free counter with statistics Box Office Results May 3, 2009 | Pajiba - Scathing Reviews for Bitchy People

loganfights.jpg
Wolverine Claws Out Box-Office's Eyes, Craps In Orbital Socket


The Weekend Box-Office Round-Up / Dustin Rowles

Box Office Round-Ups | May 3, 2009 | Comments (40)


Here’s a statement you’re likely to hear a lot over the next few months: “Despite poor reviews, X-Men Origins: Wolverine nevertheless managed to obliterate the box-office this weekend.” While huge, mega, heavily-promoted multiplex squatters tend to be critic proof, I still think that atrocious reviews are doing a wonderful service. We know you’re going to see the movie anyway — Hollywood commands it — but we help set expectations so low that you don’t hate the blockbusters nearly as much as you thought you would. Hooray! That was my experience with Wolverine after TK’s review. I knew it was going to blow. But thanks to the massive lowering of expectations, I wasn’t terribly disappointed to find that it really was awful. Thanks TK!

That said, even with the little screen time he had, Ryan Reynolds was a pretty good Deadpool, and assuming they don’t give it the same Fox Studios treatment, I totally would like to see a Deadpool spin-off. And a Gambit one, as Taylor Kitsch did a fairly decent job, too, with his limited screen time. And thanks to the massive $87 million domestic take of Wolverine, we’ll probably see an X-Men film every summer for the next decade, starting in 2010 with X-Men: The First Class. In fact, I like to think of Wolverine not as the massive disappointment that it was, but a serviceable segue in to The First Class, though none of those youngsters did much for me. I just can’t wait for the Dazzler and Jubilee spin-off — the big finale sequence will take place in a mall! The Mimic spin-off should be good, too. He’ll just repeat everything everyone else says until everyone leaves the theater. It’ll open with $92 million.

Note: Dazzler and Jubilee are actual X-Men. Can you come up with a more ridiculous name than those for superpower mutants? In fact, I understand that Dazzler actually be-dazzles supervillians to death.

Wolverine didn’t have as big an opening as the $102 million that X-Men: The Last Stand put up three years ago, but it did outperform the opening weekend of the first two films (X-Men, $54 million; X-Men 2, $85 million). So why, despite poor reviews, awful buzz, and a leaked version of the movie did Wolverine put up as big a number as it did? Because it was the first blockbuster of the season, and there’s something about the first weekend of May that compels us to the theaters. It’s instincts. It’s been bred into us. Some sort of genetic coding they put into baby formula and McDonald’s Happy Meals. It’s not really a choice. So, don’t feel bad if you ponied up $10 knowing you were going to be disappointed. It’s like losing your virginity — you know it’s going to be awkward and bad and uncomfortable. But you do it anyway. And maybe the next time, it’ll be better. And you can bet your ass that, next week, Wolverine is gonna have a massive drop-off when Star Trek opens.

Meanwhile, the counterprogrammed romantic comedy Ghosts of Girlfriends Past failed to do much, bringing in a paltry $15 million. Why? Because Wolverine had its own counterprogramming built in. Why go see Matthew McConaughey glisten when Hugh Jackman is already parading around without his shirt on? A brilliant ploy, really. Kudos, Fox Studios. You may have swindled the American public out of $87 million, but at least you saved most of them from Ghosts of Girlfriends Past.

And, believe it or not, there was another wide opener this weekend: Battle for Terra came in at number 12, with a hugely disappointing $1 million take. We’ll have a review up tomorrow. There were no notable indie releases, either. So, here’s your top five:

5. Monsters vs. Aliens ($5.8 million; $182 million)

4. 17 Again ($6.3 million; $48 million)

3. Obsessed ($12 million; $47 million)

2. Ghosts of Girlfriends Past ($15 million)

1. X-Men Origins: Wolverine ($87 million)


X-Men Origins Wolverine Review | Kevin Smith Discusses Working with Bruce Willis



Comments

I think we need a good documentary about the Blob living with his obesity. You know, a good tearjerker to lead us into the Mister Sinister spin-off.

Posted by: Shaun at May 3, 2009 3:09 PM

In hindsight, I prefer that alternate version of Wolverine I proposed a month back...

Posted by: William Goss at May 3, 2009 3:20 PM

I keep reading the next movie as X-Men:Head of the Class which would really be a better movie. Howard Hessman as a more laid back mutant teacher with his quirky cast of characters.

