web
counter
 

I Didn't Know They Gave Out Rings at the Holocaust.

By Dustin Rowles | Posted Under Box Office Round-Ups | Comments (36)



090603_Hangover_cl.jpg

There were a few good surprises in the box-office over the weekend. First of all, Pixar’s Up held on to the top spot, bringing in a better than expected $44 million with an almost unheard of small 35 percent drop since its opening weekend. After two weekends, Up has already grossed $137 million. Plus, $44 million is the best second weekend of the year.

Even better: The Hangover, an R-rated comedy, actually pulled in at number two, barely losing out to Up, grossing $43 million. That number represents the 15th biggest opening, all time, for an R-Rated movie, but it’s the second biggest opening all time for an R-Rated comedy (behind American Pie 2). And believe it or not, in a rarity for summer blockbuster movies, analysts are actually suggesting that good reviews helped The Hangover do as well as it did. Unfortunately, we haven’t posted ours yet. There’s a very good reason for that. The Boozehound went and saw it on Friday night and, it was so good that he drained two flasks and had to resort to the emergency flask he keeps in his sock. He blacked out for two days. His wife finally found him in a San Francisco theater late last night mumbling something about Zach Galifianakis’ penis. We’ll have his review up this afternoon.

But my favorite surprise of the weekend? The dismal performance of Will Ferrell’s Land of the Lost. Ha ha! With a $100 million budget, Will Ferrell and Danny McBride, and somewhat well known source material, the movie couldn’t even break $20 million, which is less than what even Lost in Space starring Matt LeBlanc opened with. Could this possibly be the end of Will Ferrell’s reign of terror? Will he finally be forced to update his shtick? As of right now, he’s got quite a few projects in development, but none of them have started filming yet (including he and Sacha Cohen Baron’s Sherlock Holmes movie). At the very least, it’s going to be another year before we see Ferrell in theaters again.

Nia Vardalos’ attempts, once again, to capitalize on the success of 2002’s My Big Fat Greek Wedding, failed once again. My Life in Ruins grossed only $3.2 million. We’ll have that review up tomorrow. And in limited release, Sam Mendes’ Away We Go (written by Dave Eggers and hsi wife, Vendela Vida) was the big winner among indies, scoring a whopping $35,000 per screen average, compared to The Hangover’s $13,000 average. We’ll have that review up today after The Hangover.

Here’s your top five:

1. Up ($44 million; $137 million)


2. The Hangover ($43 million)


3. Land of the Lost ($19 million)


4. Night of the Museum II ($14 million; $127 million)


5. Star Trek ($8.5 million; $222 million)










Kafka on the Shore by Haruki Murakami | A Report on PajiBacon East













Comments

Will Ferrell and Sacha Baron Cohen in Sherlock Holmes?

Noooooooooooooo!

Is that the sound of hoofbeats I hear?

Basil Rathbone is spinning in his grave! As is Sir Arthur Conan Doyle!

Hopefully the dismal returns on Land of the Lost will wake somebody in Hollywood up and realize that Will Ferrell's gravy train has derailed about 5 movies ago!

Best news I've heard in quite some time!

Posted by: UncleJR at June 8, 2009 9:41 AM

Is anyone surprised? It doesn't even have anything to do with Will Ferrell. Give him a good script, you get "Stranger than Fiction." Give him this, you get a movie nobody sees.

I'm not a fan of his, but this isn't anything he did.

Posted by: twig at June 8, 2009 9:42 AM

We took a PajiBacon East field trip to "The Hangover" on Saturday and when Rowles mentions Zach Galifianakis’ penis, that's not the result of Boozehound's drunken delusions. (shudder)

Posted by: Tracer Bullet at June 8, 2009 9:49 AM

i hate having to preface comments like this by reiterating i'm a pothead with an unchecked entertainment budget, but...


it's not a perfect movie (by ANY means) but i had fun watching lost in space when that came out and even bought it for like 5 bucks in some bargain bin. AND i re-watch it every couple of years.
the twisty time-travelness, the spiders, heather graham being a cooze, the robot, mimi rogers: i recognize the badness of it all (even the porky pig/bugs bunny branding) but i still *heart*.

well, now you all know.
i'll be a pariah by noon, i'm sure.

well, screw you guys, matt leblanc is kinda sorta sexy in that tard way. hmph! i'll never tell you a secret again!

fuck you and your uppity smirks!

Posted by: gp at June 8, 2009 9:54 AM

Agreed, twig. He can be good as long as the script is worth something. But I guess you could say that for just about any actor.

Posted by: annoyingmouse at June 8, 2009 10:00 AM

gp I'm with you. I think that film rocks, in its own special way. I loved it when it came out. It's very entertaining.

I remember being very miffed when I found out there wouldn't be a sequel. I know other people rejoiced. I don't care. I like cheesy sci-fi.

Posted by: Carrie at June 8, 2009 10:01 AM

Loved The Hangover. Didn't really love Zach's penis though. Could have gone a little longer without seeing that to be honest with you.

Posted by: Jeremy Feist at June 8, 2009 10:05 AM

jeremy, you're one to talk. i have pix of YOUR penis etched in my brain!

