believe that a talking rabbit could really exist and that you might mee

Posted by: cosplay costumes at April 5, 2011 5:25 AM

@ok

Actually, Insidious was made for $800,000, while Source Code was made for around $32 million. So Insidious is considered a success.

Posted by: pkittie at April 5, 2011 3:34 PM