Posted by: Mrcreosote at May 3, 2009 3:22 PM

I didn't see this movie. I will never see this movie. Fuck Bret Ratner for taking away my faith in the X-Men franchise.

Posted by: Lucas at May 3, 2009 3:24 PM

"We know you’re going to see the movie anyway." No, no I won't. Why do people do that? Every summer Hollywood drops a bucket of turds on us (and most of the rest of the year for that matter) and every year I hear a bunch of people talking about how they know such-and-such movie is going to blow syphillitic donkey cock but how they're gonna see it anyway.

Posted by: jbrader at May 3, 2009 3:35 PM

The first weekend of May does not compel me to the theaters. The first weekend of May compels me to pick strawberries. Mmm...strawberries. So instead of the complete time and soul suck that Wolverine would have provided, I instead have a full tummy, tanned shoulders and stained lips. Suck on that, Hollywood!

Posted by: HotPinkLola at May 3, 2009 3:50 PM

Is First Class going to be the First X-Man Team? No Wolverine, No Storm, a Hairless flesh-colored Beast with huge hands and feet.
And wasn't Iceman on there somewhere? And Angel? Won't they have to do a shit-ton of ret-conning?

Posted by: Optimus Rhyme at May 3, 2009 4:01 PM

Won't they have to do a shit-ton of ret-conning?

Not giving a shit about story means never having to retcon to make sense.

Posted by: Steven Lloyd Wilson at May 3, 2009 4:08 PM

That appears to be what the miniseries book was about, Optimus, so:
Won't they have to do a shit-ton of ret-conning?

It would seem like it.

I thought "Children of the Atom" was a nice little series too. Pretty Steve Rude!

This first weekend of May I'm at work being a misanthrope. You're the one who went and saw "Wolverine", not me, Mr. High Horse!

Posted by: Jay at May 3, 2009 4:12 PM

Oh I'm seeing this, but I ain't paying a dime, just like I do with porn.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at May 3, 2009 4:27 PM

On a tangential note, what do you think a porno with the budget of Wolverine would look like? I'm completely blitzed off of vicodin so I can't offer a possible situation, but I trust the pagibans to generate a brilliant concept.

Posted by: Braski at May 3, 2009 5:06 PM

Holy fuck, Ryan Reynolds AND Taylor Kitsch? No wonder it opened at number one!!

Posted by: Er at May 3, 2009 5:11 PM

Can you come up with a more ridiculous name than those for superpower mutants?

Claptacular. He can turn lights on and off by clapping.

Posted by: Pinky McLadybits at May 3, 2009 5:16 PM

You may have swindled the American public out of $87 million, but at least you saved most of them from Ghosts of Girlfriends Past.

Really, you have to look at the bright side or just go into the dark and bawl.

Why see Wolverine if I know it's gonna suck? Two reasons:

1) Shirtlessness
2) Super powers

That is a combination I can't resist.

Posted by: figgy at May 3, 2009 5:41 PM

On a tangential note, what do you think a porno with the budget of Wolverine would look like?
Posted by: Braski at May 3, 2009 5:06 PM

Bullet-timed cumshots, CGI'd titanic tits and asses.

-------------------------------------------

"Can you come up with a more ridiculous name than those for superpower mutants?..."

Supersuck, with the ability to suck, really....really.... hard.

Much like this movie.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at May 3, 2009 6:09 PM

*snort*

How about a penis that shoots out like Wolverine's claws? Do they do CGI in porn? Because that would be so awesome.

SCHWING!

Posted by: figgy at May 3, 2009 6:17 PM

On a tangential note, what do you think a porno with the budget of Wolverine would look like?

Not a clue, but I'm totally going to donate 100 million dollars anonymously to Digital Playground to produce that exact movie if I ever get my hands on that kind of money.

It couldn't be any stupider than this, hell, some porno actors are better actors than the blockbuster actors.

