web
counter
 

Hollywood's 10 Most Overpaid Actors

By Dustin Rowles | Posted Under Box Office Round-Ups | Comments (14)



drew-barrymore8.jpg

Thanks to the smallest non-holiday drop of all time for a wide release (a weensy 3 percent), Dreamworks Puss in Boots held on to the top spot at the weekend box office, making an impressive $33.4 million in its second weekend. The reasons for the small drop are in part due to the fact that many families didn’t make it out last weekend to see it because of Halloween and because of the snow storm in the Northeast, but also because of positive word of mouth, which is miraculously still a thing in a day and age where marketing usually shouts down any word of mouth, either positive or negative. The film has totaled $75 million so far, well on its way to $150 million or so.

Douche Ratner’s Tower Heist didn’t exactly benefit from his remarks about Olivia Munn, as the Eddie Murphy film managed a modest $25 million for second place this weekend, which in on par (ish) with openings for other Ben Stiller comedies. The film, surprisingly, received a B from Cinemascore (that’s not very good, given Cinemascore audience’s typical effusiveness).

Speaking of Eddie Murphy, he landed in second place in this year’s Forbes’ list of the most overpaid actors Hollywood. Murphy’s last three films made only $2.70 for every dollar that’s spent on Murphy, keeping in mind, however, that Forbes list does not include animated films in its calculations, reasoning that audiences don’t go for celebrity voices, which is at least debatable.

The list was topped by Drew Barrymore, although I’m skeptical of their reasons behind not including She’s Just Not That Into You among her counted films, reasoning that she wasn’t the draw (though, as I recall, she was an executive producer). They did, however, include Everybody’s Fine, which was a DeNiro film with a supporting role from Barrymore. Curious.

Here’s the most overpaid actors, and the return on investment per dollar.

1. Drew Barrymore: $0.40

2. Eddie Murphy: $2.70

3. Will Ferrell: $3.50

4. Reese Witherspoon: $3.55

5. Denzel Washington: $4.25

6. Nicolas Cage: $4.40

7. Adam Sandler: $5.20

8. Vince Vaughn: $5.20

9. Tom Cruise: $6.35

10. Nicole Kidman: $6.70

(Source: Forbes)

It’s kind of odd to call most of these actor “overpaid.” If I knew I’d get a $5 return on my $1 investment, I’d surely make that bet, even accounting for other costs. So if Tom Cruise makes $20 million per picture, then his movies make over $120 million. That’s not bad. Not bad at all. That’s particularly true if worldwide grosses are not accounted for, which is my assumption since Tom Cruise’s last two films both made over $200 million worldwide and he would’ve had to have been paid $36 million per picture for those figures to work out correctly for his last three films (which are all that are counted).

Anyway, Kal Penn and John Cho are not on that list nor is Neil Patrick Harris, but their latest, A Very Harold & Kumar 3D Christmas opened poorly with $13 million, despite the 3D screenings. It had a similarly bad B Cinemascore. Given the lack of Christmas-themed offerings this season (Arthur Christmas is the only other), I suspect it’ll stick around in the top 10 for a few week, all the same.

Paranormal Activity landed at number four in its third weekend, accumulating $95 million so far (it likely will not top the $107 million of the first film), while In Time continues to perform weakly, generating only $7.7 million in its second week.










Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



The Innkeepers Trailer: You Can Check In Anytime You Like, But You Can Never Leave | We Need To Talk About Kevin Trailer: I'd Like To Thank You For Preying On My Darkest Fear









Comments

Saw PA3 the other night.

Fucking jump-out scares are the worst,cheapest device any filmmaker can use. The reason the first one was good? Minimal jump-outs, maximum creepiness. This one? The opposite. And it's infuriating, mostly because it gets me every fucking time.

Fuck, now I'm pissed AND thinking about ghosts. It's gonna be a tough nightmare session tonight.

Posted by: ChristianH at November 6, 2011 11:40 PM

Your logic there would make more sense if an actor's salary was the entire budget for a film. If they're paying Cruise $20m for a film, the budget and marketing for that film is probably north of $150m.

Adam Sandler, on the other hand, gets the big bucks himself but the overall budgets for his films generally aren't TOO extravagant.

Posted by: Arran at November 6, 2011 11:47 PM

The notion of Nicolas Cage being paid in real life human dollars does not sit well with me. He should be being paid in pyramids and manna and Vishnu's tears.

Posted by: zeke the pig at November 7, 2011 9:38 AM

Actors and professional "athletes" (read: crybabies). There is ju$t $o much wrong with the equa$ion.

Posted by: klingonfree at November 7, 2011 9:55 AM

Hey I get to put another dollar in my "actress on her hands and knees, with her ass up in the air" jar, woohoo!

Posted by: John W at November 7, 2011 10:56 AM

John W.

You've noticed the prevalence of the doggie-style pose these days too, I see.

"Tower Heist" wasn't bad. It has its funny bits, and Mrs. , said she hadn't laughed that hard in years (she apparently forgets she saw "Bridesmaids" this year). She said she usually can't stand Ben Stiller and it helped a lot that he played his part pretty much straight. I thought the tone was kind of all over the place. Which means I kind of fall in line with the review here. It was ... OK. I've seen funnier, and I've seen worse.

Posted by: , at November 7, 2011 11:29 AM

I need clarification:

Is the header picture sexy? It looks like they took several elements that are supposed to be sexy and put them in a sexalicious blender and came out with something that is trying too hard. But I'm not the target demographic. Is it sexy? Is it sexy in spite of itself?

Posted by: Mrs. Julien at November 7, 2011 11:48 AM

It's sexy until you realize it's Drew Barrymore.

Posted by: logan at November 7, 2011 1:00 PM

Is the header picture sexy?

Not really, Mrs. J. The problem is you're stuck there, over the top so to speak. It gets worse the longer you linger.

I can think of 13 vignettes in which that picture would rock as a snap of a tasty and appreciated moment of "trying too hard" in the midst of a larger, longer, very sexy something something. Sometimes too much is too much, but way too much is just right.

That picture on its own is just tacky.

MHO.

Posted by: BierceAmbrose at November 7, 2011 2:40 PM

I don't know if it's objectively sexy, but it really does nothing for me.

Posted by: Ghisent at November 7, 2011 3:46 PM

I think the 17-inch heels push it over the top.

I've made this complaint before, but there are still few things, if anything, sexier on a woman than a come-on smile. That header pic we had up of ScarJo the other day, where her smile is just thisclose to a smirk? Something more like that. She can be wearing anything, or nothing, doesn't matter so much.

Posted by: , at November 7, 2011 3:53 PM

Maybe what I really meant (and I can't believe I'm saying this), the doggy-style pose is becoming so cliche it's ...

(whispers)

... boring. That goes for the just-stepped-out-of-the-sauna look too.

Time for sexy smiles to make a comeback.

Posted by: , at November 7, 2011 4:04 PM

I feel like I’m often looking for interesting things to read about a variety of topics, but I manage to include your site among my reads every day because you have interesting entries that I look forward to. Here’s hoping there’s a lot more top-notch material coming!

Posted by: Kasi Ohms at November 22, 2011 3:28 AM

I entirely agree , I definitely hate the “Hey there, I subscribed to your RSS Feed” type of comments on my blog. Even so I do get a kick out of comment spam that has absolutely no benefit for the guy spamming , broken links , no anchor text ,ect. I guess I should be upset just a little far more about it , but akismet is so excellent about catching issues any much more.

Posted by: Zulema Zack at December 5, 2011 8:14 AM