Posted by: gp at June 8, 2009 10:07 AM

and thanks for the validation, carrie. meet me at 6 at my house for drinks and virtuosity.

Posted by: gp at June 8, 2009 10:13 AM

He can be good as long as the script is worth something. But I guess you could say that for just about any actor.

Now all we need to do is get Hollywood to understand that (ha ha ha ha lol). The article I read seemed shocked, shocked! that this movie didn't do as well as the last 'Will Ferrell vehicle'. As if plot, dialogue and story are really secondary to the Giant Faces on the Screen.

Posted by: twig at June 8, 2009 10:14 AM

I expect my reviews ON. TIME. you bunch of drunken dickheads.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at June 8, 2009 10:19 AM

"The dismal performance of Will Ferrell’s Land of the Lost"

THERE IS HOPE!

First Obama, now this? I feel like Eddie's Billy Ray Valentine: "What a happy day! WHAT A HAPPY DAY!

Then reality sinks in... Movie execs will spin this... Suddenly $19million on an opening weekend will be the new black, Will Ferrel's likeness will be seen in burned toast, and only the very worst scripts will gain sentience and demand their rights to existence.

By this time next year, all summer movies will contain at least four Will Ferrell scenes. And one reference to Rob Schneider.

Posted by: malikvlc at June 8, 2009 10:32 AM

I just finished watching Arthur Conan Doyle's "The Lost World" from 1925. Good silent flick with lots of stop action dinosaurs that actually breath. I was really amazed how many movies have completely ripped off this old one. "Up" has a scene that's completely ripped off from this movie. "King Kong" and "Godzilla" ripped off the monster going beserk in a big city. Really, rent this, (and make up your own dialog).

Posted by: BWeaves at June 8, 2009 10:35 AM

Agreed, twig. He can be good as long as the script is worth something. But I guess you could say that for just about any actor.

There are some actors that can make just about any scene shine, regardless of how bad the script is. And there are those who thrive on bad scripts.

Ferrell definitely has Robin Williams syndrome: his comedic persona got mined so much, there is nothing left, so he has to do drama. Which he oddly excels at, given the right vehicle.

Posted by: BWeaves at June 8, 2009 10:35 AM

Cna they really be ripping off just the movie, considering it was a book first? Plus, I hate when people say "ripping off" when it is something barely related. Especially when it is something that old. Yeah, Up and Lost World both have old guys exploring the world in fancy balloons, but I would hardly call it a ripoff.

Posted by: Vermillion at June 8, 2009 10:54 AM

Vermillion: I'm talking about EXACT scenes. The actual visual was the SAME.

Posted by: BWeaves at June 8, 2009 11:01 AM

Maybe someday Hollywood will learn that just because the public has brand awareness doesn't mean it will translate into interest. Land of the Lost looked not great and the TV show was also not great so I'm not sure what they wanted. They should be happy they got $20M, I didn't realize there were that many Land of the Lost geeks out there.

We saw Drag Me To Hell, it was fun. There were 4 other people in the theater so the crowd experience was not there. It was a lot cheesier than I thought it would be and definitely NOT the "Return to True Horror" as the ads blared, but an enjoyable time.

Posted by: TylerDFC at June 8, 2009 11:01 AM

There's scene in UP where there a sheer cliff with a flat top, and right next to it is a pillar of rock the same height. It's like the cliff had been sliced by a knife. That SAME exact shot was in "The Lost World," exactly the same.

Posted by: BWeaves@cfl.rr.com at June 8, 2009 11:07 AM

I have nothing against Ferrell. I'm hoping this signals the end of movie studios making every goddam TV show into a movie. Some of the TV shows sucked ass to begin with (like this one, I remember it being barely tolerable when I was a kid), why anyone thinks making them 30 feet high and 2 hours long is going to improve them is truly an enigma. I guess it pays not to underestimate creative inadequacy X the greed of studio bosses.

I hope The Hangover is good. The ads for it make it look funny as shit, but movie trailers have betrayed me before. I no longer trust them. You hear that, Hollywood trailer community? Your black magic no longer works on me.

Posted by: Slash at June 8, 2009 11:08 AM

Up at the top spot and Lad of the Lost not doing very well... there's still some faith in humanity

Posted by: barf at June 8, 2009 11:09 AM

This isn't quite the shot I wanted, but look at the first few seconds of the distant cliff and tell me that landscape shot wasn't used in "UP."

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DOFJarSLR3w&NR=1

Posted by: BWeaves at June 8, 2009 11:21 AM

Loved The Hangover. Didn't really love Zach's penis though. Could have gone a little longer without seeing that to be honest with you.

Posted by: Jeremy Feist at June 8, 2009 10:05 AM
---
That's not where I thought you were going with that when I read "Could have gone a little longer .."

Posted by: , (the commenter formerly known as bucdaddy) at June 8, 2009 11:25 AM

Stupid limited release, stupid Pittsburgh not counting, stupid waiting for stupid movies I stupidly really want to see. Stupid, stupid, stupid, stupid.

Posted by: Kate at June 8, 2009 11:26 AM

Yes, okay, I get it, BWeaves. Geez.