Posted by: George at May 3, 2009 6:28 PM

I'd totally do that penetration ((repeat different angle))penetration ((different angle))penetration ((different angle)) in super slow-mo... and shaky cam.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at May 3, 2009 6:37 PM

I'm seeing Wolverine tonight with my mom. Why? Because I hate myself and it feels so good. Also, my mom hasn't seen any of the other ones (so she claims, I'm convinced she saw the first one, but doesn't remember it, much like when she and I watched The Notebook and she can't recall it at all, to my extreme jealousy). She's also not a huge comic book fan, but likes action well enough. Plus, my mom and I have a long history of seeing shitty movies together and if it blows hard we have a great time making fun of it.

Don't judge me.

what do you think a porno with the budget of Wolverine would look like?

Didn't they do that, but, like, it was about Pirates?

Posted by: Kayanne at May 3, 2009 6:49 PM

I made the mistake last night of getting into my "What's the point of seeing superhero movies when the superhero can't lose?" rant with a co-worker I didn't know was a fanboy. It was a really really long five minutes while he spieled on about the marvelous backstories of the X-Men blah blah blah and how it's not WHO is gonna win but the HOW blah blah blah and you can say that about ANY action movie it's not like Bruce Willis is ever gonna get killed blah blah blah.

None of which made me want to see this any more than I did before, which was:

0.0
---
4. 17 Again ($6.3 million; $48 million)

3. Obsessed ($12 million; $47 million)

2. Ghosts of Girlfriends Past ($15 million)

1. X-Men Origins: Wolverine ($87 million)
---
Recession? What recession?

Oh the humanity.

Posted by: , (the commenter formerly known as bucdaddy) at May 3, 2009 6:51 PM

Didn't they do that, but, like, it was about Pirates?

Oh it's a whole series. I've seen them at Blockbuster too, so I guess it's like big budget Spice.

I made the mistake last night of getting into my "What's the point of seeing superhero movies when the superhero can't lose?" rant

I'm not sure you understand the concept of heroic stories. Don't expect Oedipus if you're watching Perseus. Heroes resolve conflict, that's their job. Just cause you're a nihilist...

Posted by: Jay at May 3, 2009 7:23 PM

You know why Battle for Terra opened at 12? Because I saw one commercial for it two days ago and thought it was a TV show until I got to the theater to see Wolverine and saw a showing for it.

And because it bears repeating; I would do awful things to Taylor Kitsch. I probably would have seen Wolverine just for him, but Jackman was a nice draw too (and I'll add that Daniel Henney and Kevin Durand minus fat suit are pretty easy on the eyes as well). I wish that the next X-Men movie was just two hours worth of Gambit being charming and side smiling at people between vicious battles where his shirt gets ripped off. Hell, I'll make that movie if someone wants to give me a few mill. I promise you'll get a return on your investment.

Posted by: Genny (also Rusty) at May 3, 2009 7:26 PM

"In fact, I understand that Dazzler actually be-dazzles supervillians to death."

Yep. And she did it on roller skates.

Posted by: Chickaboom at May 3, 2009 7:46 PM

"On a tangential note, what do you think a porno with the budget of Wolverine would look like?"


There's an Iron Man joke in there. Maybe with a little Thor's hammer kicker.

Posted by: MrCresosote at May 3, 2009 7:52 PM

Buc, I WAS the obnoxious co-worker going into the X-Men backstory!

Here's a thought for anyone who cares: if you look REALLY hard, you can see a NAKED Hugh Jackman! for a few seconds...from a distance and even more briefly a quick ass shot.

Just providing a public service here.
The Deadpool bit still pissed me off and no amount of shirtless jackman rescued that for me. My friend who I went to see it with was miffed with me though. She's a "glass is half full" girl and thought i should enjoy the movie for the beauty that was there.

Needless to say...I didn't. Gambit wasn't bad though.

Posted by: Four Eyes at May 3, 2009 8:01 PM

I forgot to address the porn question.

I'd say that a porn with that kind of budget would mostly depend on where you spent the money. High def cameras and sound systems? No thank you, sex is one thing that benefits from a bit of fuzziness, otherwise it just looks like some kind of unorthodox gynecological exam.

HOWEVER, if you spent that money on, say, talent and made a video of Ryan Reynolds and Scarlet Johansson or Javier Bardem and Penelope Cruz (or all four, some of you might like that sort of thing) making the beast with two backs, then I'd say you might have a winner on your hands. If they were well directed.

Posted by: Genny (also Rusty) at May 3, 2009 8:02 PM

I turned to my brother after watching Wolverine and said, "It's the new Showgirls."

He actually agreed with me.

