free counter with statistics King Dork by Frank Portman | Pajiba - Scathing Reviews for Bitchy People

51DRWKEHM9L._SS500_.jpg
King Dork by Frank Portman


Cannonball Read / Mike R. (Dr. Controversy)

Box Office Round-Ups | September 4, 2009 | Comments (19)


I forget how, but somehow I stumbled on the title King Dork on Pajiba and decided it was at least worth a shot (might’ve been my 47,000 recommendations. — DR). Before reading it though, I told myself I had to read The Catcher in the Rye. I’m glad I did, because knowledge of The Catcher in the Rye is definitely something you’re going to want when reading this book. It is referenced, mocked, paralleled, and eventually vindicated, depending on how you look at it.

The story of King Dork, much like Catcher, focuses on a teenage boy who thinks he’s above the norm and can see past the veil of normalcy. Thomas Henderson (aka, Chi-Mo) lost his father at an early age, due to a car accident. His mother is a bit spacy, his step father is out of touch, and his sister is a queen bitch in training. His main coping mechanism with life as a teenage outcast? Musical endeavours with his best friend, Sam. Their high school lives are nothing more than dodging bullies, ogling girls, questioning creepy academic professionals, and changing their band name about every two weeks or so.

As if Thomas’s life couldn’t get any more mixed up, he becomes involved in two quests that may or may not be intertwined. The first is an effort to track down this girl, Fiona, whom he made out with at a party. The second is to decode some sort of coded message system scattered through his father’s teenage library, which happens to contain a copy of Catcher in the Rye. The main weight of the book is within these quests, but some of the load is also carried by Tom’s ever evolving interactions with his own family. This book, at least from the pull quotes in the back, seems to be trying to set itself apart from “the Catcher Cult,” but in fact it aligns itself ever so perfectly as a successor to its throne.

This book reads as if it were “Catcher 2.0”, and like it or not Thomas Henderson is the new Holden Caufield; Suburbia is just as soul crushingly lonely as New York; and instead of missing a brother, he misses his father. The music’s changed, but the tune is very similar. It’s not that King Dork is a bad book (I will cut you. — DR), it’s actually entertaining and pretty funny at times. It’s just that it’s hard to identify with the protagonist, who sometimes comes off as a little too Juno-esque for his own good (You’re killing me! — DR). Also, he uses acronyms a little too much, which makes it easy to find yourself flipping back a couple pages to try and decipher what the hell he’s talking about (There’s a glossary at the end of the book. —DR). Which, one would think, is a good way of separating the two factions of the audience: teenagers who read this and the parents who are trying to understand them. You either get it, and you eat a book like this up over the course of a couple days (Yes! — DR) …or you don’t, and you wade through it for a couple months (Boo! — DR). (Or, more applicable in this case, you fall smack dab in the middle and you take a couple weeks.)

Then, of course, there’s the central mystery of Thomas’s father. It has a decent build up, decent followthrough, but in the end it just muddles itself into obscurity. Which is a shame, because it starts to ramp back up towards the end of the book, after being dropped a little in the middle section. That ramp up, however, leads to nothing. It should be noted that this is Portman’s first book, but that’s still not a complete excuse for what could have happened here. On the “First Book” spectrum, it’s smack dab in the middle of the best (Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s Stone) and the worst (Twilight). It’s mildly entertaining, and I’d highly recommend it for teenagers. Parents, on the other hand, just won’t understand (Hey! I’m a parent! — DR)

And now, in honor of King Dork, I’d like to share some punk band names that I’ve created myself:

- Crock Pot Abortion (thanks to Revolutionary Road)
- Marshmallow FUCK! (a yell of frustration while shopping for s’mores supplies)
- Muppet Death Threat (a thought that occured one day after thinking about Elmo)
- Sister Mary Francis and the Cocksucking Extravaganza (special thanks to my brother Nick for the second part of the name)

This review is part of the Cannonball Read series. Details about here and the growing number of participants and their blogs, from which these reviews are pulled, are here. And check here for more of Mike R.’s reviews.


Airplane Movies | Mike White Enlightened



Comments

Mt band name..."Red Vag of Courage"...

Posted by: Diablo at September 4, 2009 8:50 AM

Nice review Doc. Can't say as though this one would interest me - sounds too young adulty.

Band names:

Brought To You By The Letter F

Twisted Twat

Blue Saliva

Posted by: Cindy at September 4, 2009 9:09 AM

hey, I just read this too! I really enjoyed it. It's been a long time since I read Catcher, so I'd like to re-read that and then re-read this, because I'm sure there's specific allusions that I missed (I've got a brain full of holes), but it definitely has a very similar vibe (though I think many people's complaint about an unlikeable protag would probably not happen with this one). There were some really fantastic lines here and there (I loved, "Sometimes it's hard to tell fake hippie from goth, I've found"), and I liked the acronym thing, though I did have to flip back to remember a couple. But, in reality, if I'm writing in a journal/diary type deal, I'm using shorthand, so I liked that touch. I also appreciated that the father mystery wasn't really cleared up, but I'm the type to not mind if everything isn't wrapped up neatly with a little bow on top. Sometimes mysteries are just not meant to be solved. And, without knowing, Chi just has to move on and learn to accept the life he has. The only part I'm not sure how I felt about was the subplot with the assistant principal. I'm not sure it was necessary, and it seemed a little like reaching. But maybe not. This is why I like to read things twice, and as I said, I've only had a chance to read this once.

