paranormal-activity-dwrks2.jpg
I Always Feel Like Somebody's Watching Meeeeeee


The Weekend Box-Office Round-Up / William Goss

Box Office Round-Ups | October 25, 2009 | Comments (35)


A mere month ago, Paranormal Activity landed on maybe a dozen screens nationwide with very few showings on each over that weekend (and none during the week). Now, the little wonder has laid claim to nearly two thousand screens and bested a sixth Saw to become Halloween’s heavy hitter with $22 million over the weekend and $62 million to date — more than enough to cover the film’s $15,000-ish budget and all the costs of astroturfing the thing into a must-see phenom. In the meantime, let’s see how many other studios try to emulate Paramount’s success with P.A., either with viral marketing ploys or by trying to transform some other film-festival frightener into The Next Scariest Movie of All Time, Ever, Period, Exclamation Point, No Backsies.

My guess last week that Saw VI might not suffer so much in competition was proven to be quite wrong, as the sex-quel (?) took in $14.8 million, or half as much as any other Saw sequel has opened with. I, for one, sat out this round, despite recommendations from many of my peers. (“Jigsaw takes on health care!” they said. “It’s relevant now!”) The Weinsteins already retracted their promise/threat of a Rob Zombie Halloween 3 in 3-D; maybe Lionsgate can still go back on their assertion that a Saw VII would be likewise enhanced, and just shuffle the series straight-to-video where they can be promised a comfier profit margin for years to come.

Where the Wild Things Are fell to third place with $14.2 million, Law Abiding Citizen to fourth with $12.7 million, and Couples Retreat to fifth with $11 million. Newcomer Astro Boy debuted in sixth place with $7 million (because, while Wild Things may be psychologically distressing, it still doesn’t kill off a kid in its first ten minutes), The Stepfather slipped to seventh with $6.5 million, and franchise non-starter Cirque du Freak: The Vampire’s Assistant bowed with $6.3 million in eighth place, proving that not everything involving vampires is box office gold.

Cloudy with a Chance of Meatballs hung on like a champ at number 9 with $5.6 million, Zombieland closed out the top ten with $4.3 million, and just below the fold landed Amelia, the biopic that looked for months like a ready-made Oscar contender (the kit even came with a Hilary Swank, to ensure prestige!), only to be dumped without much press and on a relatively meager 800-ish screens to earn $4 million. Maybe if they’d just caught her last — no, her haunted flight with a handheld camera … yeah, that’s the ticket.

(Oh, and speaking of shameless segues, if you were curious as to the different cuts that Paranormal Activity went through in order to become the hype machine that it is today, feel free to click here where I go over that shit Costner-style. “She’s rocking back, and to the left…”)


Pajiba After Dark 10/25/09 | V First Eight Minutes





Comments

Oh brorrrrother, anyone getting a Blair Witch vibe from all the Paranormal Activity hype?


/will never watch

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at October 25, 2009 9:10 PM

The Vampire’s Assistant bowed with $6.3 million in eighth place, proving that not everything involving vampires is box office gold.

That's the best news I've heard all day, I know it may not be as bad as Twilight, but vampire related movies need to die (well, everything has an exception.)

Posted by: George at October 25, 2009 9:41 PM

Ha, and speaking of the Vampire's Assistant. I think its failure has everything to with John C. Reilly looking like a straight up, JACKASS, in that idiotic get-up they had him on.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at October 25, 2009 9:47 PM

you wouldn't be too let down, slim.
true, it's buzzing loudly. but the sense of uneasiness IS rather unsettling.
i saw it (for the second time) this morning. and it totally got me again.
honestly, i don't yelp out at the movies often. and i had a hard time remembering to breathe.


/would put my arm around you during the scary parts

Posted by: gp at October 25, 2009 9:48 PM

Glad that PA beat Saw, I was hoping that the torture porn would fail.

I'm also glad to see Zombieland continuing to kick ass.

Posted by: Mebe at October 25, 2009 11:15 PM

PA was OK- two jumpy parts- but after having a few days to mull it over...gotta say I don't think it was nearly as scary as the hype claimed it to be.

Blair Witch, 28 Days Later, Silence of the Lambs, and The Descent provided many more heebie jeebies for me.

Posted by: Be Adequite! at October 25, 2009 11:19 PM

The Decent was waaaay freakier than PA. All my friends came back from the latter talking about how amazing it was, which meant that two days later I got to laugh at them incessantly for being pussies.