So atrocious it swings back to entertaining, and enough eye candy to keep you interested.

Posted by: Robert at May 3, 2009 8:29 PM

I didn't feel compelled to go to the theater. I felt compelled to get caught up on Breaking Bad (which might be the best thing on TV right now) and then to watch Torchwood repeats on BBC America. I'm also happy with my choice.

Posted by: Cindy at May 3, 2009 8:30 PM

Note: Dazzler and Jubilee are actual X-Men. Can you come up with a more ridiculous name than those for superpower mutants?

I submit "Boom Boom" and "Skids." Actual Marvel mutants whose powers have nothing to do with bowel movements, despite what their names might suggest. Oh, and "M." She's a superpowered chick who is nigh invulnerable, and all they could come up with is the initial of her first name. Lame.

Posted by: Melissa at May 3, 2009 8:44 PM

I thought for a few seconds on Friday about seeing Wolverine, then I came back to my senses and chose to spend my weekend resting and watching basketball and boxing (Ricky Hatton went sleepytime).

It's a shame what Fox has done to the X-Men series. Singer really gave them a great start.

As for the porn debate: I think Superbad had said it all when Michael Cera and Jonah Hill debated the inherent quality of porn. "Well, I'm sorry but the Coen Brothers don't direct the porn I watch."

For a Wolverine-like budget...you CAN get the Coens to direct your porn for you.

Posted by: Fredo at May 3, 2009 10:34 PM

But you know they cast would be John Torturro and Frances MacDormand and as much as I like the two of them just...no. No. Ew.

Posted by: figgy at May 3, 2009 11:05 PM

Okay... if you were as buff as Jackman in that picture... would you ever want to look any other way?

Posted by: Spender at May 4, 2009 5:16 AM

I’m a tall sexy 24-year-old bisexual girl.I want marriage, but it’s too difficult.
Marriage is a good thing,but LGBT marriage can not be accepted by the mass. There is only seven countries accept LGBT marriage.We leads a hard life. Actually, divorce may also happen to straight people.I’m lonely.Then a old friend told me a good website http://www.seekbi.com.I joined and always have some discussion. "As to love, we should cherish it and love the one you love. “It is what we all bisexual get after the discussion.
Lincoln also said all people have rights to love and be loved.
Obama should do something for us.He should make the law of marriage and divorce completely for our LGBT.
Now I have a girl friend.We will have a wedding until the USA accept LGBT marriage
Thanks for reading and backing for us.

Posted by: emma green at May 4, 2009 5:17 AM

New reality series, Who Wants to Marry a LGBT Spambot? Coming soon to Fox.

Posted by: Adam C at May 4, 2009 8:06 AM

I know it's meant to suck, but does a new Jarmusch film not count as a notable indie release? Just wonderin'.

Posted by: Arran at May 4, 2009 8:52 AM

man, that spambot has horrible grammar.

Posted by: arr matey at May 4, 2009 9:59 AM

Crap, the next-generation spambot is online and active. That post almost made sense, plus they're figuring us out -- can't go wrong with bisexual chicks.

Posted by: socalledonlycousins at May 4, 2009 10:02 AM

"On a tangential note, what do you think a porno with the budget of Wolverine would look like?"

I think it would look a lot like that movie with the boy with the flaming jizz, only the explosions wouldn't be off camera.

Posted by: BWeaves at May 4, 2009 10:05 AM

I am guilty of contributing to the Wolverine box office domination. It was the husband's birthday, so we took the kids to see this. Apparently, it's okay if you're 12 or 13. I focused on the half to fully naked men and didn't find it an unpleasant diversion. Ryan Reynolds and Taylor Kitsch did pretty well with what little they were given. Liev Schrieber was completely wasted in this film, but he looked like he was having a really good time. And it's always nice to see a buff man who actually has body hair - which I'm sure is only possible because they couldn't figure out how to make Wolverine shave his pelt. It wasn't a good movie, but it didn't make me blindingly angry, probably because I set the bar low after reading TK's review.

How's that for damning with faint praise?

Posted by: Reba at May 4, 2009 10:10 AM

Dazzler was Marvel's response to disco.

Recently, she's been remade into a alternarock sensation. Unfortunately, she no longer wears rollerskates.

Posted by: space oddity at May 5, 2009 11:31 AM