Anyway. I liked it. Recommended. And, wow, I've never seen so many comments from DR in a review before...

Posted by: Anna von Beaverplatz at September 4, 2009 9:10 AM

Diablo just made me snort tea all over my keyboard.

Posted by: BWeaves at September 4, 2009 9:45 AM

I just have to say, I feel honored to be served by you Mr. Rowles. Yes sir, may I have another sir? (And by "parents" I mean more along the likes of traditional "squares". You're no LBT, so of course you had no problem digging the scene.

Posted by: Doctor Controversy at September 4, 2009 10:11 AM

Great review Mike! I read this last year and thought it was the tits.

Posted by: Julie at September 4, 2009 11:07 AM

It's on my list to read.

Band name:
Oh My God! it's BLASPHEMY

Posted by: Kel at September 4, 2009 11:35 AM

AvB, while I too love ambiguous endings, this had the biggest carrot dangler of them all. The build up with the Asst. Principal as an adversary, then the revelation and speculation of his proclivities was too great not to resolve. I just saw all these fragments that looked like they were going to come together in the end, but then it just blue balls you out of that last piece of the puzzle. Mamma Mia did that shit too, and I hated it it then as well.

Cindy, it is very young adulty. However, I think it'd be awesome if school started doing compare and contrast readings of this and Catcher in their curriculum. It'd train their literary eye, and it'd help turn them into future Pajibites. (Like Glenn Beck said, you gotta get 'em when they're young. Boy, I do hate that man.)

Posted by: Doctor Controversy at September 4, 2009 11:52 AM

This book sounds like it's right up my alley. I adore coming-of-age novels, and this one sounds smart and funny and poignant. Sign me up!

I wonder if our town's little podunk library has this book? Doubt it, but we'll give it a go.

Posted by: lucy at September 4, 2009 1:26 PM

I adored this book. It took me two months to read it because I didn't want to finish it. Ever. This book is BRILLIANT and I was excited to see it reviewed here. Even if I don't agree with the review.

Posted by: Sofía at September 4, 2009 1:28 PM

Free Lola Montes! Now that I have a band name I just need a band. Off to shine up my accordion. Can anyone here play the spoons?

Posted by: Michin at September 4, 2009 2:05 PM

loved this book -- reminiscent of special topics in calamity physics. smart broken teenage protagonists with parental issues and sicko twisted mysteries. read them both! then read secret history. just because.

Posted by: melia at September 4, 2009 2:22 PM

ooh, melia, I picked up Special Topics but haven't gotten to it yet. Is it good? I'm excited for it. I'll probably save it for the Cannonball Read, though.

Posted by: Anna von Beaverplatz at September 4, 2009 3:13 PM

God, Dustin, why are you the perfect person?

Posted by: coveredinbees at September 4, 2009 4:32 PM

Special Topics is GREAT. Also, if you're a lit nerd, you get to smirk your way all through it because you get all the references she's desperately throwing at.

and, P.S. re: the Junoesque comment in the review, this book predates Juno by, what two years? That kills me.

Posted by: coveredinbees at September 4, 2009 4:35 PM

A garage punk band called Beercan Revival

Priest Bonham Red on guitar and fuzzy ladies.

Sammy 'Beaux Arts' Ritard on bass and econometrics.

Logan the Ox on skins, buckets and chime-a-wares.

first album, It Ain't Cristal, Clearly

Posted by: Jackseppelin at September 4, 2009 5:36 PM

Punk Band Name - "Creepy Uncle"

Cover Band Name - "Just Another Bar Band"

But only because it would make so many bad puns in review titles.

Amateurs go for the big, dramatic doom, but it's the small cruelties that count, the incidental ones, casual and almost unnoticed that cut the deepest. Because they are so ... unnecessary. (God I just went to the Cenobite place for a minute there. Why are they in my head? Did I forget to sacrifice a(n inflatable) goat this week?)

And now you can't get a series of bad band review titles out of your mind. One after another, they pop up. Not a plastic surgery centipede, maybe, but lots of little mental paper cuts.

My work here is done.

Posted by: BierceAmbrose at September 4, 2009 9:22 PM

You might note that the author of this book is the frontman for a band called The Mr. T Experience.

And they rule.

Posted by: Tim Jones at September 5, 2009 12:06 AM

I forget how, but somehow I stumbled on the title King Dork on Pajiba and decided it was at least worth a shot (might’ve been my 47,000 recommendations. — DR). Before reading it though, I told myself I had to read The Catcher in the Rye. I’m glad I did, because knowledge of The Catcher in the Rye is definitely something you’re going to want when reading this book. It is referenced, mocked, paralleled, and eventually vindicated, depending on how you look at it.

This is exactly what the opening paragraph of my CR review for this book would have looked like, if I had ever gotten around to a review.

I mostly agree with everything, in particular about the unresolved ending with the dad. I do appreciate that some punk kid didn't (SPOILER) solve a decades-old murder from a couple of notes in a book, but the way it played out felt so unsatisfying. Also, as a girl who was more in the position of the friendly, ignored fat girl than any other character in the novel, the way all of his female relationships developed annoyed me. It's like, wish fulfillment from a guy in a band with a funny name about being in a band with a funny name.

Posted by: SaBrina at September 6, 2009 2:38 AM