Posted by: The_wakeful at October 26, 2009 12:27 AM

OUCH, Astroboy. That's just really embarrassing.

I am so pleased about Saw. So please. I overestimated the stupidity of people, I think. The pain might finally stop.

Posted by: figgy at October 26, 2009 12:39 AM

*pleased, not please. It's late.

Posted by: figgy at October 26, 2009 12:40 AM

It's nice that PA won over Saw, but i'm still not gonna see it. The whole premise smacks of people looking for shit, and then, lo and behold, they get some shit.

Seriously. Premise of the movie: "girl haunted since childhood, boyfriend thinks it's funny and exacerbates situation"

Oh what's that honey? you say you've been haunted since childhood? Well, bye!

don't start no shit, won't be no shit.

Posted by: Johnnyvonawesome at October 26, 2009 1:11 AM

John C Reilly DID look like a tool in that Cirque du Freak get-up, I'll give Slim that one. And I say this as a big Reilly fan.

Posted by: Daniel Hall at October 26, 2009 1:26 AM

Yeesh, I was hoping "Astro boy" would do better. Imagi are producing a Gatchaman (aka "Battle of the Planets") movie next, but this could force them to shut it down.

It's a shame too, because I fucking love Gatchaman, and I would kill to see it on the big screen =(

Posted by: ruru at October 26, 2009 2:10 AM

As much as I adored Astro Boy as a child, I couldn't quite bring myself to see it in theaters. It's apparent that I have some shame.

The trailer said he had butt-guns and I simply could not will myself to purchase the tickets.

Posted by: Schlegel at October 26, 2009 3:35 AM

So, correct me if I'm wrong, but is paranormal now the most profitable film of all time?

If Blair Witch had the trophy (I'm told it's the current frontrunner), it's return on investment was 376,625%.
That's with an assumed $66,000 budget, and a $248,639,099 worldwide gross.

Paranormal had an assumed budget of $15,000, and it's current box office total is (an estimated) $62,477,000.
An R.O.I of 416,413%..

Even if I am a bit wrong, which has happened before, once this flick goes worldwide we'll certainly have a pretty amazing record on our hands?

Either way, I'm glad it's beating off Saw VI with both hands. Gotta root for the underdog.

Posted by: The Only New Zealander at October 26, 2009 4:08 AM

Seriously. Premise of the movie: "girl haunted since childhood, boyfriend thinks it's funny and exacerbates situation"
Oh what's that honey? you say you've been haunted since childhood? Well, bye!
don't start no shit, won't be no shit.

That's why I'm surprised they haven't sold this movie as a "Girls, come see a guy acting like an idiot."

PA is not a great movie. If you're expecting the next great horror classic, you'll likely be disappointed. But if you want a neat little scary movie ahead of Halloween, go see it.

And I'm glad that the Saw franchise got torpedoed by PA. The Saw movies have gotten big because they're often the only horror movie premiering at that time. Give people a real option and they seem to be telling you what they think of those movies.

Posted by: Fredo at October 26, 2009 5:57 AM

Either way, I'm glad it's beating off Saw VI with both hands.

Posted by: The Only New Zealander at October 26, 2009 4:08 AM
__________

*snort*

Posted by: Kballs at October 26, 2009 7:39 AM

PA was the tits. I do not scare easily at all and it got to me. The theater was packed on Saturday night and people were literally SHRIEKING throughout the movie. I know the crowd's vibe added some juice to the experience, but it was easily the coolest theater-going experience of my life (surprisingly, "Independence Day" opening night held that distinction; nothing like drunk college kids giving standing ovations after every ham-fisted Billy Pullman speech). Can't wait for the studio to 'rhea all over it with a fucktardiculous sequel.

Posted by: Kballs at October 26, 2009 7:45 AM

Agreed, BSlim. Much of the appeal of John C. Reilly is that he always looks slightly ridiculous, so it's hard for me to imagine him being credible as a mastermind vampire in period clothing. I'm starting to wonder if he's aware of his limitations, which are considerable....

Posted by: sansho1 at October 26, 2009 8:09 AM

Also, Cirque du Freak: The Vampire's Assistant is a crap title. Coffee is for closers, and colons are for sequels. You gotta EARN that colon -- otherwise, the title comes across as the product of a committee, and it clunks, much like the unlamented Ballistic: Ecks vs. Sever.

