web
counter
 

It's Not Just that Hollywood Makes Crappy Movies, It's That Audiences Love Crappy Movies

By Dustin Rowles | Posted Under Box Office Round-Ups | Comments (20)



life_as_we_know_it_ver2.jpg

Here’s a statistic that will surprise no one: The weekend’s number two film, Life As We Know It, both scored an A- with audiences on Cinemascore, and scored in the 90s with test audiences before it was released. Meanwhile, it fared well with around 29 percent of movie critics, according to RottenTomatoes.

Critics don’t like to believe that we’re more eclectic than mainstream audiences. Cinemablend wrote a nice piece the other day about 10 Common Misconptions that movie blog readers have, and one entry was the misconception that film critics always hate what’s popular. They did a nice job disproving that notion overall (nine of the top ten movies of all time also scored well with critics), except for this one sentence: “It’s not that film critics set out to like what’s popular or hate what’s popular, in general they simply like what’s good and hate what isn’t. Most of the time, so do you.”

The last sentence is not necessarily true. Sure, it’s true for most of our readers, and it’s true for the majority of people that bother to read reviews, but the majority of people — the people that talk loudly on the cell phone on the subway, the guy who cut you off the other day, and the people that bring their 3 year olds to R-Rated movies — don’t really like what’s good, or at least what I think is good. They like the crap that studios make. Or at least what we think is crap. They like “Mike & Molly,” and “Two and a Half Men,” and Michael Bay and Life As We Know It. The people I grew up with, those that we’re always suggesting that they read reviews so they can do the opposite of what the critic says: They do it because that’s what works for them. And who the hell am I to judge? Or any critic, for that matter. If they watched all the movies that I thought were great, they’d probably be unhappy moviegoers. To say what I like is good, and that the formulaic, predictable, high-concept studio star vehicles is bad is a matter of taste. They think I like crappy movies, and I think they like crappy movies, and the only thing we can all seem to agree upon is that Ghostbusters is the tits. The end.

In sum: If you want to be happy, if you want the movies you like to succeed at the box office, then stop reading so much. Stop expecting so much. Stop being so critical all the time. Stop caring about quality or creativity or inventiveness. Turn your fucking brains off and smile when Katherine Heigl smiles and laugh when Ashton Kutcher laughs and cry when Robin Williams dresses up like a goddamn clown and helps children with cancer. You high-fallutin motherfuckers; step off your high-horse and open your mind to the possibility that Michael Bay is the greatest thing to ever happen to cinema, you elitist assholes. Don’t try to change the product; change your perception of the product.

Let’s all be dumb.

Life As We Know It debuted at number two this weekend, scoring around $14.5 million. The Social Network held on to 40 percent of its audience (the highest hold percentage of any number one movie released this year) to take the top spot with $15.5 million. Secretariat — which scored an A with Cinemascore audiences — made $12.6 million to land at number three. The weekend’s other new entry, My Soul to Take debuted at number five with almost $6 million.

Meanwhile, It’s Kind of a Funny Story, which opened in 750 theaters and made around $2 million, and Buried, which opened in 92 theaters and made $200,000, totally shit the box-office bed. Serves them right for not appealing to mainstream audiences. Go shit in your hat “indie theater.”










Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



Pajiba After Dark 10/10/10 | The Five Best Columbus Day Films









Comments

I Spit on Your Grave opened in 12 theaters and made $33,000. You should be happy, Mr. Rowles.

Posted by: Groot at October 10, 2010 10:14 PM

It was number two because it was the newest option for couples with name people in it. Since people go to movies not caring what the critics think, name recognition triumphs.

Posted by: mb at October 10, 2010 10:34 PM

You Have To Be A Certain Kind Of Person To Review A Certain Kind Of Movie

They put it down as a misconception, but I hold that to a certain degree it's true. I know that on this site I always groan when I see that Carlson got the review for a movie that I'm looking forward to, as he invariably gives bad reviews to the movies that I love (see Scott Pilgrim, which I hold to be the best movie since Shaun of the Dead). Perhaps generalizing to say "a certain kind of person" is wrong, but sometimes a movie is made for a specific audience, and people outside that audience aren't necessarily going to like/understand the style and humor.

Note: I'm not saying that Daniel Carlson is a bad reviewer, just that sometimes when I see his name pop up I wish it was TK or SLW instead.

Posted by: Chugga at October 10, 2010 10:38 PM

Not surprised. Nor will I be when it drops to #5 next week when Jackass 3D and RED come out.

Posted by: Fredo at October 11, 2010 12:31 AM

A sweet young couple dying a horrible death and orphaning their child so Rainbow Killer and some douchebag can torture us for two hours doesn't seem like a good "date movie". I really thought this one would tank. Never underestimate the power of name-recognition.

Posted by: Jennifer at October 11, 2010 12:56 AM

I'm confused though, because, name recognition? For those two? Really? I had this idea in my head that Heigl wasn't exactly Box Office Gold, though I could be wrong about that. But haven't her previous 5 movies or whatever done horribly? Plus she's not even on Grey's Anatomy anymore. And the only thing I know about Josh Duhamel is that he's Fergie's husband.

I think it's more what someone pointed out up there: couples had nothing better to do, and it's the only one that seems appealing as a 'date' movie to the sort of people (and the sort of couples) that Dustin talked about in the article.