Posted by: Vermillion at June 8, 2009 11:27 AM

P.S. If you keep watching "The Lost World" clip, please realize that the white guy in blackface is balanced by the fact that the monkey's name is Jacko. Sorry.

Posted by: BWeaves@cfl.rr.com at June 8, 2009 11:28 AM

Now, see? I would have figured that if anybody here could appreciate the unexpected appearance of two dicks (well, sort of) in a mainstream Hollywood film, it would have been Feist. Looks like Pink Hulk have to serve as my gay lodestar now.

Posted by: Tracer Bullet at June 8, 2009 11:42 AM

"Now all we need to do is get Hollywood to understand that (ha ha ha ha lol). The article I read seemed shocked, shocked! that this movie didn't do as well as the last 'Will Ferrell vehicle'. As if plot, dialogue and story are really secondary to the Giant Faces on the Screen."

That is because the corporate MBA's are running Hollywood. In the old days, the moguls were astute businessmen, but they knew that FIRST you have to have a story, THEN you need a script. Then you put the pieces together with whatever stars happen to be biggest at the BO, as Variety says.

These days, the MBAs just figure if Will's last movie grossed x zillion dollars, then his next one must gross x+y zillion.

Script? Hire some hack and give him a 30-year-old story to adapt.

God, I used to love movies!

Actually, I finally saw Wall-E and Ironman, so I guess I still do. Nobody's holding a gun to my head and making me see the WF stuff.

Yet.

-Ralphie

Posted by: Ralphie at June 8, 2009 11:55 AM

I enjoyed The Hangover but it didn't completely blow me away or anything. Still, good comedy and the occasional surprise penis.

Also it's one of the few times I've seen an emotionally abusive relationship where the female party is the emotionally abusive one, so that's pretty progressive.

Posted by: Genny (also Rusty) at June 8, 2009 12:09 PM

Jesus, now I want to see The Hangover even more. Women have to look at bare tits and ass/barely concealed tits and ass in TV and movies all the time, but the very sight of one wang (or two, I guess) in an R-rated movie has all the men, yes, even the gay ones (apparently) all verklempt.

When you can count non-porn penis (or ass) sightings in the thousands, then you'll have something to bitch about.

Posted by: Slash at June 8, 2009 12:50 PM

I'm with Slash 165,000%. Penis has been poorly represented in big Hollywood movies. It used to be used solely by indie flicks and put-on-your-serious-face dramas. I love the dick on the big screen, be it blue, wearing a sweater or Galifianakis flavored. You show some dick in a movie, you gain instant respect. Unless you're Vincent Gallo. Then it's just creepy.

Posted by: Leigh at June 8, 2009 1:55 PM

"the very sight of one wang (or two, I guess) in an R-rated movie has all the men, yes, even the gay ones (apparently) all verklempt."

Slash, believe me, it's all about the context. That particular cock-shot is pretty... well...

Just see the movie. Trust me.

Posted by: TK at June 8, 2009 2:25 PM

Bweaves, I would have gone for "paying homage to" instead of "ripping off". I am sure they could have easily gone with a different landscape, but you are right- the two are amazingly similar. So similar that I can't imagine they didn't do it on purpose. I thought it was a nice touch, and showed that the animators were doing their homework.

Posted by: Phaeolus at June 8, 2009 2:45 PM

RE TK: "Slash, believe me, it's all about the context. That particular cock-shot is pretty... well... Just see the movie. Trust me."

K, fine, I guess... still, as much as men seem to fixate on their own dicks, I'd think seeing one in a movie wouldn't be that big of a deal, regardless of the context, unless it's being severed or punctured or something like that.

Posted by: Slash at June 8, 2009 3:22 PM

I'm not saying it's creepy and disturbing - the moment is actually friggin hilarious. But it's also, well, startling.

Posted by: TK at June 8, 2009 4:35 PM

RE TK: "I'm not saying it's creepy and disturbing - the moment is actually friggin hilarious. But it's also, well, startling."

See, you're just not used to it. If more "mainstream" filmmakers would just put a dick in their movies just to make sure there's one in there (the way they treat boobs now, like they're part of some odd boob inclusion mandate in the various contracts), it wouldn't be startling, wouldn't take you out of the moment. It'd just be, "Oh, another dick... whatever."

Posted by: Slash at June 8, 2009 5:47 PM

No, had it been a vagicooter in this context, it still would have been pretty damned surprising.But it wouldn't have been nearly as funny.

Posted by: Tracer Bullet at June 8, 2009 6:40 PM

[Nods at Tracer Bullet]

What he said.

Posted by: TK at June 8, 2009 8:11 PM


















Viral Hits

>> Pajiba Movie Posters

>> Pop Culture's 20 Greatest Dancing GIFs

>> Mindhole Blowers

>> The 100 Greatest Insults of All Time

>> The "Other" 100 Greatest Movie Quotes

>> The 100 Greatest Movie Threats of All Time

>> The Sean Bean Death Reel

>> Chicks Dig Beards: It's Science

>> The Coolest TV Show Title Sequences

>> The Most Rewatchable Movies

>> The Most Expensive Movies of All Time