Posted by: sansho1 at October 26, 2009 8:22 AM

The colons are there because Cirque du Freak is a series of at least 12 books. If the movie was entitled Cirque du Freak, you wouldn't know which book the movie represented. Strangely, The Vampire's Assistant is number 2 in the series. Maybe you should talk to the author, Darren Shan about his insistence on using colons.

Posted by: Goddess at October 26, 2009 8:33 AM

Well then maybe they should have just called the film The Vampire's Assistant and saved the Cirque du Freak: for if, when and maybe they got a sequel.

Posted by: Ava at October 26, 2009 8:42 AM

I didn't know that about the books. If they're sufficiently well-known that the movie could open just by drawing in fans of the books, then okay. But to the uninitiated, it's an unwieldy and overexplained title.

Posted by: sansho1 at October 26, 2009 8:50 AM

I watched PA the other day and was all 'Puh, not scary, I'm fine', and then when it came for me to go to sleep alone 24 hours later I was a leetle bit freaked out. It took me ages to pluck up the courage to turn my lights off and go to bed. My imagination is stupid. So, maybe it's a slow burner. I think it was for me anyway.

Posted by: Carrie at October 26, 2009 8:51 AM

Not that I've ever been a fan of the Saw franchise but it's balls that PA surpassed it. If you want a scare PA will not provide it. I'm the girl that jumps at her own shadow. Hell even Darkness Falls, the cheesy movie about the toothfairy scared the daylights out of me.

PA, not so much. I had very high expectations. It fell very short. And if anyone here has a interest in the paranormal and knows how a real investigation is conducted then you would agree that Micah got what was coming to him!!!!!!

Who tells there girlfriend that bringing in a demonologist will do more harm, but hey I have a bright idea...... Lets bust out a ouija board instead.

I laughed more than anything at this flick. The actors did a great job. Very believable in their performance, I really believed that Micah is a complete douche. I'm so ashamed that I contributed to PA's box office............

Posted by: Jax at October 26, 2009 9:29 AM

Can't remember where or when I read it, but someone once called bullshit on those claims that a movie could make it to the theaters costing anything remotely like (in this instance) $15,000. Believe he said at the time (this was at least several years ago) that you couldn't even get close for anything less than like $75,000, and even then it would be a piece of shit. May have been in the pre-digital/viral marketing days though, but I still have my suspicions when I see a number like that.

Posted by: , (TCFKAB) at October 26, 2009 9:55 AM

Saw VI wasn't decent for relevancy, that's for certain. I think the film would have been improved by not tackling health care. The loan shark opener was far more compelling and the pull line for the housing bubble plot in V made a lot more sense.

No. Saw VI rose above "it's the best you'll get from Hollywood" to "not so bad" by way of actually allowing for some character development and hiring a director that actually cared about directing actors more than gore. I mean, no one has bested Shawnee Smith's performance in the first film, but now we have a few more performances at the same level as Barah Soomekh (the doctor in Saw III): Tanedra Howard (winner of Scream Queens on VH1), Costas Mandylor (who finally takes on the role of the villain comfortably), and Betsey Russell (amazing what happens when she's given some actual dialogue for once).

I'm also perfectly aware that I might as well be speaking Ancient Greek for the number of people who will understand at all what I just wrote about. I accept my horror minority status on the site as a badge of honor.

Posted by: Robert at October 26, 2009 10:03 AM

i would like to see Paranormal Activity, but I don't want to have to go alone. I have zero friends who like horror movies, so the only way I could ever get someone to go with me is if I lied and said there would be kitties and unicorns in it.

I should just suck it up and go, alone or not, but my other problem is similar to what Carrie said about thinking of it later and freaking out a little. If in fact it is creepy, even if I don't get scared in the theater, I'd probably get home, try to go to sleep, and end up lying there all night scaring myself by thinking about it.

The only drawback of having a good imagination is the fact that you have the ability to scare the shit out of yourself.

Posted by: ZombieNurse at October 26, 2009 10:12 AM

If you appreciate horror movies and you don't like the Saw series, that's cool. A lot of the hate, however, sounds like the bleatings of someone who got interrupted by those darned noisy neighbor kids while knitting a wonderful new tea kettle cozy featuring beloved pet Mr. Bootsie (how many years has it been since he passed on now...hmmm...let's see...mercy sakes...) and looked up just long enough to sneer at the window and mutter about "torture porn...or whatever it is those youngsters are up to..."