Posted by: figgy at October 11, 2010 6:43 AM

studios praise avatar because they think it is "amazing" and "perfect". but really, 20th century fox said that because it financed practically every flop theyve ever had, and will continue to do so until the end of time. the critics with brains, didnt like avatar, simply because it was shit, not because it made 2.3 billion dollars. in my opinion, its one of the biggest exploitations of stupid people, who go to movies like avatar and expect "to have their minds blown". i went in with low expectations, and i came out ranting and screaming how bad it was. critics dont hate all blockbusters, but the fact remains that the really terible ones (michael bay films in general)do incredible things at the box office. i guess what im trying to say is
1. avatar is shit, james cameron is no longer the king, suckit bitch
2. critics( for the most part, not including armond white) are pretty intelligent people, they dont hate because they want to make your movie-going-experience terrible, get the fuck over it

Posted by: Taylor Kozakar at October 11, 2010 7:57 AM

All you have to do is mention Tyler Perry and you've won the argument.

Posted by: protoguy at October 11, 2010 8:58 AM

The closest thing I could compare Avatar to is an incredibly hot chick with down sydrome

Posted by: jared at October 11, 2010 9:19 AM

Okay, I'm putting a toe in the water here, but since I am older than most of you I really have to know:

"It may be that couples had nothing better to do"?????????????

My God! I'm wait-listed for Shady Pines and I could have found several better things to do with Mr. PaddyDog this weekend if there was even the remotest threat of seeing this film.

Figgy: you aren't even married a year. You shouldn't be backing up this excuse.

Posted by: PaddyDog at October 11, 2010 9:28 AM

PaddyDog, I agree. Wife and I had nothing to do this weekend, so we went to breakfast, took naps, went for a long walk, tidied up the house a little, watched SNL, prepared the ingredients for tonight's chicken soup (and danced around the kitchen) and eventually went to bed early. I even managed to mow the lawn, burn some DVDs and to work in an hour of video games in the in-betweens.

And at no point -- AT NO POINT -- was I like, "Hey, wanna go see Jackass 3 with Katherine Heigl?" We just don't get that bored.

Posted by: superasente at October 11, 2010 9:46 AM

I'm with Superasante:

"Look, honey! '60 Minutes' is on!"
---
So, this means there's no way in hell "Buried" is coming anywhere near my town.*

*--makes note to self to take NetFlix up on its "first month free" offer.

Posted by: , at October 11, 2010 10:23 AM

eventually went to bed early

An accidental moment become the right moment?

---------------

While single, I don't buy the "couples were bored" excuse. People go see what catches their attention and they think they will like.

And let's not act like we don't like some really stupid stuff. It's just it usually serves some other purpose -- like taking a lady to see the latest Statham classic for the purpose of getting her hormone levels all the way to the red and ensuring a good end to the date!

Posted by: Fredo at October 11, 2010 10:58 AM

I get the impression that a lot of movie goers go to see movies ritualistically and this is why ridiculous movies get high box office returns.

"It's friday night, friday night is movie night, lets pick a movie. Life As We Know It is new, havent seen that one."

"I dunno, Bill. Looks like a stupid romantic comedy"

"Yea, but we saw Social Network last week, we don't have kids so Secretariat is out and I'm not really feeling in the mood for yet another slasher flick after seeing Hatchet II. Unfortunately, we live in suburbia hell and there isn't a theater for 100 miles thats showing Buried"

"But, it looks shit balls retarded, Bill"

"Yea, but its Friday and we always go to the movies on Friday. Lets just suck it up, nom some popcorn and giggle at the absurdity."

Posted by: Lennon at October 11, 2010 11:45 AM

The masses love shit. Plain and simple. Need we refer back to the top 20 rated TV shows? 20 million people enjoy Dancing With the Stars. Only 3 million of those stop watching when #3 ranked DWTS: Results comes on.

Snookie-loompa has a book deal.

"The Situation" is a millionaire.

Rainbow killer does well at the box office.

The apocalypse is going to be sweet and welcomed.

Posted by: PaulterA at October 11, 2010 12:20 PM

Yeah, but NONE of that trash is anything we have to pay $10/person for (plus snacks).

Posted by: superasente at October 11, 2010 12:53 PM

I'm with Chugga on this one. Certain movies will never be liked by certain people no matter how well that certain movie is made. Certainly.

Posted by: Littlejon2001 at October 11, 2010 3:45 PM

My boss and his wife see every boring stupid fecking idiot movie that comes out. Then they tell us all about them on Monday. I want to kill my boss on Mondays.

Does no one stay home and have sex anymore?

Caveat: The weekend the real Jackass 3-D comes out, ALL BETS ARE OFF!!

Posted by: kingonfree at October 12, 2010 1:25 PM

Well good for you guys, but come on. We're not all perfect lovey doveys, and some people are just idiots. You think women are going to watch this thing alone? Bitch, please.

People are stupid, you guys. That means COUPLES will be stupid. And that means stupid couples will go watch this movie.

I love how you all took "couples" to mean "all couples" in my statement.

Posted by: figgy at October 15, 2010 5:43 AM

Wait, you're not even gonna look at WHY the opinions might differ between critics and audiences? Like the fact that critics look for original stories, because formulas get boring if you watch like 50 movies a year? Or WHY people might find enjoyment in shallow or stupid movies? Stating that "everyone is different" is avoiding the question.

And what's up with this summary? All that swearing, and telling us to just shut up and take our medicine- What's that achieve? I'd comment on some of the arguments you presented, but... there are none.

Oh and lol at the "We don't like these movies because we're smart- but everyone else is stupid, and we just got to live with it." Superior much? Fuck man...

Posted by: Mike at October 22, 2010 9:27 AM