I like the Saw series. I really liked a couple of the films, and I'm glad they're squirting one out every October. They should have been doing this for years with Halloween, the film series that lay claim to the title with the plan for a new premise for each annual installment, that sadly turned into a ridiculous stream of Michael Meyers pictures every few years instead. We should be on our 2nd or 3rd year of new Trick 'R Treat stories, too. Oh, and in theaters. The Saw movies aren't a new premise each time, but they manage to drag the story forward a bit each year, and like a lot of films, even bad ones, the stories behind how, where, and by whom they're being made are pretty interesting as well. What I don't like, however, is that these fairly innocuous and nichy films seem to terrify the 98-year-old ladies (perhaps from the same knitting circle)at the studios into shockblocking any short of scary movie out of October and into god-knows-where.

As for PA; it's apparently not scary to some people. Cool. I haven't been scared in a movie since I was like 3. It is engaging and fun though. I can see where people who are scared by movies would be scared by this one. If you're an emotional dead end and don't get misty-eyed at sentimental moments in film, maybe you're not the barometer for romcom quality, either.

I'm glad that PA is doing well, that Saw VI is apparently better than expected, and that maybe next year we can have more than just Saw VII and its plucky challenger in the theaters come spookytime. After all, look at the current slate: Saw VI and Paranormal Activity are in theaters already, but we could do better. The only wide-distribution new release this week, the week of Halloween, IS about a frightening, disfigured freak of a monster who apparently preyed on children, but it's not an imaginative and fun horror tale; it's the Michael Jackson concert film. Yep, Grandma, we can do better.

Posted by: laredo at October 26, 2009 11:32 AM

I liked Saw 1. I really liked Saw 2. After that, they gradually lost my interest, and this year, I decided that I didn't really care what the traps were, let alone how the story would come together/be strung along.

Apathy turned me off the Saw franchise, not scruples. I'll catch it on DVD, grandson.

Posted by: William Goss at October 26, 2009 11:37 AM

Apathy.

That I understand.

Posted by: laredo at October 26, 2009 12:07 PM

This is a great news!! so, for celebration, I want to recommend you lonely guys who hate lonely nights a great online club to meet your activity partner, romance and lover, either for heat or passion: __Tallconnect C om___ the most popular place for hot modelss, handsome men meet and mingle! u might be surprise what u end up with!!LOL :-)

Posted by: Oliver at October 26, 2009 12:43 PM

I saw PA this past Saturday and loved it. The hype is already starting as is the inevitable backlash.

So here's my free advice: go see it now. Or as soon as possible. Don't read a bunch of shit about it in advance or talk to anyone who has seen it. Take someone similar and just HAVE FUN!

It's just a fun, fun movie. That's how I approached it and that's what I got.

Posted by: Snuggiepants the Deathbringer at October 26, 2009 1:22 PM

Oh and I saw it in a packed house and I swear to God I didn't see a single person get up and go out of the theater for anything for over 90 minutes. Even the two guys sitting behind me who talked loudly about computers during the entire previews (ASSWIPERS) shut the fuck up when the show started and I didn't hear another thing out of them except their squeals along with everyone else squealing and screaming.

Posted by: Snuggiepants the Deathbringer at October 26, 2009 1:25 PM

Yeah, the Blair Witch movie cured me of wanting to see a movie that people promise is "terrifying." Blair Witch was boring as shit. I didn't pay to see it (because I'm kind of cheap), but I still felt kinda taken advantage of after seeing it. This movie (Quasi-Paranormal Fuckery or whatever) looks like people jumping out at each other while filming in night vision. I suspect Paris Hilton's sex tape is far more frightening.

Posted by: Slash at October 26, 2009 4:16 PM

Im surprised the Cirque du Freak book fans didnt rally up for this one especially with all the chatter online. But i think most people are afraid that the image of the story will be ruined because of all the changes of the film.
I agree that the colon is highly uncalled for but idiot advertisers just think the public is too stupid to notice its a vampire movie so they add it there to completely ruin the image and have twilight haters running miles away to different movies.
Cirque has HARDLY ANYTHING to do with the ever crazy vampire pandemic. It was being made YEARS before people even knew what twilight was and an even more popular book series. It was dropped by its distributor WB,because the director didnt want it anymore. But when it was picked back up again, screaming teenage girls running towards a certain movie just ruined it for everyone. It should at least be given a chance before its judged by morons who think they know everything.

Posted by: Misa at October 26, 2009 6:12 PM





Post a comment

 (required)

 (required)


Preview of your comment:



Video ads popping up after each page view? Try clearing your browser's cookies.